Knowledge (XXG)

:Featured article candidates/Lieutenant Governor of New Jersey/archive1 - Knowledge (XXG)

Source πŸ“

476:
scandal details here. To your main point: McGreevey was accused of sexual improprieties and harassment by Golan Cipel, and the media criticized that the governor appointed a love interest into a "homeland security" post that he wasn't qualified for except for having been the governor's love interest, other damaging sexual allegations came to light, it wasn't just his admission of being a "gay American". Simply put, he resigned amid a sex scandal. I'd prefer not to dance around the obvious with euphemisms or sugarcoating--and I'd use the phrase "sex scandal" whether the participants were gay or straight and the circumstances warranted it. Here, this incident had all the hallmarks of a scandal and it was compared by the media with other scandals (especially after Spitzer resigned). Newspaper coverage described it as a scandal, and even McGreevey discusses the nature of the events (and others) as a "scandal" in his memoir (his former wife in her memoir uses the word "scandal" more frequently, but she might have had reason to be bitter.) Nevertheless, the details are found elsewhere and at length discussion of them wouldn't be germane here.--
226:"It is the second highest-ranking official in the state government. The lieutenant governor is elected on a ticket with the governor for a four-year term." - I feel like these two could be merged, and at the same time clarify who is the highest ranking. It sounds obvious, but not everyone on Knowledge (XXG) has a western style of governance. Something like "it is the second highest-ranking official in the state government, behind the governor, with whom the lieutenant governor is elected for a four-year term." Just throwing it out there for a jazzy sentence. Or, if that's too jazzy, merge these - "The lieutenant governor is elected on a ticket with the governor for a four-year term. The lieutenant governor's term is concurrent to the governor's four-year term. " 1115:--even asked a friend at the National Portrait Gallery if they knew of one. We could not find one. We had previously used Guadagno's official state portrait on the article. NJ's official website states that state government images could be used freely and without obligation--and commons used to have a PD-NJ tag, but since there was no explicit permission on the NJ website to alter (even though it was considered implied), that tag was deleted and so with all the images/files it supported. I emailed the Christie-Guadagno campaign in October/November organization for one, they never replied. If a better image does come up for Guadagno or one is uncovered for Ingoldesby, as long as I'm alive, I'll find a way to get it up.-- 1491:
approve. But there are a few seeming inconsistencies: the top of the "Gubernatorial succession" section refers to "the governor of New Jersey"; the "Resignations and succession controversies" section refers to "a permanent solution such as a Lieutenant Governor" and "establishing a Lieutenant Governor"; the "Referendum on a constitutional amendment" section refers to "acting governor Richard Codey" and "Incumbent governor Jon Corzine"; and there is a section called "List of Lieutenant Governors" (capitalized) with table headings "Lieutenant Governor" and "Royal Governor". I'm not 100% sure when Lieutenant and Governor should be capitalized, but I'm sure the article should be consistent.
1501:- In the GA review I tried to get it consistent, but concede there were probably a few strays. I erred on keeping the column labels capitalized for the table. I couldn't find anything MOS wise regarding it in a quick check, but they are titles as a proper noun in this context, and aesthetically I didn't care for the alternative version in lowercase, I kept them capitalized. I rephrased the "Incumbent governor" sentence. "Acting Governor" done., and addressed the others above. I think that should make the usage generally consistent. shout if you see any additional strays.-- 359:
take up too much space to explain and end up worthy of its own article (not a bad idea). So is this a question of what I think is a rather clear sentence not getting the point across (which you could tell me how it doesn't) or just a matter of you thinking you'd write it differently (which is unactionable, IMHO)? We often forget that an article is a summary (
548:"On November 3, 2009, Christie defeated Corzine by a margin of 48.5% (1,174,445 votes) to 44.9% (1,087,731 votes), with 5.8% (139,579 votes) of the vote going to independent candidate Chris Daggett." - is there a reason you spell out Chris Daggett's name here, when you just refer to Christie and Corzine by their last names? 358:
How is the sentence "not clear"? If you could tell me something more than "not exactly sure" I'd consider addressing it, but just saying "it could be clearer" doesn't really tell me much. Further, that's about as clear a synopsis as can be managed. If I go into an explanation of the dispute, it would
237:
governor and adding a clause is not necessary. Further, one of the comments in the GA review was that the lede was too large, so adding more explanatory material to the lede isn't a course I would take lightly--especially when the rest of the article establishes those points at length sufficiently.--
1659:
Consider "This order of succession would be included in the first state constitution in 1776, and the subsequent 1844 constitution, and kept in the 1947 Constitution until the 2006 amendment." The simple past tense is more appropriate, and the commas are problematic. Might I recommend the following?
