2457:, but his perspective of RfA's as being evil may seem to make new users think that RfA's are reviews from cold-hearted people who seem to watch every single move you make (Wikistalking). Although he made a withdrawal speech about how he would stick around, he hasn't edited anything since August 13th (his real last edit was on September 1st, but that was a dummy edit.) I'm not really sure if RfA is a good idea about appointing faithful users - I suggest abolishing RfAs and just let other administrators review an admin-canditdate's history, then let the bureaucrats appoint him/her. That way, we could avoid stress from humiliating processes and keep useful editors - I mean if an adminsitrator simply rejects you and leaves kind comments on your talk page about how to improve (instead of CRITICIZING), then the editor will keep trying and finally succeed! Whereas, if you get reviewed by several different people you haven't even met in your wikilife, it could get VERY stressful - especially when those people either don't know what they're saying, or they want to criticize instead of leaving a kind note on how to improve when they vote
1935:
hold over those certain editors? I know personally that in the past I have allowed myself to stress over things that weren't worth stressing over. However, before and after those times I have just shrugged it all away. Is it that we hold too much pride over our contributions? (I am a rambler but eventually I may tie all of this together. DOnt worry about my grammar in this particular instance.) The existence of stress may be a good thing! It tells us that people care about wikipedia -- even though they may care about their contributions moreover. Just as a marriage without arguments is abnormal a wikipedia without stress is abnormal. THis is all I have for now more to come
2372:: If you put something in, and someone else takes it out, then putting it back in again would open you up to be accused of starting an edit war. This basically means anyone can take anything out they like, without justification adn then claim you need to discuss it to bring it back in. At what point does an edit war start? Why shouldn't someone have to discuss the removal of something that was just put back in when it is not absolutely clear that the addition was not providing any benefit? Should a simple difference of opinion be enough to warrent clandestine removal of information and forcing the original author into a situation of being in an edit war as a result?
1993:(P)exists, I don't think it should be used. It should be used for the sake of recognizing that there is such a thing. However, accusing someone of breaking this rule is in my mind, akin to politically accusing someone of having a "hidden agenda". If accused of P, in some sense you are cornerned, or even felt obligated to answer. If no answer is given, it is perceived that the recipient indeed was trying to violate P (which makes it even worse). This is very hard to dissolve away, and I think there are better alternatives than using this. Unfortunately, it is all based on context... --
573:
548:
2234:
ask why are you attacking me? Why are you calling me these names? I have not attacked you!! You are the reasonable one then... and you are trying not to continue the exchange. Do not ever call someone a name back. That is what they want. At that point, they have won. Lastly, get someone else to back you up. Once another gets involved, the attack suddenly stops. Very
Important: If you are in the wrong, always say sorry immediately.
2291:. I was enthusiastic at first at being its sole maintainer (as well as a few other sections in other portals), but I feel like nobody cares about the portals at all, and my maintainment has gone down. I really do love the Reference desk now though. The science one most especially. :) I must check it a hundred times a day! I <3 Knowledge (XXG). I would never stop. I can't stop, addicted to the shin dig... la la la... —
271:
38:
1950:
when we are attacked, we tend to be defensive. I'm blabbing here too (but it makes it spontaneous and creative and much much much more useful) but it's worthwhile noting that ultimately, sometimes we just don't want to get hurt - even if we are hiding behind a pseudoname, there is still a part of us that always shines thorough. Let's face it - we
1839:
Knowledge (XXG) unfortunately lets those kinds of abusive users way too much leeway and freedoms, there is no satisfactory mechanism. In the real world such a person would have been socked a long time ago, sorry but it's true I'm not going to mince my words when it gets to such cowardly users hiding behind the internet.
2319:
You create an template and the other party modifies your template by removing a section and states that section is "irrelevant and inappropriate". You feel that the part removed was very appropriate and so you put it back in and state your case as to why it is appropriate. They then take it out again
2233:
In my experience it is best to turn the tables around. If you are really attacked by anyone, including even an admin, and it usually is an admin, especially if you are called a vandal or a troll, defend yourself vigorously, and explain and prove these insults are unfounded. If more insults come, just
2192:
I think the true source of wikistress lies in the stress reciever, not the stress deliverer. Simply put, It is the person who feels stressed out that is the problem. If someone annoys you, why bother with him/her? Just delete every message that she/he sends. If he says something rude about you, don't
1954:
care about
Knowledge (XXG), and when we're accused of hurting it in anyway, it does feel bad! I don't think the majority of intellectuals here edit-war for the purpose of getting a kick out of it - they edit war because they truly believe that what they say is fact and for the betterment of Knowledge
901:. In fact, bookmark it. Helping destress people there might already solve their problems. If you have people getting into stress due to conflict, dunk it on that page so that someone can look at it. (And if things get really tricky, there's also some pros always watching and willing to help out). :-)
2531:
is not to look for articles to Speedy Delete. However, that's just about why I often go there: as a newpage patroller. This task is useful. However, the whole deletion thing is slightly depressing because a conflict may become nascent at any moment and because it's a bit morbid being an executioner.
