283:: I see that you are utilizing Knowledge (XXG)-space, which is a good thing. However, I only found one AfD on your record, which you created, but I have never seen any edits participating in AfD discussion. AfD's help sift through Knowledge (XXG)'s content and help provide necessary decisions as to what is appropriate to keep and what is not. You could also get involved in some policy discussion. This is also fundamental to building Knowledge (XXG).
53:) I have not been very active for 4 months after I created my account, but now I am on wikipedia daily, and will respond quickly to any questions on my talk page. My areas of expertise are RC patrolling, userpage design (which I really need to step away from, pardon the pun), WikiProjects, and any technical queries (although I know no programming languages).
293:. But, major edits are something you definitely should leave 90-100% edit summaries. Major changes to article structure and content are hard to sift through but with a descriptive edit summary, editors are not surprised to come back and find an article drastically different than they left it before.
333:
Since you asked, here's a quick review. I don't think you've yet found the right balance between article writing, administrative work (i.e. vandal fighting), and social interaction. Basically, you've only written articles about things you know well. See if there's something you don't know as well,
827:
I can second the above comment. Though the enthusiasm is good yuo need to check criteria. I note you stuck a speedy delete tag on a band article I created and while I concede that a debate is warranted it certainly doesn't qualify as a speedy delete. A more constructive process may be an expand tag
811:
This editor nominated an article about a first class cricketer for AfD despite clear sources being given and
Knowledge (XXG)'s established policy of holding first class cricketers to be notable people. The nomination was speedily withdrawn by another editor because notability had been established.
803:
I was once bothered by an anon. vandal whom I had reverted and decided to vandalise my userpage as retaliation, I was not aware of the problem until a message was posted on my talk page. However, I was glad that when I returned to the vandal's talk page there was a block notice on their page (all of
351:
For the love of all that is holy, fix that userpage. Blinking text should never be used, the distractions are endless, and I honestly was trying to remember if you could have an LSD flashback without ever using LSD. Also, the main space (you know, the encyclopedia part of the encyclopedia) is, well,
341:
without you? Personally, I feel guilty sometimes for wasting my talents on RC patrol and New Pages Patrol, which any teenager can do, as opposed to cleanup, categorization, and deletion work, which require a degree of sophistication. Clearly you have the sophistication to help with requests at the
465:
Also, one note, your transclusion/substitution prevention is not allowed. By the terms of the GFDL, which you liscensed the page under, people are allowed to take, edit and use what you write here in anyway they want so long as they give the same rights to other users. people may want to substitute
540:
Hmm... looking at your contributions, edit count, and your answers to the questions below, I see you've started reverting vandalism (recently I believe, since you have 600 edits to mainspace, with most of these being the last couple of months). You currently have more edits to userspace than to
174:
Shortened sig to 3 lines (excluding timestamp). I also do some anti-vandalism work, but I am still using my sandbox instead of WP:SAND (that is probably why my userspace count is so high), and I have not signed many autograph books / requested for users to sign mine is some time now.
342:
help desk, for example (e.g. if someone wants to enhance their signature or place a colored background on their userpage). See if you can help with that, and with article writing, instead of sinking all your efforts into the never-ending game of cops and robbers.
277:: It seems you are actively building up some mainspace edits through helpful copyediting! Knowledge (XXG) never cannot have enough copyeditors, so what you're doing does certainly help. Also, your regular vandal-fighting is quite helpful as well.
241:
Great vandal-fighting work. Just a comment: you need to make sure that you always warn users after reverting their vandalism so that they know that it is unacceptable. There are a number of tools available for fighting vandalism as well, such as
541:
mainspace; try to balance that out more. A few suggestions? Don't update your status too often (I just have mine in case I'm not going to be here for a few days; I usually have it on "inandout"), and don't sign signature pages (as
Majorly said).