236:
These sentences were originally one longer, combined sentence and were copyedited into three sentences for greater clarity. I am averse to merging these sentences because of that. I think the three sentences together are sufficient to establish the subordinate role of the lieutenant governor to the
1595:
Well, yes... I can only think of suboptimal wordings. Adding "in the state" would create an awkward duplication of "state", and adding "in New Jersey" would create a different awkward duplication. But leaving it as is could give the false impression that it was the only such office in the country,
475:
Again, we're advised not to go into too much detail especially on tangents--especially when that detail is discussed at other articles there's no need to regurgitate it. I will link it to the relevant section at the McGreevey article, but since it's unnecessary detail I'll avoid regurgitating the
170:
This article is about a political office in the state of New Jersey that was created in 2005 and filled for the first time in the modern era in 2009. It discusses the quirks of the state's early history that caused New Jersey to be one of the few American states without a lieutenant governor, the
1537:
Related: I think "President of the New Jersey State Senate" is appropriately capitalized as the name of the position, but I don't think "state senate" should be capitalized in "his or her powerful role in the State Senate", nor do I think the capital letters are warranted in "filled by the State
1490:
You usually capitalize "Lieutenant Governor" and "Governor" when it precedes a name (e.g. "Governor Thomas Kean") or when part of the full title ("Lieutenant Governor of New Jersey"), but not in any other cases (e.g. "grants the governor the power", "did not have a lieutenant governor", etc.). I
1233:
When the text says "Ingoldesby became acting governor of both provinces briefly", the rest of the paragraph describes specifically when his term began and ended, including the different dates for the end. I don't think it clarifies anything to say "(1709–1710)", and in some ways in confuses the
464:
As an LGBT New Jerseyan, I think it's kinda unfair to brush off McGreevey's resigning as "a sex scandal". 2004 was a very different time than 2013 as far as gay Americans go. I'm not saying much more is needed, but I think a bit more might be in order here. Him resigning is quite different from
412:
in its messiness, and since there's no use using commas if one isn't needed, I don't know what else you're getting at. I revised it to: "Ingoldesby furthered angered the colony's Quaker leaders after he retaliated against them for their opposition to raising troops from New Jersey to support a
626:
It would be interesting to see what constitutional crisis emerges if Christie does move on in 2016. The state's constitution doesn't provide a Lt. Gov. who assumes the acting governorship to appoint or fill a vacant Lt. Governorship, which places a Republican governor at a disadvantage with a
445:
No, it is not backed up by fn.24--the following sentence is, where the footnote appears. The sentence you complain of is the first sentence (thesis) of the section. The rest of the section adequately backs up its thesis with sourced information. Not every sentence need to be tagged with a
219: 279:
I think merging the sentences will reduce clarity (as it apparently did in earlier versions where these three sentences were united) and create a nasty confusing run-on (something you point to as needing clarification in another example below). So we're just going to have to agree to
321:
Because a few months ago someone else thought that something similar to that wasn't clear enough, and I'm loathe to get into a tug-of-war over it if it's just a matter of "I would have written this differently" because everyone would write something differently. But I'll defer.
997:"The person elected to this position is the second highest-ranking official in the state government. The lieutenant governor is elected concurrently on a ticket with the governor for a four-year term." These two can be merged, since (I think) they refer to the same person. 1268:- The usage of 1681/2 conforms with Annunciation Style--which was in use in Britain and her colonies before 1752 when they used the Julian Calendar when Europe had been using the Gregorian for 170 years previous. WP:OSNS requires an explanatory footnote--added. -- 1780:
This is just my opinion, but it seems to me that "in accordance with Article IX, paragraph 1 of the state constitution" gives unnecessary detail about how New Jersey's constitution is amended. What would you think of simply saying "in accordance with the state
1566:
The article says "Prior to creation of the lieutenant governor position, the governor of New Jersey was the only state-wide, non-federal, elected office." In New Jersey, you mean. I think adding "in the state" would maximize precision while minimizing
1596:
especially since the very next sentence compares New Jersey to other states. Perhaps a major rewording of the whole paragraph could fix the problem, but I can't think of a way. You may be forced to pick the best of the available not-so-great options.
348:"He furthered angered the colony's Quaker leaders by retaliating against them for refusing to support raising troops for a military effort to invade French colonies in Canada" - I'm not exactly sure what happened here, but I think it could be clearer. 107: 627:
Democratic legislature--so that raises an interesting question of succession and political wrangling. The article is on my watchlist and I'll be sure to update it if I'm around in 2016/2017. If I don't, someone else will--I'm sure of that.--
114: 255:
Well, I just think that those two sentences started with "The lieutenant governor" and end with "governor for a four-year term" and "governor's four-year term". Seems like those two could be combined easily without losing anything. --β™«
1691:
says "Captions should be succinct". I think the clause "a former funeral director from Orange, New Jersey" is not relevant to the article and should be omitted. (Readers can always click on the link to learn more about him if they're
1151:"During the proprietary period (1664–1702), the colony was often administered"... But it was two colonies, not a single colony. You should explain that it was divided, move the mention of East and West Jersey up, and 1951:
I think I've addressed your suggestions and comments. Please let me know if there are any additional concerns. Thank you for your meticulous attention in reviewing this article and for your (anticipated) support.
920:"The governor and lieutenant governor must be members of the same political party, campaign on the same ticket, are elected conjointly, and serve the same four-year term concurrently." - "be elected conjointly"? 1205:
When text says "In its previous creation...", it sounds like you mean previous to the merging of the crown colony. Also, it would be simpler and clearer to use a comma instead of an em-dash in that sentence.
1724:, when a date is formatted like "January 8, 2002", the year is acting as a parenthetic, and needs a comma after it (unless it's at the end of a sentence). There's only one such problem in this article. 1809:
This isn't strictly necessary, but since you already have a "notes" section, I think the additional information about members not voting or abstaining would be better as footnotes. What do you think?
