2319:: the "free" images check out fine. Eric M. Ryan's photos are licensed with the OTRS, and for the exterior stadium shot, Marc Averette is associated with his user name here. The "non-free" logo is the sticking point. I would prefer a defining moment of the match to be the identifying picture&mdashlthe winning touchdown, a terrifying injury, a brilliant catch, a picture that is heavily reported and touted in the media. The trademarked, copyrighted logo as an identifying picture is rather overused, leading to arguments and contentions till there was an
1272:- This article is a perfect example of how even a great formula can be further refined. Although it's been less than two months since the game, I think it's the best article in JK's series so far, with the lone exception of that one table. My original theory was that it was due to its left placement (left-sided photos below level 3 section headers cause accessibility problems), but moving it to the right didn't help at all. Despite that, I think the rest of the article is FA-worthy, so I won't withhold support. It does concern me somewhat, though.
1870:"The official reported attendance was 53,927, but this number came from the number of tickets sold, and the actual attendance in the stadium—measured by admittance turnstiles—was 27,360, the lowest ever recorded for an ACC football championship game." For the sake of flow, I think that this should be split into two sentences.
978:
Thanks for the review. I typically throw the college football link in the lede as a guide for non-American readers who might stumble across the article. Sure, anyone who doesn't know what college football is isn't likely to be searching for an individual game, but I'd rather throw it in there just in
522:
If you can find a source, I think it merits inclusion. I looked briefly, but couldn't find one. I think it might be important because it was a direct-effect of the game's results: If BC had won, they would have gone to the first-tier ACC game automatically. Since they lost they fell to the (tied for)
344:"...gave the Eagles a 2–1 conference record, and they appeared to be destined for an easy bid to the ACC championship game." With only three games completed (and only two wins), why did it appear like an easy bid to the ACCCG? They still had five games remaining, were they all against heavy underdogs?
107:
in particular. I've used the link-checker and disambiguation-page tools to check for problems, and these have been fixed. The citations are uniformly formatted, and the prose is as clear as I can make it without more outside input. I look forward to seeing what issues and problems you can find, and I
2022:
Well, the Music City Bowl has a smaller payout and reaches a smaller television audience than any of the alternative destinations Boston
College could have been selected by. In addition, it has a shorter history than the alternatives and is seen generally as a less prestigious destination for all of
1117:
Fourth quarter: "The fumble was again recovered by Boston
College linebacker Heinzerlich and Boston College's offense returned to the field." Did we mention when this guy previously recovered a fumble? I don't even see his first name anywhere. There is a "Herzlich" in the Eagles' defense; is there a
647:
I wouldn't rely on bleacherreport to justify any facts, but in this case, the reference is just being used to back up the assertion that people were calling the regular season "crazy". If you don't like that cite, another source is citing the same thing, but from a media (instead of fan) viewpoint.
361:
According to the ACC tiebreaker rules, "If two or more teams are tied with the highest percentage of wins, they shall be declared division co-champions." Thus, BC/FSU and VT/GT were division co-champions. The tie-breaker rules are simply to decide who appears in the ACCCG to represent each division
425:
In the Boston
College offense para: As of the 2008 season, there are 120 Division I FBS teams, not 119. This is still misquoted in some media outlets (as I imagine is the case in the print news article cited), but Western Kentucky was promoted starting in 2008, bringing the total to 120. (see here
401:
There's a small degree of inconsistency in the way teams are referred. You use the full "Georgia Tech Yellow
Jackets" and "North Carolina Tar Heels", but shortened school form "Notre Dame" and "Kent State", and then the full school name "East Carolina University." I would recommend using the short
308:
In the predictions for the ACCCG, you mention
Clemson losing to "eventual No. 1 Alabama." People at the time didn't think much of Alabama, though, and as a result thought Clemson was a lot worse than they really. That may merit a mention (if you or I can find an adequate citation), as losing to an
503:
In the post-game effects: Can you expand upon the bowl game selections. Obviously, VT got an automatic berth in the BCS game. But, BC fell to the 5th-pick Music City Bowl despite being the ACC runners-up. In my opinion, (of course we'll need to find a citation) this is due to a perception of BC's
468:
I didn't think it was exceptionally good or exceptionally bad ... IMHO, that's something that belongs in the main
Virginia Tech football section rather than this subsection because it's something that defines the team, rather than the season of which this game was a part. Now, if you think it's
402:
form of the school name in initial references and then the short school form alternating with the nickname where stylistic variation is needed (like use in the same sentence, for example). But since its just stylistic, I think any form you go with would be acceptable as long as its consistent.
290:
In the paragraph addressing the games history, you refer to teams which make their first appearance as "new" teams. To me, so soon after describing three teams joining the conference (VT, Miami, and BC), it seems to imply that those were teams actually new to the conference. Wake Forest was a
1126:
Double right. I have no idea where I got "Heinzerlich" from, but
Herzlich did have a fumble recovery at the beginning of the fourth quarter. Doesn't look as if I put his name in for that one, so I'll take out the "again". With it in there, it makes it sound as if he recovered the same fumble
2151:
The idea was to use it as a transition sentence between that section and the section before it. The debates about the site of the game began before
Virginia Tech won the 2007 game, an event described in the previous section. The events overlap chronologically, if not in
548:: "With the program lacking a large group of traveling fans, this season’s squad - again the ACC runner-up - slipped to the Music City Bowl, which had the fifth selection in the ACC. The bowl was obliged to choose the title game’s loser if it had not yet been selected."
