104:, and even before actual commencement of filming, has allowed in some cases a guideline encouraged consideration of a common sense exception: the creation of articles on well-documented "film project". Such articles are not treated in the same manner as a "film" article. This consideration of the policy allowance toward well documented "future" events has caused some debate on which upcoming films might qualify as acceptable topics.
147:? That even if the supposed future film is revealed to never happen, it could probably still stand out as an article on its own per all the coverage and hype it's gone through to prove notability. That can help being beneficial to knowing that the article meets requirements of a film project article on its own. The only way to know that is by checking its
35:
209:
but with "(film project)" added. If there are no other words that can refer to the title that can appear in disambiguation pages etc., then the movie title may stay as is. If placing "film project" on the title make sure you place italics on the planned movie title to separate "film project" from
159:. It must have over ten external sources to prove verifiability and preferably somewhere around 5 or more different sites that it's covered on. The article cannot be a stub and should automatically be stated as Start Class. As for when it can be acceptable the film should mainly be in
267:
This humorous phrase simply means don't get overboard with it. Sure some film project articles can live up to
Knowledge standards but that doesn't mean every film is deserving of their "film project" article and can live up to Knowledge guidelines. So be
200:
Film articles have their own manual of style. As do the film project articles as well. The golden rule of creating a film project is to never treat it like a film but as an article whose topic is a film that is in negotiations.
163:. If the information of the certain film is on a certain page and there is excessive amount of sourced information on that particular film, it may be acceptable to divide it as a "film project" article on its own per
213:
Key words for a film's project article are future tense words such as "planned", "intended", or "proposed"... and such must used in the article's lede section to clarify that the article is not about a "made" film.
308:
303:
232:
When deciding to create a "film project" article, do not automatically create the title, instead move the filming title name of the article to the "film project" title name per
100:, in certain circumstances where the length and depth of enduring coverage of a future project exceeds the requirements for presumption of notability as set by the
314:
218:
treat an article on an unmade film as if the topic was of an actual film. For example, if you include a cast section it should say "planned cast".
286:
221:
Since we do not treat the article in the same manner as a film article, there can be no use of a film infobox until principal filming has been
107:
This essay is intended to assist editors in determining when it might be acceptable to create a "film project" article, and how to create one.
330:
50:
It contains the advice or opinions of one or more
Knowledge contributors. This page is not an encyclopedia article, nor is it one of
128:
51:
96:
states that a film should generally not have an independent article until actual filming had commenced. However, and per
281:
87:
124:
116:
120:
291:
148:
156:
155:. If so then it could be acceptable as long as it is widely sourced by those significant coverage per
55:
250:
176:
167:. Although it's better to discuss it on the discussion page and ask for a consensus on it first.
65:
123:. The film was taken to AFD with the result of no consensus. Another known AFD came to be when
43:
164:
97:
205:
If the article title is ambiguous, what is required is to disambiguate the title, as the
143:
The most important thing to ask yourself is: does this particular topic meet
Knowledge's
272:
and cautious when making one or otherwise it can possibly either be merged or deleted.
269:
237:
233:
160:
324:
152:
101:
93:
17:
58:. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints.
226:
131:
but was overturned when the film ironically began filming before it was over. See
222:
144:
115:
This debate of whether this can be done started with the film article
317:
A archived debate focusing on the idea of film project articles.ic
309:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/X-Men: First Class (film project)
29:
304:
Knowledge: Articles for deletion/The
Avengers (2012 film)
315:
Knowledge talk:WikiProject Film/Archive 32#Film projects
258:
191:
184:
86:
This page is about the essay. For the WikiProject, see
73:
240:it back to the filming title name when ready.
8:
171:Manual of Style for a "film project" article
311:Where the can of worms phrase come from.
151:such as significant coverage that meets
287:Knowledge:WikiProject Film/Future films
139:When it can and can not be acceptable
7:
244:
56:thoroughly vetted by the community
52:Knowledge's policies or guidelines
25:
129:X-Men: First Class (film project)
33:
119:when it was originally called
1:
331:Knowledge essays about media
347:
282:Knowledge:WikiProject Film
248:
174:
132:
88:Knowledge:WikiProject Film
85:
63:
27:Essay on editing Knowledge
245:Don't open a can of worms
236:. That way you it can be
135:for both of those AFD's.
125:X-Men: First Class (film)
117:The Avengers film project
121:The Avengers (2012 film)
102:general notability guide
292:Category:Upcoming films
127:was originally called
145:notability guidelines
54:, as it has not been
18:Knowledge:FILMPROJECT
210:the title itself.
84:
83:
16:(Redirected from
338:
261:
227:reliable sources
194:
187:
76:
37:
36:
30:
21:
346:
345:
341:
340:
339:
337:
336:
335:
321:
320:
300:
278:
265:
264:
257:
253:
247:
198:
197:
192:MOS:FILMPROJECT
190:
183:
179:
173:
141:
113:
91:
80:
79:
72:
68:
60:
59:
34:
28:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
344:
342:
334:
333:
323:
322:
319:
318:
312:
306:
299:
296:
295:
294:
289:
284:
277:
274:
263:
262:
254:
249:
246:
243:
242:
241:
230:
219:
211:
196:
195:
188:
180:
175:
172:
169:
161:pre-production
157:WP:Crystalball
140:
137:
112:
109:
82:
81:
78:
77:
74:WP:FILMPROJECT
69:
64:
61:
49:
48:
40:
38:
26:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
343:
332:
329:
328:
326:
316:
313:
310:
307:
305:
302:
301:
297:
293:
290:
288:
285:
283:
280:
279:
275:
273:
271:
260:
256:
255:
252:
239:
235:
231:
228:
224:
220:
217:
212:
208:
204:
203:
202:
193:
189:
186:
182:
181:
178:
170:
168:
166:
162:
158:
154:
150:
149:verifiability
146:
138:
136:
134:
130:
126:
122:
118:
110:
108:
105:
103:
99:
95:
89:
75:
71:
70:
67:
62:
57:
53:
47:
45:
39:
32:
31:
19:
266:
215:
206:
199:
142:
114:
106:
92:
41:
207:movie title
42:This is an
223:confirmed
177:Shortcuts
325:Category
276:See also
251:Shortcut
185:WP:MOSFP
165:WP:SPLIT
66:Shortcut
259:WP:Worm
234:WP:MOVE
111:History
153:WP:GNG
133:#Notes
98:policy
94:WP:NFF
298:Notes
238:moved
216:Never
44:essay
270:bold
225:in
327::
229:.
90:.
46:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.