118:: No matter what the campaign is referred to in Britain, Ireland, France, Turkey, Newfoundland, Australia, New Zealand, India or Nepal (some of the forces of which participated), in NONE of these is it referred to as the 'Battle of Gallipoli'. Even the Turkish name does not translate as 'battle'.
58:- no references, the lead section is a little too short, and the "Aftermath" section, with a bullet point list of "What if..."s, seems out of place. Otherwise a comprehensive and well-written article.
33:
This is an well-written article on one of the most important battles in WWI, and marked turning points in
Australian, British and Turkish history.
17:
98:: A potentially excellent article on a subject of great significance, However, it still needs work, and should probably be referred to
137:
110:
88:
75:
50:
37:
133:
121:
107:
129:
86:
71:
64:
27:
125:
47:
103:
81:
59:
34:
46:
References? If references are added, I'm likely to support.
8:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Featured article candidates
7:
80:Object for same reasons as above --
24:
1:
155:
138:10:09, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
111:13:36, 30 July 2005 (UTC)
89:00:28, 28 July 2005 (UTC)
76:19:07, 24 July 2005 (UTC)
51:12:06, 24 July 2005 (UTC)
38:11:03, 24 July 2005 (UTC)
28:Battle of Gallipoli
140:
124:comment added by
74:
146:
119:
84:
68:
63:
154:
153:
149:
148:
147:
145:
144:
143:
82:
66:
31:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
152:
150:
142:
141:
113:
93:
92:
91:
53:
30:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
151:
139:
135:
131:
127:
123:
117:
114:
112:
109:
105:
101:
97:
94:
90:
87:
85:
79:
78:
77:
73:
69:
61:
57:
54:
52:
49:
48:WegianWarrior
45:
42:
41:
40:
39:
36:
29:
26:
19:
115:
99:
95:
55:
43:
32:
120:—Preceding
104:Cyberjunkie
100:peer review
83:ZeWrestler
60:Flcelloguy
35:edgeworth
134:contribs
122:unsigned
126:Hayaman
44:Comment
116:Object
96:Object
67:note?
56:Object
72:Desk
16:<
130:talk
108:Talk
102:.--
136:)
132:•
106:|
70:|
65:A
128:(
62:|
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.