842:"The next day, an anomalous blocking pattern prevented the disturbance from continuing along a seasonal northeasterly track." – "Anomalous blocking pattern" is quite jargony, and "seasonal" has an unclear meaning. Since tropical disturbances are exceedingly rare (unseasonal) during this time, can we really consider a northeasterly track to be "seasonal"? May I suggest "The next day, an unseasonable air pattern blocked the disturbance from continuing along its northeasterly path." I chose "air" because it's simplest in its conveyance, but alternatives are welcome (maybe sth with "steering" or "current").
1248:" All these factors indicated its transition into a subtropical cyclone by 18:00 UTC on January 12, receiving the name Alex from the National Hurricane Center. Though relatively shallow, owing to the seasonally low level of the tropopause, convection was deemed intense enough for classification." It seems to me that the position of these two sentences might perhaps be swapped for clarity. Plus the grammar of the first is a wee bit off; the factors didn't receive anything. ♦
1337:"Other atmospheric factors, as shown in the case of Alex, are the dominant factor" First, "other factors are the dominant factor" sounds a bit odd. Second, please forgive my obtuseness, but could you please list the specific features you had in mind? I mean... you can list them on this page, but... I'm not sure the article really made this point clearly enough either. Perhaps it did, but I am not sure. So I am asking. Thank you. ♦
157:- this might be confusing to readers, as to what extratropical, subtropical, and tropical are, especially if they are in the same sentence. I suggest making it more basic, such as - "Hurricane Alex originated as an extratropical cyclone near the Bahamas." Save the "first tropical cyclone" bit for when you say "As it turned north-northeast, Alex transitioned into a full-fledged tropical cyclone on January 14 and became a hurricane."
974:"An eye feature soon appeared within a complex of several banding features, marking intensification. The 20 mi (25 km) wide feature cleared out early on January 14 and was surrounded by a ring of −75 °F (−60 °C) cloud tops." – Technically fine, but for the sake of layman comprehension, can we somehow link the eye feature to its location at the core/center of the system, especially in the context of "cleared out"?
1049:"The hurricane indirectly led to one death—the person suffered a heart attack unrelated to the storm—when an emergency helicopter was unable to take off due to turbulent conditions." – How about "One person suffering a heart attack died as an indirect result of Alex when turbulent conditions hindered the emergency helicopter from taking off in time"?
910:"Though relatively shallow, owing to the seasonally low level of the tropopause, convection was deemed intense enough for classification." This reads as an afterthought that is needlessly divergent in its technicality, and can also be included more simply in the list of factors/structural changes (perhaps as "intense albeit shallow convection").
905:"alongside the system being co-located with an upper-level low, indicated its transition into a subtropical cyclone by 18:00 UTC" – Why is being co-located with an upper-level low an indication for subtropical formation, and why is it singled out? Can we maybe expound here and include this into the list of factors in the previous sentence?
1398:"Alex develops a well-defined eye and core structure..." So in the text we have "allowing the cyclone to acquire a deeper warm core with upper-level outflow ... Alex continued to deepen" So what's the definition of a well-defined core.. they're deep? they have upper-level outflow? ... and which source says when that happened exactly? ♦
931:"The trough that previously enabled the sharp southward turn later steered Alex to the east-northeast and eventually north-northeast." – Current phrasing puts (presumably unwanted) emphasis on the trough over the change in movement, and this is the first time we read that its previous turn was a sharp one.
231:"Though relatively shallow, owing to the seasonally low level of the tropopause, convection was deemed deep enough for classification." - good met details, but could you rewrite it to make it simpler for the layman? The "seasonally low level of the tropopause" threw me for a second. I suggest reordering.
