1580:, is a spot-check needed? Southern is inconsistently capitalized. I see a fair bit of British local newspapers used, I presume we didn't unintentionally pick up any unreliable outfit? I kind of wonder about the usage of Hansard - using it to cite announcements by ministers seems fine, but I am not sure uses for statements of fact like #94 and #101 are OK. There are a lot of company-affiliated websites, press releases cited, but for technical information so I think it's fine. I confess that I can't tell much about the books cited, not being familiar with British railway literature - nothing jumped out as inappropriate but I wouldn't know any of them from a hole in the ground.
577:" No, but more frustratingly, nothing's been reported in high-quality sources. Electrification and improvements have been talked about for decades, and I'm pretty sure we'll see parliamentary candidates campaigning about it at the next election, but like many things, the COVID pandemic slammed the brakes on everything and it got so far down the priority list, everyone (apart from a few local campaign groups) has forgotten about it. The only recent bit of news I can find is regular hourly services to Winchelsea and Three Oaks, which is covered in the article. We can only report what reliable sources talk about.
2151:), but if the book that I want isn't in stock in the libary that I visit, I can request it. OCC will then check their catalogue to see if there is a copy in any OCC library. If so, they'll transfer it to my local public library; if not, they'll check with other county councils until a copy can be located, which will then be sent to OCC and then on to my local public library. All this is done for a fee, and can take a few weeks. But it does mean that if the only copy in the UK happens to be in Ritchie333's local library, I can still request to borrow it. --
1376:. The Queen's Road bridge gets a mention (I do like me a railway bridge! I sense my to-do list getting longer!) and there's a good write-up on Rye station. There's a fair few column inches on the Hastings line stations but nothing on the Marshlink ones as a group. If any of it's useful I'm happy to send it over but the picking are slimmer than I'd hoped.
291:
be extended to
Hastings and Eastbourne." are entirely saying the same thing. It seems that the lead is saying that the line is unimportant but would still allow for the expansion of High Speed 1 services, while the body seems to be saying that the line is important because it would allow for expansion of High Speed 1
1542:
Don't know how I have managed to miss this FAC till now. I know this line, as I have a good friend in Rye and use the route a fair bit. I am pleased to support the elevation of the article to FA. I have given the text two slow and careful readings and have found nothing to carp at. I note the comment
1416:
I'd love to see a bit more on the architecture if there are any sources that discuss it but I'm happy to take you at your word that you'll incorporate anything you find. I'll send over what I've got on
Hastings and Rye stations in case it's useful for this or other projects. I made one copy edit from
290:
I don't think "The line is strategically important, as electrification and junction improvements would allow High Speed 1 trains direct from St
Pancras International to Hastings." and "Despite its relative unimportance in the national rail network, electrification could allow High Speed 1 services to
2331:
I've sorted out the camera copies. Unfortunately, I didn't grab the right pages, so I'll have to go back and have another look. Unfortunately, I only seem to be able to get ten minutes of time in the library at the moment, which makes it difficult to grab the source material. Still, reviewing what I
1691:
is a discussion in parliament, citing the text "though electrification was rejected in preference to improving the South
Eastern Main Line from Tonbridge to Ashford." This is factually incorrect - electrification of the SEML to Ashford took place in the 1960s, not the 1980s, and reviewing the source
97:
I love travelling on the
Marshlink line; it's an interesting idiosyncrasy on the rail network in South East England. Instead of high speed, high volume, electric commuter services, it's a picturesque run through rural Kent and East Sussex that still fills an important gap in the local rail network.
2123:
A general comment about the book sources - they all came out of my local public library. Some can be loaned out, a number are in the "reference only" section. However, unless someone can get access to the same library (or a similar one) to independently get the books, then I can't see any easy way
239:
This is one of those awkward things that I think needs to be fixed, but simply removing the text probably isn't the answer. We could mention the vehicle road from
Ashford to Hastings, and cite any local Ordnance Survey map, but saying it's "closest" just from a map is going to invite criticism and
2248:
I was hoping to get to the library and sort all of this out this week, but I haven't been in a position to do so. Hopefully, I will be able to get it sorted at a lunchtime next week. Unfortunately, a whole bunch of circumstances, not least the pandemic and then moving house have meant that I'm no
1187:
I like the listed buildings section. Is there anything to say about the buildings on the line (listed or otherwise) as a group? Do we know if the railway employed an in-house architect? Do the buildings follow a consistent architectural style? I have a few books on railway architecture (actually,
1674:
and are used to cite the general claim "The decision to close was delayed several times and continued for the rest of the decade." I'm going to remove this claim as it doesn't really tell us anything that the text around this section doesn't (and indeed, a large important section of the entire
231:
I'm struggling to see how we get to "The nearest equivalent is the A259 from
Hastings to Folkestone via Rye" in the article from "In his speech, the Honourable Member for Rye referred to: the inadequacy of the roads (including the Folkestone to Honiton A259 trunk road) in the South East" in the
1735:
A general note, is the
Hansard reports are probably used as citations because the book sources focus on the 19th and early 20th century, and dry up around the 1980s. However, that also implies that the article should talk less about the line from this period, reflecting the general coverage of
2146:
I don't know where you live, but if you're in the UK the public libraries offer a service called "inter-library loans". For example, my local public library belongs to
Oxfordshire County Council (OCC). and using my OCC library card I can borrow a book from any library in Oxfordshire (and also
1450:
Well over three weeks in and this has received a fair bit of attention, but no indications of support for promotion. Unless this nomination makes significant further progress towards a consensus to promote over the next two or three days I am afraid that it is liable to be archived.
730:
The simple answer is we don't know - all the source material has completely dried up. The simple fact is when I travelled on the line yesterday, it wasn't electrified. A search for sources doesn't come back with anything beyond 2022. So writing anything else is original research.
321:
Just a quick holding reply, most of these issues would benefit from a review of the original source material, most of which is held in reference-only books in my local library. Unfortunately, while I've got time to visit it today, Wednesday is early closing. I'll get back to you!
1195:
A number of the stations were designed by
William Tress as part of a group, so that can be mentioned, though I'd want to go and consult the book sources in the library to double-check if I can. The other buildings date from different time periods and were assessed at different
754:
Hey Ritchie! My FA reviews are mostly prose/grammar and style pedantry. I do review most criteria but 1a tends to account for the majority of comments. These are usually nice and easy to fix though so a long list is not necessarily a reflection on your writing!
