428:
Re. "inverted", sorry to be a dog worrying a bone but in what way was the order "reversed" -- do you mean it was cancelled by whoever gave it, overturned by someone else in authority, or simply ignored by the fleet? I'm keen not just to get the nuance right, but also to avoid "reversed" appearing in
467:
OMG, you didn't mean "order" as in "command", but "order" as in "sequence"...?! Heh, sorry but earlier you had "Scheer ordered the fleet..." and I gathered it was this order (command) that was "inverted" (or reversed or overturned, etc). Okay, let's start again but clarify: how about
738:
Parsecboy, could you please remind me whether you've had a close paraphrasing check in another FAC? I lose track, and we've seen many issues lately in MilHist articles ... not to pick on you :) Independent review is lacking, but it seems ships rarely get that.
853:
There's still a lot of words (order, joint operation, capture, issue) in common but I can see the argument those are all technical terms. I'd ping one of the admins because I don't know exactly what they want to address - it might have been fine as is.
556:
255:
186:
117:
868:
Getting a third opinion would be fine (perhaps
Nikkimaria could take a look at this?) - I've always thought that paraphrasing had more to do with similar sentence structure than with word choice, but I could be wrong.
810:
pg. 6 (not p. 14), Gardiner, Barrett and
Halpern are mostly in Google books; I didn't see anything close with the Staff, Gardiner or Barrett refs, but with Halpern Citation 46 was ok, but 47 has close-paraphrasing.
351:-- is it standard in the German Navy to say "the III Squadron" and not simply "III Squadron" (as we tend to in the Commonwealth)? If it was "3rd Squadron" the definite article would make sense but appears not.
189:. I feel this article is very close to FA quality, and any issues that are identified can be addressed during the review. Thanks in advance to all those who take the time to review this article.
185:; she was ultimately scuttled in Scapa Flow at the end of the war and later raised for scrapping. I wrote this article back in December last year; it has since passed a GA review a MILHIST
757:
I haven't had one - I took a bit of time off from FAC (and
Knowledge (XXG) in general) for a couple of months, which seems to have coincided with the close paraphrasing issue coming out.
365:
turn to port to bring his ships closer to the
British battlecruisers and the accompanying fast battleships of the 5th Battle Squadron; a minute later, the order to open fire was given.
88:
83:
92:
75:
529:
on reviewed criteria: 1(a), 1(d), 1(e), 2, and 4. Cool. In addition to the above, neutrality, stability, style, and detail criteria appear to be met. Cheers,
133:
40:
940:
926:
912:
892:
878:
863:
841:
801:
787:
766:
751:
732:
702:
676:
662:
648:
634:
611:
589:
564:
538:
509:
495:
462:
441:
414:
388:
333:
312:
288:
271:
243:
229:
213:
198:
165:
30:
17:
138:
79:
379:-- Must admit I thought "von" was capitalised when not preceded by the first name but perhaps I'm wrong, pls clarify for me. Cheers,
583:
393:
I don't actually know - I mainly have been doing that because it sounds right in my head (i.e., if one reads III aloud as Third)
71:
64:
819:
The doubts were overcome, and on 18 September the orders for the joint operation to capture Ösel and Moon Island were issued.
500:
Yup, gotta love multiple meanings for the same word that aren't exactly clear from context :) I opted for the first wording.
653:
That's just not the style guide used by academic historians. Generally the CMS is used in history journals, etc.
422:
Re. "unit", that's fine, just wanted to make sure it wasn't equivalent to "ship", which would've been redundant
303:
Be consistent in whether or not you provide publisher locations, and if so in what cases those are wikilinked.
815:
On 18 September, the order was issued for a joint operation with the army to capture Ösel and Moon
Islands;...
723:
267:
367:-- Was it Scheer who gave the order? Be nice to avoid the passive voice here and say that so-and-so did it.
