Knowledge

:Featured article candidates/Javan slow loris/archive1 - Knowledge

Source 📝

662:"In Indonesia it is sold as an exotic pet more frequently than it is used in traditional medicine, despite myths of it having magical and curative properties." The phrasing implies we (the readers) were expecting it to be mostly for its magical "uses". How about something like "In Indonesia, it is sold primarily as an exotic pet, though it is also used in traditional medicine as there are myths of it having magical and curative properties." or something. That's not perfect, but I think you'll get my point. 1033:
Are you quite certain that "It was first recognized as a distinct species again in a 2000 field guide on Indonesian primates" (an issue raised above) should not state the author directly, or at least the place of origin of the field guide? The fact that it was recognized as a separate species in 2000
818:
Thanks for the review, and don't worry about being overly critical. I prefer it. It makes me see the article from a completely different perspective, which ultimately makes the article stronger. Anyway, I'm busy at the moment, but will work on addressing any lingering concerns later this evening.
467:
I was probably going by the source when I wrote it, and it can be important to know where the specimens came from (if it's noted). I guess you could argue that the selection of specimens may have been previously altered by poacher for buyer preference... Using animals from a market is certainly an
688:
The problem here is that the papers that discuss this stuff cover all slow loris species (in general), and stories from Java itself don't necessarily differentiate the two slow loris species found on the island. The entire region has a lot of myths about animals and their magical properties,
1013:
This seems a little awkward. "He argued against grouping strepsirrhines with Insectivora (a now-abandoned biological grouping) and noted that the brain had features transitional between other primates and "inferior" mammals such as bats and carnivorans." Perhaps "He argued against grouping
1014:
strepsirrhines with the now-abandoned Insectivora and noted that the brain had features transitional between other primates and "inferior" mammals such as bats and carnivorans." However, I am still on the fence about whether or not Insectivora's abandonment is pertinent to the article.
788:"although "effective law enforcement with respect to wildlife protection laws is all but non-existent in Indonesia"." I think this is the kind of quote which should really be attributed in the prose. Who's saying this, and on what authority do they make this claim? 1017:
It is, because we need to summarize Flower's piece and do so in comprehensible terms. An explanation of a subject in a few words is not off-topic. I haven't used your edit, since it does not make clear that Insectivora is (was) a biological grouping, a
730:. Either way, the sources don't explicitly state the Javan slow loris when they talk about myths, but there may be one we could add that talks about a myth in Java if everyone's comfortable with it. Again, it will come from 429:
Yes, they are cited, but I'm not sure we want that much detail in the text. I added an "again" to address your second point: they were likely the first ones since the early 20th century at least to recognize it as a species.
117: 554:
Unfortunately, the source just lists the stats, making it hard to elaborate from that. Sometimes tables help with long lists, but in this case, I don't think that would be appropriate. –
236:
Could you please clarify your expectations because to me, the literature list is alphabetized. The Nekaris refs are a little tricky, but I've sorted them by last1 -: -->
927:
I read this some time ago, thought I'd already supported — I'm getting to be as slow as a loris. After J Milburn's thorough review, I can't see anything to query
426:"in a 2000 field guide on Indonesian primates" Do we know the title/author(s)? In any case, this is, surely, wrong- Saint-Hilaire saw it as a separate species! 188: 40: 634:
Distribution is perhaps worth merging with the above section; there's some information about its distribution which you've lumped in with "behaviour".
441:
There's a tiny bit of overlinking to other species, I feel. You "introduce" them (with common name, specific name and a link) several times apiece.
455:"from six specimens rescued from the illegal wildlife trade in Java," I'm not sure this information is necessary. It doesn't feel massively NPOV. 580:? You never give them names, nor link the term; the reference to them in the third para of Anatomy and physiology is confusing in this regard 458:
Not sure. The information that this is based on captive specimens may be good to have, because captive specimens may show different features.
30: 17: 88: 83: 92: 906:
Yes, the researchers typically have to search an area of several square kilometers to see a single individual. Thanks for the support.
