Knowledge:Featured article candidates/Dragon: The Bruce Lee Story/archive1

2223:

from his time as a film and stage actor circa 1930s. At least one of these posters features the name 'Lee Hoi-chuen' on it quite prominently. It also shows a close-up of Bruce's birth certificate, which according to Cohen, is an exact replica of the original. I wasn't able to zoom in on my small laptop, but I'm sure Lee Hoi-chuen's name appears in the fine print of that certificate. In the directors commentary Cohen also explicitly refers to Lee Hoi-chuen by name and states the character is based on him, whereas in the commentary he also mentions Johnny has been fictionalised from Wong Jack Man. I think it's definitely best to refer to the character as 'Bruce's father' in the cast section as that is how he officially appears, though I also think that considering what I've mentioned that that link is piped to Lee Hoi-chuen.

880:

story. The fact that I liked reading the article and learned from it seems a good sign for what Knowledge is trying to do. Since I am not an expert on this film, I should emphasize that I am not the best to speak to whether or not the page is comprehensive of the literature, but I think the perspective of a non-expert can be useful for gauging how another such person would understand the article. I made a few tweaks and copyedits before writing these comments; feel free to revert any of them that you disagree with. I don't pretend to be an expert on all of Knowledge's guidelines or on writing itself. I have some initial questions and comments; it is possible I might have more thoughts later.

1667:: Thanks for bearing with me. I tried to keep any edits to the page minor. As already stated, feel free to modify or inquire about any edit I made. It is possible I may have missed something or you might have a different view on something. I think I am close to supporting the article for promotion. In the interest of getting the page up to the highest possible quality, I wanted to be as thorough as possible in my full comments. I enjoyed the page further on my second readthrough. Let me know what you think. 3016:

by first names. Despite this, the guideline also says we should always use a last name "when referring to the person who is the subject of the article", except in cases in which it is unclear to which person we are referring (then use the first name). I suppose it is arguable whether Bruce is the "subject" of the article in this case. The page indicates this guideline applies to straight biography articles and biographical content in other articles.

2491:. I'm thinking it would be much better to wikilink 'some evidence' to the sub-section at that article, rathern than trying to paraphrase a complicated issue into a couple sentences (or completely blow out the section of this article by going into far too much detail in order to cover all angles. And yes, I know the sub-section at that article isn't fantastically written or referenced, but that's neither here nor there in terms of the nomination for 133:) has a chapter that has analysis on the film, and I was wondering if it would be helpful for the article? It may also be helpful to add some type of descriptive phrase in front of Meaghan Morris and Zheng Zhu to give the reader a better understanding of them. Please ping me if I have not put up further comments by Sunday. 2208:

that in the context of the film, the character of the father may not be necessarily meant to represent Lee Hoi-chuen specifically, similar to the character of Johnny Sun and the real man he's loosely based on. I would be inclined to describe him as Bruce's father and remove the wikilink in the Plot and Cast sections.

3015:

advise that the first mention of a person should use their first and last name, and subsequent references should use their last name only. The exception for subsequent mentions seems to be that when people have the same last name within an article (which clearly applies here), we should refer to them

2683:

Yes. It looks exactly the same, minus the photo obviously. I'm just going to remove this entirely. This sentence was already in the article before I overhauled it, though it was not referenced. I found a reference and added it in. But come to think of it I probably wouldn't have added the information

1718:

On this note, the film is described as a 'biopic drama' in the lead sentence. Since both 'biopic' and 'drama' are both nouns, would this be correct? It seems this would be similar to calling a film a 'romance comedy' rather than a 'romantic comedy'. How do sources describe the genre of the film? Just

940:

The Themes section was interesting. I wonder if this section can be expanded a bit? I did a brief Internet search, and it seems that academic discussion about this film is slim, but I still wonder if anything can be added. I get the impression that race is a dominant theme of the movie. Was there any

362:

I think the prose in the second paragraph of the "Critical response" section could use more work, because I find a lot of the sentence structures to be very similar. I would add more sentence variety to make it a more cohesive narrative. I am also not sure of using such a long quote at the end of the

2769:

Is it a problem if it indirectly speculates that? I mean, that's not an unreasonable assumption by any means. Furthermore if I say something like Dragon did well during a slow period for movie releases, couldn't it be speculated that it only did well because it's a slow period for film release? I've

1847:

I am not personally doubting this is true, but it seems like a statement we would have to be careful about. It seems to be making a broad claim about real-life United States culture during a specific time period; I am concerned this falls outside the scope of this article and otherwise would require

1485:

In the film the fight is very formal. It's set in a underground chamber with 'kung fu masters' dressed in oriental clothes overseeing the fight. They depict it as a very formal fight set deep in tradition. In reality, it was basically just fought in an empty room with half a dozen people standing in

3664:? This will make the reference list more manageable, and will also clear up a problem I'm anticipating whereby the director comments on an issue repeatedly over a short period, rather than just once. Incidentally I'm just going to delete FN8 as it isn't needed; that sentence has alternate sourcing. 3583:

Sure, someone could listen to the whole commentary, just as someone could read a whole book. But just as we use page numbers to cite specific facts to a specific part of a book, it's appropriate to include timecodes to cite specific facts to a specific part of the commentary. The relevant guideline

2915:

I just played the game via en emulator (it's surprisingly hard btw). Anyway in the first level you only fight one sailor, though from the proceeding cut-scene it is made very clear he is the ringleader of the group of sailors that Bruce fights in the film (the other sailors appear in the background

2788:

In my view, it may not be unreasonable to presume it would do better in a season like summer, but the counterpoint might be that it might actually do worse if the film is up against blockbuster competition. I think my concern is mainly with the use of "Earnings were considerably lower". It may also

2443:

In my view, I don't know that the word 'bittersweet' is the important aspect here. I know this is what the LA Times reporter stated in a literal sense, but I think he was merely trying to write an interesting lead. I would probably just describe simply that the people who attended the premiere felt

2222:

Oh it's a good observation that he is listed as 'Bruce's father'; I actually just checked the credits of the film itself and they refer to the character in that manner as well. However in Chapter 5 of the DVD, 'Bruce's father' takes Bruce into his study which is filled with posters and paraphenalia

2118:

I don't think this would be appropriate, because we don't find out who Bruce's opponent will be until he turns up to the match, and we never actually learn anything about Johnny anyway. No clarification is given as to why he has been chosen to be Bruce's opponent. Therefore I wouldn't actually know

879:

I enjoyed reading this article. I have not seen the movie, and I am not very familiar with Bruce Lee, so it was a learning experience. I particularly enjoyed reading the content about the director's efforts to represent Lee's life faithfully but also employ narrative freedoms to tell an interesting

2391:

I agree that you would not want a photograph that is too close on the ceramics. Ideally a picture from a higher angle might work better, but if it's not available, that's all we can do. I don't know that it's worth removing the sentence about the ceramics, but if another picture comes along to the

1726:

I'm not a copy-editor but I'll take your word on 'biopic drama' being a grammatical issue. I've just replaced every instance of 'biopic' with 'biographical'. There used to be a mixture of the two terms but another reviewer said to be consistent, so now I'll just be consistent using the other word.

1231:

So the final shot is a recreation of a scene in Enter The Dragon. Jason is on a bridge practicing martial arts with the sun setting in the background, in an identical manner to how Bruce lee did in that film. Is there a way you think this could be clarified better to someone who hasn't seen either

225:

Thank you for the clarification. I think "then Washington State University PhD student" is too wordy, and I am uncertain of the value of including the person's school affiliation or student status at the time of the publication. It may be better to instead opt for a more generic/general "academic"

2961:

I have a similar concern as the sentence about racism that was previously in the lead. I fear it could be read as making a contentious claim about history based on the comments of the director, which would not be an ideal source to rely on in this context. Maybe a more straightforward description

2207:

One note on this: I am inclined to say that we should follow the sources in terms of using Bruce's father's name. I see, for example, that AFI, AllMovie, and IMDb all list Ric Young's role as "Bruce's father", rather than Lee Hoi-chuen. While it would be unlikely, perhaps someone might also argue

1671:

There are a couple references to the idea that Cohen did not want to make a traditional biographical film/biopic, so he dramatized things and added elements to the story. My understanding is that biographical films/biopics nearly always dramatize elements and take artistic liberties (otherwise it

1504:

There is no person named Johnny Sun who was involved with Bruce Lee. I would presume they changed the name of the character as they were portraying him in a fictional manner. As is indicated in the article, Bruce Lee's opponent did NOT kick him in the back, therefore calling the character who did

1428:

It may be confusing to refer to these as 'Dolby Digital' sound effects, as it implies that the $ 1 million was largely paid to Dolby for the production of the sound effects, which does not seem to be the case. I know Dolby is mentioned in the source, but I think it is more simply referring to the

106:

was, however, somewhat dramatized, with the director openly saying he wanted the film to have "humor and spectacle" of one of Bruce Lee's actual films, where there was a "larger sense of fun and danger" and "reality is not exactly adhered to". This article has received a peer review and copy-edit

3575:

which features almost as many inline citations to the commentary as my nomination. Is there a reason you're holding my nomination to a higher standard than others? And is this helpful in any case? I mean, in the unfathomably unlikely event that someone is going to go to the trouble to verify the

3071:

I went through and yeah, turns out I did miss a couple instances of using Bruce's last name. I did leave one intact though. "According to Bruce Lee biographer Matthew ..." as saying 'According to Bruce biographer' doesn't work. I tried rewording it to remove the need to mention his last name but

2610:

Yes. When this article was first nominated the sentence read "Cohen said he dramatized the fight's ritual setting though states the event is otherwise genuine." I was asked to clarify which part was 'otherwise genuine', so I clarified that it was the fight's premise that is genuine, as the fight

3056:

For Bruce Lee, are you settling on referring to him as "Bruce" after the first mention? I do still see different names used for him in the article (although I think we can exempt references to full names in the infobox, Cast list section, and side boxes). I would also check references to Vivian

1772:

As far as I can tell, hardly significant at all. I didn't find any coverage of their input. The only reason they get mentioned in the prose is because another reviewer pointed out they got mentioned in the infobox. And the only reason they got mentioned in the infobox is because they're in the

1679:

I don't think many biographical films incorporate supernatural and spiritual themes. I mean, a seven foot Demon keeps chasing Bruce around. That goes way beyond typical dramatisation. Those are also Cohens own words (paraphrased), so I'm inclined to keep them as is. Let me know what you think.

