1132:: the article had my full attention at peer review where I made many suggestions, mostly accepted, and did a certain amount of copyediting, too. Subsequent tweaks during this FAC have further improved the article, and I'm happy to support its promotion. PS: can you explain the meaning of "worted" which appears in the image review? Looks like a useful word to have around.
188:
Fifth para, "he bought the two women alcohol" needs initial cap for "he"; "During a row between Burke and McDougal—during which he threw ..." perhaps change to "A row broke out between ... ...—during which he threw ..." so during isn't repeated in such close proximity? "... and kept it in whisky for
1959:
I'm off. Thanks very much indeed to everyone who has taken part in what is, for me, and I dare so Gavin too, the last FAC for the project. The comments have been excellent and wide ranging and I hope the fixes that have been made by us both have satisfied each of your concerns. I look forward to
303:
I love the topic and think this is a terrific article. I didn't complete my review at PR (apologies for that). As I get time, I'll continue my needling pedantic trawl and post comments here. If/when the delegate is looking to close this and I've not yet said "support", please ping me. Massive kudos
1224:
I'm not fond of the link to serial killers in the opening sentence. Its an Easter egg; you would expect a related article to the "series of 16 murders", also, these guys were not serial killers in the usually understood sense - different motivation; really they were contract killers, though not in
401:
I've made a couple of tweaks, but I think your eye may be playing slight tricks on you here. Of the 108 sentences in this section, three begin "In ", three begin "On " and there is one other variant. This doesn't seem to be affecting the readability for me, although I am possibly too close to the
1978:
I had a dream that this would never reach consensus to promote and we'd just leave it open indefinitely and force you guys to create other quality articles in the meantime... Well, here's hoping that, despite the declarations to the contrary, we do see you back here some time. Thanks/cheers,
552:
Do we know much about
Margaret's background? I'm assuming she was Irish; a half-line in the "William Burke and William Hare" section may be good. Also, I see that she was referred to as Margaret Hare though she and Hare may not have married; again, making this explicit in the section may be
393:
General comment: we have an awful lot of sentences and (worse, in my book) paragraphs that begin in essentially the same manner: "In ", "On ", "At some point during ", etc. It's a style issue and tricky for you to fix, I know, but pulls down the overall outstanding quality level of the
1285:
I'm not sure we're in Easter egg territory, but let me think on it for the night. (In terms of the motivation, I've looked at our article, and it points to the FBI's definition as including financial gain as a motive.) I'll return with the thoughts on the egg point. -
1270:
I dont really care about the classification
Cassianto, although if how they might be described in modern criminology is discussed in the lit, then I would put a footnote here with a brief summary. its more the linkage, piped to "series of 16 murders".
1830:
I sidestepped the source entirely and found a contemporary that gives a figure of 35-40k, which I've footnoted. This one, by the way, is way over all other estimates I've seen, so it shows what the upper end of the estimates can be. Cheers -
1792:
1414:
If "The price per corpse changed depending on the season. It was ÂŁ8 during the summer, when the warmer temperatures brought on quicker decomposition, and ÂŁ10 in the winter months" then how come they only got ÂŁ7 10s for their first
1941:
This is a fine article which has had a lot of research and thought put into it. A shame this is to be the last, but I understand fully the frustrations of the editors as this support vote is likely one of my last actions here.
325:
Bark from a tanner: I'm guessing this doesn't mean wood bark. First, why would a tannery have bark and secondly, bark is far too light for the purposes. If it's unclear what's meant, can we replace with an obfuscation, such as
1815:
Difficult to judge how good it is as a source - let me try and have a better look at it first. The main modern sources are all at the 25k mark, but we could footnote it to show that all the sources are unsure of the number. -
371:
Only the difference between the summer and winter rates; I suspect he paid less for the first body because he was dealing with people who didn't know the exact rates, but the sources don't provide a reason, unfortunately. -
1795:
says "an estimated crowd between 25,000 and 30,000], though other sources I checked all just mention 25,000. Is the 30,000 figure worth putting is a footnote or are we okay to dismiss it as not as good as the others.
185:
Third para, sentence starting "The novelist Sir Walter Scott, who took a keen interest in the case, also thought the miller was the more likely victim ..." should that read first (or initial) victim?
