Knowledge

:Featured article candidates/Song Dynasty - Knowledge

Source 📝

72:; this article was raised to GA status a while back, and although it failed its FAC review, after many improvements to the article I am renominating it for FA status. The main issue with the last review was copyright issues for a few of the article's images, which have since been solved with those images replaced with stable GNU licensed and public domain images from Commons. It is well sourced, stable (no edit-warring), has no startling POV statements, and is now well-written with many recent copyedits. There are a total of six related sub-articles created for this main article, including 676:. Plus, the information on the military represents only one paragraph in this article here (albeit a large one), which hardly warrants an entire section (let alone the fact that all the military information is already placed in a listed sub-article). The architecture section at least has two large paragraphs.-- 639:
Maybe it's just me but I don't see the military as part of 'society', but rather I think it should have its own section on the main Song Dynasty page. It's certainly important enough to warrant its own section and subpage. You already have a lot of information scattered around various sections of the
410:
As you have requested, I have delinked all years that have no relevant additional information associated with this article. I have also deleted AD throughout the article except for its first mentioning in the dates of the first lead paragraph. In the sentence you have shown above I have also delinked
653:
article, which is summarized here in the "Society" section for the main Song Dynasty article. I am just following wiki standards of having a main article that is summarized in a section of another article. In summarizing the military info in this article section, it allows the reader to know which
432:
One more thing though, about the "scrunching" of text with the infobox, is there some sort of wikipedia standard that says I should not "scrunch" with pics and an infobox, or is this a personal preference of yours? In any case I have remedied the situation by moving the infobox up a bit and one of
150:). Please remove the scrollref box that obscures references; it was AfD'd for a reason (it doesn't print, and doesn't mirror). Please remove the self references to GA and FA from See also, and articles included in the text shouldn't also be linked in See also (see 505:
In addressing another one of your claims, Sandy, I have made many general improvements to the article in rewording some sentences and delinking many words that are not high value or informative links for this article. I hope you find the new improvements
467:
I want to make it absolutely clear that I did not move that picture back to the top where it was scrunching the text, that was an edit by another wiki editor. I have moved it back down so that the text is not scrunched, and provided my rationale in the
528:- I think the article is extremely good and beautifully laid out. I would suggest that under "Society, culture, economy, and technology you vary more the beginning of subsections and not start so many in a row with "The Song Dynasty..." -- 754:- nice. I'm postiing a couple of text-massage opportunities....I think the suggestions below are insufficient to be deal-breakers, but I think they are worth looking at and thinking about). The text is more polished than 625:
Hi Миборовский, I have addressed your concern by adding a big-ole whopping paragraph in the Society section on the Song military, and adding a new picture to aid the new text. I hope Mikey likes it. Lol. :)
176:
Wow! You're quick! Lol. Nice to see you around again, Sandy, it's been a while. Sure thing, I'll fix all this stuff, didn't know there were problems with any of the things you've listed, but I will fix them
693:
Nevermind! Wiki member Mattisse and I have fixed the problem by creating new sub-headings and a new over-heading. The military now has its own sub-section under society, not culture, which makes no sense.--
481:
And as for the infobox years still being linked, I tried delinking them all, but the links won't go away! Your guess is probably as good as mine in understanding why the infobox is fussy like that.--
108:, all of which are summarized within the main article. Due to so many branch articles with separate info aiding the main Song Dynasty article, this article is not excessively long, only 46 KB.-- 63: 798:
Although weakened, the Song economy was not in ruins as the Southern Song contained 60 percent of China's population and a majority of the most productive agricultural land
325:
Also, why is AD mentioned throughout? Isn't it OK just to mention it once? There is still text between the History of China infobox on the right and images on the left.
411:
puppeteers, acrobats, prostitutes, restaurants, and banquets, but kept the others with disambiguation to other articles with relevant info on China, such as
838: 666: 541:
You know what, Matisse? I think I'll see what I can do with that, I'm glad you brought that up, otherwise I would not have even noticed the repetition.--
40: 30: 17: 784:
these 2 sentences as the first is rather short. I just love semicolons and they cheer me up. I think this is a great place for one.
