3810:"No Line on the Horizon debuted at number one in 30 countries, including Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Ireland, Japan, the Netherlands, Portugal, the United Kingdom, and the United States. As of June 2009 over five million copies had been sold worldwide. Within one week of release, the album was certified platinum in Brazil, a record for the country. In the United Kingdom, the album became U2's tenth number-one album, making them the fifth-most-successful act on the UK Albums Chart. In the United States, it was U2's seventh number-one album; first-week sales exceeded 484,000, the band's second-highest figures after How to Dismantle an Atomic Bomb."
3635:"The film originated from a U2 video shoot in June 2007, during which Corbijn asked the band to remain still while he filmed them to create a "photograph on film"; the band did not move but the objects around them did. Impressed, the band believed that the online album listening experience could be enhanced with moving imagery. In May 2008, they commissioned Corbijn to create the film." - I found this confusing; the film originated in June 2007, yet it was not commissioned until May 2008. Would it be accurate to begin instead, "The
385:
know of any FA article on a song or album which does not contain cover artwork. The common sense consensus appears to be that album artwork is an instance where fair-use images are acceptable, and I would say that their removal is definitely reaching well past that fine balance. I do not plan on removing the image on the article, but will leave it up to all of the other reviewers to determine for themselves if the inclusion of the album artwork in the article is acceptable or not.
3849:"Conflicting tenses: switches from past to present part way through "U2 staged a worldwide stadium tour ... the tour included ... concerts feature ... audience surrounds ... the concert stage is". It's akin to the forthcoming album problem (which has now been addressed above): planned in the past, but ongoing now. The switch surprises the reader with the realization that it's not something in the past being discussed after all. Probably needs recasting one way or the other.
824:
a detailed prose review by the middle of the week—with specific, easily-actionable comments—I'll try to have another run through. One thing: I disagree with Tony's comment about the opening passage; IMO, it's more idiomatic to say "of U2's career" than "since U2's inception". Plus, the latter (very, very faintly) implies there was a longer gap, way back when. So whom do you listen to? Rock, meet hard place. :-D (I'll have a think on it and try to come up with a third way.)
3664:"In February 2009, Bono stated that by the end of the year U2 would release an album consisting of discarded material from the No Line on the Horizon sessions. Bono labelled it "a more meditative album on the theme of pilgrimage". Provisionally titled Songs of Ascent, it will be a sister release ..." - confusing, because we start the sentence with the impression that this is something that happened over a year ago, yet we segue into "it will be" and so forth.
2044:—album cover in infoxbox. Although I'm sympathetic to Fasach Nua's view above—indeed, I respect his/her position a lot—current consensus is that non-free album artwork is suitable for identification of the subject where a free version is unavailable. Wider community consultation is needed to overturn that seeming consensus; as such, individual FACs are not the place to have this discussion.
3516:
critics noted that the album was not as experimental as previously suggested." Can U2's original statement be brought out more clearly? It seems like an incidental remark, so the connection is not immediate when we arrive at what the critics note at the end. The specific term that applied in this case (pre-release publicity, announcement or whatever) rather than "said" would help.
1020:
review. Personally I like those boxes because they put an album in its immediate historical context. But, as I say, you have to argue for them all or for none at all. If the adjacent albums had succession boxes I would strongly argue that this album should have one too, otherwise we're messing with people who want to navigate through a chronological procession of album articles. --
3613:. I've reworded it to "At the end of the sessions, the band chose to include "White as Snow", a song about a dying soldier in Afghanistan, to balance out the earlier, rockier tunes", though I know this now means there is some repetition. Since it is sourced below, I haven't bothered to use the ref again. Do you think the change helps to provide the needed context?
1926:: I'm a bit nonplussed by the citations style, which consist in most cases of a deadlink on the title, followed by an archive link to the item in question. I have not encountered this method before. What is the purpose of retaining the deadlink? I notice, incidentally, that the live link in Ref. 1 goes to a subscription service, which should be noted.
3883:
1753:: the artist will make a lot more money off the tour than they will off the album. If anything, making an album gives an artist an excuse to stage a big tour. Unless there's a source saying that when the tour visited certain countries there was a significant spike in album sales, this term should go.
3998:
Thanks for the support and for the suggestion. I've added the sentence "The record was not a commercial success for U2, and the group expressed disappointment at the low sales" after the critical reception part in the lead. If you disliked "Moment of
Surrender", why not give "Breathe" or "Fez - Being
3134:
I think that I've addressed all of the hidden questions now. They were definitely limited editions according to the source, so I've removed the word 'considered'. I've done several searches but haven't found any updated sales numbers as of yet that can be included. All that I've seen are forum posts,
2250:
Very strange; for some reason the archiveurl is missing from the template, but it is there in a previous revision from 9 May. I am having no difficulty in opening the page and displaying the content, so I have restored the archive. I believe that the reason it went down (and is continuing to do so on
2098:
field is missing, they display the information in a different order (especially dates) to how they do when the field is filled. Where news and journal articles don't have an author, and where possible, I tend to fill the field with "Staff" to produce a consistent output. This isn't a deal-breaker, by
1748:
In the tour section, I strongly disagree with the use of 'supporting', in both the section title (just call it "360° Tour") and in the text. As the article alludes to briefly, the notion of a tour supporting an album is a vestige of an industry era gone by. Nowadays for established acts it's almost
1291:
Just looking at the "Reception" section, I have several concerns. The box's review ratings are very U.S.-UK centric – 9 from them and 1 from
Ireland. U2 is a band with global appeal, so what about the rest of the world? Continental Europe, Asia, South America? Even if you don't translate a review
971:
I've added the year to the singles table; when the fourth single is released, I'll add a year column to the left-side to make it easier. I disagree with your point on the certifications though. Most album articles I've looked at have them, and I think they are an important component relating to their
354:
Really? In a FAC nomination for a music album, someone is objecting to an image of the album cover? If someone is going to review an album FAC nomination, the least they can do is review previous music FA articles to familiarize themselves with standards/things that are acceptable. The album cover is
339:
I do not know of any pop album that doesn't contain a FU low res image of the album cover, whether they are featured articles or not. However, I've never done a survey so I'd be happy to have them pointed out. Have you had this discussion before on album covers, either about a specific album, or more
1856:
Re-reading this idea, I think it is bordering a bit too far on the optimistic scale for the simple reason that so much of it seems to require a great deal of original research. I've been searching since this was posted close to a week ago, but I have found absolutely nothing on why the setlist order
823:
Hi. I think Tony is probably right in that certain sections will need a polish. All I really did was smooth out some of the bumpier parts, hopefully leaving few enough passages-with-issues that anything specific could be resolved during the FAC. I still stand by that, but if no-one's chipped in with
214:
on this), which I believe now means that the article meets all of the FAC criteria. Do you agree? Disagree? Just felt like dropping by to laugh at a badly written nomination? Whatever your reason for stopping by and reading this, I hope that the article proves an interesting and thorough read on the
205:
gang just over a year ago. Both previous FAC nominations seemed to fail primarily as a result of the lack of reviews; what was brought up at those times (as well as the GAN and three peer reviews) has been addressed as well as my editing schedule on
Knowledge permits. In recent days it has undergone
3922:
There isn't a great deal of information under the singles heading anyways so what I have done is removed the heading and renamed the subsection to "Promotion and singles". I considered "Singles and promotion", but given that there is a great deal more info on the promotional aspect than the singles
1941:
Previously the link on the title was removed, leaving only the archive link. However, we were told to reinstate them (can't find where now) because there are times when the archive website has problems/goes down (such as is occuring today as a result of maintenance on the website), and so the links
1784:
In the tour section, you should briefly mention what role the album's songs play in the show. A block of new songs opened the show in Europe, but that was broken up somewhat in the U.S., was it due to audience restlessness? Was the total number of 'new album' songs comparable to previous tours or
1038:
or some such similar project to either do this or not do this everywhere. It can't be done on an article-by-article basis. Also, I don't think referencing should be an issue – it's up to each individual article to cite that it was a number one album on a given chart, and the boxes just link these
384:
After conversing with a few other users I can see the reasoning behind Fasach Nua's stance a bit more clearly, but I do (and will continue) to disagree with it. Yes, non-free content should be kept to a minimum, but there is a fine balance between reaching that minimum and going beyond it. I do not
369:
Personally, I don't like Fair Use, but I do not see this as a reason to fail an FAC as fair use in this context has broad acceptance. Agree with Y2kcrazyjoker that this FAC is not the place to discuss the merits, or otherwise, of fair use images on album pages as it has wikipedia wide implications.
1857:
was changed, what role the songs play, or comparisons with previous tours. Any major adjustments that I could make along the lines suggested would be so far up the OR lane that it would be unreasonable to make them; the only exceptions are the current tour gross and the number of songs on the DVD.
1812:
Looking more at the Tour section (I'd omit the "U2" in the section title, it's kind of redundant given the context), it should be focused on the tour's relationship to the album, not be a summary of the tour. Thus this sentence is irrelevant here: "The idea for the stage, with some initial design
1514:
I'll do another search, but despite my best efforts previous this is one thing I've never been able to find. It seems near impossible to find sales data released by the companies. We can assume it's at least 1,000,000 since it was certified
Platinum, but those figures are as of late last year. The
3979:
My only niggle is whether the lead is an adequate summary of the article - feel free to make it a little longer, perhaps with a sentence or two more on critical reception / charting / commercial outcome. The article looks comprehensive, though, and well-sourced. Haven't heard this album - thought
3515:
In the lead: "Prior to the album's release, U2 said that Eno's and Lanois's involvement, as well as the band's time in Fez, Morocco, resulted in a more experimental record than their previous two albums. Upon its release, No Line on the
Horizon received generally favourable reviews, although many
3143:
in the past). I was a bit confused by your last question regarding the size of the tour's stage; I've tried to clarify the sentence as best I can by explicitly referring to it as a concert stage and providing a reason for the design. Anything else that I could put in (such as the sound systems in
2103:
Comment: This is a characteristic of the templates. The whole idea of using them is to just put in the relevant information about a cite and let the template writers worry about formatting them consistently. Even if the writers aren't doing the job well at the moment (to which I agree), inserting
1650:
In terms of the album's commercial appeal, the article seems to be overweighing the positive (stressing initial sales and chart placements) and underweighing the negative (overall sales and lack of a hit single). As a result, the last paragraph about low album sales, is jarring to read after all
802:
to all of the points you've brought up about the lead. I did ask a few people if they would be able to do a copyedit before I nominated, but they seemed to think that the current prose is acceptable (and my eyes are so saturated from this article that I doubt I'd see anything no matter how hard I
355:
used to identify the subject of the article, just like in every other FA album article. The argument that the cover could be removed and simply be described with prose in its place can be made for any image ever made. These types of objections are not constructive to passing/failing this article.