1755:
I don't mind the use of Hansard - I actually think that primary sources often are more reliable than news reports, as the latter often present the same information as the former but secondhand - but for certain claims we need more than "an MP claimed this".
1730:
That leaves the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Transport. As this is a primary source close to a specific event, the chances of novel synthesis are low. It's probably okay, but it would be helpful if a contemporary news source could back this
1466:
Thanks for the comment. That would be a shame, as far as I know I have addressed every comment on the review in one way or another. (I was going to comment on the lack of activity somewhere at some point, but wasn't sure how long I should have left it).
1397:, which is a GA like this one currently, though most of that comes from the same sources as this article uses. Still, might be worth adding a sentence or two from Biddle's source if it's not already mentioned here, plus it would be useful for expanding
1996:
and whether or not that implies said announcement was directly linked to the line's future. I've rewritten this sentence to stick closer to what the source says, and explicitly attribute it as an opinion (good for Hansard, as previously discussed).
803:, and while none of them are GA, let alone FA standard, they don't mention the service operator in the opening paragraph of the lead, so I've taken it out. (The inconsistency with caps in the titles might want sorting out at some point....)
223:
It took me some time to find a source explaining the name, and I've not seen any source that mentions why the specific name was chosen. I can only assume it was some random marketing department somewhere that has been lost to the midsts of
556:"In May 2018, the Department of Transport allocated ÂŁ200,000 for further electrification design, with the possibility of completion in 2022 when the existing track life-expires." - 2022 was two years ago, has anything actually happened?
1318:
Unfortunately, the source says "Ore Tunnel closed for 6 months" without any further comment. I'll hunt around to see if any other sources are available, but this is one of the few reliable ones in this decade to say anything on the
769:
Good question. The line is described in sources such as Mitchell / Smith to Brighton, but official network timetables and other documentation only extend to Eastbourne. As sources aren't consistent, I've gone with "Eastbourne and
1107:"defended" is editorialising (it implies that the decision was wrong/controversial in Knowledge's voice without explicitly saying so). You could put the criticism before the defence or just use a more boring verb like "stated".
101:
I've been working on this article for years now, and combed through a large collection of sources that talk about the line in depth. I think it's finally ready to ask the community if it's good enough to meet the FA criteria.
2249:
longer in the position to pop down to the library in 5 minutes and get the answers. I hope you can be patient, but if not then the review might have to be closed as "can't verify". Hopefully it doesn't come to that.
1525:
With the sourcing still under review and this now nearly three full months in, I'm archiving the nomination. I recommend to the nominator getting the sourcing hammered out on the talk page before renominating.
268:
I've gone back to look at Gray's "The South Eastern Railway" and rewritten this. The principal problem was bad weather, and the specific term used in the source is "heel over", which is not the same as "tip
123:
I'll definitely do a full review of this one, but in the meantime as a placeholder I will drop in that there is some grammar disagreement in "this once allowed but were removed for safety reasons"..... --
98:
We're lucky the line exists at all; in the late 60s it was almost certainly going to be closed, but it never quite happened. And there's always the hope of running high speed rail along it at some point.
1288:
What extra context does "would have" add? As I mentioned above, the problem is this is one of several proposed over the last 20 years or so that keeps cropping up with the same detail again and again.
1073:; I haven't criticised your use use of it so far but I feel this one is editorialising—you're disputing the preceding statement in Knowledge's voice rather than letting the facts speak for themselves.
2207:... and are expected to do. It would be odd if a reviewer were able to abrogate responsibility for their use of sources simply by telling the source reviewer they must work it out for themselves!
964:
That's not strictly a grammatical use of "with"; you're using it and the comma to connect two clauses (which also forces the tense change). Better to use a semicolon or split it into two sentences.
1080:
In this case, the only sourced information is an opinion from Norman Baker. So this can be easily fixed by removing the entire sentence and just leaving Baker's opinion to sit in a neutral manner.
1770:
Agreed. I've gone through and removed or re-sourced the Hansard citations that appear to be used beyond a basic personal view of something. Is there anything else specific that needs addressing?
1654:) okay in moderation, but the risk of straying into original research is significant, so should be taken with care. Taking the Hansard references in turn, using citations numbers from that diff:
1711:
However, the incoming franchisee is taking service improvement seriously, and South Central Ltd is investing ÂŁ5 million in measures to improve the quality and perception of customer services.
923:
I've now found a source for DRS and added in the "Services" section. Regarding the original point, you're correct, Southern run the trains, not the line and infrastructure which is run by
618:
As far as I'm aware, they've been addressed (either by fixing the article or expanding on the issue - in this case, that sources have dried up for the future of the line since Covid).
780:
I wonder about the wisdom of including something as ephemeral as a TOC so prominently in the lead. But I suppose it should be mentioned and I can't think of a better way of doing it.
2347:
I've checked off some things above as per the stuff you sent me. I'm afraid tho' that the incomplete figures from Mitchell & Smith 1987 can't be easily matched to a reference.
2316:
Sorry about the delay, the zipped camera copies are too big to send via email, I'll see if I can reduce the size down so they are still visible, but an acceptable size to send.
714:
In May 2018, the Department for Transport allocated ÂŁ200,000 for further electrification design, with the possibility of completion in 2022 when the existing track life-expires.
247:
From what I can tell, the Marshlink line is contiguous with the East Coastway line - shouldn't the connection between the two be mentioned in the route section unless I'm wrong?
880:
671:
Apologies, I'll definitely re-visit this one tonight. The wife is going to be out and I don't think there's anything good on the telly so I should have plenty of time :-) --
1311:
I'm guessing the proposals would require major engineering work on the tunnel but it would be nice to elaborate on what that was if it's supported by the source material.
1845:
21 This source doesn't seem to add anything, but #22 seems to say "half-hourly" not "hourly". The source also implies that the service may have been reintroduced.
1303:
The Marshlink Action Group; however, the information here (new platform at Ashford) can be taken from the Network Rail source, which is a bit more authoritative.
