954:
seems to get referenced by other reliable sources, which is a good sign. It's only used here as a source for a review, so I think this is OK. However, you use three reviews (12-14 in this list) to support the first three sentences of the "Themes" section. I think you could regard the A.V Club piece as sufficiently in-depth for this purpose, but the other two pieces are a bit flimsy to be used in this way. I would suggest dropping this paragraph of "Themes"; you might be able to move some material to the "Responses" section, though you already have some of the material there as well.
1088:
matriarchies as termite social structures is retrogressive because it makes female power hierarchies appear alien and unnatural; and that "A Canterlot
Wedding" could be seen as retrogressive because these elements are both present. Fletcher then argues that the aria makes it clear the show is aware of the stereotype that women "can't have it all", but because the singer of the aria is evil the show also implicitly criticizes the idea that women can be powerful. (You're only citing p. 30 but this argument runs over into p. 31.)
930:
they would appeal to all audiences." Busis says the show is "ambitious, absorbing, and thoroughly entertaining" and
Hinckley says "charming and surprisingly complex". I think "appeal to all audiences" is a bit of a stretch, though both sources imply the appeal goes beyond the original target audience. I think you should pull this back a little; I wouldn't name Busis or Hinckley inline, unless they're well-known journalists. How about "Review in the New York
1079:"Hasbro felt that Dart's design was not intimidating enough, so Dart reared the character upwards and made her more upright to appear more commanding": I've copyedited this a little from what you had, but I have a question -- what's the difference between rearing the character upwards and making her more upright? Could we combine these by saying "so Dart gave the character a more upright stance to make her appear more commanding"?
737:"VanDerWerff stated Twilight's anger at Shining Armor for not informing her about his wedding sooner is "a great example" of the way children, while working towards their futures as adults, cannot completely understand their elders' activities"." The quotation mark after "activities" is misplaced or incomplete but because it does not have a beginning or ending depending on what it is supposed to be.
106:", cough), critics still think it's awesome and scholars think it discusses feminism. This article was brought to GA-status back in 2012 and I have since expanded its reception and production sections. I nominated it for FA status back in October of last year, but that was archived after over two weeks of absolutely no comments. All constructive feedback is welcome. Thanks!
970:
1318:"implores Twilight and her friends to recover the Elements of Harmony to stop the Changelings. However, they are captured. As Chrysalis celebrates her victory, Twilight frees Cadance". "Twilight frees Cadance", but you have just said "Twilight and her friends ... are captured." So how can Twilight free anyone?
1209:
Added sources; replaced
William and Kate image (though there don't seem to be many high-quality images of their wedding). Can you specify what you mean by "so-so" for the ALT text (like, is it clunky or not descriptive enough or something)? I'm having a hard time figuring out what to fix... And which
1087:
The way you're using
Fletcher's "retrogressive" comments doesn't jibe with my reading of that paragraph. I think his point is that evil queens are a Disney stereotype that is retrogressive because it makes a powerful female character the source of evil; and that Russ's assertion that sf often treats
953:
14. The A.V. Club. Suggest linking also to his author page on avclub.com to explain the name change from Emily St. James, since you link to a WP article under his current name. I'm not expert on this site but I know it's treated as reliable by WP:ALBUMS, and looking through their old discussions it
919:
9. Press release. Primary source; this is used twice. The first time is to cover the publicity campaign; I think the press release is only a marginal source for that. If another media outlet found the campaign worth mentioning, e.g. as a sign of the popularity of the show, then OK -- and in fact
405:
When combining comments from multiple critics, I'm not sure if you can use quotes without individual attribution. Also, in lines like "The episodes' music also garnered critical praise, having been called "one of the best things about this show" and "just breathtaking".", the two quoted critics are
988:
19. A.V. Club. This is used to source "As of
November 2013, it has drawn the most viewers of any program on The Hub"; the source says "The two-part “Canterlot Wedding” drew the most viewers of any Hub program". I don't think the source is inherently unreliable, but this is vague -- the most that
929:
10. Entertainment Weekly coverage of the wedding announcement in the NYT. Reliable, and no problem at first use. The second use is to source "The New York Daily News' David
Hinckley and Entertainment Weekly's Hillary Busis found the episodes ambitious, complex, captivating, and enjoyable, saying
1006:
That's it for the sources. I'll add more comments once you've responded. I would also say that I think the plot should be trimmed -- it's over 600 words, and the rest of the body of the article is only about 1000 words, and that's before any cuts you might make as a result of my comments above.