729: 104: 399:
Since you brought it up, I attributed the one quote in the article to the historians Ebrey, Walthall, and Palais in the text.--
769: 98: 649:
Well, the reason why it is under the "Society" section is because all of the information about the military is found in the
552:
I just updated the society sub-section with info on law and order, justice and early forensic science in the Song period.--
146:), and text is scrunched between images and an infobox. Templates are placed incorrectly at the bottom of sections (see 650: 275: 92: 86: 80: 74: 279: 218:
Wait, which solo years do you see linked? By solo years do you mean people's birth and death dates? I am confused.--
725: 660: 338:, common terms known to most English speakers need not be linked, and detract from the high value links, example: 823: 773: 739: 710: 701: 684: 644: 634: 616: 603: 588: 576: 556: 545: 532: 510: 498: 485: 472: 462: 437: 423: 403: 386: 222: 213: 190: 181: 167: 130: 112: 599:. Almost nothing about the Song military? Write up a good section on the military, and you get my support. -- 672: 707: 641: 613: 600: 458: 382: 209: 163: 126: 817: 736: 695: 678: 628: 585: 553: 542: 507: 495: 482: 469: 434: 420: 400: 219: 187: 178: 109: 419:
of singers and musicians. I hope all of this is sufficient in addressing those claims mentioned.--
186:
Hi Sandy, I am happy to say that I believe I've now fixed all of the MOS issues you have raised.--
763: 800:- change "Southern Song" to "the South" to reduce repetition (or is this introducing ambiguity?) 200:, the author of a quote of a sentence or more must be attributed in the text, not the footnote. 451: 375: 335: 331: 202: 156: 119: 342:
There were entertainment quarters in the city, such as in Hangzhou, with a constant array of
733: 494:
It looks like someone fixed the infobox years and delinked them. Good looking out, people.--
412: 351: 259: 235: 151: 147: 143: 654:
main article to look at if they want to know more about a given topic, such as looking in
573: 416: 355: 305: 139: 759: 529: 447: 197: 359: 290: 57: 367: 790:
Between the 10th and 11th centuries, the population of China doubled in size.
808:- try "The Southern Song Dynasty considerably bolstered naval strength" (?) 363: 343: 812: 755: 658:
for more information on the Song military. For what I am supporting, see
433:
the pics down to the last paragraph of the Northern Song sub-section.--
371: 347: 251: 286: 837:
Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in
39:
Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in
69: 584:. Excellent prose, proper citations, and extremely FA-worthy. -- 313: 309: 298: 294: 271: 267: 247: 227:
Here are examples—does the reader benefit from the year links?
243: 806:
The Southern Song Dynasty built considerable naval strength..
319:
All of the solo years in the Song Dynasty infobox are linked.
728:
around the Song Dynasty. You have my offer to help with the
572:-- excellent in coverage and sourcing, elegant in writing. 640:
article, but I just think it would be better together. --
142:
on date ranges throughout, solo years are overlinked (see
450:; text is still scrunched between images and infobox. 274:) refers to the period after the Song lost control of 732:
next week when a couple books that I ordered arrive.
316:
AD), both the Jin Dynasty and Western Xia Dynasty ...
