172:
from some small area in the depths of
Brazilian Amazonia. It took people some time to realize that it is a distinct species, so that it was only described in 1998. The article underwent a thorough GA review by Sasata; I'm looking forward to any further suggestions for improvement and other comments.
618:
Is it unique in terms of being geographically very localized; in not overlapping any other member of the species; in having some unusual climate/terrain property, in some other sense not explained? Kind of what I was thinking when I saw that anyway.
583:
Their distribution is unique in the sense that no other muroid has a similar distribution—that's what the word means, I would think. The sources say nothing about gut contents, so I presume the collectors did not study them.
117:
496:
I've previously attempted to illustrate a similarly poorly known rice rat with a fair-use image, but consensus was (unfortunately) that such images are not allowed under the
579:
The ecology description of these creatures is pretty slim. Surely there is some dietary information from the captured specimens? In what sense is their distribution unique?
493:
I'm bothered by the lack of illustrations. At least one photograph of the subject should be included for visual reference, even if it is employed under fair use.
697:
I have been interrupted reading this article a few times in the last day or two! I fixed a couple of redirects. Nothing else jumps out as prominently tweakable.
40:
88:
83:
92:
200:
Should it? Only the distribution of this species is relevant to this article; exactly where each of the other species occurs is less relevant.
75:
500:. Incidentally, there are probably no photographs of live individuals of this species; there are only photographs of study skins and skulls.
30:
17:
609:
I am unable to think of any conceivable other meaning of the sentence, but I reworded it to remove whatever ambiguity I may have missed.
759:
739:
712:
688:
662:
653:
613:
588:
556:
540:
520:
504:
463:
443:
424:
414:
277:
258:
249:
227:
218:
204:
195:
177:
160:
512:
In the lead, how long is "long" when describing the fur? What is "brownish"? Couldn't you say tawny brown with a gray-white underbelly?
594:
The use of the word 'unique' in the article is ambiguous and implies some sort of special status, so some clarification would be good.
183:
133:
138:
755:
708:
516:
I've added hair length in the body; I think it's too much of a detail to include in the lead. I've also specified the color.
173:(If someone wants to check for plagiarism, all the sources I used for this article happen to be accessible for free online.)
79:
209:
If only the distribution of one species is relevant then the distribution of only one species should be given
264:
237:
459:
71:
64:
548:
Please create stub articles for the red linked jargon, or else redirect them to an appropriate article.
273:
245:
214:
191:
732:
724:
438:
409:
454:: Sources and citations look fine. No opportunities for spotchecking, but no reasons for concern.
749:
702:
370:
The IUCN currently lists
Euryoryzomys emmonsae as "Data Deficient" because it is so poorly known.
455:
528:
In the sentence that begins "The upperparts are tawny brown", is this back to discussing the
736:
659:
647:
624:
610:
601:
585:
566:
553:
537:
517:
501:
477:
421:
255:
224:
201:
174:
157:
53:
489:—Overall a decent article, if a bit technical in a couple of places. I have a few concerns:
682:
269:
241:
210:
187:
372:
I understand this, but do we have any indication at all whether it's common in its range?
497:
431:
402:
745:
698:
109:
643:
620:
597:
562:
473:
310:
728:
677:
169:
552:
All jargon is explained; there is no requirement in FAs for links to be red.
379:
Neither Musser et al. (1998) nor the Red List give any explicit indication.
39:
Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in
118:
Featured article candidates/Euryoryzomys emmonsae/archive1
143:
719:
105:
101:
97:
57:
744:Aha, ok. Is the word on wiktionary I wonder....?
774:The above discussion is preserved as an archive.
658:Thank you for your review; I've responded above.
186:should identify all the colours used in the key
43:. No further edits should be made to this page.
780:No further edits should be made to this page.
429:No other concerns, changed to support above,
29:The following is an archived discussion of a
8:
122:
41:Knowledge talk:Featured article candidates
675:- no dabs, no external link problems. --
125:
115:
472:—Most of my concerns were addressed.—
18:Knowledge:Featured article candidates
7:
184:File:Euryoryzomys_distribution.png
24:
386:Can you name the protected area?
723:the redirects, both because of
313:), please check, no dead links
1:
760:20:10, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
740:14:16, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
731:really shouldn't redirect to
713:14:13, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
464:15:48, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
444:13:09, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
425:12:42, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
415:08:36, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
328:In the context of this report
278:22:06, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
259:21:14, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
250:20:56, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
228:12:42, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
219:09:24, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
205:13:37, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
196:07:58, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
178:22:28, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
161:22:28, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
689:22:17, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
663:22:22, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
654:21:22, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
614:23:04, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
589:22:22, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
557:22:22, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
541:22:22, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
521:22:22, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
505:22:22, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
31:featured article nomination
797:
777:Please do not modify it.
56:16:26, 15 December 2010
36:Please do not modify it.
420:Thanks for the review!
302:Eek, another rice rat!
530:Euryoryzomys emmonsae
72:Euryoryzomys emmonsae
65:Euryoryzomys emmonsae
733:arboreal locomotion
532:? This is unclear.
