382:"Oryzomys peninsulae is part of the genus Oryzomys" Seems redundant to mention this, as it's something the reader would already know if they read the article up to this point. Also, Oryzomys was linked in the last paragraph.
117:
273:
The
International Code of Zoological Nomenclature mandates that specific names first published with a ligature such as æ are to be corrected (International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature, 1999, Art.
172:
with a very restricted distribution. It's probably not around any more, but even that is uncertain. Sasata GA reviewed it some time ago. I am looking forward to any reviews.
271:
No problem with the text, but i don't like the use of references within footnotes, especially the weird-looking redlinked one. So for example I'd have footnote 1 as
40:
88:
83:
92:
30:
17:
300:
I converted the references to parentheticals. I don't know what the problem is with red links in footnotes, but the link is no longer red.
75:
439:
413:
375:
356:
331:
304:
294:
257:
244:
216:
194:
176:
160:
133:
280:
I don't know if your version accords with MoS, but it's very clunky. FWIW, I wouldn't red-link anything in footnotes or refs.
138:
366:- I'm satisfied that the article meets FAC criteria, especially after the recent tweaking flurry! (I was the GA reviewer)
202:
Two US PD-old, one PD-USFED ( Itweaked the description), one self-made derivative of a
Commons licensed image, no issues
79:
278:
Incorrect subsequent spelling (Alvarez-Castañeda, 1994, p. 99; Carleton and Arroyo-Cabrales, 2009, p. 122)
240:
190:
429:
326:
289:
211:
71:
64:
424:
I have read this and find it meets the FA criteria fully, as well as being an nteresting read,
236:
53:
410:
398:
371:
352:
301:
254:
173:
157:
186:
425:
319:
282:
204:
109:
367:
348:
250:
The article linked to doesn't exist yet, but the topic is worthy of an article.
393:
Linked classification. I think we (or at least, someone else and I) discussed
169:
317:
Fine, great solution to a red link {: No other issues, so change to support
406:
the Musser (2005) reference has a mixture of capitalization in the title
409:
Fully title cased now. Thanks for the review and the copyediting fixes.
39:
Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in
401:
won't do) and this usage of "section" seems peculiar to the genus.
347:- I think the article is highly polished. A few minor things:
143:
118:
Featured article candidates/Oryzomys peninsulae/archive1
105:
101:
97:
57:
397:
sections before; there is really nothing to link to (
449:The above discussion is preserved as an archive.
43:. No further edits should be made to this page.
455:No further edits should be made to this page.
235:Otherwise all sources and citations look OK.
29:The following is an archived discussion of a
8:
122:
41:Knowledge talk:Featured article candidates
231:Publisher location missing for Hall 1981
185:- no dab links or dead external links.
125:
115:
18:Knowledge:Featured article candidates
7:
24:
228:Why the redlinking in footnote 2?
1:
390:link section, classification
440:21:05, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
414:00:44, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
376:04:41, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
357:00:10, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
332:05:58, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
305:14:13, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
295:11:42, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
258:20:47, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
245:15:50, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
217:10:06, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
195:04:07, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
177:03:00, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
161:03:00, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
31:featured article nomination
472:
452:Please do not modify it.
36:Please do not modify it.
168:This is a little-known
56:23:33, 23 October 2010
72:Oryzomys peninsulae
65:Oryzomys peninsulae
276:and footnote 2 as
436:
164:
151:
150:
463:
454:
434:
399:section (botany)
329:
322:
292:
285:
223:Sources comments
214:
207:
154:
123:
113:
95:
48:The article was
38:
471:
470:
466:
465:
464:
462:
461:
460:
459:
450:
433:
327:
320:
290:
283:
212:
205:
86:
70:
68:
34:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
469:
467:
458:
457:
444:
430:
419:
418:
417:
416:
404:
403:
402:
388:
387:
386:
379:
378:
360:
359:
339:
338:
337:
336:
335:
334:
310:
309:
308:
307:
261:
260:
251:
233:
232:
229:
220:
219:
197:
166:
165:
156:Nominator(s):
149:
148:
147:
146:
144:External links
141:
136:
128:
127:
121:
120:
67:
62:
61:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
468:
456:
453:
447:
446:
445:
442:
441:
438:
437:
427:
423:
415:
412:
408:
407:
405:
400:
396:
392:
391:
389:
384:
383:
381:
380:
377:
373:
369:
365:
362:
361:
358:
354:
350:
346:
345:
341:
340:
333:
330:
325:
323:
316:
315:
314:
313:
312:
311:
306:
303:
299:
298:
297:
296:
293:
288:
286:
279:
275:
269:
268:
263:
262:
259:
256:
252:
249:
248:
247:
246:
242:
238:
230:
227:
226:
225:
224:
218:
215:
210:
208:
201:
198:
196:
192:
188:
184:
181:
180:
179:
178:
175:
171:
163:
162:
159:
153:
152:
145:
142:
140:
137:
135:
132:
131:
130:
129:
124:
119:
116:
114:
111:
107:
103:
99:
94:
90:
85:
81:
77:
73:
66:
63:
60:
58:
55:
51:
44:
42:
37:
32:
27:
26:
19:
451:
448:
443:
428:
421:
420:
394:
363:
343:
342:
318:
281:
277:
272:
270:
266:
264:
237:Brianboulton
234:
222:
221:
203:
200:Image Review
199:
182:
167:
155:
139:Citation bot
69:
54:SandyGeorgia
49:
47:
35:
28:
328:talk to me?
291:talk to me?
213:talk to me?
187:Nikkimaria
432:<: -->
426:Ruhrfisch
321:Jimfbleak
284:Jimfbleak
206:Jimfbleak
395:Oryzomys
385:Removed.
344:Comments
265:Support
170:rice rat
134:Analysis
50:promoted
422:Support
364:Support
274:32.5.2)
267:Comment
253:Added.
183:Comment
126:Toolbox
89:protect
84:history
411:Ucucha
368:Sasata
349:Sasata
302:Ucucha
255:Ucucha
174:Ucucha
158:Ucucha
93:delete
431:: -->
110:views
102:watch
98:links
16:<
372:talk
353:talk
241:talk
191:talk
106:logs
80:talk
76:edit
52:by
374:)
355:)
324:-
287:-
243:)
209:-
193:)
108:|
104:|
100:|
96:|
91:|
87:|
82:|
78:|
59:.
33:.
435:°
370:(
351:(
239:(
189:(
112:)
74:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.