1555:, but I don't see clear support there for this. There's a discussion of elaborate makeup and horrendous drawings, and the concept was toned down, but not of a "large monstrosity". I don't think it's fair to say that "the concept for both the painting and physical form of the central villain Vigo went through many changes", is close to "The whole Vigo concept went through various design changes.", it's a basic fact, you couldn't say it many other ways but the two sentences are wildly different. I removed mention of the painting, I personally consider mention of him moving out of the painting to be discussion relating to the painting, but it is discussed further down so nothing is lost. The second source needed an additional page number, but it says separately in the last paragraph "monstrous" and "huge", it is of course paraphrased because otherwise there are issues with too close paraphrasing.
2493:
production, but the film itself wasn't going ahead because Murray was not participating. I did search for info re: McElwain and
Ghostbusters previously but I will take another look if I can clarify the timescales better. EDIT: Reading the source, it seems like most other films, where someone writes a script hoping to get it turned into a film. Aykroyd/Reitman were working on a script, though by May the same time, Reitman was surprised that Puttnam said they were starting production in November, when he hadn't even heard production was starting.
2481:"By May 1987, Aykroyd and Ramis had been working for over a year" - so I expected something in the "Development" section to mention something in 1986 about when the sequel was being conceived/given the go-ahead. If Aykroyd and Ramis started in May 1986, I don't get why you start by focusing so much on David Puttnam becoming chairman a month later. Like, did Reitman get signed on as director around this time? I don't really know how the whole Hollywood business works. Just an observation
1651:. I'm sorry to oppose here, because I think there's been a good-faith effort to use relevant sources, and I think there's a lot of good material here. I'm opposing because looking at these last three examples makes me concerned that some sources are imprecisely represented in the article. I think the fix will not require major changes to the text, but it will require some tedious work to review each source's use and to be sure it's been accurately used.
990:). I think this can be fixed fairly easily (WP:RECEPTION has some worked examples): there has to be some sense in reading the commentary that it has been organized for the purposes of the article, usually by grouping reviews with related opinions together and then wordsmithing to avoid simply listing each opinion. Once that's fixed I'll be happy to strike the oppose and will look at the rest of the article.
2696:"This is demonstrated during the courtroom scene, when the executed Scoleri brothers' return to wreak havoc, demonstrating a failure of the legal system. " - you use "demonstrated/ing" twice in the sentence. Also, the Scoleri brothers came back from the dead. If you consider it thematically a failure of the legal system, I suggest you state who specifically compares these concepts.
1540:, which says "The whole Vigo concept went through various design changes" and then adds some details. This is a bit too closely paraphrased, and as above I don't think is very precise -- the concept for the painting did not go through design changes. If you mean that at one point Vigo was supposed to emerge from the painting, that's not clear.
2672:"Financially, Ghostbusters II was a relative success but it failed to meet studio expectations as a sequel to the highest-grossing comedy of all time, and despite being predicted to outperform its rival films before its release it failed to do so." - that's a lot for a sentence starting a section, and I suggest splitting it up
2201:"As the sequel to the highest-grossing comedy film, Ghostbusters II was expected to dominate the box office but the film earned $ 215.4 million during its theatrical run compared with the original's $ 282.2 million, making it the eighth-highest-grossing film of the year." - it's a long sentence. Could you split it up into two?
2457:"In particular, David Puttnam, who became chairman of Columbia Pictures in June 1986, was reported to have been removed from his job for alienating Murray and his talent agent Michael Ovitz." - this feels like it should go after "In September 1987, Puttnam left Columbia and was replaced as its president by Dawn Steel."
2339:
For the cast photo under "Cast", I have two issues. "Stars of the film include (l–r) Bill Murray, Dan
Aykroyd, Sigourney Weaver, Ernie Hudson, Harold Ramis, and Rick Moranis." - first, perhaps you should indicate which row, so we're not left to assume that it's clockwise. Also, you end with a period,
716:
had been scheduled for release on the July 4th holiday weekend..."? I know it isn't just celebrated in the US (my parents went to
Ireland for their honeymoon and they say that for some inexplicable reason they celebrate it there) but some readers who aren't familiar with America may not recognize its
297:
in not using "contemporary" to mean "present-day"; in art it usually means the opposite, "at the time", and indeed "contemporaneous" is used in the article to that effect. Use "retrospective", "present-day", "modern", or other words as needed. Better yet, consider rewording them to be more temporally
182:
I'm glad you agree with Laser brain and I that scholarly sources need to be incorporated, but I do note that of the four sources I identified in the previous FAC, three are now cited several times in the article, as is a scholarly book identified by Aoba47. (One of the four sources I identified isn't
1699:
We had a COVID-19 case at one of the offices I work in so I'm having to deal with setting up scores of people to work from home, which is just to say I don't know how available I'll be to review this again. To be honest I would like to get another opinion from someone with a lot of FAC experience.
1587:
I think reading the source that both quantity and success is established there, they don't literally use the word "quantity", but the opening in particular discusses the "glut" of films, that films are open, other studios want them to open but there's no space, Peter Pan causing James Bond to delay,
1395:
Also, this sentence, which precedes the one I just quoted above, doesn't stand on any additional sourcing -- the sentence above starting "Afterman went to..." supports both the sentences in the article. It's not exactly wrong as it is but I see no reason why we should expand into two sentences with
1273:
These are from two sources, but it would flow more smoothly to make it something like "The ghost train scene, which was filmed at the Tunnel night club in New York, was added to give a sense of an unseen force trying to keep the
Ghostbusters away." (Regardless of how you rephrase it, please get rid
504:
Done all except the first. I understand what you're saying but there are script variations and then effectively a completely different film. Some films don't have much script turmoil at all but there are significant differences between what was originally proposed versus what we got. Also watch both
452:"... large sections of the film were scrapped after poorly received test screenings." I could be incorrect, but should there be a hyphen in "poorly received"? Again, if you don't agree just ignore this, but I think a hyphen could be added since the "-ly" adverb is part of a larger compound adjective.
2492:
was producer between 1983 and 1986 but he just had a long succession of flops, there's no mention of
Ghostbusters II under him. The information I can find seems to suggest that the Aykroyd just started writing, similar to how he wrote Ghostbusters III in the 1990s despite there not being a film in
145:
the first time this was at FAC about incorporation of sources regarding the themes of the film; while I wasn't one to comment on the sources as I didn't see any from a cursory GSearch and would have procrastinated a deeper search, I looked further in that FAC and saw that Josh
Milburn provided you
1575:
Another issue was the quantity of films being released close together and unexpected successes that meant films were staying in theaters longer than anticipated. By only mid-July, some theaters were alternating
Ghostbusters II and The Karate Kid III on the same screen because of their diminishing
1957:
For the record, because you've used a bolded oppose three times, the software is reading that as thee individual opposes; it doesn't recognise striking them through  :) So at the moment the nom page says theer are "5 supports/3 opposes", whereas it's ("only") "5 supports/1 oppose". Not a comment
942:
over several weeks to make improvements, so this is not a drive-by support. I am glad to see this back again and that a good compromise appears to have been reached on the disagreements in round one. I am satisfied that my concerns were addressed in the previous FAC, and I am happy to support.