254:
and the dynasty controlled most of inner China. The
831:The above discussion is preserved as an archive. 815:, it looks much better after the recent edits.-- 724:- really astounding work! You are approaching a 250:), the Song capital was in the northern city of 841:. No further edits should be made to this page. 811:Awesome! I'm glad you like the article; as for 43:. No further edits should be made to this page. 29:The following is an archived discussion of a 8: 839:Knowledge talk:Featured article candidates 667:Knowledge:Guide to writing better articles 41:Knowledge talk:Featured article candidates 301:AD) initially invaded the Jin Dynasty ... 138:MOS fixes needed, there is incorrect use 68:The Song Dynasty (960-1279 AD) era of 196:Why are solo years linked? Also, see 18:Knowledge:Featured article candidates 7: 780:I'd think about a semicolon between 304:Under the continuing leadership of 24: 792:- swap clauses to eliminate comma 782:.. 960–1279 AD. It succeeded... 362:, and places to relax such as 1: 824:03:16, 24 August 2007 (UTC) 774:02:49, 24 August 2007 (UTC) 740:01:00, 19 August 2007 (UTC) 711:19:25, 17 August 2007 (UTC) 702:18:06, 17 August 2007 (UTC) 685:17:15, 17 August 2007 (UTC) 656:Society of the Song Dynasty 651:Society of the Song Dynasty 645:16:16, 17 August 2007 (UTC) 635:14:34, 17 August 2007 (UTC) 617:19:25, 17 August 2007 (UTC) 604:03:38, 17 August 2007 (UTC) 589:00:32, 17 August 2007 (UTC) 577:13:20, 16 August 2007 (UTC) 557:21:48, 10 August 2007 (UTC) 546:21:09, 10 August 2007 (UTC) 533:19:19, 10 August 2007 (UTC) 511:14:33, 10 August 2007 (UTC) 499:12:29, 10 August 2007 (UTC) 486:02:17, 10 August 2007 (UTC) 473:20:26, 10 August 2007 (UTC) 463:18:20, 10 August 2007 (UTC) 438:02:15, 10 August 2007 (UTC) 424:02:12, 10 August 2007 (UTC) 131:02:20, 15 August 2007 (UTC) 31:featured article nomination 858: 404:20:47, 9 August 2007 (UTC) 387:22:23, 9 August 2007 (UTC) 223:20:38, 9 August 2007 (UTC) 214:20:12, 9 August 2007 (UTC) 191:19:04, 9 August 2007 (UTC) 182:17:17, 9 August 2007 (UTC) 168:15:33, 9 August 2007 (UTC) 113:15:20, 9 August 2007 (UTC) 706:Alright, fair enough. -- 661:Knowledge:Guide to layout 263: 239: 118:MOS concerns, addressed. 834:Please do not modify it. 36:Please do not modify it. 673:Knowledge:Summary style 52:18:13, 25 August 2007. 415:for storytellers and 356:singers and musicians 730:architecture article 822: 819:Pericles of Athens 700: 697:Pericles of Athens 683: 680:Pericles of Athens 633: 630:Pericles of Athens 816: 694: 677: 627: 198:WP:MOS#Quotations 849: 836: 820: 698: 681: 631: 586:Hemlock Martinis 554:PericlesofAthens 543:PericlesofAthens 508:PericlesofAthens 496:PericlesofAthens 483:PericlesofAthens 470:PericlesofAthens 455: 435:PericlesofAthens 421:PericlesofAthens 413:Chinese folklore 401:PericlesofAthens 379: 370:, and organized 265: 241: 220:PericlesofAthens 206: 188:PericlesofAthens 179:PericlesofAthens 160: 123: 110:PericlesofAthens 48:The article was 38: 857: 856: 852: 851: 850: 848: 847: 846: 845: 832: 818: 696: 679: 629: 522: 521: 453: 377: 330:Also, refer to 204: 158: 133: 121: 61: 34: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 855: 853: 844: 843: 828: 827: 826: 802: 801: 794: 793: 786: 785: 777: 776: 743: 742: 726:featured topic 718: 717: 716: 715: 714: 713: 691: 690: 689: 688: 687: 620: 619: 607: 597:Oppose for now 592: 591: 579: 566: 565: 564: 563: 562: 561: 560: 559: 536: 535: 520: 519: 518: 517: 516: 515: 514: 513: 492: 491: 490: 489: 488: 479: 478: 477: 476: 475: 430: 429: 428: 427: 426: 417:Music of China 397: 396: 395: 394: 393: 392: 391: 390: 389: 327: 322: 321: 320: 