195:
I'm not sure ... I've always been under the impression that bowl games were the start of the postseason in college football. I definitely can see it the other way, though. If you think it should be the other way around, I'd be happy to change it. I can go either way, I
575:
The BC coaching changes section: I'm not opposed to its inclusion, but I think it needs to be made explicit why this was related to the ACCCG. Could it be because
Jagodzinski surprised everyone with his team's performance in the season, which resulted in the NFL
1709:
I'm trying to get that exception changed ... I really, really, really, really hate that exception to the general rule that you spell out numbers nine and under and use numerals for 10 and over. I don't know why I hate it so much -- it's irrational, but I just
1339:
I've tucked it in that section, but it doesn't look quite as nice any more, since it now juts into the Boston
College section and has to be separated with a wide spread of white space. It may look a little better with a different screen resolution, though.
88:
669:
Current ref 60 (Rudie, Preston...) has a last access date and from the publisher it appears to be a website, but no link. It go missing? Also, what makes this a reliable source? (I'll go ahead and ask before I see the link, just based off the name of the
485:
In the statistical recap, is "profligate" the right term? Would prolific be more appropriate? If not, I think you should explain why it was reckless. Was it because of the two interceptions? Lack of down conversions? Easier reads by the opposing
720:- The JKBrooks series of bowl game articles has become something that I always look forward to seeing at FAC. As the pages continue to become more refined, I'm struggling to find issues. There are some below, but my support isn't that far away.
1078:"Rather than run a play, Boston College elected to run out the clock with Virginia Tech leading, 14-7." They actually did run a play, for a one-yard loss. I'm guessing they just downed the ball, but saying they didn't run a play isn't accurate.
446:
WKU has been "in transition" since 2007 and won't be eligible for bowls until next season when they join the Sun Belt. But I'm pretty sure they are considered FBS. I've seen them usually lumped in with the other FBS independents (like here at
2144:- I'm having trouble following the chronology, and the significance of the first part of the sentence. Did this process take place before the 2007 Championship Game, or is there some event at which a team is declared champion?
1382:"The game was sponsored by Dr. Pepper and was the final regular-season contest of the " The "was ... was" repetition is distracting. Maybe: "The game, sponsored by Dr. Pepper, was the final regular-season contest of the..."
460:
Does "Beamer Ball" deserve a mention in the team comparison section? Most people agree that compiling non-offensive scores is a major aspect of Beamer's strategy. How did VT do on special teams and defensive scoring this
98:
articles I've submitted to FAC. I feel it is well-written, understandable, adequately cited, and uses appropriate images with necessary licenses. I've incorporated suggestions given in previous FACs of similar articles,
615:: An email was sent to the image permissions account last month, but it looks as if no admin added the correct OTRS. The ticket number is 2008120910013531, and if someone could help resolve this, I'd appreciate it.
1248:
I'm all done now, though I'm sure Dabomb can find more things to fix in his concurrent review. Left a note on the template above as well. It looks great overall, and I'll be ready to support when these are done.
319:
the "eventual No. 1". Trying to clarify what people thought at the time would've taken too much prose to be worthwhile, and leaving it in there makes the loss sound better than it was, so it's easier to remove
221:
I think the term "extreme parity" might be redundant. Parity seems to me to mean equality, so gradations of it seem a bit contradictory. Might I suggest use of "extremely close," "closely contested," or simply
1721:. I take just the opposite view for largely the same reason :) However, if (by some miracle) you can get that guideline to be changed by the time this nomination finishes, feel free to disregard this comment.
2320:
187:
Are championship games considered part of the regular season? I would be led to believe they are not, as the results do not affect the teams' conference records... I am unsure either way and may be mistaken,
941:
Attendance concerns: "To mitigate the problems seen in Jacksonville the year nrgotr". I see many fairly exotic words while reviewing, but the last word here is probably the most exotic I've seen so far. :-)
327:
In the BC paragraph: "raced to a 9–7 halftime lead." Seems overly emotional use of the verb, and also inappropriate as I don't think nine points in a half could be considered as racing to score repeatedly.
1533:"In the annual preseason poll of media covering the ACC" A bit vague; did the poll cover the ACC or was it the media that covered the ACC. The noun + -ing construction ("media covering") is a bit awkward.
291:
founding member and Georgia Tech joined in the 70s, so that seems a little misleading. Can you change it somehow to indicate that these were teams making their "first appearance" rather than "new teams"?
542:(from last year, but gives historical perspective): "...Boston College this week, a historically shoddy track record of fan travel to bowl games -- a major consideration for selection committees..."
583:
I've been looking for a citation that explains exactly that. ... Haven't had any luck, though. I'll keep working at it, and will keep adding to the post-game effects section as events develop. The
526:
I think a one- or two-sentence mention is warranted, as this happened as a direct result of this game. So I think it is one of the more important "post-game effects." These references might help:
469:
necessary to understand the game, I can add something in there. My initial thought with these games is to leave it out because it's something that defines the team, rather than a season or game.
273:"The ACC Championship Game matches up the winner of the Coastal and Atlantic Divisions..." – Shouldn't this be "winners"? Or "winner of the Coastal Division and Atlantic Division"? Not sure...
536:: "If the ACC FCG runner-up is available, and has won a minimum of eight games, then Music City Bowl must select that team, unless that team agrees to being selected by another bowl."
515:
article rather than this one. Do you think it's necessary to talk about it? I do agree that more should be written about the bowl games, and have added results and other information.
504:
fanbase traveling poorly. There is actually an NCAA rule called the "Boston College rule" or something to that effect, which ensures that teams don't fall too far in bowl selection.
1975:"Taylor then threw an incomplete pass, then the Hokies were penalized 10 yards for holding, pushing them back to the 31-yard line." "then ... then". They are really not necessary.
955:
That will do for now, but I'll be back in the next day or two for more. Before I go, why is there a Commons link for college football? That seems to be too general for the topic.
256:
In the fourth paragraph of the lead you use "Tech quarterback Tyrod Taylor" twice, I think the part saying he was MVP you could simply use "Taylor" or "Virginia Tech's Taylor."