1247:
Is Damian Green's statement noteworthy? Don't local politicians endorse any suggestion that plays well in their constituency, regardless of how plausible it is?
1326:
If we're being pedantic, you don't seem to be treating books consistently—some are cited in full in the footnotes but most use sfns linked to the bibliography.
2089:
It depends on the sources I marked as "Can I have a copy of this source?" - for spotchecks, I insist on having a screenshot or photo of the pertinent page.
1254:
No, now that the "Future" section is more developed. (Amusingly, if I google for "Damian Green Marshlink", I get this FA review in one of the top ten hits).
1510:
spot-checked the sources and made a few corrections, but not from someone independent. I believe that's blocking at least one other support at the moment.
918:). While I don't have the source in front of me (see above comment to Hog Farm), I'm reasonably confident that fails verification, and so I've removed it.
40:
1543:
about the lack of a source review, and will volunteer do one if nobody else steps up, though I am not the world's greatest source reviewer (see under
1727:
Those that attempt to synthesise specific opinions into something more general are straying into original research, and going against FA criteria 1c.
1713:" which is used to cite "In 2000, Southern took over management, and pledged to invest ÂŁ5 million in improving customer service across its network."
1052:
You've used the term multiple terms above but this is the first time it's linked; it's also hyphenated on every other use so far that I've spotted
553:"In 2015, Amber Rudd, Member of Parliament for Hastings The aim is This requires" - verbs are in the present tense, but 2015 was nine years ago.
712:
I've given it another review and made a few little tweaks which it was easier to just make than to raise here but I have one remaining question.
2301:
I managed to get into the library and get camera copies of some of the sources used here. Send me an email and I'll reply with them attached.
2400:
1669:
30:
17:
2411:
1686:
British Rail has tried to upgrade the railway between Ashford and Hastings, because Ashford is the town where everything is going to happen
685:
Considering the nominator wasn't even here for a month, I don't think anyone should rush themselves... Thursday night telly or otherwise!
337:
As implied above, I did pop into the library today and checked a book source, that allowed me to address the comments you've made so far.
985:
On 23 February 1966, the Ministry of Transport confirmed the branch to New Romney would close to passengers, which it did on 6 March 1967
521:
That's what I got as far as "announced plans for British Rail to start electrification by 1995" - will pop back and do the rest later --
911:
1716:
is a speech by the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Transport on an accident on the Dungeness goods branch on 26 April 1984.
2031:
Yes, the paragraph above says "Class 171 "Turbostar" Diesel Multiple Units", so I felt an additional description here was redundant.
1132:
and needs a hyphen, and you've changed tense for no apparent reason (I'd lose the comma and go with "remove" and you should be fine).
1696:
lines, and specifying that the Tonbridge - Ashford line was earmarked for improvements, but saying nothing about Ashford - Hastings.
1401:, which could be improved to GA at some point, having an interesting history as a centre point between the SER and LBSCR's rivalry.
1394:
1852:
The source appears to have changed. I don't believe half-hour services are possible given the layout of the track, and Southern's
276:"and funded with a ÂŁ2,800 capital." - this would not be grammatically correct in American English - is it okay in British English?
161:
Couple of iterations of 'political importance' / 'significance' in the lead. Definitely investing in popcorn futures though  ;)
2369:
2340:
2324:
2309:
2257:
2132:
2111:
2039:
2005:
1985:
1959:
1864:
1831:
1778:
1747:
1638:
1518:
1475:
1409:
1365:
1176:
739:
630:
585:
544:
464:
407:
345:
330:
184:
150:
110:
88:
872:
Would "southwards from Platforms 1 and 2" make more sense or is it just me? And are we confident in "Platform" as a proper noun?
2427:
2371:
2356:
2342:
2326:
2311:
2291:
2273:
2259:
2243:
2213:
2194:
2177:
2163:
2134:
2113:
2098:
2084:
2063:
2041:
2007:
1987:
1961:
1924:
1893:
1866:
1833:
1802:
1780:
1765:
1749:
1640:
1630:
I'm being dense - I've double checked all the web citations, and I can't see any obvious difference between the two. Sorry :-/
1615:
1589:
1566:
1532:
1520:
1494:
1482:
I'll try and get back to this in the next few days with a view to supporting. There are no glaring issues as far as I can see.
1477:
1460:
1433:
1411:
1388:
1367:
1351:
1178:
1157:
855:
741:
725:
691:
680:
666:
649:
632:
613:
587:
568:
559:"In October, a proposal was chaired" - October of which year (2019, I think.....?). Again, has anything actually happened? --
546:
530:
466:
439:
423:
409:
386:
363:
347:
332:
315:
210:
186:
167:
152:
133:
112:
90:
2278:
If the source review is successful and the nomination still needs eyes on the prose, let me know and I'll be happy to review.
1856:
makes no mention of them existing at all. Consequently, I've moved this out of the current services section and into history.
2208:
686:
536:
I've addressed these issues as reported so far, though in some cases I've gone back and copyedited the original sentence.
162:
2103:
Damn, I could have done all this last Saturday. I'll have to get back to you, the library has reduced its opening hours.
1700:
498:"Work began on 8 April 1881 and the line opened to Dungeness on 7 December that year" (it wasn't the work that opened)
2075:, that does not sound good. Anything further since you last looked at it, or is this looking like a SR fail? Thanks.
2361:
I've managed to get camera copies of Mitchell & Smith now, and I'll package them up and send them over in a mo.
1793:, as Ritchie333 is a first-time nominator, both a sources spot check and a plagiarism check will be needed. Thanks.
830:
It's not clear who the subject of this clause is (Tony1 calls it "noun-plusing") and it doesn't strictly make sense
800:
399:, and it completely screwed up the infobox formatting, rendering the article completely unreadable. (See history)
1114:
Changed to "the company said", the aim here is to present the POV of both the rail company and the local council.
456:
That seems to work well. I remember wrestling with the images on the table for listed structures some time ago.
2168:'Afraid that I live on the continent. Going by Worldcat most of these books don't exist in my country, either.
1398:
977:
Removed "Army" as I think it's obvious from context that "World War I" and "camps" is within a military context
859:
1951:. Map 1 marks the line as "between 5,000 and 10,000 passengers, while map 9 shows it as proposed for closure.