111:. It's a fascinating case with strong cast, double-crossing, turning of blind eyes and a certain amount of covering up. Any and all constructive comments are welcome in this, our final FAC. Cheers –
1601:
I think we probably do, just to give an indication that they were earning good money, which provides the motive. Having said that, I'm not married to the phrase and could be persuaded. Cheers –
1770:
Hi
Ritchie, That's not reliable. The main sources all say that there are a range of stories about what may or may not have happened (including Australia), but actually nobody really knows. -
530:"she was sold to Knox for ÂŁ10" Earlier in the article you referred to bodies as "it"s rather than "(s)he"s. I think it may be useful to stick with the separation of a person and their corpse.
213:
Third para: " ... not all the witnesses on the list were called and Knox and three of his assistants avoided being questioned in court" maybe "Knox plus three" to save repetition of "and"?
856:"bodies of executed criminals—including those who died in prison—suicide victims," my reading of this says that "those who died in prison" are included in "executed criminals".
1149:
Many thanks Brian: your thoughts are, as they always have been, very much appreciated. "Worted" is a neologism I'm trying out - a portmanteau of worked and sorted! Cheers –
1245:, and I'd be happy to clarify that; however, "serial killer", by its very definition, surely, means a person who carried out a series of killings and says nothing of the
107:
As a final huzzah to the project, we have decided to plumb the depths of depravity to offer the ten-month alcohol-fuelled killing spree of two itinerant low-lives: the
1410:
It's a super article. I know this story really well and the article seems to tell the story well, and to be well-referenced and well-written. A couple of questions.
494:
I think we have to be careful in terms of cramming this full of films, programmes, books, etc... I think we're at full capacity in terms of trivia, in my opinion.
40:
1318:
My contract/serial issue above not withstanding - have read through 80% of the text and poked around enough at the edges of the sources to have confidence -
457:
315:
361:"but gave different sequences for the murders in each statement" doesn't belong in this sentence. It belongs with the bit about there being two confessions.
210:
Second para: "Several hours were spent on legal arguments on the objection." perhaps "Several hours were spent on legal arguments about the objection."?
1960:
this article's natural close, upon which, I hope, will bring with it a promotion. I wish everyone the best of luck for their respective future FAC's.
1466:, any ideas on this? Would "are a series of 16 killings" be incorrect compared to "were a series of 16 killings" as we are now talking in past tense?
1022:
Body implies corpse under some circumstances, but Burke only needed to restrain the victim until dead, I'm suggesting a change of word from "body".--
1999:
30:
17:
358:" the order in which the subsequent murders took place" pedantically, that could imply that the former was also a murder, when it seems it wasn't
516:
In the paragraph beginning "Most of the sources agree that the first murder", it'd be useful if you introduced that Joseph was a lodger earlier.
355:"to give the price of ÂŁ7 10s" - ambiguous and not terminology that is familiar to my BrEng ears. He fixed the price, he paid the money or both?
1304:
High quality sources, consistent ref formatting, fully licences images, engaging prose. I'm fixing any minor issued found as I read through.
2010:
2029:
1988:
1972:
1951:
1926:
1905:
1888:
1862:
1840:
1825:
1806:
1779:
1761:
1735:
1718:
1700:
1663:
1642:
1610:
1576:
1554:
1534:
1515:
1498:
1478:
1431:
1397:
1380:
1362:
1348:
1331:
1313:
1295:
1280:
1265:
1234:
1210:
1181:
1158:
1141:
1112:
1098:
1080:
1063:
1045:
1031:
1015:
987:
959:
931:
903:
875:
847:
806:
789:
771:
737:
719:
694:
661:
646:
626:
609:
592:
543:
506:
488:
461:
436:
415:
381:
346:
319:
285:
264:
247:
172:
Second para: "William Hare was probably born in either in County Armagh ..." remove second "in" and also possibly third "in" before Newry?
129:
99:
199:
Second para: "... speculative reports led to members of the public to assume that all missing people had been victims" to assume -: -->
1748:
1459:"The Burke and Hare murders were committed in Edinburgh, Scotland over a period of about ten months in 1828. The 16 killings were..."
750:
1453:"The Burke and Hare murders were a series of 16 murders committed in Edinburgh, Scotland over a period of about ten months in 1828."
1456:"The Burke and Hare murders are a series of 16 murders committed in Edinburgh, Scotland over a period of about ten months in 1828."