2270:
Your work is valuable. Remember that millions of people read
Knowledge (XXG), and even more will do so in the future. Long after you and I are dead, your words will provide a valuable historical record. I have shown articles to people at work, and they think that they must have taken years to write,
961:
When someone has a high wikistress, all we do is to suddenly rush to their talk pages and posting words of comfort. I don't oppose that. But that shouldn't be the only thing that we do. We should also investigate the cause of wikistress. So I decided to start a project for investigating the cause of
2541:
Another thing that results from both of the above is classifying users. This may add to wikistress, or may not. With RC patrol, I often have to stop myself from assuming bad faith about an IP address. With newpages, there is a strong tendency to classify users based upon "Having userpages" and "Not
1949:
I'd like to venture to say it's all of the above. All of it plays a role. The interaction on
Knowledge (XXG) is sufficiently realistic and richly complex that it causes this to happen. It's easy to get attached to what we contribute, and it's easy to get stressed. After all, we are only human - and
1388:
Why am I getting stressed out by an
Esperanza member? His talk page indicate he is very stress and he harrasses me even while we are under mediation cabal. I read that E members have to be civil, but this user is being very uncivil and harrassing me and even has a link on his user pages to monitor
2223:
In my situation, I added a lot of material to an article. Then someone deleted this material and left a rude note. I couldn't just ignore the guy or all my work would be lost. And I couldn't just revert without talking, or I'd be getting into a revert war. The guy was very rude and inflamatory. So
2101:
What an interesting concept. I am currently at 1.25. But, I am not sure if that is good or marginal or I am going to explode--though, I feel fine :-). Although I am not sure that Falcon's category encompasses all the possible things that could stress someone, I think this individual has thought
1934:
The very existence of wikistress tells us things about the nature of wikipedia itself and some of its users. First about its users, why do certain editors allow themselves to become stressed about something that they can just turn off and walk away from? Second, what kind of a hold does wikipedia
1838:
is? I can tell you all about that if you care to listen, but it would be a long talk. Yes, I definetly think that points: personal attacks, vandals, trolls, wikistalked, and the likes should be really important. I will help anyone that is the victim of such unacceptable behaviour, because I think
2309:
One thing that I have found very stressful is when someone is showing an incredibly amount of hypocricy when dealing with you. They start pointing out rules to you, drop terms like "Good Faith" when in reality they are completely ignoring the very things they are trying to rub your nose in. This
2162:
One source of stress is false reports upon a person. A user claims so & so does so & so without providing evidence and then others act on the false report because they too busy to do thoroughly unbiased investigation. A wikipedian (all are unpaid) who does a real and fair investigation
1816:
I am borrowing a concept - part of it means getting unwanted attention on
Knowledge (XXG). Essentially, some editor insists on following your contributions around, and say removing them or modifying them to irritate you. You tell them to stop, and they still bug you. They might make a bunch of
2213:
I somewhat agree. The aggressor only wants the agressee to respond negatively, thus letting the agressor know he has accomplished what he set out to do. But something like harrassment or wikistalking or anything of that extreme nature cannot and cerainly should not be blamed on the victim.
2360:. When you ask why you are told you should discuss it if you want it. They state that order is not important (ie whether it gets discussed before, during or after inclusion/reverting) yet clearly chose to revert it before discussion thus making the order very important.
2286:
Regarding the "You have new messages," yeah that is great isn't it? Although lately I've been thinking it is something I did wrong that somebody is telling me. I kinda get nervous. It always turns out to be something ok. :) My edits. No body really cares about the
1182:
In this context, an internal stress would be a stress caused by
Knowledge (XXG), or something relating to Knowledge (XXG). An external stress would be something from a user's life outside of Knowledge (XXG), such as a job, a bad relationship, or something else
2532:
In addition, I could spend 8 hours there and have my contribution page unchanged at the end. Finally, if a new page is funny (either intentionally or especially unintentionally) laughing about it may add to the guilty conscious that may be part of wikistress.
835:
Now, I've tried various things like "wikistress", "I'm upset", "I'm sad", plus "October 2005", but these searches are not as refined as I thought they would be. This is most likely because the search is not based on contextual semantics. Anyway, it's a start.
2397:
looks like he's in need of some
Wikilove. :) He sounds stressed out from something that happened on Knowledge (XXG), and he blanked his user page, replacing it with something like "Fuck it all, I'll make edits where I want, its just a fucking website." —
839:
Plus, I didn't even know there was a WikiStress 5! It seems that the people who have this are not actually stressed out, but rather like the picture instead. Or at least, this is my very preliminary interpretation of their current usage.
994:
Well, we should first determine the cause of wikistress. What I am doing here is to find a way to prevent stress before someone actually gets stressed out. The goal of this project is to prevent stress, akin to vaccinating against a
2378:
Thus I believe nothing creates more stress than someone claiming a higher moral ground, throwing terms around and claiming you have broken rules and then believing themselves totally beyond all such transgressions themselves.
2140:
The cause of wikistress is simply the time that things take. Nobody is stressed by a one second vandal fix. Its the POV pusher, the persistent vandal, the person who goes the extra mile to piss people off that causes
824:
Searching for WikiStress was a bit more difficult than I thought. I haven't looked into this very much, but one can use Google to search
Knowledge (XXG), and restrict the search to a particular site like this:
2178:
I started the stressbusters initiative, but soon I was inactive. Why? Because China banned
Knowledge (XXG). Well, now I found a way to waive it. Just thought I should make it clear. So, well... I'm back.--
1402:
my talk page after I already warned him to use the mediation page for contacting me. I warned him not to vandalize my page and reminded him to use the mediation page and he left another uncivil comment
1769:
This needs to be a bit more specific to Knowledge (XXG) I think. This list is too general - I mean, if any of these happened to me in real life, I'd feel pretty crummy too. Need more refinements! --
2256:
Noone really cares about my edits. No one really cares about the subject I edit. And I feel like I am waisting my time. My watchlist of 900 items generates some 20 completely minor edits a day.
82:
Add your name to the list - with so much enthusiasm for it (as shown above), it's hard to keep track of who's involved! HappyCamper's cursory glance...it looks like these are participants:
2341:
You are in discussion with someone on a talk page, a third party drops in and says everything you have written is garbage. You respond to that person to back up their statement with
2538:
is usually not as associated with wikistress. A lot of people are obsessed with it, and usually reverting vandalism is helpful. This is usually only bad because of the following:
1249:
Thats great. If I may then, I think HappyCamper means being stressed in the real world is closely linked to stress here on Knowledge (XXG). Is that what you mean, HappyCamper?
2445:
Although I haven't experienced one, it seems RfA's are one of the main reasons why probably tens of thousands of Wikipedians have been leaving. An example of this would be
1389:
my history. User:Stollery who claims membership of Esperanza has proven himself to be uncivil on several occasion to me and other users. Here is the most recent instance:
1855:
This is a small cause of wikistress in comparison to everything listed above, so I don't know if it belongs here, but an overloaded watchlist is easily overwhelming. --
2453:
oppositions, and 3 neutral - which forced him/her to withdraw before (s)he faces another few days of humiliation. Although I wasn't around during the time of
2310:
generates an incredible amount of stress as you do not even have a path of recourse, the other party being in total denial they have done anything wrong.