1098:
It's surprising to me that there are no portraits of Richard Ingoldesby. I suspect that one exists, but we have yet to find it. Similarly, the photo of Kim Guadagno is not very good, but none of
516:
Is it worth mentioning that Codey and DiFrancesco were considered official governors retroactively, or is that trivial? Really not suggesting anything here, it was something that came to mind.
1660:"This order of succession was included in the first state constitution in 1776, reinstated in the subsequent 1844 constitution, and kept in the 1947 Constitution until the 2006 amendment." 90: 298:"What's wrong with "The lieutenant governor is elected concurrently on a ticket with the governor for a four-year term."? It removes an entire sentence and is still quite clear. --β™« 435:
Just being picky, but "New Jersey had two recent periods during which several politicians assumed the governorship within the span of a few years.' - this isn't backed up by ref 24.
1340:
I don't know what this means: "Pownall did not assume the governorship of New Jersey as his expertise shared in England led to his commission as Royal Governor of Massachusetts".
86: 1619:. The next sentence starts with "New Jersey" but because it avoids the tautology I can accept that under the "best available" option. Let me know if you think that's o.k. -- 78: 446:
source...especially if it's just an introductory sentence and the rest of the section it prefaces adequately is sourced (as this one is with about two dozen footnotes).--
1935:
This is a fascinating article. I have not done a thorough source check, but the sources look great at a quick perusal. The quotes are relevant and helpful. In my
1454:"Prior to creation of the lieutenant governor position" seems ambiguous, because you're referring to a period after there already been two of them. Prior to the 526:
good point, I'll consider a way to incorporate that weighing whether it's appropriate vis-Γ -vis that being covered at the Codey and DiFrancesco articles, or at
408:
Unlike most run-ons, this one is rather straightforward and no longer than average sentence in an average academic history text--so I unless there's something
40: 808:"The President ... would assume the role of acting governor while retaining their powerful role in the State Senate." - This is a misuse of the word "their". 130: 367:). If anyone wants more detail on the dispute, they can read the source that supports the statement which spends a few dozen pages setting up the action. -- 2021: 1981: 1961: 1946: 1926: 1911: 1888: 1860: 1828: 1800: 1771: 1743: 1711: 1679: 1644: 1628: 1603: 1586: 1557: 1526: 1510: 1481: 1445: 1405: 1375: 1359: 1331: 1301: 1277: 1253: 1224: 1194: 1174: 1140: 1124: 1087: 1072: 1048: 1016: 978: 956: 939: 911: 883: 855: 827: 799: 771: 743: 711: 683: 658: 636: 618: 595: 567: 539: 505: 485: 455: 422: 396: 376: 331: 309: 289: 267: 246: 205: 183: 162: 56: 604: 1102:
is any better. That should be a challenge to New Jersey Wikipedians: get a decent photo of this person! But none of this is necessary for this FAC.
1112: 1991: 1939:, I always found the article's statements fully supported by the sources without plagiarism. Once my nitpicks are dealt with, I expect to support. 30: 17: 1611: 892:"... the date that the vote count of that election were confirmed as final and certified by the state's Secretary of State." - "was confirmed"? 82: 1068: 1025:
In the "2009 gubernatorial election" section, you refer to both "running-mate" and "running mate" - be consistent. (Since the article is at
664:"It is the second highest-ranking official in the state government." - It doesn't seem correct to me to refer to an official person as "it". 2002: 135: 1917:
Looking forward to your further anticipated remarks. Thank you for your keen attention to this article and for jumping in to review.--
174:
After a very comprehensive GA assessment that was more intense than most FACs, I think this article is ready for FA consideration.--
73: 66: 947:-- Many thanks for your comments, I think I've adequately addressed your concerns. Do you see any additional issues to be fixed? -- 527: 171:
circumstances that forced New Jersey to create the post, and the qualifications and powers of the office in its current form.
1419: 1415: 780:"... it empowers the governor to appoint "principal department heads" that serve as his (or her) pleasure." - Nor does this. 1386:
It seems odd to refer to Montgomerie, Cosby, etc., by their last names only, when they have not been previously introduced.
1752:
I don't like the wording "a fluke of political circumstance". In an electoral fluke? In an unusual political circumstance?
1436:- went with the first option. Since the East and West Jersey proprietary colonies were before its incarnation as "PofNJ"-- 603:
All in all, it's a really good article on a fairly new subject. Hope it keeps up to date when there is a change in 2017 (
993:
its promotion. Just a few concerns. (I'm not in the know about American politics, so feel free to laugh at these...)
607:- it'd be funny to see the very first lieutenant governor actually become governor due to another resignation). --β™« 1312:
I suspect "1st Duke of Newcastle" is a parenthetic, requiring a comma after it when it doesn't end a sentence.
836:"The legislation proposed before the general assembly was titled ..." - This sentence seems awkwardly phrased. 1099: 1869:
Consider splitting citation 1 into a note (for the explanatory information) and a citation (for the source).
