422:
undetected species, including a taxon specific to
Dunedin (southern South Island, New Zealand). However, almost nothing is known about the geographic range and variability of this species, nor indeed whether it comprises one or more cryptic taxa. ... Two principal groups with a boundary on the east coast of New Zealand near the mouth of the Taieri River can be defined, and these are denoted "Dunedin" and "Catlins" peripatus. There is a third, possibly distinct lineage at Piano Flat. A rearrangement of the mitochondrial genome, relating to the position of the tLEU ma gene, was detected in these and other New Zealand peripatus and may be present in all Onychophora." I'll let you decide how to use that info (or not) in the article.
408:
invertebrate habitat. The reserve contains an unusually high density of the invertebrate." Unfortunately, it neglects to actually name the genus/species in question, and does not give a source for these statements, so is not really a good reference to use (IMO). Reference 14 (New
England Entomologist 1996, 19:51) is also somewhat vague: describing one of "five distinct groups of viviparous New Zealand onychophorans", it goes on to say "Morphological examination suggests that a new genus exists in the Leith Valley and Caversham regions of Dunedin", then corroborates this statement with unpublished data. A bit more digging: site has a photo (but doesn't give a name, just mentions that its ovoviviparous).
625:
sheds in the complex collapsing, once a building is gone its gone theres no way to photograph it. In short decide how many photographs are really necessary for the article, then decide what you want to have photos of. There's 15 photographs in the article excluding the map, 1 for the notsble people(Grimmette rather than the dunedin building) I suggest reducing the number by about 4-6 thats leaves the article with 8-10 photos enough to break the text up but not enough to crowd the image.
638:
photos and the map, which is hopefully not so many as to be disruptive. Yes, I'm a local (I live 2.5 km away in St Clair) - problem is we're in the middle of some pretty lousy early winter weather, so getting good looking photos of anywhere at the moment might be a problem. I take your point about the threatened church, though. Also, it would be difficult to get photos which show several of the things together (the
Baptist Church and school gate, maybe, but that would be about it).
852:: I think this article is generally excellent and is very close to meeting the criteria, and I'm leaning toward support. However, the lead needs to be expanded to become a true summary of the whole article, and I have some other small concerns. In the interest of full disclosure, I should add that I reviewed this article twice before, once on 19 March 2009 and again on 18 April 2009. The second review was not done as part of the formal peer-review process but appears here:
1000:, you'll find an explanation of the various families of citation templates. They vary somewhat in the way they format elements, and they can't be mixed in the same article. The "cite" family uses full stops between elements and therefore a capital "R" at the beginning of the final element. You haven't used templates, but you still have to choose a format and stick with it.
474:"Other sporting associations with the suburb..." "within?" - Definitely not! "Within' would be incorrect grammar, at least in NZ (you associate one thing with another, not within it). In any case, as pointed out, these connections are not all within the suburb - the football club, though named for Caversham (and therefore associated with it) is not located within the suburb.
1581:. If you can find a better base image to use and can convert all the Dunedin suburb maps, fine - if not, it the alternative suggested would reduce both the amount of information and the uniformity of the Dunedin suburban article maps. As a compromise solution, I've created a new, larger, slightly clearer version of the file in png format - I hope that will be acceptable.
881:
parenthetical words form a complete sentence, I think the punctuation should look like this: "The left-leaning politics of the area is still reflected to some extent in local political views. (The
Dunedin South electorate, of which Caversham is a part, tends to return New Zealand Labour Party Members of Parliament and support this and other left-of-centre parties.)"
276:"It is occasionally simply referred to as "Hillside", after the house of the city's founding father Captain William Cargill which was located here, overlooking "The Flat", as the plain stretching across to the Pacific coast was (and is still) locally known." Try reading this out loud and see if you agree that the sentence seems run-on.
1244:, others say it's a completely separate species. It has only been found in Caversham and the Leith Valley, some 10 km to the north, and is definitely endemic to the Dunedin area. Unfortunately most of the on-line resources relating to it are abstracts only, so using them as references isn't perfect... but I'll see what I can find.
886:"A large proportion of the suburb's houses are small, with 39% being either one- or two-bedroom dwellings." - I'd suggest revising this to eliminate the "with plus -ing" construction. Here's a possibility: "A large proportion of the suburb's houses, 39% of which have either one or two bedrooms, are small."
