Knowledge

:Featured article candidates/1804 dollar/archive1 - Knowledge

Source 📝

105:(as it was described in the title of the landmark work by Eric P. Newman and Kenneth Bressett). Also famously lauded as the "king of American coins," the 1804 dollar is among the most famous and controversial coins in American history. Although they were dated 1804, they were actually first struck some thirty years after that date. Although it was widely believed at one time that the coins were struck in 1804, numismatists began questioning that by the late nineteenth century. In truth, they were initially created in 1834 for inclusion in diplomatic gift sets for the Sultan of Muscat and Oman and the King of Siam at the behest of a diplomat named Edmund Roberts. Two additional sets were created for officials in Cochinchina and Japan (twenty years before Matthew Perry's forced entry into that nation), but they remained ungifted due to Roberts' death in Macau. Later, clandestine restrikes were created to satisfy collector demand, and those too are very valuable today. In 1999, one example (probably the one presented to the Sultan) sold for over $ 4 million at auction, which was the highest price ever paid for any coin at the time. In total, fifteen specimens are known today. The contributions of 260:"Though dated 1804, none were struck in that year; all were minted in the 1830s or later. They were first struck for use in special proof coin sets used as diplomatic gifts during Edmund Roberts's trips to Siam and Muscat. Some silver dollars were struck " -rep of struck x 3 Years of production also the same problem " 1804 dollars were struck in 1804 was not widely accepted by numismatists until the early twentieth century. Before such time, the actual year in which they were struck remained contentious among numismatists. Early on, collectors assumed that the 1804 dollars were struck " -can you find a way to reword one or two? 113:'s assistance was also vital, both as a set of skilled eyes to look over the article and for his help in supplying sources. I believe the article meets all FA criteria, and I thank you in advance for reading, and for any comments or suggestions you might be willing to offer.- 529:– As a non-numismatist I have resisted the natural temptation to assume that the Wehwalt seal of approval says all that needs to be said, and have scrutinised the article as objectively as I can. It meets all the FA criteria, in my view. A fine piece of work – full marks! 414:
Unfortunately, I don't have anything else to add there. I've seen fake 1804 dollar hailing from the Orient myself, but there's not a lot of good information available to me about the recent fakes. They can sometimes be had at various markets, and will often stick to a
360:
I'm very glad that you noticed that. It definitely should not have been written with an ampersand, so I've corrected that. What a hideous mistake! I always judiciously correct that in other articles, but it managed to sneak into
237:: Thanks for SR! I fixed the blockquotes, and I'm very glad you alerted me to that, because I had forgotten that they shouldn't use quotation marks. I'll also remove them from my other articles. The sources are also fixed now.- 407:"More modern replicas were commonly offered as original at low prices to American soldiers on rest and recuperation leave in Thailand during the Vietnam War.[" -interesting, anything to elaborate on here? 160:
If this is your own graphic creation, it is a derivative work of the edge of the original coin. The copyright tag for that, no doubt the US money one should probably be included.
109:
are hard to overstate, both for this article and for coins in general, as most of the images in this article as well as some of the formatting are due to his hard work.
300:"was passed down from the King of Siam " -which particular king was this? Also Siam should probably be linked if you're going to link Macau and the others, 40: 353:"Newman & Bressett " -why are these historians referred to as if they're a coin company or something? I think it should be written in as "and". 603: 30: 17: 614: 163: 497:
Thanks, that's all from me. Meets all of the FA criteria, most interesting learning about its Thai connections. Good luck!♦
267:
That's a good catch. I've reworded it to cut through that redundancy a bit. Do you think the current wording is acceptable?-
633: 592: 577: 559: 544: 520: 505: 488: 469: 453: 424: 395: 370: 341: 316: 289: 276: 246: 229: 200: 178: 139: 122: 93: 65: 332:
Hmm, I see what you mean there. The quote was by Patterson, but it's not really necessary, so I removed and paraphrased.-
461:
All good, interesting article. The sourcing is as a sound as a pound if you'll pardon the pun :-) Await your response.♦
440:
I think that's a good idea. I've added a description of the design to the body of the article. They utilized the
157: 130:
I did some tweaking of the article. It is comprehensive, thorough, and well-written. And well-illustrated :) --
404:"was sold at auction for $ 4,140,000." -again it would be useful to know if this was at Sotherby's or whatever.. 379:
Sale prices -it would be good if you could be more specific with some of the auctions and find where they were.
433:
Should there be a more detailed description of the coins in the prose? I'd have expected a deeper description.
151: 225: 550:
Many thanks, Tim, for your support and kind words. I only wish that I had gotten to yours in time!-
537: 386:
I added the auction galleries, but I don't know the precise locations of the sales in most cases.-
629: 441: 191:
Thanks for the support and image review! I've added all of the appropriate licensing templates.-
573: 174: 135: 607: 498: 476: 462: 307:
I added the King's name, but I already have Siam linked in the first paragraph of the lede.-
282: 61: 588: 555: 516: 484: 449: 420: 391: 366: 337: 312: 272: 242: 234: 221: 196: 118: 89: 606:
has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see
532: 479:! I've implemented all of your suggestions, and I've also added some responses above.- 625: 444:
design, but people who aren't numismatists would probably not be familiar with that.-
53: 569: 325:"specimens of pattern pieces of coin, and rare types" -why the quote, and by whom? 170: 131: 110: 106: 621: 166:
should probably have a money copyright tag in addition to what it has, as well.
75: 57: 584: 551: 512: 480: 445: 416: 387: 362: 333: 308: 268: 238: 192: 114: 85: 568:. The page meets the FA criteria, it is well-written and well-illustrated. -- 169:
Aside from those, all images are appropriately licensed. Great work!--
39:
Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in
511:
Thanks, Dr. B! I appreciate your thoughtful review and support.-
154:
requires a US copyright tag in addition to what it has.
68: 475:Thanks very much for adding your two cents worth, 220:Be consistent in whether books include locations. 641:The above discussion is preserved as an archive. 43:. No further edits should be made to this page. 647:No further edits should be made to this page. 620:template in place on the talk page until the 29:The following is an archived discussion of a 8: 41:Knowledge talk:Featured article candidates 217:Blockquotes shouldn't include quote marks 18:Knowledge:Featured article candidates 7: 24: 164:File:1804 dollar comparison.jpg 1: 615:featured article candidates 31:featured article nomination 664: 634:02:28, 26 March 2015 (UTC) 593:22:48, 20 March 2015 (UTC) 578:22:14, 20 March 2015 (UTC) 560:02:08, 13 March 2015 (UTC) 545:01:22, 13 March 2015 (UTC) 521:02:08, 13 March 2015 (UTC) 506:19:00, 12 March 2015 (UTC) 489:18:56, 12 March 2015 (UTC) 470:14:17, 12 March 2015 (UTC) 454:18:56, 12 March 2015 (UTC) 425:18:56, 12 March 2015 (UTC) 396:18:56, 12 March 2015 (UTC) 371:18:56, 12 March 2015 (UTC) 342:18:56, 12 March 2015 (UTC) 317:18:56, 12 March 2015 (UTC) 290:19:00, 12 March 2015 (UTC) 277:18:56, 12 March 2015 (UTC) 101:This article is about the 66:02:28, 26 March 2015 (UTC) 247:04:17, 7 March 2015 (UTC) 230:03:38, 7 March 2015 (UTC) 201:15:09, 2 March 2015 (UTC) 179:09:36, 2 March 2015 (UTC) 158:File:1804 dollar edge.jpg 140:09:25, 2 March 2015 (UTC) 123:02:29, 2 March 2015 (UTC) 94:02:29, 2 March 2015 (UTC) 644:Please do not modify it. 36:Please do not modify it. 255:Comments by Dr. Blofeld 583:Many thanks, Carioca!