613: 500: 391: 304: 262: 1957: 1922: 1884: 1856: 1838: 1824: 1796: 1767: 1739: 1707: 1675: 1624: 1615: 1582: 1553: 1506: 1477: 1441: 1423: 1401: 1355: 1327: 1273: 1249: 1220: 1170: 1120: 1083: 1044: 1012: 952: 935: 907: 879: 851: 823: 795: 767: 739: 707: 679: 632: 591: 563: 535: 481: 451: 418: 372: 327: 285: 242: 179: 158: 576:"The current lieutenant governor, Kim Guadagno, serves as New Jersey's 33rd Secretary of State." - ref? 649:
My knowledge of US politics is approximately nil. Here are a few comments on the text of the article:
1059: 974: 654: 201: 360: 1472:- I went with "modern" in leaving open the odd-chance that the post gets scrapped in a few years.-- 1995: 364: 2017: 864:"After the primary election in June 2009, Governor Corzine sign into law A.3902, ..." - "signed"? 608: 495: 386: 299: 257: 752:"-an offer retracted by his demands for wide-ranging powers-" - This doesn't sound quite right. 1953: 1918: 1880: 1852: 1820: 1792: 1763: 1735: 1703: 1671: 1620: 1578: 1549: 1502: 1473: 1437: 1397: 1351: 1323: 1269: 1245: 1216: 1166: 1116: 1079: 1040: 1008: 948: 931: 903: 875: 847: 819: 791: 763: 735: 703: 675: 628: 587: 559: 531: 477: 447: 414: 368: 323: 281: 238: 175: 154: 1577:
Would it not be a jarring tautology to say "only state-wide...elected office in the state"?--
385:
It's just a bit of a run-on. Could you add a comma? The sentence structure is messy IMO. --β™«
720:"Ingoldesby furthered angered the colony's Quaker leaders after he retaliated ..." - Typo. 692:" Ingoldesby first served under the colony's first royal governor ..." - too many "first"s. 970: 944: 650: 197: 1994:
has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see
2013: 1111:- I was surprised as well that there was no Ingoldesby portrait when I was preparing 53: 1977: 1942: 1907: 1640: 1610:
Prior to modern creation of the lieutenant governor position, the only state-wide,
1599: 1522: 1371: 1297: 1190: 1136: 1026: 1183:
Great, but that turned it into quite a long sentence, which I took the liberty of
413:
planned invasion of French colonies in Canada." I am hopeful that this suffices.--
218:, looks good! As a New Jerseyan and a political lover, I had to stumble here from 2009: 1688: 1155:
say accurately that the colonies were often administered in such-and-such a way.
1721: 1837:
I don't think "Governor" (in the second table heading) needs to link to
1078:
Many thanks for your comments and suggestions, and for your support. --
530:, etc., and reviewing some sources. Standby--might take a day or so.-- 108:
Featured article candidates/Lieutenant Governor of New Jersey/archive1
930:- split into two sentences. In the new arrangement, "are" was kept.-- 39:
Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in
1974:. This article passes all our FA criteria, and should be featured. 115:
Featured article review/Lieutenant Governor of New Jersey/archive1
1039:- rendered consistently as "running mate" for all 9 mentions.-- 989:
This looks really good and I think it meets the FA criteria. I
969:
this candidacy on the grounds of prose and comprehensiveness.
1215:- revised the passage (per this and the above suggestion). -- 1056:
That's really it. Congratulations on a high quality article.
494:
I suppose it's fine adding the link. Better than before. --β™«
465:
Whitman leaving after being appointed to another position.
140: 1262:
I don't think "(1681/2–1757)" is a correct date format.
674:- revised to "The person elected to this position is" -- 1184: 98: 94: 59: 1294:
what you meant! Okay, that footnote is quite useful.
1904:
I will continue this review over the next few days.