152:

towards the bottom of page 293. Page 294 is omitted from the preview and by page 295 they've clearly stopped talking about the film. The eBook price of $ 30 makes me very hesitant to buy it for less than one page of information that only might be helpful. Also the fact the book gets the year

3037:

Yeah, I had a big problem with last names, because not only do Jason and Bruce share the same name, obviously Brandon and Shannon share his name as well. Johnny and Luke also share a last name, which is why their first names are used. I've made the formatting consistent now though, removing

1616:

My apologies for the delay in getting back here. I have had some personal commitments that have made it difficult to find time to revisit the article. Nonetheless, I did another readthrough tonight and made a few edits to the page. Feel free to modify or inquire about any of those changes.

801:; Cohen used the scene to illustrate Bruce's fame creating a distance between the couple.", which I think could be rephrased as "Metaphors are used to represent real events. An example of this can be found in a scene where a cheering crowd carries Bruce away from Linda after the premier of 1264:

Actually it just occurred to me my only source for this was the director's commentary. The recreation part was seconds before that, when Jason surveys martial arts students. I believe the actual practicing martial arts in front of the sunset is new footage. I've simplified the wording her

377:

I think the paragraph could still use some more tweaking. The paragraph has a lot of great information, but a lot of the sentences have a similar construction of (X critic says Y opinion), and it would read better to vary the sentences more. I am sure you have seen this before, but this

2877:

The Critical response section mentions at the outset that reviewers enjoyed Jason's performance but there was criticism of the film's veneration of Bruce. If this is the reviewer consensus, should this be added to the lead? At the moment it states simply that critics liked Jason's

1939:

So the dream isn't Bruce's, it's his fathers. He enrolls Bruce in martial arts instruction after waking. I can see your point, though I think most people won't think the training is in the dream. If you can think of a way to word it differently though I'm open to suggestions.

1989:

He was apparently disabled in the tournament fight, but we don't learn that until his brother later confronts him. I'm therefore unsure if it's appropriate to say he was disabled in the initial mention of the tournament fight since the viewer doesn't know that at this point.

1496:

Was/is Johnny Sun a real person? Bruce's real life opponent is described earlier as Wong Jack Man, which gave me the impression that Johnny is not real. But this sentence makes me think he is real and that he simply didn't challenge Bruce the way his character did in the

1132:

Hmmm, that's a good point and something I didn't consider. Thanks for bringing it up. That being said, the Rotten Tomatoes summary and score is consistent with the literature I've found. At this stage I'm inclined to leave it in unless there's further comments about the

3006:

Last thing: throughout the article, I noticed that occasionally folks like Bruce, Brandon, and Johnny are referred to by just their first name, just their last name, or their first and last name. I've just read the guideline for the first time now, but it seems that

2761:

This might be better rephrased. It could be seen as speculating that revenue would have been higher if it was released during a different time of the year. I would simply say something like that it opened in a slow period prior to the summer releases, but it did

3812:

They're a subject matter expert on martial arts (coverage of an actual martial arts fight is only thing they are cited for, rather than anything about film), and the author of the article is even a subject matter expert on Bruce Lee himself. He is the author of

3375:

I thought you were initially concerned about what I was using the source to back up in the infobox; that's what I changed initially. What's the issue with its usage in the reception section? If you're referring to the fact the film was released in 1993 whereas

973:

is the author of one chapter of the book cited. The chapter is entitled "Pedagogy and Political Correctness in Martial Arts Cinema", so obviously that's the overall topic at hand. It's a 19 page chapter (excluding references), of which 6 pages is dedicated to

3380:

has a sub-section on '2000s and beyond'; yes, I'm aware of this limitation. However, I don't think it is a concern at this article as from my study of the literature the consensus from the time it was released is consistent with the current consensus at RT.

891:

It's actually supposed to be British. The copy-editor asked me the same thing before he started; I guess 'dramatize' fell through the cracks. I've fixed that, and I've added the British English template to the article to clear up any confusion in the

2372:

There doesn't appear to be. Close ups of the ceramics would be counter productive anyway. The ceramics are not immediately recognisable from the film, whereas the temple's entrance is. I can just remove the reference the the ceramics if you want.

2907:

A minor point: in the Related media section, it states that the player can fight "the English sailor", but the Plot section suggests that the fight involved a group of sailors. Should this be "the English sailors" (plural) or perhaps "an English

382:

has great advice on this. Also, I do not think it is necessary to include this part "gave the film 2.5 out of 4". It is the only part where the reviewer's rating is given so it is a little odd, and I am not sure how helpful it is to the reader.

1279:

Given that, I think it is likely best to remove. It may be questionable to include in the Plot summary anyway if the film itself does not reference the fact that it is a recreation, or if it does not make a substantive point of the recreation.

1087:

Hmmm. I like that idea in theory. Since there's limited sources on themes though I don't really think we can say there's a consensus about them. We'd be making a comment based on one source only, and I'm not sure if that's undue weight for the

1672:

would be a docudrama-style film), so I am unsure this is an optimal characterization. It may be better to simply describe here that Cohen was not concerned with exact historical accuracy rather than referring to the biopic genre specifically

3249:

I have four supports, a source review and an image review. Do you seen any outstanding issues? Sorry to seem impatient, I'm just very keen for this to pass in time for me to nominate it for TFA for the 80th anniversary of Bruce's birth. :)

1547:

As stated, I enjoyed reading the article. Feel free to revert or comment about anything you disagree with or let me know if you think there's something I misunderstood. These are simply some initial thoughts I had as I read the article.

1116:

I'm not necessarily saying it shouldn't be used, but it might be worth thinking about the value in citing Rotten Tomatoes in the Critical response section--or, perhaps, thinking about how prominently it is described in the section. Per

1981:

Was Johnny disabled as a result of Bruce defeating him at the tournament? It may be more effective to mention this happened in the section's initial description of the fight, and then remove the reference to the disability in this

592:. I've reworded all three points. For the second one I've clarified it is a reconstructed shot, rather than footage from the original film, as I believed that was important to mention. Let me know if you have any further concerns. 3279:

The credit list of the film itself, same as my other five film FAs, though I might add my GA reviewer asked me to add the cameo appearances. They don't appear in the same order in the credit list obviously. I'm happy to remove

3483:

for 'edited collections'. Wouldn't this book count as an edited collection, since each chapter is written by a different academic author? If not, what template should I use? I've fixed the author name and italics in any case.

978:; I think it's therefore fair to say she's considering the film to be a major factor in the themes. She doesn't use the term pedagogy directly to describe Dragon, though she makes very clear the scene is a teaching moment. 2770:

been trying to come up with wording that addresses both these concerns and also acknowledges the fact it broke a record (which the source annoyingly doesn't clarify further), but I thought I'd run my points by you first.

1591:

Just wanted to write a quick courtesy note that I appreciate you reviewing my comments; bear with me while I find an opportunity to look over your responses and the current state of the article. I will return here soon.

401:

I included the rating because that's the only review that actually gives a specific rating, but if you think that looks out of place I'm happy to remove it. I'll have another look at trying to restructure the paragraph

676:^ How about: Linda suggests Bruce establishes a martial arts school, but his Chinese peers demand he only train Chinese people. When Bruce refuses to obey the demand, they challenge him to settle the matter in combat. 3562:

Several of my successful film FACs use director's commentary but I've never been asked to give timestamps before. I've just gone through the first dozen odd film featured articles as listed in alphabetical order at

436:

reported the word). For the rest of the article, you have included the writer's name, but in this instance, you only include the publication name. I would include the writer's name here for consistency's sake.

2561:

I was going to ask at GOCE what the appropriate term was, but I mean, this article already went through GOCE and they seemed fine with both terms. Can we not use both? I don't see how this could be a problem.

1021:

For me, removing "themes of" would probably be sufficient. When I read it, I just get the impression that the claim is being made that pedagogy is specifically described by the author as a theme of this film.

302:

I would revise this part, (haunting a young Bruce), to something like (haunting his son) to avoid repeating "Bruce" and I think it is already clear from the context of the paragraph that Bruce is young at the

1095:

It is a shame that there seems to be a limited number of sources discussing the film's themes. If that is the case, I can see your argument that discussing this in the lead may imply too much of a consensus.

184:

Just for the record I did end up getting the source through resource request. But only talked about the film for another sentence or two on the next page, and what it did say didn't look particularly useful.

1468:

Oh the issue is that Bruce helped create the idea on the grounds he would feature as the show's lead character, and instead it was given to another (white) actor. I've reworded the plot to make this clear.

2483:

I don't see how this could be confusing. I mean, Warner Bros. said it was a separate project. If it's separate (as they claim), how could it be stolen? So yes, I'm saying Waner Bros. are saying it wasn't

2553:

I noticed some references to critics that say "from the" and others "of the" when describing what publication they are associated with. I believe "of the" would be the one to use, but this may be worth

1617:

Unfortunately I have run out of time today but I promise I will return here tomorrow to make completed comments to this page. I appreciate your patience and I continue to enjoy my read of this article.

3416:

I've removed the RT source and replaced it with a lead sentence that summarises the consensus. Let me know if you think I should just remove the sentence entirely and lead with the individual reviews.

797:

I'm not sure the use of ; is appropriate in some of these instances. Like "Metaphors are used to represent real events; for example, a cheering crowd carries Bruce away from Linda after the premier of

884:

Is the page written in American or British English? It seems it might be intended to be American ('dramatized', etc.), but I have seen some British usage ('behaviour', 'theatre', 'honour', 'learnt')

730:"It was decided to avoid making a standard biographic film and instead incorporate "mystical and legendary aspects" from Bruce's life, telling his story "as if it were, in fact, a Bruce Lee movie"." 948:

I haven't been able to find any other sources unfortunately. One of my other reviewers even suggested a source to use though upon getting a copy it didn't actually contain any usable information.

738:"Cohen learnt for the first two years of Bruce's life, his parents had dressed and passed him off as a girl to protect him from a superstitious Chinese belief that demons target first-born sons." 1911:

It does. It's basically Bruce's theories about martial arts. I've just clarified it's a martial arts book. A wikilink is there for the book so if people want to know they can read the article.

