1418:, which uses two sources on the doubt side, one of which addresses the topic vary narrowly and is useless in our context, and the other which can no longer be found. Such is the internet! So I went looking for other sources and believe Porter writing in his column at the bloodhorse is a very high quality source - he's a professional pedigree analyst speaking in an area of his expertise. The Sophia Stallions site is for a professional breeding operation and the article is very well written so I thought it okay to include. I just found another profound dissent from "pedigreegoddess" Anne Peters (she really is an expert, though the URL is pretty funny).
994:
way before "she said", etc, by many publishers everywhere. The US Council of
Science Editors insists on outside the quotemarks (the so-called "logical" method), to avoid "misquoting" the punctuation where it wasn't in the source. Normal UK and Commonwealth practice is outside the quotemarks ("logical" method), to avoid "misquoting" the punctuation where it wasn't in the source. Please don't change your personal practice outside WP!
455:, I added the Point 2 rationale to the screenshots, had to tweak the templates a little to make it appear (there was a "commercial" parameter on the images, but it wasn't showing up). On the Secretariat statue, Jlvsclrk added an appropriate photographer's release, but the copyright on the statue itself is held by the artist and I think it's PD-no-notice, so I re-added that template as well, I think we need both.
1425:
The book cited was added by someone who apparently had a hardcopy, I can't recall who, but without a page number and as we can't access the snippet view, we have to go with what exists. The Blood Horse cite is solid. The other isn't great, but itself does cite third-party sources. I agree that Anne
993:
Jlv, it's been the subject of bitter disputes at MOS, but whenever someone proposes to change the rule, there's a groundswell of opposition. You'll find most US publishers use the inside-the-quote-mark method. Many news outlets outside the US also use it. Direct quotations in novels are rendered that
619:
as the GA reviewer. It is very well-written, and worthy of being a FA. The GA review was a bit more stringent than customary but whatever needed tweaking beyond that appears to have been handled. After GA promotion, it went through yet another review by
Wehwalt. If it needed any further tweaking,
105:
winner and one of the finest racehorses in history. This is a high-importance article for WikiProject Horse racing and one that has has a substantial amount of work put in by many editors, not just the nominators. We welcome a comprehensive review for an article on a topic important to the project.
1731:
I could have sworn I'd changed those already. website= paramater automatically italicizes so I've changed
Arlington Park to arlington.com for example. The website is a publication, is it not? To be safe though, I changed the sources for the sections on the Meadow Event Park and Secretariat Centre to
353:
can deal with 1, 3, 4. I fixed 2. re 5 - the photo was taken by me and is public domain. I'm sure I don't understand
American copyright law on the statue itself but the original was produced in 1974 and is now at the Hall of Fame. The version in the picture is a replica installed in 1988 as noted in
1409:
I assume this is regarding the sources for the last paragraph about the X-factor theory. Some background here first. The "pro" X-factor club are online and vocal, while most breeding professionals seem dismissive (thinking it grossly over-simplistic) to the point of not writing much about it. So we
1391:
FN20 - now split into 3 refs to get appropriate page #s. FN57 - "Sham..." don't have access to this book and unfortunately the bit is not in the sample online chapter. Should I delete the sentence, or change to something like "..., Secretariat's chances in the
Kentucky Derby became the subject of
1354:
The past performance table posted on secretariat.com (but sourced from the Daily Racing Form) indicates if a horse is the favorite in a given race with a star by the odds (shown as *.40 for example), and the
Sanford is the only one where he wasn't. Is it synth to turn this coding into the comment
923:
For the upper sections, yes. I'm unsure about conversion rules and conventions, but was just pointing it out. "The colt soon started distinguishing himself from the other foals."âwould this be ok? "The colt soon distinguished himself from the other foals." â "not sure what the error is" ... more
1056:
LOL. The background section on his breeding has sometimes read like a mystery novel. Fun to read but... LMK if it reads better with the new opening sentence in the background. I don't know if we can add something to the intro without disrupting the flow and maintaining the interest level. -
942:
Hi Tony, I did your suggested wording change - agree it reads better. My question was on the later part of the bullet where you said "Just after, there's a comma before closing quotes." That's where I'm not sure what the error is - the comma I see is followed by a 'he said' construction.
1355:
used? I suppose a more direct translation of the chart data would lead to the comment "Secretariat was the favorite in every race except the
Sanford." Alternatively, I could add the stars to the table with a note at the bottom on what it means. Any suggestions.
601:
I had a fair number of comments at the peer review and did some editing myself. Seems an excellent article on a significant figure, both in the sports world and culturally. One of the earliest sports events I remember watching was the
Belmont that year. Well
502:, does the fact that the statue in question is a copy (installed at Belmont in 1988, produced who knows when) affect matters, or is it the date of the original (or the mold with which both copies were created I suppose) that matters? Just want to be sure!