101:
in
January 2016 was one of the more anomalous hurricanes on record within the Atlantic basin. Its development marked the third-known occurrence of a hurricane-force tropical cyclone in January, with records extending back to 1851. The article is a bit more technical than would normally be expected,
581:
Still a little rough around the edges and perhaps overly technical in spots, but I suppose that's just the nature of this sort of article – the vast majority of readers are already going to be weather enthusiasts who already know most of the jargon. No-doubt the most comprehensive account of the
105:
I've gone ahead and looked for any additional information that may have arose in the years since I initially wrote the article and added the little I found. As such, this the article is as comprehensive as can be. It's been a few years since my last nomination, so apologies if I'm a bit rusty. ~
819:
Reading through it now and making changes to the prose as I go. Following Julian's comment above, the writing in parts of the MH, while understandably so given Alex's complex cyclogenesis, is quite technical. I had difficulties understanding the narrative at times, so I imagine those who are
1305:": frontal boundaries separated from the core of the cyclone; its core became symmetric; it became co-located with an upper-level low; and convection developed atop the circulation." OK this is nitpicky but I'm 95% sure that we are supposed to use commas to separate items in a list
1468:
Support in full on criteria 1, 2 and 4. All but my most nitpicky concerns have been sufficiently addressed, so I will be happy to see this innovative and well-research account on such a climatologically unusual system receive its star. Thanks for your diligence, CB <3
102:
but there are hopefully enough explanations for lay readers to understand. The most notable aspects of this system is the meteorology of it, so that's where the focus lies. It did have some impact to people in
Bermuda and the Azores; however, it was relatively minor.
1349:
Swapped the second "factor" for a synonym. The factors it's referring to are the upper-level outflow, instability, and wind shear (the latter of which was added after your comments) which are mentioned in the third paragraph of the meteorological history. ~
284:
I appreciate that you have the structural evolution of Alex. I suggest you add another image for
January 15th, after the storm weakened and when it struck the Azores. This way, we have satellite imagery of the historic January landfall. Your call though.
887:
There's no earlier mention of the fronts that I can find to support adding it earlier. It's largely implied that the system had frontal boundaries by being an extratropical cyclone, but without supporting refs I can't make an explicit mention. ~
195:
When Alex made landfall on
Terceira as a strong tropical storm this marked only the second time that an Atlantic tropical cyclone has made landfall in January, with the other being Hurricane Alice of 1955 which made landfall on Saint Martin and
1288:
Operational assessments refer to the in-situ advisories whereas the earlier mentioned classification is from the post-storm analysis. Mention of this difference isn't terribly important so I went ahead and removed it to avoid confusion. ~
221:- the "was accompanied" is uncertain to me. Did they happen in tandem, or the result of? Also, the "and the transition to a more symmetric structure" seems important, but it might be too jargon-y for the layman to appreciate what happened.
1185:
Ref 42 (PT): source material is slightly mistranslated. Ponta
Delgada reported six fallen trees, one destroyed roof, one flooded street, six landslides, and damage to six buildings. Nowhere does it state that the damage was caused by
851:
development (tropical cyclogenesis is mentioned earlier). Can we have some sort of explanation here why the NHC was calling for this subtropical, instead of the former tropical, development, or something to link the two ideas?
1128:
Ref 28 b): Slightly picky, but the source does not quite make the distinct link between convective decay and the start of extratropical transition like the article does; they just forecast the transition to succeed the
1366:"Alex develops a well-defined eye and core structure..." So in the text we have "An eye feature soon appeared at the center of the cyclone's spiral bands, marking intensification." But the source says Alex had been
499:
It would likely be way too clunky and have mixed messages. The current definition by the NHC is that the highest likelihood of cyclogenesis is within that period even if the maxima is concentrated in late summer. ~
878:"Slight weakening took place on January 11." – This is a terse, somewhat abrupt ending to the paragraph, and disconnectedly contrasting with the preceding information about warmer (more favorable) waters.
257:
As it moved away from the upper-level low it was previously situated under, Alex acquired a deeper warm core and upper-level outflow became established, indicating the system was becoming more tropical.
161:
On
January 12, it developed into a subtropical cyclone well south of the Azores, becoming the first tropical or subtropical system during January in the North Atlantic since an unnamed storm in 1978.
677:
Just a note that this has been on the
Urgents list for a while and really needs a bit more substantive review to push it over the line. Maybe you can ping some editors active in the topic area? --
559:- The source (disco #4) says upper-level temps were "significantly colder than the tropical mean", which I don't believe is the same as being anomalously cold for that location. Thoughts?