2352:
2269:
2173:
2094:
2059:
1920:
1889:
1761:
1611:
1585:
905:
792:
216:
Since it's mentioned the origin of the name "Marshlink", is it known how the railway came up with this name?
716:- 2022 was two years ago, so has the track by now "life-expired"? If so, what did this lead to.......? --
2080:
1798:
1456:
721:
676:
662:
645:
609:
564:
526:
129:
1915:
This checks out, although you may want to say in the article what the conclusion of this accusation was.
484:"the line is then double-track" vs "After the tunnel, the line is double track" - inconsistent hyphen use
2189:
1853:
1489:
1428:
1383:
1346:
1152:
1502:
I think the principal issue is there hasn't been an in-depth spot check of the sources. There's been a
1002:
mentions not just the date, but the specific times. So I think these dates need to be there to meet 1b.
604:, have all of Chris's comments been addressed? If not, could you. If so, could you ping them. Thanks.
2367:
2338:
2322:
2307:
2255:
2130:
2109:
2037:
2003:
1983:
1957:
1862:
1829:
1776:
1745:
1659:
1636:
1516:
1473:
1407:
1363:
1174:
1014:
737:
628:
583:
542:
462:
435:
405:
382:
343:
328:
182:
148:
108:
86:
2285:
2159:
1559:
1816:
18 Broken URL, and since it's almost eight years old I don't think we can put it in present tense.
987:
I think both exact dates is excess detail; suggest culling the announcement date to just the year.
941:
I think the exact date is possibly excess detail considering it's not directly related to the line
2348:
2298:
2265:
2227:
2169:
2148:
2141:
2090:
2072:
2055:
1916:
1885:
1790:
1757:
1607:
1581:
1129:
901:
358:
310:
205:
1948:
1122:
would improve capacity between Eastbourne and Hastings, and removing a 2 carriage diesel service
2234:, how is the source review coming along? Has Jo-Jo received photos of the requested pages yet?
1724:
Those that are obviously an opinion of a specific MP, and attributed as such are probably okay.
254:
I think it wasn't mentioned because it wasn't in the source given. I've dropped a source in now
2182:
The easiest way is probably for Ritchie to take photos of the requested pages and email them.
2076:
1794:
1679:
1452:
820:
Changed to "as a priority for military traffic" (as mentioned in the body, cited to Gray 1990)
796:
717:
672:
658:
654:
641:
637:
619:
605:
560:
522:
125:
1188:
probably all the books) so if there's nothing in your sources I'll see if mine have anything.
2422:
2404:
2239:
2183:
1675:
article concentrates on this fact - it was supposed to be closed by Beeching but never was).
1527:
1483:
1422:
1377:
1340:
1165:
1146:
61:
53:
1097:
Changed to "Southern announced services to Brighton would terminate instead at Eastbourne".
2362:
2333:
2317:
2302:
2250:
2231:
2125:
2104:
2032:
1998:
1978:
1952:
1857:
1824:
1771:
1740:
1631:
1511:
1468:
1402:
1358:
1261:
Suggest moving the link on St Pancras to the first mention (if you keep Green's statement)
1169:
732:
623:
601:
578:
537:
457:
431:
400:
378:
338:
323:
177:
143:
103:
81:
1268:
Having tidied this up, the first mention of St Pancras in "Future", where it is mentioned
176:
The mid-19th century fights between railway companies is something incredible to behold.
2403:
has been archived, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see
2279:
2152:
1970:
86 Peyton does not explicitly say that the policy change was the reason for the review?
1554:
999:
72:
1977:
This source appears to be dead / unavailable at the moment. Bit worrying for Hansard.
1651:
1070:
947:
redundancy? Sufficient progress wouldn't be a lack, a lack is clearly not sufficient.
788:
353:
305:
200:
1706:
995:
924:
497:"Work began on 8 April 1881 and opened to Dungeness on 7 December that year" =: -->
1662:, indicated as such (and backed with a secondary source, albeit a local newspaper)
298:
I've rewritten all this (both by addressing the comments here and other later on).
1993:
1710:
1685:
1595:
574:
2418:
2235:
1417:
above that I assume you missed. I think that resolves everything for me so I'll
1125:
142:
Good point, I was wondering how to write that better, I've given it another go.
57:
261:
Any information on how the difficulties in the Romney Marsh soil were mitigated
622:
Can you check your comments to see if there's anything else that needs doing?
240:
accusations of original research. I'll have to think about this one some more.
2124:
that any of the information can be verified, beyond me having a look myself.
1940:
72 Don't think the "less than 10,000 passengers" thing is on the pages given.
1992:
The source is back up. This looks like a difference in interpretation over "
2264:
I can wait. Obviously, the FAC coordinators get a vote too in this regard.
490:
Ore station is linked in multiple places. Check for overlinking generally.
352:
Ping me when this has passed the source review and I'll take another look.
1688:" to cite "By the 1980s, British Rail had started to modernise the route".
508:"The local member of parliament for Rye, Bryant Godman Irvine made" =: -->
1372:
I had a thumb through the most comprehensive books. The best is Biddle's
1088:
Ashford International to Brighton, with Marshlink services only extending
1606:
17 and #18 are about the same source but have different capitalization.
970:
since we haven't specified an army, I wouldn't treat it as a proper noun
939:
On 27 July 1846, the LBR and BLHR amalgamated with several other lines
845:
The change was one of several in the region, including the "1066 line"
1333:
No problems with being pedantic if it makes the article better. Done.
893:
pedantic, but doesn't DRS operate the trains, not the infrastructure?
2054:
A bit uneasy that almost every accessible source has a discrepancy.
1994:
in the light of his recent announcement about future railway policy.
509:"The local member of parliament for Rye, Bryant Godman Irvine, made"
39:
Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in
813:
how? To say it and not elaborate arguably makes it a peacock term.
1684:
is an opinion of Charles Kerr, 2nd Baron Teviot, using the text "
430:
works fine, although you could use another type if you prefer.
998:
seem to be well-known in rail enthusiast circles; for example
994:
I have to disagree. Closure dates, especially related to the
962:
was granted on 24 July 1882, with the line opening on 19 June
762:
Surely Brighton is the primary destination in that direction?