207:
I chopped the first sentence in two - LMK if it's now too choppy. In what's now the second sentence, I tried to come up with something better than "greatest races of all time" but that's at least supported in the article already. LMK if I should rework
1159:
On my screen, moving up the horse anatomy chart runs into the quote box in the preceding section, our intent was to have the table and the chart side-by-side. Open to suggestions for improvement, but I'm not quite sure if there is a solution...
1052:
I'd mention both his parents in the lead, or at least a bit sooner in "Background". Came as a little surprise to me who his mother was, after the coin-tossing stories. Or is that intended? - I should have looked at the infobox where they are ;)
298:, and what do you mean by "connections"? Same with File:Secretariat_1973_Preakness_Winners_Circle.jpg, and having two non-free images with the exact same rationale reduces the justification for including them - suggest expanding or reframing
321:
replace it with the
Saratoga image, but it would be nice if we could keep the Belmont one, because that's the most famous version and a better photo. Given that we are dealing with a 1988 copy of a 1974 original statue, I am going to ping
1387:
FN8 - I don't have access to the book originally used as source, so I changed to use Bill Nack's book. Also clarified that it was two mares being sent, not necessarily two foals being produced (since this matters in the paragraph that
786:"Chenery got her first look at the foal and made a one word entry in her notebook:"âmaybe, but it's on the informal edge of the envelope, I think. Hyphen. "Chenery first saw the foal and made a one-word entry in her notebook:"?
709:"United States" should definitely not be linked. "$ " is linked ... that's not normal, and as a reader I'd rather know that it's "US$ " than have to hover over the $ to find out. Also, the dollar symbol hangs below the line.
1065:
The poem, which was written in the 1930s, is about the yearning in horse racing to see another great one come along. Sheer coincidence that
Secretariat, like Man o' War, was "a chestnut colt, and he's got a star"
1426:
Peters' site is a professional page, not just someone's random blog and as such an RS; that said, she doesn't cite her source material for her "debunking" claims, which limits the degree to which we can use it.
1317:
everything we say in the lead is supported in the body of the article. The icon phrase comes from the last paragraph before the start of the Belmont Stakes where it talks about him becoming a cultural phenomenon.
516:
I shouldn't think so, if they are exact copies. It's original publication before 1978 without a copyright notice that creates the lack of a copyright. Are we confident the original lacks a copyright notice?--
1677:
Access dates - used for all. Publication dates - added a few that were originally missed, but not applicable in many cases (eg, equibase is a database) or not given (eg, FN14 ESPN.com article has no date).
1583:
Is there a difference between news/periodical refs that use website name )eg. latimes.com) and those that use the actual publication title? If not, should be consistent, and I'd suggest doing the latter.
1587:
I've changed to the latter, unless the website itself uses ".com". For example, thestar.com is titled as such as the page, and you only see Toronto Star in the end section. wonder if its a legal thing?
778:"The colt soon started distinguishing himself from the other foals."âwould this be ok? "The colt soon distinguished himself from the other foals." Just after, there's a comma before closing quotes.
358:, but it doesn't have the blanket of carnations they place on Belmont Day. The original is one of the few objects at the Hall of Fame that you're allowed to photograph so I'm pretty sure it's fine.
301:"Connections" are the people associated with the horse. I will tweak that phrasing at the image page. I also changed the rationale for the Kentucky Derby image, does that improve matters? âMTBW
686:
have to put up with ugly, clunky, large fractions in inline text. I suppose the guideline for conversion to international units doesn't apply (?). There are inches in the table, unconverted.
184:
Where it says Secretariat's birthplace is on the NRHP, I guess that means the whole farm The Meadow, but the way it's written now it sounds sort of like the exact spot is what's on the NRHP.
438:
I think montanabw originally suggested that particular license because of the subject matter. Assuming the statue is fair game, I've changed the license to self|cc-by-sa-4.0 (share alike).
1156:
In "Appearance and conformation": I could imagine the image higher, to have the table less squeezed on a small screen, - also good to have the image where the terms are mentioned first.
306:
File:Secretariat_statue.jpg: what is the copyright status of the photo, and are we sure about the copyright expiration? Skeaping seems to have made several later copies of the statue.
480:
If it was published in 1974, I guess the question is, is there a copyright notice on the statue? If there is not, the tag is good, if there is, and it is proper, you're out of luck.--
466:
We would need tags for both the photo and the statue, yes. I'm not sure though that PD-no-notice is the appropriate tag, and would like to hear from Wehwalt or others on that point.
102:
979:
Huh, I've been doing this wrong for my entire life. Spot checking, so are most of the sources. Learn something every day. Will fix this and a few other uses in the article.