968:"The second was an unofficial interview " to vary the official/unofficial, I might say "The second was in the form of an interview"
1622:- my gut feeling is we can chop a word or two out to make this bit of prose tighter, but I can't think what off the top of my head
1860:
1804:
1759:
1716:
1179:
579:"in fictional literature" Wouldn't fictional literature be literature that is itself not real? "in fiction" would surely be fine?
169:
First para: link for Union Canal (Scotland) here rather than in second para; final sentence, shouldn't it be "the" Grassmarket?
513:"or as the fictional inspiration for other works" From the last line of the lead; what do you mean by "fictional inspiration"?
182:
Second para, last two sentences — perhaps change one instance of "sources" to "reports" or some such to save close repetition?
828:"and the growth in demand for cadavers to dissect led to a shortfall in the legal supply of corpses" I might cut "growth in"
1875:
A great read, and I really couldn't see anything I wanted to fix. I'm deeply shocked however, that you didn't mention the
1587:
This is a great article, and I've enjoyed reading it. I've made a few copyedits, feel free to revert and trout to taste
1876:
255:
Many, many thanks
SagaciousPhil: all your suggestions have been acted on. Very much appreciated, as always. Cheers -
390:"the policeman obliged" This is ambiguous. Normally, when you oblige you do something active, not passive. Clarify?
1440:
the
Sheriff-substitute, the Procurator fiscal and the Assistant Sheriff-clerk. - Need to fix the capitalisation.
145:
Both sentences in the final paragraph of the lead start with the words "The murders ..." could one be re-jigged?
479:
is about Burke and Hare, I believe. Might be worth adding. I'm surprised we don't have an article on the book.
1751:
says "Helen said to have emigrated to
Australia" - is there any truth in that, or is this source unreliable?
996:"while Burke lay across the body to restrict movement" presumably once it was a body, Mr Burke was redundant.
573:"A new word was coined from the murders: "burking", to" Words-as-words; this should be italicised, not quoted
242:
1137:
108:
72:
563:"as newspapers and broadsheets" Broadsheets are newspapers, surely? We wouldn't say "men and Englishmen".
1241:
I am sliding to agree with you with regards to the fact they killed for the money and not for the kick,
1947:
333:
No, it's wood bark (specifically oak, which is needed for some hides); the word "tanning" derives from
919:
This will mean people who reside in the area. I think it's pretty redundant so I've stripped it out.
1858:
1802:
1757:
1714:
1177:
767:
1968:
1922:
1884:
1789:
Burke was hanged on the morning of 28 January 1829 in front of a crowd possibly as large as 25,000;
1659:
1550:
1474:
1393:
1344:
1261:
1206:
1076:
1011:
983:
955:
927:
899:
871:
843:
802:
642:
622:
588:
539:
502:
484:
432:
281:
2003:
1943:
1522:
2025:
1984:
1901:
1836:
1821:
1775:
1731:
1696:
1638:
1606:
1494:
1427:
1358:
1291:
1168:
1154:
1094:
1041:
785:
733:
715:
690:
657:
605:
411:
377:
342:
260:
236:
116:
86:
1353:
Echoing Cass's thoughts on this: many thanks for your thoughts and edits on this one. Cheers -
1133:
1108:
1059:
1027:
557:
451:
309:
1852:- I can't think of anything else, so I guess that means it meets the FA criteria in my view.
61:
1853:
1797:
1752:
1709:
1376:
1327:
1309:
1276:
1230:
1172:
940:"mourning families" depends on the will, I'd imagine. Seriously, "bereaved" seems better.
763:
2002:
has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see
1963:
1917:
1911:
1880:
1654:
1630:
1572:
1545:
1530:
1511:
1486:
1469:
1388:
1339:
1256:
1201:
1071:
1006:
978:
950:
922:
894:
866:
838:
797:
638:
617:
584:
535:
497:
480:
427:
403:
276:
122:
92:
2021:
1980:
1897:
1832:
1817:
1771:
1727:
1692:
1634:
1602:
1490:
1463:
1423:
1354:
1336:
Great, thanks very much for taking a look and the fixes. I'm pleased you enjoyed it.
1287:
1250:
1191:
1150:
1090:
1037:
781:
729:
711:
686:
653:
601:
472:
407:
373:
338:
256:
112:
82:
53:
556:"because he could not be brought to testify against his wife" We have an article on
1104:
1086:
1055:
1023:
447:
305:
297:
1489:, I've tweaked per BB's PR suggestion, which we missed for some unknown reason. -
912:"Their victims were known in the locality." I can't piece together what this means
1788:
1744:
1674:
1619:
1591:
884:" grave robbing by what were known as the resurrection men" I might cut the "the"
2017:
57:
678:
File:Burke_Murdering_Margery_Campbell.jpg: when/where was this first published?