850:
Hmmm...Exir has volunteered to head up the WikiStress initative, so perhaps the two of you could discuss better ways of finding stressed Wikipedians. --
2356:
You add wiktionary links to words which historically have proven confusing, only to have them reverted with an explaination that history proves itself
52:
Either the page is no longer relevant or consensus on its purpose has become unclear. To revive discussion, seek broader input via a forum such as the
2326:: How can someone claim that you should "discuss" having something re-added to a template yet not have to "discuss" removing it in the first place?
1615:
looking at the contributions themselves. People who wish to leave tend to decrease their edits in a particular manner. Although this method will
1608:
An "external stress" is say, someone coming home from school or work, having a really bad day, and taking it out on Knowledge (XXG)/Wikipedians.
1877:
of stress off. Maybe we should look for examples of rudeness, and leave kind notes for people who were on the receiving end? What do you think?
74:). Now an inactive group; but with interesting discussions below relevant to stress assessment and future evaluation of or dealing with same.
1030:
Of course I will count you in! Just go and investigate the cause of wikistress. You can also discuss with us the way to prevent wikistress--
53:
1605:
stressed out due to something happening on Knowledge (XXG). That is to say, the stress is directly caused by something on Knowledge (XXG).
2253:
That friendly orange-yellow bar "You have new messages" appears too little, and when it does it's some spam, like Esperanza newsletter :)
1601:
I'm using terminology in a new context here. For Esperanza's purposes, let's say an "internal stress" is anything which causes a user to
2351:: A troll is someone who interferes for no other reason to cause trouble. To be called a troll by the person interrupting causes stress.
981:
I wonder if there is a way to pre-emptively determine when WikiStress comes in? I think there is. What might you be looking at here? --
17:
2336:
yet the other party failed to assume good faith and try to find out what you intended with the item in question in the first place?
2151:
Totally true. I think a rule should be established to BAN people who push POV, and who Harass other users (Is there such a rule?)--
2058:
respectfully, even then. E.g. "You appear to not be editing in a constructive way. Regrettably I have to refer this dispute to the
1788:
Hmmm... The list is a start. I personally think that it might need to be refined, but it is pretty good. Well done Happycamper!--
2492:
2579:
2182:
2523:
New Pages Patrol and Recent Changes Patrol for vandalism, even doing it correctly and without conflict, may add to wikistress.
922:
Try to find the worst WikiStress meter you can find, and check the "File links" at the bottom of the image, that should work —
284:
1317:
637:
259:
2410:
1448:
279:
2553:
The above has occured to me in solely trace amounts. But there may be others who suffer from these potential symptoms.
201:
411:
2082:
1519:
Hmm...I think we need to change the phrase slightly. It sounds too mysterious...too much like a fortune cookie :-) --
1528:
What do you want to put there? I can't think of anything... but if you think of something, tell me, or go ahead and
1406:
1056:
Could we create a 'conference room' of sorts? A sole page devoted to setting research goals, methods, and the like?
1892:
1711:
Debating on the various deletion pages such as AfD - especially when it comes to contentious issues such as schools
680:
2197:
2013:
1888:
1794:
1487:
1233:
1146:
1083:
1036:
1001:
968:
877:
466:
228:
70:
2125:
2090:
1940:
1316:
Of course you can have a conference room (and you don't have to ask me, I'm just a figurehead ;-) ) What about
810:
589:
566:
419:
2345:. You are now called a troll because you want them to justify their blatantly rude and unjustified intrusion.
1960:
Anyway, more ramblings...but very very useful. Once we are done, the trick is to go back and comb out all the
357:
1494:
1466:
2485:
1779:
1427:
923:
500:
264:
132:
2565:
2504:
2499:
2422:
2417:
2383:
2275:
2263:
2238:
2228:
2218:
2207:
2167:
2155:
2145:
2130:
2114:
2095:
2066:
2033:
2020:
1997:
1972:
1943:
1921:
1916:
1903:
1881:
1864:
1845:
1821:
1801:
1782:
1773:
1681:
1662:
1635:
1623:
1580:
1566:
1541:
1523:
1506:
1478:
1460:
1441:
1413:
1382:
1372:
1348:
1328:
1310:
1280:
1265:
1240:
1221:
1187:
1153:
1115:
1090:
1060:
1043:
1021:
1008:
985:
975:
944:
905:
884:
858:
844:
813:
802:
777:
768:
751:
723:
704:
666:
650:
617:
604:
592:
541:
518:
474:
450:
442:
437:
428:
402:
395:
349:
336:
328:
320:
296:
204:
196:
188:
178:
161:
148:
103:
2478:
2202:
2018:
1859:
1799:
1575:
1536:
1501:
1473:
1455:
1255:
1238:
1211:
1151:
1088:
1041:
1006:
973:
882:
729:
627:
612:
581:
556:
529:
513:
485:
386:
344:
274:
233:
184:
113:
95:
2535:
2366:: Why should you have to discuss putting something back in yet they don't have to discuss taking it out?
1277:
1184:
783:
760:
534:
458:
316:
305:
156:
2495:, which goes along the same lines of helping people to relax about less-than-positive RfA outcomes. --
2063:
45:
37:
23:
2449:
reason of leaving. This guy looked like he was dissapointed; his RfA failed with a final 14 Supports,
2562:
2194:
2179:
2152:
2008:
1789:
1228:
1141:
1078:
1031:
996:
963:
872:
510:
393:
368:
223:
193:
166:
64:
354:
2430:
2401:
2294:
2121:
2086:
2081:
I haven't checked to see if this user is a member of Esperanza but nonetheless I found this essay:
1936:
1912:
for taking it! It's certainly a relaxing picture, I'm sure the recipients have appreciated it. --
1369:
1361:
1057:
1018:
807:
642:
586:
578:
561:
551:
496:
362:
311:
145:
137:
2461:
2215:
2059:
1740:
746:
333:
1896:
598:
2043:
2004:
1990:
1980:
1750:
1721:
898:
1899:. (I stole the garden image from Natalya -- Thanks, Natalya!) Does this seem like a good idea?