166:
I think it would look better for the part about the heart weight to say, "(8.5 lbs, or 3.9 kgs)" instead of double parentheses around the kilograms, which looks clunky.
1376:
Be consistent in whether books include location of publication - some do, some don't. If you do include them, be consistent in how you format state (eg. Ky. vs VA)
1474:
and synonyms throughout - some things are italicized that shouldn't be (eg Bluefield College, FN18), while others are not that should be (eg The Atlantic, FN84)
122:
I don't think I've ever made more than one or two minor edits here, so I should be able to review neutrally. I have a few comments, some of them sort of piddly:
1714:
1392:
much debate in the media." Can reference this to Woolfe and Nack. FN140 - don't have access to the book. I found a few skeptical online sources to use though
40:
314:
1480:
Not entirely. Generally speaking, if things aren't actual publications they shouldn't be italicized. Examples include Arlington or Meadow Event Park.
1801:
30:
17:
1414:
puts it, if we take it out, they'll just put it back in), but at the same time express the doubt. For alternate sources, I first looked at wiki's
1170:
In "Belmont Stakes": In the quote box, I think no quotation marks are necessary, but a full stop (or three, if it's not the end of the sentence).
843:
miles? As a North American horse racing fan, I find the former odd, but if it's easier for non-horseracing people to understand, I'm all for it.
1783:
to highlight the duplicates). Also for the block quotes I think we can do without the {{prettyquote}} template and just use {{quote}}. Cheers,
142:
The background section uses an awful lot of parentheses, and some of the details, like the mares sent to be bred, can go outside parentheses.
1503:
FN46: news.google.com isn't the work, it's a republishing service - include the original source details, and then if you want to you can use
1094:
Yes, good. What do you think of putting the reference behind it, - or combine the two? I'd like people to read it note, more than the ref. --
757:"and the as-yet unborn 1970 foal of Somethingroyal; the latter foal turned out to be Secretariat"âcould it be just ", which turned out ..."?
1713:
Two remaining concerns on my side - some persisting italicized publishers (such as the two examples mentioned above), and I'm not sure that
1812:
1779:
There are quite a few duplinks in the article. I won't hold up promotion over them but pls review and see what you can do without (use
829:
see interspersed comments above. Should we also add meters when mentioning race distances? Do you think 9.5 furlongs reads better than
1831:
1792:
1759:
1745:
1726:
1708:
1687:
1672:
1656:
1639:
1489:
1432:
1404:
1299:
1281:
1261:
1239:
1218:
1203:
1188:
1150:
1117:
1103:
1089:
1078:
1037:
1007:
988:
974:
952:
937:
918:
896:
I added a "conversion of racing distances" chart (based on the one in the American Pharoah article) for the racing statistics section.
891:
852:
823:
654:
648:
629:
611:
574:
560:
546:
525:
511:
494:
There is no copyright notice on the statue. Below the sculptor's name and date on the base of the statue is one more line, cut off in
489:
475:
461:
447:
433:
388:
367:
341:
247:
231:
220:
199:
112:
87:
768:
Yes. It's also a widely used term in the horse business. ("Stands and nurses" is often the point at which stud fees become payable)
744:
that really doesn't scan right to me. Could replace "the spring of 1969" with the "the 1969 breeding season" if that reads better.
720:"had" just feels like a weak verb to me. Will change if it bothers you but "possessed" just seems more appropriate to me. *shrug*
1415:
309:
The base of the statue itself says "1974" in the image, so the original work is within the change in the law, but the statue
126:
The very first sentence in the lead is sort of a run-on, listing half the things he ever did. Is there a way to split it up?
424:
on the two screenshots? That will just leave the copyright expiration issue, which is complicated by the "republication".
158:
Is there a reason why it's written "honoured" in the part about the Canadian International? (Was it done intentionally?)
134:
The last line in the lead, the one about him being honored many years after his death, reads in a promotional way to me.
1573:
snort. removed since wasn't needed - everything was in the other source, but it was a very interesting article!
1515:
Retrieval dates aren't needed or useful for Google Books, but you should be consistent in whether you use them
379:
283:
File:Owner_Meadow_Stable.svg: can we include a source in the description to verify the accuracy of the design?
242:
226:
194:
1395:
Yes. I'm not sure that the sites added since the last review would qualify as high-quality reliable sources.
534:
1351:"The Sanford was the only race in his career in which Secretariat was not the betting favorite" - source?
1235:
1184:
1146:
1099:
1074:
1736:
at the Blood-Horse. True Nicks is both the name of his business and a column he writes for the magazine.
1591:
I went ahead and added paper name, even there, as for some reason all the papers are doing that... --MTBW
1663:
Some web sources include both access dates and publication dates, others do not - should be consistent.
1576:
As an aside, its primary value was that it had a photo of the horse. In case anyone doubted it... MTBW
885:
miles (1.9Â km) too if someone wants us to, but there does become a point at which it is pretty clunky.