1681:
1372:
1323:
1322:
on the criteria I mentioned above. This was a very enjoyable few hours spent.
1305:
1272:
1242:
1226:
1568:
1539:
1526:
1507:
1446:
I blitzed the link. I'm now wondering about the opening and how to word it:
1195:
614:
Indeed, many thanks for your input here, Josh, and for your valued support.
1726:
Many thanks
Ritchie. I look forward to the rest of your comments. Cheers –
364:
Do we know why Knox paid such wildly varying sums of money for the corpses?
703:
Same with File:Cropping_a_Nox-i-ous_Plant;_Caricature_of_Robert_Knox.jpg
471:
Great topic, and I look forward to reading. As a quick driveby comment,
1036:
Sorry, missed that one earlier: now tweaked to "upper torso". Cheers -
424:
Nope, I don't see any such paragraphs, and if I do, they are sparse.
39:
Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in
1068:
Thank you so much for taking a look and for your valued support.
755:
Some books include locations, others don't - should be consistent
406:, you didn't write the section I did: how does it look to you? –
549:"a warrant was sworn out" I'm not sure I know what this means.
189:
three months before dissecting it" perhaps "stored in whisky"?
600:
Many thanks Josh, all tweaked per your suggestions. Cheers -
1879:
on which most of my prior knowledge of this topic relies (:
273:
Echoed from me, SP. Your comments are always hugely valued.
710:
This was a contemporary print; now noted on the licence. -
637:
based on the prose only. No view on the sources or images.
519:"who Burke described in his confession" Shouldn't that be
231:
These are very minor nit-picks and do not detract from my
1620:
the demand for which increased as the science developed
1003:
I'm a bit slow on the uptake with this, unfortunatley.
159:
First para, 2nd sentence: comma missing after John Bell
65:
780:
Thanks
Nikkimaria: sources all now tweaked. Cheers –
1443:I share Ceoil's qualms about the link in the lead.
1592:They received what was, for them, the generous sum
200:assuming? Or just "led members of the public ...."
2037:The above discussion is preserved as an archive.
1089:: your thoughts are hugely appreciated. Cheers -
728:Many thanks Nikkimaria, all now worted. Cheers -
194:Developments: investigation and the path to court
227:Refs need re-ordered at end of 1st and 2nd para.
41:Knowledge (XXG) talk:Featured article candidates
43:. No further edits should be made to this page.
2043:No further edits should be made to this page.
2016:template in place on the talk page until the
1745:there are no clear accounts of her later life
652:Many thanks Josh; much appreciated! Cheers –
29:The following is an archived discussion of a
8:
1896:Many thanks Jim. Much appreciated. Cheers -
566:"editorialising that he should" Can you use
18:Knowledge (XXG):Featured article candidates
1385:Thanks for the excellent comments, Ceoil.
1675:one of two sons, to middle-class parents
177:Events of November 1827 to November 1828
534:Pausing for now; a great read so far!
7:
822:Great article, just a few quibbles.
758:Suggest including volume number for
1542:, I think this has now been fixed.
1194:is quite obviously slipping in to
24:
1684:be linked in the picture caption?
1594:- do we need "generous sum" here?
1085:Echoing that thanks from me too,
560:, if that would be a useful link.
154:Anatomy in 19th-century Edinburgh
1190:Yes, thank you very much Brian.
576:"circulating round the" Around?
2030:12:10, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
1989:12:10, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
1973:18:26, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
1952:11:21, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
1927:18:26, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
1906:14:29, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
1889:14:21, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
1863:12:59, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
1841:07:21, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
1826:20:02, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
1807:19:58, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
1780:19:55, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
1762:19:53, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
1736:19:10, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
1719:16:56, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
1701:19:10, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
1677:- is the comma necessary here?