2936:
I went through in a previous FAC and substituted all of the primary sources I was able to then. I'll do another search now to replace ones that have been added in since that time, such as the YouTube cite. In some cases though, such as the "Long, Drawn out
Confession" page, the "U2ube" videos by
1421:
though. It's noted on the talk page (I think in the archives) that the present breakdown of reviews reflects the
Metcritic average (72) fairly closely, and I'm hesitant about adding in lower ratings from less known sources at the expense of higher ratings from well known sources for that reason.
1019:
Whoah, wait... succession boxes are part of a chain. If all other #1 albums have them this will be a broken link. So the argument shouldn't be whether there's a succession box on this article but whether either they should ALL go or whether they should ALL stay which is outside the scope of this
2980:
Since it may prove to be contentious and I can't find any demonstration of reliability, I have removed it. This also unfortunately means that I have had to remove the certifications for
Ireland and Italy, since neither IRMA or FIMI provide searchable databases that I can find. As a result I've
3238:
Recording and production: "In
January 2007, lead singer Bono said U2 intended to take their next album in a different musical direction to their previous few releases." Not saying that the grammar here is wrong, but a more common way of putting it would be "in a different direction from their
3598:'At the end of the sessions, the band chose to include "White as Snow" to balance out the earlier, rockier tunes. With the exception of this track, U2 had tried to keep the theme of war out of the album.' - we aren't told that "White as Snow" has a war theme until the later
467:
Sort of strange phrasing here. One place they were recording was a studio, the other was the southern half of a country. If the source gives a more detailed location for where they were recording, you should probably include it here. (If it doesn't, there's not much you can
1877:
I've done my best to integrate the position of the songs during the concerts in both legs (though it required the use of a primary source; see Steve's comments below). I can't see how I can do any more on this front without delving into OR. 2009 gross has also been added.
324:
Guidelines are nothing more than advice on how to do things, the policy is much more important, the guideline refers to criteria one of the policy only. The image can be easily be described with text, and the reference you have given is more than an adequate description
575:
At the end of the Rick Rubin section the article reads " subsequently employed Brian Eno and Daniel Lanois as principal producers and co-writers. Steve
Lillywhite was also brought in to produce a few of the tracks." Do you think producer be slipped in there to clarify?
3266:""Winter" appears in the accompanying Anton Corbijn film, Linear and the 2009 war film Brothers." Hate to be pedantic on the punctuation, but there should either be another comma after "Linear" or none at all in the sentence. Personally, I don't know if one is needed.
880:
Formats table—I suggest removing this entirely. Albums are normally released in a variety of formats; the way you have them listed here is like a shopping catalogue that would interest only the avid collector. At best it can be summarised in two more sentences of
3209:- Have to admit I've read over it a few times because of past mentions on certain talk pages, and I think it's finally at a level where it's ready for FA. I applaud the efforts of MelicansMatkin for sticking with it and writing an excellent article.
2927:
of cites to primary sources to verify information such as when the album was released on particular formats; although these are (generally) accepted, it would preferable to find secondary sources where possible for as many as you can, especially the
3144:
each of the four legs, each individual system alone powerful enough for an arena concert, etc.) would probably be overly technical for an article on the album and is easily found on the Tour page. I hope this clarifies all three of your questions.
2374:
True, but after it's done, and once an article's structure is more stable (usually closer to the end of the FAC), it's very easy to keep on top of it. Post-FAC, the content won't be changing anywhere near enough to make it an annoyance to update.
803:
looked!). I think I'll leave the "Moment of Surrender" sound sample as is for the moment since it does comply with the length standards; if the length does become an issue then it shouldn't be too difficult to reduce it by a couple of seconds.
1817:
songs, good bad or indifferent. Also, bring the section up-to-date: the tour grosses for 2009 are available, and how it ranked for the year. How many HD cameras were used for the Rose Bowl shoot is irrelevant here; instead focus on how many
3753:
Thanks for the feedback thus far. I'll be fairly busy with work over the next week or so, so it may take me a bit longer than usual to respond to any further comments or concerns (though I'll do my best to get to them as quickly as possible).
3370:
Reception: Not a big deal at all, but I found it a bit odd that How to Dismantle an Atomic Bomb has a link at the start of the fourth paragraph of this section when it's unlinked toward the end of the third. I would consider moving that
1320:
After a few days of searching I haven't found anything from continental Europe, Asia, or Oceania (foreign or English language) which assigns a star rating that can be included. I'm afraid it looks like we're stuck with what we've got.
3135:
lists with it as one of the top-selling albums (albeit minus sales figures, even in the original press release by the IFPI), and stats by mediatraffic.de (which as part of the United World Chart is considered unreliable according to
1976:
I honestly can't remember where it was, just that it hppened; it was a half-year ago at least, but I can't find it on my talk or in the previous FACs/PRs/GAN. It may have been on another user's talk page, but I can't recall where.
3113:
Many thanks for all your contributions and for your support; I'll try to address the hidden comments on the morrow if I can find anything for them (as it's close to midnight right now and I need to be up fairly early). Cheers,
1608:, despite whatever that sloppy Reuters story says: "It was their seventh number one album in the United States, placing them third behind The Beatles and the Rolling Stones for the most number one albums in the country." See
3192:- It may be worth noting some of the common musical motifs (however few) that appear throughout the record. For example, the electronic flourishes that Eno contributed to the record and were much ballyhooed prior to release.
2016:
This is another nicely done album article from the nominator. Any comments, suggestions, prose and content issues I've covered in edit summaries and hidden comments while performing a light copyedit over the last week or so.
472:
Yes, this was something that I'd looked at before the last peer review. None of the sources that I could find said what the exact recording location in France was, so I think that we're unfortunately stuck on this point.
3069:
I won’t pretend this is a comprehensive list of source questions/issues; however, successful resolution (or rebuttal!) of these will make further examination easier, and hopefully all that'll I'll spot is the odd typo.
211:
128:
123:
118:
2563:
Current ref no. 30, "Long, Drawn Out Confession": the note about the subscription implies this is a video interview; it should probably say outright, and also include the names of the interviewer and interviewees.
3890:. I share the author of that manual's dislike of these, but believe MoS is silent on the matter, so I will leave it with you to decide whether to do anything about it; if so, the choices appear to be (a) make
1506:
The article doesn't say how many copies have been sold in the U.S. so far; if you give first week sales, you should give the rest (artists with devoted followings often get big initial sales but then tail off
1813:
suggestions, had been proposed to the group by the set designer, Willie Williams, at the end of the Vertigo Tour in 2006." Instead, see if you can incorporate tour show reviews that assessed the role of the
1299:
I've added one or two reviews, but it's proving very difficult to find any in continental Europe and Asia with a star system. One that I did add from Spain was removed just a few minutes ago for that reason.
3293:
In the Songs of Ascent section, I doubt if the Achtung Baby link is necessary, considering there's already one just a little bit up in the text. Interested readers will have likely already clicked on that
254:
It is the cover art; kind of necessary for it to be included in the article. It qualifies as fair use since it is being used to illustrate the album. The rationale for its use is covered on the file page.
3953:'s talk page informing them that I have addressed their comments as it's been a few days since then, but the user has not edited Knowledge since 25 May, a few minutes after leaving the above feedback.
853:
A too-long album infobox. You can make this shorter and simpler just by replacing those recording studios (which should be dealt with in the prose) with "June 2007 – December 2008 at various location".
779:) when the album is still selling well. I've put on a turn there over their utter inflexibility, but beware of this fair-use claim. In any case, could you put it on the right-side under the quote-box?
994:
Succession boxes—And this improves the article how? (I generally have never seen the point of succession boxes—why the focus on #1 albums only, for one.) Also, unreferenced. Strongly suggest removal.
2607:
As above, I think in the interests of giving the reader enough information, we can live with the italics (indeed, I'm not even sure that would be incorrect in this case). So, you could format it as:
1053:
If it's a Project-wide decision for them to be included and needs a Project-wide consensus to be removed then it seems that it is bigger than this one article. As a result I've restored it for now.
520:
I suggest adding the word "rapper" in front of will.i.am so readers don't have to click on will.i.am to figure out who he is. Possibly most people interested in U2 will not have heard of him.
1658:
I've expanded the paragraph and moved it a bit further up so it flows right after the sales figures and such (also making it a bit more chronological); hopefully this makes it less jaring.
3779:"'"No Line on the Horizon" stemmed from Mullen's experiments with different drum beats; Eno sampled and manipulated the patterns, and the rest of the band began to play over it.' - "it"?
3325:
I've added in some hyphens, but someone may want to check to see if I have used the correct format (there seems to be so many different varieties, and I'm always confusing them! ^^;)
1651:
this touting of debut figures. It looks like this part of the article was written as the album was released and not revised. With albums, the race goes to the tortoise not the hare!
2526:
Feel free to tweak to whatever your preferences are, obviously, but for me that rough format gives the reader enough information to work with. We can just live with the italics.