1444:, because rhotic speakers would have an /r/ sound in there. (Yes, I know New Zealand English is non-rhotic, but that doesn't mean New Zealnders are the only people to ever pronounce the name.) Also, showing the stress is a good idea; pronouncing dictionaries and encyclopedias pretty much always do that. +
135:; today it is a 46k article (larger than many articles on entire New Zealand cities) - well written (I believe), thoroughly referenced (again, I believe), extensively augmented by pictures, templates, and map, and... well, just the sort of thing that an FA candidate should be. The article has undergone a
1111:, though i still feel it could explain things a bit more clearly. I've fixed the two stray sentences in the education system that I failed to notice the mention of above, BTW, and changed the Cohen sentence to use a "was". That just leaves the lede and the Lisburn House comments to do at the weekend.
901:
Landmarks: "The most impressive private residence in
Caversham is Lisburn House... " - The "most impressive" claim needs a source. Since the source for the next sentence says, "Lisburn House is one of the finest townhouses of the 1860s in New Zealand", you could tweak the "most impressive" sentence a
407:
This cryptic species has piqued my interest. Reference 13 (The Forest
Reserve Document Plan) claims "The reserve provides a moist forest habitat for a new genus and species of invertebrate (Onychophora) apparently endemic to Dunedin City. This forest extends beyond the reserve boundaries, as does the
880:
Demographics: "The left-leaning politics of the area is still reflected to some extent in local political views (the
Dunedin South electorate, of which Caversham is a part, tends to return New Zealand Labour Party Members of Parliament and support this and other left-of-centre parties)." - Since the
637:
I've reduced the number of images by three, taking out the
Anscombe building, the SH1 one and one of the churches, and swapping the Lookout Point ones at the top and bottom of the article. I think the Lisburn House one is quite important - it really is Caversham's best-known building. That leaves 12
186:
directly contradicts itself, which isn't helpful, either) - but that's by the by. Given that I've now had two piece of advice stating the opposite to each other, if you don't mind I'll wait to hear what others think about it one way or the other. If others also say the short form is better, then the
421:
Trewick, S. A. (1999). Molecular diversity of
Dunedin peripatus (Onychophora: Peripatopsidae). NZ J. Zool. 26:381–393. "The application of allozyme electrophoresis to New Zealand peripatus that were thought to belong to a single widespread species (Peripatoides novaezealandiae) has revealed several
718:
Otherwise, sources look okay, links checked out with the link checker tool. As to the short vs long footnote issue, I've noted that most city/state/region/country articles use the long format. I slightly prefer the short but it's a matter of taste, either is correct (as long as you're consistent).
130:
I am nominating this for featured article because I believe it is an excellent example of a
Knowledge (XXG) article, on a topic area not much covered by current FAs (an urban area in New Zealand), and one with some notable and unique features - among them a notable international sports venue and a
624:
since its under threat of demolition, from personal experience I'm kicking myself for not photographing a historical house(already fire damaged) near here before they commenced developement near it as the buildings were severly damage by the earth works with two of the main walls and three of the
568:
I've expanded the notable people section to include more information, and added a photo of Grimmett and one of one of Anscombe's more notable buildings. Hopefully that will be enough to override the problem with the photos. Sadly none of the Caversham pictures are of buildings by Anscombe, or it
930:
that a shortened footnote form would make the citations more cleanly readable. It would be no big deal to move the Alma Rutherford bibliographic data, for example, to a "Works cited" section and then to substitute "Rutherford, pp. X–Y" in place of the long refs. I'd be happy to make the changes
619:
Photo choices are difficult because everyone sees things differently I'd still support promotion of the article anyway. I'm presuming the place is close to home for you given the number of and location choices for photographs, if thats the case then maybe some different compositional images are
969:√Housing - I've changed it to "Many residents of Caversham are still of relatively low socio-economic status when compared to those in surrounding hill suburbs. A 2007 Dunedin City Council report indicated that a high proportion (39%) of the suburb's houses were one- or two-bedroom dwellings."
552:
I know its linked but a link one or two of his works would just explain for a passing reader, I also reworded the open sentence to improve the flow which I originally found difficult to read. Visually the string of images down the right side especially with the common theme of street scenes is
986:
does them that way. There, the general idea seems to be that those following an article and publication name use ". Retrieved..." and those following an article name alone use ", retrieved..." If this is not the case, I'll tidy up the article, but I'd recommend that the templates at
569:
would have been easier to tie one in as you suggested, but in most cases the pictures do relate directly to the text. It is beginning to get overloaded with images, though - if necessary losing one of the church pictures or the view down Caversham Valley Road would seem reasonable.
736:) reference, so it can refer to both quite happily. As far as I can tell, other editors have fixed up the italics problem. As for Caversham FC, the *&^%*s have revamped their website in the last month and the history section has now gone. I'll have to find another reference...