867:
I see above that
Guerillero had concerns about the sources, and that you've responded by trimming some primary sources. The plot, which of course is taken from the primary source, is about a third of the article, so I immediately wonder if there's enough here for an article, or if perhaps this
303:
There are many notable narrative and thematic continuities between My Little Pony 'n
Friends and MLPFIM, and episodes of the recent series parallel the female-centered nature of the original. ... "A Canterlot Wedding: Part 2" culminates in a battle with a changeling army assuming the uncanny
699:"This included a microsite with games and story-themed digital content, and previews of the episode were posted on social media, including The Hub's pages on Twitter and Facebook." Isn't what you have on Twitter an "account" instead of "page"? For Facebook, "page" is correct though.
895:
4. A post on
DeviantArt. This is pretty hard to validate. First you have to be able to show that this poster is Lauren Faust, then it has to be clear that this is the episode she's talking about, and if that's resolved this is no better than a blog post. I would cut this.
657:"'A Canterlot Wedding' is the title of the twenty-fifth and twenty-sixth episodes of the second season of the animated television series My Little Pony: Friendship Is Magic, which are the fifty-first and fifty-second episodes overall." This is a bit long for
1419:
In all seriousness though, since
Shining Armour (nope, I'm not going to use the American spelling, because I don't want to) is linked and his link goes to the same place Cadance's does, so it's a duplink, right? And now I've unlinked Cadance in the
269:
I'm still not sure it's a "high quality" source per FAC criteria. Since it's the only such source, I could be ok with it in the body, but I don't think it's due weight to use it for the lead ("she worked on the story's inception").
668:
How about ending the first sentence at the mention of the show and starting a new one with something like "The fifty-first and fifty-second episodes overall, they were directed by..."? Wording may vary depending on what's best.
1189:
Source for "It has also been praised by multiple reviewers and will show the reader how the fight was "colourful and fun" as well as Pinkie Pie's usage of Twilight as a gun so they are not left questioning what it was. "? Also
652:
Maybe you can leave comments on other FACs to possibly attract reviewers. Or perhaps leave a message on some users' talk who are familiar with this show (or at least television work in general). Anyway, let's do the honors:
1510:
905:
5. An interview with Entertainment Weekly. Reliable; he only references it as "the aria" in season two. You presumably know he has to be referring to this, but I don't; can you cite something that demonstrates this?
385:"commended the episodes' ambition, complexity, captivation, and enjoyability" – captivation feels out of place. (Perhaps "commended the episodes' ambition and complexity, finding them enjoyable and captivating".)
364:
I think it's the viewership of the original airing, not anything after, like re-runs, etc. I don't think it should be "was" because that, at least to me, implies something surpassed it, which is unconfirmed...
126:
The article relies on primary sources such as blog posts from the creator, press releases, and the website of the DVD distributor instead of secondary sources. The NY Daily News is a questionable source.
162:
I've tried to reduce the reliance on primary sources. Right now, we're at four PR cites; one blog post cite; and one DVD distributor site cite. I'm still unsure if it is sufficient, though. Per RSP,
836:
433:, "It is preferable not to clutter articles with information best left to the references. Interested readers can click on the ref to find out the publishing journal"? IDK if this applies, though...
1048:
Your changes look good; this passes source review. I added a chapter page range for Fletcher but otherwise the formatting looks fine. I'll read through again and do a content review shortly.
665:" is followed by the mention of the show (which is singular), making it sound almost grammatically incorrect. Also, the two mentions of the number of episode make it a little confusing read.
284:"compared the plot twist to those of the science-fiction television series Fringe" – needs a bit more context to justify why this is in Themes. (The source talks about the plot's darkness.)
938:
described the show as "charming and surprisingly complex", and "ambitious, absorbing, and thoroughly entertaining", which avoids paraphrasing issues and can't be accused of synthesis.
