88:: Hey Tompw, a quick look at your talk page shows that a lot of people come to you for advice on FL's, so you must be an important person over there. I was also pleased to see that you help folks, like when they come to you for help with templates. To me that's a very important quality. In the brief look at your talk page, I saw no evidence of conflict, also a very good sign. The few user talk edits I looked at you were very friendly, helpful, and not afraid to ask questions, three more great traits. Good edit summary usage, both in consistency and usefulness of the summaries. I didn't see many major mainspace contributions in a brief look at your contribs, but I don't think that's a big deal, as long as you're making good contributions in some area. Also, I may have missed those few huge edits in the midst of all the minor ones. It looks from the count that you've contributed a great deal to some pages, so I must be missing the big edits. Crapload of talk edits, surely that's from tagging pages with templates, right? Looks like you're quite familiar with policy. You've become a mainstay in a niche that not many others work on, and you're friendly and helpful; I think you're a top-notch contributor!
46:) I've been an active member of WP for a some time now (2+ years), and have worked on a very wide range of articles (for example, those relating non-League football, elections, Nunavut, railways, mathematics...). I also specalise in templates, and am a major contributor in the Featured List process. The reason why I want to undergo editor review is to get an outside view on my methods and actions, and see where I can improve.
72:
If I had to suggest a possible improvement, I would say this: a featured list is really nothing more than a well-organized set of links to other articles. (Likewise with templates.) The true strength of such a list lies with the articles to which it links. If you think you've finished work on a
174:
I have occasionally had minor conflicts relating to the closure of
Featured List nominations. I dealt with this by explaining my actions as best I could, and so far that seems to have worked. Some disputes have caused me stress, and if I feel this is getting to much, I take a 24-hour wikibreak to
68:
I am very impressed by your content contributions and your adjudication of
Featured List candidates. I believe that the institution of Featured Lists, like Featured Articles, is intended to motivate experts to contribute their very best work. You have succeeded in that, so I commend you.
141:
210:), I'm sure he wont mind. These should test you editing skills, and show if you have any weaknesses which you can work on. So, just write your answer next to the Question. Good luck.
155:), because they brought standartds to the league articles that p[reviously had been reserved for "higher" leagues only, and also helped increase awareness of non-League club articles.
171:
Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
162:, because I was able to make the article (on a difficult area of maths) more accessible and also more useful. Since then, others have built on this, and it's now a Good Article.
73:
list, the next step is to review all the articles on that list and see what improvements you can make to those. Perhaps you are already doing that.
114:
27:
145:
123:
43:
243:
237:
231:
225:
219:
207:
159:
152:
17:
135:
Of your contributions to
Knowledge (XXG), are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
77:
301:
188:
95:
54:
37:
246:
No, but ask on talk site for a demostration that this band meets notability requirements.
201:
144:, because I helped bring 13 lists up to Featured standard. In particular, the article
298:
287:
185:
304:
101:
80:
58:
89:
47:
33:
197:
278:
Not vanadliam, but shoudl be reverted as doesn't make garmmatical sense
258:
Mild vandalism (not malicious, but still should be deleted)
151:
The non-League football league navigation boxes I created(
281:
276:
271:
266:
261:
256:
273:
Not vanadliam... removal to discussion on talk page.
148:, because no-one had done anything like that before.
8:
122:View this user's edit summary usage with
7:
113:View this user's edit count using
24:
234:Yes - looks rather like an advert
222:Yes - no substance of any kind.
146:Timeline of Canadian elections
115:Interiot's 'Wannabe Kate' Tool
1:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Editor review
283:Not vandalism,. but needs a
142:Canadian election timelines
320:
184:Additional Questions from
160:Homotopy groups of spheres
81:04:30, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
59:16:23, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
175:allow things to cool off.
305:07:46, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
102:18:38, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
214:Speedy Delete or not:
76:I wish you good luck.
268:Definately vandalism.
263:Definately vandalism.
251:Vandalism or or not:
228:Yes - trivial website
158:My contributions to
140:The Featured Topic
240:Yes - nonsensical
100:
51:
311:
292:
286:
98:
94:
92:
49:
319:
318:
314:
313:
312:
310:
309:
308:
290:
284:
96:
90:
31:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
317:
315:
295:
294:
279:
274:
269:
264:
259:
248:
247:
241:
235:
229:
223:
196:Borrowed from
181:
179:
178:
177:
176:
169:
167:
166:
165:
164:
163:
156:
149:
127:
126:
124:mathbot's tool
119:
118:
106:
30:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
316:
307:
306:
303:
300:
289:
282:
280:
277:
275:
272:
270:
267:
265:
262:
260:
257:
255:
254:
253:
252:
245:
242:
239:
236:
233:
230:
227:
224:
221:
218:
217:
216:
215:
211:
209:
206:
203:
199:
194:
193:
192:
190:
187:
173:
172:
170:
168:
161:
157:
154:
150:
147:
143:
139:
138:
137:
136:
134:
133:
132:
131:
125:
121:
120:
116:
112:
111:
110:
109:
104:
103:
99:
93:
87:
83:
82:
79:
74:
70:
66:
65:
61:
60:
56:
52:
45:
42:
39:
35:
29:
26:
19:
296:
250:
249:
213:
212:
204:
195:
183:
182:
180:
129:
128:
107:
105:
85:
84:
75:
71:
67:
63:
62:
40:
32:
297:Have fun!
78:YechielMan
153:full list
130:Questions
108:Comments
208:contribs
64:Reviews
44:contribs
91:delldot
86:Delldot
299:Dfrg.
186:Dfrg.
34:Tompw
28:Tompw
16:<
293:tag.
288:fact
244:CSD5
238:CSD4
232:CSD3
226:CSD2
220:CSD1
202:talk
198:Glen
97:talk
55:talk
38:talk
302:msc
189:msc
48:Tom
291:}}
285:{{
57:)
50:pw
205:·
200:(
191::
117:.
53:(
41:·
36:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.