535:
There may still be some nuggets to glean from the TCR. The shortwave that gave the pre-Alex frontal low a shot in the arm is one example. Anomalously warm SSTs after the 10th is another.
883:"frontal boundaries separated from the core of the cyclone;" – "separated" implies the boundaries existed prior, but this is the first time we encounter this (somewhat jargony) term.
312:
Gusts to 60 mph (97 km/h) disrupted air travel, downed trees, and left sporadic power outages, while waves as high as 20 ft (6 m) necessitated small craft advisories for the islands.
1309:
one of those items itself contains a comma. In that case a semicolon is used. None of those independent clauses in that list contains a comma, so semicolons are not recommended. ♦
202:
In addition to forming well outside of hurricane season, Alex developed unusually far north and east, becoming only the second hurricane to form north of 30°N and east of 30°W.
288:
The gallery is meant more for the evolution from extratropical to tropical. Adding more would just make it a gallery of its life and would necessitate several more images. ~
354:
I believe I've addressed all the above concerns and responded to some directly. Please look over the changes to make sure they're sufficient. Thank you for the review! ~
317:
This last comment is rather nitpicky, but you have a pic of the waves in the Azores, without any textual mention. Could you add anything about surf/waves in the Azores?
281:- I think I know what that means, but I worry the user might. I suggest using "asymmetrical" instead of "tilted", since you mentioned earlier the symmetrical structure.
1028:"Furthermore, the overall structure became more "comma shaped" as a consequence of frontal systems" – What frontal systems, and why does this result in a comma shape?
571:- The hyper-local place names don't do much to help our understanding of the storm's impact. I'd eliminate them and just say broadly that ferries were out of service.
496:– It's hard to say which "period" has the greatest probability of tropical cyclogenesis without defining that period. Is there another way to frame this explanation?
914:
Used the suggested phrase and added it to the the list of changes as suggested. Note explaining why shallow is specified was kept at the end of the sentence. ~
40:
465:
Removed the mention of 1938 here. Clarifying the distinction in the lead is a bit much and best left to
Background where its sufficiently explained. ~
1276:"Operationally, Alex was not classified as a subtropical storm until late on January 13" Huh? I thought it was classified as such the day before.. ♦
1494:
30:
17:
847:"Instead, the storm turned east-southeast into a region slightly more favorable for subtropical development." – This is the first time we mention
155:
The first tropical cyclone of the 2016 Atlantic hurricane season, Alex originated as an extratropical cyclone near the
Bahamas on January 7, 2016.
1007:"Becoming increasingly tilted due to shear" – Can we reword this to better explain what "tilted" means here? How does shear cause such a tilt?
634:
I believe I've addressed everything. Thank you for the review! If there's anything left or adjustments to new material, please let me know. ~
516:
Is it purely coincidence that Alex and Pali developed nearly at the same time, or have any sources discussed possible meteorological links?
1505:
173:
Concurrently, Alex began transitioning back into an extratropical cyclone; it completed this cycle hours after moving away from the Azores.
598:
One other thing I noticed: you specify the precursor system affected
Bermuda on January 8, but then include a three-day rainfall total. –
490:
I've always known "concurrent" to connote at least a partial spatial component, whereas "simultaneous" could be purely temporal. Just me?
1524:
1484:
1455:
1440:
1419:
1405:
1391:
1377:
1359:
1344:
1330:
1316:
1298:
1283:
1269:
1255:
1234:
1208:
1170:
1150:
1102:
1084:
1069:
1041:
1020:
997:
964:
944:
923:
897:
865:
835:
808:
781:
761:
740:
720:
690:
666:
643:
629:
609:
593:
528:
509:
474:
450:
424:
409:
383:
363:
348:
329:
297:
271:
243:
219:
The significant deepening was accompanied by a warm-core seclusion at the upper-levels and the transition to a more symmetric structure.
142:
115:
90:
873:"Concurrently, a warm-core seclusion at the upper-levels marked the transition to a more symmetric structure," – Can you simplify this?