567:, and I learned much about policy because of two cases I took (if you join, make sure you don't take a hard case; I got frustrated with my second one, because it never got anywhere; it closed after a month, exactly where it started).
118:
Delving into the encyclopedia itself is the best direct experience you can get. When other editors start to the get the better of you, begin to read policies. But until then, pick your favorite subjects, and get to work.
516:
Doesn't matter, really, the GFDL does not allow additional restrictions, if someone wants to sub that code and work on it, they're allowed. Please leave the code out, and understand the language and values behind the GFDL.
309:. You always have approached other users politely and thoughtfully. It also seems that you have not fallen into too many edit wars with other editors which is something that one rather wants to avoid than get into.
372:
I have a high-ish mainspace count, and I believe that your statement about blinking text is a personal opinion, unless you can direct me to a policy which explicitly states that blinking text should not be used.
427:
I removed the blinking text before your comment about it, so I don't see why you're prosecuting me about something I have fixed. By the way, you may want to read the last sentence in that link you gave me.
153:. It shouldn't be more than about 2 or 3 lines. Yours is 6. Also, as Majorly said, try to spend more time on the encyclopedia, not signing autograph books or trying to build yours up. Keep working hard. --
483:
My method is not meant to discourage transclusion, it is to discourage impersonation, and if the user in question wanted code, he / she should go to the subpages on which the real code is.
799:
Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
334:
but you can learn about it easily by consulting a book or a website. Then cite your reference when you add the information. This is how
Knowledge (XXG) continues to grow.
729:
only works in
Firefox (it does not work in IE, Opera, or Safari), so if I did that (which I have no idea how to do so), no browser would display blinking text.
205:
Well, you are quite a good editor, you do great work on MOTD and a nice person. The only drawback that I know of so far is your sig, but I think that's OK now.
98:
Please cut your signature length in half, and try to avoid editing userspace (i.e. signature pages). Concentrate on your good work so far in the encyclopedia.
783:
article, as I mainly created an account to start that page, and look how far that I have come! I have also established myself as a frequent viditor to
779:
I am pleased with all of the articles that I have come across, as I have reverted about ½ of them due to vandalism. I am very pleased with the
851:
731:
673:
485:
430:
375:
177:
34:
603:
651:
Humbly requesting the removal of blinking text from your user page; it's quite distracting. Then again, perhaps that's the point.
231:
613:
837:
299:: Your signature is much more compensated now, thanks for fixing that. I don't think there's much else to gripe about that.
50:
315:: I think you are editing very constructively and all that is needed is to keep growing from here. Keep up the good work.
160:
780:
54:
290:
325:
17:
775:
Of your contributions to
Knowledge (XXG), are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
216:
122:
570:
Also, you might try to write an article on something that interests you, and maybe even try to get it to
867:
747:
689:
501:
446:
391:
318:
193:
75:
44:
23:
343:
581:
One final thing... always enjoy working here on
Knowledge (XXG). Sincerely (too much perhaps) :), ·
164:
859:
739:
681:
624:
493:
438:
383:
185:
63:
40:
784:
587:
564:
305:: I am very happy to see that there were no major problems on your record in regards to following
154:
833:
877:
840:
816:
757:
720:
699:
666:
644:
589:
529:
511:
478:
456:
422:
401:
364:
346:
327:
306:
265:
236:
169:
144:
113:
87:
813:
713:
659:
556:
is alright) :). Another great (and interesting) way to participate in wiki-space, IMHO, is in
260:
107:
582:
243:
525:
474:
418:
360:
337:
I want you to ask yourself the following question: what can you do for
Knowledge (XXG) that
227:
208:
557:
553:
549:
545:
150:
563:
Something else you might want to try is one of the dispute resolution processes. I was in
407:
575:
571:
247:
812:
I appreciate the zeal but I trust further cricketers won't receive the same treatment.
788:
829:
641:
707:
653:
252:
100:
519:
468:
412:
354:
221:
211:
671:
The only reason I have the blinking text is to get my point across.