551:
The block of stats doesn't read too well either, but I'm not sure how you'd get around that, so this isn't really a helpful comment...
361: 187:
I am nominating this for featured article because we feel this article meets the FA criteria. This article is another product of the
880:
Population data for the species is sparse, but a few studies have shown a low population density of 0.20 to 0.02 individuals per km2.
75: 1076: 1059: 1041: 1026: 1006: 976: 953:
There are still some animals being introduced in too much detail. For example, "The species is a host for the parasitic flatworm,
941: 915: 897: 869: 852: 834: 812: 795: 773: 749: 721: 708: 683: 669: 655: 641: 627: 613: 599: 569: 534: 520: 511: 497: 483: 462: 448: 434: 419: 405: 346: 332: 313: 295: 275: 254: 223: 206: 171: 606:"a "transition towards Cheiroptera, Carnivora, and other inferior Mammalia" from" Per the MoS, links in quotes should be avoided 133: 339:
Shouldn't this technically use Australian spelling? It's not something I'm concerned about, but I can imagine someone may be...
623:
Lorises in general don't jump, as far as I know. I've removed that piece, which seemed to have little specific to the Javan.
754:
Is this still an outstanding issue? Do people want me to add more information about the myths from Java, or is the link to
620:"its unique form of locomotion, which does not involve jumping" Unique to what? This is the only loris which doesn't jump? 138: 755: 731: 726:
Ah... my bad. I was looking at the small versions of the ranges on the IUCN Red List and thought I saw an overlap with
690: 342:
Well, Java isn't in Australia, and I don't think we do spelling according to the closest English-speaking country.
689:
particularly out in the bush. Honestly, if the reader wants to know more, they should follow the "See also:
1034:
by an Indonesian scientist may be pertinent, as their findings are sometimes debated by foreign scientists.
966: 954: 648:"incessant poaching" - "incessant" is inherently a negative term. "Continuous"? Just remove it altogether? 827: 766: 742: 701: 562: 476: 412:"According to Nekaris and Jaffe" Full names would be nice, along with links/clarification of who they are 247: 199: 164: 1072: 1055: 79: 984: 865: 291: 271: 219: 488:
Granted, but I feel the phrase "rescued from the illegal wildlife trade in Java" is overly emotive.
936: 890: 848: 808: 493: 969:
with the class and order? We don't need extraneous information on an unrelated species in a FA.
502:
Maybe we could just swap the verb "rescued" for something more neutral sounding... "obtained"?
821: 760: 736: 695: 676:
Do we know anything about the magical stuff attributed to it? That's potentially interesting.
556: 470: 241: 193: 158: 1068: 1051: 1038: 1023: 1003: 995: 973: 911: 792: 718: 680: 666: 652: 638: 624: 610: 596: 530: 517: 507: 459: 445: 431: 416: 402: 343: 329: 309: 175: 71: 64: 861: 392: 287: 267: 215: 965:)". Wouldn't it be better to just say the name of the species and then create a stub for 929: 884: 844: 804: 584: 577: 489: 376:
considered part of a different species until recently (or that's the impression I got)
304:
Thanks Nikkimaria, I have fixed the order and removed two unnecessary retrieval dates.
999: 988: 962: 587:
seems an ill-defined topic. We do actually give names to the morphological variants (
53: 397: 286:
Use of retrieval dates seems inconsistent. In what circumstances do you use them?
109: 907: 526: 503: 305: 179: 958: 384:
Does the genus "Bradylemur" still exist? It would be worth a link if so.
325:"its fur, morphology" Would its fur not be an element of its morphology? 444:
I could only find the Bengal linked twice; removed the second link.
39:
Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in
882:. The population density is literally less than one, am I correct? 353:"The Javan slow loris (Nycticebus javanicus), was" lose the comma? 1019: 391:; it's certainly no longer valid. The name was also reused for a 1050:
It looks pretty good so far, but there are still a few issues.
1002:, it seems the Dieng Mountains are a somewhat larger area. 143: 679:
I'm not sure; perhaps Visionholder knows more about it.