2061:
How does possessing a child = being able to rule the world? Or does he want to rule the world and inhabit a kid's body while he's at it? This sentence is incredibly confusing on its own. Please include the main idea of Oscar (I think that's the kid's name) into the plot to better explain this
1079:
After this, the film was rushed into production, with filming scheduled for summer 1988 in anticipation of a mid-1989 release. Months of negotiations followed the lunch with
Reitman, Murray, Aykroyd, and Ramis to negotiate a minimal salary in exchange for a percentage of the box office
315:
I have to disagree with TheJoebro64 on not including the "many variations" of the script. Even if it is common knowledge that movie scripts change a lot in their lifetimes (which it might not be), the radical changes of the script detailed in the section warrants special note of
1606:
The article was written in mid-July and mentions Lethal Weapon 2, which was only released on July 7. The "only" is because this was just under a month of release later it was flailing despite being a follow up to this huge blockbuster. I can remove the "only" if it is an issue
2838:
I'm happy to support the article. Thanks for your edits, research, and hard work! I hope you consider reviewing one of the five other tropical cyclone articles that aren't mine (yes, there's one more than when I first left my comment five days ago). Cheers
Darkwarriorblake ♫
344:
Done all of these as far as I can tell. I left the
Manhattan part in (as in Manhattan's Second Avenue) because for some people, myself included, I can confuse Manhattan with another name for New York City, like the Big Apple. Might just be I'm bad at geography though.
2562:"Hudson was filmed against a blue screen so he would appear in the river; his motion in the river had to be animated by hand against the river's natural movements." - you mentioned in the previous sentence three actors falling into the river, but only one here, why?
1377:: several minor things wrong here. The source can't say he was at his peak -- it's a contemporary source and from 2020 that statement implicitly refers to his whole career. I'm perfectly willing to believe it's true, but it can't be sourced by a 1989 article.
1987:
Thanks for the note. I think I’ll leave the bolding as it is; there are other problems with the nominations viewer anyway, and I know the coords will read through, and I think it’s probably easier for them to see my various changes of mind if they’re bolded.
2393:
The most direct quote is “an actor who makes millions off movies but gives nothing back to his art. He’s a taker.” It's not explicit in what he didn't give back, though I assume he means the disappearing for ages at a time and no really being into promotion.
1992:, I’m striking my oppose. What David found was real but minor and that increases my confidence there is not a pervasive problem here. I can’t in good conscience support without reading through again, and I can’t commit to doing that in a reasonable time.
201:
now in the article. If a source wasn't used it was mainly because Ghostbusters II was literally only mentioned in regards to the main topic of discussion and otherwise not analysed. I'd suggest reading it before opposing it. Thanks for your review.
1695:
Changed to weak oppose as none of what I found was terrible -- I just don't think it's our best work. I certainly have sympathy for the effects of multiple copyeditors on source-text integrity; I've seen that problem many times and it is hard to
2025:
Critics responded unfavorably to what they perceived as largely a copy of the original and a softening of its cynical, dark humor to be more family-friendly. although the performances of Peter MacNicol and Moranis were repeatedly singled out for
1198:: wordy; can we cut this to something like "realized changes would be needed"? Or even cut the sentence completely? It doesn't say anything not covered by the following sentences, though it does serve as a topic sentence for the paragraph.
1869:
1,339 is used in the article and is backed up by BoxOfficeMojo, so either their 1,073 figure is wrong or they're referring to opening day figures versus widest release figures. But the figures used in the article are as reported. Pinging
2069:
I changed it to this "Vigo orders Janosz to bring him a child to possess, allowing him to escape the confines of his painting and live again to conquer the world. Because of his infatuation with Dana, Janosz chooses Oscar." Any better?
1704:, would you mind taking a look? If David has time to look, and if his spot checks find nothing similar to what I'm complaining about, I'd be willing to strike the oppose, and I would then try to go through again and, I hope, support.
2227:
Any better- "In the courtroom, the slime sample is presented as evidence. It responds physically to judge Wexler's angry tirade against the Ghostbusters and then explodes, summoning the ghosts of two brothers he sentenced to death.?
2752:
All in all it's a decent article. I hope my comments aren't too troublesome. I also hope you consider reviewing another tropical cyclone article (there are four on FAC that aren't mine and could use an outsiders' review). Cheers! ♫
2311:"A chorus of "Auld Lang Syne" sung by the gathered crowds outside neutralizes the slime, weakening Vigo and forcing him to return to the painting and free the Ghostbusters." - this would be better as two sentences, it feels rushed
2088:
Aykroyd's niece Karen Humber portrays a schoolchild, and director Ivan Reitman's children Jason and Catherine portray, respectively, the rude child at the opening birthday party and a girl with a puppy that is part of Egon's
986:. I've only looked at the critical response section and I think this is not yet at FA quality. Almost the entire section is structured as a bullet list of opinions converted to prose. This is the "A said B" problem (see
1349:: much too closely paraphrased from the source, which is: "Afterman went to MCA Records, Brown’s label, with an offer: MCA could have the lucrative rights to the Ghostbusters II soundtrack if Brown agreed to participate".
455:"... family-friendly. The performances of ..." There's nothing in particular wrong here, but I think these two sentences could benefit from a better transition. Maybe something across the lines of "... family-friendly,
1682:, you have to remember that it's been copy edited about three times since I wrote it, meaning can get lost sometimes from what I originally wrote, but the examples you're finding should be few and far between.
476:
audiences appreciated the film..." I know you're talking about contemporary as in the present here, but I think "retrospective" is better because it's more clear that you're referring to modern-day audiences.
2212:
was expected to dominate the box office. Instead, the film earned $ 215.4 million during its theatrical run compared with the original's $ 282.2 million, making it the eighth-highest-grossing film of the
2126:
It is an interesting film, the failure despite everything working for it allows for a much more interesting backstory than the unmitigated success of the original. Thanks for taking the time to review it
142:
1124:
The pair wanted negative emotions to have consequences and found humor in New York City having to be nice or face destruction, though at this point they did know what form the destructor would take.
1457:
Again some unnecessary duplication; we don't need both "helped write" and "co-written". And was the co-writer Run-DMC? The source doesn't seem to explicitly say so, unless I'm missing something.
1223:: suggest "The test screenings made it clear that audiences liked the film but felt" -- the citation will tell the reader who said this, if they care; it's not useful information in this sentence.
2786:
I've addressed most of your issues. I'm going to be a little longer with the comments re: Puttnam as it will require a greater restructuring of that section since other things feed out of it. BRB
2770:
Thanks for taking the time to review this Hurricanehink. I am looking to go through your notes tomorrow. I'm also off next week so I'll be happy to look at one of the articles you mentioned.
2799:
Thanks for the replies so far! Lemme know how the restructuring works out. Sorry to be picky on that front, but I think the article will be even stronger with that extra bit of clarity. ♫
1756:
Then-Columbia Pictures executive David Puttnam was blamed for Ghostbusters II's lengthy production, though director Ivan Reitman said it was more the fault of the reluctant cast and crew.
1436:
Is "cameo" the right word for the music video appearances? A music video is so short that it seems unnecessary to draw the distinction. If this is common practice, though, that's fine.
2702:"defining it outside the atypical American stereotype of purity." - I feel like "outside" and "atypical" cancel each other out. "atypical American stereotype" seems like an odd construct
1375:
Aiming to replicate the success of the original, soundtrack producer Peter Afterman wanted to hire Bobby Brown, who was at the peak of his popularity following a succession of hit songs
2634:"Based on its gross and an average increase in ticket price of 22% since Ghostbusters' release, an estimated 2 million more people went to see the film. " - that weekend, or overall?
1106:
Casting is part of production, negotiation included. At least is my understanding. It was already well into development because they'd been trying to get this far for 5 years.