1611:
I don't know...just an idea...Personally, I think we can do this just by analysing edit counts
2491:
While abolishing RfAs might be a tough thing to get to happen, you might be interested in the
1343:
1305:
632:
572:
547:
471:
463:
252:
1720:
Being falsely accused of something such as biting newbies or violating a commandment such as
1529:
2528:
2380:
2225:
2164:
1994:
1969:
1900:
1878:
1818:
1770:
1678:
1652:
1632:
1620:
1563:
1520:
1438:
1410:
1379:
1325:
1274:
1112:
982:
902:
855:
841:
713:
689:
672:
524:
455:
341:
301:
213:
153:
2516:
1730:
1405:
His most recent message at my talk page included general incivility which I have archived:
1364:
1295:
868:
656:
242:
140:
2554:
2454:
2446:
2163:
should be honored and those who don't should be accessory to the crime of false report. --
1840:
1140:
Forgive my English, but what are the differences between internal and external stresses?--
506:
378:
325:
291:
2550:
This could lead to faster growth of wikistress, even if it does not contribute directly.
1746:
1736:
1631:
Blah blah blah...I don't think we really need this jargon anyway :-) Stress is stress! --
1955:(XXG). It's a hard pill to swallow if someone says to you: "You know, you're not right!"
2471:
2288:
2107:
1423:
By the way, for those using the coffee image, I've created a template to make it easy:
739:
490:
480:
2224:
sometimes there's only so much you can do, unless you want to give up on the article.
871:. The users that requests meditation usually has a high stress rate (or so it seems)--
2573:
2320:
and tell you that you should go to the talk page if you want to have it included????
2142:
1657:
1649:
930:
800:
718:
710:
125:
100:
92:
2496:
2414:
2260:
1913:
1909:
1873:
of stress to someone, if they're persistent. And one or two kind people can take a
1856:
1714:
Getting a new article (or any article you are involved in general) AfD'd/TfD'd etc.
1338:
1320:? If you'd like, I'll make you an official Esperanza Stress Unit insignia. ;-) --
1300:
1290:
774:
622:
447:
434:
247:
237:
2120:
At this time mine happens to be -1! Please don't be jealous you worry warts! =)
270:
2358:(clearly incorrect otherwise there wouldn't be such confusion in the first place)
2272:
2235:
2102:
about Wikistress in such a way that they would be an asset to the Stress Unit.
1572:
1533:
1498:
1470:
1452:
1434:
1321:
851:
765:
757:
647:
609:
209:
2394:
1260:
1250:
1216:
1206:
937:
701:
697:
217:
118:
108:
86:
1451:
page, so it's easier for us to find users who are a little bit stressed out.
2466:
2303:
734:
661:
477:- I really think we should make our own theme song based on Ghostbusters:P.
2042:
These things do serve an important function. Perhaps we could agree that
788:
1378:
Because I got confused :-) Feel free to merge the two lists together. --
2029:
1699:
Being nominated for Adminship/Bureaucratship/MedCom/ArbCom et cetera...
1986:
Hmm...more analysis...I think the easiest one to address is "POINT".
2062:. I hope this can be resolved with a minimum of ill feeling"... --
2027:
That's a good idea :). Obviously claiming bad faith is bad too :)
1817:
sockpuppets with offensive usernames and draw attention to you. --
2055:
only after several attempts at engaging the user in civil dialog,
2546:
hh:mm, # Month 200* USERNAME (hist) USERNAME (Talk | contribs)
1469:
for easy listing of users who have been identified as stressed.
32:
728:
Excessive stress can be dangerous, which is why we're here.
1759:
Having to explain etiquette to Administrators who have none
830:
site:en.wikipedia.org <stuff you want to search for: -->
1869:
I've noticed that one or two rude people can really add a
2083:
Falcon Kirtaran's Numerical Representation for WikiStress
1717:
Being signed up for too much (i.e. too many WikiProjects)
1403:
1400:
1397:
1390:
1205:
Please...can I be counted in too? (With a small voice)
2409:
Thanks for pointing that out. You should add him too
1968:- then, we will have a very good list to work with. --
1111:
Are we focussing on internal or external stresses? --
1648:
Either contribute, but a combination is what hurts.
782:
Been doing what I can already, might as well join!—
44:
This page is currently inactive and is retained for
828:To search only in English Knowledge (XXG), type in
2332:: When someone tells you that your revert was in
2007:can make a lot of users feel less stressed out.--
2542:having userpages". Especially vanity pages like
2085:. Might be usefull for our fight of wikistress!
1693:Being scrutinized, such as in peer review or FAC
962:wikistress. Anyone intrested in participating?--
2046:and accusations of "bad faith" should be used:
1447:By the way, I added a lot of categories to the
1807:PS. I have a question though... What is being
2493:proposed program about moral support for RfAs
8:
1708:Not being able to get an FPC or FAC approved
2259:I love Knowledge (XXG) too much too quit.
1778:Heck I felt stressed after I lost my RFA.
1756:Being threatened by unruly Administrators
1356:Count me in. I'm confused however by the
2271:and have been written by professionals.
67:to investigate the cause of wikistress (
2413:, so that more people can find out. --
24:Knowledge (XXG):Esperanza/Stressbusters
1979:Why Wikipedians should avoid claiming
1726:Being falsely accused of sockpuppetry.
957:Investigating the cause of wikistress.
2250:Real life and wiki are incompactible.
1762:Being banned on WP by your opposition
1392:Here are some past uncivil behavior:
18:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Wikidemia
7:
1318:Knowledge (XXG):Esperanza/StressUnit
2193:say something back. Just ignore. --
1360:lists of members above. Why two? --
63:The "Stressbusters" was founded by
2173:
1765:High profile Vandal interventions.