2858:
2523:{{cite video|title=Exclusive interview with U2|people=Bono; Edge, The; Clayton, Adam; Mullen Jr, Larry|publisher=]. ]|medium=Radio broadcast|language=French |date=2009-02-23}}
1792:
As far as I've seen from building the Tour article the reason for this was never discussed by the band, but I will do another search (can't promise I'll find anything though).
1682:
Surely more people than just Bono were disappointed by the sales. What about the record company? What did Paul McGuinness say? What did other industry observers say?
452:. Hello from your neighbor FAC to the north. :) I took a quick peek at this article, and although it is well-referenced and the prose is readable, I have some concerns:
2104:
filler values like this distorts that process. And some news outlets will run an uncredited wire service report, which means inserting "Staff" is not always correct.
955:
Track listing—jeez this is complicated. But I guess there is no other way. However, I can't say I've seen too many rock album tracklistings with a producer column...
1962:
I've never seen this method of linking employed anywhere else; I wonder who told you it had to be done this way? I'm not making an issue of this, but I am curious.
1612:
which has U2 in a tie for 8th. I don't know where a good source is for the full ranking, but third cannot be correct; there were plenty of news outlets, including
2686:
I don't understand why it is. The name uses the title field, which defaults to italics. I thought using |title led to plain text? I changed the template from
3032:
That's fine; I spotted that after I originally left these comments, but felt it prudent not to remove the question, just so we had something on this page.
2360:
Comment: This approach is very hard to maintain on an ongoing basis, since even a slight movement of text will often change what the first instance is.
88:
83:
40:
2340:
To aid verification, it's worth going through the references to link to publications' first instances, instead of their second or third. Some examples:
3531:. Upon its release..." Is this a bit clearer? It's supported by ref 17, which references this statement in the "Sessions with Eno and Lanois" section.
623:
I know who The Edge is, and you know who The Edge is, but please pity the poor reader who doesn't know, and explain who he is. "U2 guitarist" will do.
92:
1034:
While I'm not a lover of all succession boxes either, I oppose removing these, because it breaks the chain. It has to be a project-wide decision at
3233:– Read the article from beginning to end, and I'm satisfied with most of what I saw, prose-wise. Did find a few minor issues, which I detail below:
292:
Explain to me how it is an inappropriate usage of the image, and how it fails the FAC criteria. It meets the guideline regarding Non-free images at
3852:
I've switched it all to past tense (I think), since a good chunk of it can be spoken of in that way. The only exceptions are the mentions of which
3820:
Can these two paragraphs be balanced out (or perhaps simply introduced by a summary sentence) to give the right overall impression from the start.
3519:
I've reworded it to the following: "Prior to the album's release, U2 announced that Eno's and Lanois's involvement, as well as the band's time in
735:
Nice opening, but does a band have a career? Perhaps that's just for musicians, but I'll stand corrected if I'm wrong. "since U2's inception in "?
75:
1836:
But U2 is part of the tour's full name; if we omit it from the section heading, then isn't that using an abbreviated name instead of the proper?
2706:
and this led to the correction of the italics, but every other detail then being excluded. Any suggestions about which is the right one to use?
1090:
I've done a check and delinked a lot of stuff, but you may want to give it another quick sweep and see if there's anything else that should go.
191:
Hello everyone. I am here today in the sincere hope that the old adage "third time is the charm" proves true. This is the third trip to FAC for
1822:
songs are included on the DVD, and what role they played in this show (a somewhat diminished one, as I read the song listing and sequencing).
145:
3507:
Nice, tight prose and a wealth of information combined to produce an engaging and comprehensive read. Thanks for addressing all my concerns.
30:
17:
3667:
Hmm, I'm not quite sure what to do with this one, since it's something that is still slated for the future and, I admit, is on the verge of
4009:
3963:
3933:
3866:
3837:
3792:
3764:
3718:
3681:
3652:
3623:
3586:
3564:. I think those were just leftovers from my last pass earlier in the FAC. I don't think there's much more that could be delinked; possibly
3541:
3484:
3429:
3385:
3335:
3308:
3280:
3253:
3154:
3124:
3022:
2991:
2951:
2910:
2875:
2822:
2791:
2756:
2716:
2661:
2597:
2546:
2480:
2449:
2412:
2327:
2300:
2265:
2226:
2199:
1987:
1952:
1888:
1867:
1846:
1802:
1770:
1734:
1703:
1668:
1633:
1590:
1553:
1539:
The most recent statistics I can find are an Associated Press report from October 2009 (one million copies); the only other I've seen is a
1529:
1460:
1331:
1310:
1270:
1228:
1193:
1162:
1131:
1100:
1063:
1009:
982:
943:
920:, due to the presence/absence of star ratings in the reviews. Ultimately, the infobox fails to summarise the critical opinion sufficiently.
896:
868:
813:
718:
685:
641:
586:
534:
483:
395:
314:
265:
225:
178:
4014:
3993:
3968:
3938:
3914:
3871:
3842:
3818:"McGuinness believed that the conditions of the music market were more responsible for the low sales than any decline in U2's popularity."
3797:
3769:
3743:
3723:
3703:
3686:
3657:
3628:
3591:
3546:
3489:
3465:
3434:
3414:
3390:
3375:
Oops, I think that happened when I shifted the paragraphs in the section around a couple of weeks ago. I've made the switch as suggested.
3360:
3340:
3313:
3285:
3258:
3224:
3201:
3172:
3159:
3129:
3108:
3091:
3078:
3027:
3009:
2996:
2956:
2915:
2880:
2827:
2796:
2761:
2721:
2666:
2602:
2551:
2485:
2454:
2417:
2369:
2332:
2305:
2270:
2231:
2204:
2113:
1992:
1971:
1957:
1935:
1918:
1893:
1872:
1851:
1831:
1807:
1775:
1739:
1708:
1673:
1638:
1595:
1558:
1534:
1465:
1392:
1336:
1315:
1275:
1251:
1233:
1198:
1167:
1136:
1105:
1068:
1048:
1029:
1014:
987:
948:
901:
873:
832:
818:
792:
723:
702:
690:
657:
646:
602:
591:
550:
539:
499:
488:
442:
414:
400:
379:
364:
349:
334:
319:
287:
270:
248:
230:
183:
631:
noted that the band were scrambling..."); is the next mention far enough down that a second introduction is needed, or is it fine as is?
2431:, isn't very useful for verifying that the song "Winter" appeared on the soundtrack. Is there anything better? If not, at least use the
2059:
1039:'distributed references' together. The maintainers just need to ensure that no album gets skipped, but they are pretty good at that.
457:"In July 2006, U2.com confirmed that the band were collaborating with producer Rick Rubin, in southern France and Abbey Road Studios"
3523:, Morocco, had resulted in a more experimental record than their previous two albums in an attempt to revisit the transition between
627:
The Edge is introduced as the guitarist earlier in the article, during the Eno/Lanois sessions section ("In November 2008, guitarist
1623:
I've removed it from "placing them third" on; hopefully that will solve the problem. One error does not an unreliable source make.
1354:
1242:
I think the Main article tags are unnecessary for the tour and Linear; just link their first instance in the prose of the section.—
761:
guideline. Did they note it inside their heads or in public? Not sure. "Observed" is no good, since it's a kind of subjective call.
3856:
songs are on the Tour DVD; I'm not sure whether to switch to the past tense here too, or if the current present tense is better.
1569:
This statement needs a source: "First-week sales in the United States were over 484,000, the band's second highest figures after
3012:
to use it as a source in a previous FAC for this very article, as apparently it has been used by the BBC and the UK Parliament.
150:
3902:
heading. I suspect you want it to appear in the TOC. As I say, I'll leave it with you to take any or no action on this point.
3419:
Good catch! I've gotten rid of that pesky "to". Thanks for taking the time to read and review the article, I appreciate it!
1613:
908:
Review infobox—can also go, because the format of the table is such that you have to include to less-prestigious sources (
3827:
opened with strong sales numbers, although these declined very quickly", though this probably needs a bit of polishing.
1345:
by Suhail Kanuga at Blender India (clearly different from the five star review that the American Blender gave it). And
2056:—uploaded with free CC licence from Flickr source; checked by Commons review bot and confirmed as tagged appropriately.
1035:
79:
1499:
finishes 32nd with 26 mentions out of some number of reviewers that I didn't quite see) and the results for singles
3096:
I switched to support above; all that remains are some minor points still in those hidden comments I left (renewed
1342:
3814:"By October 2009, sales had increased to just over one million copies, the group's lowest in more than a decade."
4005:
3959:
3929:
3862:
3833:
3788:
3760:
3714:
3677:
3648:
3619:
3582:
3537:
3480:
3425:
3381:
3331:
3304:
3276:
3249:
3197:
3150:
3120:
3018:
2987:
2947:
2906:
2871:
2818:
2787:
2752:
2712:
2657:
2593:
2542:
2476:
2445:
2408:
2323:
2296:
2261:
2222:
2195:
1983:
1948:
1884:
1863:
1842:
1798:
1766:
1730:
1699:
1664:
1629:
1586:
1549:
1525:
1456:
1327:
1306:
1266:
1224:
1189:
1158:
1127:
1096:
1059:
1005:
978:
939:
892:
864:
809:
758:
714:
681:
637:
582:
571:
Is it explained earlier in the article who Steve Lillywhite is? Producer? Musician? The curious reader wonders.
530:
479:
391:
360:
310:
261:
221:
174:
2781:
I have absolutely no idea. Another user stuck it in there for whatever reason when I wasn't looking. Removed.
1364:
3989:
3776:
Thanks for addressing my initial points. I've now read the whole article, and my remaining comments follow.
2365:
2109:
1914:
1827:
1388:
1044:
410:
2118:
Indeed, which is why I only suggested it might be useful for some of them. Like I say, not a deal breaker.
3243:
I think that "from" does make more sense and it sounds a bit better than to, so I've made the adjustment.
2041:
1967:
1931:
1450:). I think that is a fair breakdown given where the majority of reviews and music publications are based.