205:

I've clarified who Meaghan Morris is. At the time he wrote that article, Zheng Zhu was a PhD student at Washington State University, though he is now an Assistant professor of communication at

1505:

kick him Wong Jack Man would have obviously opened them up to all kinds of lawsuits. I've clarified in the prose that Johnny is fictional. Let me know if you think it needs further rewording.

2868:

Thanks for your comments. I am close to supporting. Your work is appreciated. I have just a few more things I noticed when I looked over the latest changes, and then I think I will be done.

1179:

I think we should mention here that Linda is a white woman (or whatever term the MOS recommends; I am not sure). This clarifies the next statement about racism attributed to Linda's mother

3642:

I had to borrow a DVD player off a friend to watch the director's commentary in the first place; few people seem to still own them. I'll try and borrow it off them again soon to do this.

163: 2832:

Thanks again for your patience and for managing the thorough review. I hope it is helpful and I am glad you chose to expand this article. It makes me very interested to see the film.

370:

I've trimmed the Rainer quote. I've also done some reorganising and completely changed one of the reviewers comments. Have a look and let me know if you think it needs more tweaking.

832:. Thanks for your review. I've addressed everything you brought up, either rewording it to what you suggested or something similar. Let me know if you have any further concerns. :) 2365:

The picture of the Lo Pan Temple mentions the ceramic figures at the top of the structure. Is there a picture of the temple that might have a more prominent view of the ceramics?

1848:

strong sources to support. I think we might be better off removing this and simply describing that the film focuses on issues of racism in relation to Bruce in the United States

1904:

Does the film indicate what this book is about? If so, it might be worth a brief description of what he is writing about, unless perhaps it is not described in the film itself

1461:

idea was stolen. Was the idea that this was stolen discussed in the Plot section? My initial impression was merely that the show was produced differently than how Bruce wanted

1080:

It seems that the lead may be missing a brief summary of the themes. I think this would be useful to add particularly if any expansion is able to be done to the Themes section

663:, Cohen decided to include in the script elements of mysticism from Bruce's life, and dramatizing fights scenes to give it the same tone as the films in which Bruce starred. 1932:

Was Bruce enrolled in the class after awakening from the dream? The structure of the sentence might give the impression that he was enrolled in class within the dream itself

2422:

No, it wasn't particularly dangerous. I was just trying to get as much information as possible about fights. I've removed this now, though now the paragraph is a bit bare.

1398:

I found one instance of when it should have been capitilised. I use capitals when referring to the character, and don't when referring to the concept of a demon in general.

559:

Following up my comments at PR, and from what I gathered this received a copy-edit. Just had another read through and I'm happy to support now but consider the following:

2789:

be advisable to remove the reference to the apparent record as that does not seem to be clarified by the source. One option might be a more straightforward description:

1826:

Oh good catch. I checked the edit history and turns out the infobox has been wrong for years and I just didn't pick up on that when I overhauled the article. Fixed now.

209:. I've described him as a 'then Washington State University PhD student', though if you'd rather me introduce him as a current Assistant professor just let me know. 2058:

I can see your point. I've been trying to think of a way to do this but it all comes across as a bit awkward. The best suggestion I have is "haunting his young son

672:"Linda suggests Bruce opens a martial arts school but his Chinese peers demand he must only train Chinese people and challenge him to settle the matter in combat." 655:, Cohen decided to approach the script by including mystical elements and dramatizing fights scenes to give it the same tone as the films in which Bruce starred." 563:

This causes a rift between Linda, who wishes to return to the US, and Bruce - perhaps you can revise for better flow, i.e. rift bet Bruce and Linda, who wishes...

1125:), Rotten Tomatoes is less reliable for pre-Internet films, as many reviews for those films are not online and therefore may not be included in the aggregation. 3606:

I'm not saying it isn't a good idea in principle, I guess I'm asking why is it a requirement for me when most featured film articles aren't asked to do this?

3170:. It was much more thorough than I anticipated, though I'm glad you did it as the article is much better now. As always let me know if there's anything else. 2476:

was their own separate project and it was not stolen? What is the evidence referenced initially that it was in fact stolen? I think this needs to be clarified

2051:

I wonder if there is a way to establish he is in Hong Kong earlier, so we have some context of where the fight takes place and why it involves British sailors

566:

The film ends during a shot of the final scene of Enter the Dragon - for this part, maybe it's clearer to say the film ends 'with' a shot instead of 'during'

955:

Another note about Themes - the section mentions that one commentator explored a theme of pedagogy. Did the author describe pedagogy as an actual theme of

2340:

I noticed this is in the Pre-production section. Did she speak highly of the film while it was in pre-production? Does this mean she liked the screenplay?

767:^ How about: Cohen cast Jason because he believed trying to teach a martial artist to act would be more difficult than training an actor in martial arts. 412:

I've struggled with this, but I've given it another go. Tell me what you think and feel free to make any tweaks yourself if you see room for improvement.

2470:

There is some evidence to support Bruce and Cadwell's assertion that his idea was stolen though according to Warner Bros., Kung Fu was a separate project

809:

Otherwise, I think this is a brilliantly written article, and would be happy to support once these quibbles have been responded to one way or the other.

40: 1066:

generally recommends not to mention publishing information in text, such as journal names and dates, etc., unless there is a compelling reason to do so.

3576:

commentary does in fact back up what it claims I'm pretty sure they'd listen to the whole thing if they've already gone to the trouble to access it.

1486:

the corners watching. I've done some rewording to make this clearer. Let me know if that's still not clear enough and if you'd like further details.

379: 2415:

I wonder if this is worth stating? I imagine minor cuts are relatively common during film shoots. Was it a particularly dangerous scene to shoot?

1265:

accordingly. Let me know if you think it needs further clarification. I'm actually 100% happy to just remove the reference the recreated scenes.

3855: 3840: 3803: 3713: 3691: 3673: 3651: 3633: 3615: 3597: 3538: 3520: 3493: 3467: 3425: 3404: 3390: 3354: 3336: 3296: 3259: 3222: 3200: 3179: 3161: 3139: 3121: 3105:

That keeps the focus on Brandon and the film, and avoids prompting the reader to start wondering what happened during a film shoot unrelated to

3081: 3047: 3032: 2993: 2925: 2894: 2863: 2844: 2820: 2779: 2749: 2721: 2693: 2642: 2624: 2571: 2522: 2504: 2460: 2431: 2382: 2356: 2324: 2292: 2264: 2232: 2198: 2163: 2128: 2095: 2071: 2035: 1999: 1949: 1920: 1892: 1864: 1835: 1782: 1736: 1689: 1650: 1629: 1604: 1579: 1560: 1535: 1303: 1274: 1163: 1045: 1016: 863: 841: 822: 626: 601: 582: 546: 524: 504: 485: 464: 446: 421: 392: 253: 235: 218: 194: 175: 142: 116: 90: 2580:

This is probably okay. The original concern was mainly about consistency; in all, I don't know that either of them are particularly incorrect.

2026:

I've added a sentence about it. I think it's important for the viewer to know that Bruce doesn't know he crippled Johnny, so I mentioned that.

3188:

this article. Your work to expand and overhaul its content will be appreciated by readers who choose to visit the page throughout the future.

1323:

Is Vivian Emery Linda's mother? I may have missed it, but I don't know if this is stated previously in the article. It may be worth clarifying

3866: 30: 17: 569:

Cohen, who wanted the audience to understand from the beginning the film would not be a traditional biopic - "that" the film would not be...

3877: 3318: 2012:

advises that plot events do not have to be described in order, and sometimes it is preferable to rearrange events to make sense of things.

763:"Cohen cast Jason because believed trying to teach a martial artist to act would not work and decided to train an actor in martial arts." 2487:

The evidence it was stolen is complicated. There's several paragraphs on it in a section specifically about the issue at the article for

2283:

Yes. I've reworded to clarify, though now I feel like the flow of the paragraph isn't as good. Zhu's name gets mentioned too many times.

1073:

I think clarifying what Zheng was writing in is a compelling reason, as otherwise it's unclear why we should be listening to his opinion.

3660:. Instead of using time-codes, would it be acceptable to just give the chapter the commentary appeared in, like they've done for the FA 3395:

I appreciate that, but it would be more appropriate to cite that literature directly rather than relying on that site's interpretation.

859: 818: 206: 1140:

I see the reference to Rotten Tomatoes is now removed. I think this is probably best. Good to cite the sources directly in this case.

3094:

I will be bold and add one more suggestion. In my view, the final sentence of the lead might be stronger if we remove "while filming

157:

was released wrong on page 293 (1995 instead of 1993) also doesn't fill me with confidence, but I really appreciate the suggestion.

941:

exploration of this or other themes by critics? Or by more academics? Right now, we are limited to analysis from two commentators.

1200:

Good point. I left that in from before I overhauled the article. It doesn't really serve any purpose so I've removed the term.

642:

I made a couple of copy-edits on my way through the article. Feel free to undo them if you don't think they were of any use.

3458:

It's an edited book not an encyclopedia; the author's name is the wrong way round; chapter titles shouldn't be italicized.

1436:

Hmmm. Good point. I'll just remove Dolby Digital entirely. The key message is that extra money was spent on sound effects.

3818: 3568: 331: 2916:

of the game cheering on their friend, though do not join in like in the film). I've changed it to 'an English sailor'.

3661: 2082:

In Hong Kong, Bruce Lee's father awakens from a nightmare about a phantom, known as the Demon, haunting his young son.

72: 1765:

How significant are Edward Khmara and John Raffo as writers of the film? I noticed they are not mentioned in the lead

3480: 129:

I will put up a review by the end of the week, and I am leaving this as a place-holder. The following book (linked

1391:

When referencing the demon character directly, it seems that the word is sometimes capitalized and other times not

3567:. Of the first five films I found that use DVD commentary as a reference, three don't give timestamps, including 1876:

Is 'fights' (plural) a British/Australian use of the word? In the U.S., we would say 'fight scenes'. Let me know.