620:
Your signature is still broken. To fix it, follow these steps:
466:
your page to a subpage to copy out chunks of code they like. -
270:
Hello
Steptrip! As per your request I'll submit my review:
725:There would be no point in my having the code, as
633:Click the "Save" button at the bottom of the page.
289:: Your edit summary usage is on the strong side:
406:Another user has already complained here, and
8:
787:, and have made some helpful minor edits to
544:You should also try to get involved in more
291:83% for major edits and 100% for minor edits
705:when the user is, in fact, using Firefox?
630:Remove the text in the "Signature:" field.
704:Perhaps you could turn off <blink: -->
612:View this user's edit summary usage with
804:this happened in a 10 minute time span).
24:Knowledge (XXG):Editor review/Steptrip 2
828:or fact in the first instance.cheers,
7:
352:crying for a little of your love. -
209:The preceding comment was signed by
601:View this user's edit count using
149:Please shorten your signature per
31:
604:Interiot's 'Wannabe Kate' Tool
1:
548:deletion discussions (I find
18:Knowledge (XXG):Editor review
896:
758:21:39, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
721:20:27, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
700:22:47, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
667:06:09, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
645:02:38, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
328:16:00, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
266:17:36, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
237:09:08, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
170:01:13, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
145:02:24, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
114:01:54, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
88:02:04, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
878:17:37, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
841:23:58, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
817:16:38, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
590:17:30, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
530:23:24, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
512:22:34, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
479:18:46, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
457:15:17, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
423:23:37, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
402:22:34, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
365:17:15, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
347:01:12, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
410:pretty well covers it. -
275:Article-space/Main-space
246:if you use Windows and
281:Knowledge (XXG)-space
250:if you use Linux. —
321:¤~Persian Poet Gal
287:Edit summary usage
527:
476:
420:
408:m:Don't be a dick
362:
339:wouldn't get done
256:
235:
168:
22:(Redirected from
887:
875:
873:
870:
865:
862:
856:
755:
753:
750:
745:
742:
736:
728:
718:
716:
710:
697:
695:
692:
687:
684:
678:
664:
662:
656:
606:
524:
522:
509:
507:
504:
499:
496:
490:
473:
471:
454:
452:
449:
444:
441:
435:
417:
415:
399:
397:
394:
389:
386:
380:
359:
357:
264:
254:
224:
219:
214:
206:
201:
199:
196:
191:
188:
182:
159:
140:
137:
134:
131:
128:
125:
110:
103:
85:
80:
73:
68:
61:
27:
895:
894:
890:
889:
888:
886:
885:
884:
871:
868:
863:
860:
858:
852:
849:Duly noted...
824:
751:
748:
743:
740:
738:
732:
726:
714:
712:
706:
693:
690:
685:
682:
680:
674:
660:
658:
652:
602:
520:
505:
502:
497:
494:
492:
486:
469:
450:
447:
442:
439:
437:
431:
413:
395:
392:
387:
384:
382:
376:
355:
251:
222:
217:
212:
197:
194:
189:
186:
184:
178:
167:
138:
135:
132:
129:
126:
123:
112:
108:
101:
81:
76:
69:
64:
55:
38:
29:
28:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
893:
891:
883:
882:
881:
880:
844:
843:
823:
820:
809:
808:
807:
806:
797:
795:
794:
793:
789:The Suite Life
767:
766:
765:
764:
763:
762:
761:
760:
648:
647:
637:
636:
635:
634:
631:
628:
617:
616:
614:mathbot's tool
609:
608:
593:
538:
537:
536:
535:
534:
533:
532:
463:
462:
461:
460:
459:
425:
331:
272:
271:
268:
239:
203:
172:
163:
147:
116:
106:
37:
32:
30:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
892:
879:
876:
874:
866:
857:
855:
848:
847:
846:
845:
842:
839:
835:
831:
826:
825:
821:
819:
818:
815:
805:
801:
800:
798:
796:
792:
790:
786:
782:
777:
776:
774:
773:
772:
771:
759:
756:
754:
746:
737:
735:
727:<span: -->
724:
723:
722:
717:
709:
703:
702:
701:
698:
696:
688:
679:
677:
670:
669:
668:
663:
655:
650:
649:
646:
643:
639:
638:
632:
629:
626:
622:
621:
619:
618:
615:
611:
610:
605:
600:
599:
598:
597:
592:
591:
588:
586:
585:
579:
577:
573:
568:
566:
561:
559:
555:
551:
547:
542:
531:
528:
526:
523:
515:
514:
513:
510:
508:
500:
491:
489:
482:
481:
480:
477:
475:
472:
464:
458:
455:
453:
445:
436:
434:
426:
424:
421:
419:
416:
409:
405:
404:
403:
400:
398:
390:
381:
379:
371:
370:
369:
368:
367:
366:
363:
361:
358:
349:
348:
345:
340:
335:
330:
329:
326:
324:
323:
322:
316:
314:
310:
308:
304:
300:
298:
294:
292:
288:
284:
282:
278:
276:
269:
267:
262:
258:
249:
245:
240:
238:
233:
229:
225:
220:
215:
210:
204:
202:
200:
192:
183:
181:
173:
171:
166:
162:
158:
157:
152:
148:
146:
143:
142:
141:
117:
115:
111:
105:
104:
97:
96:
95:
94:
90:
89:
86:
84:
79:
74:
72:
67:
62:
60:
59:
52:
49:
46:
42:
36:
33:
25:
19:
853:
850:
814:Nick mallory
810:
802:
778:
769:
768:
733:
730:
675:
672:
595:
594:
583:
580:
569:
562:
552:boring, but
543:
539:
518:
487:
484:
467:
432:
429:
411:
377:
374:
353:
350:
338:
336:
332:
320:
319:
317:
312:
311:
302:
301:
296:
295:
286:
285:
280:
279:
274:
273:
248:VandalSniper
179:
176:
155:
121:
120:
99:
92:
91:
82:
77:
70:
65:
57:
56:
47:
39:
244:VandalProof
344:YechielMan
785:WP:MOTD/N
770:Questions
640:Thanks –
625:this link
596:Comments
297:Signature
838:contribs
830:Casliber
307:WP:CIVIL
303:Civility
232:contribs
223:r:Sp3000
161:Contribs
109:(o rly?)
93:Reviews
51:contribs
41:Steptrip
35:Steptrip
715:whisper
708:Jouster
661:whisper
654:Jouster
623:Follow
313:Overall
156:TeckWiz
102:Majorly
565:MEDCAB
151:WP:SIG
16:<
834:talk
822:Zeal
781:AJMS
261:talk
228:talk
127:e Tr
45:talk
836:|
642:Qxz
574:or
558:FPC
554:MfD
550:AfD
546:XfD
257:501
255:ETS
139:ist
136:man
130:ans
872:ip
869:tr
864:ep
861:St
832:|
752:ip
749:tr
744:ep
741:St
719:)
694:ip
691:tr
686:ep
683:St
665:)
584:AO
578:.
576:FA
572:GA
560:.
506:ip
503:tr
498:ep
495:St
451:ip
448:tr
443:ep
440:St
396:ip
393:tr
388:ep
385:St
213:Us
207:--
198:ip
195:tr
190:ep
187:St
133:hu
124:Th
83:ip
78:tr
71:ep
66:St
854:~
791:.
734:~
711:(
676:~
657:(
627:.
607:.
521:M
517:-
488:~
470:M
433:~
414:M
378:~
356:M
263:)
259:(
253:M
234:)
230:•
226:(
218:e
180:~
165:@
58:~
48:·
43:(
26:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.