317: 302: 283: 276:northern China 184: 171: 170: 134: 117: 116: 60: 55: 54: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 854: 842: 840: 835: 829: 825: 821: 814: 810: 809: 807: 804: 803: 799: 796: 795: 791: 788: 787: 783: 779: 778: 775: 771: 768: 765: 761: 757: 753: 750: 749: 745: 744: 741: 738: 735: 731: 727: 723: 720: 719: 712: 709: 705: 704: 703: 699: 692: 686: 682: 675: 674: 669: 668: 663: 662: 657: 652: 648: 647: 646: 643: 638: 637: 636: 632: 624: 623: 622: 621: 618: 615: 611: 608: 606: 605: 602: 598: 594: 593: 590: 587: 583: 580: 578: 575: 571: 568: 567: 558: 555: 551: 550: 549: 548: 547: 544: 540: 539: 538: 537: 534: 531: 527: 524: 523: 512: 509: 506:sufficient.-- 504: 503: 502: 501: 500: 497: 493: 487: 484: 480: 474: 471: 466: 465: 464: 460: 456: 449: 448:WP:MOS#Images 445: 444: 443: 442: 441: 440: 439: 436: 431: 425: 422: 418: 414: 409: 408: 407: 406: 405: 402: 398: 388: 384: 380: 373: 369: 365: 361: 357: 353: 349: 345: 341: 340: 339: 337: 333: 328: 326: 323: 318: 315: 311: 307: 303: 300: 296: 292: 288: 284: 281: 277: 273: 269: 261: 257: 256:Southern Song 253: 249: 245: 237: 233: 232:Northern Song 229: 228: 226: 225: 224: 221: 217: 216: 215: 211: 207: 201: 199: 194: 193: 192: 189: 185: 183: 180: 175: 174: 173: 172: 169: 165: 161: 155: 153: 149: 145: 141: 136: 135: 132: 128: 124: 115: 114: 111: 107: 106: 101: 100: 95: 94: 89: 88: 83: 82: 77: 76: 71: 66: 65: 59: 56: 53: 51: 44: 42: 37: 32: 27: 26: 19: 833: 830: 805: 797: 789: 781: 766: 751: 747: 746: 721: 671: 665: 659: 655: 609: 596: 595: 581: 569: 525: 352:storytellers 329: 324: 291:Genghis Khan 255: 231: 195: 137: 105:Architecture 103: 97: 91: 85: 79: 73: 67: 64:previous FAC 62: 58:Song Dynasty 49: 47: 35: 28: 758:. cheers, 708:Миборовский 642:Миборовский 614:Миборовский 601:Миборовский 368:restaurants 360:prostitutes 306:Ögedei Khan 280:Jin Dynasty 230:During the 574:Chensiyuan 364:tea houses 344:puppeteers 336:WP:CONTEXT 332:WP:MOSLINK 99:Technology 289:, led by 152:WP:LAYOUT 148:WP:LAYOUT 144:WP:MOSNUM 813:Augustus 770:contribs 760:Casliber 756:Augustus 748:Comments 737:Recorder 530:Mattisse 372:banquets 348:acrobats 50:promoted 752:Support 722:Support 610:Support 582:Support 570:Support 526:Comment 468:edit.-- 454:Georgia 378:Georgia 287:Mongols 278:to the 260:Chinese 252:Kaifeng 236:Chinese 205:Georgia 159:Georgia 122:Georgia 93:Economy 87:Society 81:Culture 75:History 177:now.-- 140:dashes 102:, and 452:Sandy 376:Sandy 203:Sandy 157:Sandy 120:Sandy 70:China 16:< 764:talk 459:Talk 446:See 383:Talk 334:and 314:1241 310:1229 299:1227 295:1206 293:(r. 285:The 272:1279 268:1127 248:1127 210:Talk 164:Talk 127:Talk 734:D. 612:-- 244:960 772:) 670:, 664:, 626:-- 461:) 385:) 374:. 366:, 358:, 354:, 350:, 346:, 266:, 264:南宋 262:: 242:, 240:北宋 238:: 212:) 166:) 154:). 129:) 96:, 90:, 84:, 78:, 33:. 767:· 762:( 457:( 381:( 312:– 308:( 297:– 282:. 270:– 258:( 246:– 234:( 208:( 162:( 125:(

Index

Knowledge:Featured article candidates
featured article nomination
Knowledge talk:Featured article candidates
Song Dynasty
previous FAC
China
History
Culture
Society
Economy
Technology
Architecture
PericlesofAthens
15:20, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
SandyGeorgia
Talk
02:20, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
dashes
WP:MOSNUM
WP:LAYOUT
WP:LAYOUT
SandyGeorgia
Talk
15:33, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
PericlesofAthens
17:17, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
PericlesofAthens
19:04, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
WP:MOS#Quotations
SandyGeorgia

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.