1860:
Ref 89/90 asser Ghostbusters II opened on 2410 theaters compared to the original's 1339. The Box Office Mojo source gives the 2410 figure, but the LA Times article only says
219:
Well, this is extremely embarrassing. I had looked through the sources in the source code and it appears that the one I selected for checking is the one that didn't appear.
1622:
The "diminishing returns" is supported in the source, but you can't say "some theaters" -- the article is talking about one small market; I think one cineplex, in fact.
1460:
The Collider source says co-written by parker and performed by RunDMC. Run DMC were writers on it, I'll try to find a clearer source. Changed "help write" to "develop".
1774:
on the article, unless I'm missing something. I think you skipped a reference. Likewise, ref 4 and 16 do both mention the actors having creative control and approval.
1532:
The concept for both the painting and physical form of the central villain Vigo went through many changes, including a plan to transform him into a large monstrosity.
411:
movies (beyond the first ten minutes of this one), but I'll try to do a thorough prose review. I might be slow over the weekend because I'm busy but I'll make time.
2729:"Ghostbusters: The Return (2004) was the first in a planned series of sequel novels before the publisher went out of business.' - is it worth adding the publisher?
1248:: this makes it sound as though these are real concepts. Perhaps "the audiences did not realize that the slime in the film could be either positive or negative"?
1808:
I changed this to "november" for now, the 28th date is accurate it is in the DVD liner, but I can't recall where it came from, a reference must have been moved.
1762:(seems to barely discuss II at all, and doesn't go into the production or mention Puttnam.) Likewise, it doesn't mention needing buy-in from the principals for
1439:
I don't know if it's common practice, I just consider random appearances by non primary performers to be cameos, but I've changed the word to "appearances by".
1030:
Definitely an improvement, though I think some prose tweaks could still be made. I've struck the oppose and will try to find time today to read through today.
1759:
2220:"In the courtroom, the slime sample reacts to the judge's angry outburst, releasing the ghosts of two brothers he sentenced to death." - this could be clearer
1603:
Why "only" mid-July? That's not in the source, and I don't see other dates in the discussion in our articles that make it apparent why we should say "only".
1271:
The ghost train was added to add a sense of an unseen force trying to keep the Ghostbusters away. The scene was filmed at the Tunnel night club in New York.
1297:
The film's final battle with Vigo was removed and replaced, and the way that Vigo was to exit the painting to confront the Ghostbusters changed completely.
688:
uncomfortable." "Substitute 'damn' every time you're inclined to write 'very'; your editor will delete it and the writing will be just as it should be." -
449:." The fact that it went through many variations should be obvious even if it's not stated. It's common knowledge that film scripts go through many drafts.
40:
1970:
1103:
How can it have been rushed into production if the dinner had to be followed with months of negotiations, which presumably had to precede production?
183:
cited; perhaps Darkwarriorblake couldn't get hold of it, or perhaps the contents weren't useful.) Am I misunderstanding your reason for opposition?
146:
with sources to that effect, which you appeared to rebuff and have not added. Given that those appear to be high-quality sources, I must oppose and
1299:
Suggest: "The film's final battle with Vigo was reshot, and the way that Vigo left the painting to confront the Ghostbusters changed completely."
2860:
2041:
Changed to "Raymond Stantz owns an occult bookstore and works a side job alongside Winston Zeddemore as unpopular children's entertainers. "
1764:
As co-creators, Reitman, Murray, Aykroyd, and Ramis all had control over the franchise, and their unanimous approval was required to proceed.
30:
17:
1584:. I see more imprecision here; it wasn't the overall quantity of films being released that was the issue, it was the unexpected successes.
1552:
1455:
Ray Parker, Jr. helped write an updated version of his hit song "Ghostbusters", which was co-written and performed by hip hop group Run-DMC.
2871:
2005:
1936:
1717:
1664:
1495:
1043:
1003:
393:
332:
236:
165:
2170:. Hopefully me reviewing this will get you to review one of the other four tropical cyclone related articles up for FAC (just not mine)
2001:
1932:
1713:
1660:
1491:
1039:
999:
1126:
Presumably this should be "...did not know..."? And "destructor" is a bit clumsy; can we just make it "...what form that would take"?
849:..." The two "add"s in such close proximity is a bit distracting, I think you can just chop off the second without losing any meaning
920:
874:
738:
622:
549:
491:
422:
709:
2890:
2850:
2826:
2810:
2794:
2778:
2764:
2744:
2720:
2687:
2649:
2625:
2601:
2577:
2553:
2525:
2510:"Max von Sydow provided the voice of Vigo the Carpathian." - you also have a period ending this, even though it's not a sentence
2501:
2472:
2448:
2418:
2402:
2371:
2355:
2330:
2302:
2278:
2252:
2236:
2192:
2151:
2138:
2118:
2106:
2078:
2049:
2009:
1982:
1940:
1918:
1897:
1881:
1816:
1796:
1782:
1732:
1721:
1690:
1668:
1633:
1615:
1596:
1563:
1517:
1499:
1468:
1447:
1429:
1407:
1388:
1362:
1337:
1312:
1287:
1261:
1236:
1211:
1186:
1161:
1139:
1114:
1096:
1064:
1047:
1025:
1007:
968:
952:
925:
879:
759:
743:
643:
627:
554:
529:
513:
496:
427:
397:
365:
353:
336:
240:
210:
192:
169:
109:
89:
1509:
You'll have to be more precise here, I looked at the last paragraph of music and all the sources seem fine with what is there.
1347:
Afterman offered Brown's music label, MCA Records, the lucrative rights to the soundtrack in exchange for Brown's participation
1588:"crunch", and the latter paragraph states that the summer season is barely over and there's this huge list of films incoming.
1324:
This seems out of place at the end of the Post-production section; was it added as a late idea? Is it even worth mentioning?
829:
be used when stating an objective fact. For example, "He noted it was raining" is OK, but "He noted the film was good" is not.
751:
Done. I like that Mark Twain quote. I put "July 4th Independence Day holiday weekend", I don't know if that's too unwieldy.
277:" is sufficient given that we already know that filming was in NYC. If there's doubt to the borough just say "on Manhattan's
1329:
I thought it was a nice nod to the individual responsible, but you're the second person to bring this up so I'll remove it.
197:
I went through every source given and included every one that had any relevant information. There's a giant section called
1977:
2699:"Others have analyzed the slime as a symbol of pollution." - see above, re: attribution. You can say who the "Others" are
905:
Just finished reading and there wasn't really anything significant that stood out to me. Consider this my declaration of
1074:
Reading through now; I'll make notes as I go through. Please revert any copyedits I make that you don't agree with.
1864:. While normally I wouldn't have an issue with performing that subtraction, 2410-1073 = 1337, not 1339 as asserted.
1171:
Reitman began working on Ghostbusters II almost immediately after concluding directing his comedy film Twins (1988).
604:"... with filming scheduled for Summer 1988 in anticipation of a mid-1989 release." "Summer" should be replaced per
2823:
2791:
2775:
2741:
2717:
2684:
2646:
2622:
2598:
2574:
2550:
2522:
2498:
2469:
2445:
2399:
2352:
2327:
2299:
2275:
2233:
2189:
2135:
2103:
2075:
2046:
2032:
Raymond Stantz owns an occult bookstore and works alongside Winston Zeddemore as unpopular children's entertainers.
1915:
1878:
1851:
1813:
1779:
1687:
1630:
1612:
1593:
1560:
1514:
1465:
1444:
1426:
1404:
1385:
1359:
1334:
1322:
Editor Sheldon Kahn was responsible for the idea of the "Five Years Later" opening credit at the start of the film.