239:
last3, etc. If that's wrong, what is the proper way? –
263: 105: 101: 97: 57: 843:. I am happy that the article is ready for FA status. 118:
Featured article candidates/Javan slow loris/archive1
991:, but they may be separate. Could you double check? 401:. People liked to change names around at that time. 878:- Just one question from the conservation section: 713:Two? There's only one, unless you are referring to 1089:The above discussion is preserved as an archive. 717:, which should also be covered in this article. 972:Removed the order and class; it's unnecessary. 43:. No further edits should be made to this page. 1067:after the above fixes and comments by Ucucha. 1095:No further edits should be made to this page. 29:The following is an archived discussion of a 8: 122: 41:Knowledge talk:Featured article candidates 983:I'm pretty sure the more common term for 803:Sorry if this is a little overcritical. 229:Check alphabetization of literature list 125: 115: 860:are unproblematic, captions are fine. 415:Removed that piece; it was redundant. 18:Knowledge:Featured article candidates 7: 595:); not sure where the unclarity is. 321:Nice to see more slow loris here. 362:Category:Animals described in 1812 24: 1000:10.1046/j.1365-3008.1998.d01-24.x 693:" at the start of the section. – 468:non-standard sampling method. – 395:, now considered a synonym of 1: 637:Moved some sentences around. 609:Reworded to avoid the quote. 583:We don't know what they are. 372:The lead implies that it was 756:Conservation of slow lorises 732:Conservation of slow lorises 691:Conservation of slow lorises 387:I believe it's a synonym of 31:featured article nomination 1112: 916:03:13, 26 June 2011 (UTC) 898:02:58, 26 June 2011 (UTC) 870:20:18, 23 June 2011 (UTC) 853:11:42, 28 June 2011 (UTC) 835:21:51, 22 June 2011 (UTC) 813:21:46, 22 June 2011 (UTC) 796:22:24, 22 June 2011 (UTC) 750:23:02, 23 June 2011 (UTC) 722:22:48, 23 June 2011 (UTC) 709:22:44, 23 June 2011 (UTC) 684:22:24, 22 June 2011 (UTC) 670:22:24, 22 June 2011 (UTC) 656:22:24, 22 June 2011 (UTC) 642:22:24, 22 June 2011 (UTC) 628:22:24, 22 June 2011 (UTC) 614:22:24, 22 June 2011 (UTC) 600:22:24, 22 June 2011 (UTC) 576:Are the "forms" actually 570:22:44, 23 June 2011 (UTC) 535:03:35, 26 June 2011 (UTC) 521:03:17, 26 June 2011 (UTC) 512:23:27, 23 June 2011 (UTC) 498:23:13, 23 June 2011 (UTC) 484:22:44, 23 June 2011 (UTC) 463:22:24, 22 June 2011 (UTC) 449:22:24, 22 June 2011 (UTC) 435:22:24, 22 June 2011 (UTC) 420:22:24, 22 June 2011 (UTC) 406:22:24, 22 June 2011 (UTC) 347:22:24, 22 June 2011 (UTC) 333:22:24, 22 June 2011 (UTC) 314:14:33, 22 June 2011 (UTC) 296:12:39, 22 June 2011 (UTC) 276:22:00, 22 June 2011 (UTC) 255:21:25, 22 June 2011 (UTC) 224:12:39, 22 June 2011 (UTC) 207:02:54, 22 June 2011 (UTC) 172:02:54, 22 June 2011 (UTC) 1092:Please do not modify it. 1077:01:20, 7 July 2011 (UTC) 1060:23:56, 6 July 2011 (UTC) 1042:00:34, 7 July 2011 (UTC) 1027:00:34, 7 July 2011 (UTC) 1007:00:34, 7 July 2011 (UTC) 977:00:34, 7 July 2011 (UTC) 942:10:50, 1 July 2011 (UTC) 774:20:11, 4 July 2011 (UTC) 189:WP Mammals Collaboration 36:Please do not modify it. 516:That seems fine to me. 264:Sasata fixed it already 214:- spotchecks not done. 1037:I've added the names. 