1664:09:48, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
1643:19:10, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
1611:17:29, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
1577:18:46, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
1555:22:26, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
1535:08:28, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
1516:22:50, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
1499:06:08, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
1479:23:57, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
1432:07:08, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
1398:18:26, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
1381:00:58, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
1363:19:31, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
1349:17:30, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
1332:16:43, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
1314:16:07, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
1296:19:31, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
1281:15:58, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
1266:15:55, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
1235:15:44, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
1211:14:42, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
1182:16:59, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
1159:13:38, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
1142:13:08, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
1113:08:51, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
1099:07:32, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
1081:23:59, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
1064:20:40, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
1046:08:57, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
1032:08:51, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
1016:23:59, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
988:23:59, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
960:23:59, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
932:23:59, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
904:23:59, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
876:23:59, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
848:23:59, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
807:20:36, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
790:19:41, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
772:19:12, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
738:08:01, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
720:08:01, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
695:08:01, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
662:20:53, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
647:19:36, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
627:20:35, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
610:19:26, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
593:14:42, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
544:14:02, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
507:06:21, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
489:23:54, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
462:13:27, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
437:18:16, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
416:09:40, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
382:14:49, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
347:14:49, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
320:15:42, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
286:06:22, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
265:13:36, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
248:13:24, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
164:William Burke and William Hare
130:12:14, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
100:12:14, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
1:
794:Thanks NM, much appreciated.
2011:featured article candidates
135:Comments from Sagaciousphil
64:) 12:10, 29 September 2016
31:featured article nomination
2060:
1633:, any thoughts on this? -
1371:It was a pleasure, Gavin.
1125:Comments from Brianboulton
1910:Indeed, thanks very much
685:Source book now added. -
2040:Please do not modify it.
1691:Bottom two both done. -
1583:Comments from Ritchie333
1225:the usual sense either.
1054:A very enjoyable read.--
668:Image and source reviews
36:Please do not modify it.
1747:re : Helen McDougall -
467:Comments from J Milburn
760:London Medical Gazette
746:- spotchecks not done
337:, meaning oak bark. -
109:Burke and Hare murders
73:Burke and Hare murders
1422:Not in the sources -
235:of this nomination.
1198:the older he gets.
1167:Nothing to do with
815:Comments by Wehwalt
446:More when I can. --
1877:famous documentary
1406:Comments from John
1169:Worting, Hampshire
304:to the authors. --
1957:Note to delegates
558:spousal privilege
460:
318:
103:
2051:
2042:
2015:
2009:
2006:, and leave the
1970:
1966:
1924:
1920:
1870:Support from Jim
1790:
1746:
1676:
1661:
1657:
1621:
1593:
1552:
1548:
1506:More to come. --
1476:
1472:
1395:
1391:
1346:
1342:
1263:
1259:
1208:
1204:
1078:
1074:
1013:
1009:
985:
981:
957:
953:
929:
925:
901:
897:
873:
869:
845:
841:
804:
800:
624:
620:
504:
500:
455:
434:
430:
313:
283:
279:
239:
127:
125:
97:
95:
79:
48:The article was
38:
2059:
2058:
2054:
2053:
2052:
2050:
2049:
2048:
2047:
2038:
2013:
2007:
1964:
1962:
1918:
1916:
1655:
1653:
1585:
1546:
1544:
1470:
1468:
1408:
1389:
1387:
1340:
1338:
1257:
1255:
1221:
1202:
1200:
1127:
1072:
1070:
1007:
1005:
979:
977:
951:
949:
923:
921:
895:
893:
867:
865:
839:
837:
817:
798:
796:
670:
618:
616:
583:Very engaging!
527:is the subject.
498:
496:
469:
428:
426:
301:
277:
275:
237:
137:
123:
121:
93:
91:
76:
34:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
2057:
2055:
2046:
2045:
2033:
2032:
2020:goes through.
1992:
1991:
1939:
1938:
1932:
1931:
1930:
1929:
1908:
1873:
1872:
1866:
1865:
1846:
1845:
1844:
1843:
1828:
1810:
1809:
1785:
1784:
1783:
1782:
1765:
1764:
1741:
1740:
1739:
1738:
1706:
1705:
1704:
1703:
1686:
1685:
1678:
1671:
1670:
1669:
1668:
1667:
1666:
1646:
1645:
1624:
1623:
1616:
1615:
1614:
1613:
1596:
1595:
1584:
1581:
1580:
1579:
1560:
1559:
1558:
1557:
1504:
1503:
1502:
1501:
1461:
1460:
1457:
1454:
1450:
1449:
1448:
1447:
1441:
1437:
1436:
1435:
1434:
1417:
1416:
1407:
1404:
1403:
1402:
1401:
1400:
1369:
1368:
1367:
1366:
1365:
1351:
1301:
1300:
1299:
1298:
1268:
1249:behind them?