1608:I think, I may have solved it by rephrasing it as 2029:The above discussion is preserved as an archive. 1420:Colonial_history_of_New_Jersey#Proprietary_Colony 363:) where we're advised to avoid excessive detail ( 41:Knowledge (XXG) talk:Featured article candidates 1900:: there are no problems with any of the images. 43:. No further edits should be made to this page. 1029:, that's what I would use, but it's up to you) 2035:No further edits should be made to this page. 2008:template in place on the talk page until the 29:The following is an archived discussion of a 8: 558:revised to "of the vote going to Daggett".-- 965:Your changes address my concerns and I now 18:Knowledge (XXG):Featured article candidates 119: 1368:Excellent rewording. (I added a comma.) 1113:List of colonial governors of New Jersey 1637:Yes, great choice, I think that works. 1458:creation? Prior to the creation of the 122: 112: 105: 7: 1350:- Revised the passage to clarify.-- 1007:- merged and revised accordingly.-- 24: 1414:You link "proprietary period" to 74:Lieutenant Governor of New Jersey 67:Lieutenant Governor of New Jersey 1519:Great, it looks fine to me now. 1418:. Would it be better to link to 528:List of Governors of New Jersey 1416:Colonial history of New Jersey 702:- removed the first "first" -- 1: 2022:05:31, 27 December 2013 (UTC) 1982:21:23, 24 December 2013 (UTC) 1962:20:52, 24 December 2013 (UTC) 1947:19:26, 24 December 2013 (UTC) 1927:21:36, 23 December 2013 (UTC) 1912:20:36, 23 December 2013 (UTC) 1889:20:52, 24 December 2013 (UTC) 1861:20:52, 24 December 2013 (UTC) 1829:20:52, 24 December 2013 (UTC) 1801:20:52, 24 December 2013 (UTC) 1772:20:52, 24 December 2013 (UTC) 1744:20:52, 24 December 2013 (UTC) 1712:20:52, 24 December 2013 (UTC) 1680:20:53, 24 December 2013 (UTC) 1645:04:11, 25 December 2013 (UTC) 1629:22:19, 24 December 2013 (UTC) 1604:21:23, 24 December 2013 (UTC) 1587:20:40, 24 December 2013 (UTC) 1558:20:34, 24 December 2013 (UTC) 1527:21:23, 24 December 2013 (UTC) 1511:20:34, 24 December 2013 (UTC) 1482:20:10, 24 December 2013 (UTC) 1462:lieutenant governor position? 1446:20:15, 24 December 2013 (UTC) 1406:21:18, 23 December 2013 (UTC) 1376:16:12, 24 December 2013 (UTC) 1360:21:26, 23 December 2013 (UTC) 1332:21:15, 23 December 2013 (UTC) 1302:16:12, 24 December 2013 (UTC) 1278:21:10, 23 December 2013 (UTC) 1254:21:34, 23 December 2013 (UTC) 1225:21:31, 23 December 2013 (UTC) 1195:16:12, 24 December 2013 (UTC) 1175:21:31, 23 December 2013 (UTC) 1141:16:12, 24 December 2013 (UTC) 1125:20:57, 23 December 2013 (UTC) 1088:20:05, 22 December 2013 (UTC) 1073:16:24, 22 December 2013 (UTC) 1049:20:05, 22 December 2013 (UTC) 1017:20:03, 22 December 2013 (UTC) 985:Comments from Taylor Trescott 979:10:53, 10 December 2013 (UTC) 957:06:00, 10 December 2013 (UTC) 828:05:58, 10 December 2013 (UTC) 800:05:58, 10 December 2013 (UTC) 206:14:02, 29 November 2013 (UTC) 196:are fine, captions are good. 184:18:17, 23 November 2013 (UTC) 163:18:17, 23 November 2013 (UTC) 57:10:01, 27 December 2013 (UTC) 940:03:15, 9 December 2013 (UTC) 912:03:15, 9 December 2013 (UTC) 884:03:15, 9 December 2013 (UTC) 856:05:57, 9 December 2013 (UTC) 772:03:27, 9 December 2013 (UTC) 744:03:15, 9 December 2013 (UTC) 712:03:15, 9 December 2013 (UTC) 684:03:15, 9 December 2013 (UTC) 659:18:54, 7 December 2013 (UTC) 637:16:38, 3 December 2013 (UTC) 619:06:35, 3 December 2013 (UTC) 596:07:22, 3 December 2013 (UTC) 568:07:20, 3 December 2013 (UTC) 540:07:01, 3 December 2013 (UTC) 506:15:54, 3 December 2013 (UTC) 486:06:56, 3 December 2013 (UTC) 456:07:01, 3 December 2013 (UTC) 423:16:21, 3 December 2013 (UTC) 397:15:54, 3 December 2013 (UTC) 377:06:56, 3 December 2013 (UTC) 332:16:26, 3 December 2013 (UTC) 310:16:18, 3 December 2013 (UTC) 290:16:15, 3 December 2013 (UTC) 268:15:54, 3 December 2013 (UTC) 247:07:15, 3 December 2013 (UTC) 2003:featured article candidates 211:Comments from Hurricanehink 31:featured article nomination 2052: 1548:I think I got them all. -- 1614:, elected office was the 189:Image check by Nikkimaria 2032:Please do not modify it. 1762:- Went with "unusual" -- 1244:- (1709–1710) removed.