2071:
No comments on the actual match part of the article due to my inability to fathom the ins and outs of American football matches, but some comments on the preceding parts:
1815:
I under stand Strikehold's view, and it does seem a bit unnecessary (considering that this is an American subject), but all the same, playing on the safe side doesn't hurt.
2343:#1 and #8. The solution is simple, write a stronger rationale that can explain why this logo is instrumental to the 2008 ACC Championship or remove it from the article.
2101:- from looking at their respective articles, the teams both formed in 1892, so "new to the Championship game" must be the intended meaning, but it is ambiguous as written.
1036:
Second quarter: "Facing third down and needing 20 yards for a first down". It was a third-and-19, according to the reference. I could tell because the math doesn't add up.
409:
In the places I used the long form of the name, it's because I referred to the teams as the "Yellow Jackets" or "Tar Heels" later in the sentence or in the next sentence.
384:
A stylistic gripe, but you use "lightly regarded" three times by my count. I would favor cutting its use to once and instead using a more common term like "underdog."
2283:
The images need to be linked from Wikimedia Commons instead of Knowledge (XXG), and I have no idea how to do that, since they both have the same image name on each.
922:
Pre-game buildup: "with various betting organizations either favoring Boston College by a single point or having no spread at all." Noun-plus-ing for the third time.
2142:
Before Virginia Tech was declared the 2007 ACC football champion, cities other than Jacksonville (site of the 2007 ACC Championship Game) presented their plans...
146:
I have a few comments, mostly related to minor stylistic improvements or minor requests for clarification. Once these are addressed, I think it will meet FAC 1–4.
40:
1193:
Boston College coaching changes: "to interview for the vacant head coaching position at the National Football League's New York Jets." Change "at" to "of"?
849:
Boston College: "Against the Georgia Tech". Little glitch there. And find a better word to start a sentence than "But", which begins the next sentence.
363:
1135:
Statistical summary: Can the one-sentence paragraph at the end be moved into the first paragraph of the section? It looks a little lonely down there.
868:
Check the capitalization of "ACC championship game" a couple times in the section. Please do the same for division and Division, which I see later.
362:("...tie-breaker procedure will be used to determine that divisions’ representative to the championship game."). This was pointed out to me on the
30:
17:
2323:
that had no concensus. Ignoring that, the logo if used as an identifying image should convince us of its purpose as that, and not because it is "
1401:
There needs to be a key and accompanying symbols for the standings table. What do the shadings for Virginia Tech and Boston College represent?
239:"Never relinquished the lead or allowed a tie." I think "never relinquished the lead" is sufficient as allowing a tie would relinquish a lead.
144:(all issues have been addressed) – Excellent article, very in-depth and well-cited throughout. Nicely laid out and makes good use of images.
2078:- maybe its my lack of familiarity with US sports vernacular, but "matches" seems imprecise. Would "is contested between" be an improvement?
1155:
Postgame effects: The two monetary figures need non-breaking spaces, like this (hit edit button to see where to put code): $ 17.5Â million.
1201:
That's: "the vacant head coaching position at the... New York Jets." I think either "at" or "of" work there. "With" would work as well.
1797:
Not in the US, which it is from context. ABC is common knowledge in the US usage and, in my opinion, doesn't really warrant expansion.
1588:
Beat me to it. Non-essential elements (can be removed without changing the meaning of the phrase) should be cordoned off by commas.
2429:
2404:
2388:
2372:
2352:
2310:
2292:
2278:
2261:
2243:
2223:
2202:
2175:
2060:
2042:
1860:
1843:
1824:
1806:
1748:
1730:
1615:
1597:
1486:
1468:
1450:
1428:
1349:
1330:
1303:
1287:
1264:
1210:
988:
970:
814:
790:
772:
709:
695:
659:
624:
603:
564:
157:
135:
117:
2014:"The pick by the Music City Bowl represented a drop in prestige for Boston College." Not sure where you got this information from.
1606:
Hm, I've seen both styles in formal prose. Anyway, you are the sports editor, and you are probably right. Disregard that comment.
1097:
Third quarter: "and the Boston College Eagles were forced to punt after going three and out." Is the full team name really needed?
757:
It's cutting the "(Pregame) ACC Standings" header so I can't see the bottom. It's on the top of the table, which is really odd.
1294:
Is anyone else having this problem? I haven't been able to reproduce it, and I'd hate to have someone else be affected by it.
1374:
1688:
I think I mentioned in one of your previous FACs about comparable quantities being written out the same, a couple examples:
1459:
I've tried to outflank some of the problems by removing the shading and using bolded text instead. Does that work for you?
998:
First quarter (long gap between problems!): "where the Hokies' offense began the first play of the game." Somewhat awkward.
2085:
I'm not sure ... that seems a little verbose. Does the confusion stem from the British English term of a "football match"?
2090:
Probably just a Br. Eng / Am. Eng thing. To me "match" in a sporting context is a synonym for "game", rather than "pair".
539:
1017:"Virginia Tech called a timeout in order to formulate its next offensive play." Some wordiness to consider removing.
309:
eventual late-season No. 1 and SEC championship team shouldn't in itself upset predictions for a spot in the ACCCG.
104:
64:
725:
Noun-plus-ing in the lead: "with both teams punting after their opening possessions failed to gain a first down."
2379:
The rationale is sufficient for identification, the image issue as stated above for this article is resolved.
203:
Also think the fact that this was a re-match of the previous year's ACCCG merits mention somewhere in the lead.
2157:
Then it would be simpler to start the sentence with something like "Before the 2007 ACC Championship game..."
1718:
2266:
743:
The ACC standings chart, while a great original idea, looks weird for me. The header is cut in half for me.