783:
747:
419:
Re. "the III Squadron", I'm not going to make a fuss about it myself, main thing is that you're consistent
792:
I don't know that I can - it's pretty much all print sources, most of which I don't have easy access to.
548:
317:
Does what is essentially a dictionary definition really require a citation? Would linking "go-slow" to
371:
The series of reversals in course and confused maneuvers disorganized the fleet and inverted the order
888:
797:
308:
284:
208:
922:
859:
837:
908:
762:
658:
630:
505:
458:
410:
329:
239:
194:
161:
832:
I can try to review
Tarrant since its over half of the citations; the 1995 version is my library.
405:
I believe it should be capitalized just by itself if there is no name or rank. Thanks again, Ian.
709:
698:
672:
644:
607:
534:
491:
437:
384:
362:
263:
225:
918:
855:
833:
776:
740:
182:
300:
Be consistent in how page ranges are notated. For example, why "pp. 246–7" but "pp. 231–232"?
344:-- prose generally appears to be good, and all statements appear to be cited; some points:
936:
884:
874:
793:
304:
280:
178:
904:
758:
654:
626:
573:
560:
501:
454:
406:
325:
235:
190:
157:
453:
led the line initially but afterward was located close to the rear of the formation).
355:
In early 1914, Friedrich der Grosse participated in additional ship and unit training.
694:
668:
640:
603:
530:
487:
433:
380:
221:
53:
775:
If you ping
Nikkimaria, she may do it, but the poor dear is terribly overworked :)
470:
The series of reversals in course and confused maneuvers disorganized the fleet and
619:
599:
903:"Ersatz" means "replacement", I was just spelling it out for non-German speakers.
447:
109:
883:
It's both, but in this particular case I'd say it's been sufficiently rephrased.
818:
814:
294:"The crewmen intentionally worked slow as a form of passive resistance" - source?
806:
I'm not familiar with the actual issue/checking procedure, but here goes: Staff
260:
But I still can't get over the fact that Grosse is spelled without the Eszett ß.
932:
870:
349:
Friedrich der Grosse was assigned to the III Squadron of the High Seas Fleet
625:
appears to be solely
Harvard referencing, which is not used by historians.
318:
486:) if that's what you mean. Don't you love the English language? Cheers,
181:
for the majority of World War I and saw heavy service, including the
118:
Featured article candidates/SMS Friedrich der Grosse (1911)/archive1
39:
Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in
708:
No comment on the article, but TGilmour is a blocked sockpuppet.
826:
a replacement for the obsolete coastal defense ship
Heimdall
481:
in course and confused maneuvers disorganized the fleet and
402:
Substituted "reversed" for "inverted" - is that clearer now?
446:
It's just that the order of the ships was reversed (i.e.,
143:
847:
552:
324:
Fixed the rest. Thanks for checking these, Nikkimaria.
105:
101:
97:
57:
321:
rather than using the footnote make everyone happy?
207:- There are no dead links but there are two dabs.
963:The above discussion is preserved as an archive.
824:Parsecboy, citation 3 doesn't say anything about
399:Yes, Scheer gave the order - passive voice fixed.
41:Knowledge (XXG) talk:Featured article candidates
373:-- What exactly do you mean by "inverted" here?
43:. No further edits should be made to this page.
693:Really meets the criteria. Brilliant article.
572:all images used in article are acceptably PD.
969:No further edits should be made to this page.
29:The following is an archived discussion of a
8:
931:No worries, I can see why you thought that.
828:, you probably need to cite that separately.
18:Knowledge (XXG):Featured article candidates
122:
429:the same sentence as "reversals"... ;-)
125:
115:
396:"Unit" here refers to the III Squadron
357:-- What is a "unit" in this instance?
7:
483:reversed the sequence of the ships
472:inverted the sequence of the ships
24:
555:made since I reviewed this for
425:Re. change to active voice, tks
72:SMS Friedrich der Grosse (1911)
65:SMS Friedrich der Grosse (1911)
258:and have nothing to add here.