1409:
accordingly. I'm a little leery about adding in any others at the behest of major music publications like
668:
301:
236:
193:
71:
64:
2941:, this is impossible to avoid since other reliable sources simply don't cover the information mentioned.
966:. So unless you have sources that explicitly mention "the album sold copies", don't include that column.
2690:
2088:
929:
may be well known in America, but in the UK people will be much more likely to look at a source such as
298:
Cover art from various items, for identification only in the context of critical commentary of that item
2402:
Just the title of the article inside the magazine. It was incorrectly put in italics. I've fixed that.
3459:
3408:
3354:
3140:
2427:
330:
283:
244:
4000:
3954:
3924:
3857:
3828:
3783:
3755:
3709:
3672:
3643:
3614:
3577:
3532:
3475:
3420:
3376:
3326:
3299:
3271:
3244:
3217:
3193:
3145:
3115:
3013:
2982:
2942:
2901:
2866:
2836:
2813:
2782:
2747:
2730:
2707:
2652:
2588:
2581:
2537:
2514:
2471:
2440:
2403:
2318:
2291:
2256:
2217:
2190:
2047:
1978:
1943:
1879:
1858:
1837:
1793:
1761:
1725:
1694:
1659:
1624:
1581:
1544:
1520:
1451:
1322:
1301:
1261:
1219:
1184:
1153:
1122:
1091:
1054:
1025:
1000:
973:
934:
887:
859:
804:
768:
I haven't looked further than the lead. It's not bad, but probably needs an independent copy-edit.
709:
676:
632:
577:
525:
474:
386:
356:
305:
256:
216:
169:
2239:
Named ref "rs032309" (current no. 100) shows archiveurl error, and the original link redirects to
1785:
were they de-emphasized a bit? And maybe mention "Moment of Surrender"'s role as the show finale.
1689:
Added in viewpoints of Clayton and expanded that of Edge. In the process of looking for quotes by
972:
reception. I will remove the Sales thresholds though if you think that it's addition is mistaken.
561:"The band reworked it with Steve Lillywhite during a break in the recording with Eno and Lanois."
3985:
3923:
one, I figured Promotion probably has priority. I hope that this addresses all of your concerns!
3894:
a bolded heading (which would exclude it from the TOC), (b) add an initial subsection heading to
3708:
I think that works a bit better. Thanks. What do you think PL290? Is the wording less confusing?
2700:
2361:
2183:
2159:
2105:
2078:
1910:
1823:
1384:
1040:
772:
738:
406:
3642:
Yes, that's actually a much better wording! Thanks for the suggestion; I've implemented it now.
2961:
Fair enough. Subsequent reviewers might want to look at it, but it's not a deal-breaker for me.
3668:
3557:
3048:
2571:
2169:
2149:
1963:
1927:
1616:, that mentioned Jay-Z getting his 11th and passing Elvis Presley's 10 for most by a solo act.
1430:), one from Ireland ( RTE), one from Asia (MTV Asia), three from the United States (AllMusic,
1247:
375:
345:
846:
There are an overwhelming number of (sometimes complex) tables and infoboxes in this article:
2567:
It is a video, but I'm unsure of what you mean by "say outright". Do you mean a switch from
1488:
613:""Get on Your Boots" stemmed from a guitar riff The Edge created and recorded at his home."
439:
3812:
But suddenly the next sentence, which ends the paragraph, surprisingly and blandly states,
3910:
3739:
3452:
3401:
3347:
2053:
787:
326:
279:
240:
2618:
1580:
I'll do a search, but as far as I'm aware Reuters is considered to be a reliable source.
1346:
3211:
1379:
1021:
776:
293:
3321:
Formats: Some hyphens would be useful here in areas with "## page", such as "24 page".
3398:"had become well-known to the public from to its use in iPod commercials." Drop "to".
2932:
link that's used to confirm the band streamed one of their concerts over the service.
1609:
1500:
1484:
958:
Charts—Fine, but two things—what year did the singles chart? And certifications does
697:
652:
597:
545:
494:
53:
1492:
1373:
for another one from the home country. And even ones without star ratings, such as
3573:
2587:? If so, the title will then be in italics (which you noted concerns about above).
1374:
1243:
371:
341:
304:. So tell me: how is the use inappropriate, and how does it fail the FAC criteria?
3602:
section, so some context is needed here for the second sentence to be meaningful.
2439:
How about the list of nominations and winners? I've substituted the ref for that.
2216:
My error on that; I copy-pasted the entire citation instead of just the ref name.
1121:
Linked Jewish and Hindu music. No article exists on Sufi singing that I can find.
1083:
Ovelinking—street sign, stadium, set designer, limited editions. Audit throughout.
109:
1114:
Stuff that should be linked, if possible—Jewish music, Hindu music, Sufi singing.
3561:
2290:
I think I've gotten all of these now. Looks like there were only three of them.
1647:
I'd double check the assertion about #1's ranking on the UK Album Chart as well.
1369:
340:
generally? I'd say it's fair to assume there's broad acceptance on their use. --
2888:
Current ref no. 94, "The Best Albums of 2009": probably no need to include the
2317:
That was the result of using the wrong parameter. I've corrected my oversight.
1218:
the article and changed quite a few of "the band"s into "the group"s or "U2"s.
3950:
3906:
3735:
3696:
3565:
3165:
3101:
3084:
3071:
3056:
3033:
2962:
2843:
2737:
2642:
2527:
2398:, 2009-02-23": what is it? A special edition of the magazine? A separate book?
2376:
2129:
2119:
2025:
2006:
1717:
Are there any metrics for how much radio airplay the songs from the album got?
1359:
825:
780:
207:
2466:. NRJ. Canal+. 2009-02-23": what is it? A radio interview? Magazine pull out?
3782:"It" refers to the pattern of drum beats. I've altered "it" to "the beats".
2499:
2313:
Current ref no. 8, "Calder, Simon (2007-11-10)": has no publication details.
858:
I've removed this per your suggestion and placed the locations in the text.
708:
Thanks for your comments thus far, and for getting back to them so quickly!
405:
Another voice in support of fair use of album covers for album articles.
3136:
1353:, based in Singapore and presumably different from any MTV U.S. review.
1350:
628:
3450:– After the fixes, I think this is there. Quite a nice article overall.
2633:
Obviously, I can't access it, so I don't know who's in it, so tweak the
2062:—claimed free CC licence by uploader/photographer; tagged appropriately.
2050:—claimed free CC licence by uploader/photographer; tagged appropriately.
2024:: All subsequent strikes here were from me at 08:25, 12 May 2010 (UTC),
510:"An interview with Q revealed that will.i.am had worked with the band "
3816:
We then have a large paragraph about disappointing sales, ending with,
3505:
I have not yet read the whole article, but what I've read is very good.
2929:
2612:
2503:
2014:
Leaning support, pending resolution of source questions/issues (below).
3671:
depending on what alterations are made. Do you have any suggestions?
3345:
A couple have unneeded spaces, but I'll get them when I'm done here.
1909:
I haven't looked much at the other sections, but this is something.
1383:
in Israel, can be used in the text discussion of critical reaction.
671:, appears to be correctly licenced, with appropriate FU rationale.
39:
Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in
1145:"Deupree blasted the band"—I doubt blasted is formal language here.
1292:
article, the stars graphics (or their equivalent) are easy to see.
2889:
2494:
Bono; Edge, The; Clayton, Adam; Mullen Jr, Larry (2009-02-23).
3569:
3520:
2611:
Bono; The Edge; Clayton, Adam; Mullen Jr, Larry (2009-11-27).
2252:
1483:
Another review aggregation effort with a long history is the
202:
129:
Featured article candidates/No Line on the Horizon/archive3
124:
Featured article candidates/No Line on the Horizon/archive2
119:
Featured article candidates/No Line on the Horizon/archive1
3808:, we're initially given the impression of terrific sales:
912:) at the expense of highly respected publications such as
2976:
Are we happy with radioandmusic.com as a reliable source?
2812:
A television program in France. How should I specify it?
1207:
Replace a few of the "band"s with "group" to add variety.
155:
3692:
3097:
2981:
switched out the Italy field in the charts for Mexico.
2155:
template should not be used in the same article as the
1215:
799:
748:", but" twice in two sentences (one without the comma).
105:
101:
97:
57:
3605:
I think that's a byproduct from when that sentence in
3898:(if there is a meaningful one), or (c) just drop the
3051:
issue already raised by Brian; will await a response.
2094:
templates render the references means that where the
1942:
were reinstated. The subscription link is now noted.
1176:
Add a descriptor to Midem. I didn't know what it was.
764:
How about a comma instead of "titled". Same later on.
962:
equate no of copies sold. It indicates no of copies
2099:
the way, just a suggestion to make it more uniform.
1515:only source I know of is mediatraffic.de, but that
775:, they're a little jittery about 30 s sound-bites (
370:
There might be a relevant project page to do so. --
3055:On second thoughts, it doesn't bother me one jot.
751:"The band had planned"—rhyming jingle. "intended"?
4024:The above discussion is preserved as an archive.
2736:in the same manner as the two suggestions above?
2435:parameter to indicate "end credits" or something.
886:Converted, though my prose may not be brilliant.
3823:I've introduced a summary sentence which reads "
1573:." (And not that Reuters story, see next item.)
2857:Current ref no. 85, "Certificados U2": link to
2637:parameter accordingly (and that "Video" in the
2019:All that remain from me are sourcing questions.
43:. No further edits should be made to this page.
3553:Perhaps some overlinking (noticed "birdsong")
2859:Associação Brasileira dos Produtores de Discos
4030:No further edits should be made to this page.
29:The following is an archived discussion of a
8:
2470:A radio interview. How should I specify it?
2286:should be italicised. Some are, some aren't.
1491:. You can find the 2009 results for albums
1480:Same for the text, very U.S. and UK centric.
3984:was lame - but can't fault the WP article!
3239:previous few releases." Which should it be?
3004:What makes everyhit.com a reliable source?