967:Phaneropsolus oviforme 955:Phaneropsolus oviforme 328:Yes, removed "fur". 56:23:28, 10 July 2011 791:Added the authors. 946:A couple comments: 994:From the maps in 183: 151: 150: 1103: 1094: 939: 932: 895: 887: 830: 824: 769: 763: 745: 739: 704: 698: 565: 559: 479: 473: 250: 244: 202: 196: 167: 161: 156:Nominator(s): – 154: 123: 113: 95: 72:Javan slow loris 65:Javan slow loris 48:The article was 38: 1111: 1110: 1106: 1105: 1104: 1102: 1101: 1100: 1099: 1090: 985:Dieng Mountains 937: 930: 891: 885: 828: 822: 767: 761: 743: 737: 702: 696: 563: 557: 477: 471: 393:subfossil lemur 379:Added a little. 248: 242: 200: 194: 165: 159: 86: 70: 68: 34: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 1109: 1107: 1098: 1097: 1084: 1082: 1081: 1080: 1079: 1048: 1047: 1046: 1045: 1044: 1031: 1030: 1029: 1011: 1010: 1009: 981: 980: 979: 948: 947: 944: 921: 920: 919: 918: 901: 900: 838: 837: 801: 800: 799: 798: 786: 785: 784: 783: 782: 781: 780: 779: 778: 777: 776: 674: 673: 672: 660: 659: 658: 646: 645: 644: 632: 631: 630: 618: 617: 616: 604: 603: 602: 585:Form (zoology) 574: 573: 572: 549: 548: 547: 546: 545: 544: 543: 542: 541: 540: 539: 538: 537: 453: 452: 451: 439: 438: 437: 424: 423: 422: 410: 409: 408: 382: 381: 380: 370: 369: 368: 359: 358: 357: 351: 350: 349: 337: 336: 335: 319: 318: 317: 316: 299: 298: 283: 282: 281: 280: 279: 278: 258: 257: 231: 230: 185: 184: 149: 148: 147: 146: 144:External links 141: 136: 128: 127: 121: 120: 67: 62: 61: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1108: 1096: 1093: 1087: 1086: 1085: 1078: 1074: 1070: 1066: 1063: 1062: 1061: 1057: 1053: 1049: 1043: 1040: 1036: 1035: 1032: 1028: 1025: 1021: 1016: 1015: 1012: 1008: 1005: 1001: 997: 993: 992: 990: 989:Dieng Plateau 986: 982: 978: 975: 971: 970: 968: 964: 963:Plagiorchiida 960: 956: 952: 951: 950: 949: 945: 943: 940: 935: 933: 926: 923: 922: 917: 913: 909: 905: 904: 903: 902: 899: 896: 894: 889: 888: 881: 877: 874: 873: 872: 871: 867: 863: 859: 855: 854: 850: 846: 842: 836: 833: 831: 825: 817: 816: 815: 814: 810: 806: 797: 794: 790: 789: 787: 775: 772: 770: 764: 757: 753: 752: 751: 748: 746: 740: 733: 729: 725: 724: 723: 720: 716: 712: 711: 710: 707: 705: 699: 692: 687: 686: 685: 682: 678: 677: 675: 671: 668: 664: 663: 661: 657: 654: 650: 649: 647: 643: 640: 636: 635: 633: 629: 626: 622: 621: 619: 615: 612: 608: 607: 605: 601: 598: 594: 590: 586: 582: 581: 579: 575: 571: 568: 566: 560: 553: 552: 550: 536: 532: 528: 524: 523: 522: 519: 515: 514: 513: 509: 505: 501: 500: 499: 495: 491: 487: 486: 485: 482: 480: 474: 466: 465: 464: 461: 457: 456: 454: 450: 447: 443: 442: 440: 436: 433: 428: 427: 425: 421: 418: 414: 413: 411: 407: 404: 400: 399: 394: 390: 386: 385: 383: 378: 377: 375: 371: 366: 365: 363: 360: 355: 354: 352: 