1309:
1284:
1258:
1233:
1208:
1183:
1158:
1136:
1111:
1093:
1061:
1022:
965:
892:
756:
640:
510:
350:
207:
106:
86:
724:
the way that Vigo was to exit the painting to confront the Ghostbusters changed completely." Missing conjunction?
269:
2263:"Learning of Hardemeyer's actions" - this would be stronger if this paragraph was combined with the previous one
2114:
Everything else in the article looks good besides these issues that stuck out to me. Interesting article too. -
1963:
1354:
I've reworded this bit. It is difficult to rephrase a relatively short factoid in a drastically different way.
832:"He also noted that Murray's normally comedic indifference seemed to be lacking commitment." Again with "note".
825:"He noted that MacNicol and Moranis were the highlights of the film..." Incorrect use of "note". "Note" should
389:
328:
232:
161:
2322:", and their positivity weakens Vigo. He is forced to return to the painting and the Ghostbusters are freed."
1750:
2, 4, 5, 6, 9, 11, Eisenberg 1989 (refs 23, 76, 79), Mccabe 2016 (refs 19, 20, 24), 25, 81, 89, 156, and 166.
1148:
Suggest changing the section title "Cast and crew" to "Cast"; there's nothing about crew in there, is there?
2845:
2805:
2759:
2413:
2366:
2247:
1997:
1928:
1709:
1656:
1487:
1035:
995:
2705:"In 2009, Den of Geek listed it as one of the 25 best blockbuster sequels of all time"- what did it rank?
2098:
I removed the bit about the puppy, couldn't think how to reword it, as she is the subject not the puppy.
2819:
2787:
2771:
2737:
2713:
2680:
2642:
2618:
2594:
2570:
2546:
2518:
2494:
2465:
2441:
2395:
2348:
2323:
2295:
2271:
2229:
2185:
2131:
2099:
2071:
2042:
1989:
1911:
1874:
1847:
1809:
1775:
1683:
1626:
1608:
1589:
1581:
1556:
1510:
1461:
1440:
1422:
1400:
1381:
1355:
1330:
1305:
1280:
1254:
1229:
1204:
1179:
1154:
1132:
1107:
1089:
1057:
1018:
961:
939:
915:
888:
869:
752:
733:
636:
617:
544:
506:
486:
417:
346:
203:
102:
82:
2610:"Five remotely controlled baby strollers were used to create the "possessed" stroller" - why the quotes
1771:
1482:
a bit concerned by that last paragraph. The sourcing is not completely wrong, but it feels imprecise.
859:"The reviewer noted that Murray is central to the film because of his ad-libbed dialog." Another "note"
302:, but I don't think that's needed. Any material likely to become dated should, however, be marked with
2287:"The ghostbusters abseil through the ceiling" - I'm not familiar w that verb, and so might other users
811:"... makes it the eighth-highest-grossing film worldwide of 1989..." Same as I said before in the lede
1371:
That made me take a closer look at sourcing for that paragraph, and I have a couple more concerns:
987:
385:
362:
324:
228:
188:
177:
157:
2489:
2059:
Vigo orders Janosz to bring him a child to possess, allowing him to live again and rule the world.
2886:
2840:
2815:
2800:
2783:
2754:
2569:
Only Hudson is present in the particular shot being discussed. I've elaborated this point a bit.
2408:
2361:
2242:
2148:
2128:
2115:
1993:
1952:
1924:
1903:
1705:
1679:
1652:
1483:
1053:
1031:
1014:
991:
1418:
a cameo but the source only says he asked for a role -- perhaps he asked for more than a cameo.
1088:
Changed to "meeting", it doesn't specify what time of day it was and what meal was being eaten.
225:
for a further look and accept my apologies for any offense you might have taken from the above.
948:
290:
should include a conversion to metric; ditto to any other units that don't currently have one.
132:
2864:
1907:
1892:
1871:
1727:
1701:
910:
864:
728:
612:
539:
526:
481:
412:
319:
A lot of the images have empty alt texts; this needs to be fixed for accessibility purposes.
294:
61:
1173:
That "(1988)" is ugly and seems unnecesary. And can we rephrase to avoid "...ing ...ing"?
794:)..." I'm just bolding because I'm pretty sure this article is written in American English
656:
and provide a contrast..." I'm a huge fan of the Oxford comma, but it's fine if you aren't.
538:
Don't worry, I haven't forgotten. Just busy—will get to more soon (and this is a promise).
2167:
198:
72:
2433:
suggested Ghostbusters was part of former Columbia executive Frank Price's legacy" - who?
2863:
has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see
585:
film had been developed as a stand-alone project." Just some copyediting that could help
2319:
702:
306:
257:
184:
153:
1527:
I decided to pick a couple more sentences and random and take a look at the sourcing.
1414:
Then we have "Brown agreed on the condition he would receive a cameo in the film"; he
2882:
278:
274:
53:
2712:
Changed. They've changed their site design but I'd swear they were unranked before.
2034:
Does Zeddemore and Stantz both own the bookstore, or just Stantz? Elaborate further.
944:
463:
2658:"MacNicol's performance was consistently praised for his performance." - redundant
1221:
Medjuck said the test screenings identified that audiences liked the film but felt
938:. I did an extensive review of the prose in the last FAC and worked closely with
1861:
1792:
1763:
1755:
2878:
2593:
It just establishes scale between the real thing and the larger-than-life copy.
2208:
Changed to "As the sequel to the then-highest-grossing comedy film of all time,
698:
concluded on March 7, 1989." I don't think anyone will assume it was unofficial.
605:
299:
152:(I messed that up incredibly, see below.) On an unrelated note, there should be
57:
2318:
Changed to " The collective crowds gathered outside begin singing a chorus of "
1380:
Got rid of "peak". I might try to find a 1989 source later but it isn't vital.
2028:
There is a period between "family-friendly" and "although" instead of a comma.
689:
1153:
Done, I think it used to have crew info in it but that was moved elsehwere.
265:
2586:" which was too small to let the Ghostbusters peer out" - is this relevant?
1846:
Just an oversight, the divider on that page is after the text being cited.
1246:
the audiences were not aware of the concepts of positive and negative slime
1800:
1537:
1399:
I'm gonna be honest, I'm a bit confused with this one. Can you elaborate?
1085:
Was it a lunch or a dinner? For many readers these are not synonyms.
684:"Freezing temperatures combined with the liquid slime made the actors
462:"... making it the eighth-highest-grossing film of the year." Link to
588:"Columbia had experienced a long series of box-office failures since
445:"As with the first film, Aykroyd and Ramis collaborated on the script
2488:
There isn't much information that I can find regarding pre-Puttnam.
801:"Dane revised the designs of the proton pack weapons, the ghost trap
39:
Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in
1793:
Principal photography began on November 28, 1988, in New York City.
284:"Los Angeles, California" should just be "Los Angeles" per the MoS
808:
and also revised the Ectomobile, which became the Ectomobile 1A."
1841:
Ref 19 points to page 60 but most of the content is on page 61.
787:
and blue." I think this would just read better with parentheses.
2534:"Soundtrack producer Peter Afterman wanted to hire Bobby Brown
1196:
realized there were issues with the film that had to be changed
822:." "Upon release" or "on release" is redundant 99% of the time
790:"The film required approximately 100,000 US gallons (380,000
720:"The film's final battle with Vigo was removed and replaced,
1576:
returns to play Batman and Lethal Weapon 2 on other screens.
2347:
I added (top row) and (bottom row). Is that what you mean?