2392:The Superleague of Extraordinary Gentlemen
1152:Altered to "Deupree called the cover...".
134:
41:Knowledge talk:Featured article candidates
1543:article from September (991,000 copies).
2726:For output consistency, perhaps go with
2630:Note: Subscription required for access.
925:I'm a little leery about removing this.
798:Thanks for your comments thus far; I've
300:". Critical commentary on the cover art
278:- Inappropriate use of non free content
3298:Good point; I've removed that linkage.
3270:Comma removed; thanks for spotting it!
2212:Duplicate cite, named ref "StarReview".
137:
116:
3474:Thank you very much for your support!
2896:, especially as you haven't elsewhere.
2777:": why is there a template in there?
2773:Current ref no. 51, "Download 'No Line
2682:": not sure that should be italicised.
438:—no dab links or dead external links.
2641:parameter is just a suggestion too).
2255:is currently undergoing maintenance.
1604:The second part of this statement is
1438:) and three from the United Kingdom (
651:I've clarified that he plays for U2.
18:Knowledge:Featured article candidates
7:
1610:Billboard 200#Most number-one albums
1422:There's now one review from Canada (
3083:Struck some and left some replies.
2278:Newspaper and magazine names, e.g.
2128:Struck this as a preference thing.
2060:File:U2 360 tour stage Zagreb 2.JPG
754:re-scheduled has a hyphen? Unsure.
24:
206:some copyediting (many thanks to
3576:, but I'm not sure about those.
3139:, who has done a ton of work on
2937:Clayton, and the development of
2680:Absolute Radio interview with U2
2510:That was achieved by use of the
493:Not much you can do here, then.
3509:Some specific comments so far:
2617:(Video). U2.com. Archived from
2498:(Radio broadcast) (in French).
2251:a second check) is because the
1571:How to Dismantle an Atomic Bomb
1397:I've added in the MTV Asia and
276:Fails Featured article criteria
1503:(a scattering of U2 mentions).
596:I didn't notice that. Struck.
1:
3010:I was specifically instructed
2425:Current ref no. 27, the film
757:"many noted"—ah, see our new
696:More later, as I have time.
3949:*Note: I've left a note on
3164:Indeed it does. Nice work.
2496:Exclusive interview with U2
2464:Exclusive interview with U2
2179:Both instances switched to
2175:, etc. family of templates.
1355:Here is a 3 1/2 star review
31:featured article nomination
4047:
3639:the film originated ..."?
2614:Long, Drawn Out Confession
933:when looking for reviews.
212:continual assistance to me
3100:). Otherwise, nice work.
2520:template, formatted thus:
1367:by Kevin Courtney of the
741:: "producer" (which is a
201:Bono and the rest of the
4027:Please do not modify it.
4015:13:45, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
3994:03:47, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
3969:02:13, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
3939:23:48, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
3915:17:23, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
3872:23:40, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
3843:23:37, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
3798:23:37, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
3770:04:40, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
3744:21:45, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
3724:12:38, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
3704:10:44, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
3687:04:18, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
3658:04:18, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
3629:04:18, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
3592:04:35, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
3547:04:09, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
3490:00:35, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
3466:00:18, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
3435:03:54, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
3415:00:34, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
3391:03:54, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
3361:00:18, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
3341:03:54, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
3314:03:54, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
3286:03:54, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
3259:03:54, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
3225:19:56, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
3202:13:01, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
3173:20:23, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
3160:00:09, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
3130:04:02, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
3109:22:33, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
3092:08:25, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
3079:10:09, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
3028:16:28, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
2997:16:59, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
2957:03:09, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
2916:03:09, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
2881:03:09, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
2828:18:36, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
2797:18:36, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
2762:16:42, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
2722:18:36, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
2667:16:42, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
2603:23:05, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
2552:16:42, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
2486:18:36, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
2455:01:10, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
2418:18:41, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
2370:10:41, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
2333:18:41, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
2306:23:20, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
2271:17:13, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
2232:16:28, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
2205:23:20, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
2114:10:41, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
1993:20:21, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
1972:20:16, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
1958:16:29, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
1936:08:56, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
1894:04:05, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
1873:03:26, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
1693:and industry observers.
1401:reviews and removed the
1357:by Cameron Adams of the
36:Please do not modify it.
2808:": what is it? A video?
1919:11:56, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
1852:13:33, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
1832:13:04, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
1808:12:24, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
1776:12:38, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
1740:12:24, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
1709:13:30, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
1674:13:30, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
1639:12:53, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
1596:13:18, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
1559:13:54, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
1535:12:34, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
1519:considered unreliable.
1466:04:19, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
1426:), one from Australia (
1393:01:27, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
1343:here is a 3 star review
1337:15:27, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
1316:16:46, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
1276:19:12, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
1252:16:14, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
1234:11:47, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
1199:14:04, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
1168:19:12, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
1137:18:48, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
1106:19:12, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
1069:11:28, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
1049:11:09, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
1030:12:09, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
1015:14:04, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
988:14:01, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
949:19:12, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
902:14:51, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
874:14:01, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
833:17:54, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
819:16:20, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
793:12:54, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
745:from his name, anyway).
724:04:44, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
703:01:13, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
691:04:11, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
658:04:23, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
647:04:11, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
603:04:23, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
592:04:11, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
551:04:23, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
540:04:11, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
500:04:23, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
489:04:04, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
443:11:02, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
415:11:01, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
401:04:04, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
380:02:33, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
365:02:28, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
350:22:59, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
335:16:50, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
320:15:30, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
288:14:25, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
271:13:26, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
249:08:30, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
231:04:21, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
215:topic at hand. Cheers,
197:, an album released by
184:04:21, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
3825:No Line on the Horizon
2632:
2525:
2509:
2042:File:NoLineU2Promo.jpg
1924:Comment on referencing
1365:Here's a 4 star review
1349:by Madeleine Chong of
699:Firsfron of Ronchester
669:File:NoLineU2Promo.jpg
654:Firsfron of Ronchester
599:Firsfron of Ronchester
547:Firsfron of Ronchester
496:Firsfron of Ronchester
237:File:NoLineU2Promo.jpg
194:No Line on the Horizon
72:No Line on the Horizon
65:No Line on the Horizon
2804:Current ref no. 54, "
2678:Current ref no. 42, "
2608:
2521:
2491:
2462:Current ref no. 29, "
2390:Current ref no. 24, "
1724:None that I've seen.
1347:here is a 7/10 review
235:What is the point of
3882:section, you have a
2253:Web Citation Archive
1403:Entertainment Weekly
1036:WP:WikiProject Music
3982:Moment of Surrender
2356:. There are others.
2048:File:Riad Fez 1.JPG
667:The sole FU image,
56:21:31, 1 June 2010
3047:No comment on the
2280:The New York Times
1487:poll, long run by
927:The New York Times
918:The New York Times
4013:
3999:Born" a shot? =P
3971:
3967:
3937:
3870:
3841:
3796:
3768:
3722:
3685:
3656:
3627:
3590:
3558:bird vocalization
3545:
3488:
3433:
3389:
3339:
3312:
3284:
3257:
3158:
3128:
3026:
2995:
2955:
2914:
2879:
2826:
2795:
2760:
2720:
2665:
2651:Changed as well.
2601:
2550:
2484:
2453:
2416:
2331:
2304:
2269:
2230:
2203:
1991:
1956:
1892:
1871:
1850:
1806:
1774:
1738:
1707:
1672:
1637:
1594:
1557:
1533:
1464:
1335:
1314:
1274:
1232:
1197:
1166:
1135:
1104:
1067:
1013:
986:
947:
900:
872:
817:
759:WP:Words to avoid
722:
689:
645:
590:
538:
487:
399:
318:
269:
229:
187:
182:
163:
162:
4038:
4029:
4003:
3957:
3948:
3927:
3860:
3831:
3786:
3758:
3712:
3701:
3675:
3646:
3617:
3580:
3535:
3478:
3462:
3455:
3423:
3411:
3404:
3379:
3357:
3350:
3329:
3302:
3274:
3247:
3222:
3214:
3170:
3148:
3118:
3106:
3089:
3076:
3061:
3038:
3016:
2985:
2967:
2945:
2904:
2869:
2848:
2841:
2835:
2816:
2806:Le Grand Journal
2785:
2776:
2750:
2742:
2735:
2729:
2710:
2705:
2699:
2695:
2689:
2655:
2647:
2640:
2636:
2629:
2627:
2626:
2591:
2586:
2580:
2576:
2570:
2540:
2532:
2519:
2513:
2507:
2474:
2443:
2434:
2406:
2381:
2321:
2294:
2259:
2245:
2220:
2193:
2188:
2182:
2174:
2168:
2164:
2158:
2154:
2148:
2134:
2124:
2097:
2093:
2087:
2083:
2077:
2030:
2011:
1981:
1946:
1882:
1861:
1840:
1796:
1764:
1728:
1697:
1662:
1627:
1584:
1547:
1523:
1489:Robert Christgau
1454:
1325:
1304:
1264:
1222:
1187:
1156:
1125:
1094:
1057:
1003:
976:
937:
890:
862:
830:
807:
790:
785:
773:the constabulary
712:
700:
679:
655:
635:
600:
580:
548:
528:
497:
477:
389:
308:
259:
219:
172:
166:
135:
113:
95:
48:The article was
38:
4046:
4045:
4041:
4040:
4039:
4037:
4036:
4035:
4034:
4025:
3884:lone subsection
3697:
3525:The Joshua Tree
3461:27 and counting
3460:
3453:
3410:27 and counting
3409:
3402:
3356:27 and counting
3355:
3348:
3218:
3212:
3166:
3102:
3085:
3072:
3057:
3034:
2963:
2844:
2839:
2833:
2774:
2738:
2733:
2727:
2703:
2697:
2693:
2687:
2643:
2638:
2634:
2624:
2622:
2610:
2584:
2578:
2574:
2568:
2528:
2517:
2511:
2493:
2432:
2377:
2243:
2186:
2180:
2172:
2166:
2162:
2156:
2152:
2146:
2130:
2120:
2095:
2091:
2085:
2081:
2075:
2054:File:U2 Way.jpg
2026:
2007:
1363:in Australia.