-- 645:Comments from Cwmhiraeth 36:Please do not modify it. 1670:with suggested text. -- 1839:Governor of New Jersey 1616:Governor of New Jersey 1424:Province of New Jersey 1094:Comments from Quadell 1791:rephrased sentence-- 1538:Senate President" 1100:the other options 616: 503: 394: 307: 265: 166: 148: 147: 2043: 2034: 2007: 2001: 1998:, and leave the 1980: 1945: 1910: 1643: 1602: 1525: 1374: 1300: 1266:Reply/Addressed: 1193: 1139: 1133:I doubt it not. 1062: 874:- added "-ed" -- 612: 499: 390: 303: 261: 153:Nominator(s): -- 151: 120: 103: 102: 48:The article was 38: 2051: 2050: 2046: 2045: 2044: 2042: 2041: 2040: 2039: 2030: 2005: 1999: 1975: 1940: 1905: 1879:- Good idea. -- 1819:. Good idea. -- 1638: 1597: 1520: 1499:Reply/Addressed 1369: 1295: 1188: 1134: 1096: 1071: 1061:Taylor Trescott 1060: 987: 846:- rephrased. -- 647: 222:and commentΒ :) 213: 191: 76: 72: 70: 34: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 2049: 2047: 2038: 2037: 2025: 2024: 2012:goes through. 1969: 1968: 1967: 1966: 1965: 1964: 1930: 1929: 1902: 1901: 1894: 1893: 1892: 1891: 1871: 1870: 1866: 1865: 1864: 1863: 1843: 1842: 1834: 1833: 1832: 1831: 1811: 1810: 1806: 1805: 1804: 1803: 1783: 1782: 1781:constitution"? 1777: 1776: 1775: 1774: 1754: 1753: 1749: 1748: 1747: 1746: 1726: 1725: 1717: 1716: 1715: 1714: 1694: 1693: 1685: 1684: 1683: 1682: 1662: 1661: 1656: 1655: 1654: 1653: 1652: 1651: 1650: 1649: 1648: 1647: 1632: 1631: 1590: 1589: 1569: 1568: 1563: 1562: 1561: 1560: 1540: 1539: 1534: 1533: 1532: 1531: 1530: 1529: 1514: 1513: 1493: 1492: 1487: 1486: 1485: 1484: 1464: 1463: 1451: 1450: 1449: 1448: 1428: 1427: 1411: 1410: 1409: 1408: 1388: 1387: 1383: 1382: 1381: 1380: 1379: 1378: 1363: 1362: 1342: 1341: 1337: 1336: 1335: 1334: 1314: 1313: 1309: 1308: 1307: 1306: 1305: 1304: 1283: 1282: 1281: 1280: 1259: 1258: 1257: 1256: 1236: 1235: 1230: 1229: 1228: 1227: 1207: 1206: 1202: 1201: 1200: 1199: 1198: 1197: 1178: 1177: 1157: 1156: 1148: 1147: 1146: 1145: 1144: 1143: 1128: 1127: 1095: 1092: 1091: 1090: 1067: 1054: 1053: 1052: 1051: 1031: 1030: 1022: 1021: 1020: 1019: 999: 998: 986: 983: 982: 981: 962: 961: 960: 959: 942: 922: 921: 917: 916: 915: 914: 894: 893: 889: 888: 887: 886: 866: 865: 861: 860: 859: 858: 838: 837: 833: 832: 831: 830: 810: 809: 805: 804: 803: 802: 782: 781: 777: 776: 775: 774: 754: 753: 749: 748: 747: 746: 722: 721: 717: 716: 715: 714: 694: 693: 689: 688: 687: 686: 666: 665: 646: 643: 642: 641: 640: 639: 601: 600: 599: 598: 578: 577: 573: 572: 571: 570: 550: 549: 545: 544: 543: 542: 518: 517: 513: 512: 511: 510: 509: 508: 489: 488: 467: 466: 461: 460: 459: 458: 437: 436: 432: 431: 430: 429: 428: 427: 426: 425: 400: 399: 380: 379: 350: 349: 345: 344: 343: 342: 341: 340: 339: 338: 337: 336: 335: 334: 313: 312: 293: 292: 271: 270: 250: 249: 228: 227: 212: 209: 190: 187: 168: 167: 146: 145: 144: 143: 141:External links 138: 133: 125: 124: 118: 117: 111: 110: 69: 64: 63: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2048: 2036: 2033: 2027: 2026: 2023: 2019: 2015: 2011: 2004: 1997: 1993: 1989: 1986: 1985: 1984: 1983: 1979: 1973: 1963: 1959: 1955: 1950: 1949: 1948: 1944: 1938: 1934: 1933: 1932: 1931: 1928: 1924: 1920: 1916: 1915: 1914: 1913: 1909: 1899: 1896: 1895: 1890: 1886: 1882: 1878: 1875: 1874: 1873: 1872: 1868: 1867: 1862: 1858: 1854: 1850: 1847: 1846: 1845: 1844: 1840: 1836: 1835: 1830: 1826: 1822: 1818: 1815: 1814: 1813: 1812: 1808: 1807: 1802: 1798: 1794: 1790: 1787: 1786: 1785: 1784: 1779: 1778: 1773: 1769: 1765: 1761: 1758: 1757: 1756: 1755: 1751: 1750: 1745: 1741: 1737: 1733: 1730: 1729: 1728: 1727: 1723: 1719: 1718: 1713: 1709: 1705: 1701: 1698: 1697: 1696: 1695: 1690: 1687: 1686: 1681: 1677: 1673: 1669: 1666: 1665: 1664: 1663: 1658: 1657: 1646: 1642: 1636: 1635: 1634: 1633: 1630: 1626: 1622: 1618: 1617: 1613: 1607: 1606: 1605: 1601: 1594: 1593: 1592: 1591: 1588: 1584: 1580: 1576: 1573: 1572: 1571: 1570: 1565: 1564: 1559: 1555: 1551: 1547: 1544: 1543: 1542: 