254:I had reviewed the article at
1:
361:At 17:45, Scheer ordered a
342:Prose & citation review
31:featured article nomination
986:
917:Got it, sorry about that!
913:15:03, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
842:14:37, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
802:15:30, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
788:15:24, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
767:15:18, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
752:15:11, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
703:02:45, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
677:07:49, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
663:14:47, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
649:13:47, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
635:12:24, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
612:12:12, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
590:21:16, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
565:04:36, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
539:12:14, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
510:11:50, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
496:02:26, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
463:01:50, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
442:01:28, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
415:16:44, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
389:08:55, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
334:16:44, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
313:01:18, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
289:01:18, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
966:Please do not modify it.
941:17:56, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
927:16:04, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
893:03:33, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
879:17:56, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
864:16:04, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
733:02:55, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
432:Re. "Von", tks. Cheers,
377:made clear to von Reuter
272:13:24, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
244:03:03, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
230:23:19, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
214:20:15, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
199:17:40, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
177:was the flagship of the
166:17:40, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
36:Please do not modify it.
279:- spotchecks not done.
234:Thanks to both of you.
551:, having reviewed the
175:Friedrich der Grosse
56:23:28, 10 July 2011
549:standard disclaimer
297:Smolke or Schmolke?
850:look re: Halpern?
817:vs. Halpern p.214
585:Operation Big Bear
730:
598:What about using
261:
183:Battle of Jutland
169:
151:
150:
977:
968:
820:
816:
780:
744:
729:
724:
721:
624:
618:
586:
580:
259:
211:
154:
123:
113:
95:
48:The article was
38:
985:
984:
980:
979:
978:
976:
975:
974:
973:
964:
778:
742:
725:
718:
714:
710:
622:
616:
588:
584:
574:
209:
179:High Seas Fleet
86:
70:
68:
34:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
983:
981:
972:
971:
958:
956:
955:
954:
953:
952:
951:
950:
949:
948:
947:
946:
945:
944:
943:
901:
900:
899:
898:
897:
896:
895:
830:
821:
811:
770:
769:
736:
735:
716:
712:
688:
687:
686:
685:
684:
683:
682:
681:
680:
679:
582:
543:
523:
522:
521:
520:
519:
518:
517:
516:
515:
514:
513:
512:
477:The series of
430:
426:
423:
420:
403:
400:
397:
394:
374:
368:
358:
352:
339:
338:
337:
336:
322:
301:
298:
295:
256:A-class review
249:
248:
247:
246:
217:
216:
187:A-class review
171:
170:
156:Nominator(s):
149:
148:
147:
146:
144:External links
141:
136:
128:
127:
121:
120:
67:
62:
61:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
982:
970:
967:
961:
960:
959:
942:
938:
934:
930:
929:
928:
924:
920:
916:
915:
914:
910:
906:
902:
894:
890:
886:
882:
881:
880:
876:
872:
867:
866:
865:
861:
857:
852:
851:
849:
845:
844:
843:
839:
835:
831:
829:
827:
822:
812:
809:
805:
804:
803:
799:
795:
791:
790:
789:
785:
781:
774:
773:
772:
771:
768:
764:
760:
756:
755:
754:
753:
749:
745:
734:
731:
728:
722:
720:
707:
706:
705:
704:
700:
696:
692:
678:
674:
670:
666:
665:
664:
660:
656:
652:
651:
650:
646:
642:
638:
637:
636:
632:
628:
621:
615:
614:
613:
609:
605:
601:
597:
594:
593:
592:
591:
587:
581:
579:
578:
571:
570:Image review:
567:
566:
562:
558:
554:
550:
547:on prose per
546:
541:
540:
536:
532:
528:
511:
507:
503:
499:
498:
497:
493:
489:
485:
484:
480:
474:
473:
466:
465:
464:
460:
456:
452:
451:
445:
444:
443:
439:
435:
431:
427:
424:
421:
418:
417:
416:
412:
408:
404:
401:
398:
395:
392:
391:
390:
386:
382:
378:
375:
372:
369:
366:
364:
359:
356:
353:
350:
347:
346:
345:
343:
335:
331:
327:
323:
320:
316:
315:
314:
310:
306:
302:
299:
296:
293:
292:
291:
290:
286:
282:
278:
277:Source review
274:
273:
269:
265:
264:MisterBee1966
257:
253:
245:
241:
237:
233:
232:
231:
227:
223:
219:
218:
215:
212:
206:
203:
202:
201:
200:
196:
192:
188:
184:
180:
176:
168:
167:
163:
159:
153:
152:
145:
142:
140:
137:
135:
132:
131:
130:
129:
124:
119:
116:
114:
111:
107:
103:
99:
94:
90:
85:
81:
77:
73:
66:
63:
60:
58:
55:
51:
44:
42:
37:
32:
27:
26:
19:
965:
962:
957:
825:
823:
807:
737:
726:
711:
690:
689:
667:Understood.