1029:
are autoformatted, as you say. I would delink them now, but I don't want to risk violating a temporary arbitration committee injunction against mass date delinking. However, you will not be violating the injunction by delinking the dates in the Caversham article.
308:"The multidisciplinary nature of the study has allowed for information of subjects ranging from urban planning to gender studies." Not sure what is meant by the phrase "allowed for information". The phrase "has allowed for" is then repeated in the next sentence.
787:
The Hyland one's fixed, too. They didn't make it easy to find the name - I had to work backwards from the authors. The two authors are the leading members of the Old Caversham Rail Tunnel Preservation Group, and they are the publishers of the site.
131:
unique historical academic survey. I feel a little reticent about describing it as "excellent" given that I have been the primary author on it, but hope that it isn't simply hubris on my part: two months ago, this was simply a redirect to
252:
is currently 5 paragraphs, including a short one of 3 sentences, and that finicky MOS states "As a general guideline, the lead should be no longer than four paragraphs." Might it be possible to incorporate that short paragraph into the
699:, use the work field for the title of the paper, and the publisher field for the name of the actual company that publishes the paper (I noted a few Otago Daily Times that were missing italics, especially up towards the beginning)
1046:
I've no objection to you changing the footnote style - one of the other editors of the article has also offered help with that - either of you could do the job probably molre effectively than me, so feel free to go for it (and
94:
1180:: Thank you for responding quickly to all of my suggestions, especially for re-working the lede. I believe the article meets all the criteria. If I ever visit Cavendish, I'll be sure to seek out the Lisburn House.
1081:. While I was doing that, I fixed the "R" problem and unlinked the linked dates except those that are parts of book or article titles. I'm striking the finished things to make it easier to see what's left to do.
1311:: this image is missing information by which its details (year taken, under which country's copyright laws) can be verified. Regardless, it appears that Getty Images claims copyright on it (which might be true).
553:
distracting, maybe reduce the number or even add a persons image in the notable people to break it up, consider if the building images can be linked to Anscombe or Thomson just to tie them in beyond decorations
620:
possible where by you can combine subjects like having a street view with multiple churches in it or the town centre and a church. There is one church I think is an important image(not in there) and thats the
972:
Both "was" and "had been" work, with slightly different emphasis. I used "had been" since it referred t a time before the events mentioned in the previous sentence. I can change it to "was" if you prefer,
386:
An adult training centre is an adult training centre. That's the only term I've ever heard used for one, and that's what its website refers to it as. I've linked it to adult education, though that's not
732:
I would have thought that VicDir was a reliable enough source, but if not, I shall hunt down another. As to the trains.wellington reference, all the necessary info cited there is also in the following (
182:
Sigh. I had quite a few of them in that format, but it was suggested to me that the long form was better. To be honest, a lot of the footnoting protocols seem very convoluted (there are places where
1240:
I'd love to be able to give you details of its species name, but the scientists can't agree themselves yet - but yes, it should read species, not genus. Some seem to claim it's a subspecies of
346:"Opened in 1883, the ground has a capacity of 35,000," I would use venue instead of ground, but this may just be a British English terminology, in which case never mind. Also, specify 35,000
753:
I've found a reference that works pretty nearly as well for the Caversham football club. That only leaves the VicDir one to replace... I'll deal with that later when I have a bit more time.
1460:
I've changed it to your suggestion. Actually, in the far south of New Zealand there is a slight rhotic tendency due to the Scottish origins of many of the early settlers (it's called the "
445:
There's a bit more on this creature in my reply to Gadfium further down this page. It's a recent discovery, and there are two schools of thought - either it's a subspecies of the NZ-only
719:
You can even combine the two into one, give the long form for the first instance of a book, then a shortened for for all subsequent refs (as long as you give page numbers, it's good).
136:
860:
has improved the article considerably since then, and these new suggestions are about things that I did not see or did not think to mention on either of the first two sweeps.
143:) after that, he indicated that he thought that - with extra referencing - it was close to FA standard. There is now considerably more referencing than there was at that time.
865:
Lead: The existing lead is awfully thin. I would suggest adding at least a brief mention of governance, demographics, education, the economy, landmarks, and notable people.
613:
link. I'd also drop the statehighway 1 image, along with lisburn house and with the economy section I'd drop the town centre/hillside road and move the ropewalk there.
960:√Caversham Project: I've reformatted it slightly, turning it into two paragraphs rather than the previous three. One paragraph is a little thin for a separate section.