1417:
Why do people keep asking questions like "Why is this like that" or "Why isn't this like that"? Am I just meant to say "Oh, I dunno, I've done that now" if it's a silly mistake?
395:"The Friendship Is Magic fandom initially chastised..." – reading this sentence, it sounds like they chastised this episode but later changed their minds. Needs clarification.
949:
12. Daily News. Not a great source but this is a review so we're just sourcing the reviewer's opinion, and it's OK for that. OK for the uses you make of it, but see 14 below.
361:
Unless I'm mistaken, the source is taking about viewership until 2013, not after 2013. How about the simpler "As of November 2013, it was the most viewed program on the Hub"?
691:"As pressure from the ceremony mounts, Twilight's friends dismiss Twilight's claims." Why not "As pressure from the ceremony mounts, Twilight's friends dismiss her claims."?
418:
Some more occurrences: "surprisingly complex"; the "biggest, most expensive, action-packed ... episode ever"; the "bouncy and fun, filled with real joy and heart" wedding
337:"triple-digit and quadruple-digit year-to-year delivery gains" – without further context, it's unclear why both of these are mentioned (rather than just quadruple-digit).
745:"He likened Chrysalis's retrogression to evil Disney queens and noted; "matriarchal.." - I think a colon or a comma is more suitable than the semi-colon after "noted".
310:
I assumed it was something MLP-related, but I guess not. This is the only other scholarly source I could find, so I think the article is comprehensive in that sense.
1224:"So-so" means that they are super long and seem to be describing the image's content rather than serving as a replacement of the image for those who can't see it.
327:"A Canterlot Wedding" in quotes is a bit confusing when interspersed with quotes from sources (in Themes); suggest replacing some occurrences with "the episodes".
947:
11. Yahoo News. Reliable. OK for the bridle shower coverage, though I'd remove material from those two sentences that can only be sourced to the press release.
307:
and I have barely any idea what this means. I've googled "substitution of a mechanical double" but there's nothing that I can find that provides more context...
246:
Suggest adding context to character names when first mentioned in the plot. (E.g. "the unicorn Twilight Strong", "Princess Celestia, the ruler of Canterlot").
40:
917:
7 & 8. Begin's book on the art of the show. Used to source descriptions of the development of the character art; I think it's a reliable source for that.
412:
I meant that quotes like "one of the best things about this show" should be attributed by name to the specific critic (or magazine) who made that statement.
525:(i.e. anything under a level-3 header or less) are discouraged, not short sections. I don't think the section would fit anywhere else in the article either.
920:
the second time you use this source you do have another source, and I think it's OK for that. I think you should consider cutting the first use of this.
887:
375:"considering it to be one of the reasons she felt Friendship Is Magic was one of the best children's programs" – the "one of"s feel a bit repetitive.
304:
appearance of the six main characters, representing the "substitution of a mechanical double," a theme humorously revisited in "Too Many Pinkie Pies."
1002:
23 & 24. Wired and the DVD distributor; the first is reliable and the second I think is OK given that all it sources is what's in the boxed set.
294:
1521:
30:
17:
989:
week? The most ever to that date? Given that you have (claimed) numbers from the press release just before this, I think I would cut this.
977:
17. Entertainment Weekly. Just used to source the statement that multiple outlets mentioned the William & Kate connection. No problem.
1532:
1408:
Well, if you're a brony you'd/you'll probably understand why... but a lot of the appeal of this show also comes from childhood nostalgia...
1256:
Seems better, I think. This passes on licence and use review, but if anyone else has objections to the ALT text they should be considered.
1175:
1130:
1061:
1020:
472:
if the quotation is an opinion" (italics in original). Re. two quotes from Daily News, you may want to re-arrange to make it less messy.
1171:
1126:
1057:
1016:
1558:
1503:
1484:
1466:
1387:
1373:
1355:
1265:
1251:
1233:
1219:
1203:
1179:
1153:
1134:
1065:
1043:
1024:
857:
830:
811:
643:
630:
605:
587:
573:
554:
503:
481:
448:
230:
204:
193:
175:
157:
133:
115:
90:
1191:
878:
1. Primary source, just used to identify the character by name. Doesn't seem like there's any doubt about it; I think this is OK.