1476:
1226:
1200:
1162:
1061:
989:
956:
827:
773:
732:
405:
228:
classified the storm. That's not in the text anywhere. I suggest somewhere around "Upon doing so, the system received the name Alex"
131:
The sources and references are all high quality, independent, and reliable. I appreciate you having archived many of the sources. ♫
1032:
Added "frontal boundaries" to the preceding sentence which mentioned the changes associated with the extratropical transition. ~
251:
The trough that previously enabled the sharp southward turn later steered Alex to the east-northeast and later north-northeast.
1155:
Thanks – the info checks out. I used to know how to do that, but I admit it's been a while since I've dabbled in sources ^^;
169:- since the previous sentence didn't mention a date, I think you should write out "January 15" here instead of "the next day"
519:
Only connection would be the ongoing El Niño but that's pure speculation and violates WP:OR. Pure coincidence otherwise. ~
337:
All in all, it is a very good article. My comments are relatively minor, and hopefully aren't too arduous to complete. ♫
462:
I'm not sure the opening line adequately highlights the distinction between being in January and forming in January.
541:- This should probably be removed unless you want to go down the rabbit hole of explaining what any of that means.
225:
198:- add a comma after storm, and I suggest the last part be split as an independent sentence, or add a semicolon
1436:
1415:
1387:
1355:
1326:
1294:
1265:
1146:
1098:
1080:
1037:
1016:
940:
919:
893:
861:
804:
757:
716:
639:
524:
505:
470:
420:
401:
378:
359:
343:
325:
293:
267:
239:
137:
111:
86:
1431:! I believe I've addressed everything. If there's anything else that needs adjusting please let me know. ~
1219:- Sources are reliable, of high quality, and are now formatted for consistency and to the standards of FA.
1478:
1228:
1202:
1164:
1063:
991:
958:
829:
775:
734:
664:
627:
607:
591:
569:
Ferry services to and from Cavello Bay, Dockyard, Belmont, Hodsdon’s Ferry, and Lower Ferry were suspended
685:
98:
72:
1141:
for verification purposes. Not sure how to properly cite a page that doesn't create a stable url. ~
443:
432:
1498:
167:
After weakening slightly, Alex made landfall on Terceira Island as a tropical storm the next day.
1520:
1452:
1432:
1411:
1402:
1383:
1374:
1351:
1341:
1322:
1313:
1290:
1280:
1261:
1252:
1142:
1094:
1076:
1033:
1012:
936:
915:
889:
857:
800:
753:
712:
635:
520:
501:
466:
416:
397:
373:
355:
338:
321:
289:
263:
235:
132:
107:
82:
1260:
This should be remedied now by the earlier suggestion by Auree. Adjusted the grammar as well. ~
1179:
Refs 13, 32 & 33: support all but could be better placed around their respective statements.
1470:
1220:
1194:
1156:
1090:
1055:
983:
950:
949:
Meant that the trough was the subject of the sentence rather than Alex - changed this myself.
821:
767:
747:
726:
706:
657:
620:
615:
600:
584:
1193:
Spot-checks suggest the article is factually accurate without close paraphrasing or copyvio.
1410:
Core structure refers to convective organization in this context. Specific refs: 4, 9, 23 ~
794:
678:
61:
1370:
to develop an eye. When did it become well-defined? Need another source? Or am I wrong? ♦
698:
487:"full-fledged" seems jarringly colloquial when bounded by otherwise very technical prose.
372:
Thank you for the quick replies! I'm happy to support now. Great work on this article. ♫
1497:
has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see
547:- Maybe change "deep" to "intense" to avoid confusion with "deep" in the synoptic sense?
711:
if any of you have time to give the article a look, it would be greatly appreciated! ~
539:
and thermal symmetry extended from the upper-levels to the surface through the cyclone.
1075:
Haven't forgotten, just been distracted/busy. Should be able to get to it tomorrow. ~
1516:
1449:
1428:
1399:
1371:
1338:
1310:
1277:
1249:
53:
856:
Outlook stated tropical or subtropical; added subtropical to the earlier mention. ~
191:- I don't think you need the "considered", since then I would ask, who considers it?