652:"He wanted to eschew New York City, set the film overseas
2174:
Something is up in the infobox when it says "Characters
1829:
article, which is just a photo spread and has no text.
1747:
65:
2382:"Puttnam had publicly criticized Murray for allegedly
1803:
doesn't support the specific November 28 date either.
601:
was seen as the best way of reversing their fortunes."
137:
Unfortunately, I do not believe I can do anything but
2091:
is the girl or the puppy part of Egon's experiments?
1962:
your oppose, btw, just a commment on the mechanics.
1923:
I'd like to hear David's comments on what he found.
779:"Food coloring was added; the colors included green
156:between such figures as "$ 215.4 million", etc. –
2898:The above discussion is preserved as an archive.
1862:Although the sequel played on 1,073 more screens
141:this nomination at this time. It appears you had
1726:I can try and take a look tomorrow or Thursday.
252:review (I still intend to take WikiCup points):
705:at the beginning of the post-production section
43:. No further edits should be made to this page.
407:Imma skip the plot, since I've never seen the
2904:No further edits should be made to this page.
2877:template in place on the talk page until the
2818:, I've addressed the last few issues raised.
2023:In the lead's third paragraph is this quote:
863:Almost there. Should be done by the weekend.
29:The following is an archived discussion of a
8:
887:Done. Hard to find other words than "said".
673:"... was restricted because of the visit of
260:for such figures as "$ 215.4 million", etc.
150:of this FAC to work on their incorporation.
2538:a recent succession of hit songs." - what?
1758:does not appear to be adequately cited to
1678:I do hope you will give it another chance
909:. Now I just need to go watch the movies.
432:
119:
41:Knowledge talk:Featured article candidates
2384:taking from Hollywood without giving back
1770:That statement seems to be referenced to
1746:I went through statements attributed to
856:and singled out MacNicol's performance."
435:
122:
2087:
2058:
2031:
2024:
1574:
1551:The second part comes from page 45 of
1531:
1454:
1374:
1346:
1321:
1296:
1270:
1245:
1220:
1195:
1170:
1123:
1078:
287:
263:
1017:, please let me know what you think.
18:Knowledge:Featured article candidates
7:
1834:Changed to 6-8, numbering oversight.
818:received generally negative reviews
447:, which went through many variations
97:This article is about the 1989 film
2143:Awesome; you addressed the issues.
845:"... and the addition of an infant
464:1989_in_film#Highest-grossing_films
798:, but "litres" is British English.
24:
1013:I've reworked the entire section
842:felt did not work." Clarification
835:"... genuine human warmth, which
710:Independence Day (United States)
681:." I just think this flows nicer
143:a bit of a spat with Laser brain
2340:even though it's not a sentence
1825:Ref 79 points to page 8 of the
1772:this, which is classed as ref 8
1536:The first clause is sourced to
256:As said above, there should be
2464:Reworked the section for this
567:"After the massive success of
1:
2178:by Dan Aykroyd Harold Ramis"
1799:and the additional reference
1008:11:08, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
969:23:33, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
953:20:47, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
926:20:00, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
880:23:38, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
760:19:27, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
744:02:31, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
644:22:12, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
628:12:48, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
555:20:28, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
530:23:33, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
398:04:01, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
366:23:33, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
131:(DISCLAIMER:I intend to take
679:, leader of the Soviet Union
514:00:21, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
497:20:37, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
428:20:27, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
354:00:21, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
337:21:16, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
241:19:18, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
211:19:16, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
193:19:13, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
170:06:11, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
110:19:20, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
90:19:20, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
2872:featured article candidates
2166:I came here from my FAC on
2018:Comments from NowIsntItTime
1396:no additional information.
977:Comments from Mike Christie
768:"wanted to hire Bobby Brown
670:." Just for some formality.
380:This looks okay to me now.
115:Support from John M Wolfson
31:featured article nomination
2921:
2891:12:16, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
2851:14:15, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
2827:20:01, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
2811:14:31, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
2795:13:34, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
2745:13:34, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
2721:13:34, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
2688:13:34, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
2650:13:34, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
2626:13:34, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
2602:13:34, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
2578:13:34, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
2554:13:34, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
2526:13:34, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
2502:23:54, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
2473:23:54, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
2449:13:34, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
2419:14:31, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
2403:13:34, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
2372:14:31, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
2356:13:34, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
2331:13:34, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
2303:13:34, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
2279:13:34, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
2253:14:31, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
2237:13:34, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
2193:13:34, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
2162:Support from Hurricanehink
2152:22:26, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
2139:19:25, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
2119:23:24, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
2107:19:25, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
2079:19:25, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
2050:19:25, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
1941:21:11, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
1919:18:34, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
1898:00:55, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
1882:00:17, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
1817:00:17, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
1783:08:56, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
1733:01:34, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
1722:21:00, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
1691:19:15, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
1669:10:05, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
1634:19:15, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
1616:19:15, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
1597:19:15, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
1564:19:15, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
1518:19:15, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
1500:21:01, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
1469:19:15, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
1448:19:15, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
1430:19:15, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
1408:19:15, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
1389:19:15, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
1363:19:15, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
1338:19:15, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
1313:19:15, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
1288:19:15, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
1262:19:15, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
1237:19:15, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
1212:19:15, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
1187:19:15, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
1162:19:15, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
1140:19:15, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
1115:19:15, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
1097:19:15, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
1065:22:19, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
796:(aka a real man's English)
675:leader of the Soviet Union
659:"He chose to avoid making
571:, a sequel was considered
135:points from this review.)
2779:21:29, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
2765:20:50, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
2440:Removed the others part.
2010:16:19, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
1983:13:56, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
1894:Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs
1795:does not appear cited to
1729:Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs
1082:A couple of things here.
1048:11:27, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
1026:10:20, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
403:Comments from TheJoebro64
2901:Please do not modify it.
1625:Changed to one theater.
1056:, gentle ping reminder.
288:100,000 gallons of slime
36:Please do not modify it.
459:the performances of..."
2824:SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE!
2792:SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE!
2776:SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE!
2742:SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE!
2718:SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE!
2685:SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE!
2647:SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE!
2623:SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE!
2599:SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE!
2575:SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE!
2551:SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE!
2523:SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE!
2499:SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE!
2470:SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE!
2446:SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE!
2400:SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE!
2353:SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE!
2328:SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE!
2300:SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE!
2276:SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE!
2234:SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE!
2190:SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE!
2136:SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE!
2104:SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE!
2076:SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE!
2047:SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE!
1916:SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE!
1879:SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE!
1852:SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE!
1814:SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE!
1780:SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE!
1688:SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE!
1631:SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE!
1613:SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE!
1594:SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE!
1561:SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE!
1515:SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE!
1466:SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE!
1445:SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE!
1427:SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE!
1405:SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE!
1386:SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE!
1360:SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE!
1335:SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE!
1310:SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE!
1285:SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE!
1259:SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE!
1234:SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE!
1209:SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE!
1184:SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE!
1159:SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE!
1137:SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE!
1112:SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE!
1094:SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE!
1062:SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE!
1023:SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE!
966:SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE!
893:SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE!
757:SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE!
666:until he returned for
641:SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE!
511:SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE!
505:films soon Joe, jeez.
351:SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE!
323:That's all for now. –
208:SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE!
107:SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE!
87:SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE!
2386:." - I don't get this
1949:(Uninvolved comment)
931:Comments from Indrian
2294:Changed to "rappel"
1274:of "added to add".)
852:"... of the original
437:Whole lotta comments
1580:This is sourced to
221:Consider my oppose
199:"Thematic analysis"
2665:Good eye, removed.