679:"'A Canterlot Wedding' was series developer Lauren Faust's final involvement in the show. She was involved.." - usage of
330:
I've replaced the second instance as the first doesn't seem like that much of a problem. IDK about "This Day Aria" though
1547:
1310:"and explains the apparent reasons for Cadance's behavior." Er, is there a reason why you don't tell us what these are?
297:(pdf link on the right) mentions a thematic connection to an earlier MLP episode in p. 11; could be interesting to add.
146:
236:
Lead: "Additionally, the episodes have been subject to feminist analysis" – I think this needs a bit of elaboration.
979:
18. Press release. I would change the statements you use this for to say "claimed", since it's publicity material.
963:
15. Fletcher again; as above, would like to see the article if possible, but no doubt it's a reliable source.
1261:
1229:
1199:
1167:
1122:
1117:
I've copyedited; please revert anything you disagree with. I think this is now pretty close to FA quality.
1053:
1012:
639:
626:
583:
550:
477:
226:
1383:
1351:
900:
We can validate this (see above), but the comment she was replying to has been deleted, so I've removed it
620:
except 1c, where I'm neutral due to the DeviantArt citation. I'll wait to hear other reviewers' opinions.
317:
The quoted "princess stereotype" does not appear in the source. (Perhaps you meant "princess culture"?)
1162:. The "Themes" section could probably be smoothed out a little more, but I think we're over the line.
821:! I'be hopefully addressed them all. Let me know if I missed anything or you have any other issues.
1294:"She meets a cold and distant Cadance, however, who has no memory of". Suggest deleting "however".
723:
72:
1525:
532:
In some of the references, "publisher" should be changed to "work": Shout Factory, ComicBook.com.
430:
1257:
1239:
1225:
1195:
1163:
1141:
1118:
1049:
1031:
1008:
998:
20. Entertainment Weekly, quoting a fansite founder about fandom's opinion; OK for how it's used.
635:
622:
593:
579:
561:
546:
487:
473:
436:
422:
222:
1480:
1379:
1369:
1361:
1347:
1247:
1215:
1149:
1039:
826:
601:
569:
499:
444:
406:
actually mentioned by name later. Suggest either summarizing these statements or attributing.
189:
171:
111:
86:
1543:
1499:
1462:
882:
3. Academic article by Fletcher. Looks fine; would you be able to email me a copy of this?
853:
807:
142:
61:
351:
199:
181:
128:
264:
1524:
has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see
835:
No problem. Thank you for addressing these. If possible, I would appreciate comments on
1105:
772:
762:
103:
354:, it is "used to express a past event that has present consequences" as opposed to "
1476:
1365:
1243:
1211:
1145:
1101:
1035:
822:
597:
565:
495:
440:
185:
167:
138:
107:
82:
910:
Well, there's only one aria in season two, but no source discusses this so removed
1552:
1539:
1495:
1472:
1458:
951:
13. Commonsensemedia. Used for a review, which is no problem, but see 14 below.
849:
818:
803:
151:
57:
53:
965:
16. Valiente & Rasmussen. Reliable source; would like a copy if possible.
102:
episode. Though it may not be thought to discuss Stalinism or Marxism (cough, "
355:
871:
I'll go through the sources and list them here with any concerns. I'm using
658:
465:
425:: Ooo, I think this one gets a bit messy, because there are two quotes from
791:
515:
1327:
1097:
1286:"further cheering up Twilight." What has previously cheered Twilight?
347:"As of November 2013, it has drawn" – should probably be "had drawn".
839:
although I totally understand if you don't have the time or interest.
722:"New York Daily News' David Hinckley compared" - shouldn't it be The
39:
Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in
1494:, nothing else to quibble about and a really nice article overall.
356:
an action that occurred prior to an aforementioned time in the past
514:
Short sections such as "Home media release" are discouraged per
300:
I can't really find anything significant to add... it just says:
634:
Updating to full support now that DeviantArt has been removed.
184:. Could you tell me what you think of the sources now? Thanks.
1449:"surprisingly complex", and "ambitious" → Comma unnecessary.
1425:"Unicorn Twilight Sparkle" → "The unicorn Twilight Sparkle"?