40:
1322:
instead? It is verifiably PD-Australia and should be PD-US as well by virtue of non-publishing under US copyrights during 1923–77 and compliant with URAA.
1128:
I've tweaked the Lisburn House information as you suggested, and also added in a little more info on it from another source. That just leaves the lede.
831:
More a case of this bit being left behind when some copyediting was done - I've reworded that paragraph so that this is no longer a sentence fragment.
907:"Unusual among Dunedin buildings, this church has a severe Classical style, with its brickwork augmented by pediments and square columns." - Wikilink
1224:(velvet worm) only names the phylum and not the genus. Could you find a more specific reference please. Also, I'm a bit confused by it being called
815:"Caversham Primary School, located at the corner of South Road and Surrey Street." Is this a case of part of a sentence being inadvertently deleted?
30:
17:
1052:
I've ticked the ones I've dealt with. As I said, I should have time to tackle the rest over the weekend, though sadly probably not until then.
295:(velvet worm) believed to be endemic to the Dunedin area." If the worm is found in other areas (eg. Costa Rica), shouldn't it rather be called
411:
Ah, this paper probably has the answer. Unfortunately, I don't have web access to it, so I'll just post the relevant part from the abstract:
110:
1609:
1593:
1562:
1519:
1502:
1476:
1455:
1417:
1396:
1370:
1350:
1331:
1288:
1273:
1256:
1234:
1211:
1189:
1161:
1140:
1123:
1090:
1064:
1039:
1009:
945:
843:
825:
800:
782:
765:
748:
727:
650:
632:
581:
560:
531:
505:
488:
465:
431:
242:
216:
199:
176:
155:
85:
870:
Caversham Project: I'd consider merging the whole section into a single paragraph. The two one-sentence orphans look a little odd to me.
281:"...who was largely responsible for the joining of the Kai Tahu and Kati Mamoe iwi." Passive voice, change "the joining of" to "joining"
1430:, which is to show /r/ sounds wherever rhotic speakers, and allow non-rhotic speakers to simply ignore them as necessary. Thus I'd use
548:
needs some meat to expand as to why the people notable, like I did with Grimmett just adding Wisden cricketer of the year 1931, who is
891:"In 1889, Mark Cohen had been a major figure behind the founding of New Zealand's first kindergarten." - "Was" instead of "had been"?
599:
which is in the transportation section, ah ok just noticed all the photos you have provided are hosted here suggest that they be on
115:
286:"...the school was later a boys' home, and is now an adult training centre." What's an adult training center? Adult education?
596:
1571:
1545:
1427:
954:
Thanks for all that - I'll tackle these when I get time (hopefully this weekend. Some comments on each of your points:
853:
164:
607:
916:
References: Some of the citations end with "retrieved on" and some with "Retrieved on". Capital "R" is standard.
875:
Governance: "Its current MP is Clare Curran (Labour)." - Suggestion: Its MP as of 2009 is Clare Curran (Labour).
1308:
479:
Sorry, was reading "sporting association" like "sporting organizations", rather than the meaning you intended.
1578:
1538:
712:
Current ref 26 (Hyland...) is lacking a publisher (would appear to be the tunnel preservation organization?)
1319:
1149:
happy with it (it feels a little too long but also very "bullet-pointy"), but it's far better than it was.
545:
64:
394:
is only found in the Dunedin area. It isn't found as far away as Christchurch, let alone Costa Rica. The
966:√Demographics - I've split it into two sentences - and removed the parentheses, which now seem redundant
493:
Ah, okay - that makes perfect sense. I've changed the word "associations" to "links", which is clearer.
296:
1346:
1327:
1185:
1086:
1035:
1005:
941:
629:
557:
1587:
1513:
1470:
1411:
1364:
1312:
1267:
1250:
1205:
1155:
1134:
1117:
1058:
837:
821:
794:
776:
759:
742:
724:
693:
673:
644:
575:
525:
499:
459:
226:
I'm leaning towards support, but wanted to first mention some minor issues I found with a reread:
210:
193:
149:
132:
79:
1577:
wouldn't show its location within Dunedin, and all Dunedin suburbs use the same basic image as
1283:
1229:
600:
1228:, since the genus also exists in other places. Presumably the species is endemic to Dunedin.-
770:
Realised the AA atlas works just as well as the VicDir source, so used that reference again.
249:
1541:
seems pretty low-quality (JPEG is really disfavored for maps). Wouldn't it be better to use
1440:
1433:
1385:, please add pronunciation info for "Caversham". (I'll help you with the IPA if you want.) +
976:
Lisburn House - will look for a reference, if not, combining the sentences seems reasonable.