600:Template:sfn
595:
576:
575:
569:
568:
561:push to talk
544:
542:
526:
524:
482:
478:
476:
471:
469:
449:
376:
370:
360:
354:
348:
341:
340:
276:
275:
251:
250:
205:DAB/EL check
204:
174:
172:
155:
139:Citation bot
69:
49:
47:
35:
28:
848:this change
808:Battleships
559:. - Dank (
479:alterations
885:Nikkimaria
794:Nikkimaria
305:Nikkimaria
281:Nikkimaria
262:Well done
210:GamerPro64
933:Parsecboy
905:Parsecboy
871:Parsecboy
846:How does
813:Article:
759:Parsecboy
655:Parsecboy
627:Parsecboy
577:Wizardman
502:Parsecboy
455:Parsecboy
407:Parsecboy
363:two-point
326:Parsecboy
236:Parsecboy
191:Parsecboy
158:Parsecboy
695:TGilmour
669:TGilmour
641:TGilmour
604:TGilmour
531:Ian Rose
488:Ian Rose
434:Ian Rose
381:Ian Rose
319:Slowdown
222:TGilmour
134:Analysis
54:Karanacs
50:promoted
779:Georgia
743:Georgia
719:anguard
691:Support
596:Comment
557:A-class
553:changes
545:Support
527:Support
252:Support
220:Fixed.
126:Toolbox
89:protect
84:history
93:delete
777:Sandy
741:Sandy
639:Why?
450:König
110:views
102:watch
98:links
16:<
937:talk
923:talk
919:Kirk
909:talk
889:talk
875:talk
860:talk
856:Kirk
838:talk
834:Kirk
798:talk
784:Talk
763:talk
748:Talk
727:Wha?
715:ven
699:talk
673:talk
659:talk
645:talk
631:talk
608:talk
535:talk
525:(OD)
506:talk
492:talk
475:(or
459:talk
448:SMS
438:talk
411:talk
385:talk
330:talk
309:talk
285:talk
268:talk
240:talk
226:talk
195:talk
173:SMS
162:talk
106:logs
80:talk
76:edit
620:sfn
52:by
939:)
925:)
911:)
891:)
877:)
862:)
840:)
800:)
786:)
765:)
750:)
701:)
675:)
661:)
647:)
633:)
623:}}
617:{{
610:)
602:?
563:)
537:)
508:)
494:)
461:)
440:)
413:)
387:)
332:)
311:)
287:)
270:)
242:)
228:)
197:)
164:)
108:|
104:|
100:|
96:|
91:|
87:|
82:|
78:|
59:.
33:.
935:(
921:(
907:(
887:(
873:(
858:(
836:(
796:(
782:(
761:(
746:(
717:M
713:S
697:(
671:(
657:(
643:(
629:(
606:(
533:(
504:(
490:(
457:(
436:(
409:(
383:(
328:(
307:(
283:(
266:(
238:(
224:(
193:(
160:(
112:)
74:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.