3836: 3814: 3709: 3669: 3647: 3611: 3534: 3489: 3421: 3386: 3350: 3255: 3175: 3157: 3135: 3077: 3043: 2989: 2921: 2890: 2859: 2816: 2775: 2745: 2717: 2689: 2638: 2620: 2567: 2518: 2500: 2488: 2456: 2427: 2378: 2352: 2320: 2288: 2260: 2228: 2194: 2159: 2124: 2091: 2067: 2031: 1995: 1945: 1916: 1888: 1860: 1831: 1778: 1732: 1685: 1646: 1575: 1570:, I really appreciate them. I've replied to each of your points. Let me know if you have any further concerns. 1531: 1299: 1270: 1159: 1041: 1012: 924: 837: 699: 597: 500: 460: 417: 343: 249: 214: 190: 112: 86: 2248:

Is this his college education? Or his martial arts education? I assume the money was so he could start college

993:. Rather, it sounds like pedagogy was was a topic of her writing. I wonder if there is a way to clarify this. 923:

does list some exceptions where this is okay, but it might be worth checking the page with something like the

855: 814: 1244:

ends with a shot of Bruce practicing martial arts in front of the sunset, an homage to a scene in the real

716:. Otherwise, I thought I'd point out now how wonderfully written I think this section is. I love the whole 3572: 2137:

I don't think the way it's written now is a dealbreaker, but a quick description could be something like

2111:

I have a similar concern that it may be better to introduce who Johnny is before we say he was defeated

1360:

Is this meant to be plural, as in there was an extortion attempt by multiple triads, or just one triad?

2959:

was done to show the appalling conditions most Chinese people experienced when emigrating at the time.

1512:

Thanks for the clarification. You might notice I made a minor edit that clarifies this a bit further.

3851: 3799: 3687: 3629: 3593: 3516: 3463: 3400: 3332: 3292: 2513:

Actually I've given a go at clarifying the allegation and issue further, let me know what you think.

542: 272: 3832: 3705: 3665: 3643: 3607: 3530: 3485: 3417: 3382: 3346: 3251: 3171: 3153: 3131: 3073: 3039: 2985: 2917: 2886: 2855: 2812: 2771: 2741: 2713: 2685: 2634: 2616: 2563: 2514: 2496: 2452: 2423: 2374: 2348: 2316: 2284: 2256: 2224: 2190: 2180: 2155: 2120: 2087: 2063: 2027: 1991: 1941: 1912: 1884: 1856: 1827: 1774: 1728: 1681: 1662: 1642: 1611: 1586: 1571: 1527: 1295: 1266: 1155: 1037: 1008: 833: 805:. Cohen said he used this scene to illustrate Bruce's fame creating a distance between the couple." 694: 608: 593: 496: 456: 413: 338: 245: 210: 186: 108: 82: 3505: 3476: 3218: 2705:

It would probably be best to give the date this happened, when the film debuted in public release

2009: 851: 829: 810: 788:^ Cohen decided to expand the theme of Bruce's father's belief that a demon was stalking his son 622: 578: 2795:

described the earnings as "impressive" for a debut in the historically-slow period of early May.

3585: 660: 652: 432: 1641:

Thanks for keeping me posted. I'm really happy with the minor changes you've made so far. :)

1207:

I think 'climactic' is probably clear enough to most readers that the wikilink can be removed

476:

Great work with the article. I will support this for promotion once everything is addressed.

107:

from GOCE (sans the Themes section, which I had not yet written when the copyedit was done).

3870: 3377: 3308: 3237: 1745:

I believe this is a good change, especially if sources largely use the term 'biographical'.

1122: 1063: 520: 481: 442: 388: 231: 171: 138: 61: 3451:

Can you tell me what's wrong with it? If I've done something wrong I don't know what it is.

2301:

I went ahead and changed one use of his name to 'he'. Let me know if you think that works.

784:"Cohen decided to expand the theme of Bruce's father's belief a demon was stalking his son" 3847: 3828: 3795: 3701: 3683: 3657: 3625: 3589: 3512: 3459: 3411: 3396: 3370: 3328: 3288: 3012: 538: 734:^ It was decided by who? Cohen? The producers? I'd quantify this, if possible to do so. 317:

For this part, (as is allows Linda), I think you mean "it allows" instead of "is allows".

3869:

has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see

3195: 3116: 3109:. The information can then be kept in the article body for people that are interested. 3064: 3027: 2973: 2941: 2839: 2804: 2658: 2587: 2538: 2399: 2308: 2215: 2147: 2019: 1965: 1798: 1752: 1705: 1624: 1599: 1555: 1519: 1412: 1344: 1287: 1257: 1147: 1103: 1029: 1000: 970: 919:

I have spotted some duplicate links, particularly in the Casting section. As you know,

906: 1930:

and subsequently enrolls him in a Chinese martial arts class led by instructor Yip Man

3244: 3230: 3214: 618: 589: 574: 53: 2603:

Was is meant by the premise of the fight is genuine? Simply that the fight happened?

1845:

an example of behaviour towards Asian people that was typical in the US at the time.

3734:

Be consistent in whether newspaper citations include subtitles as part of the title

3564: 2633:

I've decided to expand on this a bit with more detail. Let me know what you think.

295:

Yeah I think that changed was made during the copy-edit actually. I've reworded it.

3099: 2963: 2958: 2790: 2758: 2730: 2702: 2673: 2600: 2469: 2440: 2412: 2337: 2273: 2245: 2176: 2138: 2108: 2081: 2048: 1978: 1929: 1901: 1873: 1844: 1493: 1475: 1425: 1374: 1357: 1320: 1240: 1221: 1176: 986: 130: 3884: 3072:

everything sounded awkward so I think it's best to leave it as is in this case.

3008: 2615:

source used in the article, it was over quickly and was quite awkward to watch.

2179:(and also the link to him in the Cast section) These may not be consistent with 2139:

Bruce defeats a challenger named Johnny Sun in a secret, no-holds-barred match".

933:

I checked using the tool. It found three duplicate links. I've removed them all.

516: 492: 477: 438: 407: 384: 227: 167: 134: 57: 1727:

Sources most frequently described it as both a drama and a biographical film.

1457:

The Historical accuracy section discusses the accuracy of whether or not the

688:

mother. It's obvious who we're talking about at this point in the paragraph.

3191: 3167: 3149: 3112: 3060: 3023: 2969: 2937: 2851: 2835: 2800: 2654: 2583: 2534: 2395: 2304: 2211: 2143: 2015: 1961: 1794: 1748: 1701: 1636: 1620: 1595: 1567: 1551: 1515: 1443:

It may be helpful to note that the Grauman's Chinese Theatre is in Hollywood

1408: 1340: 1330:

Hey good catch. I never actually clarified her name in the plot. Fixed now .

1283: 1253: 1143: 1099: 1025: 996: 902: 717: 99: 2759:

Earnings were considerably lower than those during busier times of the year

1819:? It seems the article body says the former and the infobox says the latter 776:"None of the custom-made sound effects in the fight scenes was used twice." 613:

Looks good and great piece of work, nothing hindering me from providing my

1494:

Johnny did not challenge Bruce to a rematch there as depicted in the film.

1177:

where he meets Linda. Bruce marries Linda in defiance of her racist mother

3748:

FN13: AllMusic is italicized here but in plain text in the article - why?

1154:

Yep, another reviewer also complained about it so I removed it entirely.

1118: 713: 720:

aspect, how one thing ends up feeding into another. Brilliantly done. ;)

659:^ I'd rephrase this to something like: Rather than making a traditional 920: 166:, but a factual error like that does not inspire confidence either. 39:

Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in

3103:

is dedicated to Brandon, who died several weeks before its release.

1007:

I'm at a bit of a loss of how to clarify it further at this stage.

2413:

One stuntman received a minor cut during the hall of mirrors scene

987:

Writing about themes of pedagogy and political correctness in film

751:"While Brandon Lee was the right age and had appropriate training" 573:

Nothing to frighten the horses there, but worth checking I think.

742:^ Cohen learnt that for the first two years of Bruce's life, ... 336:

is linked in the "Plot" and the "Casting" sections. The same for

3287:

They can be included, just suggest giving an explicit citation.

1426:

a further $ 1 million on Dolby Digital fight-scene sound effects

989:, I get the sense that Morris is saying pedagogy is a theme of 148:

Thanks Aoba47. Looking at that source: it starts talking about

1429:

fact that the film was exhibited with Dolby Digital technology

1377:

I think it would be valuable to clarify that Macao is in China

1958:

Ah yes, I misspoke there. In all, I think it now looks okay.

899:

Thanks for clarifying. I think this is all looking good now.

2964:

was done to show experiences of emigration by Chinese people

3704:. This is done now. Let me know if there are any concerns. 1222:

The film ends with a reconstructed shot of the final scene

3783:

I don't think so. I've changed them to offline citations.

2676:

Does this mean a replica of Bruce's real life gravestone?

348:

is also linked twice. I would have them only linked once.

3038:

references to their last names after the first mention.

2854:. Thanks for your comments. I've replied to everything. 2531:

I think the section is strengthened with these changes.

65: 2733:

Over what period? Was this during the opening weekend?

511:

Everything looks good. Great work with the article. I

342:

for the "Plot" and the "Pre-production" sections, and

102:. Commercially successfully and critically acclaimed, 3776:

FN24: is this an authorized republication? Ditto FN27

1979:

Johnny's humiliating defeat and subsequent disability

963:

scene was a teaching moment for the Linda character?