1421:Changed to "role"
148:suggest withdrawal
2848:
2808:
2762:
2416:
2369:
2250:
1480:looks OK so far.
1478:-- More to come;
918:
913:
902:
901:
872:
867:
736:
731:
677:Mikhail Gorbachev
620:
615:
611:More later today
547:
542:
489:
484:
420:
415:
377:
376:
93:
2912:
2903:
2876:
2870:
2867:, and leave the
2844:
2820:Darkwarriorblake
2804:
2788:Darkwarriorblake
2772:Darkwarriorblake
2758:
2738:Darkwarriorblake
2714:Darkwarriorblake
2681:Darkwarriorblake
2643:Darkwarriorblake
2641:Added "opening"
2619:Darkwarriorblake
2595:Darkwarriorblake
2571:Darkwarriorblake
2547:Darkwarriorblake
2519:Darkwarriorblake
2495:Darkwarriorblake
2466:Darkwarriorblake
2442:Darkwarriorblake
2412:
2396:Darkwarriorblake
2365:
2349:Darkwarriorblake
2324:Darkwarriorblake
2296:Darkwarriorblake
2272:Darkwarriorblake
2246:
2230:Darkwarriorblake
2186:Darkwarriorblake
2132:Darkwarriorblake
2100:Darkwarriorblake
2072:Darkwarriorblake
2043:Darkwarriorblake
1990:Darkwarriorblake
1980:
1975:
1968:
1956:
1912:Darkwarriorblake
1895:
1875:Darkwarriorblake
1863:
1848:Darkwarriorblake
1810:Darkwarriorblake
1794:
1776:Darkwarriorblake
1765:
1757:
1730:
1684:Darkwarriorblake
1627:Darkwarriorblake
1609:Darkwarriorblake
1590:Darkwarriorblake
1557:Darkwarriorblake
1511:Darkwarriorblake
1462:Darkwarriorblake
1441:Darkwarriorblake
1423:Darkwarriorblake
1401:Darkwarriorblake
1382:Darkwarriorblake
1356:Darkwarriorblake
1331:Darkwarriorblake
1306:Darkwarriorblake
1281:Darkwarriorblake
1255:Darkwarriorblake
1230:Darkwarriorblake
1205:Darkwarriorblake
1180:Darkwarriorblake
1155:Darkwarriorblake
1133:Darkwarriorblake
1108:Darkwarriorblake
1090:Darkwarriorblake
1058:Darkwarriorblake
1019:Darkwarriorblake
962:Darkwarriorblake
960:Thanks Indrian.
940:Darkwarriorblake
923:
916:
911:
889:Darkwarriorblake
877:
870:
865:
797:
753:Darkwarriorblake
741:
734:
729:
708:Perhaps link to
637:Darkwarriorblake
635:Done, thanks JB.
625:
618:
613:
573:an inevitability
552:
545:
540:
507:Darkwarriorblake
494:
487:
482:
433:
425:
418:
413:
347:Darkwarriorblake
311:
305:
248:Okay, here's my
204:Darkwarriorblake
181:
120:
103:Darkwarriorblake
83:Darkwarriorblake
79:
64:) 14 April 2020
48:The article was
38:
2920:
2919:
2915:
2914:
2913:
2911:
2910:
2909:
2908:
2899:
2874:
2868:
2407:That's fair. ♫
2360:Yup, thanks! ♫
2241:Much better. ♫
2168:Cyclone Chapala
2164:
2020:
1978:
1971:
1964:
1950:
1893:
1728:
979:
933:
921:
903:
875:
816:Ghostbusters II
795:
783:to match Slimer
739:
714:Ghostbusters II
623:
599:Ghostbusters II
550:
492:
469:"Although some
438:
423:
405:
378:
309:
303:
175:
125:
117:
99:Ghostbusters II
76:
73:Ghostbusters II
34:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
2918:
2916:
2907:
2906:
2894:
2893:
2881:goes through.
2836:
2835:
2834:
2833:
2832:
2831:
2830:
2829:
2750:
2749:
2748:
2747:
2731:
2730:
2726:
2725:
2724:
2723:
2707:
2706:
2703:
2700:
2697:
2693:
2692:
2691:
2690:
2674:
2673:
2669:
2668:
2667:
2666:
2660:
2659:
2655:
2654:
2653:
2652:
2636:
2635:
2631:
2630:
2629:
2628:
2612:
2611:
2607:
2606:
2605:
2604:
2588:
2587:
2583:
2582:
2581:
2580:
2564:
2563:
2559:
2558:
2557:
2556:
2540:
2539:
2531:
2530:
2529:
2528:
2512:
2511:
2507:
2506:
2505:
2504:
2483:
2482:
2478:
2477:
2476:
2475:
2459:
2458:
2454:
2453:
2452:
2451:
2435:
2434:
2426:
2425:
2424:
2423:
2422:
2421:
2388:
2387:
2379:
2378:
2377:
2376:
2375:
2374:
2342:
2341:
2336:
2335:
2334:
2333:
2320:Auld Lang Syne
2313:
2312:
2308:
2307:
2306:
2305:
2289:
2288:
2284:
2283:
2282:
2281:
2265:
2264:
2260:
2259:
2258:
2257:
2256:
2255:
2222:
2221:
2217:
2216:
2215:
2214:
2210:GhostbustersII
2203:
2202:
2198:
2197:
2196:
2195:
2176:
2175:
2163:
2160:
2159:
2158:
2157:
2156:
2155:
2154:
2112:
2111:
2110:
2109:
2093:
2092:
2084:
2083:
2082:
2081:
2064:
2063:
2055:
2054:
2053:
2052:
2036:
2035:
2029:
2019:
2016:
2015:
2014:
2013:
2012:
1946:
1945:
1944:
1943:
1889:
1888:
1887:
1886:
1885:
1884:
1858:
1857:
1856:
1855:
1854:
1839:
1838:
1837:
1836:
1835:
1823:
1822:
1821:
1820:
1819:
1789:
1788:
1787:
1786:
1785:
1744:
1743:
1742:
1741:
1740:
1739:
1738:
1737:
1736:
1735:
1697:
1641:
1640:
1639:
1638:
1637:
1636:
1620:
1619:
1618:
1601:
1600:
1599:
1571:
1570:
1569:
1568:
1567:
1566:
1544:
1543:
1542:
1541:
1525:
1524:
1523:
1522:
1521:
1520:
1476:
1475:
1474:
1473:
1472:
1471:
1452:
1451:
1450:
1434:
1433:
1432:
1412:
1411:
1410:
1393:
1392:
1391:
1369:
1368:
1367:
1366:
1365:
1344:
1343:
1342:
1341:
1340:
1319:
1318:
1317:
1316:
1315:
1294:
1293:
1292:
1291:
1290:
1268:
1267:
1266:
1265:
1264:
1243:
1242:
1241:
1240:
1239:
1218:
1217:
1216:
1215:
1214:
1193:
1192:
1191:
1190:
1189:
1168:
1167:
1166:
1165:
1164:
1146:
1145:
1144:
1143:
1142:
1121:
1120:
1119:
1118:
1117:
1101:
1100:
1099:
1072:
1071:
1070:
1069:
1068:
1067:
978:
975:
974:
973:
972:
971:
932:
929:
900:
899:
898:
897:
896:
895:
861:
860:
857:
850:
847:to add novelty
843:
833:
830:
823:
812:
809:
799:
788:
777:
765:
764:
763:
762:
726:
725:
718:
706:
703:test screening
699:
692:
682:
671:
657:
649:
648:
647:
646:
609:
608:
602:
586:
564:
563:
562:
561:
560:
559:
558:
557:
533:
532:
519:
518:
517:
516:
478:
477:
467:
460:
453:
450:
440:
439:
436:
431:
404:
401:
386:John M Wolfson
375:
374:
373:
372:
371:
370:
369:
368:
363:John M Wolfson
357:
356:
325:John M Wolfson
321:
320:
317:
313:
291:
285:
282:
273:I believe "on
261:
251:
246:
245:
244:
243:
229:John M Wolfson
214:
213:
195:
178:John M Wolfson
158:John M Wolfson
127:
126:
123:
118:
116:
113:
95:
94:
81:Nominator(s):
75:
70:
69:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2917:
2905:
2902:
2896:
2895:
2892:
2888:
2884:
2880:
2873:
2866:
2862:
2858:
2855:
2854:
2853:
2852:
2847:
2842:
2841:Hurricanehink
2828:
2825:
2821:
2817:
2816:Hurricanehink
2814:
2813:
2812:
2807:
2802:
2801:Hurricanehink
2798:
2797:
2796:
2793:
2789:
2785:
2784:Hurricanehink
2782:
2781:
2780:
2777:
2773:
2769:
2768:
2767:
2766:
2761:
2756:
2755:Hurricanehink
2746:
2743:
2739:
2735:
2734:
2733:
2732:
2728:
2727:
2722:
2719:
2715:
2711:
2710:
2709:
2708:
2704:
2701:
2698:
2695:
2694:
2689:
2686:
2682:
2678:
2677:
2676:
2675:
2671:
2670:
2664:
2663:
2662:
2661:
2657:
2656:
2651:
2648:
2644:
2640:
2639:
2638:
2637:
2633:
2632:
2627:
2624:
2620:
2616:
2615:
2614:
2613:
2609:
2608:
2603:
2600:
2596:
2592:
2591:
2590:
2589:
2585:
2584:
2579:
2576:
2572:
2568:
2567:
2566:
2565:
2561:
2560:
2555:
2552:
2548:
2544:
2543:
2542:
2541:
2537:
2533:
2532:
2527:
2524:
2520:
2516:
2515:
2514:
2513:
2509:
2508:
2503:
2500:
2496:
2491:
2487:
2486:
2485:
2484:
2480:
2479:
2474:
2471:
2467:
2463:
2462:
2461:
2460:
2456:
2455:
2450:
2447:
2443:
2439:
2438:
2437:
2436:
2432:
2428:
2427:
2420:
2415:
2410:
2409:Hurricanehink
2406:
2405:
2404:
2401:
2397:
2392:
2391:
2390:
2389:
2385:
2381:
2380:
2373:
2368:
2363:
2362:Hurricanehink
2359:
2358:
2357:
2354:
2350:
2346:
2345:
2344:
2343:
2338:
2337:
2332:
2329:
2325:
2321:
2317:
2316:
2315:
2314:
2310:
2309:
2304:
2301:
2297:
2293:
2292:
2291:
2290:
2286:
2285:
2280:
2277:
2273:
2269:
2268:
2267:
2266:
2262:
2261:
2254:
2249:
2244:
2243:Hurricanehink
2240:
2239:
2238:
2235:
2231:
2226:
2225:
2224:
2223:
2219:
2218:
2211:
2207:
2206:
2205:
2204:
2200:
2199:
2194:
2191:
2187:
2183:
2182:
2181:
2180:
2179:
2173:
2172:
2171:
2169:
2161:
2153:
2150:
2149:NowIsntItTime
2146:
2142:
2141:
2140:
2137:
2133:
2130:
2129:NowIsntItTime
2125:
2124:
2123:
2122:
2121:
2120:
2117:
2116:NowIsntItTime
2108:
2105:
2101:
2097:
2096:
2095:
2094:
2090:
2086:
2085:
2080:
2077:
2073:
2068:
2067:
2066:
2065:
2060:
2057:
2056:
2051:
2048:
2044:
2040:
2039:
2038:
2037:
2033:
2030:
2027:
2022:
2021:
2017:
2011:
2007:
2003:
1999:
1995:
1994:Mike Christie
1991:
1986:
1985:
1984:
1981:
1976:
1974:
1969:
1967:
1961:
1954:
1953:Mike Christie
1948:
1947:
1942:
1938:
1934:
1930:
1926:
1925:Mike Christie
1922:
1921:
1920:
1917:
1913:
1909:
1905:
1904:Mike Christie
1902:
1901:
1900:
1899:
1896:
1883:
1880:
1876:
1873:
1868:
1867:
1866:
1865:
1859:
1853:
1849:
1845:
1844:
1843:
1842:
1840:
1833:
1832:
1831:
1830:
1828:
1824:
1818:
1815:
1811:
1807:
1806:
1805:
1804:
1802:
1798:
1790:
1784:
1781:
1777:
1773:
1769:
1768:
1767:
1766:
1761:
1753:
1752:
1751:
1749:
1734:
1731:
1725:
1724:
1723:
1719:
1715:
1711:
1707:
1706:Mike Christie
1703:
1698:
1694:
1693:
1692:
1689:
1685:
1681:
1680:Mike Christie
1677:
1676:
1675:
1674:
1673:
1672:
1671:
1670:
1666:
1662:
1658:
1654:
1653:Mike Christie
1650:
1649:
1646:
1635:
1632:
1628:
1624:
1623:
1621:
1617:
1614:
1610:
1605:
1604:
1602:
1598:
1595:
1591:
1586:
1585:
1583:
1579:
1578:
1577:
1573:
1572:
1565:
1562:
1558:
1554:
1550:
1549:
1548:
1547:
1546:
1545:
1539:
1535:
1534:
1533:
1530:
1529:
1528:
1519:
1516:
1512:
1508:
1507:
1506:
1505:
1504:
1503:
1502:
1501:
1497:
1493:
1489:
1485:
1484:Mike Christie
1481:
1470:
1467:
1463:
1459:
1458:
1456:
1453:
1449:
1446:
1442:
1438:
1437:
1435:
1431:
1428:
1424:
1420:
1419:
1417:
1413:
1409:
1406:
1402:
1398:
1397:
1394:
1390:
1387:
1383:
1379:
1378:
1376:
1373:
1372:
1370:
1364:
1361:
1357:
1353:
1352:
1351:
1350:
1348:
1345:
1339:
1336:
1332:
1328:
1327:
1326:
1325:
1323:
1320:
1314:
1311:
1307:
1303:
1302:
1301:
1300:
1298:
1295:
1289:
1286:
1282:
1278:
1277:
1276:
1275:
1272:
1269:
1263:
1260:
1256:
1252:
1251:
1250:
1249:
1247:
1244:
1238:
1235:
1231:
1227:
1226:
1225:
1224:
1222:
1219:
1213:
1210:
1206:
1202:
1201:
1200:
1199:
1197:
1194:
1188:
1185:
1181:
1177:
1176:
1175:
1174:
1172:
1169:
1163:
1160:
1156:
1152:
1151:
1150:
1149:
1147:
1141:
1138:
1134:
1130:
1129:
1128:
1127:
1125:
1122:
1116:
1113:
1109:
1105:
1104:
1102:
1098:
1095:
1091:
1087:
1086:
1084:
1083:
1081:
1077:
1076:
1075:
1066:
1063:
1059:
1055:
1054:Mike_Christie
1051:
1050:
1049:
1045:
1041:
1037:
1033:
1032:Mike Christie
1029:
1028:
1027:
1024:
1020:
1016:
1015:Mike Christie
1012:
1011:
1010:
1009:
1005:
1001:
997:
993:
992:Mike Christie
989:
985:
984:
976:
970:
967:
963:
959:
958:
957:
956:
955:
954:
950:
946:
941:
937:
930:
928:
927:
924:
919:
914:
908:
894:
890:
886:
885:
884:
883:
882:
881:
878:
873:
868:
858:
855:
851:
848:
844:
841:
838:
834:
831:
828:
824:
821:
817:
813:
810:
807:
804:
800:
793:
789:
786:
782:
778:
775:
771:
767:
766:
761:
758:
754:
750:
749:
748:
747:
746:
745:
742:
737:
732:
723:
719:
717:significance.