674:
Link added. It's a TV news channel in Tampa Bay, the site of the game. I just forgot to add the link to it.
2257:
1326:
1318:
I think the table above "Team selection" creates an accessibility problem (should be within the section).
169:, I believe the boldfaced title should be un-linked. Appearances of the terms thereafter should be linked.
427:
2335:", because it tells the reader nothing about the two sides that took part or the outcome of the match. "
2400:
2368:
2306:
2288:
2239:
2219:
2171:
2056:
1856:
1802:
1783:"United States on ABC" Spell out ABC on its first appearance (there are other TV stations called ABC)
1744:
1593:
1464:
1345:
1299:
1281:
1258:
1206:
984:
964:
808:
786:
766:
705:
620:
599:
560:
512:
153:
131:
113:
78:
1549:
One problem I am noticing is the usage of unnecessary commas before the introduction of game scores:
1419:
I don't know if you have done this already, but change it on the previous ACC championsip articles.
2384:
2348:
2198:
1438:
594:
Thanks for the great review. Let me know what you decide for the areas we've got questions about.
2274:
2038:
1839:
1820:
1726:
1611:
1482:
1446:
1424:
1368:
692:
656:
545:
887:
Virginia Tech: The Kansas Jayhawks link goes to the 2008 team; shouldn't it go to the 2007 team?
533:
1700:"in tackles with 98—fifth among all Division I players—and interceptions, with six" "98"--: -->
2425:
2250:
2214:. Thank you very much for taking the time to go through the article. It's really appreciated.
1319:
100:
2340:
830:
Team selection: Another noun-plus-ing: "with the two teams meeting in the championship game."
166:
1631:"During the last two games of the regular season, however, the Hokies managed two victories"
95:
2396:
2364:
2302:
2284:
2235:
2215:
2167:
2052:
1852:
1798:
1740:
1589:
1460:
1341:
1295:
1274:
1251:
1202:
980:
957:
801:
782:
759:
701:
616:
595:
556:
149:
127:
109:
74:
91:
2112:. Changed it to refer to a championship-game veteran and one new to a championship game.
2380:
2344:
2301:
It appears as if someone has updated the images. Many thank yous to whomever did that!
2194:
1739:
I knuckled down and changed them. I don't have to like it ... I just have to do it. ;)
584:
687:(Ooops, got you confused with the newcomer who brought a bowl game to FAC! (blushes))
2270:
2034:
1835:
1816:
1722:
1607:
1478:
1442:
1437:"relevant" is a bit vague. Also, you need add symbols to accompany the shadings (per
1420:
1364:
688:
652:
1047:. Dang, nice catch! I may have gotten that incorrect measurement from the game tape.
2421:
1143:
Yeah. I had hoped to create a paragraph about records set, but decided against it.
53:
1994:"Jeff Jagodzinski ordered kicker Jeff Aponavicius into the game" "ordered"--: -->
914:
It's a part of greater Boston, at least according to the article on the subject.
2269:– There is no info on who the holder of the copyright holder is (attribution).
1928:"where the Boston College offense had its first play of the game" "had"--: -->
587:, in particular, will probably develop into a subsection when it takes place.
683:
Otherwise, sources look okay, links checked out with the link checker tool.
1909:"Despite that initial success," I wouldn't call a four-yard pass "success".
1764:"permitting just 275 yards per game" Let the rankings speak for themselves.
416:
Okay. As long as you have applied a consistent system to it, I'm satisfied.
448:
439:. I didn't think Western Kentucky was a full FBS member until next season.
108:
look forward to fixing them. Thanks for your time, and have a great day!
2192:- the ref does not say anything about Kent State being lightly regarded.
2190:
The Eagles opened the season by traveling to lightly regarded Kent State
1573:
The scores are optional clauses, so they need to be set off by commas.
1377:) Excellent article, I notice that your prose has improved a lot too!
1231:
Reference 41 needs a publisher. I recommend the method used in ref 12.
2339:" can be represented by text. As it is, the current rationale fails
1696:"33 tackles (11 for loss) and a team-high seven sacks" "seven"--: -->
555:
Gotcha. Thanks for the links and the suggestion. They've been added.
39:
Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in
2337:
Title sponsor, television broadcaster, and the name of the event
2234:. Another well written and comprehensive article by JKBrooks85.
2123:- the reference makes no mention of the game being hard-fought.
2363:. I have updated the non-free criteria as best as I know how.
641:
2121:
A hard-fought game resulted in a 30–16 Virginia Tech victory
1569:"beating Central Florida, 34–7, Audit throughout for these."
949:
Heh. That'll teach me to keep my hands on the home row!
57:
2333:
reader unwilling to delve into the text of the article
1956:
don't like the repetition of "first". Maybe "initial"?
2099:
one new team and one old team featured in the contest
89:
Atlantic Coast Conference football championship games
2420:- meets FA criteria, well written and referenced.
148:The article meets FA criteria 1–4, in my opinion.
2437:The above discussion is preserved as an archive.
2249:Still waiting for image review on this article.
87:2008 ACC Championship Game is a component of the
2076:The ACC Championship Game matches the winners of
1948:"but the Hokies earned the first first down " I
41:Knowledge (XXG) talk:Featured article candidates
2329:provides vital information with a simple glance
2031:"also announced he was leaving the team"--: -->
906:Is Chestnut Hill part of Boston? Just checking.
43:. No further edits should be made to this page.
2443:No further edits should be made to this page.
511:My thought was that problem should be in the
29:The following is an archived discussion of a
8:
2032:also announced that he was leaving the team
1889:"ensuring the Eagles would receive "--: -->
1834:Can't wait to return for the game summary!
1477:You still need to explain the bolded text.
1412:. I swear, this table keeps getting uglier.
1089:. Changed it to "rather than try to score".
637:What makes the following reliable sources?