826:
788:
781:
698:
653:
598:
546:
495:
133:
86:
70:
68:
34:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
4044:
4042:
4033:
4032:
4020:
4019:
4018:
4017:
3944:
3943:
3942:
3941:
3904:
3903:
3876:
3875:
3874:
3847:
3846:
3845:
3802:
3801:
3800:
3774:
3773:
3733:
3732:
3731:
3730:
3729:
3728:
3727:
3726:
3662:
3661:
3660:
3633:
3632:
3631:
3596:
3595:
3594:
3551:
3550:
3549:
3495:
3494:
3493:
3492:
3471:
3470:
3469:
3468:
3440:
3439:
3438:
3437:
3395:
3394:
3393:
3367:
3366:
3365:
3364:
3363:
3318:
3317:
3316:
3290:
3289:
3288:
3263:
3262:
3261:
3228:
3227:
3204:
3194:Y2kcrazyjoker4
3186:
3185:
3184:
3183:
3182:
3181:
3180:
3179:
3178:
3177:
3176:
3175:
3067:
3066:
3065:
3064:
3063:
3044:
3043:
3042:
3041:
3040:
3001:
3000:
2999:
2973:
2972:
2971:
2970:
2969:
2920:
2919:
2918:
2885:
2884:
2883:
2854:
2853:
2852:
2851:
2850:
2801:
2800:
2799:
2770:
2769:
2768:
2767:
2766:
2765:
2764:
2746:Also changed.
2675:
2674:
2673:
2672:
2671:
2670:
2669:
2560:
2559:
2558:
2557:
2556:
2555:
2554:
2459:
2458:
2457:
2422:
2421:
2420:
2387:
2386:
2385:
2384:
2383:
2337:
2336:
2335:
2310:
2309:
2308:
2275:
2274:
2273:
2236:
2235:
2234:
2209:
2208:
2207:
2142:
2141:
2140:
2139:
2138:
2137:
2136:
2065:
2064:
2063:
2057:
2051:
2045:
2000:
1999:
1998:
1997:
1996:
1995:
1907:
1906:
1905:
1904:
1903:
1902:
1901:
1900:
1899:
1898:
1897:
1896:
1787:
1786:
1781:
1780:
1779:
1778:
1755:
1754:
1745:
1744:
1743:
1742:
1719:
1718:
1714:
1713:
1712:
1711:
1684:
1683:
1679:
1678:
1677:
1676:
1653:
1652:
1648:
1644:
1643:
1642:
1641:
1618:
1617:
1614:Billboard here
1601:
1600:
1599:
1598:
1575:
1574:
1566:
1565:
1564:
1563:
1562:
1561:
1509:
1508:
1504:
1485:Pazz & Jop
1481:
1477:
1476:
1475:
1474:
1473:
1472:
1471:
1470:
1469:
1468:
1380:Jerusalem Post
1294:
1293:
1288:
1287:
1285:
1281:
1280:
1279:
1278:
1262:MelicansMatkin
1255:
1254:
1239:
1238:
1237:
1236:
1209:
1208:
1204:
1203:
1202:
1201:
1185:MelicansMatkin
1178:
1177:
1173:
1172:
1171:
1170:
1154:MelicansMatkin
1147:
1146:
1142:
1141:
1140:
1139:
1123:MelicansMatkin
1116:
1115:
1111:
1110:
1109:
1108:
1092:MelicansMatkin
1085:
1084:
1080:
1079:
1078:
1077:
1076:
1075:
1074:
1073:
1072:
1071:
1001:MelicansMatkin
996:
995:
991:
990:
974:MelicansMatkin
968:
967:
956:
952:
951:
935:MelicansMatkin
922:
921:
905:
904:
888:MelicansMatkin
883:
882:
877:
876:
860:MelicansMatkin
855:
854:
848:
847:
843:
842:
838:
837:
836:
835:
805:MelicansMatkin
766:
765:
762:
755:
752:
749:
746:
736:
727:
726:
710:MelicansMatkin
694:
693:
677:MelicansMatkin
665:
664:
663:
662:
661:
660:
633:MelicansMatkin
610:
609:
608:
607:
606:
605:
578:MelicansMatkin
558:
557:
556:
555:
554:
553:
526:MelicansMatkin
507:
506:
505:
504:
503:
502:
475:MelicansMatkin
454:
453:
446:
445:
432:
431:
430:
429:
428:
427:
426:
425:
424:
423:
422:
421:
420:
419:
418:
417:
387:MelicansMatkin
357:Y2kcrazyjoker4
352:
306:MelicansMatkin
257:MelicansMatkin
217:MelicansMatkin
189:
188:
170:MelicansMatkin
168:Nominator(s):
161:
160:
159:
158:
156:External links
153:
148:
140:
139:
132:
131:
126:
121:
115:
67:
62:
61:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
4043:
4031:
4028:
4022:
4021:
4016:
4011:
4010:contributions
4007:
4002:
3997:
3996:
3995:
3991:
3987:
3986:hamiltonstone
3983:
3978:
3975:
3974:
3973:
3972:
3970:
3965:
3964:contributions
3961:
3956:
3952:
3945:
3940:
3935:
3934:contributions
3931:
3926:
3921:
3920:
3919:
3918:
3917:
3916:
3912:
3908:
3901:
3897:
3893:
3889:
3885:
3881:
3877:
3873:
3868:
3867:contributions
3864:
3859:
3855:
3851:
3850:
3848:
3844:
3839:
3838:contributions
3835:
3830:
3826:
3822:
3821:
3819:
3815:
3811:
3807:
3803:
3799:
3794:
3793:contributions
3790:
3785:
3781:
3780:
3778:
3777:
3772:
3771:
3766:
3765:contributions
3762:
3757:
3751:
3750:
3748:
3747:
3746:
3745:
3741:
3737:
3725:
3720:
3719:contributions
3716:
3711:
3707:
3706:
3705:
3702:
3700:
3695:work better?
3694:
3690:
3689:
3688:
3683:
3682:contributions
3679:
3674:
3670:
3666:
3665:
3663:
3659:
3654:
3653:contributions
3650:
3645:
3641:
3640:
3638:
3634:
3630:
3625:
3624:contributions
3621:
3616:
3612:
3608:
3604:
3603:
3601:
3597:
3593:
3588:
3587:contributions
3584:
3579:
3575:
3571:
3567:
3563:
3559:
3555:
3554:
3552:
3548:
3543:
3542:contributions
3539:
3534:
3530:
3526:
3522:
3518:
3517:
3514:
3513:
3511:
3510:
3506:
3502:
3500:
3491:
3486:
3485:contributions
3482:
3477:
3473:
3472:
3467:
3463:
3457:
3456:
3449:
3446:
3445:
3444:
3443:
3442:
3441:
3436:
3431:
3430:contributions
3427:
3422:
3418:
3417:
3416:
3412:
3406:
3405:
3399:
3396:
3392:
3387:
3386:contributions
3383:
3378:
3374:
3373:
3372:
3368:
3362:
3358:
3352:
3351:
3344:
3343:
3342:
3337:
3336:contributions
3333:
3328:
3324:
3323:
3322:
3319:
3315:
3310:
3309:contributions
3306:
3301:
3297:
3296:
3295:
3291:
3287:
3282:
3281:contributions
3278:
3273:
3269:
3268:
3267:
3264:
3260:
3255:
3254:contributions
3251:
3246:
3242:
3241:
3240:
3236:
3235:
3234:
3232:
3226:
3223:
3221:
3216:
3215:
3208:
3205:
3203:
3199:
3195:
3191:
3188:
3187:
3174:
3171:
3169:
3163:
3162:
3161:
3156:
3155:contributions
3152:
3147:
3142:
3141:WP:GOODCHARTS
3138:
3133:
3132:
3131:
3126:
3125:contributions
3122:
3117:
3112:
3111:
3110:
3107:
3105:
3099:
3095:
3094:
3093:
3090:
3088:
3082:
3081:
3080:
3077:
3075:
3068:
3062:
3060:
3054:
3053:
3052:
3050:
3045:
3039:
3037:
3031:
3030:
3029:
3024:
3023:contributions
3020:
3015:
3011:
3007:
3006:
3005:
3002:
2998:
2993:
2992:contributions
2989:
2984:
2979:
2978:
2977:
2974:
2968:
2966:
2960:
2959:
2958:
2953:
2952:contributions
2949:
2944:
2940:
2935:
2934:
2933:
2931:
2926:
2923:You've got a
2921:
2917:
2912:
2911:contributions
2908:
2903:
2899:
2898:
2897:
2895:
2894:Rolling Stone
2891:
2886:
2882:
2877:
2876:contributions
2873:
2868:
2864:
2863:
2862:
2860:
2855:
2849:
2847:
2838:
2831:
2830:
2829:
2824:
2823:contributions
2820:
2815:
2811:
2810:
2809:
2807:
2802:
2798:
2793:
2792:contributions
2789:
2784:
2780:
2779:
2778:
2771:
2763:
2758:
2757:contributions
2754:
2749:
2745:
2744:
2743:
2741:
2732:
2725:
2724:
2723:
2718:
2717:contributions
2714:
2709:
2702:
2692:
2685:
2684:
2683:
2681:
2676:
2668:
2663:
2662:contributions
2659:
2654:
2650:
2649:
2648:
2646:
2631:
2621:on 2009-12-05
2620:
2616:
2615:
2606:
2605:
2604:
2599:
2598:contributions
2595:
2590:
2583:
2573:
2566:
2565:
2564:
2561:
2553:
2548:
2547:contributions
2544:
2539:
2535:
2534:
2533:
2531:
2524:
2516:
2508:
2505:
2501:
2497:
2489:
2488:
2487:
2482:
2481:contributions
2478:
2473:
2469:
2468:
2467:
2465:
2460:
2456:
2451:
2450:contributions
2447:
2442:
2438:
2437:
2436:
2430:
2429:
2423:
2419:
2414:
2413:contributions
2410:
2405:
2401:
2400:
2399:
2397:
2393:
2388:
2382:
2380:
2373:
2372:
2371:
2367:
2363:
2362:Wasted Time R
2359:
2358:
2357:
2355:
2351:
2347:
2346:National Post
2343:
2338:
2334:
2329:
2328:contributions
2325:
2320:
2316:
2315:
2314:
2311:
2307:
2302:
2301:contributions
2298:
2293:
2289:
2288:
2287:
2285:
2281:
2276:
2272:
2267:
2266:contributions
2263:
2258:
2254:
2249:
2248:
2247:
2242:
2241:Rolling Stone
2237:
2233:
2228:
2227:contributions
2224:
2219:
2215:
2214:
2213:
2210:
2206:
2201:
2200:contributions
2197:
2192:
2185:
2178:
2177:
2176:
2171:
2161:
2151:
2143:
2135:
2133:
2127:
2126:
2125:
2123:
2117:
2116:
2115:
2111:
2107:
2106:Wasted Time R
2102:
2101:
2100:
2090:
2080:
2072:
2071:
2069:
2068:Source review
2066:
2061:
2058:
2055:
2052:
2049:
2046:
2043:
2040:
2039:
2037:
2034:
2033:
2032:
2031:
2029:
2023:
2020:
2015:
2012:
2010:
2004:
1994:
1989:
1988:contributions
1985:
1980:
1975:
1974:
1973:
1969:
1965:
1961:
1960:
1959:
1954:
1953:contributions
1950:
1945:
1940:
1939:
1938:
1937:
1933:
1929:
1925:
1921:
1920:
1916:
1912:
1911:Wasted Time R
1895:
1890:
1889:contributions
1886:
1881:
1876:
1875:
1874:
1869:
1868:contributions
1865:
1860:
1855:
1854:
1853:
1848:
1847:contributions
1844:
1839:
1835:
1834:
1833:
1829:
1825:
1824:Wasted Time R
1821:
1816:
1811:
1810:
1809:
1804:
1803:contributions
1800:
1795:
1791:
1790:
1789:
1788:
1783:
1782:
1777:
1772:
1771:contributions
1768:
1763:
1759:
1758:
1757:
1756:
1752:
1747:
1746:
1741:
1736:
1735:contributions
1732:
1727:
1723:
1722:
1721:
1720:
1716:
1715:
1710:
1705:
1704:contributions
1701:
1696:
1692:
1688:
1687:
1686:
1685:
1681:
1680:
1675:
1670:
1669:contributions
1666:
1661:
1657:
1656:
1655:
1654:
1649:
1646:
1645:
1640:
1635:
1634:contributions
1631:
1626:
1622:
1621:
1620:
1619:
1615:
1611:
1607:
1603:
1602:
1597:
1592:
1591:contributions
1588:
1583:
1579:
1578:
1577:
1576:
1572:
1568:
1567:
1560:
1555:
1554:contributions
1551:
1546:
1542:
1538:
1537:
1536:
1531:
1530:contributions
1527:
1522:
1518:
1513:
1512:
1511:
1510:
1505:
1502:
1498:
1494:
1490:
1486:
1482:
1479:
1478:
1467:
1462:
1461:contributions
1458:
1453:
1449:
1445:
1441:
1437:
1436:Rolling Stone
1433:
1429:
1425:
1420:
1416:
1412:
1411:Rolling Stone
1408:
1404:
1400:
1396:
1395:
1394:
1390:
1386:
1385:Wasted Time R
1382:
1381:
1376:
1372:
1371:
1366:
1362:
1361:
1356:
1352:
1348:
1344:
1340:
1339:
1338:
1333:
1332:contributions
1329:
1324:
1319:
1318:
1317:
1312:
1311:contributions
1308:
1303:
1298:
1297:
1296:
1295:
1290:
1289:
1286:
1283:
1282:
1277:
1272:
1271:contributions
1268:
1263:
1259:
1258:
1257:
1256:
1253:
1249:
1245:
1241:
1240:
1235:
1230:
1229:contributions
1226:
1221:
1217:
1213:
1212:
1211:
1210:
1206:
1205:
1200:
1195:
1194:contributions
1191:
1186:
1182:
1181:
1180:
1179:
1175:
1174:
1169:
1164:
1163:contributions
1160:
1155:
1151:
1150:
1149:
1148:
1144:
1143:
1138:
1133:
1132:contributions
1129:
1124:
1120:
1119:
1118:
1117:
1113:
1112:
1107:
1102:
1101:contributions
1098:
1093:
1089:
1088:
1087:
1086:
1082:
1081:
1070:
1065:
1064:contributions
1061:
1056:
1052:
1051:
1050:
1046:
1042:
1041:Wasted Time R
1037:
1033:
1032:
1031:
1027:
1023:
1018:
1017:
1016:
1011:
1010:contributions
1007:
1002:
998:
997:
993:
992:
989:
984:
983:contributions
980:
975:
970:
969:
965:
961:
957:
954:
953:
950:
945:
944:contributions
941:
936:
932:
928:
924:
923:
919:
915:
911:
907:
906:
903:
898:
897:contributions
894:
889:
885:
884:
879:
878:
875:
870:
869:contributions
866:
861:
857:
856:
852:
851:
850:
849:
845:
844:
840:
839:
834:
831:
829:
822:
821:
820:
815:
814:contributions
811:
806:
801:
797:
796:
795:
794:
791:
786:
784:
778:
774:
769:
763:
760:
756:
753:
750:
747:
744:
740:
737:
734:
733:
732:
731:
725:
720:
719:contributions
716:
711:
707:
706:
705:
704:
701:
692:
687:
686:contributions
683:
678:
674:
673:
672:
670:
659:
656:
650:
649:
648:
643:
642:contributions
639:
634:
630:
626:
625:
624:
621:
620:
618:
617:
615:
614:
604:
601:
595:
594:
593:
588:
587:contributions
584:
579:
574:
573:
572:
569:
568:
566:
565:
563:
562:
552:
549:
543:
542:
541:
536:
535:contributions
532:
527:
523:
522:
521:
518:
517:
515:
514:
512:
511:
501:
498:
492:
491:
490:
485:
484:contributions
481:
476:
471:
470:
469:
465:
464:
462:
461:
459:
458:
451:
448:
447:
444:
441:
437:
434:
433:
416:
412:
408:
407:Wasted Time R
404:
403:
402:
397:
396:contributions
393:
388:
383:
382:
381:
377:
373:
368:
367:
366:
362:
358:
353:
351:
347:
343:
338:
337:
336:
332:
328:
323:
322:
321:
316:
315:contributions
312:
307:
303:
299:
295:
291:
290:
289:
285:
281:
277:
274:
273:
272:
267:
266:contributions
263:
258:
253:
252:
251:
250:
246:
242:
238:
233:
232:
227:
226:contributions
223:
218:
213:
209:
204:
200:
196:
195:
186:
185:
180:
179:contributions
176:
171:
165:
164:
157:
154:
152:
149:
147:
144:
143:
142:
141:
136:
130:
127:
125:
122:
120:
117:
114:
111:
107:
103:
99:
94:
90:
85:
81:
77:
73:
66:
63:
60:
58:
55:
51:
44:
42:
37:
32:
27:
26:
19:
4026:
4023:
3981:
3976:
3947:
3946:
3905:
3899:
3895:
3891:
3887:
3879:
3853:
3824:
3817:
3813:
3809:
3805:
3775:
3752:
3749:
3734:
3698:
3636:
3610:
3606:
3599:
3574:iTunes Store
3529:Achtung Baby
3528:
3524:
3512:
3508:
3504:
3498:
3497:
3496:
3451:
3447:
3400:
3397:
3369:
3346:
3320:
3292:
3265:
3237:
3230:
3229:
3219:
3210:
3206:
3189:
3167:
3103:
3086:
3073:
3058:
3046:
3035:
3003:
2975:
2964:
2938:
2924:
2922:
2893:
2887:
2856:
2845:
2805:
2803:
2772:
2739:
2691:cite episode
2679:
2677:
2644:
2623:. Retrieved
2619:the original
2613:
2609:
2562:
2536:So changed.
2529:
2522:
2495:
2492:
2490:Perhaps try:
2463:
2461:
2426:
2424:
2395:
2391:
2389:
2378:
2353:
2349:
2345:
2341:
2339:
2312:
2283:
2279:
2277:
2240:
2238:
2211:
2144:
2131:
2121:
2089:cite journal
2074:The way the
2073:
2067:
2036:Image review
2035:
2027:
2021:
2018:
2013:
2008:
2002:
2001:
1964:Brianboulton
1928:Brianboulton
1923:
1922:
1908:
1819:
1814:
1750:
1690:
1605:
1570:
1540:
1516:
1496:
1447:
1443:
1439:
1435:
1431:
1427:
1424:Toronto Star
1423:
1418:
1414:
1410:
1407:The Guardian
1406:
1402:
1398:
1378:
1368:
1358:
963:
959:
930:
926:
917:
913:
910:Blender, RTE
909:
827:
800:made changes
782:
770:
767:
742:
729:
728:
695:
666:
622:
619:
616:
612:
611:
570:
567:
564:
560:
559:
519:
516:
513:
509:
508:
466:
463:
460:
456:
455:
449:
435:
297:
275:
234:
198:
192:
190:
167:
151:Citation bot
69:
49:
47:
35:
28:
3878:Within the
3607:Composition
3600:Composition
3562:equals sign
2246:s homepage.