518:. Suggest merging to one of the others (perhaps Production).
1441:"during season one, and as consulting" → Comma unnecessary.
1401:
And I continue to be amazed by the depth of our coverage on
1096:
I think you need to define "alicorn" somewhere. I see that
256:
I don't think a comment on DeviantArt is a high-quality RS.
1457:
Nice work on this, only found a couple very minor issues.
259:
The comment is from the show's creator, Lauren Faust, and
875:, just to be be clear what footnote numbering I'm using.
350:
Not a grammar guru but I think it's correct as, per the
1242:: trimmed. I'm not sure if it is sufficient, though...
1000:
21. & 22. SF Weekly; used for review coverage. OK.
872:
65:
1302:"Twilight's friends dismiss her claims". What claims?
221:
Placeholder; I'll take a look in the next day or two.
198:
I will stand aside. I'm still not thrilled about it --
1433:
Perhaps link Ponyville in the body at first mention?
702:
Fixed (assuming you also have an account on FaceBook)
1144:: Responded to your comments; sorry for the delay.
868:material should be included in the season article.
1194:is a pretty low quality image. ALT text is so-so.
166:is a reliable source, and it is used for opinion.
1566:The above discussion is preserved as an archive.
1108:instead, or even put a gloss or footnote inline.
1034:. I've hopefully resolved your comments. Thanks!
539:. I don't think Shout! Factory is a work, though.
886:I... don't know how to email images, but here's
564:! I've hopefully responded to them all. Thanks!
41:Knowledge (XXG) talk:Featured article candidates
1413:Why isn't Princess Cadance linked in the lead?
757:"It was viewed by 475,000 people aged 2" -: -->
43:. No further edits should be made to this page.
1572:No further edits should be made to this page.
1538:template in place on the talk page until the
29:The following is an archived discussion of a
8:
740:Huh, I don't know how that got there. Fixed.
18:Knowledge (XXG):Featured article candidates
1509:Absolutely not necessary, but a review at
915:6. Entertainment Weekly; this is reliable.
880:2. Same as above, for the same reason; OK.
1091:Revised; let me know if it is sufficient
545:That's it from me; interesting episode.
490:: I've removed it, given it doesn't add
863:Source review from Mike Christie - Pass
1330:at first mention in the main article.
521:If I'm reading this correctly, short
7:
578:Couple of remaining comments above.
263:confirms that it is Faust's account
713:True, but in this case it's a page.
100:My Little Pony: Friendship Is Magic
464:I think the relevant guideline is
24:
1192:File:William and Kate wedding.jpg
1074:Content review from Mike Christie
1364:: Responded to your comments :)
141:any response to this comment? (
1104:, so I would link directly to
1:
1559:20:13, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
1504:15:46, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
1485:14:47, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
1467:13:20, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
1388:11:47, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
1374:09:21, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
1356:19:20, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
1266:11:08, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
1252:03:51, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
1234:14:07, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
1220:14:00, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
1204:10:34, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
1180:14:37, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
1154:14:04, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
644:16:46, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
560:Thank you for your comments,
1135:12:04, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
1066:12:04, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
1044:05:58, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
1025:02:26, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
858:16:25, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
831:14:55, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
812:14:01, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
631:18:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
606:13:33, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
596:: Responded to the above :)
588:08:42, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
574:02:53, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
555:20:07, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
504:09:26, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
482:05:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
468:: "The source must be named
449:05:12, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
231:19:25, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
205:13:44, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
194:03:47, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
176:05:06, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
158:03:40, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
134:22:12, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
116:12:56, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
91:12:56, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
1533:featured article candidates
1338:What is "Flash animation"?
31:featured article nomination
1589:
817:Thanks for your comments,
1278:Support from Gog the Mild
758:"It was viewed by 475,000
1569:Please do not modify it.
98:This article is about a
36:Please do not modify it.
1475:: Hopefully, all done.
1378:Nice work. Supporting.
748:I put that; hopefully,
802:That's it. Nice work.
306:
1513:would be appreciated.
694:Honestly, IDK. Fixed.
466:MOS:Quote#Attribution
301:
1282:Recusing to review.