373:Interesting! I didn't know that. It's been
18:Knowledge (XXG):Featured article candidates
799:Yes, at least for me. That's a weird one.
394:one usage with underdog and wikilinked it.
1174:Perhaps link the Southeastern Conference?
1055:"Taylor scrambled on third down, gaining
1541:I added "by". Let me know if that helps.
354:"easy". That's an opinion word, anyway.
2051:Changes have been made. Thanks again!
1890:ensuring that the Eagles would receive
94:and another in a continuing series of
7:
24:
1559:"whom the Eagles defeated, 21–0."
1554:"which Virginia Tech won, 30–16."
1650:"category outside of the top 25"
534:2008 ACC bowl selection process
1059:eight yards and a first down."
1:
2430:23:37, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
2405:07:59, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
2389:05:32, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
2373:04:28, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
2353:03:06, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
1669:"which gained just 319 yards"
2311:02:16, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
2293:21:13, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
2279:21:00, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
2262:20:18, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
2244:20:16, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
2224:11:17, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
2203:00:04, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
2176:01:14, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
2061:11:17, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
2043:23:07, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
1861:00:36, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
1844:23:05, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
1825:00:51, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
1807:00:44, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
1749:12:06, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
1731:00:51, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
1701:ninety-eight or "six"--: -->
1616:00:51, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
1598:00:44, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
1514:before (multiple occurences)
1487:02:24, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
1469:01:08, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
1451:23:13, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
1429:00:51, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
1350:09:28, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
1331:00:14, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
1304:01:08, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
1288:21:23, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
1265:23:37, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
1211:00:09, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
989:10:52, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
971:03:37, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
815:21:23, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
791:12:06, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
773:23:37, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
710:02:29, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
696:02:20, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
660:02:38, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
625:00:56, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
604:00:53, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
565:23:16, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
158:15:22, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
136:15:22, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
118:05:29, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
1564:"eventually losing, 19–16,"
31:featured article nomination
2460:
781:Is it still doing it now?
642:http://bleacherreport.com/
126:– All comments addressed.
105:2007 ACC Championship Game
65:2008 ACC Championship Game
2440:Please do not modify it.
1717:Yep, I saw your post on
750:Cut in half in what way?
56:04:11, 19 February 2009
36:Please do not modify it.
1851:Looking forward to it!
364:ACC standings talk page
2327:". Neither would it "
2325:aesthetically pleasing
700:Thanks for the check!
651:I can live with that.
176:I think you're right.
2267:File:ACCChampgame.png
513:2008 Music City Bowl
685:And welcome to FAC!
476:That works for me.
1513:"Prior to"--: -->
101:2003 Insight Bowl
83:
2451:
2442:
2254:
1495:Removed bolding.
1323:
1284:
1277:
1261:
1254:
967:
960:
811:
804:
769:
762:
546:Yahoo/Rivals.com
523:fifth-pick game.
96:college football
71:
48:The article was
38:
2459:
2458:
2454:
2453:
2452:
2450:
2449:
2448:
2447:
2438:
2252:
1321:
1282:
1275:
1259:
1252:
965:
958:
809:
802:
767:
760:
496:. You're right.
68:
34:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
2457:
2455:
2446:
2445:
2433:
2432:
2414:
2413:
2412:
2411:
2410:
2409:
2408:
2407:
2376:
2375:
2314:
2313:
2299:
2298:
2297:
2296:
2295:
2229:
2228:
2227:
2226:
2206:
2205:
2185:
2184:
2183:
2182:
2181:
2180:
2179:
2178:
2154:
2153:
2146:
2145:
2138:
2137:
2136:
2135:
2126:
2125:
2116:
2115:
2114:
2113:
2104:
2103:
2094:
2093:
2092:
2091:
2087:
2086:
2080:
2079:
2066:
2065:
2064:
2063:
2046:
2045:
2027:
2026:
2025:
2024:
2023:these factors.
2017:
2016:
2010:
2009:
2008:
2007:
1998:
1997:
1990:
1989:
1988:
1987:
1978:
1977:
1971:
1970:
1969:
1968:
1959:
1958:
1944:
1943:
1942:
1941:
1932:
1931:
1924:
1923:
1922:
1921:
1912:
1911:
1905:
1904:
1903:
1902:
1893:
1892:
1885:
1884:
1883:
1882:
1873:
1872:
1866:
1865:
1864:
1863:
1832:
1831:
1830:
1829:
1828:
1827:
1810:
1809:
1795:
1786:
1785:
1779:
1778:
1777:
1776:
1767:
1766:
1760:
1759:
1758:
1757:
1756:
1755:
1754:
1753:
1752:
1751:
1734:
1733:
1712:
1711:
1704:
1703:
1698:
1691:
1690:
1684:
1683:
1682:
1681:
1672:
1671:
1665:
1664:
1663:
1662:
1653:
1652:
1646:
1645:
1644:
1643:
1634:
1633:
1627:
1626:
1625:
1624:
1623:
1622:
1621:
1620:
1619:
1618:
1601:
1600:
1579:
1578:
1577:
1576:
1575:
1574:
1566:
1561:
1556:
1545:
1544:
1543:
1542:
1536:
1535:
1529:
1528:
1527:
1526:
1517:
1516:
1509:
1508:
1507:
1506:
1505:
1504:
1503:
1502:
1501:
1500:
1499:
1498:
1497:
1496:
1490:
1489:
1472:
1471:
1454:
1453:
1432:
1431:
1414:
1413:
1404:
1403:
1397:
1396:
1395:
1394:
1385:
1384:
1355:
1354:
1353:
1352:
1334:
1333:
1315:
1314:
1313:
1312:
1311:
1310:
1309:
1308:
1307:
1306:
1246:
1245:
1244:
1243:
1242:
1233:
1232:
1228:
1227:
1226:
1225:
1224:
1223:
1214:
1213:
1196:
1195:
1189:
1188:
1187:
1186:
1177:
1176:
1170:
1169:
1168:
1167:
1158:
1157:
1151:
1150:
1149:
1148:
1138:
1137:
1131:
1130:
1129:
1128:
1121:
1120:
1118:bad typo here?