1394:Judgmental tone in edit summaries:
756:WikiStress needs to be removed! --
31:
1702:Opposing a nomination of any sort
1077:I have to ask essjay about that--
69:formerly an Esperanza project at
2411:Knowledge (XXG):Esperanza/Alerts
571:
546:
269:
36:
2174:Why I wasn't active for so long
1729:Being on the receiving end of
1663:09:23, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
1597:Internal and external stresses
1407:User talk:Nikitchenko/Stollery
1285:I'm in - as long as I can be "
1273:I think this is a great idea.
752:02:06, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
724:09:21, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
1:
2188:The true source of wikistress
1908:The real thanks should go to
814:13:29, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
705:10:23, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
593:15:18, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
189:19:44, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
2566:21:41, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
2131:17:01, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
2115:15:22, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
2096:21:41, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
2034:10:21, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
2021:10:17, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
1998:19:52, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
1865:16:19, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
1846:21:33, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
1581:01:03, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
1567:21:02, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
906:11:21, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
820:In the search for WikiStress
803:05:21, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
778:22:29, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
769:20:42, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
519:04:17, 2 November 2005 (UTC)
396:09:47, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
350:02:42, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
329:19:16, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
321:04:24, 2 November 2005 (UTC)
2505:03:18, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
2486:23:10, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
2423:00:41, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
2201:<font color = green: -->
1973:15:18, 9 October 2005 (UTC)
1944:05:54, 9 October 2005 (UTC)
1887:I've started doing that on
1822:14:19, 9 October 2005 (UTC)
1802:12:00, 9 October 2005 (UTC)
1774:17:05, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
1735:Being bothered by annoying
1705:AfD voting with sockpuppets
1682:16:18, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
1636:16:17, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
1624:03:37, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
1542:23:00, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
1524:22:58, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
1507:22:49, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
1479:07:13, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
1461:22:28, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
1442:21:17, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
1383:20:53, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
1373:20:09, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
1349:20:43, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
1329:20:39, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
1311:17:04, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
1287:Detective Inspector FireFox
1281:16:43, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
1266:14:07, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
1241:13:09, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
1222:12:17, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
1154:13:09, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
1116:10:42, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
1091:04:01, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
1061:03:50, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
1044:03:46, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
1022:03:40, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
1009:03:46, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
986:03:17, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
976:01:26, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
885:06:18, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
859:20:41, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
845:00:31, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
618:22:47, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
297:22:09, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
149:20:09, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
104:05:26, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
2596:
2208:00:21, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
2183:00:03, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
2156:00:05, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
2146:13:01, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
2052:only with very good cause,
1893:User talk:ScienceApologist
1396:"...ridiculous assumption"
1188:02:57, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
605:23:11, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
542:01:12, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
451:18:41, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
443:18:09, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
429:07:54, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
197:20:00, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
78:Stressbusters participants
2384:23:48, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
2229:14:48, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
2219:01:40, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
2067:07:29, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
1922:03:37, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
1904:15:17, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
1889:User talk:Commander Keane
1882:20:20, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
1677:Let's brainstorm here. --
945:19:20, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
643:Chat with Tdxiang on IRC!
475:00:59, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
337:01:28, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
2517:Speedy deleletion patrol
2276:12:18, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
2245:My reasons for my stress
2239:13:56, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
2168:19:24, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
1562:Well, I changed it... --
1414:19:18, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
1337:Ooo wow... sounds good.
667:10:51, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
651:12:11, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
398:(like my new signature?)
205:00:11, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
2264:21:57, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
1783:21:39, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
1495:Category:Stressed Users
1467:Stressed Users category
773:Reporting for duty! :)
373:23:15, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
162:07:06, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
2580:Inactive project pages
2077:Interesting user essay
1493:is ready, and adds to
2536:Special:recentchanges
2136:I have figured it out
1989:Even though the page
1571:I saw. Good work! :)
1834:You wanna know what
65:User:Exir Kamalabadi
1696:Being "WikiStalked"
1690:Being put up on RFC
1465:And I've created a
1399:Stollery vandalizes
2427:Oh, ok, thanks. —
2389:User stress alert!
2003:Avoiding claiming
1897:User talk:Jim62sch
1780:General Eisenhower
2484:
2441:Stress from RFA's
2282:Same reasons here
2049:very very rarely,
2032:
1673:List of stressors
1661:
750:
722:
501:How's my driving?
