115:
know why you made the changes you did or why their edit(s) was reverted. It is great that you are connecting with other users and getting involved in the
Knowledge (XXG) community. However, if you are planning on becoming an admin, these activities should be something you do regularly and unfortunately, will not increase your chances as much as they should. On the other hand, you are doing a great job at providing edit summaries, as they are helpful to other users and will increase your chances of becoming an admin.
85:. I tend to think of myself as a person who can let out steam in an appropriate way, and therefore I deal with stress in a simplistic manner. Whenever appropriate, I place the corresponding warning template on the second-party's talkpage, try and solve the dispute myself rather than getting a third opinion, and end it as quickly as possible (and properly) so I can get back to editing. In the future, I think I will employ my current methods for dispute resolution.
114:
On another note, I really do appreciate your dedication and determination for fighting vandalism, we need more people like you. I also enjoy doing so whenever I can. In addition, I noticed that you post on use talk pages quite often, which is definitely a plus because it is good to let other user
96:
I think editor reviews are a great way to get the community together and comment on each other's editing personalities so that they may become even greater editors. Out of this editor review, I would like to see editors comment specifically on any weaknesses or hurdles that might affect my future
69:
My primary contributions to
Knowledge (XXG) include vandal fighting, random minor editing, and AWB tagging. I am particularly pleased with my vandalism reverting, as I take great pride in bearing my automated tools and reverting away, to know that little children looking for research will stumble
142:
Thank you for your review. At this time, I cannot find time to edit on
Knowledge (XXG), but I check my userpage and all quite often. I plan on becoming more active as of next week. Thank you very much for your review, and believe me - I appreciate constructive feedback more than you might think!
126:
to find articles that really need some improvements. Overall, you are a great contributor and I’m sure everyone appreciates you help and involvement in the
Knowledge (XXG) community. Please try to stay active because you are a valuable member and it will help you gain influence when applying for
110:
I am relatively new to
Knowledge (XXG) and you definitely have more experience than me but I still want to provide a review for you in hope that it will be useful when you apply for adminship. After looking at your user contributions, it seems that you fairly inconsistent with your presence on
111:
Knowledge (XXG). The most number of edits was during
December of 2012 and that number decreases dramatically after. In fact, you didn’t have any edits during November and December of 2013. Please keep in mind that to become an admin, you should be an active in the Knowledge (XXG) community.
55:
Hi, I've been around
Knowledge (XXG) for a while now, and I'm starting to explore Knowledge (XXG)'s policies in a more in-depth way. In about a year, I will apply at RfA, to extend my work a little further. Any comments about my working habits would be very much appreciated. Thanks!
76:
Have you been in editing disputes or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future? If you have never been in an editing dispute, explain how you would respond to one.
91:
What do you want to get out of this editor review? Are you thinking of running for adminship? Would you like feedback on a specific area of your editing? Or would you just like a general review of your edits?
50:
151:
44:
65:
What are your primary contributions to
Knowledge (XXG)? Are there any about which you are particularly pleased? Why?
17:
119:
147:
38:
132:
155:
136:
123:
81:
Looking back, I haven't done any mass editing on a single article, with the exception of
144:
33:
128:
82:
97:
RfA, although general comments will be appreciated.
122:to help you with your edits. I also suggest using
8:
7:
24:
1:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Editor review
172:
156:15:07, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
137:05:54, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
118:I see that you are using
120:Knowledge (XXG):Twinkle
70:over one less thing.
163:
54:
171:
170:
166:
165:
164:
162:
161:
160:
124:User:SuggestBot
36:
31:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
169:
167:
159:
158:
104:
102:
101:
100:
99:
89:
88:
87:
74:
73:
72:
30:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
168:
157:
153:
149:
146:
141:
140:
139:
138:
134:
130:
125:
121:
116:
112:
108:
107:
98:
94:
93:
90:
86:
84:
79:
78:
75:
71:
67:
66:
64:
63:
62:
61:
57:
52:
49:
46:
43:
40:
35:
29:
26:
19:
117:
113:
109:
105:
103:
95:
80:
68:
59:
58:
47:
41:
32:
27:
127:adminship.
60:Questions
34:Kevin12xd
28:Kevin12xd
152:contribs
143:Cheers,
129:LeDrewww
106:Reviews
45:contribs
83:Roblox
145:Kevin
51:count
16:<
148:12xd
133:talk
39:talk
154:)
135:)
150:(
131:(
53:)
48:·
42:·
37:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.