1089:
Thank you so much for taking the time to do this and dealing with my slow response
582:
storm available anywhere, so I'll be happy to support after some minor changes. –
494:
the period in which tropical cyclones are most likely to develop across the basin.
320:
The waves are mentioned in the sentence you pointed out in the above comment :P ~
557:
The transition was enabled by colder-than-average upper-tropospheric temperatures
1512:
702:
57:
1135:
Ref 31: links to a database site, so I can't retrieve the original source (!)
766:
Been more swamped than expected, sorry about that. Today is the day though!
553:- You need to indicate why deepening is not expected over 72-degree water.
482:
Slight weakening took place thereafter, and the system eventually turned
1119:
Refs 3, 5 & 6: support their statements without close paraphrasing.
725:
Yessiree. Will do a full-criteria review, including spot-checks, asap!
178:
You should mention Bermuda impacts in the lead, so as to be thorough.
39:
Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in
551:
Despite moving over 72 °F (22 °C) waters, Alex continued to deepen
1054:
That's it for now. Will do a source review and spot-check next.
396:
Image license and use seems OK to me. ALT text also looks fine.
484:→ "After weakening slightly, the system eventually turned..." ?
1138:
234:
Added a note clarifying why the tropopause is more shallow. ~
1125:
Refs 27 & 28 a): support the statement without synthesis.
442:
on prose. The article looked really good on my read through.
618:
about the power outages in Bermuda, if you're interested. –
577:- I'd move this (and maybe the Gordon tidbit) to background.
820:
less-versed in severe weather might not fare well either.
563:
Becoming increasingly asymmetrical with height due to shear
1011:
Simplifying to "disorganized" serves the same purpose. ~
935:
I'm unsure of what you mean by the unwanted emphasis. ~
65:
279:
Becoming increasingly tilted with height due to shear
1382:
Added a ref to the TCR to support this statement. ~
545:
convection was deemed deep enough for classification
655:after my comments were satisfactorily addressed. –
565:- Maybe just "tilted" would be easier on the eyes?
314:- I suggest splitting, but it works fine as it is.
1532:The above discussion is preserved as an archive.
189:Activity in January is considered extremely rare
41:Knowledge (XXG) talk:Featured article candidates
224:You should probably mention somewhere that the
43:. No further edits should be made to this page.
175:- I feel like these thoughts could be combined
1538:No further edits should be made to this page.
1511:template in place on the talk page until the
1122:Ref 9 a, b & c, p & q: all check out.
29:The following is an archived discussion of a
8:
262:I think splitting would make this clunky. ~
18:Knowledge (XXG):Featured article candidates
752:just a check in since it's been a week. ~
253:- avoid two "later"s in the same sentence
259:- suggest splitting into two sentences
1189:Refs 43 & 44 (PT): both check out.
7:
982:I'll go ahead and add this myself.
575:...only known hurricane to track...
415:Thank you for the image review! ~
24:
1209:22:50, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
1171:16:26, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
1151:21:57, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
1115:Note: I can read Portuguese.
1085:03:45, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
1070:17:36, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
836:17:36, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
782:14:59, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
762:17:55, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
741:18:56, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
721:06:59, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
1:
691:13:37, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
1525:03:53, 12 October 2019 (UTC)
1485:05:44, 10 October 2019 (UTC)
965:05:44, 10 October 2019 (UTC)
809:21:22, 10 October 2019 (UTC)
1506:featured article candidates
1456:21:54, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
1441:04:15, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
1420:04:15, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
1406:03:29, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
1392:04:15, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
1378:03:24, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
1360:04:15, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
1345:03:21, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
1331:04:15, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
1317:02:26, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
1299:04:15, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
1284:02:18, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
1270:04:15, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
1256:02:17, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
1235:15:40, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
1103:03:34, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
1042:03:34, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
1021:03:34, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
998:14:58, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
945:03:34, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
924:03:34, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
898:03:34, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
866:03:34, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
667:03:37, 10 August 2019 (UTC)
31:featured article nomination
1555:
1427:Thank you for the review,
644:21:52, 9 August 2019 (UTC)
630:13:41, 6 August 2019 (UTC)
610:13:34, 6 August 2019 (UTC)
594:03:50, 6 August 2019 (UTC)
529:21:52, 9 August 2019 (UTC)
510:21:52, 9 August 2019 (UTC)
475:21:52, 9 August 2019 (UTC)
121:Support from Hurricanehink
1464:Support from Hylian Auree
1448:Sounds good. Carry on. ♦
451:15:30, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
425:02:50, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
410:15:41, 29 July 2019 (UTC)
384:12:11, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
364:02:50, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
349:15:03, 29 July 2019 (UTC)
330:02:50, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
298:02:50, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
272:02:50, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
244:02:50, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
226:National Hurricane Center
143:16:05, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
116:18:58, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
91:18:58, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
1535:Please do not modify it.