484:
449:
or it's a distinct species onl,y so far found around Dunedin. Either way, it's endemic. The
427:
238:
172:
1358:
Done. That other picture was listed as PD when I added it to the article, honest guv... :)
1108:
1026:
1017:
997:
988:
983:
183:
1485:
1604:
1557:
1497:
1461:
1450:
1391:
1342:
1323:
1181:
1082:
1031:
1001:
937:
626:
554:
140:
896:
I'd suggest merging the two one-sentence orphan paragraphs at the end of this section.
1582:
1508:
1465:
1406:
1359:
1262:
1245:
1200:
1150:
1129:
1112:
1053:
932:
857:
832:
817:
789:
771:
754:
737:
720:
639:
570:
520:
494:
454:
205:
188:
144:
74:
53:
1107:
Thanks very much for all that help. You're right that i was fooled by the layout of
355:"...this church has a severe Classical style" is "severe" the best adjective to use?
1481:
Great! I've removed the unnecessary slashes both in the article and here. (The tag
318:
595:
Looking at the photo choices with the lookout point sumit image I'd replace with
1598:
Okay, the png looks a bit better, and I can see that consistency is important. +
1464:" or "Southland R"). Less common as far north as Dunedin, but still acceptable.
1078:
927:
704:
680:
514:"Ground" would definitely be the local usage in this sentence rather than venue.
480:
423:
314:
234:
168:
1314:
Note: cricinfo's other photos are not recommended for use either (those by the
519:
Other than these quibbles, though, all the suggested changes have been made.
1599:
1552:
1492:
1445:
1423:
1402:
1386:
1221:
292:
689:
Newspapers titles in the references should be in italics. If you're using
908:
326:"A small handful of shops..." Rather colloquial... how about just "A few"
300:
1225:
383:
of these, though there's a few where the changes would not be useful:
39:
Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in
1145:...and I've rewritten the lede, thoroughly extending it. I'm not
921:
The linked publication dates in the citations should be unlinked.
369:"Architect Edmund Anscombe was a Caversham resident," comma-: -->
1507:
Thanks for that - and for your help and suggestions in general.
167:
format and apply that style to the references in this article.
674:
http://nz.vicdir.com/sn136021-0-lookout-point-fire-station.htm
331:"Other sporting associations with the suburb..." with -: -->
95:
Featured article candidates/Caversham, New Zealand/archive1
139:, and - in a talk page message with the leading reviewer (
1318:
would have to abide UK laws). Might I recommend you use
1077:
I re-arranged the citations along the lines suggested by
120:
1383:
230:
The article looks like FA quality to me, so I will now
57:
204:
Finetooth dealt with it, so it's in short-format now.
1020:, which appears to be in need of a total overhaul.
603:then you can have a lot more photographs etc in a
303:? (Also, as a genus name, it should be italicized)
1621:The above discussion is preserved as an archive.
963:√Governance - yup - should be "as of 2009". Done.
1341:Images are verifiably licensed for free usage.
41:Knowledge (XXG) talk:Featured article candidates
1016:Linked publication dates - again, this follows
996:I think I see what has happened. At the top of
43:. No further edits should be made to this page.
854:Talk:Caversham, New Zealand#Second peer review
1627:No further edits should be made to this page.
705:http://www.cavershamafc.co.nz/Pages/Club.html
681:http://trains.wellington.net.nz/tunnels2.html
29:The following is an archived discussion of a
8:
544:I like what I've read though the section on
1195:Any time - and thanks for all the help (Cav
669:What makes the following reliable sources?
18:Knowledge (XXG):Featured article candidates
99:
224:Glad to see the reference format change!
102:
92:
453:link I provided has more information.
1439:
1432:
1426:doesn't use the style recommended at
622:South Dunedin Wesley Methodist Church
7:
982:"Retrieved on..." is a mess because
398:may be found there, this particular
390:as explained below, this species of
163:I highly recommend to check out the
24:
1282:this article becoming featured.-
1025:Alas, some of the full dates in
957:Lead - agreed. Will tackle that.
1567:Unfortunately, no it wouldn't.
1401:Done, thanks to the article on
1382:. In view of the discussion at
902:bit and cite this same source.
1:
597:File:DunedinfromLookoutPt.jpg
321:in the "Demographics" section
291:"...including one species of
1242:peripatoides novaezealandiae
589:the articles promotion ....
1491:adds them automatically.) +
271:referred to as "Hillside","
31:featured article nomination
1644:
1422:Well, the problem is that
1309:File:Clarrie Grimmett.JPG
550:Architect Edmund Anscombe
1624:Please do not modify it.