715:
711:
707:
704:
700:
697:
693:
691:
687:
683:
680:
676:
672:
669:
665:
662:
658:
655:
651:
650:
645:
642:
638:
634:
633:
632:
631:
630:
629:
626:
621:
616:
607:
603:
600:
597:
594:
591:
587:
584:
581:
577:
574:
570:
566:
565:
556:
553:
548:
543:
537:
536:
535:
534:
531:
528:
525:
524:
523:
522:
521:
520:
515:
512:
508:
503:
502:
501:
500:
499:
498:
495:
490:
485:
475:
474:retrospective
472:
468:
465:
461:
458:
454:
451:
448:
444:
443:
442:
441:
434:
430:
429:
426:
421:
416:
410:
402:
400:
399:
395:
391:
387:
383:
367:
364:
361:
360:
359:
358:
355:
352:
348:
343:
342:
341:
340:
339:
338:
334:
330:
326:
318:
314:
308:
301:
298:specific per
296:
293:I agree with
292:
289:
286:
283:
280:
279:Second Avenue
276:
275:Second Avenue
272:
271:
270:Second Avenue
267:
262:
259:
255:
254:
253:
249:
242:
238:
234:
230:
226:
224:
218:
217:
216:
215:
212:
209:
205:
200:
196:
194:
190:
186:
179:
174:
173:
172:
171:
167:
163:
159:
155:
151:
149:
144:
140:
134:
129:
128:
121:
114:
112:
111:
108:
104:
100:
92:
91:
88:
84:
78:
77:
74:
71:
68:
66:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
37:
32:
27:
26:
19:
2900:
2897:
2857:Closing note
2856:
2837:
2751:
2536:who had, had
2535:
2490:Guy McElwain
2430:
2383:
2209:
2177:
2165:
2144:
2113:
1972:
1965:
1959:
1890:
1826:
1748:current refs
1745:
1647:
1644:
1643:
1642:
1526:
1479:
1477:
1415:
1073:
988:WP:RECEPTION
982:
981:
980:
935:
934:
906:
904:
862:
853:
846:
839:
836:
826:
819:
815:
805:
802:
791:
784:
780:
776:a recent..."
773:
769:
727:
721:
713:
695:
685:
678:
674:
667:
663:
660:
653:
610:
598:
595:
592:
590:Ghostbusters
589:
582:
579:
578:even though
575:
572:
569:Ghostbusters
568:
479:
473:
471:contemporary
470:
456:
446:
409:Ghostbusters
408:
406:
381:
379:
322:
247:
222:
220:
185:Josh Milburn
147:
138:
136:
130:
98:
96:
80:
49:
47:
35:
28:
2089:experiments
1908:David Fuchs
1872:David Fuchs
1702:David Fuchs
1648:Weak oppose
606:MOS:SEASONS
527:TheJoebro64
480:More soon.
300:MOS:CURRENT
295:TheJoebro64
124:My comments
820:on release
696:officially
690:Mark Twain
576:inevitable
312:templates.
268:borough's
2865:WP:FAC/ar
2861:candidate
2184:Removed.
694:"Filming
266:Manhattan
223:suspended
2883:Ian Rose
2859:: This
2617:Removed
2002:contribs
1933:contribs
1714:contribs
1661:contribs
1553:this pdf
1492:contribs
1080:profits.
1040:contribs
1000:contribs
772:who had
701:Link to
668:Scrooged
457:although
394:contribs
333:contribs
237:contribs
166:contribs
54:Ian Rose
50:promoted
2145:Support
2026:praise.
2006:library
1937:library
1827:Cinefex
1718:library
1696:manage.
1665:library
1607:though.
1496:library
1044:library
1004:library
945:Indrian
936:Support
907:support
382:Support
264:on the
133:WikiCup
2431:Others
2213:year."
1791:Text:
1754:Text:
1645:Oppose
983:Oppose
840:Thomas
792:litres
661:movies
139:oppose
58:FACBot
2736:Done
2679:Done
2545:Done
2517:Done
2270:Done
2062:feat.
1979:54129
1304:Done
1279:Done
1228:Done
1203:Done.
1178:Done
1131:Done
1052:Hola
664:films
307:As of
258:NBSPs
154:NBSPs
16:<
2887:talk
2846:talk
2806:talk
2760:talk
2414:talk
2367:talk
2248:talk
1998:talk
1929:talk
1710:talk
1657:talk
1582:this
1538:this
1488:talk
1253:Done
1036:talk
996:talk
949:talk
827:only
712:at "
686:very
580:that
390:talk
384:. –
329:talk
250:real
233:talk
189:talk
162:talk
62:talk
56:via
2879:bot
2849:)
2809:)
2763:)
2417:)
2370:)
2251:)
2147:. -
2004:-
1935:-
1716:-
1663:-
1494:-
1416:got
1042:-
1002:-
917:BRO
912:JOE
871:BRO
866:JOE
774:had
735:BRO
730:JOE
722:and
619:BRO
614:JOE
596:and
583:the
546:BRO
541:JOE
488:BRO
483:JOE
419:BRO
414:JOE
316:it.
52:by
2889:)
2875:}}
2869:{{
2822:/
2790:/
2774:/
2740:/
2716:/
2683:/
2645:/
2621:/
2597:/
2573:/
2549:/
2521:/
2497:/
2468:/
2444:/
2398:/
2351:/
2326:/
2298:/
2274:/
2232:/
2188:/
2134:/
2102:/
2074:/
2045:/
2008:)
2000:-
1973:SN
1966:——
1960:on
1939:)
1931:-
1914:/
1910:?
1906:,
1891:--
1877:/
1850:/
1812:/
1801:11
1778:/
1720:)
1712:-
1686:/
1667:)
1659:-
1629:/
1611:/
1592:/
1559:/
1513:/
1498:)
1490:-
1464:/
1443:/
1425:/
1403:/
1384:/
1358:/
1333:/
1308:/
1283:/
1257:/
1232:/
1207:/
1182:/
1157:/
1135:/
1110:/
1092:/
1060:/
1046:)
1038:-
1021:/
1006:)
998:-
964:/
951:)
922:64
891:/
876:64
837:he
755:/
740:64
639:/
624:64
551:64
509:/
493:64
424:64
396:)
392:•
349:/
335:)
331:•
310:}}
304:{{
281:".
239:)
235:•
227:–
206:/
191:)
168:)
164:•
105:/
101:.
85:/
67:.
33:.
2885:(
2843:(
2803:(
2757:(
2429:"
2411:(
2364:(
2245:(
1996:(
1955::
1951:@
1927:(
1797:6
1760:4
1708:(
1655:(
1486:(
1034:(
994:(
947:(
854:,
814:"
806:,
803:;
785:)
781:(
770:,
654:,
593:,
466:?
388:(
327:(
231:(
187:(
180::
176:@
160:(
60:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.