374:
I answered further questions, let us know if there are further fixes! Thanks everyone for your reviews.
225:
It's fine now; hopefully we can get more reviews and get it to FA pretty soon. I'm ready to support it!
1287:
1780:
1755:
1733:
1722:
1668:
1635:
1485:
1400:
674:
Being new to this topic, I'm unused to seeing "he" and "who" used to refer to the horse; I guess so.
644:
570:
530:
471:
429:
337:
287:
72:
1805:
1445:
Sometimes you include "www" in website names, other times not - suggest consistently not doing so
1827:
1788:
1741:
1683:
1652:
1337:
1295:
1257:
1199:
1113:
984:
948:
848:
542:
507:
443:
363:
216:
93:
421:
295:
1419:
1410:
feel it necessary to include since its something that some people feel VERY strongly about (as
1314:
Might be worthwhile to source some of the superlatives in the lead, such as the "icon" phrase
1231:
1209:
1180:
1142:
1095:
1070:
607:
556:
521:
485:
414:
173:
61:
294:
File:1973_Kentucky_Derby_Secretariat.jpg: could you add something to the description about
150:
On Penny Chenery's quote in the Whitney Stakes section, the closing quote mark is missing.
1751:
1718:
1695:
1664:
1631:
1481:
1396:
1359:
1272:
1032:
1002:
969:
932:
818:
640:
625:
566:
467:
452:
425:
375:
333:
1804:
has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see
666:
on the lead and first few sections (disclosure: the nominator is a fellow member of the
1703:
1427:
1411:
1276:
1213:
1084:
913:
886:
865:
456:
383:
350:
326:
for his take on how we handle a copy where the original is in the public domain. âMTBW
107:
82:
1823:
1784:
1737:
1699:
1679:
1648:
1291:
1268:
1253:
1195:
1109:
980:
944:
844:
698:
538:
503:
439:
404:
395:
359:
212:
90:
53:
1494:
wiki markup automatically italicizes website= , so I'll change these back to xyz.com
682:
Isn't it an indictment on the Foundation's engeering and products division that we
603:
552:
537:
showing the reverse angle, no notice on it either. Original has identical wording.
517:
499:
481:
323:
498:, that reads "Gift of Paul Mellon to the National Museum of Racing at Saratoga".
1819:
1614:
FN138 should be converted to a template to match the rest of the book citations
57:
1025:
995:
962:
925:
907:
811:
636:
1702:: I think we have addressed everything. Is there anything we have missed?
495:
1083:
I added an endnote so as not to clutter the poem itself. Does that work?
355:
1252:
I think we still need a source review for formatting/reliability. Cheers,
802:"the latter"âisn't that applicable where there are two items? "the last"?
1547:
FN51 is italicizing date and shouldn't, and publication title is missing
1275:? Can you double check that images are now good and citations are OK?
1732:
newspapers. As for truenicks, it really is a very high quality source.
1598:
FN75 and 78 are to the same website so should have the same formatting
1358:
I fixed this to put a source in the note, the rest is simple analysis..
789:
Did you mean it would be better if we replaced the colon with a hyphen?
781:
first part FIXED by Jlvsclrk. Second part - not sure what the error is
639:, I looked at images and not citations here, is that what you meant?
420:
you prefer to the photo? Montana, could you add a quick statement re:
317:
of the 1974 original. As Jlvsclrk stated, s/he took the image. We
39:
Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in
773:
And in US English generally, we nurse our human babies too. --MTBW
628:
did a good job with that part of the review as she so often does.
1333:"equivalent to $ 7,019,357 in 2015" - per the note at the top of
1507:(but if you're going to, that should also be done consistently)
1458:
Find-A-Grave is not a high-quality reliable source, nor is IMDB
533:
to a picture that shows the full statue - no copyright notice. (
733:"wind up with" ... slightly informal, and twice in a sentence.
270:
FIXED by MTBW (large enough? It's 1.5x can go bigger if needed)
861:
We have the conversion table, we do a three-way conversion of
653:
Yes, my apologies. My brain tripped over an archived memory.
1606:
FN136: would make sense to cite the original source directly
1069:
Could you make this explanation part of the image caption? --
1420:
http://www.pedigreegoddess.com/PedigreeTheory/X%20Factor.htm
1286:
You can leave a note among the other requests at the top of
1570:
What makes ilovehorses.net a high-quality reliable source?
1531:- either is fine but again should be consistent. Same with
1379:
fixed (though seems to be a problem with the ISBN database)
1048:
Thank you for a spirited article on a wonderful creature!
1062:
The quoted poem is nice, but I don't see the connection.
1343:, not sure it's appropriate to have this unsourced here
961:, and says it's irrespective of the variety of English.