270:

is dedicated to Brandon Lee, who died while filming

2703:

The film debuted at number one at the US box office

266:

I am confused by the repetition in this sentence, (

2797:Or something similar. Let me know what you think. 3893:The above discussion is preserved as an archive. 3831:. Couple questions about points as listed above. 2062:". Let me know if you have a better suggestion. 162:That is understandable. You could always ask on 2441:the word 'bittersweet' was mentioned many times 846:I'm happy with the changes you've made, so can 755:^ I'd specify that that he had the appropriate 43:. No further edits should be made to this page. 2444:that it was bittersweet due to Brandon's death 3899:No further edits should be made to this page. 3883:template in place on the talk page until the 3327:BBFC should be listed as publisher not work. 29:The following is an archived discussion of a 8: 2934:Props to you for playing the game to check! 2611:itself is also dramatised. According to the 1239:I wonder if something like this would work: 1193:I am unclear about what an 'honour match' is 3130:I think that's a good idea actually. Done. 985:I suppose since the sentence is written as 680:"the couple reconcile with Linda's mother." 2049:resulting in him having to leave Hong Kong 1719:a 'biopic'? 'Drama'? 'Biographical drama'? 495:. I've tried to address all the concerns. 41:Knowledge talk:Featured article candidates 1186:Hey yeah, that's also a good point. Done. 3571:which was only promoted last month, and 2811:Oh that's much better wording, changed. 2601:the fight's premise is otherwise genuine 3555:FN6 should include timecodes. Ditto FN8 2392:Commons, it would be worth looking at. 2080:That could work. Another quick idea is 1321:He cast Michael Learned as Vivian Emery 430:I have a question about this part (The 3148:I've made a reply to everything again 2276:Who made these critiques? Is this Zhu? 288:are represented in two different ways. 3755:I guess I made a tiny mistake. Fixed. 3272:What is the source for the cast list? 2731:45% of the film's audience were women 2684:myself as it isn't that interesting. 18:Knowledge:Featured article candidates 7: 3817:notable book on Bruce, published by 3319:British Board of Film Classification 3057:Emergy. Let me know what you think. 850:. Good luck with the nomination! ;) 276:several weeks before the release of 244:Yeah agreed. Changed to 'academic'. 98:This article is about the biopic of 3213:I think we need a source review? -- 959:? Or was she just stating that the 207:New York City College of Technology 2347:No. That's an oversight. Removed. 2008:In this case, I think it is okay. 1478:I am unclear about what this means 1224:I am unclear about what this means 651:"Rather than making a traditional 24: 3152:. Let me know what you think. :) 2472:To clarify, did Warner Bros. say 1566:Thanks so much for your comments 588:Thanks so much for your comments 3794:a high-quality reliable source? 2338:Cadwell spoke highly of the film 1062:Also about Themes - I note that 3166:Thanks so much for your review 491:Thanks so much for your review 3260:08:10, 13 September 2020 (UTC) 3201:06:10, 13 September 2020 (UTC) 3180:04:26, 13 September 2020 (UTC) 3162:11:35, 12 September 2020 (UTC) 3140:04:26, 13 September 2020 (UTC) 3122:17:48, 12 September 2020 (UTC) 3082:04:26, 13 September 2020 (UTC) 3048:11:35, 12 September 2020 (UTC) 3033:03:00, 12 September 2020 (UTC) 2994:11:35, 12 September 2020 (UTC) 2926:11:35, 12 September 2020 (UTC) 2895:11:35, 12 September 2020 (UTC) 2864:17:42, 10 September 2020 (UTC) 2845:09:55, 10 September 2020 (UTC) 2821:06:55, 12 September 2020 (UTC) 2780:17:23, 10 September 2020 (UTC) 2750:16:54, 10 September 2020 (UTC) 2722:16:54, 10 September 2020 (UTC) 2694:16:54, 10 September 2020 (UTC) 2643:08:59, 11 September 2020 (UTC) 2625:03:18, 11 September 2020 (UTC) 2572:17:42, 10 September 2020 (UTC) 2523:08:59, 11 September 2020 (UTC) 2505:17:42, 10 September 2020 (UTC) 2461:16:54, 10 September 2020 (UTC) 2432:16:39, 10 September 2020 (UTC) 2383:16:39, 10 September 2020 (UTC) 2357:16:39, 10 September 2020 (UTC) 2325:06:51, 12 September 2020 (UTC) 2293:16:39, 10 September 2020 (UTC) 2265:16:39, 10 September 2020 (UTC) 2233:04:26, 13 September 2020 (UTC) 2199:16:39, 10 September 2020 (UTC) 2164:06:51, 12 September 2020 (UTC) 2129:16:39, 10 September 2020 (UTC) 2096:06:51, 12 September 2020 (UTC) 2072:17:23, 10 September 2020 (UTC) 2036:06:51, 12 September 2020 (UTC) 2000:16:15, 10 September 2020 (UTC) 1950:16:15, 10 September 2020 (UTC) 1921:16:15, 10 September 2020 (UTC) 1893:16:15, 10 September 2020 (UTC) 1883:No that's just a typo. Fixed. 1865:16:15, 10 September 2020 (UTC) 1836:16:15, 10 September 2020 (UTC) 1783:17:23, 10 September 2020 (UTC) 1737:17:23, 10 September 2020 (UTC) 1690:17:23, 10 September 2020 (UTC) 1536:16:15, 10 September 2020 (UTC) 1526:Very happy with your changes. 1358:an extortion attempt by triads 1304:06:51, 12 September 2020 (UTC) 1275:16:15, 10 September 2020 (UTC) 1164:16:15, 10 September 2020 (UTC) 1046:06:51, 12 September 2020 (UTC) 1017:16:15, 10 September 2020 (UTC) 1: 3856:15:22, 5 September 2020 (UTC) 3841:00:44, 1 September 2020 (UTC) 3714:10:53, 4 September 2020 (UTC) 3692:11:37, 2 September 2020 (UTC) 3674:07:19, 2 September 2020 (UTC) 3652:12:50, 1 September 2020 (UTC) 3634:12:32, 1 September 2020 (UTC) 3616:03:18, 1 September 2020 (UTC) 3598:00:54, 1 September 2020 (UTC) 3539:12:50, 1 September 2020 (UTC) 3521:12:32, 1 September 2020 (UTC) 3494:03:18, 1 September 2020 (UTC) 3468:00:54, 1 September 2020 (UTC) 3426:03:42, 5 September 2020 (UTC) 3405:20:29, 4 September 2020 (UTC) 3391:14:38, 4 September 2020 (UTC) 3355:03:18, 1 September 2020 (UTC) 3337:00:54, 1 September 2020 (UTC) 3297:00:54, 1 September 2020 (UTC) 2274:Critiques, however, were made 2060:outside a temple in Hong Kong 1651:07:22, 9 September 2020 (UTC) 1630:07:04, 9 September 2020 (UTC) 1605:20:35, 3 September 2020 (UTC) 864:22:17, 1 September 2020 (UTC) 3819:University of Nebraska Press 3569:The Beautician and the Beast 537:are appropriately licensed. 3878:featured article candidates 3804:23:08, 31 August 2020 (UTC) 3762:Fn19 has a duplicated title 3662:American Beauty (1999 film) 3223:15:50, 31 August 2020 (UTC) 2962:might work better, such as 1580:10:20, 31 August 2020 (UTC) 1561:07:49, 31 August 2020 (UTC) 1242:Dragon: The Bruce Lee Story 842:05:13, 31 August 2020 (UTC) 823:23:53, 30 August 2020 (UTC) 627:13:38, 25 August 2020 (UTC) 602:01:34, 25 August 2020 (UTC) 583:15:02, 24 August 2020 (UTC) 547:23:15, 17 August 2020 (UTC) 525:20:56, 15 August 2020 (UTC) 505:03:40, 14 August 2020 (UTC) 486:20:34, 13 August 2020 (UTC) 465:03:18, 15 August 2020 (UTC) 447:20:18, 14 August 2020 (UTC) 422:09:20, 15 August 2020 (UTC) 393:20:18, 14 August 2020 (UTC) 286:Dragon: The Bruce Lee Story 278:Dragon: The Bruce Lee Story 254:03:40, 14 August 2020 (UTC) 236:17:47, 13 August 2020 (UTC) 219:10:45, 13 August 2020 (UTC) 195:15:06, 21 August 2020 (UTC) 176:16:25, 13 August 2020 (UTC) 143:01:30, 13 August 2020 (UTC) 117:15:35, 12 August 2020 (UTC) 91:15:35, 12 August 2020 (UTC) 73:Dragon: The Bruce Lee Story 31:featured article nomination 3916: 3481:Template:Cite encyclopedia 3363:RT is still there as FN32? 