983:Added "according to"
936:Entertainment Weekly
683:in close proximity.
1185:Image review - Pass
73:A Canterlot Wedding
64:) 24 February 2022
648:Comments by FrB.TG
1514:
1418:
661:. And the "which
451:
217:Comments from O-D
180:Courtesy ping to
94:
1580:
1571:
1555:
1537:
1531:
1528:, and leave the
1508:
1416:
777:
771:
767:
761:
752:fixes the issue.
618:on all criteria
434:
202:
154:
131:
79:
48:The article was
38:
1588:
1587:
1583:
1582:
1581:
1579:
1578:
1577:
1576:
1567:
1553:
1542:goes through. (
1535:
1529:
1313:Uh... no. Added
1280:
1187:
1076:
865:
775:
769:
765:
759:
650:
470:in article text
429:. I guess, per
219:
200:
152:
129:
76:
34:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1586:
1584:
1575:
1574:
1562:
1561:
1515:
1506:
1489:
1488:
1487:
1455:
1454:
1453:
1447:
1446:
1445:
1439:
1438:
1437:
1431:
1430:
1429:
1423:
1422:
1421:
1411:
1410:
1409:
1403:My Little Pony
1398:
1397:
1393:
1392:
1391:
1390:
1345:
1344:
1343:
1342:
1336:
1335:
1334:
1324:
1323:
1322:
1316:
1315:
1314:
1308:
1307:
1306:
1300:
1299:
1298:
1292:
1291:
1290:
1279:
1276:
1275:
1274:
1273:
1272:
1271:
1270:
1269:
1268:
1186:
1183:
1157:
1156:
1115:
1114:
1113:
1112:
1106:winged unicorn
1094:
1093:
1092:
1085:
1084:
1083:
1075:
1072:
1071:
1070:
1069:
1068:
1003:
1001:
999:
996:
995:
994:
986:
985:
984:
978:
975:
974:
973:
964:
961:
960:
959:
952:
950:
948:
945:
944:
943:
927:
926:
925:
918:
916:
913:
912:
911:
903:
902:
901:
893:
892:
891:
881:
879:
864:
861:
843:
842:
841:
840:
800:
799:
798:
797:
784:
783:
782:
755:
754:
753:
743:
742:
741:
735:
734:
733:
719:
718:
717:
716:
715:
714:
706:
705:
704:
703:
697:
696:
695:
689:
688:
687:
677:
676:
675:
674:
673:
649:
646:
613:
612:
611:
610:
609:
608:
543:
542:
541:
540:
529:
528:
527:
526:
511:
510:
509:
508:
507:
506:
461:
460:
459:
458:
457:
456:
455:
454:
453:
452:
402:
401:
400:
399:
392:
391:
390:
389:
382:
381:
380:
379:
372:
371:
370:
369:
368:
367:
366:
365:
344:
343:
342:
341:
334:
333:
332:
331:
324:
323:
322:
321:
315:
314:
313:
312:
311:
291:
290:
289:
288:
281:
280:
279:
278:
277:
276:
275:
274:
253:
252:
251:
250:
243:
242:
241:
240:
218:
215:
214:
213:
212:
211:
210:
209:
208:
207:
178:
96:
95:
81:Nominator(s):
75:
70:
69:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1585:
1573:
1570:
1564:
1563:
1560:
1557:
1556:
1549:
1545:
1541:
1534:
1527:
1523:
1519:
1516:
1512:
1507:
1505:
1501:
1497:
1493:
1490:
1486:
1482:
1478:
1474:
1470:
1469:
1468:
1464:
1460:
1456:
1451:
1450:
1448:
1443:
1442:
1440:
1435:
1434:
1432:
1427:
1426:
1424:
1415:
1414:
1412:
1407:
1406:
1404:
1400:
1399:
1395:
1394:
1389:
1385:
1381:
1377:
1376:
1375:
1371:
1367:
1363:
1360:
1359:
1358:
1357:
1353:
1349:
1340:
1339:
1337:
1332:
1331:
1329:
1325:
1320:
1319:
1317:
1312:
1311:
1309:
1304:
1303:
1301:
1296:
1295:
1293:
1288:
1287:
1285:
1284:
1283:
1277:
1267:
1263:
1259:
1258:Jo-Jo Eumerus
1255:
1254:
1253:
1249:
1245:
1241:
1240:Jo-Jo Eumerus
1237:
1236:
1235:
1231:
1227:
1226:Jo-Jo Eumerus
1223:
1222:
1221:
1217:
1213:
1208:
1207:
1206:
1205:
1201:
1197:
1196:Jo-Jo Eumerus
1193:
1184:
1182:
1181:
1177:
1173:
1169:
1165:
1164:Mike Christie
1161:
1155:
1151:
1147:
1143:
1142:Mike Christie
1139:
1138:
1137:
1136:
1132:
1128:
1124:
1120:
1119:Mike Christie
1110:
1109:
1107:
1103:
1100:takes you to
1099:
1095:
1090:
1089:
1086:
1081:
1080:
1078:
1077:
1073:
1067:
1063:
1059:
1055:
1051:
1050:Mike Christie
1047:
1046:
1045:
1041:
1037:
1033:
1032:Mike Christie
1029:
1028:
1027:
1026:
1022:
1018:
1014:
1010:
1009:Mike Christie
1004:
992:
991:
990:
982:
981:
980:
972:
968:
967:
966:
957:
956:
955:
941:
940:
939:
937:
933:
923:
922:
921:
909:
908:
907:
899:
898:
897:
889:
885:
884:
883:
876:
874:
869:
862:
860:
859:
855:
851:
847:
838:
834:
833:
832:
828:
824:
820:
816:
815:
814:
813:
809:
805:
795:
794:
793:
789:
788:November 2013
785:
780:
779:
774:
764:
756:
751:
747:
746:
744:
739:
738:
736:
731:
730:
728:
727:
721:
720:
712:
711:
710:
709:
708:
707:
701:
700:
698:
693:
692:
690:
685:
684:
682:
678:
671:
670:
667:
666:
664:
660:
656:
655:
654:
647:
645:
641:
637:
636:Olivaw-Daneel
633:
632:
628:
624:
623:Olivaw-Daneel
621:
617:
607:
603:
599:
595:
594:Olivaw-Daneel
591:
590:
589:
585:
581:
580:Olivaw-Daneel
577:
576:
575:
571:
567:
563:
562:Olivaw-Daneel
559:
558:
557:
556:
552:
548:
547:Olivaw-Daneel
538:
537:ComicBook.com
534:
533:
531:
530:
524:
520:
519:
517:
513:
512:
505:
501:
497:
493:
489:
488:Olivaw-Daneel
485:
484:
483:
479:
475:
474:Olivaw-Daneel
471:
467:
463:
462:
450:
446:
442:
438:
437:Olivaw-Daneel
432:
428:
424:
423:Olivaw-Daneel
420:
419:
417:
416:
414:
413:
411:
410:
408:
407:
404:
403:
397:
396:
394:
393:
387:
386:
384:
383:
377:
376:
374:
373:
363:
362:
360:
359:
357:
353:
349:
348:
346:
345:
339:
338:
336:
335:
329:
328:
326:
325:
319:
318:
316:
309:
308:
305:
299:
298:
296:
293:
292:
286:
285:
283:
282:
272:
271:
268:
267:
266:
262:
258:
257:
255:
254:
248:
247:
245:
244:
238:
237:
235:
234:
233:
232:
228:
224:
223:Olivaw-Daneel
216:
206:
203:
197:
196:
195:
191:
187:
183:
179:
177:
173:
169:
165:
164:NY Daily News
161:
160:
159:
156:
155:
148:
144:
140:
137:
136:
135:
132:
125:
124:
120:
119:
118:
117:
113:
109:
105:
104:The Cutie Map
101:
93:
92:
88:
84:
78:
77:
74:
71:
68:
66:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
37:
32:
27:
26:
19:
1568:
1565:
1551:
1518:Closing note
1517:
1491:
1402:
1380:Gog the Mild
1362:Gog the Mild
1348:Gog the Mild
1346:
1281:
1188:
1159:
1158:
1116:
1102:unicorn horn
1005:
997:
987:
976:
962:
946:
935:
931:
928:
914:
904:
894:
877:
873:this version
870:
866:
845:
844:
801:
787:
749:
725:
680:
662:
651:
619:
615:
614:
544:
536:
522:
491:
469:
426:
302:
260:
220:
163:
150:
122:
121:
99:
97:
80:
49:
47:
35:
28:
768:people aged
523:subsections
1305:Elaborated
1210:image(s)?