101:
This article is about the famous racehorse Secretariat,
1325:
should be italicized in article text (Belmont section)
65:
1346:
I'll just remove. not sure it adds anything. jlvsclrk
741:
I think MOS wants "In spring 1989", and "fall 1969".
1734:
Here's a link to various articles written by Porter
137:
FIXED by Jlvsclrk, and a few further tweaks by MTBW
1839:The above discussion is preserved as an archive.
241:ing this article in its run at FAC. Go, Big Red!
41:Knowledge (XXG) talk:Featured article candidates
1384:FN8 needs page number. Same with FN20, 57, 140
145:FIXED by Jlvsclrk (minor additional ce by MTBW)
43:. No further edits should be made to this page.
1845:No further edits should be made to this page.
1818:template in place on the talk page until the
689:I was wondering about that. FIXED by Jlvsclrk
29:The following is an archived discussion of a
8:
1271:? Seems the usual suspects aren't around (
18:Knowledge (XXG):Featured article candidates
1267:Any suggestions who we can ping for that,
912:: Have all your concerns been addressed?
1132:"croup" should be linked the first time.
959:"Fish are friends, not food", said Bruce.
1766:Anything else? Are we ready to promote?
1416:Circulatory_system_of_the_horse#X_factor
1212:I think we've addressed your concerns.
1622:FN151 has a doubled archival statement
551:Well, then I think the tag is proper.--
1560:
1556:
1555:AP should generally be credited using
1504:
1471:
1467:
958:
565:Fair enough, we'll go with that then.
275:Statue caption should end in a period
267:Suggest scaling up the anatomy photo
7:
1141:Need to go for now, more to come. --
765:"nursed" means "suckled", I guess.
717:"possessed" ... "had" wouldn't do?
24:
1422:- would this latter work better?
794:Autumn, or fall? We have both.
704:template sometimes helps. MTBW
118:Comments by White Arabian Filly
1647:working on it! See questions.
1290:if Nikki can't do it. Cheers,
989:03:09, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
975:02:48, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
953:23:28, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
938:23:08, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
919:22:56, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
892:22:56, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
853:19:18, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
824:07:18, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
655:03:11, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
649:01:56, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
630:20:21, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
612:17:31, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
575:01:56, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
561:17:31, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
547:15:32, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
526:15:00, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
512:14:44, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
490:12:34, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
476:23:00, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
462:18:37, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
448:02:10, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
434:01:30, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
389:18:58, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
368:05:19, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
342:23:30, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
248:20:16, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
232:21:00, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
221:05:19, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
200:21:18, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
113:20:29, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
88:20:29, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
1:
1542:think I got them all jlvsclrk
1368:Use a consistent date format
957:Jlv, MOS gives this example:
871:. We could add 9.5 furlongs
620:I figured it might be in the
211:Think I got the rest of them
1832:14:01, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
1793:14:00, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
1760:23:54, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
1746:04:33, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
1727:02:23, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
1709:02:06, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
1688:05:34, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
1673:01:35, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
1490:01:35, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
1433:17:41, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
1405:01:35, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
1179:That's all. Good reading! --
725:"In order to"âplease, "To".
1813:featured article candidates
1657:23:47, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
1640:12:16, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
1300:08:57, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
1282:08:41, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
1262:00:36, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
1240:22:55, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
1219:01:38, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
1204:03:09, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
1189:19:16, 1 October 2016 (UTC)
1151:16:57, 1 October 2016 (UTC)
1118:22:46, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
1104:06:52, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
1090:01:38, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
1079:07:07, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
1038:10:19, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
1008:07:01, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
677:Standard in the horse world
400:Could you add whichever of
356:picture of the original too
179:template does that. --MTBW
31:featured article nomination
1862:
1717:is a high-quality source.
1451:Fixed a couple more --MTBW
64:) 14:01, 22 October 2016
1842:Please do not modify it.
36:Please do not modify it.
1310:- spotchecks not done
924:words than necessary.
624:images but it appears
354:the article. I have a
169:Can't be helped, the
1194:See comments above.
1750:Okay, fair enough.
1044:Comments from Gerda
662:It's well-written.