1541: 1536: 1535: 1528: 1524: 1518: 1517: 1516: 1515: 1512: 1508: 1504: 1500: 1497: 1496: 1495: 1494: 1489: 1488: 1483: 1479: 1475: 1471: 1468: 1467: 1466: 1465: 1461: 1457: 1453: 1452: 1447: 1443: 1439: 1435: 1432: 1431: 1430: 1429: 1425: 1422:, or perhaps 1421: 1417: 1413: 1412: 1407: 1403: 1399: 1395: 1392: 1391: 1390: 1389: 1385: 1384: 1377: 1373: 1367: 1366: 1365: 1364: 1361: 1357: 1353: 1349: 1346: 1345: 1344: 1343: 1339: 1338: 1333: 1329: 1325: 1321: 1318: 1317: 1316: 1315: 1311: 1310: 1303: 1299: 1293: 1289: 1288: 1287: 1286: 1285: 1284: 1279: 1275: 1271: 1267: 1264: 1263: 1261: 1260: 1255: 1251: 1247: 1243: 1240: 1239: 1238: 1237: 1232: 1231: 1226: 1222: 1218: 1214: 1211: 1210: 1209: 1208: 1204: 1203: 1196: 1192: 1186: 1182: 1181: 1180: 1179: 1176: 1172: 1168: 1165:- revised. -- 1164: 1161: 1160: 1159: 1158: 1154: 1150: 1149: 1142: 1138: 1132: 1131: 1130: 1129: 1126: 1122: 1118: 1114: 1110: 1107: 1106: 1105: 1104: 1103: 1101: 1093: 1089: 1085: 1081: 1077: 1076: 1075: 1074: 1070: 1065: 1064: 1063: 1050: 1046: 1042: 1038: 1035: 1034: 1033: 1032: 1028: 1024: 1023: 1018: 1014: 1010: 1006: 1003: 1002: 1001: 1000: 996: 995: 994: 992: 984: 980: 976: 972: 968: 964: 963: 958: 954: 950: 946: 943: 941: 937: 933: 929: 926: 925: 924: 923: 919: 918: 913: 909: 905: 902:- to "was" -- 901: 898: 897: 896: 895: 891: 890: 885: 881: 877: 873: 870: 869: 868: 867: 863: 862: 857: 853: 849: 845: 842: 841: 840: 839: 835: 834: 829: 825: 821: 817: 814: 813: 812: 811: 807: 806: 801: 797: 793: 789: 786: 785: 784: 783: 779: 778: 773: 769: 765: 762:- revised. -- 761: 758: 757: 756: 755: 751: 750: 745: 741: 737: 733: 729: 726: 725: 724: 723: 719: 718: 713: 709: 705: 701: 698: 697: 696: 695: 691: 690: 685: 681: 677: 673: 670: 669: 668: 667: 663: 662: 661: 660: 656: 652: 644: 638: 634: 630: 625: 624: 623: 622: 621: 620: 615: 610: 609:Hurricanehink 606: 597: 593: 589: 585: 582: 581: 580: 579: 575: 574: 569: 565: 561: 557: 554: 553: 552: 551: 547: 546: 541: 537: 533: 529: 525: 522: 521: 520: 519: 515: 514: 507: 502: 497: 496:Hurricanehink 493: 492: 491: 490: 487: 483: 479: 474: 471: 470: 469: 468: 463: 462: 457: 453: 449: 444: 441: 440: 439: 438: 434: 433: 424: 420: 416: 411: 407: 404: 403: 402: 401: 398: 393: 388: 387:Hurricanehink 384: 383: 382: 381: 378: 374: 370: 366: 362: 357: 354: 353: 352: 351: 347: 346: 333: 329: 325: 320: 317: 316: 315: 314: 311: 306: 301: 300:Hurricanehink 297: 296: 295: 294: 291: 287: 283: 278: 275: 274: 273: 272: 269: 264: 259: 258:Hurricanehink 254: 253: 252: 251: 248: 244: 240: 235: 232: 231: 230: 229: 225: 224: 223: 221: 217: 210: 208: 207: 203: 199: 195: 188: 186: 185: 181: 177: 172: 165: 164: 160: 156: 150: 149: 142: 139: 137: 134: 132: 129: 128: 127: 126: 121: 116: 113: 109: 106: 104: 100: 96: 92: 88: 84: 80: 75: 68: 65: 62: 60: 58: 55: 51: 44: 42: 37: 32: 27: 26: 19: 2031: 2028: 1988:Closing note 1987: 1971: 1970: 1954:ColonelHenry 1936: 1919:ColonelHenry 1903: 1898:Image review 1897: 1881:ColonelHenry 1876: 1853:ColonelHenry 1848: 1821:ColonelHenry 1816: 1793:ColonelHenry 1788: 1764:ColonelHenry 1759: 1736:ColonelHenry 1731: 1704:ColonelHenry 1699: 1672:ColonelHenry 1667: 1621:ColonelHenry 1609: 1579:ColonelHenry 1574: 1550:ColonelHenry 1545: 1503:ColonelHenry 1498: 1474:ColonelHenry 1469: 1459: 1455: 1438:ColonelHenry 1433: 1398:ColonelHenry 1393: 1352:ColonelHenry 1347: 1324:ColonelHenry 1319: 1291: 1270:ColonelHenry 1265: 1246:ColonelHenry 1241: 1217:ColonelHenry 1212: 1167:ColonelHenry 1162: 1152: 1117:ColonelHenry 1108: 1097: 1080:ColonelHenry 1058: 1057: 1055: 1041:ColonelHenry 1036: 1027:running mate 1009:ColonelHenry 1004: 990: 988: 966: 949:ColonelHenry 932:ColonelHenry 927: 904:ColonelHenry 899: 876:ColonelHenry 871: 848:ColonelHenry 843: 820:ColonelHenry 818:- revised.-- 815: 792:ColonelHenry 790:- revised.