2024:
123 Does "Class 171" (article) mean "diesel train" (source)?
1124:
Sorry, several problems here: the numeral should be a word (
1145:
Will be back with more later. Ran out of time before work!
512:"In 1969, Railway Magazine announced the remainder " =: -->
1067:
However, the Marshlink line continued to attract criticism
837:
Changed to "Some trains had the name painted on the side."
891:
freight-only branch line operated by Direct Rail Services
513:"In 1969, Railway Magazine announced that the remainder "
494:"On 5 August 1873, the SER were authorised" (UK spelling)
2204:
1809:
1577:
915:
427:
396:
65:
1217:
Isn't DMU train (in the caption) a bit of a tautology?
900:
According to "Who Wrote That", this text was added by
304:
I think that's it from me for the first read-through.
1808:OK; spot-check (with plagiarism check included) on
1598:" - apologies, I can't see where, can you specify?
847:
1066 line was one of several changes in the region?
2332:did get has allowed me to make a few corrections.
493:"On 5 August 1873, the SER were authorized" =: -->
2435:The above discussion is preserved as an archive.
954:Removed "sufficient" (sounds like Tony1 exercise)
1203:Spell out diesel multiple unit on first mention.
787:I had a look at some related articles, such as
43:. No further edits should be made to this page.
1309:Both proposals required closing the Ore Tunnel
1012:the definite article is part of the RM's name—
945:complained about a lack of sufficient progress
870:Services run from Platforms 1 and 2 southwards
862:was branded the "1066 line" at the same time."
199:I intend to review this over the coming week.
2441:No further edits should be made to this page.
2417:template in place on the talk page until the
1692:gives me the impression the debate was about
1033:taking a longer journey, buying their tickets
29:The following is an archived discussion of a
8:
1823:I've replaced it with a current timetable.
1709:, but I'd like to find another source for "
828:painting the name on selected rolling stock
501:"following in the Railways Act 1921" =: -->
1739:I'll go and fix the obvious problems now.
1665:appears to be redundant and can be removed
1281:required? I'm guessing nothing came of it?
811:and was considered strategically important
505:Winchelsea image caption needs a full stop
41:Knowledge talk:Featured article candidates
1650:Hansard is, in my view (and backed up at
516:"and the figures did not consider" =: -->
1947:The source says "Maps 1 - 9", which is
1596:Southern is inconsistently capitalized.
517:"and that the figures did not consider"
487:Doleham image caption needs a full stop
1298:and what does "chair" a proposal mean?
713:
575:Again, has anything actually happened?
2021:120 Can I have a copy of this source?
1912:49 Can I have a copy of this source?
1881:39 Can I have a copy of this source?
1670:John Morris, Baron Morris of Aberavon
760:East Coastway line towards Eastbourne
18:Knowledge:Featured article candidates
7:
1937:67 Can I have a copy of this source?
1934:55 Can I have a copy of this source?
1931:51 Can I have a copy of this source?
1909:45 Can I have a copy of this source?
1906:43 Can I have a copy of this source?
1903:42 Can I have a copy of this source?
1900:40 Can I have a copy of this source?
1878:34 Can I have a copy of this source?
1875:33 Can I have a copy of this source?
1842:20 Can I have a copy of this source?
1374:Britain's Historic Railway Buildings
1296:That October, a proposal was chaired
1059:Should be "single-track" with a dash
968:numerous Army camps were established
879:Changed. Regarding caps, looking at
2190:
1490:
1429:
1384:
1347:
1153:
1050:The line was single tracked between
1232:In November 2017, it was suggested
1168:I've addressed everything so far.
778:Services are provided by Southern.
24:
1395:Rye railway station (East Sussex)
1276:This required remodelling Ashford
1105:The company defended the decision
502:"following the Railways Act 1921"
1035:same problem as "painting" above
1010:In 1969, Railway Magazine wrote
2203:that reviewers and responders
1357:Thanks for the review so far!
1339:I think that's it it from me.
1090:same ", with" problem as above
422:The problem with that is that
1:
2201:that's exactly the same thing
1412:18:40, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
1389:18:58, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
364:18:06, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
1701:Roger Freeman, Baron Freeman
1368:13:15, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
1352:12:36, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
1179:11:42, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
1158:14:29, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
588:10:39, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
569:17:13, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
547:12:49, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
531:12:06, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
467:16:00, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
440:15:57, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
410:10:57, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
387:05:41, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
348:18:26, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
333:12:51, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
316:00:29, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
211:21:38, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
187:16:51, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
168:14:46, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
153:16:51, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
134:11:34, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
113:10:54, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
91:10:54, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
2412:featured article candidates
31:featured article nomination
2458:
2343:17:50, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
2327:13:57, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
2312:15:09, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
2292:13:19, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
2274:07:34, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
2260:13:50, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
2244:13:13, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
2195:09:27, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
2178:08:19, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
2164:17:04, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
2135:10:24, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
2114:10:26, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
2099:10:22, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
2085:16:22, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
2064:07:59, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
2042:13:21, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
2008:10:21, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
1988:13:21, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
1962:10:16, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
1867:13:21, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
1834:13:21, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
1803:17:57, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
1781:16:38, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
1766:16:24, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
1750:15:32, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
1641:16:38, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
1616:16:24, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
1590:14:47, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
883:, it would appear correct.
854:Changed to "The line from
742:18:01, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
726:19:54, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
692:16:38, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
681:16:14, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
667:16:11, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
650:16:19, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
633:11:59, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
614:19:38, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
2424:Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs
2214:12:49, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
2199:Agreed. Also noting that
1567:21:36, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
1529:Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs
1521:09:42, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
1495:16:54, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
1478:15:22, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
1461:14:56, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
1434:23:21, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
377:Don't use fixed px size.
2438:Please do not modify it.
2191:Penny for your thoughts?
1491:Penny for your thoughts?
1430:Penny for your thoughts?
1399:Hastings railway station
1385:Penny for your thoughts?
1348:Penny for your thoughts?
1154:Penny for your thoughts?
36:Please do not modify it.