380:White Arabian Filly
244:White Arabian Filly
228:White Arabian Filly
196:White Arabian Filly
73:Secretariat (horse)
1529:The New York Times
1523:Sometimes you use
1466:Check your use of
805:FIXED by Jlvsclrk
797:FIXED by Jlvsclrk
760:FIXED by Jlvsclrk
752:FIXED by Jlvsclrk
736:FIXED by Jlvsclrk
728:FIXED by Jlvsclrk
712:FIXED by Jlvsclrk
278:FIXED by Jlvsclrk
187:FIXED by Jlvsclrk
161:FIXED by Jlvsclrk
153:FIXED by Jlvsclrk
129:FIXED by Jlvsclrk
97:
1853:
1844:
1817:
1811:
1808:, and leave the
1706:
1625:now FN152. fixed
1562:
1558:
1506:
1473:
1469:
1430:
1342:
1336:
1279:
1226:Yes, thank you,
1216:
1173:FIXED - jlvsclrk
1135:FIXED - jlvsclrk
1087:
1035:
1030:
1005:
1000:
972:
967:
935:
930:
916:
911:
889:
884:
883:
879:
876:
870:
864:
842:
841:
837:
834:
821:
816:
703:
697:
459:
419:
413:
409:
403:
399:
386:
245:
229:
197:
178:
172:
110:
85:
79:
48:The article was
38:
1861:
1860:
1856:
1855:
1854:
1852:
1851:
1850:
1849:
1840:
1815:
1809:
1704:
1537:The Blood-Horse
1477:fixed jlvsclrk
1448:fixed jlvsclrk
1428:
1340:
1334:
1277:
1250:
1214:
1085:
1046:
1033:
1026:
1003:
996:
970:
963:
933:
926:
914:
905:
887:
881:
877:
874:
872:
868:
862:
839:
835:
832:
830:
819:
812:
701:
695:
457:
417:
411:
407:
401:
393:
384:
243:
227:
195:
176:
170:
120:
108:
83:
76:
34:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1859:
1857:
1848:
1847:
1835:
1834:
1822:goes through.
1778:
1777:
1776:
1775:
1774:
1773:
1772:
1771:
1770:
1769:
1768:
1767:
1692:
1691:
1690:
1661:
1660:
1659:
1629:
1628:
1627:
1626:
1620:
1619:
1618:
1612:
1611:
1610:
1609:changed source
1604:
1603:
1602:
1596:
1595:
1594:
1593:
1592:
1581:
1580:
1579:
1578:
1577:
1568:
1567:
1566:
1553:
1552:
1551:
1545:
1544:
1543:
1525:New York Times
1521:
1520:
1519:
1518:fixed jlvsclrk
1513:
1512:
1511:
1510:fixed jlvsclrk
1501:
1500:
1499:
1498:
1497:
1496:
1495:
1464:
1463:
1462:
1461:fixed jlvsclrk
1456:
1455:
1454:
1453:
1452:
1443:
1442:
1441:
1440:
1439:
1438:
1437:
1436:
1435:
1389:
1382:
1381:
1380:
1374:
1373:
1372:
1371:fixed jlvsclrk
1366:
1365:
1364:
1363:
1362:
1349:
1348:
1347:
1331:
1330:
1329:
1328:fixed jlvsclrk
1320:
1319:
1318:
1305:
1304:
1303:
1302:
1249:
1246:
1245:
1244:
1243:
1242:
1207:
1206:
1177:
1176:
1175:
1174:
1168:
1167:
1166:
1165:
1164:
1139:
1138:
1137:
1136:
1130:
1129:
1128:
1127:
1126:
1125:
1124:
1123:
1122:
1121:
1120:
1060:
1059:
1058:
1045:
1042:
1041:
1040:
1020:
1019:
1018:
1017:
1016:
1015:
1014:
1013:
1012:
1011:
1010:
902:
901:
900:
899:
898:
897:
856:
855:
809:
808:
807:
806:
800:
799:
798:
792:
791:
790:
784:
783:
782:
776:
775:
774:
770:
769:
763:
762:
761:
755:
754:
753:
749:as-yet-unborn
747:
746:
745:
739:
738:
737:
731:
730:
729:
723:
722:
721:
715:
714:
713:
707:
706:
705:
691:
690:
680:
679:
678:
664:A few comments
660:
659:
658:
657:
596:
595:
594:
593:
592:
591:
590:
589:
588:
587:
586:
585:
584:
583:
582:
581:
580:
579:
578:
577:
382:, pinging you
373:
372:
371:
370:
330:
329:
328:
327:
304:
303:
302:
292:
291:
290:
281:
280:
279:
273:
272:
271:
259:
258:
257:
256:
255:
254:
253:
252:
251:
250:
209:
191:
190:
189:
188:
182:
181:
180:
164:
163:
162:
156:
155:
154:
148:
147:
146:
140:
139:
138:
132:
131:
130:
119:
116:
99:
98:
81:Nominator(s):
75:
70:
69:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1858:
1846:
1843:
1837:
1836:
1833:
1829:
1825:
1821:
1814:
1807:
1803:
1799:
1796:
1795:
1794:
1790:
1786:
1782:
1765:
1764:
1763:
1762:
1761:
1757:
1753:
1749:
1748:
1747:
1743:
1739:
1735:
1730:
1729:
1728:
1724:
1720:
1716:
1712:
1711:
1710:
1707:
1701:
1697:
1693:
1689:
1685:
1681:
1676:
1675:
1674:
1670:
1666:
1662:
1658:
1654:
1650:
1646:
1645:
1644:
1643:
1642:
1641:
1637:
1633:
1624:
1623:
1621:
1616:
1615:
1613:
1608:
1607:
1605:
1600:
1599:
1597:
1590:
1589:
1586:
1585:
1582:
1575:
1574:
1572:
1571:
1569:
1564:
1563:
1554:
1549:
1548:
1546:
1541:
1540:
1538:
1534:
1530:
1526:
1522:
1517:
1516:
1514:
1509:
1508:
1502:
1493:
1492:
1491:
1487:
1483:
1479:
1478:
1476:
1475:
1465:
1460:
1459:
1457:
1450:
1449:
1447:
1446:
1444:
1434:
1431:
1424:
1423:
1421:
1417:
1413:
1408:
1407:
1406:
1402:
1398:
1394:
1393:
1390:
1386:
1385:
1383:
1378:
1377:
1375:
1370:
1369:
1367:
1361:
1357:
1356:
1353:
1352:
1350:
1345:
1344:
1339:
1332:
1327:
1326:
1324:
1321:
1316:
1315:
1313:
1312:
1311:
1309:
1308:Source review
1301:
1297:
1293:
1289:
1285:
1284:
1283:
1280:
1274:
1270:
1266:
1265:
1264:
1263:
1259:
1255:
1247:
1241:
1237:
1233:
1229:
1225:
1224:
1223:
1222:
1221:
1220:
1217:
1211:
1205:
1201:
1197:
1193:
1192:
1191:
1190:
1186:
1182:
1172:
1171:
1169:
1162:
1161:
1158:
1157:
1155:
1154:
1153:
1152:
1148:
1144:
1134:
1133:
1131:
1119:
1115:
1111:
1107:
1106:
1105:
1101:
1097:
1093:
1092:
1091:
1088:
1082:
1081:
1080:
1076:
1072:
1068:
1067:
1064:
1063:
1061:
1055:
1054:
1051:
1050:
1049:
1043:
1039:
1036:
1031:
1029:
1024:
1021:
1009:
1006:
1001:
999:
992:
991:
990:
986:
982:
978:
977:
976:
973:
968:
966:
960:
956:
955:
954:
950:
946:
941:
940:
939:
936:
931:
929:
922:
921:
920:
917:
909:
904:
903:
895:
894:
893:
890:
867:
860:
859:
858:
857:
854:
850:
846:
828:
827:
826:
825:
822:
817:
815:
804:
803:
801:
796:
795:
793:
788:
787:
785:
780:
779:
777:
772:
771:
767:
766:
764:
759:
758:
756:
751:
750:
748:
743:
742:
740:
735:
734:
732:
727:
726:
724:
719:
718:
716:
711:
710:
708:
700:
693:
692:
688:
687:
685:
681:
676:
675:
673:
672:
671:
669:
665:
656:
652:
651:
650:
646:
642:
638:
634:
633:
632:
631:
627:
623:
618:
614:
613:
609:
605:
600:
576:
572:
568:
564:
563:
562:
558:
554:
550:
549:
548:
544:
540:
536:
532:
531:Here's a link
529:
528:
527:
523:
519:
515:
514:
513:
509:
505:
501:
497:
493:
492:
491:
487:
483:
479:
478:
477:
473:
469:
465:
464:
463:
460:
454:
451:
450:
449:
445:
441:
437:
436:
435:
431:
427:
423:
416:
406:
397:
392:
391:
390:
387:
381:
377:
369:
365:
361:
357:
352:
348:
347:
346:
345:
344:
343:
339:
335:
325:
320:
316:
312:
308:
307:
305:
300:
299:
297:
293:
288:
286:Source added
285:
284:
282:
277:
276:
274:
269:
268:
266:
265:
264:
263:
249:
246:
240:
237:
236:
235:
234:
233:
230:
224:
223:
222:
218:
214:
210:
206:
205:
204:
203:
202:
201:
198:
186:
185:
183:
175:
168:
167:
165:
160:
159:
157:
152:
151:
149:
144:
143:
141:
136:
135:
133:
128:
127:
125:
124:
123:
117:
115:
114:
111:
106:Thank you.