2966:. Or something like that. 1811:Is the Robert Clouse book 1476:the fight's ritual setting 638:Support from Homeostasis07 2651:I think this looks okay. 3896:Please do not modify it. 2489:Kung Fu (1972 TV series) 2109:Bruce defeats Johnny Sun 1817:Bruce Lee: The Beginning 1813:Bruce Lee: The Biography 1250:Or something like that. 700:Kung Fu (1972 TV series) 36:Please do not modify it. 3827:Thanks for your review 1874:dramatise fights scenes 1337:Thanks for clarifying. 3846:Should be good to go. 3268:- spotchecks not done 2246:continue his education 2119:how to introduce him. 1902:helps him write a book 1698:I think this is fair. 1367:Good catch. Clarified. 961:Breakfast at Tiffany's 692:Also change link from 3573:Boys Don't Cry (film) 1855:Good point. Removed. 1121:(which also links to 712:I'd consider linking 702:, per recent redirect 280:.), particularly how 2315:Looks good, thanks. 1214:Good point. Removed. 780:^ were used twice? 555:Support from Pseud14 515:this for promotion. 164:the resource request 64:) 14 September 2020 3682:Sure, that's fine. 3444:FN2 is misformatted 2255:College. Reworded. 792:Historical accuracy 695:Kung Fu (TV series) 339:Tao of Jeet Kune Do 125:Support from Aoba47 3477:Template:Cite book 3317:Changed source to 2885:Good point. Done. 2177:Bruce Lee's father 1375:were shot in Macao 3199: 3120: 3068: 3031: 2977: 2945: 2843: 2808: 2793:Los Angeles Times 2662: 2591: 2542: 2403: 2312: 2219: 2151: 2023: 1969: 1802: 1756: 1709: 1628: 1603: 1559: 1523: 1416: 1348: 1291: 1261: 1151: 1107: 1033: 1004: 910: 875:Support from NTox 433:Los Angeles Times 94: 3907: 3898: 3882: 3876: 3873:, and leave the 3624:They should be. 3510: 3504: 3415: 3374: 3248: 3241: 3234: 3198: 3189: 3119: 3110: 3104: 3067: 3058: 3030: 3021: 2976: 2967: 2965: 2960: 2944: 2935: 2842: 2833: 2807: 2798: 2796: 2760: 2732: 2704: 2675: 2661: 2652: 2602: 2590: 2581: 2541: 2532: 2471: 2442: 2414: 2402: 2393: 2339: 2311: 2302: 2275: 2247: 2218: 2209: 2178: 2150: 2141: 2140: 2110: 2083: 2050: 2022: 2013: 1980: 1968: 1959: 1931: 1903: 1875: 1846: 1801: 1792: 1755: 1746: 1708: 1699: 1666: 1640: 1627: 1618: 1615: 1602: 1593: 1590: 1558: 1549: 1522: 1513: 1495: 1477: 1427: 1415: 1406: 1376: 1359: 1347: 1338: 1322: 1290: 1281: 1260: 1251: 1249: 1246:Enter The Dragon 1223: 1178: 1150: 1141: 1106: 1097: 1032: 1023: 1003: 994: 988: 909: 900: 612: 411: 363:Rainer sentence. 333:The Green Hornet 79: 48:The article was 38: 3915: 3914: 3910: 3909: 3908: 3906: 3905: 3904: 3903: 3894: 3880: 3874: 3508: 3502: 3409: 3368: 3242: 3235: 3228: 3211: 3190: 3111: 3098:", so it reads 3059: 3022: 3013:MOS:SAMESURNAME 2968: 2936: 2834: 2799: 2740:Yes. Reworded. 2653: 2582: 2533: 2394: 2303: 2210: 2142: 2014: 1960: 1793: 1747: 1700: 1660: 1634: 1619: 1609: 1594: 1584: 1550: 1514: 1407: 1339: 1282: 1252: 1142: 1098: 1024: 995: 901: 877: 771:Post-production 640: 606: 557: 405: 127: 76: 34: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 3913: 3911: 3902: 3901: 3889: 3888: 3859: 3858: 3833:Damien Linnane 3825: 3824: 3823: 3822: 3807: 3806: 3787: 3786: 3785: 3784: 3778: 3777: 3773: 3772: 3771: 3770: 3764: 3763: 3759: 3758: 3757: 3756: 3750: 3749: 3745: 3744: 3743: 3742: 3736: 3735: 3731: 3730: 3729: 3728: 3727: 3726: 3725: 3724: 3723: 3722: 3721: 3720: 3719: 3718: 3717: 3716: 3706:Damien Linnane 3695: 3694: 3677: 3676: 3666:Damien Linnane 3654: 3644:Damien Linnane 3637: 3636: 3619: 3618: 3608:Damien Linnane 3601: 3600: 3578: 3577: 3557: 3556: 3552: 3551: 3550: 3549: 3548: 3547: 3546: 3545: 3544: 3543: 3542: 3541: 3531:Damien Linnane 3524: 3523: 3497: 3496: 3486:Damien Linnane 3471: 3470: 3453: 3452: 3446: 3445: 3441: 3440: 3439: 3438: 3437: 3436: 3435: 3434: 3433: 3432: 3431: 3430: 3429: 3428: 3418:Damien Linnane 3383:Damien Linnane 3365: 3364: 3358: 3357: 3347:Damien Linnane 3340: 3339: 3322: 3321: 3312: 3311: 3304: 3303: 3302: 3301: 3300: 3299: 3282: 3281: 3274: 3273: 3263: 3262: 3252:Damien Linnane 3210: 3207: 3206: 3205: 3204: 3203: 3184:I am happy to 3172:Damien Linnane 3154:Damien Linnane 3147: 3146: 3145: 3144: 3143: 3142: 3132:Damien Linnane 3125: 3124: 3091: 3090: 3089: 3088: 3087: 3086: 3085: 3084: 3074:Damien Linnane 3051: 3050: 3040:Damien Linnane 3018: 3017: 3001: 3000: 2999: 2998: 2997: 2996: 2986:Damien Linnane 2979: 2978: 2953: 2952: 2951: 2950: 2949: 2948: 2947: 2946: 2929: 2928: 2918:Damien Linnane 2910: 2909: 2902: 2901: 2900: 2899: 2898: 2897: 2887:Damien Linnane 2880: 2879: 2872: 2871: 2870: 2869: 2856:Damien Linnane 2830: 2829: 2828: 2827: 2826: 2825: 2824: 2823: 2813:Damien Linnane 2783: 2782: 2772:Damien Linnane 2764: 2763: 2755: 2754: 2753: 2752: 2742:Damien Linnane 2735: 2734: 2727: 2726: 2725: 2724: 2714:Damien Linnane 2707: 2706: 2699: 2698: 2697: 2696: 2686:Damien Linnane 2678: 2677: 2670: 2669: 2668: 2667: 2666: 2665: 2664: 2663: 2646: 2645: 2635:Damien Linnane 2628: 2627: 2617:Damien Linnane 2605: 2604: 2597: 2596: 2595: 2594: 2593: 2592: 2575: 2574: 2564:Damien Linnane 2556: 2555: 2550: 2549: 2548: 2547: 2546: 2545: 2544: 2543: 2526: 2525: 2515:Damien Linnane 2508: 2507: 2497:Damien Linnane 2485: 2478: 2477: 2466: 2465: 2464: 2463: 2453:Damien Linnane 2446: 2445: 2437: 2436: 2435: 2434: 2424:Damien Linnane 2417: 2416: 2409: 2408: 2407: 2406: 2405: 2404: 2386: 2385: 2375:Damien Linnane 2367: 2366: 2362: 2361: 2360: 2359: 2349:Damien Linnane 2342: 2341: 2334: 2333: 2332: 2331: 2330: 2329: 2328: 2327: 2317:Damien Linnane 2296: 2295: 2285:Damien Linnane 2278: 2277: 2270: 2269: 2268: 2267: 2257:Damien Linnane 2250: 2249: 2242: 2241: 2240: 2239: 2238: 2237: 2236: 2235: 2225:Damien Linnane 2202: 2201: 2191:Damien Linnane 2184: 2183: 2173: 2172: 2171: 2170: 2169: 2168: 2167: 2166: 2156:Damien Linnane 2132: 2131: 2121:Damien Linnane 2113: 2112: 2105: 2104: 2103: 2102: 2101: 2100: 2099: 2098: 2088:Damien Linnane 2075: 2074: 2064:Damien Linnane 2053: 2052: 2045: 2044: 2043: 2042: 2041: 2040: 2039: 2038: 2028:Damien Linnane 2003: 2002: 1992:Damien Linnane 1984: 1983: 1975: 1974: 1973: 1972: 1971: 1970: 1953: 1952: 1942:Damien Linnane 1934: 1933: 1926: 1925: 1924: 1923: 1913:Damien Linnane 1906: 1905: 1898: 1897: 1896: 1895: 1885:Damien Linnane 1878: 1877: 1870: 1869: 1868: 1867: 1857:Damien Linnane 1850: 1849: 1841: 1840: 1839: 1838: 1828:Damien Linnane 1821: 1820: 1808: 1807: 1806: 1805: 1804: 1803: 1786: 1785: 1775:Damien Linnane 1767: 1766: 1762: 1761: 1760: 1759: 1758: 1757: 1740: 1739: 1729:Damien Linnane 1721: 1720: 1715: 1714: 1713: 1712: 1711: 1710: 1693: 1692: 1682:Damien Linnane 1674: 1673: 1663:Damien Linnane 1658: 1657: 1656: 1655: 1654: 1653: 1643:Damien Linnane 1612:Damien Linnane 1607: 1587:Damien Linnane 1572:Damien Linnane 1545: 1544: 1543: 1542: 1541: 1540: 1539: 1538: 1528:Damien Linnane 1507: 1506: 1499: 1498: 1490: 1489: 1488: 1487: 1480: 1479: 1472: 1471: 1470: 1469: 1463: 1462: 1454: 1453: 1452: 1451: 1445: 1444: 1440: 1439: 1438: 1437: 1431: 1430: 1422: 1421: 1420: 1419: 1418: 1417: 1400: 1399: 1393: 1392: 1388: 1387: 1386: 1385: 1379: 1378: 1371: 1370: 1369: 1368: 1362: 1361: 1354: 1353: 1352: 1351: 1350: 1349: 1332: 1331: 1325: 1324: 1317: 1316: 1315: 1314: 1313: 1312: 1311: 1310: 1309: 1308: 1307: 1306: 1296:Damien Linnane 1267:Damien Linnane 1234: 1233: 1226: 1225: 