415:
133:Brian New Zealand
61:
60:
22:(Redirected from
2587:
2560:
2557:
2529:Special:newpages
2502:
2481:
2476:
2474:
2469:
2464:
2420:
2128:
2112:
2093:
2028:
2016:
2011:
1919:
1862:
1843:
1797:
1792:
1731:personal attacks
1660:
1655:
1619:be foolproof. --
1578:
1539:
1504:
1492:
1488:Esperanza Voyage
1486:
1476:
1458:
1432:
1426:
1367:
1346:
1341:
1308:
1303:
1298:
1293:
1263:
1258:
1253:
1236:
1231:
1219:
1214:
1209:
1149:
1144:
1086:
1081:
1039:
1034:
1004:
999:
971:
966:
942:
935:
928:
880:
875:
798:
796:
793:
786:
763:
744:
742:
737:
732:
721:
716:
694:
692:
687:
686:
678:
677:
664:
659:
640:
635:
630:
625:
615:
601:
584:
575:
569:
564:
559:
554:
550:
539:
538:
532:
527:
516:
493:
488:
483:
469:
440:
426:
417:
416:
414:
409:
391:
384:
371:
360:
347:
294:
287:
282:
277:
273:
267:
262:
255:
250:
245:
240:
231:
226:
182:
175:
174:
171:
159:
143:
128:
121:
116:
111:
98:
57:
40:
33:
27:
2595:
2594:
2590:
2589:
2588:
2586:
2585:
2584:
2570:
2569:
2558:
2555:
2527:The purpose of
2513:
2500:
2479:
2472:
2467:
2462:
2443:
2440:
2418:
2391:
2370:Poor Wiki Rules
2316:
2307:
2284:
2247:
2190:
2180:Exir Kamalabadi
2176:
2153:Exir Kamalabadi
2138:
2126:
2108:
2091:
2079:
2014:
2009:
1984:
1932:
1930:More discussion
1917:
1860:
1841:
1795:
1790:
1745:Being called a
1675:
1653:
1599:
1576:
1537:
1502:
1490:
1484:
1483:Reporting that
1474:
1456:
1430:
1424:
1421:
1365:
1344:
1339:
1306:
1301:
1296:
1291:
1261:
1256:
1251:
1234:
1229:
1227:Everyone can!--
1217:
1212:
1207:
1147:
1142:
1084:
1079:
1037:
1032:
1002:
997:
969:
964:
959:
938:
931:
924:
878:
873:
822:
794:
791:
789:
784:
761:
740:
735:
730:
714:
690:
682:
681:
675:
673:
671:
662:
657:
638:
633:
628:
623:
613:
599:
582:
567:
562:
557:
552:
536:
535:
530:
525:
514:
491:
486:
481:
467:
438:
425:
420:
413:
412:
408:
403:
387:
379:
369:
358:
345:
292:
285:
280:
275:
265:
260:
253:
248:
243:
238:
229:
224:
179:
172:
169:
168:
157:
141:
126:
119:
114:
109:
96:
80:
51:
29:
28:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
2593:
2591:
2583:
2582:
2572:
2571:
2548:
2547:
2525:
2524:
2512:
2509:
2508:
2507:
2442:
2439:
2438:
2437:
2436:
2435:
2390:
2387:
2376:
2375:
2374:
2373:
2367:
2354:
2353:
2352:
2339:
2338:
2337:
2327:
2315:
2312:
2306:
2300:
2289:Science portal
2283:
2280:
2279:
2278:
2267:
2266:
2257:
2254:
2251:
2246:
2243:
2242:
2241:
2231:
2221:
2205:</font: -->
2189:
2186:
2175:
2172:
2171:
2170:
2159:
2158:
2137:
2134:
2122:Jaberwocky6669
2118:
2117:
2087:Jaberwocky6669
2078:
2075:
2074:
2073:
2072:
2071:
2070:
2069:
2056:
2053:
2050:
2037:
2036:
2024:
2023:
1983:
1977:
1976:
1975:
1957:
1956:
1937:Jaberwocky6669
1931:
1928:
1927:
1926:
1925:
1924:
1853:
1852:
1851:
1850:
1849:
1848:
1827:
1826:
1825:
1824:
1805:
1804:
1767:
1766:
1763:
1760:
1757:
1754:
1743:
1733:
1727:
1724:
1718:
1715:
1712:
1709:
1706:
1703:
1700:
1697:
1694:
1691:
1688:
1674:
1671:
1670:
1669:
1668:
1667:
1666:
1665:
1641:
1640:
1639:
1638:
1598:
1595:
1594:
1593:
1592:
1591:
1590:
1589:
1588:
1587:
1586:
1585:
1584:
1583:
1551:
1550:
1549:
1548:
1547:
1546:
1545:
1544:
1512:
1511:
1510:
1509:
1463:
1428:Cafe Esperanza
1420:
1417:
1386:
1385:
1354:
1353:
1352:
1351:
1332:
1331:
1271:
1270:
1269:
1268:
1244:
1243:
1203:
1202:
1201:
1200:
1199:
1198:
1197:
1196:
1195:
1194:
1193:
1192:
1191:
1190:
1167:
1166:
1165:
1164:
1163:
1162:
1161:
1160:
1159:
1158:
1157:
1156:
1127:
1126:
1125:
1124:
1123:
1122:
1121:
1120:
1119:
1118:
1100:
1099:
1098:
1097:
1096:
1095:
1094:
1093:
1068:
1067:
1066:
1065:
1064:
1063:
1058:Jaberwocky6669
1049:
1048:
1047:
1046:
1025:
1024:
1019:Jaberwocky6669
1014:
1013:
1012:
1011:
989:
988:
958:
955:
954:
953:
952:
951:
950:
949:
948:
947:
913:
912:
911:
910:
909:
908:
890:
889:
888:
887:
862:
861:
821:
818:
817:
816:
805:
780:
771:
754:
726:
707:
700:- looks good!