104:
96:
95:
92:
91:User:Jlvsclrk
89:
86:
78:
77:
74:
71:
68:
66:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
37:
32:
27:
26:
19:
1841:
1838:
1798:Closing note
1797:
1630:
1536:
1532:
1528:
1527:, sometimes
1524:
1322:
1307:
1306:
1251:
1232:Gerda Arendt
1227:
1210:Gerda Arendt
1208:
1181:Gerda Arendt
1178:
1143:Gerda Arendt
1140:
1096:Gerda Arendt
1071:Gerda Arendt
1047:
1027:
1022:
997:
964:
927:
813:
810:
683:
667:
663:
661:
621:
616:
615:
598:
597:
331:
318:
313:a 1988 copy
310:
262:Image review
261:
260:
238:
192:
121:
103:Triple Crown
100:
80:
49:
47:
35:
28:
1781:this script
1533:Blood-Horse
1468:|publisher=
1323:Blood-Horse
535:Another pic
349:I'm hoping
1752:Nikkimaria
1719:Nikkimaria
1696:Nikkimaria
1665:Nikkimaria
1632:Nikkimaria
1482:Nikkimaria
1397:Nikkimaria
1360:Nikkimaria
1273:Nikkimaria
1248:Coord note
641:Nikkimaria
626:Nikkimaria
567:Nikkimaria
468:Nikkimaria
453:Nikkimaria
426:Nikkimaria
376:Nikkimaria
334:Nikkimaria
1806:WP:FAC/ar
1802:candidate
1705:Montanabw
1429:Montanabw
1412:montanabw
1338:inflation
1278:Montanabw
1215:Montanabw
1086:Montanabw
915:Montanabw
888:Montanabw
622:citations
458:Montanabw
385:Montanabw
351:Montanabw
109:Montanabw
84:Montanabw
1824:Ian Rose
1800:: This
1785:Ian Rose
1738:Jlvsclrk
1700:Ian Rose
1694:Pinging
1680:Jlvsclrk
1649:Jlvsclrk
1561:|author=
1557:|agency=
1388:follows)
1292:Ian Rose
1269:Ian Rose
1254:Ian Rose
1196:Jlvsclrk
1110:Jlvsclrk
1057:Jlvsclrk
981:Jlvsclrk
945:Jlvsclrk
845:Jlvsclrk
670:board).
668:Signpost
539:Jlvsclrk
504:Jlvsclrk
496:my image
440:Jlvsclrk
396:Jlvsclrk
360:Jlvsclrk
289:. --MTBW
213:Jlvsclrk
208:further.
54:Ian Rose
50:promoted
1228:support
1108:Done -
1034:(talk)
1023:Support
1004:(talk)
971:(talk)
934:(talk)
820:(talk)
617:Support
604:Wehwalt
602:done.--
599:Support
553:Wehwalt
518:Wehwalt
500:Wehwalt
482:Wehwalt
422:point 2
415:PD-self
324:Wehwalt
296:point 2
239:Support
174:convert
1539:, etc
1472:|work=
1288:WT:FAC
1163:OK now
635:Er...
315:source
58:FACBot
1601:fixed
1565:fixed
1550:fixed
1505:|via=
908:Tony1
866:hands
684:still
637:Atsme
319:could
16:<
1828:talk
1789:talk
1756:talk
1742:talk
1723:talk
1715:this
1698:and
1684:talk
1669:talk
1653:talk
1636:talk
1617:done
1559:not
1486:talk
1470:and
1401:talk
1296:talk
1258:talk
1236:talk
1230:! --
1200:talk
1185:talk
1147:talk
1114:talk
1100:talk
1075:talk
1028:Tony
998:Tony
985:talk
965:Tony
949:talk
928:Tony
849:talk
814:Tony
699:frac
694:The
645:talk
608:talk
571:talk
557:talk
543:talk
522:talk
508:talk
486:talk
472:talk
444:talk
430:talk
405:CC-0
364:talk
338:talk
217:talk
94:talk
62:talk
56:via
1820:bot
1535:vs
410:or
52:by
1830:)
1816:}}
1810:{{
1791:)
1758:)
1744:)
1725:)
1686:)
1671:)
1655:)
1638:)
1488:)
1403:)
1341:}}
1335:{{
1298:)
1260:)
1238:)
1202:)
1187:)
1149:)
1116:)
1102:)
1077:)
987:)
951:)
882:16
869:}}
863:{{
851:)
840:16
702:}}
696:{{
647:)
610:)
573:)
559:)
545:)
524:)
510:)
488:)
474:)
446:)
432:)
418:}}
412:{{
408:}}
402:{{
378:,
366:)
340:)
332:â
311:is
219:)
177:}}
171:{{
67:.
33:.
1826:(
1787:(
1754:(
1740:(
1721:(
1682:(
1667:(
1651:(
1634:(
1484:(
1399:(
1294:(
1256:(
1234:(
1198:(
1183:(
1145:(
1112:(
1098:(
1073:(
983:(
947:(
910::
906:@
880:â
878:3
875:+
873:1
847:(
838:â
836:3
833:+
831:1
643:(
606:(
569:(
555:(
541:(
520:(
506:(
484:(
470:(
442:(
428:(
398::
394:@
362:(
336:(
215:(
193:â
60:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.