-- 787: 764:ColonelHenry 759: 736:ColonelHenry 731: 727: 704:ColonelHenry 699: 676:ColonelHenry 671: 648: 629:ColonelHenry 602: 588:ColonelHenry 583: 560:ColonelHenry 555: 532:ColonelHenry 523: 478:ColonelHenry 472: 448:ColonelHenry 442: 415:ColonelHenry 409: 405: 369:ColonelHenry 355: 324:ColonelHenry 318: 282:ColonelHenry 276: 239:ColonelHenry 233: 215: 214: 193: 192: 176:ColonelHenry 173: 169: 155:ColonelHenry 152: 136:Citation bot 71: 49: 47: 35: 28: 1689:MOS:CAPTION 1612:non-federal 1567:redundancy. 406:Reply/Done: 319:Reply/Done: 280:disagree.-- 1937:spotchecks 1546:Addressed. 971:Cwmhiraeth 945:Cwmhiraeth 651:Cwmhiraeth 361:WP:SUMMARY 198:Nikkimaria 1996:WP:FAC/ar 1992:candidate 1722:MOS:COMMA 1692:curious.) 1575:Question: 1460:permanent 1185:splitting 365:WP:DETAIL 2014:Ian Rose 1990:: This 1069:my edits 730:- minus 410:specific 131:Analysis 54:Ian Rose 50:promoted 1978:Quadell 1972:Support 1943:Quadell 1908:Quadell 1641:Quadell 1600:Quadell 1523:Quadell 1372:Quadell 1298:Quadell 1191:Quadell 1137:Quadell 991:Support 967:Support 605:or 2016 216:Support 123:Toolbox 87:history 1456:modern 1292:that's 1234:issue. 524:Reply: 473:Reply: 443:Reply: 356:Reply: 277:Reply: 234:Reply: 220:my FAC 194:Images 1109:Reply 1066:- + 95:watch 91:links 16:< 2018:talk 1958:talk 1923:talk 1885:talk 1877:Done 1857:talk 1851:. -- 1849:Done 1825:talk 1817:Done 1797:talk 1789:Done 1768:talk 1760:Done 1740:talk 1732:Done 1720:Per 1708:talk 1700:Done 1676:talk 1668:Done 1625:talk 1583:talk 1554:talk 1507:talk 1478:talk 1470:Done 1442:talk 1434:Done 1402:talk 1394:Done 1356:talk 1348:Done 1328:talk 1320:Done 1290:Ah, 1274:talk 1250:talk 1242:Done 1221:talk 1213:Done 1171:talk 1163:Done 1153:then 1121:talk 1084:talk 1045:talk 1037:Done 1013:talk 1005:Done 975:talk 953:talk 936:talk 928:Done 908:talk 900:Done 880:talk 872:Done 852:talk 844:Done 824:talk 816:Done 796:talk 788:Done 768:talk 760:Done 740:talk 728:Done 708:talk 700:Done 680:talk 672:Done 655:talk 633:talk 614:talk 592:talk 586:. -- 584:Done 564:talk 556:Done 536:talk 501:talk 482:talk 452:talk 419:talk 392:talk 373:talk 328:talk 305:talk 286:talk 263:talk 243:talk 202:talk 180:talk 159:talk 99:logs 83:talk 79:edit 2010:bot 732:-ed 617:) 504:) 395:) 308:) 266:) 52:by 2020:) 2006:}} 2000:{{ 1976:– 1960:) 1952:-- 1941:– 1925:) 1906:– 1887:) 1859:) 1827:) 1799:) 1770:) 1742:) 1734:-- 1710:) 1702:-- 1678:) 1639:– 1627:) 1598:– 1585:) 1556:) 1521:– 1509:) 1480:) 1444:) 1404:) 1396:-- 1370:– 1358:) 1330:) 1322:-- 1296:– 1276:) 1252:) 1223:) 1189:– 1187:. 1173:) 1135:– 1123:) 1086:) 1047:) 1015:) 977:) 955:) 938:) 910:) 882:) 854:) 826:) 798:) 770:) 742:) 734:-- 710:) 682:) 657:) 635:) 594:) 566:) 538:) 484:) 454:) 421:) 375:) 330:) 322:-- 288:) 245:) 204:) 182:) 161:) 97:| 93:| 89:| 85:| 81:| 61:. 33:. 2016:( 1956:( 1921:( 1883:( 1855:( 1841:. 1823:( 1795:( 1766:( 1738:( 1706:( 1674:( 1623:( 1581:( 1552:( 1505:( 1476:( 1440:( 1426:? 1400:( 1354:( 1326:( 1272:( 1248:( 1219:( 1169:( 1119:( 1082:( 1043:( 1011:( 973:( 951:( 934:( 906:( 878:( 850:( 822:( 794:( 766:( 738:( 706:( 678:( 653:( 631:( 611:( 590:( 562:( 534:( 498:( 480:( 450:( 417:( 389:( 371:( 326:( 302:( 284:( 260:( 241:( 200:( 178:( 157:( 101:) 77:(

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Featured article candidates
featured article nomination
Knowledge (XXG) talk:Featured article candidates
Ian Rose
10:01, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

Lieutenant Governor of New Jersey
Lieutenant Governor of New Jersey
edit
talk
history
links
watch
logs
Featured article candidates/Lieutenant Governor of New Jersey/archive1
Featured article review/Lieutenant Governor of New Jersey/archive1
Analysis
Citation bot
External links
ColonelHenry
talk
18:17, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
ColonelHenry
talk
18:17, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Nikkimaria
talk
14:02, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
my FAC
ColonelHenry

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