1749:always the
1606:not correct
1375:this review
1370:Irish Times
771:PS Over at
739:WP:OVERLINK
3669:WP:CRYSTAL
3566:Amazon.com
3499:Leaning to
3454:Giants2008
3403:Giants2008
3349:Giants2008
2837:cite video
2731:cite video
2625:2009-12-05
2582:cite video
2515:cite video
1691:McGuinness
1428:Herald Sun
1399:Herald Sun
1360:Herald Sun
743:chain-link
524:So added.
327:Fasach Nua
302:is present
280:Fasach Nua
241:Fasach Nua
3896:Promotion
3880:Promotion
3806:Reception
3556:Delinked
2900:Removed.
2701:cite news
2342:Hot Press
2284:Billboard
2184:cite news
2160:cite news
2079:cite news
1760:Altered.
1541:Billboard
1507:quickly).
1377:from the
1260:Removed.
1022:bodnotbod
999:Removed.
777:WP:NFCC#2
730:Comments:
4001:Melicans
3955:Melicans
3925:Melicans
3858:Melicans
3829:Melicans
3784:Melicans
3756:Melicans
3710:Melicans
3673:Melicans
3644:Melicans
3637:idea for
3615:Melicans
3611:Sessions
3578:Melicans
3533:Melicans
3476:Melicans
3421:Melicans
3377:Melicans
3327:Melicans
3300:Melicans
3272:Melicans
3245:Melicans
3231:Comments
3146:Melicans
3116:Melicans
3014:Melicans
2983:Melicans
2943:Melicans
2902:Melicans
2867:Melicans
2814:Melicans
2783:Melicans
2748:Melicans
2708:Melicans
2653:Melicans
2589:Melicans
2572:cite web
2538:Melicans
2472:Melicans
2441:Melicans
2428:Brothers
2404:Melicans
2319:Melicans
2292:Melicans
2257:Melicans
2218:Melicans
2191:Melicans
2170:cite web
2150:citation
2145:Generic
1979:Melicans
1944:Melicans
1880:Melicans
1859:Melicans
1838:Melicans
1794:Melicans
1762:Melicans
1726:Melicans
1695:Melicans
1660:Melicans
1625:Melicans
1582:Melicans
1545:Melicans
1521:Melicans
1452:Melicans
1351:MTV Asia
1323:Melicans
1302:Melicans
1284:Comments
1220:Melicans
1055:Melicans
841:Comments
675:Cheers.
629:The Edge
544:Thanks.
450:Comments
210:for his
146:Analysis
54:Karanacs
50:promoted
3977:Support
3900:Singles
3892:Singles
3888:Singles
3854:No Line
3609:was in
3501:Support
3448:Support
3207:Support
3190:Comment
3049:webcite
2930:YouTube
2842:again?
2639:medium=
2635:people=
2096:author=
2003:Support
1820:No Line
1815:No Line
1751:reverse
1497:No Line
1432:Blender
1244:indopug
1183:Added.
964:shipped
931:Blender
436:Comment
372:Merbabu
342:Merbabu
294:WP:NFCI
138:Toolbox
89:protect
84:history
3572:, and
3070:Best,
3008:Well,
2939:Linear
2865:Done.
2504:Canal+
1341:Well,
1216:combed
789:(talk)
440:Ucucha
93:delete
3951:PL290
3907:PL290
3736:PL290
3699:Steve
3691:Does
3213:ceran
3168:Steve
3104:Steve
3087:Steve
3074:Steve
3059:Steve
3036:Steve
2965:Steve
2846:Steve
2740:Steve
2645:Steve
2530:Steve
2433:time=
2379:Steve
2132:Steve
2122:Steve
2028:Steve
2009:Steve
2005:from
1417:, or
1214:I've
881:prose
828:Steve
208:Steve
110:views
102:watch
98:links
16:<
4006:talk
3990:talk
3960:talk
3930:talk
3911:talk
3863:talk
3834:talk
3789:talk
3761:talk
3740:talk
3715:talk
3693:this
3678:talk
3649:talk
3620:talk
3583:talk
3560:and
3538:talk
3527:and
3481:talk
3426:talk
3382:talk
3371:one.
3332:talk
3305:talk
3294:one.
3277:talk
3250:talk
3220:thor
3198:talk
3151:talk
3121:talk
3098:here
3019:talk
2988:talk
2948:talk
2907:talk
2892:for
2890:ISSN
2872:talk
2832:Try
2819:talk
2788:talk
2753:talk
2713:talk
2658:talk
2594:talk
2543:talk
2477:talk
2446:talk
2409:talk
2366:talk
2350:Mojo
2324:talk
2297:talk
2282:and
2262:talk
2223:talk
2196:talk
2110:talk
2084:and
2022:EDIT
1984:talk
1968:talk
1949:talk
1932:talk
1915:talk
1885:talk
1864:talk
1843:talk
1828:talk
1799:talk
1767:talk
1731:talk
1700:talk
1665:talk
1630:talk
1587:talk
1550:talk
1526:talk
1501:here
1493:here
1457:talk
1440:Mojo
1419:Mojo
1405:and
1389:talk
1328:talk
1307:talk
1267:talk
1248:talk
1225:talk
1190:talk
1159:talk
1128:talk
1097:talk
1060:talk
1045:talk
1026:talk
1006:talk
979:talk
940:talk
916:and
914:Time
893:talk
865:talk
810:talk
783:Tony
715:talk
682:talk
638:talk
583:talk
531:talk
480:talk
468:do).
411:talk
392:talk
376:talk
361:talk
346:talk
331:talk
311:talk
284:talk
262:talk
245:talk
222:talk
175:talk
106:logs
80:talk
76:edit
3804:In
3570:MP3
3521:Fez
3137:KWW
2925:lot
2696:to
2577:to
2500:NRJ
2396:NME
1444:NME
960:not
296:: "
199:God
52:by
4008:,
3992:)
3962:,
3932:,
3913:)
3886:,
3865:,
3836:,
3791:,
3763:,
3742:)
3717:,
3680:,
3651:,
3622:,
3585:,
3568:,
3540:,
3503:-
3483:,
3464:)
3428:,
3413:)
3384:,
3359:)
3334:,
3307:,
3279:,
3252:,
3200:)
3153:,
3123:,
3021:,
2990:,
2950:,
2909:,
2874:,
2840:}}
2834:{{
2821:,
2790:,
2755:,
2734:}}
2728:{{
2715:,
2704:}}
2698:{{
2694:}}
2688:{{
2660:,
2596:,
2585:}}
2579:{{
2575:}}
2569:{{
2545:,
2518:}}
2512:{{
2502:.
2479:,
2448:,
2411:,
2394:,
2368:)
2352:.
2348:,
2344:,
2326:,
2299:,
2264:,
2225:,
2198:,
2189:.
2187:}}
2181:{{
2173:}}
2167:{{
2165:,
2163:}}
2157:{{
2153:}}
2147:{{
2112:)
2092:}}
2086:{{
2082:}}
2076:{{
2070::
2038::
1986:,
1970:)
1951:,
1934:)
1917:)
1887:,
1866:,
1845:,
1830:)
1801:,
1769:,
1733:,
1702:,
1667:,
1632:,
1589:,
1552:,
1528:,
1517:is
1459:,
1446:,
1442:,
1434:,
1413:,
1391:)
1330:,
1309:,
1269:,
1250:)
1227:,
1192:,
1161:,
1130:,
1099:,
1062:,
1047:)
1028:)
1008:,
981:,
942:,
895:,
867:,
812:,
717:,
684:,
640:,
585:,
533:,
482:,
413:)
394:,
378:)
363:)
348:)
333:)
313:,
286:)
264:,
247:)
239:?
224:,
203:U2
177:,
108:|
104:|
100:|
96:|
91:|
87:|
82:|
78:|
59:.
33:.
4012:)
4004:(
3988:(
3966:)
3958:(
3936:)
3928:(
3909:(
3869:)
3861:(
3840:)
3832:(
3795:)
3787:(
3767:)
3759:(
3738:(
3721:)
3713:(
3684:)
3676:(
3655:)
3647:(
3626:)
3618:(
3589:)
3581:(
3544:)
3536:(
3487:)
3479:(
3458:(
3432:)
3424:(
3407:(
3388:)
3380:(
3353:(
3338:)
3330:(
3311:)
3303:(
3283:)
3275:(
3256:)
3248:(
3196:(
3157:)
3149:(
3127:)
3119:(
3025:)
3017:(
2994:)
2986:(
2954:)
2946:(
2913:)
2905:(
2878:)
2870:(
2861:?
2825:)
2817:(
2794:)
2786:(
2775:'
2759:)
2751:(
2719:)
2711:(
2664:)
2656:(
2628:.
2600:)
2592:(
2549:)
2541:(
2506:.
2483:)
2475:(
2452:)
2444:(
2415:)
2407:(
2364:(
2354:Q
2330:)
2322:(
2303:)
2295:(
2268:)
2260:(
2244:'
2229:)
2221:(
2202:)
2194:(
2108:(
1990:)
1982:(
1966:(
1955:)
1947:(
1930:(
1913:(
1891:)
1883:(
1870:)
1862:(
1849:)
1841:(
1826:(
1805:)
1797:(
1773:)
1765:(
1737:)
1729:(
1706:)
1698:(
1671:)
1663:(
1636:)
1628:(
1593:)
1585:(
1556:)
1548:(
1532:)
1524:(
1495:(
1463:)
1455:(
1448:Q
1415:Q
1387:(
1334:)
1326:(
1313:)
1305:(
1273:)
1265:(
1246:(
1231:)
1223:(
1196:)
1188:(
1165:)
1157:(
1134:)
1126:(
1103:)
1095:(
1066:)
1058:(
1043:(
1024:(
1012:)
1004:(
985:)
977:(
946:)
938:(
899:)
891:(
871:)
863:(
816:)
808:(
721:)
713:(
688:)
680:(
644:)
636:(
589:)
581:(
537:)
529:(
486:)
478:(
409:(
398:)
390:(
374:(
359:(
344:(
329:(
317:)
309:(
282:(
268:)
260:(
243:(
228:)
220:(
181:)
173:(
112:)
74:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.