- 213:- spotchecks not done 152:File:King Nangklao.jpg 350:William T.R. -no gap? 103:Fantastic 1804 Dollar 97: 655: 646: 619: 613: 610:, and leave the 542: 540: 535: 503: 467: 287: 82: 48:The article was 38: 663: 662: 658: 657: 656: 654: 653: 652: 651: 642: 617: 611: 538: 533: 531: 499: 463: 283: 257: 79: 34: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 661: 659: 650: 649: 637: 636: 624:goes through. 596: 595: 563: 562: 524: 523: 492: 491: 459: 458: 457: 456: 435: 434: 430: 429: 428: 427: 409: 408: 405: 401: 400: 399: 398: 381: 380: 376: 375: 374: 373: 355: 354: 351: 347: 346: 345: 344: 327: 326: 322: 321: 320: 319: 302: 301: 297: 296: 295: 294: 293: 292: 262: 261: 256: 253: 252: 251: 250: 249: 218: 208: 207: 206: 205: 204: 203: 184: 183: 182: 181: 161: 155: 99: 98: 84:Nominator(s): 78: 73: 72: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 660: 648: 645: 639: 638: 635: 631: 627: 623: 616: 609: 605: 601: 598: 597: 594: 590: 586: 582: 581: 580: 579: 575: 571: 567: 561: 557: 553: 549: 548: 547: 546: 543: 541: 536: 528: 522: 518: 514: 510: 509: 508: 507: 504: 502: 496: 490: 486: 482: 478: 474: 473: 472: 471: 468: 466: 455: 451: 447: 443: 439: 438: 437: 436: 432: 431: 426: 422: 418: 413: 412: 411: 410: 406: 403: 402: 397: 393: 389: 385: 384: 383: 382: 378: 377: 372: 368: 364: 359: 358: 357: 356: 352: 349: 348: 343: 339: 335: 331: 330: 329: 328: 324: 323: 318: 314: 310: 306: 305: 304: 303: 299: 298: 291: 288: 286: 280: 279: 278: 274: 270: 266: 265: 264: 263: 259: 258: 254: 248: 244: 240: 236: 233: 232: 231: 227: 223: 219: 216: 215: 214: 212: 211:Source review 202: 198: 194: 190: 189: 188: 187: 186: 185: 180: 176: 172: 168: 167: 165: 162: 159: 156: 153: 150: 149: 148: 146: 142: 141: 137: 133: 129: 125: 124: 120: 116: 112: 108: 104: 96: 95: 91: 87: 81: 80: 77: 74: 71: 69: 67: 63: 59: 55: 51: 44: 42: 37: 32: 27: 26: 19: 643: 640: 600:Closing note 599: 565: 564: 530: 526: 525: 500: 494: 493: 464: 460: 284: 281:Yes, fine.♦ 210: 209: 145:Image review 144: 143: 127: 126: 102: 100: 83: 49: 47: 35: 28: 501:Dr. Blofeld 477:Dr. Blofeld 465:Dr. Blofeld 442:Draped Bust 285:Dr. Blofeld 76:1804 dollar 235:Nikkimaria 222:Nikkimaria 608:WP:FAC/ar 604:candidate 534:Tim riley 626:Ian Rose 602:: This 415:magnet.- 54:Ian Rose 50:promoted 570:Carioca 566:Support 527:Support 495:Support 171:Wehwalt 132:Wehwalt 128:Support 111:Wehwalt 107:Godot13 361:mine!- 58:FACBot 585:RHM22 552:RHM22 513:RHM22 481:RHM22 446:RHM22 417:RHM22 388:RHM22 363:RHM22 334:RHM22 309:RHM22 269:RHM22 239:RHM22 193:RHM22 115:RHM22 86:RHM22 16:< 630:talk 589:talk 574:talk 556:talk 539:talk 517:talk 485:talk 450:talk 421:talk 392:talk 367:talk 338:talk 313:talk 273:talk 243:talk 226:talk 197:talk 175:talk 136:talk 119:talk 90:talk 62:talk 56:via 622:bot 52:by 632:) 618:}} 612:{{ 591:) 576:) 558:) 519:) 487:) 452:) 423:) 394:) 369:) 340:) 315:) 275:) 245:) 228:) 199:) 177:) 147:: 138:) 121:) 92:) 70:. 64:) 33:. 628:( 587:( 572:( 554:( 515:( 483:( 448:( 419:( 390:( 365:( 336:( 311:( 271:( 241:( 224:( 195:( 173:( 134:( 117:( 88:( 60:(

Index

Knowledge:Featured article candidates
featured article nomination
Knowledge talk:Featured article candidates
Ian Rose
FACBot
talk
02:28, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

1804 dollar
RHM22
talk
02:29, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
Godot13
Wehwalt
RHM22
talk
02:29, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
Wehwalt
talk
09:25, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
File:King Nangklao.jpg
File:1804 dollar edge.jpg
File:1804 dollar comparison.jpg
Wehwalt
talk
09:36, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
RHM22
talk
15:09, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
Nikkimaria

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.