932:Daily News
848:on prose.
726:Daily News
427:Daily News
352:WP article
295:This paper
201:Guerillero
182:Guerillero
130:Guerillero
1526:WP:FAC/ar
1522:candidate
969:Here's a
724:New York
659:MOS:FIRST
435:Re-ping:
431:WP:INTEXT
1520:: This
1172:contribs
1127:contribs
1058:contribs
1017:contribs
971:PDF link
890:to a PDF
792:MOS:NBSP
516:MOS:PARA
415:Revised
409:Revised
239:Expanded
50:promoted
1492:Support
1477:Pamzeis
1366:Pamzeis
1328:The Hub
1321:Revised
1289:Revised
1244:Pamzeis
1212:Pamzeis
1176:library
1160:Support
1146:Pamzeis
1131:library
1098:alicorn
1062:library
1036:Pamzeis
1021:library
846:Support
823:Pamzeis
786:"As of
732:Revised
681:involve
672:Revised
616:Support
598:Pamzeis
566:Pamzeis
496:Pamzeis
441:Pamzeis
398:Revised
388:Revised
340:Revised
287:Removed
273:Removed
186:Pamzeis
168:Pamzeis
139:Pamzeis
108:Pamzeis
83:Pamzeis
1554:buidhe
1511:my FAC
1496:AryKun
1473:AryKun
1459:AryKun
1396:AryKun
1341:Linked
1111:Linked
888:a link
850:FrB.TG
837:my FAC
819:FrB.TG
804:FrB.TG
535:Fixed
494:much.
153:buidhe
123:Oppose
58:FACBot
54:Buidhe
1452:Fixed
1444:Fixed
1326:Link
958:Moved
796:Fixed
686:Fixed
378:Fixed
320:Fixed
261:Wired
249:Added
16:<
1500:talk
1481:talk
1463:talk
1436:Done
1428:Done
1420:body
1405:...
1384:talk
1370:talk
1352:talk
1333:Done
1297:Done
1262:talk
1248:talk
1230:talk
1216:talk
1200:talk
1168:talk
1150:talk
1123:talk
1082:Done
1054:talk
1040:talk
1030:Hi,
1013:talk
993:Done
942:Done
934:and
924:Done
854:talk
827:talk
808:talk
790:" -
781:Done
773:nbsp
763:nbsp
750:that
640:talk
627:talk
602:talk
584:talk
570:talk
551:talk
500:talk
492:that
478:talk
445:talk
265:here
227:talk
190:talk
172:talk
112:talk
87:talk
62:talk
56:via
1540:bot
1174:-
1129:-
1060:-
1019:-
778:2"
729:'?
663:are
52:by
1550:)
1546:·
1536:}}
1530:{{
1502:)
1483:)
1465:)
1386:)
1372:)
1354:)
1264:)
1250:)
1232:)
1218:)
1202:)
1178:)
1170:-
1152:)
1133:)
1125:-
1064:)
1056:-
1042:)
1023:)
1015:-
856:)
829:)
810:)
776:}}
770:{{
766:}}
760:{{
642:)
629:)
604:)
586:)
572:)
553:)
502:)
480:)
447:)
439:.
358:"
229:)
192:)
174:)
149:)
145:·
127:--
114:)
89:)
67:.
33:.
1548:c
1544:t
1498:(
1479:(
1471:@
1461:(
1382:(
1368:(
1350:(
1260:(
1246:(
1238:@
1228:(
1214:(
1198:(
1166:(
1148:(
1140:@
1121:(
1052:(
1038:(
1011:(
852:(
825:(
806:(
638:(
625:(
600:(
592:@
582:(
568:(
549:(
498:(
486:@
476:(
443:(
421:@
225:(
188:(
170:(
147:c
143:t
110:(
85:(
60:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.