1610:12:41, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
1594:19:49, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
1572:Location map New Zealand
1563:19:29, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
1546:Location map New Zealand
1520:10:28, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
1503:10:15, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
1477:23:25, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
1456:12:41, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
1418:19:49, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
1397:17:30, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
1371:12:09, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
1351:10:28, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
1332:10:28, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
1289:05:02, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
1274:04:21, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
1257:04:09, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
1235:03:01, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
1220:: The ref given for the
1212:02:46, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
1190:01:44, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
1162:02:01, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
1141:07:05, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
1124:01:48, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
1091:00:08, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
1065:05:36, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
1040:17:43, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
1010:17:43, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
946:04:14, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
532:21:00, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
506:00:44, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
489:22:29, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
466:00:44, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
432:22:29, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
243:22:29, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
217:02:46, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
36:Please do not modify it.
1316:Cricketer International
844:02:00, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
826:01:46, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
801:01:06, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
783:02:00, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
766:01:30, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
749:01:16, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
728:17:54, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
651:06:06, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
633:02:11, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
616:</thoughts only: -->
582:01:16, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
561:11:15, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
200:06:24, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
177:03:25, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
156:02:20, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
86:02:20, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
1579:File:CavershamDnNZ.jpg
1539:File:CavershamDnNZ.jpg
979:√Pediments, yup. Done.
592:<thoughts only: -->
65:Caversham, New Zealand
1320:File:Grimmett1937.jpg
991:are similarly tidied.
364:constructed in 1893,"
337:"The workshops cover
313:suggest wikilinking
267:"It is occasionally
1278:Great, thanks. Now
187:short form it is.
56:21:05, 19 May 2009
1428:WP:IPA for English
447:p. novaezealandiae
165:shortened footnote
133:Suburbs of Dunedin
1590:
1516:
1473:
1414:
1367:
1300:One image concern
1270:
1253:
1208:
1158:
1137:
1120:
1061:
840:
797:
779:
762:
745:
647:
601:Wikimedia Commons
578:
528:
502:
462:
451:New Zealand Etym.
213:
196:
152:
128:
127:
89:
82:
1635:
1626:
1588:
1576:
1570:
1550:
1544:
1514:
1490:
1484:
1471:
1443:
1436:
1412:
1365:
1286:
1268:
1251:
1232:
1206:
1156:
1135:
1118:
1059:
838:
795:
777:
760:
743:
698:
692:
645:
612:
608:Commons category
606:
576:
526:
500:
460:
360:"This building,
211:
194:
150:
100:
80:
71:
48:The article was
38:
1643:
1642:
1638:
1637:
1636:
1634:
1633:
1632:
1631:
1622:
1574:
1568:
1548:
1542:
1535:Another comment
1488:
1482:
1284:
1230:
696:
690:
610:
604:
258:"known locally
68:
34:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1641:
1639:
1630:
1629:
1617:
1616:
1615:
1614:
1613:
1612:
1532:
1531:
1530:
1529:
1528:
1527:
1526:
1525:
1524:
1523:
1522:
1462:Southland burr
1376:
1375:
1374:
1373:
1335:
1334:
1296:
1295:
1294:
1293:
1292:
1291:
1215:
1214:
1175:
1174:
1173:
1172:
1171:
1170:
1169:
1168:
1167:
1166:
1165:
1164:
1098:
1097:
1096:
1095:
1094:
1093:
1070:
1069:
1068:
1067:
1050:
1049:
1048:
1043:
1042:
1022:
1021:
1013:
1012:
993:
992:
980:
977:
974:
970:
967:
964:
961:
958:
949:
948:
923:
918:
913:
904:
898:
893:
888:
883:
877:
872:
867:
847:
846:
812:
811:
810:
809:
808:
807:
806:
805:
804:
803:
715:
714:
709:
701:
686:
685:
684:
677:
667:
660:
659:
658:
657:
656:
655:
654:
653:
546:Notable people
539:
538:
537:
536:
535:
534:
517:
516:
515:
511:
510:
509:
508:
476:
475:
471:
470:
469:
468:
419:
418:
417:
416:
415:
414:
413:
412:
409:
404:
403:
388:
372:
371:
366:
365:
357:
356:
352:
351:
343:
342:
341:8 hectares..."
