Knowledge

:Featured article candidates/Battle of Gonzales/archive1 - Knowledge

Source đź“ť

515:— Interesting article. However, in the lead, for the sentence "Although the soldiers neared Gonzales on September 29, colonists used a variety of excuses to keep them from the town, while secretly sending messengers to request assistance from nearby communities." The word "Although" doesn't seem quite right. "Although" means "in spite of" and the people of Gonzales weren't mounting a resistance "in spite of" the soldiers arrival, but "because of it". Again, unusual and interesting article. 481:— In relation to 1c/2c: No journal articles have been published in the last 20 years of note according to Scholar, the material is secondary and appears to reflect the depth of Scholarship available. In relation to 2c: fn2, 20, 30, 33, 34 lack terminal full-stops in the citations (required to match other footnote citations in style). This appears to be due to a mixture of manual short citations, and automatic long citations. 173:
This "battle" was fought over a cannon "good for little more than starting horse races". One side took time out from firing their weapons to eat watermelon. The other side were under orders not to fight and went home. That didn't stop the watermelon eaters from declaring victory. 175 years later,
459:
Thanks. I chose not to include the flags because the Come and Take It flag was used by this group of Texans as a taunt at the end of the events, it did not necessarily represent all of Texas. At the time, Texas was still part of Mexico and there was no consensus within the region (or even among
311:
Actually, in going back to look at the article I realized that this is a pretty common citation style (the APA endorses state abbreviations, and I think that is also the case for the MLA). Can you point me to the appropriate MOS page so I can check it out? Thanks!
495:
I think the article is internally consistent - short citations with only author name, date, and page number end with a full-stop. Full citations of websites and full citations of books do not end with a full stop. Thanks for looking over the article.
557:
I never tire of reading these famous skirmishes. Being an adopted son of Texas I do seem to recall the history books stating that the Mexican troops were driven out, but I do agree that this needs a cite to stay in the article.
174:
we're still arguing about what happened to the cannon. Because the battle was so tiny, it's discussed mainly in relation to the Texas Revolution as a whole, so the article relies heavily on broader scholarly works.
117: 588:
Karanacs asked me to pop in, and to my eyes the images are all well-documented, with source, author, and date info and demonstrably public domain/free use. Passes crit. 3.
40: 529:
I think the intended contradiction is that the soldiers came close to Gonzales, but did not reach the town (because of the "variety of excuses").
415:- Good work. Is there a reason why this sentence - "By the end of the year, the Texians had driven all Mexican troops from Texas." - isn't cited? 88: 83: 92: 30: 17: 75: 608: 594: 581: 567: 545: 533: 524: 505: 490: 469: 454: 435: 424: 403: 383: 365: 348: 321: 306: 290: 266: 250: 236: 219: 201: 183: 165: 133: 572:
I still disagree with the need for the cite, but I've bowed to the Toms and added one. Thanks for looking at the article.
138: 379: 361: 542: 233: 371: 431:
That's one of those obvious facts that I didn't see the need to cite. It can be found in any of the books.
520: 79: 375: 357: 539: 450: 230: 445:- Nicely done, though perhaps include the flag used at the battle and the mexican flag in the infobox. 197: 563: 341: 285: 604: 577: 516: 501: 486: 465: 399: 394:
Thanks for the reminder, I had missed that one. I'll see what I can do about the map next week.
317: 302: 262: 216: 179: 161: 71: 64: 53: 589: 530: 446: 420: 247: 538:
It is perhaps very slightly jarring though, and it's easily changed anyway, as I've done.
193: 276:
nice article, one quibble is that in references TX should be spelt out as Texas, per MoS
559: 335: 278: 600: 573: 497: 482: 461: 432: 395: 313: 298: 258: 212: 175: 157: 109: 416: 257:
Thanks to all four of you for taking a look at the article - and so quickly!
460:
those involved in this dispute) as to whether Texas should secede.
39:
Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in
229:. Sounds like my kind of battle. I can't see much wrong with this. 211:- sources look okay, links checked out with the link checker tool. 297:
That's an MOS rule I didn't know. I'll take care of that.
143: 370:
But please note my comment on your talk page about the
118:
Featured article candidates/Battle of Gonzales/archive1