1218: 1217: 1216: 1215: 1209: 1208: 1204: 1203: 1202: 1201: 1195: 1194: 1190: 1189: 1188: 1187: 1181: 1180: 1173: 1172: 1171: 1170: 1169: 1168: 1167: 1166: 1156:Damien Linnane 1135: 1134: 1127: 1126: 1113: 1112: 1111: 1110: 1109: 1108: 1090: 1089: 1082: 1081: 1077: 1076: 1075: 1074: 1068: 1067: 1059: 1058: 1057: 1056: 1055: 1054: 1053: 1052: 1051: 1050: 1049: 1048: 1038:Damien Linnane 1009:Damien Linnane 980: 979: 971:Meaghan Morris 965: 964: 952: 951: 950: 949: 943: 942: 937: 936: 935: 934: 928: 927: 916: 915: 914: 913: 912: 911: 894: 893: 886: 885: 876: 870: 869: 868: 867: 866: 834:Damien Linnane 807: 806: 786: 785: 778: 777: 765: 764: 759:training here 753: 752: 740: 739: 732: 731: 725:Pre-production 722: 721: 704: 703: 682: 681: 674: 673: 657: 656: 639: 633: 632: 631: 630: 629: 609:Damien Linnane 594:Damien Linnane 571: 570: 567: 564: 556: 550: 532: 531: 530: 529: 528: 527: 497:Damien Linnane 474: 473: 472: 471: 470: 469: 468: 467: 457:Damien Linnane 450: 449: 427: 426: 425: 424: 414:Damien Linnane 403: 396: 395: 372: 371: 365: 364: 359: 358: 357: 356: 350: 349: 328: 327: 326: 325: 319: 318: 314: 313: 312: 311: 305: 304: 299: 298: 297: 296: 290: 289: 263: 262: 261: 260: 259: 258: 257: 256: 246:Damien Linnane 239: 238: 211:Damien Linnane 203: 202: 201: 200: 199: 198: 197: 187:Damien Linnane 179: 178: 126: 120: 109:Damien Linnane 96: 95: 83:Damien Linnane 81:Nominator(s): 75: 70: 69: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3912: 3900: 3897: 3891: 3890: 3887:goes through. 3886: 3879: 3872: 3868: 3864: 3861: 3860: 3857: 3853: 3849: 3845: 3844: 3843: 3842: 3838: 3834: 3830: 3820: 3816: 3811: 3810: 3809: 3808: 3805: 3801: 3797: 3793: 3789: 3788: 3782: 3781: 3780: 3779: 3775: 3774: 3768: 3767: 3766: 3765: 3761: 3760: 3754: 3753: 3752: 3751: 3747: 3746: 3740: 3739: 3738: 3737: 3733: 3732: 3715: 3711: 3707: 3703: 3699: 3698: 3697: 3696: 3693: 3689: 3685: 3681: 3680: 3679: 3678: 3675: 3671: 3667: 3663: 3659: 3655: 3653: 3649: 3645: 3641: 3640: 3639: 3638: 3635: 3631: 3627: 3623: 3622: 3621: 3620: 3617: 3613: 3609: 3605: 3604: 3603: 3602: 3599: 3595: 3591: 3587: 3582: 3581: 3580: 3579: 3574: 3570: 3566: 3561: 3560: 3559: 3558: 3554: 3553: 3540: 3536: 3532: 3528: 3527: 3526: 3525: 3522: 3518: 3514: 3507: 3501: 3500: 3499: 3498: 3495: 3491: 3487: 3482: 3478: 3475: 3474: 3473: 3472: 3469: 3465: 3461: 3457: 3456: 3455: 3454: 3450: 3449: 3448: 3447: 3443: 3442: 3427: 3423: 3419: 3413: 3408: 3407: 3406: 3402: 3398: 3394: 3393: 3392: 3388: 3384: 3379: 3372: 3367: 3366: 3362: 3361: 3360: 3359: 3356: 3352: 3348: 3344: 3343: 3342: 3341: 3338: 3334: 3330: 3326: 3325: 3324: 3323: 3320: 3316: 3315: 3314: 3313: 3310: 3306: 3305: 3298: 3294: 3290: 3286: 3285: 3284: 3283: 3278: 3277: 3276: 3275: 3271: 3270: 3269: 3267: 3266:Source review 3261: 3257: 3253: 3246: 3239: 3232: 3227: 3226: 3225: 3224: 3220: 3216: 3208: 3202: 3197: 3193: 3187: 3183: 3182: 3181: 3177: 3173: 3169: 3165: 3164: 3163: 3159: 3155: 3151: 3141: 3137: 3133: 3129: 3128: 3127: 3126: 3123: 3118: 3114: 3108: 3102: 3097: 3093: 3092: 3083: 3079: 3075: 3070: 3069: 3066: 3062: 3055: 3054: 3053: 3052: 3049: 3045: 3041: 3036: 3035: 3034: 3029: 3025: 3020: 3019: 3014: 3010: 3005: 3004: 3003: 3002: 2995: 2991: 2987: 2983: 2982: 2981: 2980: 2975: 2971: 2957: 2956: 2955: 2954: 2943: 2939: 2933: 2932: 2931: 2930: 2927: 2923: 2919: 2914: 2913: 2912: 2911: 2906: 2905: 2904: 2903: 2896: 2892: 2888: 2884: 2883: 2882: 2881: 2876: 2875: 2874: 2873: 2867: 2866: 2865: 2861: 2857: 2853: 2849: 2848: 2847: 2846: 2841: 2837: 2822: 2818: 2814: 2810: 2809: 2806: 2802: 2794: 2787: 2786: 2785: 2784: 2781: 2777: 2773: 2768: 2767: 2766: 2765: 2757: 2756: 2751: 2747: 2743: 2739: 2738: 2737: 2736: 2729: 2728: 2723: 2719: 2715: 2711: 2710: 2709: 2708: 2701: 2700: 2695: 2691: 2687: 2682: 2681: 2680: 2679: 2672: 2671: 2660: 2656: 2650: 2649: 2648: 2647: 2644: 2640: 2636: 2632: 2631: 2630: 2629: 2626: 2622: 2618: 2614: 2609: 2608: 2607: 2606: 2599: 2598: 2589: 2585: 2579: 2578: 2577: 2576: 2573: 2569: 2565: 2560: 2559: 2558: 2557: 2552: 2551: 2540: 2536: 2530: 2529: 2528: 2527: 2524: 2520: 2516: 2512: 2511: 2510: 2509: 2506: 2502: 2498: 2494: 2490: 2486: 2482: 2481: 2480: 2479: 2475: 2468: 2467: 2462: 2458: 2454: 2450: 2449: 2448: 2447: 2439: 2438: 2433: 2429: 2425: 2421: 2420: 2419: 2418: 2411: 2410: 2401: 2397: 2390: 2389: 2388: 2387: 2384: 2380: 2376: 2371: 2370: 2369: 2368: 2364: 2363: 2358: 2354: 2350: 2346: 2345: 2344: 2343: 2336: 2335: 2326: 2322: 2318: 2314: 2313: 2310: 2306: 2300: 2299: 2298: 2297: 2294: 2290: 2286: 2282: 2281: 2280: 2279: 2272: 2271: 2266: 2262: 2258: 2254: 2253: 2252: 2251: 2244: 2243: 2234: 2230: 2226: 2221: 2220: 2217: 2213: 2206: 2205: 2204: 2203: 2200: 2196: 2192: 2188: 2187: 2186: 2185: 2182: 2175: 2174: 2165: 2161: 2157: 2153: 2152: 2149: 2145: 2136: 2135: 2134: 2133: 2130: 2126: 2122: 2117: 2116: 2115: 2114: 2107: 2106: 2097: 2093: 2089: 2085: 2084: 2079: 2078: 2077: 2076: 2073: 2069: 2065: 2061: 2057: 2056: 2055: 2054: 2047: 2046: 2037: 2033: 2029: 2025: 2024: 2021: 2017: 2011: 2007: 2006: 2005: 2004: 2001: 1997: 1993: 1988: 1987: 1986: 1985: 1977: 1976: 1967: 1963: 1957: 1956: 1955: 1954: 1951: 1947: 1943: 1938: 1937: 1936: 1935: 1928: 1927: 1922: 1918: 1914: 1910: 1909: 1908: 1907: 1900: 1899: 1894: 1890: 1886: 1882: 1881: 1880: 1879: 1872: 1871: 1866: 1862: 1858: 1854: 1853: 1852: 1851: 1843: 1842: 1837: 1833: 1829: 1825: 1824: 1823: 1822: 1818: 1814: 1810: 1809: 1800: 1796: 1791:Sounds good. 1790: 1789: 1788: 1787: 1784: 1780: 1776: 1771: 1770: 1769: 1768: 1764: 1763: 1754: 1750: 1744: 1743: 1742: 1741: 1738: 1734: 1730: 1725: 1724: 1723: 1722: 1717: 1716: 1707: 1703: 1697: 1696: 1695: 1694: 1691: 1687: 1683: 1678: 1677: 1676: 1675: 1670: 1669: 1668: 1664: 1652: 1648: 1644: 1638: 1633: 1632: 1631: 1626: 1622: 1613: 1608: 1606: 1601: 1597: 1588: 1583: 1582: 1581: 1577: 1573: 1569: 1565: 1564: 1563: 1562: 1557: 1553: 1537: 1533: 1529: 1525: 1524: 1521: 1517: 1511: 1510: 1509: 1508: 1503: 1502: 1501: 1500: 1492: 1491: 1484: 1483: 1482: 1481: 1474: 1473: 1467: 1466: 1465: 1464: 1460: 1456: 1455: 1449: 1448: 1447: 1446: 1442: 1441: 1435: 1434: 1433: 1432: 1424: 1423: 1414: 1410: 1404: 1403: 1402: 1401: 1397: 1396: 1395: 1394: 1390: 1389: 1383: 1382: 1381: 1380: 1373: 1372: 1366: 1365: 1364: 1363: 1356: 1355: 1346: 1342: 1336: 1335: 1334: 1333: 1329: 1328: 1327: 1326: 1319: 1318: 1305: 1301: 1297: 1293: 1292: 1289: 1285: 1278: 1277: 1276: 1272: 1268: 1263: 1262: 1259: 1255: 1247: 1243: 1238: 1237: 1236: 1235: 1230: 1229: 1228: 1227: 1220: 1219: 1213: 1212: 1211: 1210: 1206: 1205: 1199: 1198: 1197: 1196: 1192: 1191: 1185: 1184: 1183: 1182: 1175: 1174: 1165: 1161: 1157: 1153: 1152: 1149: 1145: 1139: 1138: 1137: 1136: 1131: 1130: 1129: 1128: 1124: 1120: 1115: 1114: 1105: 1101: 1094: 1093: 1092: 1091: 1086: 1085: 1084: 1083: 1079: 1078: 1072: 1071: 1070: 1069: 1065: 1061: 1060: 1047: 1043: 1039: 1035: 1034: 1031: 1027: 1020: 1019: 1018: 1014: 1010: 1006: 1005: 1002: 998: 992: 984: 983: 982: 981: 977: 972: 969: 968: 967: 966: 962: 958: 954: 953: 947: 946: 945: 944: 939: 938: 932: 931: 930: 929: 926: 925:duplinks tool 922: 918: 917: 908: 904: 898: 897: 896: 895: 890: 889: 888: 887: 883: 882: 881: 874: 871: 865: 861: 860:contributions 857: 853: 852:Homeostasis07 