334:
333:
328:
327:
323:
322:
310:
309:
305:
304:
288:
287:
283:
282:
278:
277:
273:
272:
264:
263:
262:as "The Glen""
255:
254:
222:
221:
220:
219:
141:user:Finetooth
126:
125:
124:
123:
121:External links
118:
113:
105:
104:
98:
97:
91:
90:
73:Nominator(s):
67:
62:
61:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1640:
1628:
1625:
1619:
1618:
1611:
1608:
1607:
1603:
1602:
1597:
1596:
1595:
1592:
1591:
1584:
1580:
1573:
1566:
1565:
1564:
1561:
1560:
1556:
1555:
1547:
1540:
1536:
1533:
1521:
1518:
1517:
1510:
1506:
1505:
1504:
1501:
1500:
1496:
1495:
1487:
1480:
1479:
1478:
1475:
1474:
1467:
1463:
1459:
1458:
1457:
1454:
1453:
1449:
1448:
1442:
1438:
1435:
1434://ˈkævərʃəm//
1429:
1425:
1421:
1420:
1419:
1416:
1415:
1408:
1404:
1400:
1399:
1398:
1395:
1394:
1390:
1389:
1384:
1381:
1378:
1377:
1372:
1369:
1368:
1361:
1357:
1356:
1355:
1354:
1353:
1352:
1348:
1344:
1340:
1336:
1333:
1329:
1325:
1321:
1317:
1313:
1310:
1307:
1306:
1304:
1303:
1301:
1290:
1287:
1281:
1277:
1276:
1275:
1272:
1271:
1264:
1260:
1259:
1258:
1255:
1254:
1247:
1243:
1239:
1238:
1237:
1236:
1233:
1227:
1223:
1219:
1213:
1210:
1209:
1202:
1198:
1194:
1193:
1192:
1191:
1187:
1183:
1179:
1163:
1160:
1159:
1152:
1148:
1144:
1143:
1142:
1139:
1138:
1131:
1127:
1126:
1125:
1122:
1121:
1114:
1110:
1106:
1105:
1104:
1103:
1102:
1101:
1100:
1099:
1092:
1088:
1084:
1080:
1076:
1075:
1074:
1073:
1072:
1071:
1066:
1063:
1062:
1055:
1051:
1045:
1044:
1041:
1037:
1033:
1028:
1024:
1023:
1019:
1015:
1014:
1011:
1007:
1003:
999:
995:
994:
990:
985:
981:
978:
975:
971:
968:
965:
962:
959:
956:
955:
953:
952:
951:
950:
947:
943:
939:
936:
934:
933:User:Grutness
929:
926:I agree with
924:
922:
919:
917:
914:
912:
910:
905:
903:
899:
897:
894:
892:
889:
887:
884:
882:
878:
876:
873:
871:
868:
866:
863:
862:
861:
859:
858:User:Grutness
855:
851:
845:
842:
841:
834:
830:
829:
828:
827:
823:
819:
816:
802:
799:
798:
791:
786:
785:
784:
781:
780:
773:
769:
768:
767:
764:
763:
756:
752:
751:
750:
747:
746:
739:
735:
734:Otago Witness
731:
730:
729:
726:
722:
717:
716:
713:
710:
708:
706:
702:
700:
695:
687:
683:
682:
678:
676:
675:
671:
670:
668:
665:
662:
661:
652:
649:
648:
641:
636:
635:
634:
631:
628:
623:
618:
617:
609:
602:
598:
594:
593:
588:
585:
584:
583:
580:
579:
572:
567:
566:
565:
564:
563:
562:
559:
556:
551:
547:
543:
533:
530:
529:
522:
518:
513:
512:
507:
504:
503:
496:
492:
491:
490:
486:
482:
478:
477:
473:
472:
467:
464:
463:
456:
452:
448:
444:
443:
442:
441:
440:
439:
438:
437:
436:
435:
434:
433:
429:
425:
410:
406:
405:
401:
397:
393:
389:
385:
384:
382:
379:I've changed
378:
377:
376:
375:
374:
373:
368:
367:
363:
359:
358:
354:
353:
349:
345:
344:
340:
336:
335:
330:
329:
325:
324:
320:
316:
312:
311:
307:
306:
302:
298:
294:
290:
289:
285:
284:
280:
279:
275:
274:
270:
266:
265:
261:
257:
256:
251:
247:
246:
245:
244:
240:
236:
233:
228:
227:
218:
215:
214:
207:
203:
202:
201:
198:
197:
190:
185:
181:
180:
179:
178:
174:
170:
166:
162:
158:
157:
154:
153:
146:
142:
138:
134:
122:
119:
117:
114:
112:
109:
108:
107:
106:
101:
96:
93:
88:
87:
83:
78:
76:
70:
69:
66:
63:
60:
58:
55:
51:
44:
42:
37:
32:
27:
26:
19:
1623:
1620:
1605:
1600:
1586:
1558:
1553:
1534:
1512:
1498:
1493:
1469:
1451:
1446:
1431:
1410:
1392:
1387:
1379:
1363:
1338:
1337:
1315:
1305:
1302:as follows:
1299:
1298:
1297:
1279:
1266:
1249:
1241:
1217:
1216:
1204:
1196:
1177:
1176:
1154:
1146:
1133:
1116:
1057:
925:
920:
915:
906:
900:
895:
890:
885:
879:
874:
869:
864:
849:
848:
836:
814:
813:
793:
775:
758:
741:
733:
711:
703:
688:
679:
672:
663:
643:
621:
615:
614:
591:
590:
586:
574:
549:
541:
540:
524:
498:
458:
450:
446:
420:
399:
395:
391:
380:
361:
347:
338:
319:humanitarian
268:
259:
231:
229:
225:
223:
209:
192:
160:
159:
148:
129:
116:Citation bot
84:
72:
49:
47:
35:
28:
1441:/ˈkævərʃəm/
1079:User:Sasata
928:User:Sasata
315:egalitarian
137:peer review
931:myself if
387:identical.