2428:14:09, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
2372:15:03, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
2357:07:41, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
1925:07:41, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
1894:07:41, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
1533:14:09, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
1128:), "two carriage" is a
793:South Eastern Main Line
1538:Support from Tim riley
1018:; also suggest linking
2210:——Serial Number 54129
801:Ashford–Ramsgate line
688:——Serial Number 54129
2050:126 Needs an archive
1660:Bryant Godman Irvine
1015:The Railway Magazine
914:) on 10 March 2005 (
1446:Coordinator comment
2149:Reading, Berkshire
1854:official timetable
1130:compound adjective
2122:
1884:This checks out.
1705:is an opinion of
1699:is an opinion of
1680:Michael Heseltine
1678:is an opinion of
1668:is an opinion of
1658:is an opinion of
1393:There's a lot on
797:Chatham Main Line
93:
2449:
2440:
2425:
2416:
2410:
2407:, and leave the
2288:
2282:
2211:
2205:traditionally do
2192:
2155:
2145:
2120:
1995:
1712:
1687:
1597:
1572:Source reviewish
1564:
1562:
1557:
1530:
1492:
1431:
1386:
1349:
1155:
689:
576:
165:
79:
48:The article was
38:
2457:
2456:
2452:
2451:
2450:
2448:
2447:
2446:
2445:
2436:
2423:
2414:
2408:
2286:
2280:
2209:
2153:
2139:
1574:
1560:
1555:
1553:
1540:
1528:
1448:
1069:"However" is a
881:a random source
856:Tunbridge Wells
752:
687:
481:
362:
314:
209:
197:
163:
120:
76:
34:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
2455:
2453:
2444:
2443:
2431:
2430:
2421:goes through.
2393:
2392:
2391:
2390:
2389:
2388:
2387:
2386:
2385:
2384:
2383:
2382:
2381:
2380:
2379:
2378:
2377:
2376:
2375:
2374:
2345:
2276:
2224:
2223:
2222:
2221:
2220:
2219:
2218:
2217:
2216:
2118:
2117:
2116:
2052:
2051:
2047:
2046:
2045:
2044:
2026:
2025:
2022:
2019:
2015:
2014:
2013:
2012:
2011:
2010:
1972:
1971:
1967:
1966:
1965:
1964:
1942:
1941:
1938:
1935:
1932:
1929:
1928:
1927:
1910:
1907:
1904:
1901:
1898:
1897:
1896:
1879:
1876:
1872:
1871:
1870:
1869:
1847:
1846:
1843:
1839:
1838:
1837:
1836:
1818:
1817:
1806:
1805:
1786:
1785:
1784:
1783:
1733:
1732:
1728:
1725:
1720:Of that list:
1718:
1717:
1714:
1703:
1697:
1689:
1682:
1676:
1672:
1666:
1663:
1648:
1647:
1646:
1645:
1644:
1643:
1623:
1622:
1621:
1620:
1619:
1618:
1573:
1570:
1539:
1536:
1500:
1499:
1498:
1497:
1447:
1444:
1443:
1442:
1441:
1440:
1439:
1438:
1437:
1436:
1337:
1336:
1335:
1334:
1328:
1327:
1323:
1322:
1321:
1320:
1313:
1312:
1305:
1304:
1300:
1299:
1292:
1291:
1290:
1289:
1283:
1282:
1272:
1271:
1270:
1269:
1263:
1262:
1258:
1257:
1256:
1255:
1249:
1248:
1244:
1243:
1242:
1241:
1235:
1234:
1228:
1227:
1226:
1225:
1219:
1218:
1214:
1213:
1212:
1211:
1205:
1204:
1200:
1199:
1198:
1197:
1190:
1189:
1184:
1183:
1182:
1181:
1143:
1142:
1141:
1140:
1134:
1133:
1118:
1117:
1116:
1115:
1109:
1108:
1101:
1100:
1099:
1098:
1092:
1091:
1084:
1083:
1082:
1081:
1075:
1074:
1063:
1062:
1061:
1060:
1054:
1053:
1046:
1045:
1044:
1043:
1037:
1036:
1029:
1028:
1027:
1026:
1020:
1019:
1006:
1005:
1004:
1003:
1000:Waverley Route
989:
988:
981:
980:
979:
978:
972:
971:
965:
958:
957:
956:
955:
949:
948:
942:
935:
934:
933:
932:
931:
930:
929:
928:
895:
894:
887:
886:
885:
884:
874:
873:
866:
865:
864:
863:
849:
848:
841:
840:
839:
838:
832:
831:
824:
823:
822:
821:
815:
814:
807:
806:
805:
804:
782:
781:
774:
773:
772:
771:
764:
763:
751:
748:
747:
746:
745:
744:
709:
708:
707:
706:
705:
704:
703:
702:
701:
700:
699:
698:
697:
696:
695:
694:
593:
592:
591:
590:
557:
554:
550:
549:
519:
518:
514:
510:
506:
503:
499:
495:
491:
488:
485:
480:
477:
476:
475:
474:
473:
472:
471:
470:
469:
447:
446:
445:
444:
443:
442:
415:
414:
413:
412:
390:
389:
369:
368:
367:
366:
356:
350:
308:
302:
301:
300:
299:
293:
292:
287:
286:
285:
284:
278:
277:
273:
272:
271:
270:
263:
262:
258:
257:
256:
255:
249:
248:
244:
243:
242:
241:
234:
233:
228:
227:
226:
225:
218:
217:
203:
196:
193:
192:
191:
190:
189:
171:
170:
158:
157:
156:
155:
137:
136:
119:
116:
95:
94:
80:Nominator(s):
75:
73:Marshlink line
70:
69:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2454:
2442:
2439:
2433:
2432:
2429:
2426:
2420:
2413:
2406:
2402:
2398:
2395:
2394:
2373:
2370:
2368:
2366:
2365:
2360:
2359:
2358:
2354:
2350:
2349:Jo-Jo Eumerus
2346:
2344:
2341:
2339:
2337:
2336:
2330:
2329:
2328:
2325:
2323:
2321:
2320:
2315:
2314:
2313:
2310:
2308:
2306:
2305:
2300:
2299:Jo-Jo Eumerus
2297:
2296:
2295:
2294:
2293:
2289:
2283:
2277:
2275:
2271:
2267:
2266:Jo-Jo Eumerus
2263:
2262:
2261:
2258:
2256:
2254:
2253:
2247:
2246:
2245:
2241:
2237:
2233:
2229:
2228:Jo-Jo Eumerus
2225:
2215:
2212:
2206:
2202:
2198:
2197:
2196:
2193:
2187:
2186:
2181:
2180:
2179:
2175:
2171:
2170:Jo-Jo Eumerus
2167:
2166:
2165:
2161:
2157:
2150:
2143:
2142:Jo-Jo Eumerus
2138:
2137:
2136:
2133:
2131:
2129:
2128:
2119:
2115:
2112:
2110:
2108:
2107:
2102:
2101:
2100:
2096:
2092:
2091:Jo-Jo Eumerus
2088:
2087:
2086:
2082:
2078:
2074:
2070:
2069:
2068:
2067:
2066:
2065:
2061:
2057:
2056:Jo-Jo Eumerus
2049:
2048:
2043:
2040:
2038:
2036:
2035:
2030:
2029:
2028:
2027:
2023:
2020:
2017:
2016:
2009:
2006:
2004:
2002:
2001:
1991:
1990:
1989:
1986:
1984:
1982:
1981:
1976:
1975:
1974:
1973:
1969:
1968:
1963:
1960:
1958:
1956:
1955:
1950:
1946:
1945:
1944:
1943:
1939:
1936:
1933:
1930:
1926:
1922:
1918:
1917:Jo-Jo Eumerus
1914:
1913:
1911:
1908:
1905:
1902:
1899:
1895:
1891:
1887:
1886:Jo-Jo Eumerus
1883:
1882:
1880:
1877:
1874:
1873:
1868:
1865:
1863:
1861:
1860:
1855:
1851:
1850:
1849:
1848:
1844:
1841:
1840:
1835:
1832:
1830:
1828:
1827:
1822:
1821:
1820:
1819:
1815:
1814:
1813:
1811:
1804:
1800:
1796:
1792:
1788:
1787:
1782:
1779:
1777:
1775:
1774:
1769:
1768:
1767:
1763:
1759:
1758:Jo-Jo Eumerus
1754:
1753:
1752:
1751:
1748:
1746:
1744:
1743:
1737:
1729:
1726:
1723:
1722:
1721:
1715:
1708:
1704:
1702:
1698:
1695:
1690:
1683:
1681:
1677:
1673:
1671:
1667:
1664:
1661:
1657:
1656:
1655:
1653:
1642:
1639:
1637:
1635:
1634:
1629:
1628:
1627:
1626:
1625:
1624:
1617:
1613:
1609:
1608:Jo-Jo Eumerus
1605:
1604:
1603:
1602:
1601:
1600:
1599:
1592:
1591:
1587:
1583:
1582:Jo-Jo Eumerus
1579:
1571:
1569:
1568:
1565:
1563:
1558:
1550:
1546:
1537:
1535:
1534:
1531:
1523:
1522:
1519:
1517:
1515:
1514:
1509:
1505:
1496:
1493:
1487:
1486:
1481:
1480:
1479:
1476:
1474:
1472:
1471:
1465:
1464:
1463:
1462:
1458:
1454:
1445:
1435:
1432:
1426:
1425:
1420:
1415:
1414:
1413:
1410:
1408:
1406:
1405:
1400:
1396:
1392:
1391:
1390:
1387:
1381:
1380:
1375:
1371:
1370:
1369:
1366:
1364:
1362:
1361:
1356:
1355:
1354:
1353:
1350:
1344:
1343:
1332:
1331:
1330:
1329:
1325:
1324:
1317:
1316:
1315:
1314:
1310:
1307:
1306:
1302:
1301:
1297:
1294:
1293:
1287:
1286:
1285:
1284:
1280:
1277:
1274:
1273:
1267:
1266:
1265:
1264:
1260:
1259:
1253:
1252:
1251:
1250:
1246:
1245:
1239:
1238:
1237:
1236:
1233:
1230:
1229:
1223:
1222:
1221:
1220:
1216:
1215:
1209:
1208:
1207:
1206:
1202:
1201:
1194:
1193:
1192:
1191:
1186:
1185:
1180:
1177:
1175:
1173:
1172:
1167:
1164:
1163:
1162:
1161:
1160:
1159:
1156:
1150:
1149:
1138:
1137:
1136:
1135:
1131:
1127:
1123:
1120:
1119:
1113:
1112:
1111:
1110:
1106:
1103:
1102:
1096:
1095:
1094:
1093:
1089:
1086:
1085:
1079:
1078:
1077:
1076:
1072:
1071:word to watch
1068:
1065:
1064:
1058:
1057:
1056:
1055:
1051:
1048:
1047:
1041:
1040:
1039:
1038:
1034:
1031:
1030:
1024:
1023:
1022:
1021:
1017:
1016:
1011:
1008:
1007:
1001:
997:
993:
992:
991:
990:
986:
983:
982:
976:
975:
974:
973:
969:
966:
963:
960:
959:
953:
952:
951:
950:
946:
943:
940:
937:
936:
926:
922:
921:
920:
919:
917:
913:
910:
907:
903:
902:Peter Shearan
899:
898:
897:
896:
892:
889:
888:
882:
878:
877:
876:
875:
871:
868:
867:
861:
857:
853:
852:
851:
850:
846:
843:
842:
836:
835:
834:
833:
829:
826:
825:
819:
818:
817:
816:
812:
809:
808:
802:
798:
794:
790:
789:Hastings line
786:
785:
784:
783:
779:
776:
775:
768:
767:
766:
765:
761:
758:
757:
756:
749:
743:
740:
738:
736:
735:
729:
728:
727:
723:
719:
715:
711:
710:
693:
690:
684:
683:
682:
678:
674:
670:
669:
668:
664:
660:
656:
653:
652:
651:
647:
643:
639:
636:
635:
634:
631:
629:
627:
626:
621:
617:
616:
615:
611:
607:
603:
599:
598:
597:
596:
595:
594:
589:
586:
584:
582:
581:
572:
571:
570:
566:
562:
558:
555:
552:
551:
548:
545:
543:
541:
540:
535:
534:
533:
532:
528:
524:
515:
511:
507:
504:
500:
496:
492:
489:
486:
483:
482:
478:
468:
465:
463:
461:
460:
455:
454:
453:
452:
451:
450:
449:
448:
441:
437:
433:
429:
426:was not set.