1238:
1237:
1220:
1217:
1216:
1215:
1214:
1213:
1187:
1186:
1185:
1184:
1162:
1161:
1126:
1123:
1122:
1121:
1120:
1119:
1118:
1117:
1116:
1115:
1083:
1052:
1051:
1050:
1049:
1048:
1019:
1018:
998:
997:
993:
992:
991:
990:
970:
969:
965:
964:
963:
962:
942:
941:
937:
936:
935:
934:
914:
913:
909:
908:
907:
906:
886:
885:
881:
880:
879:
878:
858:
857:
853:
852:
851:
850:
830:
829:
816:
813:
812:
811:
810:
809:
792:
775:
774:
756:
753:
741:
740:
725:
724:
723:
722:
705:
704:
700:
699:
698:
697:
680:
679:
669:
666:
665:
664:
632:
631:
630:
629:
612:
581:
580:
577:
574:
571:
568:editorialising
564:
561:
554:
550:
532:
531:
528:
517:
514:
510:
509:
475:'s teen novel
468:
465:
458:old fashioned!
444:
443:
442:
441:
440:
439:
419:
418:
396:
395:
391:
387:
386:
385:
384:
366:
365:
362:
359:
356:
352:
351:
350:
349:
328:
327:
316:old fashioned!
300:
296:Comments from
294:
293:
292:
291:
290:
289:
288:
268:
267:
229:
228:
215:
214:
211:
202:
201:
191:
190:
186:
183:
174:
173:
170:
161:
160:
147:
146:
136:
133:
105:
104:
81:Nominator(s):
75:
70:
69:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2056:
2044:
2041:
2035:
2034:
2031:
2027:
2023:
2019:
2012:
2005:
2001:
1997:
1994:
1993:
1990:
1986:
1982:
1977:
1976:
1975:
1974:
1971:
1969:
1967:
1958:
1954:
1953:
1949:
1945:
1937:
1934:
1933:
1928:
1925:
1923:
1921:
1913:
1909:
1907:
1903:
1899:
1895:
1894:
1893:
1892:
1891:
1890:
1886:
1882:
1878:
1871:
1868:
1867:
1864:
1861:
1859:
1857:
1856:
1851:
1848:
1847:
1842:
1838:
1834:
1829:
1827:
1823:
1819:
1814:
1813:
1812:
1811:
1808:
1805:
1803:
1801:
1800:
1794:
1787:
1786:
1781:
1777:
1773:
1769:
1768:
1767:
1766:
1763:
1760:
1758:
1756:
1755:
1750:
1743:
1742:
1737:
1733:
1729:
1725:
1724:
1723:
1722:
1721:
1720:
1717:
1715:
1713:
1712:
1702:
1698:
1694:
1690:
1689:
1688:
1687:
1683:
1679:
1673:
1672:
1665:
1662:
1660:
1658:
1651:I'm stumped.
1650:
1649:
1648:
1647:
1644:
1640:
1636:
1632:
1628:
1627:
1626:
1625:
1618:
1617:
1612:
1608:
1604:
1600:
1599:
1598:
1597:
1590:
1589:
1588:
1582:
1578:
1574:
1570:
1566:
1562:
1561:
1556:
1553:
1551:
1549:
1541:
1538:
1537:
1536:
1532:
1528:
1524:
1520:
1519:
1518:
1517:
1513:
1509:
1500:
1496:
1492:
1488:
1485:
1484:
1483:
1482:
1481:
1480:
1477:
1475:
1473:
1465:
1458:
1455:
1452:
1451:
1445:
1444:
1442:
1439:
1438:
1433:
1429:
1425:
1421:
1420:
1419:
1418:
1413:
1412:
1411:
1405:
1399:
1396:
1394:
1392:
1384:
1383:
1382:
1378:
1374:
1370:
1364:
1360:
1356:
1352:
1350:
1347:
1345:
1343:
1335:
1334:
1333:
1329:
1325:
1321:
1317:
1316:
1315:
1311:
1307:
1303:
1302:
1297:
1293:
1289:
1284:
1283:
1282:
1278:
1274:
1269:
1267:
1264:
1262:
1260:
1252:
1248:
1244:
1240:
1239:
1236:
1232:
1228:
1223:
1222:
1218:
1212:
1209:
1207:
1205:
1197:
1196:the professor
1193:
1189:
1188:
1183:
1180:
1178:
1176:
1175:
1170:
1166:
1165:
1164:
1163:
1160:
1156:
1152:
1148:
1147:
1146:
1145:
1144:
1143:
1139:
1135:
1131:
1124:
1114:
1110:
1106:
1102:
1101:
1100:
1096:
1092:
1088:
1084:
1082:
1079:
1077:
1075:
1067:
1066:
1065:
1061:
1057:
1053:
1047:
1043:
1039:
1035:
1034:
1033:
1029:
1025:
1021:
1020:
1017:
1014:
1012:
1010:
1002:
1001:
1000:
999:
995:
994:
989:
986:
984:
982:
974:
973:
972:
971:
967:
966:
961:
958:
956:
954:
946:
945:
944:
943:
939:
938:
933:
930:
928:
926:
918:
917:
916:
915:
911:
910:
905:
902:
900:
898:
890:
889:
888:
887:
883:
882:
877:
874:
872:
870:
862:
861:
860:
859:
855:
854:
849:
846:
844:
842:
834:
833:
832:
831:
827:
826:
825:
824:
823:
821:
814:
808:
805:
803:
801:
793:
791:
787:
783:
779:
778:
777:
776:
773:
769:
765:
761:
757:
754:
752:
749:
748:
747:
745:
744:Source review
739:
735:
731:
727:
726:
721:
717:
713:
709:
708:
707:
706:
702:
701:
696:
692:
688:
684:
683:
682:
681:
677:
676:
675:
674:
667:
663:
659:
655:
651:
650:
649:
648:
644:
640:
636:
628:
625:
623:
621:
613:
611:
607:
603:
599:
598:
597:
596:
595:
594:
590:
586:
578:
575:
572:
569:
565:
562:
559:
555:
551:
548:
547:
546:
545:
541:
537:
529:
526:
522:
518:
515:
512:
511:
508:
505:
503:
501:
493:
492:
491:
490:
486:
482:
478:
474:
473:Nicola Morgan
466:
464:
463:
459:
453:
449:
438:
435:
433:
431:
423:
422:
421:
420:
417:
413:
409:
405:
400:
399:
398:
397:
392:
389:
388:
383:
379:
375:
370:
369:
368:
367:
363:
360:
357:
354:
353:
348:
344:
340:
336:
332:
331:
330:
329:
324:
323:
322:
321:
317:
311:
307:
299:
295:
287:
284:
282:
280:
272:
271:
270:
269:
266:
262:
258:
254:
253:
252:
251:
250:
249:
246:
245:
240:
238:SagaciousPhil
234:
226:
225:
224:
223:
219:
212:
209:
208:
207:
206:
198:
197:
196:
195:
187:
184:
181:
180:
179:
178:
171:
168:
167:
166:
165:
158:
157:
156:
155:
151:
144:
143:
142:
141:
134:
132:
131:
128:
126:
118:
114:
110:
102:
101:
98:
96:
88:
84:
83:User:SchroCat
78:
77:
74:
71:
68:
66:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
37:
32:
27:
26:
19:
2039:
2036:
1996:Closing note
1995:
1961:
1956:
1955:
1940:
1935:
1915:
1874:
1869:
1854:
1849:
1798:
1753:
1710:
1707:
1652:
1629:Me neither!
1586:
1564:
1543:
1505:
1467:
1462:
1409:
1386:
1337:
1319:
1254:
1253:, thoughts?
1246:
1199:
1173:
1171:I guess :-)
1134:Brianboulton
1129:
1128:
1069:
1004:
976:
948:
920:
892:
864:
836:
819:
818:
795:
759:
743:
742:
673:Image review
672:
671:
639:Josh Milburn
634:
633:
615:
585:Josh Milburn
582:
567:
536:Josh Milburn
533:
524:
520:
495:
481:Josh Milburn
476:
470:
445:
425:
334:
302:
298:User:Dweller
274:
243:
232:
230:
221:
217:
216:
204:
203:
193:
192:
176:
175:
163:
162:
153:
149:
148:
139:
138:
120:
106:
90:
80:
49:
47:
35:
28:
1793:this source
1749:this source
1708:More later
477:Fleshmarket
326:"material".
222:Legislation
1855:Ritchie333
1799:Ritchie333
1754:Ritchie333
1711:Ritchie333
1682:death mask
1174:Ritchie333
1103:Glad to.--
764:Nikkimaria
570:like that?
