116:
and no defensiveness or hostility. Plus a willingness to apologize and back down. From some of your talk page posts, it looks like you go way out of your way to be understanding and accommodating with new users and have a genuine empathy for them; you're not just following the rules. jonny-mt, you are awesome!
240:). I wrote it as a test of my own knowledge about the subject and wound up learning much more not only about transfer pricing but also about Knowledge (XXG) in general. Although it needs much more work, it is great to see that in the year since the rewrite, others have improved and expanded upon my work.
66:
and am involved in various articles related to Japan, video games, and whatever else happens to catch my eye. Although I feel I've learned a lot about
Knowledge (XXG) policies and article creation so far, I feel that now is a good time to step back, take a breather, and get some genuine feedback on
262:
I honestly can't think of any instances where I was stressed over an editing conflict, as I've never had any disagreements escalate on me. Although I'm certainly willing to revert or rewrite edits that I see as detrimental to a given article, I am also very quick to move any conflicts or issues to
115:
I think it is so great that you have a policy of helping new users and making their experiences less bitey. So many of us fail in that. We get into this routine and forget to be careful with people's feelings. I see long, really friendly responses to users who bring up issues on your talk page,
109:
more, adding more internal links and so on. And I recommend that any time you use a technical or obscure term, such as "tax compliance", you either define it or provide a link to its article. The major thing I would recommend for the article is a references section - as I'm sure you know, every
182:, maybe I'm missing them if they're hidden in with all the awesome vandalism reverting and newpage patrolling. But I saw zero civility or policy problems, so great work! You're a huge asset to the project. I'm glad I decided to do this ER so I could get the chance to become familiar with you!
143:
for A7 back in
October (yeah, I've got the detective skillz!) - note that the only things speedyable under A7 are people, groups, and websites; everything else is specifically excluded. So a theory wouldn't be speedyable under A7. I also didn't bother to read the history, so it might have been
169:
Thoughts on RFA - I'd wait (I don't think I've ever told some one not to!). You had only made about 100 edits before
October, so you'll still be seen as relatively new. I'd wait till you have at least 6 months of hardcore contributing. But as I said, I'm very cautious about
125:- maybe because Miszabot is archiving anything over 2 weeks old? ;) Maybe you should change it to a month or two, since people frequently respond to old talk comments on some pages (OK, maybe the pages I work on are more obscure, but I still think 2 weeks is a little soon).
247:
shows several instances where new users came in complaining about how I tagged their page for deletion in their first post and then came back thanking me for explaining the reasons to them in their second. I know tasks like newpage patrol and newuser patrol can be a bit
163:
as i was looking through your contribs (nosy little squirt, ain't I?): I'd leave that as a redirect to lolcat, I doubt it's that notable on its own. I mean, surely every reference that covers it would be talking about lolcats, not that site in
267:). I find that once a given discussion is out in the open, most users tend to be civil and cooperative. If something doesn't go my way, I simply consider it a lesson to be learned and applied the next time.
96:
Hi johnny-mt! Sorry you've been waiting so long for a review. It looks like you've gotten way more involved in the project in the past couple months - excellent... *grins deviously* Here's some thoughts:
135:
A quick look at your contribs shows that almost every time you warn a user for speedy deletion, it's a red link, suggesting you know what you're doing in the np patrol area. I looked into
46:) I've been a registered user of Knowledge (XXG) for a little bit over a year now, but it's only in the past couple of months that I've really become active. My most visible work is in
259:
Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
144:
speedyable under something else. This was back in
October, when you had just started contributing big time, so you probably wouldn't do the same thing these days.
121:
Similarly, I applaud your attitude toward conflicts, also a really key thing in a good editor. Couldn't find the section you were referring to in Q2 on
203:
217:
63:
76:
43:
139:, an exception, and found that the version you tagged was very speedyable. Nice work. One note - I saw that you tagged
47:
17:
122:
229:
Of your contributions to
Knowledge (XXG), are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
130:
Your interactions with other users that I looked at show you to be friendly and familiar with policy.
106:
264:
244:
72:
37:
189:
149:
Looks like you have technical knowledge, it's cool that you're using it to benefit the 'pedia!
249:
233:
179:
102:
252:
in nature, so I consider it part of my job there to help out the newbies when they need it.
59:
55:
51:
195:
80:
68:
33:
183:
90:
140:
136:
105:! A couple things you might consider for continuing your work on that would be
178:- Excellent work. I'd love to see more big contributions like that to
232:
I think the contribution I'm most proud of is my rewrite of the
263:
the talk page (this can be seen most recently in my work on
154:
I like your friendly and humorous approach to other users.
237:
160:
202:If you haven't already, please add this review to
206:to save work for those who maintain this page.
110:claim must be backed up by a reliable source.
8:
243:I am also very pleased with the fact that
62:tasks), although I also participate in
204:Knowledge (XXG):Editor review/Archives
67:how I'm doing. Thank you in advance!
7:
216:View this user's edit count using
24:
218:Interiot's 'Wannabe Kate' Tool
64:welcoming committee activities
1:
196:13:49, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
18:Knowledge (XXG):Editor review
81:02:00, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
284:
123:Talk:Super Mario Galaxy
236:article (see the diff
50:(and the accompanying
176:Overall contribution
265:Super Mario Galaxy
101:Very nice work on
207:
194:
275:
234:transfer pricing
201:
192:
188:
186:
180:transfer pricing
103:Transfer pricing
283:
282:
278:
277:
276:
274:
273:
272:
190:
184:
31:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
281:
279:
271:
270:
269:
268:
257:
255:
254:
253:
241:
221:
220:
199:
198:
172:
171:
166:
165:
156:
155:
151:
150:
146:
145:
132:
131:
127:
126:
118:
117:
112:
111:
95:
48:newpage patrol
30:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
280:
266:
261:
260:
258:
256:
251:
246:
242:
239:
235:
231:
230:
228:
227:
226:
225:
219:
215:
214:
213:
212:
208:
205:
197:
193:
187:
181:
177:
174:
173:
168:
167:
162:
158:
157:
153:
152:
148:
147:
142:
138:
134:
133:
129:
128:
124:
120:
119:
114:
113:
108:
104:
100:
99:
98:
93:
92:
87:
83:
82:
78:
74:
70:
65:
61:
57:
53:
49:
45:
42:
39:
35:
29:
26:
19:
245:my talk page
223:
222:
210:
209:
200:
175:
88:
85:
84:
40:
32:
27:
164:particular?
141:Neo slavery
137:Jonah House
159:I noticed
89:Review by
224:Questions
211:Comments
161:this edit
107:wikifying
86:Reviews
69:jonny-mt
44:contribs
34:jonny-mt
28:jonny-mt
185:delldot
91:delldot
58:, and
250:bitey
16:<
238:here
191:talk
38:talk
170:it.
60:AIV
56:AfD
52:CSD
79:)
75:)(
54:,
94::
77:c
73:t
71:(
41:·
36:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.