122:
thing is sure to come up: "too new", last time I checked the arbitrary time break is somewhere beyond six months. You might also want to do some admin related work: image copyright/source problem tagging, helping with deletion requests, whacking vandals, dispute resolutions, etc. While not mandatory, it helps to explain why you want the "mop". Otherwise I think you are ok: you know how WP works (bot, AWB, templates, wikiprojects, images, commons, edit summaries, etc.) and show great dedication. So good luck,
121:
I second
Fleetflame that you need more substantive mainspace edits... I am sure you have heard about 1FA "requirement" (that each new admin has to have at least one featured article under their belt), but it is very strong in general spirit that new admins need to write/expand articles. Also another
69:
Kudos for your hard work in uploading images and changing file types. This type of edit shows a lot of dedication on your part. If you intend to apply for adminship, I would suggest that you edit more content, just because people tend to use that as a reference point. Also, in your first conflict
217:
after the discussion came to an impasse, and after some calm discussion, we accepted a phrase that worked for all parties. After this conflict, I've tried to stay away from political articles. I also modified my user page to be less outspoken politically, because it became an issue during the
203:
on the other user, but I was disappointed when it didn't get any meaningful outside comments. We reached a truce after I sought out somebody with
Constitutional knowledge and asked him to comment on the article. He explained the situation really well, and we accepted his
184:
Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
191:. Prior to that, I had only engaged in minor editing, and I was only drawn into it because I felt that the article had a POV problem. I was very inexperienced, and I was
195:
pretty hard by the other user involved. That being said, I think I did about as well as I could. I read up on policy along the way and went through some of the
214:
104:
I stay away from that type of comment now. I did a lot better in the second conflict, even though I was outnumbered by some very passionate people. --
200:
162:
I've uploaded. It gives a lot of satisfaction, and I feel that I contribute much more to articles with an image than if I spent that time editing. --
143:
91:
227:
171:
55:
43:
101:
I was, and it was mostly due to inexperience in conflict resolution. After I got some sense I offered him a general apology.
159:
17:
155:
Of your contributions to
Knowledge (XXG), are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
87:
223:
167:
51:
37:
127:
192:
231:
188:
175:
131:
115:
95:
83:
59:
196:
219:
163:
105:
47:
33:
123:
187:
I have been in 2 edit conflicts having to do with politics. The first one was on
78:" etc, etc.). I would try to be a little nicer in the future. Hope this helps!
46:) I'm interested in RFA, and I was wondering if I need to work on anything. --
76:
It does your argument discredit when you don't bother to contribute to it.
210:
102:
213:. This one went a lot more smoothly. I opened a
209:The second conflict I had involved the lead of
8:
70:you were to a certain extent uncivil (e.g. "
218:acceptance phase of the mediation. --
7:
142:View this user's edit count using
24:
199:process. I ended up opening an
144:Interiot's 'Wannabe Kate' Tool
1:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Editor review
232:10:44, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
176:10:44, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
132:15:51, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
116:08:05, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
96:02:08, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
60:09:51, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
250:
72:who cares about the UN?
158:I'm very proud of the
215:mediation request
113:
94:
241:
109:
82:
249:
248:
244:
243:
242:
240:
239:
238:
189:Iraq Resolution
31:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
247:
245:
237:
236:
235:
234:
207:
205:
182:
180:
179:
178:
147:
146:
119:
118:
30:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
246:
233:
229:
225:
221:
216:
212:
208:
206:
202:
198:
194:
190:
186:
185:
183:
181:
177:
173:
169:
165:
161:
157:
156:
154:
153:
152:
151:
145:
141:
140:
139:
138:
134:
133:
129:
125:
117:
114:
112:
107:
103:
100:
99:
98:
97:
93:
89:
85:
81:
77:
73:
67:
66:
62:
61:
57:
53:
49:
45:
42:
39:
35:
29:
26:
19:
149:
148:
136:
135:
120:
110:
108:
79:
75:
71:
68:
64:
63:
40:
32:
27:
220:I. Pankonin
164:I. Pankonin
160:350+ images
106:I. Pankonin
48:I. Pankonin
111:Review me!
80:Fléêťflämẽ
204:proposal.
150:Questions
137:Comments
34:Ipankonin
28:Ipankonin
211:Iraq War
65:Reviews
44:contribs
74:" and "
193:bitten
124:Renata
197:WP:DR
16:<
128:talk
38:talk
201:RFC
230:)
174:)
130:)
58:)
228:c
226:/
224:t
222:(
172:c
170:/
168:t
166:(
126:(
92:C
90:-
88:T
86:-
84:U
56:c
54:/
52:t
50:(
41:·
36:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.