309:I fixed one dab (
164:
151:
150:
788:
779:
722:
685:
680:
441:
434:
412:
405:
265:WP:FA Criteria 3
238:WP:FA Criteria 3
154:
123:
113:
95:
48:The article was
38:
796:
795:
791:
790:
789:
787:
786:
785:
784:
775:
718:
683:
678:
439:
432:
410:
403:
86:
70:
68:
34:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
794:
792:
783:
782:
769:
767:
766:
765:
764:
763:
762:
670:
669:
668:
667:
666:
665:
639:
638:
637:
636:
635:
634:
633:
632:
631:
630:
576:
575:
574:
573:
572:
545:
544:
543:
525:
524:
523:
509:
508:
507:
483:
452:Sources review
449:
448:
447:
446:
399:
398:
397:
396:
395:
394:
388:
387:
383:
382:
381:
380:
374:
373:
366:
365:
364:
363:
357:
356:
345:
344:
343:
342:
336:
335:
332:In this report
324:
323:
322:
321:
315:
314:
304:
303:
293:
292:
291:
290:
289:
288:
287:
286:
285:
284:
283:
282:
281:
280:
166:
165:
156:Nominator(s):
149:
148:
147:
146:
144:External links
141:
136:
128:
127:
121:
120:
67:
62:
61:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
793:
781:
778:
772:
771:
770:
761:
757:
754:
751:
747:
743:
742:
741:
738:
734:
730:
726:
721:
716:
715:
714:
710:
707:
704:
700:
696:
693:
692:
691:
690:
687:
686:
681:
674:
664:
661:
657:
656:
655:
651:
650:
645:
641:
640:
628:
627:
622:
617:
616:
615:
612:
608:
607:
605:
604:
599:
595:
592:
591:
590:
587:
582:
581:
580:
577:
570:
569:
564:
561:Fair enough.—
560:
559:
558:
555:
551:
550:
549:
546:
542:
539:
535:
534:
533:
531:
526:
522:
519:
515:
514:
513:
510:
506:
503:
499:
495:
494:
492:
491:
490:
488:
484:
481:
480:
475:
471:
468:
467:
466:
465:
461:
457:
453:
445:
442:
437:
435:
428:
427:
426:
423:
419:
418:
417:
416:
413:
408:
406:
392:
391:
390:
389:
385:
384:
378:
377:
376:
375:
371:
368:
367:
361:
360:
359:
358:
354:
350:
349:both of those
347:
346:
340:
339:
338:
337:
333:
329:
326:
325:
319:
318:
317:
316:
312:
308:
307:
306:
305:
301:
300:
295:
294:
279:
275:
271:
268:
266:
262:
261:
260:
257:
254:Map changed.
253:
252:
251:
247:
243:
239:
236:
235:
231:
230:
229:
226:
222:
221:
220:
216:
212:
208:
207:
206:
203:
199:
198:
197:
193:
189:
185:
182:
181:
180:
179:
176:
171:
163:
162:
159:
153:
152:
145:
142:
140:
137:
135:
132:
131:
130:
129:
124:
119:
116:
114:
111:
107:
103:
99:
94:
90:
85:
81:
77:
73:
66:
63:
60:
58:
55:
51:
44:
42:
37:
32:
27:
26:
19:
776:
773:
768:
752:
727:and because
725:WP:NOTBROKEN
705:
694:
676:
673:DAB/EL Check
672:
671:
648:
625:
602:
593:
578:
567:
547:
529:
527:
511:
486:
485:
478:
469:
456:Brianboulton
451:
450:
430:
401:
400:
369:
352:
348:
331:
327:
298:
296:
263:
233:
232:
167:
155:
139:Citation bot
69:
49:
47:
35:
28:
642:Thank you.—
536:Clarified.
440:talk to me?
411:talk to me?
393:Yes, added.
311:metacentric
267:met in full
54:Laser brain
729:scansorial
717:Thanks; I
270:Fasach Nua
242:Fasach Nua
240:per above
211:Fasach Nua
188:Fasach Nua
168:This is a
433:Jimfbleak
404:Jimfbleak
223:Will do.
756:contribs
746:Casliber
720:restored
709:contribs
699:Casliber
619:Thanks.—
299:Comments
297:Support
170:rice rat
134:Analysis
50:promoted
695:Support
487:Comment
470:Support
320:Thanks.
126:Toolbox
89:protect
84:history
737:Ucucha
660:Ucucha
611:Ucucha
586:Ucucha
554:Ucucha
538:Ucucha
518:Ucucha
502:Ucucha
422:Ucucha
256:Ucucha
234:Oppose
225:Ucucha
202:Ucucha
175:Ucucha
158:Ucucha
93:delete
110:views
102:watch
98:links
16:<
750:talk
703:talk
679:Pres
649:talk
626:talk
603:talk
568:talk
498:NFCC
479:talk
460:talk
362:Yes.
353:both
341:Yes.
274:talk
246:talk
215:talk
192:talk
106:logs
80:talk
76:edit
644:RJH
621:RJH
598:RJH
563:RJH
474:RJH
52:by
758:)
735:.
711:)
652:)
606:)
462:)
436:-
407:-
351:—
330:—
276:)
248:)
217:)
194:)
108:|
104:|
100:|
96:|
91:|
87:|
82:|
78:|
59:.
33:.
753:·
748:(
706:·
701:(
684:N
646:(
629:)
623:(
600:(
596:—
571:)
565:(
482:)
476:(
458:(
355:?
334:?
272:(
244:(
213:(
190:(
112:)
74:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.