1139:Screenshot through imgur
815:Review from Hylian Auree
163:- what about Zeta 05/06?
36:Please do not modify it.
1182:Ref 37 (PT): checks out
306:Preparations and impact
73:Hurricane Alex (2016)
1321:Swapped to commas ~
1243:Comments by Lingzhi
204:- second hurricane
1132:Ref 30: checks out
64:) 12 October 2019
1483:
1233:
1207:
1169:
1068:
996:
963:
834:
780:
739:
673:Coordinator notes
381:
346:
140:
94:
1546:
1537:
1510:
1504:
1501:, and leave the
1481:
1475:
1231:
1225:
1205:
1199:
1167:
1161:
1066:
1060:
994:
988:
961:
955:
832:
826:
798:
778:
772:
751:
737:
731:
710:
688:
683:
660:
623:
603:
587:
457:Comments from JC
448:
377:
342:
136:
81:Nominator(s): ~
79:
48:The article was
38:
1554:
1553:
1549:
1548:
1547:
1545:
1544:
1543:
1542:
1533:
1508:
1502:
1479:
1466:
1245:
1229:
1203:
1165:
1113:
1064:
992:
959:
830:
817:
792:
776:
745:
735:
696:
686:
679:
675:
658:
621:
601:
585:
459:
444:
436:
394:
123:
76:
34:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1552:
1550:
1541:
1540:
1528:
1527:
1515:goes through.
1465:
1462:
1461:
1460:
1459:
1458:
1425:
1424:
1423:
1422:
1396:
1395:
1394:
1364:
1363:
1362:
1335:
1334:
1333:
1303:
1302:
1301:
1274:
1273:
1272:
1244:
1241:
1240:
1239:
1238:
1237:
1191:
1190:
1187:
1183:
1180:
1177:
1176:
1175:
1174:
1173:
1133:
1130:
1126:
1123:
1120:
1112:
1109:
1108:
1107:
1106:
1105:
1052:
1051:
1046:
1045:
1044:
1025:
1024:
1023:
1003:
1002:
1001:
1000:
977:
976:
971:
970:
969:
968:
967:
928:
927:
926:
907:
902:
901:
900:
880:
875:
870:
869:
868:
844:
816:
813:
812:
811:
790:
789:
788:
787:
786:
785:
784:
674:
671:
670:
669:
649:
648:
647:
646:
579:
578:
572:
566:
560:
554:
548:
542:
536:
533:
532:
531:
514:
513:
512:
491:
488:
485:
479:
478:
477:
458:
455:
454:
453:
435:
433:Hurricane Noah
429:
428:
427:
393:
390:
389:
388:
387:
386:
367:
366:
335:
334:
333:
332:
315:
308:
307:
303:
302:
301:
300:
282:
276:
275:
274:
254:
248:
247:
246:
229:
222:
215:
214:
210:
209:
199:
192:
185:
184:
180:
179:
176:
170:
164:
158:
151:
150:
146:
145:
128:
127:
122:
119:
99:Hurricane Alex
96:
95:
75:
70:
69:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1551:
1539:
1536:
1530:
1529:
1526:
1522:
1518:
1514:
1507:
1500:
1496:
1492:
1489:
1488:
1487:
1486:
1482:
1477:
1474:
1473:
1463:
1457:
1454:
1451:
1447:
1446:
1445:
1444:
1443:
1442:
1438:
1434:
1433:Cyclonebiskit
1430:
1421:
1417:
1413:
1412:Cyclonebiskit
1409:
1408:
1407:
1404:
1401:
1397:
1393:
1389:
1385:
1384:Cyclonebiskit
1381:
1380:
1379:
1376:
1373:
1369:
1365:
1361:
1357:
1353:
1352:Cyclonebiskit
1348:
1347:
1346:
1343:
1340:
1336:
1332:
1328:
1324:
1323:Cyclonebiskit
1320:
1319:
1318:
1315:
1312:
1308:
1304:
1300:
1296:
1292:
1291:Cyclonebiskit
1287:
1286:
1285:
1282:
1279:
1275:
1271:
1267:
1263:
1262:Cyclonebiskit
1259:
1258:
1257:
1254:
1251:
1247:
1246:
1242:
1236:
1232:
1227:
1224:
1223:
1218:
1215:
1214:
1213:
1212:
1211:
1210:
1206:
1201:
1198:
1197:
1188:
1184:
1181:
1178:
1172:
1168:
1163:
1160:
1159:
1154:
1153:
1152:
1148:
1144:
1143:Cyclonebiskit
1140:
1137:
1136:
1134:
1131:
1127:
1124:
1121:
1118:
1117:
1116:
1110:
1104:
1100:
1096:
1095:Cyclonebiskit
1092:
1088:
1087:
1086:
1082:
1078:
1077:Cyclonebiskit
1074:
1073:
1072:
1071:
1067:
1062:
1059:
1058:
1050:
1047:
1043:
1039:
1035:
1034:Cyclonebiskit
1031:
1030:
1029:
1026:
1022:
1018:
1014:
1013:Cyclonebiskit
1010:
1009:
1008:
1005:
1004:
999:
995:
990:
987:
986:
981:
980:
979:
978:
975:
972:
966:
962:
957:
954:
953:
948:
947:
946:
942:
938:
937:Cyclonebiskit
934:
933:
932:
929:
925:
921:
917:
916:Cyclonebiskit
913:
912:
911:
908:
906:
903:
899:
895:
891:
890:Cyclonebiskit
886:
885:
884:
881:
879:
876:
874:
871:
867:
863:
859:
858:Cyclonebiskit
855:
854:
853:
850:
845:
843:
840:
839:
838:
837:
833:
828:
825:
824:
814:
810:
806:
802:
801:Cyclonebiskit
796:
791:
783:
779:
774:
771:
770:
765:
764:
763:
759:
755:
754:Cyclonebiskit
749:
744:
743:
742:
738:
733:
730:
729:
724:
723:
722:
718:
714:
713:Cyclonebiskit
708:
704:
700:
695:
694:
693:
692:
689:
684:
682:
672:
668:
665:
662:
661:
654:
651:
650:
645:
641:
637:
636:Cyclonebiskit
633:
632:
631:
628:
625:
624:
617:
614:
613:
612:
611:
608:
605:
604:
596:
595:
592:
589:
588:
576:
573:
570:
567:
564:
561:
558:
555:
552:
549:
546:
543:
540:
537:
534:
530:
526:
522:
521:Cyclonebiskit
518:
517:
515:
511:
507:
503:
502:Cyclonebiskit
498:
497:
495:
492:
489:
486:
483:
480:
476:
472:
468:
467:Cyclonebiskit
464:
463:
461:
460:
456:
452:
449:
447:
441:
438:
437:
434:
431:Support from
430:
426:
422:
418:
417:Cyclonebiskit
414:
413:
412:
411:
407:
406:contributions
403:
399:
398:Jo-Jo Eumerus
391:
385:
380:
375:
374:Hurricanehink
371:
370:
369:
368:
365:
361:
357:
356:Cyclonebiskit
353:
352:
351:
350:
345:
340:
339:Hurricanehink
331:
327:
323:
322:Cyclonebiskit
319:
318:
316:
313:
310:
309:
305:
304:
299:
295:
291:
290:Cyclonebiskit
287:
286:
283:
280:
277:
273:
269:
265:
264:Cyclonebiskit
261:
260:
258:
255:
252:
249:
245:
241:
237:
236:Cyclonebiskit
233:
232:
230:
227:
223:
220:
217:
216:
212:
211:
207:
203:
200:
197:
193:
190:
187:
186:
182:
181:
177:
174:
171:
168:
165:
162:
159:
156:
153:
152:
148:
147:
144:
139:
134:
133:Hurricanehink
130:
129:
126:Source review
125:
124:
120:
118:
117:
113:
109:
108:Cyclonebiskit
103:
100:
93:
92:
88:
84:
83:Cyclonebiskit
78:
77:
74:
71:
68:
66:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
37:
32:
27:
26:
19:
1534:
1531:
1491:Closing note
1490:
1471:
1467:
1426:
1367:
1306:
1221:
1216:
1195:
1192:
1157:
1114:
1091:Hylian Auree
1056:
1053:
1048:
1027:
1006:
984:
973:
951:
930:
909:
904:
882:
877:
872:
848:
846:
841:
822:
818:
768:
748:Hylian Auree
727:
707:Hylian Auree
680:
676:
659:Juliancolton
656:
652:
622:Juliancolton
619:
602:Juliancolton
599:
597:
586:Juliancolton
583:
580:
574:
568:
562:
556:
550:
544:
538:
493:
481:
445:
439:
395:
392:Image review
336:
311:
278:
256:
250:
218:
205:
201:
194:
188:
172:
166:
160:
154:
104:
97:
80:
49:
47:
35:
28:
849:subtropical
795:Laser brain
681:Laser brain
213:Met history
1129:weakening.
1111:Spotchecks
699:Jason Rees
183:Background
1499:WP:FAC/ar
1495:candidate
1186:flooding.
206:on record
1517:Ian Rose
1493:: This
1450:Lingzhi2
1429:Lingzhi2
1400:Lingzhi2
1372:Lingzhi2
1339:Lingzhi2
1311:Lingzhi2
1278:Lingzhi2
1250:Lingzhi2
54:Ian Rose
50:promoted
705:, and
653:Support
616:Details
440:Support
1453:(talk)
1403:(talk)
1375:(talk)
1368:trying
1342:(talk)
1314:(talk)
1307:unless
1281:(talk)
1253:(talk)
703:Titoxd
687:(talk)
58:FACBot
1472:Auree
1222:Auree
1196:Auree
1158:Auree
1057:Auree
985:Auree
952:Auree
823:Auree
769:Auree
728:Auree
196:Saba.
16:<
1521:talk
1437:chat
1416:chat
1388:chat
1356:chat
1327:chat
1295:chat
1266:chat
1217:Note
1147:chat
1099:chat
1093:! ~
1081:chat
1038:chat
1017:chat
941:chat
920:chat
894:chat
862:chat
805:chat
758:chat
717:chat
640:chat
525:chat
506:chat
471:chat
446:Noah
421:chat
402:talk
379:talk
360:chat
344:talk
326:chat
294:chat
268:chat
240:chat
149:Lead
138:talk
112:chat
87:chat
62:talk
56:via
1513:bot
382:)
347:)
141:)
52:by
1523:)
1509:}}
1503:{{
1439:)
1418:)
1390:)
1358:)
1329:)
1297:)
1268:)
1149:)
1101:)
1083:)
1040:)
1019:)
943:)
922:)
896:)
864:)
807:)
799:~
760:)
719:)
701:,
663:|
642:)
626:|
606:|
590:|
527:)
508:)
473:)
423:)
408:)
404:,
362:)
328:)
296:)
270:)
242:)
114:)
89:)
67:.
33:.
1519:(
1480:★
1435:(
1414:(
1386:(
1354:(
1325:(
1293:(
1264:(
1230:★
1204:★
1166:★
1145:(
1097:(
1079:(
1065:★
1036:(
1015:(
993:★
960:★
939:(
918:(
892:(
860:(
831:★
803:(
797::
793:@
777:★
756:(
750::
746:@
736:★
715:(
709::
697:@
638:(
523:(
504:(
469:(
419:(
400:(
376:(
358:(
341:(
324:(
292:(
266:(
238:(
208:?
135:(
110:(
85:(
60:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.