105: 101: 97: 57: 621:The above discussion is preserved as an archive. 43:. No further edits should be made to this page. 627:No further edits should be made to this page. 29:The following is an archived discussion of a 8: 356:- Good read. Interesting and well-written.-- 599:Thanks - I appreciate your taking a look! 122: 41:Knowledge talk:Featured article candidates 192:- no dab links, no dead external links. 125: 115: 18:Knowledge:Featured article candidates 7: 24: 333:- Concise, well-written article. 1: 609:21:44, 7 September 2010 (UTC) 595:21:09, 7 September 2010 (UTC) 582:15:01, 7 September 2010 (UTC) 568:13:49, 7 September 2010 (UTC) 546:17:59, 6 September 2010 (UTC) 534:17:56, 6 September 2010 (UTC) 525:17:54, 6 September 2010 (UTC) 506:15:01, 7 September 2010 (UTC) 491:06:01, 6 September 2010 (UTC) 470:15:01, 7 September 2010 (UTC) 455:19:54, 5 September 2010 (UTC) 436:01:22, 4 September 2010 (UTC) 425:22:56, 3 September 2010 (UTC) 404:21:06, 3 September 2010 (UTC) 384:20:33, 3 September 2010 (UTC) 366:19:56, 3 September 2010 (UTC) 349:19:11, 3 September 2010 (UTC) 322:21:15, 3 September 2010 (UTC) 307:21:06, 3 September 2010 (UTC) 291:18:33, 3 September 2010 (UTC) 267:20:26, 2 September 2010 (UTC) 251:18:40, 2 September 2010 (UTC) 237:17:29, 2 September 2010 (UTC) 220:16:32, 2 September 2010 (UTC) 202:15:59, 2 September 2010 (UTC) 184:15:56, 2 September 2010 (UTC) 166:15:56, 2 September 2010 (UTC) 31:featured article nomination 644: 591:Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs 624:Please do not modify it. 56:22:23, 9 September 2010 36:Please do not modify it. 372:Battle of Lipantitlán 274:Support and comment 72:Battle of Gonzales 65:Battle of Gonzales 376:William S. Saturn 358:William S. Saturn 169: 151: 150: 635: 626: 592: 346: 338: 288: 281: 246:. Looking good. 154: 123: 113: 95: 48:The article was 38: 643: 642: 638: 637: 636: 634: 633: 632: 631: 622: 590: 342: 336: 286: 279: 86: 70: 68: 34: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 641: 639: 630: 629: 616: 614: 613: 612: 611: 586: 585: 584: 552: 551: 550: 549: 548: 510: 509: 508: 475: 474: 473: 472: 439: 438: 428: 427: 409: 408: 407: 406: 389: 388: 387: 386: 351: 327: 326: 325: 324: 294: 293: 270: 269: 254: 253: 240: 239: 223: 222: 205: 204: 171: 170: 156:Nominator(s): 149: 148: 147: 146: 144:External links 141: 136: 128: 127: 121: 120: 67: 62: 61: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 640: 628: 625: 619: 618: 617: 610: 606: 602: 598: 597: 596: 593: 587: 583: 579: 575: 571: 570: 569: 565: 561: 556: 553: 547: 544: 541: 537: 536: 535: 532: 528: 527: 526: 522: 518: 517:BashBrannigan 514: 511: 507: 503: 499: 494: 493: 492: 488: 484: 480: 477: 476: 471: 467: 463: 458: 457: 456: 452: 448: 444: 441: 440: 437: 434: 433:User:Karanacs 430: 429: 426: 422: 418: 414: 411: 410: 405: 401: 397: 393: 392: 391: 390: 385: 381: 377: 373: 369: 368: 367: 363: 359: 355: 352: 350: 347: 345: 340: 339: 332: 329: 328: 323: 319: 315: 310: 309: 308: 304: 300: 296: 295: 292: 289: 284: 282: 275: 272: 271: 268: 264: 260: 256: 255: 252: 249: 245: 242: 241: 238: 235: 232: 228: 225: 224: 221: 218: 214: 210: 207: 206: 203: 199: 195: 191: 188: 187: 186: 185: 181: 177: 168: 167: 163: 159: 153: 152: 145: 142: 140: 137: 135: 132: 131: 130: 129: 124: 119: 116: 114: 111: 107: 103: 99: 94: 90: 85: 81: 77: 73: 66: 63: 60: 58: 55: 51: 44: 42: 37: 32: 27: 26: 19: 623: 620: 615: 554: 512: 478: 442: 412: 353: 343: 334: 330: 277: 273: 243: 226: 208: 189: 172: 155: 139:Citation bot 69: 54:SandyGeorgia 49: 47: 35: 28: 447:XavierGreen 287:talk to me? 194:Nikkimaria 560:TomStar81 280:Jimfbleak 601:Karanacs 574:Karanacs 543:Fatuorum 498:Karanacs 483:Fifelfoo 462:Karanacs 396:Karanacs 314:Karanacs 299:Karanacs 259:Karanacs 234:Fatuorum 213:Ealdgyth 209:Comments 176:Karanacs 158:Karanacs 134:Analysis 50:promoted 555:Support 540:Malleus 513:Comment 479:Comment 443:Support 413:Comment 354:Support 331:Support 244:Support 231:Malleus 227:Support 190:Comment 126:Toolbox 89:protect 84:history 531:Ucucha 248:Ucucha 93:delete 337:ceran 110:views 102:watch 98:links 16:< 605:talk 578:talk 564:Talk 521:talk 502:talk 487:talk 466:talk 451:talk 421:talk 400:talk 380:talk 374:. -- 362:talk 344:thor 318:talk 303:talk 263:talk 217:Talk 198:talk 180:talk 162:talk 106:logs 80:talk 76:edit 417:Tom 52:by 607:) 580:) 566:) 523:) 504:) 489:) 468:) 453:) 423:) 402:) 382:) 364:) 320:) 305:) 283:- 265:) 215:- 200:) 182:) 164:) 108:| 104:| 100:| 96:| 91:| 87:| 82:| 78:| 59:. 33:. 603:( 576:( 562:( 519:( 500:( 485:( 464:( 449:( 419:( 398:( 378:( 360:( 316:( 301:( 261:( 196:( 178:( 160:( 112:) 74:(

Index

Knowledge:Featured article candidates
featured article nomination
Knowledge talk:Featured article candidates
SandyGeorgia

Battle of Gonzales
Battle of Gonzales
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
Featured article candidates/Battle of Gonzales/archive1
Analysis
Citation bot
External links
Karanacs
talk
15:56, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
Karanacs
talk
15:56, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
Nikkimaria
talk
15:59, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
Ealdgyth

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