849: 845: 844: 843: 839: 835: 831: 830:Homeostasis07 827: 826: 825: 824: 820: 819:contributions 816: 812: 811:Homeostasis07 804: 800: 796: 795: 794: 793: 789: 783: 782: 781: 775: 774: 773: 772: 768: 762: 761: 760: 758: 750: 749: 748: 747: 743: 737: 736: 735: 729: 728: 727: 726: 719: 715: 711: 710: 709: 708: 701: 697: 696: 691: 690: 689: 687: 679: 678: 677: 671: 670: 669: 668: 664: 662: 654: 650: 649: 648: 647: 643: 637: 634: 628: 624: 620: 616: 610: 605: 604: 603: 599: 595: 591: 587: 586: 585: 584: 580: 576: 568: 565: 562: 561: 560: 554: 551: 549: 548: 544: 540: 536: 526: 522: 518: 514: 510: 509: 508: 507: 506: 502: 498: 494: 490: 489: 488: 487: 483: 479: 466: 462: 458: 454: 453: 452: 451: 448: 444: 440: 435: 434: 429: 428: 423: 419: 415: 409: 404: 400: 399: 398: 397: 394: 390: 386: 381: 376: 375: 374: 373: 369: 368: 367: 366: 361: 360: 354: 353: 352: 351: 347: 346: 341: 340: 335: 334: 330: 329: 323: 322: 321: 320: 316: 315: 309: 308: 307: 306: 301: 300: 294: 293: 292: 291: 287: 283: 279: 275: 274: 269: 265: 264: 255: 251: 247: 243: 242: 241: 240: 237: 233: 229: 224: 223: 222: 221: 220: 216: 212: 208: 204: 196: 192: 188: 183: 182: 181: 180: 177: 173: 169: 165: 161: 160: 159: 158: 156: 151: 147: 146: 145: 144: 140: 136: 132: 124: 121: 119: 118: 114: 110: 105: 101: 93: 92: 88: 84: 78: 77: 74: 71: 68: 66: 63: 59: 55: 51: 44: 42: 37: 32: 27: 26: 19: 3895: 3892: 3863:Closing note 3862: 3826: 3791: 3479:says to use 3265: 3264: 3212: 3185: 3106: 3100: 3095: 2831: 2792: 2674:is a replica 2612: 2492: 2473: 2181:WP:EASTEREGG 2059: 1816: 1812: 1659: 1546: 1458: 1405:Good catch. 1245: 1241: 990: 975: 960: 956: 878: 872: 847: 808: 803:The Big Boss 802: 799:The Big Boss 798: 791: 790: 787: 779: 770: 769: 766: 757:martial arts 756: 754: 745: 744: 741: 733: 724: 723: 706: 705: 693: 685: 683: 675: 666: 665: 658: 645: 644: 641: 635: 614: 572: 558: 552: 534: 533: 512: 475: 431: 344: 337: 332: 285: 281: 277: 271: 267: 154: 149: 128: 122: 103: 97: 80: 49: 47: 35: 28: 3790:What makes 3238:Laser brain 3009:MOS:SURNAME 2878:performance 2010:WP:FILMPLOT 3848:Nikkimaria 3829:Nikkimaria 3796:Nikkimaria 3702:Nikkimaria 3684:Nikkimaria 3658:Nikkimaria 3626:Nikkimaria 3590:Nikkimaria 3586:WP:PAGENUM 3513:Nikkimaria 3460:Nikkimaria 3412:Nikkimaria 3397:Nikkimaria 3371:Nikkimaria 3329:Nikkimaria 3289:Nikkimaria 3209:Coord note 539:Nikkimaria 3871:WP:FAC/ar 3867:candidate 3792:Fightland 3506:cite book 3378:WP:ROTTEN 3309:WP:ROTTEN 3307:FN1: see 2613:Fightlnad 2189:Changed. 1773:credits. 1123:WP:ROTTEN 1064:WP:INTEXT 718:Ouroboros 226:instead. 100:Bruce Lee 3865:: This 3245:Ealdgyth 3231:Ian Rose 3215:Ealdgyth 3096:The Crow 2908:sailor"? 2554:checking 1982:sentence 1119:MOS:FILM 873:Comments 714:pedagogy 636:Comments 619:Pseud 14 590:Pseud 14 575:Pseud 14 553:Comments 402:shortly. 310:Changed. 273:The Crow 123:Comments 54:Ealdgyth 50:promoted 3345:Fixed. 3186:support 2484:stolen. 2474:Kung Fu 1459:Kung Fu 1133:matter. 892:future. 848:support 746:Casting 615:support 513:support 455:Fixed. 345:Kung Fu 3769:Fixed. 3529:Done. 3107:Dragon 3101:Dragon 2984:Done. 2712:Done. 2493:Dragon 2451:Done. 2154:Done. 2086:Done. 1294:Done. 1036:Done. 991:Dragon 976:Dragon 957:Dragon 921:MOS:DL 707:Themes 661:biopic 653:biopic 535:Images 517:Aoba47 493:Aoba47 478:Aoba47 439:Aoba47 408:Aoba47 385:Aoba47 355:Fixed. 324:Fixed. 282:Dragon 268:Dragon 228:Aoba47 168:Aoba47 155:Dragon 150:Dragon 135:Aoba47 104:Dragon 58:FACBot 3741:Done. 3565:WP:FA 3280:them. 1450:Done. 1384:Done. 1232:film? 1088:lead. 380:essay 303:time. 16:< 3852:talk 3837:talk 3815:this 3800:talk 3710:talk 3688:talk 3670:talk 3648:talk 3630:talk 3612:talk 3594:talk 3535:talk 3517:talk 3490:talk 3464:talk 3422:talk 3401:talk 3387:talk 3351:talk 3333:talk 3293:talk 3256:talk 3219:talk 3196:talk 3192:NTox 3176:talk 3168:NTox 3158:talk 3150:NTox 3136:talk 3117:talk 3113:NTox 3078:talk 3065:talk 3061:NTox 3044:talk 3028:talk 3024:NTox 3011:and 2990:talk 2974:talk 2970:NTox 2942:talk 2938:NTox 2922:talk 2891:talk 2860:talk 2852:NTox 2840:talk 2836:NTox 2817:talk 2805:talk 2801:NTox 2791:The 2776:talk 2762:well 2746:talk 2718:talk 2690:talk 2659:talk 2655:NTox 2639:talk 2621:talk 2588:talk 2584:NTox 2568:talk 2539:talk 2535:NTox 2519:talk 2501:talk 2457:talk 2428:talk 2400:talk 2396:NTox 2379:talk 2353:talk 2321:talk 2309:talk 2305:NTox 2289:talk 2261:talk 2229:talk 2216:talk 2212:NTox 2195:talk 2160:talk 2148:talk 2144:NTox 2125:talk 2092:talk 2068:talk 2032:talk 2020:talk 2016:NTox 1996:talk 1966:talk 1962:NTox 1946:talk 1917:talk 1889:talk 1861:talk 1832:talk 1799:talk 1795:NTox 1779:talk 1753:talk 1749:NTox 1733:talk 1706:talk 1702:NTox 1686:talk 1647:talk 1637:NTox 1625:talk 1621:NTox 1600:talk 1596:NTox 1576:talk 1568:NTox 1556:talk 1552:NTox 1532:talk 1520:talk 1516:NTox 1497:film 1413:talk 1409:NTox 1345:talk 1341:NTox 1300:talk 1288:talk 1284:NTox 1271:talk 1258:talk 1254:NTox 1160:talk 1148:talk 1144:NTox 1104:talk 1100:NTox 1042:talk 1030:talk 1026:NTox 1013:talk 1001:talk 997:NTox 907:talk 903:NTox 856:talk 838:talk 815:talk 667:Plot 646:Lead 623:talk 598:talk 579:talk 543:talk 521:talk 501:talk 482:talk 461:talk 443:talk 418:talk 389:talk 284:and 250:talk 232:talk 215:talk 191:talk 172:talk 139:talk 131:here 113:talk 87:talk 62:talk 56:via 3885:bot 3700:Hi 3656:Hi 3584:is 2850:Hi 1815:or 828:Hi 686:her 52:by 3881:}} 3875:{{ 3854:) 3839:) 3802:) 3712:) 3690:) 3672:) 3650:) 3632:) 3614:) 3596:) 3588:. 3537:) 3519:) 3511:. 3509:}} 3503:{{ 3492:) 3466:) 3424:) 3403:) 3389:) 3353:) 3335:) 3295:) 3258:) 3221:) 3194:· 3178:) 3160:) 3138:) 3115:· 3080:) 3063:· 3046:) 3026:· 2992:) 2972:· 2940:· 2924:) 2893:) 2862:) 2838:· 2819:) 2803:· 2778:) 2748:) 2720:) 2692:) 2657:· 2641:) 2623:) 2586:· 2570:) 2537:· 2521:) 2503:) 2495:. 2459:) 2430:) 2398:· 2381:) 2355:) 2323:) 2307:· 2291:) 2263:) 2231:) 2214:· 2197:) 2162:) 2146:· 2127:) 2094:) 2070:) 2034:) 2018:· 1998:) 1964:· 1948:) 1919:) 1891:) 1863:) 1834:) 1797:· 1781:) 1751:· 1735:) 1704:· 1688:) 1649:) 1623:· 1598:· 1578:) 1554:· 1534:) 1518:· 1411:· 1343:· 1302:) 1286:· 1273:) 1256:· 1162:) 1146:· 1102:· 1044:) 1028:· 1015:) 999:· 905:· 862:) 840:) 821:) 684:^ 625:) 617:. 600:) 581:) 545:) 523:) 503:) 484:) 463:) 445:) 420:) 391:) 252:) 234:) 217:) 193:) 174:) 141:) 115:) 89:) 67:. 33:. 3850:( 3835:( 3821:. 3798:( 3708:( 3686:( 3668:( 3646:( 3628:( 3610:( 3592:( 3533:( 3515:( 3488:( 3462:( 3420:( 3414:: 3410:@ 3399:( 3385:( 3373:: 3369:@ 3349:( 3331:( 3291:( 3254:( 3247:: 3243:@ 3240:: 3236:@ 3233:: 3229:@ 3217:( 3174:( 3156:( 3134:( 3076:( 3042:( 2988:( 2920:( 2889:( 2858:( 2815:( 2774:( 2744:( 2716:( 2688:( 2637:( 2619:( 2566:( 2517:( 2499:( 2455:( 2426:( 2377:( 2351:( 2319:( 2287:( 2259:( 2227:( 2193:( 2158:( 2123:( 2090:( 2066:( 2030:( 1994:( 1944:( 1915:( 1887:( 1859:( 1830:( 1777:( 1731:( 1684:( 1665:: 1661:@ 1645:( 1639:: 1635:@ 1614:: 1610:@ 1589:: 1585:@ 1574:( 1530:( 1298:( 1269:( 1248:. 1158:( 1040:( 1011:( 858:/ 854:( 836:( 817:/ 813:( 698:→ 621:( 611:: 607:@ 596:( 577:( 541:( 519:( 499:( 480:( 459:( 441:( 416:( 410:: 406:@ 387:( 248:( 230:( 213:( 189:( 170:( 137:( 111:( 85:( 60:(

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Knowledge

:Featured article candidates/Dragon: The Bruce Lee Story/archive1 - Knowledge

Index