339:a total of
297:indigenous
1424:Faversham
1403:Faversham
1343:Jappalang
1324:Jappalang
1222:Peripatus
1199:, BTW ;)
1182:Finetooth
1083:Finetooth
1032:Finetooth
1002:Finetooth
938:Finetooth
909:pediments
707:deadlinks
694:cite news
392:Peripatus
362:which was
293:Peripatus
1583:Grutness
1509:Grutness
1466:Grutness
1407:Grutness
1360:Grutness
1263:Grutness
1246:Grutness
1218:Comments
1201:Grutness
1151:Grutness
1130:Grutness
1113:Grutness
1054:Grutness
1047:thanks!)
850:Comments
833:Grutness
818:Dabomb87
790:Grutness
772:Grutness
755:Grutness
738:Grutness
721:Ealdgyth
664:Comments
640:Grutness
571:Grutness
521:Grutness
495:Grutness
455:Grutness
332:within ?
206:Grutness
189:Grutness
145:Grutness
111:Analysis
75:Grutness
54:Karanacs
50:promoted
1380:Comment
1285:gadfium
1280:support
1231:gadfium
1226:endemic
1178:Support
1147:totally
973:though.
935:agrees.
587:support
542:Comment
400:species
301:endemic
253:others?
232:Support
161:Comment
103:Toolbox
1486:IPA-en
1261:Done.
1197:ersham
1109:WP:CIT
1027:WP:CIT
1018:WP:CIT
998:WP:CIT
989:WP:CIT
984:WP:CIT
481:Sasata
424:Sasata
402:ain't.
370:period
348:people
269:simply
260:simply
235:Sasata
184:WP:CIT
169:Sasata
1339:Other
630:garra
558:garra
396:genus
299:than
16:<
1589:wha?
1515:wha?
1472:wha?
1413:wha?
1366:wha?
1347:talk
1328:talk
1269:wha?
1252:wha?
1207:wha?
1186:talk
1157:wha?
1136:wha?
1119:wha?
1087:talk
1060:wha?
1036:talk
1006:talk
942:talk
839:wha?
822:talk
796:wha?
778:wha?
761:wha?
744:wha?
725:Talk
646:wha?
627:Gnan
577:wha?
555:Gnan
527:wha?
501:wha?
485:talk
461:wha?
428:talk
381:most
317:and
250:lede
248:The
239:talk
212:wha?
195:wha?
173:talk
151:wha?
81:wha?
1585:...
1551:? +
1511:...
1468:...
1409:...
1405::)
1362:...
1265:...
1248:...
1203:...
1153:...
1132:...
1115:...
1056:...
835:...
792:...
774:...
757:...
740:...
642:...
573:...
523:...
497:...
457:...
208:...
191:...
147:...
77:...
52:by
1606:gr
1601:An
1575:}}
1569:{{
1559:gr
1554:An
1549:}}
1543:{{
1537:.
1499:gr
1494:An
1489:}}
1483:{{
1452:gr
1447:An
1393:gr
1388:An
1349:)
1330:)
1188:)
1089:)
1038:)
1008:)
944:)
856:.
824:)
723:-
697:}}
691:{{
611:}}
605:{{
487:)
430:)
241:)
175:)
59:.
33:.
1437:,
1345:(
1326:(
1184:(
1085:(
1034:(
1004:(
940:(
911:?
820:(
666:-
483:(
426:(
350:.
237:(
171:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.