1113:
1112:
1111:
1110:
1100:
1099:
1093:
1092:
1091:
1090:
1081:
1080:
1074:
1073:
1072:
1071:
1062:
1061:
1051:
1050:
1049:
1048:
1039:
1038:
1032:
1031:
1030:
1029:
1020:
1019:
1013:
1012:
1011:
1010:
1001:
1000:
992:
991:
953:
952:
951:
950:
944:
943:
937:
936:
935:
934:
925:
924:
918:
917:
916:
915:
909:
908:
902:
901:
900:
899:
890:
889:
883:
882:
881:
880:
871:
870:
864:
863:
862:
861:
852:
851:
845:
844:
843:
842:
833:
832:
826:
825:
824:
823:
822:
821:
820:
819:
818:
817:
794:
793:
776:
775:
752:
751:
745:
744:
740:
739:
738:
737:
728:
727:
715:
714:
713:
712:
680:
679:
678:
677:
676:
675:
666:
665:
664:
663:
662:
628:
627:
613:Note on images
609:
608:
607:
606:
591:
590:
589:
588:
585:2009 NFL Draft
578:
577:
572:
571:
570:
569:
568:
567:
552:
551:
550:
549:
543:
537:
528:
527:
524:
517:
516:
506:
505:
500:
499:
498:
497:
488:
487:
482:
481:
480:
479:
478:
477:
471:
470:
463:
462:
457:
456:
455:
454:
453:
452:
441:
440:
431:
430:
422:
421:
420:
419:
418:
417:
411:
410:
404:
403:
398:
397:
396:
395:
386:
385:
381:
380:
379:
378:
368:
367:
358:
357:
356:
355:
346:
345:
341:
340:
339:
338:
329:
328:
324:
323:
322:
321:
311:
310:
305:
304:
303:
302:
293:
292:
287:
286:
285:
284:
275:
274:
270:
269:
268:
267:
258:
257:
253:
252:
251:
250:
241:
240:
236:
235:
234:
233:
224:
223:
218:
217:
216:
215:
205:
204:
200:
199:
198:
197:
190:
189:
184:
183:
182:
181:
171:
170:
139:
138:
92:featured topic
85:
84:
73:Nominator(s):
67:
62:
61:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2456:
2444:
2441:
2435:
2434:
2431:
2427:
2423:
2419:
2416:
2415:
2406:
2402:
2398:
2394:
2393:
2392:
2391:
2390:
2386:
2382:
2378:
2377:
2374:
2370:
2366:
2362:
2359:
2358:
2357:
2356:
2355:
2354:
2350:
2346:
2342:
2338:
2334:
2330:
2326:
2322:
2318:
2317:Image concern
2312:
2308:
2304:
2300:
2294:
2290:
2286:
2282:
2281:
2280:
2276:
2272:
2268:
2265:
2264:
2263:
2259:
2255:
2248:
2247:
2246:
2245:
2241:
2237:
2233:
2225:
2221:
2217:
2213:
2210:
2209:
2208:
2207:
2204:
2200:
2196:
2193:
2191:
2187:
2186:
2177:
2173:
2169:
2165:
2161:
2160:
2159:
2158:
2156:
2155:
2150:
2149:
2148:
2147:
2143:
2140:
2139:
2133:
2130:
2129:
2128:
2127:
2124:
2122:
2118:
2117:
2111:
2108:
2107:
2106:
2105:
2102:
2100:
2096:
2095:
2089:
2088:
2084:
2083:
2082:
2081:
2077:
2074:
2073:
2072:
2070:
2062:
2058:
2054:
2050:
2049:
2048:
2047:
2044:
2040:
2036:
2033:
2029:
2028:
2021:
2020:
2019:
2018:
2015:
2012:
2011:
2005:
2002:
2001:
2000:
1999:
1996:
1992:
1991:
1985:
1982:
1981:
1980:
1979:
1976:
1973:
1972:
1966:
1963:
1962:
1961:
1960:
1957:
1955:
1951:
1946:
1945:
1939:
1936:
1935:
1934:
1933:
1930:
1926:
1925:
1919:
1916:
1915:
1914:
1913:
1910:
1907:
1906:
1900:
1897:
1896:
1895:
1894:
1891:
1887:
1886:
1880:
1877:
1876:
1875:
1874:
1871:
1868:
1867:
1862:
1858:
1854:
1850:
1849:
1848:
1847:
1846:
1845:
1841:
1837:
1826:
1822:
1818:
1814:
1813:
1812:
1811:
1808:
1804:
1800:
1796:
1793:
1790:
1789:
1788:
1787:
1784:
1781:
1780:
1774:
1771:
1770:
1769:
1768:
1765:
1762:
1761:
1750:
1746:
1742:
1738:
1737:
1736:
1735:
1732:
1728:
1724:
1720:
1716:
1715:
1714:
1713:
1708:
1707:
1706:
1705:
1699:
1695:
1694:
1693:
1692:
1689:
1686:
1685:
1679:
1676:
1675:
1674:
1673:
1670:
1667:
1666:
1660:
1657:
1656:
1655:
1654:
1651:
1648:
1647:
1641:
1638:
1637:
1636:
1635:
1632:
1629:
1628:
1617:
1613:
1609:
1605:
1604:
1603:
1602:
1599:
1595:
1591:
1587:
1586:
1585:
1584:
1583:
1582:
1581:
1580:
1572:
1571:
1570:
1567:
1565:
1562:
1560:
1557:
1555:
1552:
1551:
1550:
1547:
1546:
1540:
1539:
1538:
1537:
1534:
1531:
1530:
1524:
1521:
1520:
1519:
1518:
1515:
1511:
1510:
1494:
1493:
1492:
1491:
1488:
1484:
1480:
1476:
1475:
1474:
1473:
1470:
1466:
1462:
1458:
1457:
1456:
1455:
1452:
1448:
1444:
1440:
1436:
1435:
1434:
1433:
1430:
1426:
1422:
1418:
1417:
1416:
1415:
1411:
1408:
1407:
1406:
1405:
1402:
1399:
1398:
1392:
1389:
1388:
1387:
1386:
1383:
1380:
1379:
1378:
1376:
1373:
1370:
1366:
1362:
1361:
1351:
1347:
1343:
1338:
1337:
1336:
1335:
1332:
1328:
1324:
1317:
1316:
1305:
1301:
1297:
1293:
1292:
1291:
1290:
1289:
1285:
1279:
1278:
1271:
1268:
1267:
1266:
1262:
1256:
1255:
1247:
1240:
1237:
1236:
1235:
1234:
1230:
1229:
1221:
1218:
1217:
1216:
1215:
1212:
1208:
1204:
1200:
1199:
1198:
1197:
1194:
1191:
1190:
1184:
1181:
1180:
1179:
1178:
1175:
1172:
1171:
1165:
1162:
1161:
1160:
1159:
1156:
1153:
1152:
1146:
1142:
1141:
1140:
1139:
1136:
1133:
1132:
1125:
1124:
1123:
1122:
1119:
1115:
1114:
1108:
1104:
1103:
1102:
1101:
1098:
1095:
1094:
1088:
1085:
1084:
1083:
1082:
1079:
1076:
1075:
1069:
1066:
1065:
1064:
1063:
1060:
1058:
1053:
1052:
1046:
1043:
1042:
1041:
1040:
1037:
1034:
1033:
1027:
1024:
1023:
1022:
1021:
1018:
1015:
1014:
1008:
1005:
1004:
1003:
1002:
999:
996:
995:
994:
993:
990:
986:
982:
977:
976:
975:
974:
973:
972:
968:
962:
961:
948:
947:
946:
945:
942:
939:
938:
932:
929:
928:
927:
926:
923:
920:
919:
913:
912:
911:
910:
907:
904:
903:
897:
894:
893:
892:
891:
888:
885:
884:
878:
875:
874:
873:
872:
869:
866:
865:
859:
856:
855:
854:
853:
850:
847:
846:
840:
837:
836:
835:
834:
831:
828:
827:
816:
812:
806:
805:
798:
797:
796:
795:
792:
788:
784:
780:
779:
778:
777:
774:
770:
764:
763:
756:
755:
754:
753:
749:
748:
747:
746:
742:
741:
735:
732:
731:
730:
729:
726:
723:
722:
721:
719:
711:
707:
703:
699:
698:
697:
694:
690:
686:
682:
681:
673:
672:
671:
667:
661:
658:
654:
650:
649:
646:
645:
644:
643:
639:
638:
636:
635:
634:
632:
626:
622:
618:
614:
611:
610:
605:
601:
597:
593:
592:
586:
582:
581:
580:
579:
574:
573:
566:
562:
558:
554:
553:
547:
544:
541:
538:
535:
532:
531:
530:
529:
525:
521:
520:
519:
518:
514:
510:
509:
508:
507:
502:
501:
495:
492:
491:
490:
489:
484:
483:
475:
474:
473:
472:
467:
466:
465:
464:
459:
458:
450:
445:
444:
443:
442:
438:
435:
434:
433:
432:
428:
424:
423:
415:
414:
413:
412:
408:
407:
406:
405:
400:
399:
393:
390:
389:
388:
387:
383:
382:
376:
372:
371:
370:
369:
365:
360:
359:
353:
350:
349:
348:
347:
343:
342:
336:
333:
332:
331:
330:
326:
325:
318:
315:
314:
313:
312:
307:
306:
300:
297:
296:
295:
294:
289:
288:
282:
279:
278:
277:
276:
272:
271:
265:
262:
261:
260:
259:
255:
254:
248:
245:
244:
243:
242:
238:
237:
231:
228:
227:
226:
225:
220:
219:
213:
209:
208:
207:
206:
202:
201:
194:
193:
192:
191:
186:
185:
179:
175:
174:
173:
172:
168:
164:
163:
162:
161:
160:
159:
155:
151:
147:
143:
137:
133:
129:
125:
122:
121:
120:
119:
115:
111:
106:
102:
97:
93:
90:
82:
80:
76:
70:
69:
66:
63:
60:
58:
55:
51:
44:
42:
37:
32:
27:
26:
19:
2439:
2436:
2417:
2360:
2336:
2332:
2328:
2324:
2316:
2315:
2231:
2230:
2211:
2189:
2188:
2163:
2141:
2131:
2120:
2119:
2109:
2098:
2097:
2075:
2068:
2067:
2030:
2013:
2003:
1993:
1983:
1974:
1964:
1953:
1949:
1947:
1937:
1927:
1917:
1908:
1898:
1888:
1878:
1869:
1833:
1791:
1782:
1772:
1763:
1687:
1677:
1668:
1658:
1649:
1639:
1630:
1568:
1563:
1558:
1553:
1548:
1532:
1522:
1512:
1409:
1400:
1390:
1381:
1371:
1359:
1357:
1356:
1273:
1269:
1250:
1238:
1219:
1192:
1182:
1173:
1163:
1154:
1144:
1134:
1116:
1106:
1096:
1086:
1077:
1067:
1056:
1054:
1044:
1035:
1025:
1016:
1006:
997:
956:
954:
940:
930:
921:
905:
895:
886:
876:
867:
857:
848:
838:
829:
800:
758:
733:
724:
717:
716:
684:
668:
640:
630:
629:
612:
493:
436:
391:
374:
351:
334:
316:
298:
280:
263:
246:
229:
211:
177:
145:
141:
140:
123:
86:
72:
49:
47:
35:
28:
2162:Good idea.