695:
669:
653:
645:
620:
607:
595:
576:
544:
521:
504:
478:
461:
453:
445:
431:
421:
404:
399:
376:
374:
365:
352:
339:
331:
323:
309:
299:
289:
257:
235:
221:
207:
199:
191:
164:
151:
135:
130:
123:
106:
89:
79:
76:
59:
58:
50:
41:
30:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2592:
2581:
2578:
2577:
2575:
2568:
2567:
2563:
2561:
2551:
2545:
2544:
2543:
2539:
2537:
2533:
2530:
2522:
2521:
2520:
2518:
2510:
2506:
2503:
2498:
2494:
2490:
2489:
2488:
2487:
2482:
2475:
2470:
2465:
2460:
2456:
2452:
2448:
2434:
2432:
2426:
2425:
2424:
2421:
2416:
2412:
2408:
2407:
2406:
2405:
2403:
2396:
2388:
2386:
2385:
2382:
2371:
2368:
2365:
2362:
2361:
2359:
2355:
2350:
2347:
2346:
2344:
2340:
2335:
2331:
2328:
2325:
2322:
2321:
2318:
2317:
2313:
2311:
2305:
2301:
2299:
2298:
2296:
2290:
2281:
2277:
2274:
2269:
2268:
2265:
2262:
2258:
2255:
2252:
2249:
2248:
2244:
2240:
2237:
2232:
2230:
2227:
2222:
2220:
2217:
2212:
2211:
2210:
2209:
2206:</sup: -->
2204:
2199:
2196:
2187:
2185:
2184:
2181:
2169:
2166:
2161:
2160:
2157:
2154:
2150:
2149:
2148:
2147:
2144:
2141:wikistress.--
2135:
2133:
2132:
2129:
2123:
2116:
2113:
2111:
2106:
2100:
2099:
2098:
2097:
2094:
2088:
2084:
2076:
2068:
2065:
2061:
2057:
2054:
2051:
2048:
2047:
2045:
2041:
2040:
2039:
2038:
2035:
2031:
2026:
2025:
2022:
2019:
2017:
2012:
2006:
2002:
2001:
2000:
1999:
1996:
1992:
1987:
1982:
1978:
1974:
1971:
1967:
1963:
1959:
1958:
1953:
1948:
1947:
1946:
1945:
1942:
1938:
1929:
1923:
1920:
1915:
1911:
1907:
1906:
1905:
1902:
1898:
1894:
1890:
1886:
1885:
1884:
1883:
1880:
1876:
1872:
1867:
1866:
1863:
1858:
1847:
1844:
1837:
1833:
1832:
1831:
1830:
1829:
1828:
1823:
1820:
1815:
1814:
1813:
1812:
1811:
1810:
1803:
1800:
1798:
1793:
1787:
1786:
1785:
1784:
1781:
1776:
1775:
1772:
1764:
1761:
1758:
1755:
1752:
1748:
1744:
1742:
1738:
1734:
1732:
1728:
1725:
1723:
1719:
1716:
1713:
1710:
1707:
1704:
1701:
1698:
1695:
1692:
1689:
1686:
1685:
1684:
1683:
1680:
1672:
1664:
1659:
1656:
1651:
1647:
1646:
1645:
1644:
1643:
1642:
1637:
1634:
1630:
1629:
1628:
1627:
1626:
1625:
1622:
1618:
1614:
1609:
1606:
1604:
1596:
1582:
1579:
1574:
1570:
1569:
1568:
1565:
1561:
1560:
1559:
1558:
1557:
1556:
1555:
1554:
1553:
1552:
1543:
1540:
1535:
1531:
1527:
1526:
1525:
1522:
1518:
1517:
1516:
1515:
1514:
1513:
1508:
1505:
1500:
1496:
1489:
1482:
1481:
1480:
1477:
1472:
1468:
1464:
1462:
1459:
1454:
1450:
1446:
1445:
1444:
1443:
1440:
1436:
1429:
1418:
1416:
1415:
1412:
1408:
1404:
1401:
1398:
1395:
1391:
1384:
1381:
1377:
1376:
1375:
1374:
1371:
1368:
1363:
1359:
1350:
1347:
1342:
1336:
1335:
1334:
1333:
1330:
1327:
1323:
1319:
1315:
1314:
1313:
1312:
1309:
1304:
1299:
1294:
1288:
1283:
1282:
1279:
1276:
1267:
1264:
1259:
1254:
1248:
1247:
1246:
1245:
1242:
1239:
1237:
1232:
1226:
1225:
1224:
1223:
1220:
1215:
1210:
1189:
1186:
1185:Armedblowfish
1181:
1180:
1179:
1178:
1177:
1176:
1175:
1174:
1173:
1172:
1171:
1170:
1169:
1168:
1155:
1152:
1150:
1145:
1139:
1138:
1137:
1136:
1135:
1134:
1133:
1132:
1131:
1130:
1129:
1128:
1117:
1114:
1110:
1109:
1108:
1107:
1106:
1105:
1104:
1103:
1102:
1101:
1092:
1089:
1087:
1082:
1076:
1075:
1074:
1073:
1072:
1071:
1070:
1069:
1062:
1059:
1055:
1054:
1053:
1052:
1051:
1050:
1045:
1042:
1040:
1035:
1029:
1028:
1027:
1026:
1023:
1020:
1017:Count me in!
1016:
1015:
1010:
1007:
1005:
1000:
993:
992:
991:
990:
987:
984:
980:
979:
978:
977:
974:
972:
967:
956:
946:
943:
941:
936:
934:
929:
927:
921:
920:
919:
918:
917:
916:
915:
914:
907:
904:
900:
896:
895:
894:
893:
892:
891:
886:
883:
881:
876:
870:
866:
865:
864:
863:
860:
857:
853:
849:
848:
847:
846:
843:
837:
833:
831:
826:
819:
815:
812:
809:
806:
804:
801:
799:
787:
781:
779:
776:
772:
770:
767:
764:
759:
755:
753:
748:
743:
738:
733:
727:
725:
720:
717:
712:
708:
706:
703:
699:
696:
693:
688:
685:
679:
670:
668:
665:
660:
654:
652:
649:
646:
644:
641:
636:
631:
626:
621:
619:
616:
611:
608:
606:
603:
602:
600:Tijuana Brass
596:
594:
591:
588:
585:
580:
577:
574:
570:
565:
560:
555:
549:
545:
543:
540:
533:
528:
522:
520:
517:
512:
508:
505:
502:
498:
494:
489:
484:
479:
476:
473:
470:
465:
462:
460:
457:
454:
452:
449:
446:
444:
441:
436:
432:
430:
427:
424:
418:
410:
407:
400:
397:
394:
392:
390:
385:
383:
377:
375:
372:
366:
364:
361:
356:
353:
351:
348:
343:
340:
338:
335:
332:
330:
327:
324:
322:
319:
318:
313:
310:
307:
303:
300:
298:
295:
290:
288:
283:
278:
272:
268:
263:
258:
256:
251:
246:
241:
236:
234:
232:
227:
222:
219:
215:
211:
208:
206:
203:
200:
198:
195:
192:
190:
187:
186:
183:
181:
177:
176:
165:
163:
160:
155:
152:
150:
147:
144:
139:
136:
134:
131:
129:
124:
122:
117:
112:
107:
105:
102:
99:
94:
90:
88:
85:
84:
83:
77:
75:
73:
72:
71:WP:ESP/STRESS
66:
55:
49:
47:
42:
39:
35:
34:
25:
19:
2552:
2549:
2540:
2534:
2526:
2514:
2458:
2450:
2447:Funnybunny's
2444:
2428:
2399:
2392:
2377:
2369:
2363:
2357:
2348:
2342:
2333:
2329:
2323:
2308:
2302:Stress from
2292:
2285:
2200:<sup: -->
2191:
2177:
2139:
2119:
2109:
2103:
2080:
2064:Singkong2005
1988:
1985:
1965:
1961:
1951:
1933:
1874:
1870:
1868:
1854:
1835:
1809:Wikistalked?