348: 345: 341: 340: 338: 334: 331: 327: 326: 324: 323: 322: 315: 311: 307: 303: 302: 301: 300: 297: 293: 289: 285: 284: 277: 273: 269: 265: 262: 261: 260: 259: 256: 253: 251: 245: 235: 234: 233: 232: 228: 227: 226: 225: 221: 217: 213: 212:Source review 209: 208: 205: 203: 197: 190: 182: 181: 177: 173: 170: 168: 162: 153: 152: 145: 142: 140: 137: 135: 132: 131: 130: 129: 124: 119: 116: 114: 111: 107: 103: 99: 94: 90: 85: 81: 77: 73: 66: 63: 60: 58: 55: 51: 44: 42: 37: 32: 27: 26: 19: 1091: 1088: 1083: 1064: 928: 924: 892: 883: 879: 875: 857: 856: 840: 839: 823:VisionHolder 820: 802: 762:VisionHolder 759: 738:VisionHolder 735: 727: 714: 697:VisionHolder 694: 592: 588: 558:VisionHolder 555: 472:VisionHolder 469: 398:Archaeolemur 396: 388: 373: 320: 243:VisionHolder 240: 238:last2 -: --> 211: 210: 195:VisionHolder 192: 186: 160:VisionHolder 157: 155: 139:Citation bot 69: 49: 47: 35: 28: 1069:Crisco 1492 1052:Crisco 1492 938:talk to me? 237:year -: --> 862:Nikkimaria 758:enough? – 728:N. coucang 665:Reworded. 389:Nycticebus 288:Nikkimaria 268:Nikkimaria 216:Nikkimaria 959:Trematoda 931:Jimfbleak 845:J Milburn 805:J Milburn 651:Removed. 589:javanicus 490:J Milburn 961:, order 134:Analysis 54:Karanacs 50:promoted 1065:Support 957:(class 925:Support 876:Support 841:Support 715:ornatus 593:ornatus 126:Toolbox 89:protect 84:history 1039:Ucucha 1024:Ucucha 1004:Ucucha 974:Ucucha 908:Sasata 858:Images 793:Ucucha 719:Ucucha 681:Ucucha 667:Ucucha 653:Ucucha 639:Ucucha 625:Ucucha 611:Ucucha 597:Ucucha 527:Sasata 525:Done. 518:Ucucha 504:Sasata 460:Ucucha 446:Ucucha 432:Ucucha 417:Ucucha 403:Ucucha 374:always 344:Ucucha 330:Ucucha 306:Sasata 180:Sasata 176:Ucucha 93:delete 1020:taxon 886:ceran 829:talk 768:talk 744:talk 703:talk 578:forms 564:talk 478:talk 249:talk 201:talk 166:talk 110:views 102:watch 98:links 16:< 1073:talk 1056:talk 912:talk 893:thor 866:talk 849:talk 809:talk 734:. – 591:and 531:talk 508:talk 494:talk 367:Yes. 356:Yes. 310:talk 292:talk 272:talk 220:talk 191:. – 106:logs 80:talk 76:edit 996:doi 987:is 52:by 1075:) 1058:) 1022:. 934:- 914:) 868:) 851:) 819:– 811:) 533:) 510:) 496:) 364:? 312:) 294:) 274:) 266:. 222:) 178:, 174:, 108:| 104:| 100:| 96:| 91:| 87:| 82:| 78:| 59:. 33:. 1071:( 1054:( 998:: 910:( 864:( 847:( 832:» 826:« 807:( 771:» 765:« 747:» 741:« 706:» 700:« 567:» 561:« 529:( 506:( 492:( 481:» 475:« 308:( 290:( 270:( 252:» 246:« 218:( 204:» 198:« 169:» 163:« 112:) 74:(

Index

Knowledge:Featured article candidates
featured article nomination
Knowledge talk:Featured article candidates
Karanacs

Javan slow loris
Javan slow loris
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
Featured article candidates/Javan slow loris/archive1
Analysis
Citation bot
External links
VisionHolder
 talk 
02:54, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
Ucucha
Sasata
WP Mammals Collaboration
VisionHolder
 talk 
02:54, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
Nikkimaria

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.