210:Good idea.
2397:JKBrooks85
2365:JKBrooks85
2331:" to the "
2303:JKBrooks85
2285:JKBrooks85
2236:Rreagan007
2216:JKBrooks85
2168:JKBrooks85
2053:JKBrooks85
1920:to "gain".
1853:JKBrooks85
1799:Strikehold
1741:JKBrooks85
1590:Strikehold
1461:JKBrooks85
1342:JKBrooks85
1296:JKBrooks85
1276:Giants2008
1253:Giants2008
1222:to "with".
1203:Strikehold
981:JKBrooks85
959:Giants2008
803:Giants2008
783:JKBrooks85
761:Giants2008
702:JKBrooks85
617:JKBrooks85
596:JKBrooks85
557:JKBrooks85
150:Strikehold
128:Strikehold
110:JKBrooks85
75:JKBrooks85
2381:Jappalang
2345:Jappalang
2195:Oldelpaso
1719:WT:MOSNUM
1439:WP:ACCESS
576:interest?
222:"parity"?
2395:Thanks.
2271:Dabomb87
2152:subject.
2069:Comments
2035:Dabomb87
1836:Dabomb87
1817:Dabomb87
1723:Dabomb87
1608:Dabomb87
1479:Dabomb87
1443:Dabomb87
1421:Dabomb87
1375:contribs
1365:Dabomb87
1360:Comments
1358:Support
718:Comments
689:Ealdgyth
653:Ealdgyth
631:Comments
486:defense?
392:Replaced
335:Reworded
264:Reworded
247:Reworded
230:Reworded
188:however.
142:Comments
50:promoted
2422:Dincher
2418:Support
2341:WP:NFCC
2253:Georgia
2232:Support
2212:Removed
2164:Changed
2132:Removed
2004:Changed
1984:Removed
1965:Changed
1938:Changed
1918:Changed
1773:Removed
1678:Removed
1659:Removed
1640:Removed
1322:Georgia
1270:Support
1220:Changed
1107:Removed
1068:Removed
1026:Removed
461:season?
352:Removed
317:Removed
167:WP:LEAD
165:As per
124:Support
54:Raul654
1954:really
1950:really
1183:Linked
1127:twice.
1105:Nope.
979:case.
670:site).
196:think.
2251:Sandy
2110:Fixed
1899:Fixed
1879:Split
1523:Fixed
1410:Added
1391:Fixed
1363:from
1320:Sandy
1283:17-14
1260:17-14
1239:Added
1164:Fixed
1145:Moved
1087:Fixed
1045:Fixed
1007:Fixed
966:17-14
931:Fixed
896:Fixed
877:Fixed
858:Fixed
839:Fixed
810:17-14
768:17-14
734:Fixed
494:Fixed
437:Fixed
375:fixed
299:Fixed
281:Fixed
212:Added
178:Fixed
16:<
2426:talk
2401:talk
2385:talk
2369:talk
2361:Done
2349:talk
2307:talk
2289:talk
2275:talk
2258:Talk
2240:talk
2220:talk
2199:talk
2172:talk
2057:talk
2039:talk
1995:sent
1929:ran.
1857:talk
1840:talk
1821:talk
1803:talk
1792:Done
1745:talk
1727:talk
1612:talk
1594:talk
1483:talk
1465:talk
1447:talk
1425:talk
1369:talk
1346:talk
1327:Talk
1300:talk
1207:talk
985:talk
787:talk
706:talk
693:Talk
657:Talk
621:talk
600:talk
561:talk
540:Wapo
449:ESPN
154:talk
132:talk
114:talk
103:and
79:talk
2321:RFC
1710:do.
1441:).
320:it.
52:by
2428:)
2403:)
2387:)
2371:)
2351:)
2309:)
2291:)
2277:)
2260:)
2242:)
2222:)
2201:)
2174:)
2166:.
2059:)
2041:)
1952:,
1859:)
1842:)
1823:)
1805:)
1747:)
1729:)
1702:6.
1614:)
1596:)
1485:)
1467:)
1449:)
1427:)
1348:)
1329:)
1302:)
1286:)
1263:)
1209:)
1057:up
987:)
969:)
813:)
789:)
771:)
708:)
691:-
655:-
633:-
623:)
602:)
563:)
451:).
429:).
156:)
134:)
116:)
59:.
33:.
2424:(
2399:(
2383:(
2367:(
2347:(
2305:(
2287:(
2273:(
2256:(
2238:(
2218:(
2197:(
2170:(
2134:.
2055:(
2037:(
2006:.
1986:.
1967:.
1940:.
1901:.
1881:.
1855:(
1838:(
1819:(
1801:(
1794:.
1775:.
1743:(
1725:(
1697:7
1680:.
1661:.
1642:.
1610:(
1592:(
1525:.
1481:(
1463:(
1445:(
1423:(
1393:.
1372:·
1367:(
1344:(
1325:(
1298:(
1280:(
1257:(
1241:.
1205:(
1185:.
1166:.
1147:.
1109:.
1070:.
1028:.
1009:.
983:(
963:(
933:.
898:.
879:.
860:.
841:.
807:(
785:(
765:(
736:.
704:(
619:(
598:(
559:(
377:.
366:.
337:.
301:.
283:.
266:.
249:.
232:.
214:.
180:.
152:(
130:(
112:(
81:)
77:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.