1808:
1806:
1777:
1768:
1676:
1616:
1612:
1610:
1607:
1602:
1600:
1422:
1419:Coffee image
1393:
1387:
1357:
1355:
1286:
1284:
1272:
1204:
960:
939:
932:
925:
838:
834:
829:
827:
823:
683:
597:
422:
405:
388:
381:
314:
185:
180:
167:
81:
68:
62:
54:village pump
43:
2381:Enigmatical
2226:Sarah crane
2165:Nikitchenko
2030:Ryan Norton
1995:HappyCamper
1970:HappyCamper
1901:Sarah crane
1879:Sarah crane
1836:Wikistalked
1819:HappyCamper
1771:HappyCamper
1687:POV pushing
1679:HappyCamper
1633:HappyCamper
1621:HappyCamper
1564:HappyCamper
1521:HappyCamper
1411:Nikitchenko
1380:HappyCamper
1275:Paul August
1113:HappyCamper
983:HappyCamper
903:Kim Bruning
842:HappyCamper
456:Paul August
342:Krashlandon
302:J.Steinbock
154:Computerjoe
2455:Funnybunny
2395:User:Zpb52
2198:Kamalabadi
2110:Roby Wayne
2015:Kamalabadi
1966:adjectives
1842:Gryffindor
1796:Kamalabadi
1753:, or worse
1370:stianpower
1235:Kamalabadi
1148:Kamalabadi
1085:Kamalabadi
1038:Kamalabadi
1003:Kamalabadi
970:Kamalabadi
879:Kamalabadi
747:Spider-Man
472:rfectStorm
293:Gryffindor
230:Kamalabadi
218:Ex officio
194:Davidpk212
146:stianpower
48:reference.
46:historical
2511:New pages
2364:Hypocricy
2349:Hypocricy
2334:bad faith
2330:Hypocricy
2324:Hypocricy
2304:Hypocricy
2203:Esperanza
995:disease--
326:JDH Owens
306:Talk Page
2574:Category
2314:Examples
2143:Urthogie
2044:WP:POINT
2005:WP:POINT
1991:WP:POINT
1981:WP:POINT
1722:WP:POINT
899:WP:TINMC
709:I'm in.
526:Slipknot
363:at Llama
317:watz sup
286:senhower
127:Bratsche
1910:Fir0002
1737:Vandals
1613:without
1530:be bold
811:Collins
775:Randfan
691:edSpan
563:nnessee
492:dwolf24
448:Omni ND
312:JAranda
158:'s talk
2497:Nataly
2459:oppose
2415:Nataly
2273:Wallie
2261:Renata
2236:Wallie
2216:K-UNIT
2060:ArbCom
1914:Nataly
1895:, and
1857:Nataly
1747:Vandal
1741:Trolls
1650:Dfrg.m
1603:appear
1449:Alerts
1435:Essjay
1322:Essjay
897:Go to
869:WP:RFM
867:Go to
852:Essjay
808:Skully
790:ditor
711:Dfrg.m
648:Wallie
435:Nataly
355:The Gr
334:K-UNIT
266:eneral
210:Essjay
2559:notes
2556:Grace
2515:(see
2393:Cool
2343:facts
2104:: -->
1962:verbs
1751:Troll
1289:" :P
702:Jam01
698:Jam01
590:e Ong
93:Ariad
87:5aret
16:<
2431:talk
2402:talk
2295:talk
2195:Exir
2010:Exir
1964:and
1791:Exir
1749:, a
1739:and
1573:Tito
1534:Tito
1499:Tito
1471:Tito
1453:Tito
1439:Talk
1409:. --
1340:Fire
1326:Talk
1230:Exir
1143:Exir
1080:Exir
1033:Exir
998:Exir
965:Exir
874:Exir
856:Talk
797:arge
610:Tito
568:Wood
507:Sean
497:talk
382:writ
380:Mama
367:M2K
225:Exir
214:Talk
1875:lot
1871:lot
1617:not
1437:·
1433:--
1362:Cel
1358:two
1345:Fox
1324:·
1292:Fir
1252:Ban
1208:Ban
854:·
766:nmy
663:cds
655:--
579:Ter
511:Bla
433:--
346:(e)
239:Fir
212:·
202:EMC
173:ota
170:Dak
138:Cel
110:Ban
2576::
2564:§
2519:)
2468:GF
2451:25
2124:|
2089:|
1952:do
1939:|
1891:,
1577:xd
1538:xd
1532:.
1503:xd
1497:.
1491:}}
1485:{{
1475:xd
1457:xd
1431:}}
1425:{{
1302:Fo
940:un
933:in
840:--
832:.
792:at
758:Sk
736:GF
639:贡献
614:xd
587:nc
537:22
523:--
515:ck
401:--
389:es
315:|
249:Fo
101:ss
91:--
2501:a
2483:)
2480:@
2477:(
2473:F
2463:S
2433:)
2429:(
2419:a
2404:)
2400:(
2297:)
2293:(
2127:☎
2105::
2092:☎
1941:☎
1918:a
1861:a
1658:c
1654:s
1366:e
1307:x
1297:e
1278:☎
1262:s
1257:e
1218:s
1213:e
926:M
795:L
785:E
762:e
749:)
745:(
741:F
731:S
719:c
715:s
684:e
676:l
674:B
658:9
634:翔
629:鼎
624:陈
583:e
558:e
553:T
531:2
509:|
503:)
499:—
495:(
487:e
482:R
468:e
464:P
459:☎
439:a
423:P
406:M
370:e
359:e
308:)
304:(
281:i
276:E
261:G
254:x
244:e
220:)
216:(
142:e
120:s
115:e
97:o
56:.
26:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