425:
421:
420:
419:
418:
417:
416:
411:
408:
406:
404:
403:
398:
394:
393:
392:
391:
388:
384:
380:
376:
375:
374:
373:
365:
361:
360:
355:
351:
349:
346:
344:
342:
341:
336:
335:
334:
331:
329:
327:
326:
320:
319:
318:
317:
313:
312:
307:
297:
296:
295:
294:
289:
288:
282:
281:
280:
279:
275:
274:
267:
266:
265:
264:
260:
259:
253:
252:
251:
250:
246:
245:
238:
237:
236:
235:
230:
229:
222:
221:
220:
219:
215:
214:
213:
212:
208:
207:
202:
194:
188:
185:
183:
181:
180:
175:
174:
173:
172:
169:
166:
160:
159:
154:
151:
149:
147:
146:
141:
140:
139:
138:
135:
131:
127:
122:
121:
117:
115:
114:
111:
109:
107:
106:
99:
92:
89:
87:
85:
84:
78:
77:
74:
71:
68:
66:
64:) 2 May 2024
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
37:
32:
27:
26:
19:
2437:
2434:
2397:Closing note
2396:
2363:
2334:
2318:
2303:
2251:
2200:
2184:
2126:
2105:
2077:Gog the Mild
2053:
2033:
1999:
1979:
1953:
1858:
1825:
1810:this version
1807:
1795:Gog the Mild
1772:
1741:
1738:
1734:
1719:
1707:Norman Baker
1693:
1649:
1632:
1593:
1578:this version
1575:
1552:
1549:bloody awful
1548:
1544:
1541:
1524:
1512:
1507:
1503:
1501:
1484:
1469:
1453:Gog the Mild
1449:
1423:
1418:
1403:
1378:
1373:
1359:
1341:
1338:
1308:
1295:
1278:
1275:
1231:
1170:
1147:
1144:
1121:
1104:
1087:
1066:
1049:
1032:
1013:
1009:
996:Beeching Axe
984:
967:
961:
944:
938:
925:Network Rail
908:
890:
869:
844:
827:
810:
777:
759:
753:
733:
718:ChrisTheDude
673:ChrisTheDude
659:Gog the Mild
655:ChrisTheDude
642:Gog the Mild
624:
620:ChrisTheDude
606:Gog the Mild
579:
561:ChrisTheDude
538:
523:ChrisTheDude
520:
458:
401:
372:Image review
371:
370:
357:
339:
324:
309:
303:
204:
198:
178:
144:
126:ChrisTheDude
104:
100:
96:
82:
49:
47:
35:
28:
2185:HJÂ Mitchell
1485:HJÂ Mitchell
1424:HJÂ Mitchell
1379:HJÂ Mitchell
1342:HJÂ Mitchell
1166:HJ Mitchell
1148:HJÂ Mitchell
1126:MOS:NUMERAL
283:Copy edited
54:David Fuchs
2364:Ritchie333
2335:Ritchie333
2319:Ritchie333
2304:Ritchie333
2252:Ritchie333
2232:Ritchie333
2127:Ritchie333
2106:Ritchie333
2034:Ritchie333
2000:Ritchie333
1980:Ritchie333
1954:Ritchie333
1859:Ritchie333
1826:Ritchie333
1773:Ritchie333
1742:Ritchie333
1633:Ritchie333
1576:Reviewing
1513:Ritchie333
1506:one where
1470:Ritchie333
1404:Ritchie333
1360:Ritchie333
1279:would have
1171:Ritchie333
770:Brighton".
734:Ritchie333
625:Ritchie333
602:Ritchie333
580:Ritchie333
539:Ritchie333
459:Ritchie333
432:Nikkimaria
402:Ritchie333
379:Nikkimaria
340:Ritchie333
325:Ritchie333
179:Ritchie333
145:Ritchie333
105:Ritchie333
83:Ritchie333
2405:WP:FAC/ar
2401:candidate
2281:Anarchyte
1736:sources.
1556:Tim riley
1240:Clarified
2399:: This
1949:this one
1504:de-facto
1319:subject.
1042:Reworded
912:contribs
860:Hastings
479:Comments
397:did that
354:Hog Farm
306:Hog Farm
201:Hog Farm
164:——Serial
118:Comments
50:archived
1545:useless
1419:support
657:Nudge.
2236:FrB.TG
2156:rose64
2018:111 OK
1652:WP:RSP
1196:times.
269:over".
232:source
58:FACBot
2073:Jo-Jo
1791:Jo-Jo
1551:). –
750:Harry
638:Chris
16:<
2353:talk
2287:talk
2270:talk
2240:talk
2230:and
2174:talk
2160:talk
2158:🌹 (
2121:(ec)
2095:talk
2081:talk
2060:talk
1921:talk
1890:talk
1799:talk
1762:talk
1694:both
1612:talk
1586:talk
1561:talk
1547:and
1457:talk
1224:Done
1210:Done
1139:Done
1025:Done
916:diff
906:talk
799:and
722:talk
677:talk
663:talk
646:talk
610:talk
565:talk
527:talk
436:talk
428:This
424:type
383:talk
359:Talk
311:Talk
224:time
206:Talk
130:talk
62:talk
56:via
2419:bot
2226:Hi
2154:Red
2071:Hi
1789:Hi
1731:up.
858:to
600:Hi
52:by
2415:}}
2409:{{
2355:)
2290:)
2272:)
2242:)
2188:|
2176:)
2162:)
2097:)
2083:)
2062:)
1923:)
1892:)
1812::
1801:)
1764:)
1614:)
1588:)
1488:|
1459:)
1427:|
1421:.
1382:|
1345:|
1151:|
795:,
791:,
724:)
679:)
665:)
648:)
640:?
612:)
567:)
529:)
438:)
395:I
385:)
195:HF
132:)
67:.
33:.
2351:(
2284:(
2268:(
2238:(
2172:(
2144::
2140:@
2093:(
2079:(
2058:(
1919:(
1888:(
1797:(
1760:(
1610:(
1594:"
1584:(
1508:I
1455:(
927:.
909:·
904:(
720:(
675:(
661:(
644:(
608:(
573:"
563:(
525:(
434:(
381:(
128:(
60:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.