150:Background
2004:WP:FAC/ar
2000:candidate
1965:Cassianto
1919:Cassianto
1881:Jimfbleak
1656:Cassianto
1547:Cassianto
1523:WP:REFERS
1471:Cassianto
1390:Cassianto
1341:Cassianto
1258:Cassianto
1203:Cassianto
1073:Cassianto
1008:Cassianto
980:Cassianto
952:Cassianto
924:Cassianto
896:Cassianto
868:Cassianto
840:Cassianto
799:Cassianto
751:Dead link
619:Cassianto
499:Cassianto
429:Cassianto
278:Cassianto
124:Cassianto
94:Cassianto
2022:Ian Rose
1998:: This
1981:Ian Rose
1464:SchroCat
1247:mens rea
119:) &
89:) &
54:Ian Rose
50:promoted
1944:We hope
1936:Support
1850:Support
1680:Should
1565:support
1415:corpse?
1320:Support
1130:Support
1105:Wehwalt
1087:Wehwalt
1056:Wehwalt
1024:Wehwalt
820:Support
635:Support
456:Become
448:Dweller
394:article
314:Become
306:Dweller
233:Support
1563:I now
975:Done.
947:Done.
891:Done.
863:Done.
835:Done.
402:text:
335:tannum
218:Legacy
58:FACBot
1898:Gavin
1833:Gavin
1818:Gavin
1772:Gavin
1728:Gavin
1693:Gavin
1635:Gavin
1603:Gavin
1491:Gavin
1424:Gavin
1373:Ceoil
1355:Gavin
1324:Ceoil
1306:Ceoil
1288:Gavin
1273:Ceoil
1251:Gavin
1243:Ceoil
1227:Ceoil
1219:Ceoil
1192:Gavin
1151:Gavin
1091:Gavin
1038:Gavin
782:Gavin
730:Gavin
712:Gavin
687:Gavin
654:Gavin
602:Gavin
553:good.
525:Burke
408:Gavin
374:Gavin
339:Gavin
257:Gavin
205:Trial
113:Gavin
16:<
2026:talk
1985:talk
1948:talk
1902:talk
1885:talk
1837:talk
1822:talk
1776:talk
1732:talk
1697:talk
1639:talk
1631:Cass
1607:talk
1573:talk
1569:John
1567:. --
1540:John
1531:talk
1527:John
1525:. --
1521:See
1512:talk
1508:John
1495:talk
1487:Cass
1428:talk
1377:talk
1359:talk
1328:talk
1310:talk
1292:talk
1277:talk
1231:talk
1155:talk
1138:talk
1109:talk
1095:talk
1060:talk
1042:talk
1028:talk
786:talk
768:talk
734:talk
716:talk
691:talk
658:talk
643:talk
606:talk
589:talk
540:talk
521:whom
485:talk
452:talk
412:talk
404:Cass
378:talk
343:talk
310:talk
261:talk
244:Chat
140:Lead
117:talk
87:talk
62:talk
56:via
2018:bot
1912:Jim
52:by
2028:)
2014:}}
2008:{{
1987:)
1950:)
1914:.
1904:)
1887:)
1839:)
1824:)
1791:-
1778:)
1734:)
1699:)
1641:)
1609:)
1575:)
1533:)
1514:)
1497:)
1430:)
1379:)
1361:)
1330:)
1312:)
1294:)
1279:)
1233:)
1157:)
1140:)
1111:)
1097:)
1062:)
1044:)
1030:)
788:)
770:)
762:.
736:)
718:)
693:)
660:)
645:)
608:)
591:)
542:)
523:?
487:)
454:)
414:)
380:)
345:)
312:)
263:)
241:-
220:,
152:,
67:.
33:.
2024:(
1983:(
1946:(
1900:(
1883:(
1835:(
1820:(
1774:(
1730:(
1695:(
1637:(
1605:(
1571:(
1529:(
1510:(
1493:(
1426:(
1375:(
1357:(
1326:(
1308:(
1290:(
1275:(
1229:(
1153:(
1136:(
1107:(
1093:(
1058:(
1040:(
1026:(
784:(
766:(
732:(
714:(
689:(
656:(
641:(
604:(
587:(
538:(
483:(
450:(
410:(
376:(
341:(
308:(
259:(
115:(
85:(
60:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.