167:
149:
119:
101:
85:
71:
195:
181:
133:
44:
62:
301:
The fact that you weren't forewarned about it last
November is what's troubling. At the very least, if you had a stake in the topic, should you not have realized that once one of the article's in the topic loses its status that the status of the topic would also be brought up? Well, the consensus was
328:
I've done a poor man's two step to see if the basic issues have been addressed, which should be enough to get this up to GA-class for the time being. If I can muster some willpower I might drill into the article and take a closer look at what we have to work with and see if more couldn't be added to
480:
has regained GA-Class status there is no justifiable reason given by the nominator for delisting this featured topic. Accordingly, I am !voting that its status as a featured topic be retained unless the nominator adds an additional commentary for delisting consideration.
33:
283:
without feeling that all that work will be for nothing. Also, it would've been nice to have been forewarned that this was coming rather that to have found out about this via my watchlist.
37:
17:
451:
through GAN, so the topic is now fine as far as article ratings are concerned. The various tags highlighted on the book report still need to be addressed, though.
516:
490:
460:
425:
411:
383:
369:
338:
323:
292:
264:
250:
228:
279:
up for deletion, depending on what happens at the afd's this'll either be resolved there or if consensus is for keep then OMT personnel can work on
198:
136:
510:
398:
356:
346:
The book report is also filled with issues for most of these articles. The topic really needs some work to be up to snuff.
468:
Although
Nergaal raised a good point above, the issue that brought this featured topic here was the sub-standard article
88:
211:, which was demoted from being a featured article last November. So the topic currently fails criterion 3(a).--
166:
148:
118:
100:
84:
70:
388:
The featured topic box has a few links in the top-left corner. Click on "report" and you will be taken to it.
236:
104:
152:
47:
469:
208:
184:
170:
122:
486:
456:
379:
334:
288:
406:
364:
394:
352:
260:
246:
235:
You really need to clarify that. Why does the demotion of another article (USS Kentucky) mean
421:
315:
220:
402:
360:
74:
500:
482:
452:
375:
330:
284:
390:
348:
256:
242:
417:
308:
213:
61:
271:...Yeah, to be fair, I didn't get that part at first either. I've put
207:
This topic passed its retention on
February 6, 2012 for the article
255:
Nevermind, delisted from
Featured Topic, not Featured Article. -
18:
Knowledge (XXG):Featured and good topic removal candidates
302:
to keep both articles, so work should get started on the
8:
374:The 'book report'? What pray tell is that?
306:if you want to retain the topic's status.--
416:Some dead links and citation needed tags.
194:
7:
180:
132:
43:
24:
193:
179:
165:
147:
131:
117:
99:
83:
69:
60:
42:
447:- I made the final push to get
1:
517:16:38, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
491:22:44, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
461:18:49, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
426:16:27, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
412:15:51, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
384:03:15, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
370:14:45, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
533:
339:18:33, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
324:10:14, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
498:Closed, topic kept at FT.
293:00:48, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
265:13:48, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
251:13:40, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
229:06:31, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
237:Iowa class battleships
27:Iowa class battleships
239:must be demoted also?
209:USS Kentucky (BB-66)
512:Operation Big Bear
141:grounding incident
51:-class battleships
524:
513:
507:
410:
368:
322:
319:
312:
227:
224:
217:
197:
196:
183:
182:
169:
151:
135:
134:
121:
103:
93:turret explosion
87:
73:
64:
46:
45:
532:
531:
527:
526:
525:
523:
522:
521:
515:
511:
501:
476:, and now that
389:
347:
317:
310:
307:
222:
215:
212:
205:
204:
203:
161:
113:
65:
57:
56:
53:
40:
29:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
530:
528:
520:
519:
509:
494:
493:
463:
441:
440:
439:
438:
437:
436:
435:
434:
433:
432:
431:
430:
429:
428:
296:
295:
268:
267:
253:
202:
201:
191:
177:
162:
160:
159:
145:
144:
143:
114:
112:
111:
97:
96:
95:
66:
59:
58:
54:
41:
32:
31:
30:
28:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
529:
518:
514:
508:
506:
505:
499:
496:
495:
492:
488:
484:
479:
475:
473:
467:
464:
462:
458:
454:
450:
446:
443:
442:
427:
423:
419:
415:
414:
413:
408:
404:
400:
396:
392:
387:
386:
385:
381:
377:
373:
372:
371:
366:
362:
358:
354:
350:
345:
342:
341:
340:
336:
332:
327:
326:
325:
321:
320:
314:
313:
305:
300:
299:
298:
297:
294:
290:
286:
282:
278:
274:
270:
269:
266:
262:
258:
254:
252:
248:
244:
240:
238:
233:
232:
231:
230:
226:
225:
219:
218:
210:
200:
192:
190:
188:
178:
176:
174:
168:
164:
163:
158:
156:
150:
146:
142:
140:
130:
129:
128:
126:
120:
116:
115:
110:
108:
102:
98:
94:
92:
86:
82:
81:
80:
78:
72:
68:
67:
63:
52:
50:
39:
35:
26:
19:
503:
502:
497:
477:
471:
465:
448:
444:
343:
316:
309:
303:
280:
276:
272:
234:
221:
214:
206:
186:
172:
154:
138:
124:
106:
90:
76:
48:
55:10 articles
107:New Jersey
504:Wizardman
483:TomStar81
453:Parsecboy
376:TomStar81
331:TomStar81
285:TomStar81
155:Wisconsin
478:Kentucky
472:Kentucky
449:Kentucky
399:contribs
391:Headbomb
357:contribs
349:Headbomb
304:Kentucky
281:Kentucky
277:Kentucky
273:Illinois
257:Fnlayson
243:Fnlayson
199:Armament
187:Kentucky
173:Illinois
139:Missouri
125:Missouri
474:(BB-66)
445:Comment
418:Nergaal
403:physics
361:physics
344:Comment
189:(BB-66)
175:(BB-65)
157:(BB-64)
127:(BB-63)
109:(BB-62)
79:(BB-61)
38:discuss
407:books
365:books
16:<
487:Talk
470:USS
466:Keep
457:talk
422:talk
395:talk
380:Talk
353:talk
335:Talk
329:it.
289:Talk
275:and
261:talk
247:talk
185:USS
171:USS
153:USS
137:USS
123:USS
105:USS
91:Iowa
89:USS
77:Iowa
75:USS
49:Iowa
34:edit
489:)
459:)
424:)
405:/
401:/
397:/
382:)
363:/
359:/
355:/
337:)
291:)
263:)
249:)
36:|
485:(
455:(
420:(
409:}
393:{
378:(
367:}
351:{
333:(
318:八
311:十
287:(
259:(
245:(
241:-
223:八
216:十
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
