959:- Glad to see some of the earlier quibbles have died down, and that this nomination is being considered on its merits. I looked at the article when it was a GA candidate, and am happy to see it continue to improve. My only concern is this: I think the lead needs a complete rewrite. I think my opinion is somewhat in line with Resurgent's suggestion that the "1am" item be removed from the lead, and also with the "journalistic vs. encyclopedic" question. Essentially, the lead should be more of an overview of the historical significance of the event: why is it famous, why is it notable, what values clashed to instigate the riot, etc. There is plenty of room for a timeline elsewhere in the article; the lead should be written more along the lines of "Neighbors of the park, regarding the political activists and homeless people who increasingly congregated there as a nuisance, pressured the police to impose a curfew. When the police attempted to enforce the curfew, riots ensued, lasting for several days." (Note: I doubt my sentence is accurate, I include it only for a sample of the tone I think the lead should adopt.) Basically, including too many timeline details, before establishing a foundation of what was at stake, makes the article less readable. -
1309:, though it's fixable (but not within the context of this nomination). I was going to write a long critique here, since I printed it out and went through it with a red pen and found myself using it a lot. Alabamaboy has said many of the same things I was going to, most notably that this just leaves you hanging as to what the long term legacy of the riots were other than a concert a couple of years ago, as well as the residual POV from the source material (there is an attempt to be fair to the police, but phrasing like "what ubiquitous media images made clear" still smacks of an agenda (as well as being inherently subjective ... ubiquitous? to whom? Made clear? To whom?). I would also cite an intro that starts out OK, suddenly gets too detailed and then realizes where it's going and tries to get back in line. Also missing until way too far down, as Alabamaboy is also pointing out, is a context ... we read all the time about Tompkins Square Park being important to the homeless and the down-and-out, but only near the end is it made clear that this was seen by the protesters in the context of the increasing gentrification of Manhattan at the time (It's also not a clear connection to jump from the 1874 riots to the 1980s so swiftly).
1290:. The entire article is one-sided. Even though the police actions were over the top, the protestors were not innocent. Yet the article doesn't mention anyone condemning the actions of the protestors. The article also contains too many unsourced POV sentences like "Contingents of the homeless and rowdy youth had nearly taken over the park" and "Though the park had already become a de facto homeless shelter and the general public virtually barred from using the park by anarchists supporting the rights of these homeless, some residents considered it an attempt to take the park away from the public" and "A neighborhood divided over their feelings about police were united against their aggression." Finally, what was the long-term effect of the riot? Did the neighborhood gentrify? Is the park now used by families or still controlled by the homeless and drug addicts? If the park and community has changed, how and why? Instead of putting the riot into perspective, the article merely closes with the short sections on music and the anniversary concerts. But I know there was a long-term reaction to the riots b/c the article
229:, which recommends links not be repeated in the "see also" section when they are already included elsewhere in the article. Also, I think referencing can be improved. For example, "The Civilian Complaint Review Board recommended the officers be charged, and Commissioner Ward endorsed the recommendations." is not cited. The number of references (11 different newspaper articles) used in the article may also be insufficient. The article may benefit from additional references, from more diverse sources.
70:(self-nomination)This article is simply excellent. Excellent writing, interesting subject matter, improved during its Good Article trial, and eye-witnesses have left notes on the Talk page that talk about the article being so accurate, it's like they were living it all over again. Written in a NPOV and heavily cited with the highest of sources, it includes GFDL media, is wikified to the fullest, a fantastic "See Also" section, and looks at the story from every angle. --
1127:
decision was unequivocal. Days after the vote, parks workers painted a warning on the ground: Tompkins Square would close at 1 A.M. On July 11, a contingent of Ninth
Precinct police evicted all but the homeless, whom they confined to the southeast quadrant. The park was closed periodically over the next two weeks. The actions were directed by Capt. Gerald F. McNamara, who some residents say gave the noise problem a higher priority than his predecessors had.
947:- I cannot comment on the compelling nature of the prose, as I am useless with that a kind of thing, but having now fixed the references and the lead, I think this article is good to pass as long as the sentence 'Captain McNamara countered, "We did everything in our power not to provoke an incident. They didn't charge the crowd until the bricks and bottles started flying."' is referenced.
885:
responsible for the riot, the press agreed, and so did the public and the evidence from that night--I guess for some the very notion doesn't sit well). But giving these sorts of specific examples will not only help me in knowing how to improve this article, but future articles. I appreciate the time and consideration you paid. --
681:, a recently promoted FA. Again, I think the key thing that will help bring the article to where it needs to be is more (diverse) sources. Newspaper articles don't necessarily give a historic perspective, but are talking about the event as news (here and now) with the many quotes. Additional sources can help change the tone. --
1171:- "If a date includes both a month and a day, then the date should almost always be linked to allow readers' date preferences to work, displaying the reader's chosen format. The day and the month should be linked together, and the year should be linked separately if present." Where is this not done in the article?
1210:
Lastly, the similarities between the New York Times articles and TSP article: There are only so many ways to re-state facts. It is not "re-telling the NYT story" but re-stating the facts that they reported. If you have suggestions, or want to take a crack at creative prose that re-states a factual
1082:
Additional neutrality concern about article title: should it be "Police Riot" or just "riots"? And why is Police Riot capitalized? Is there a well-sourced justification for referring to the police action as a "Riot", in the title no less? This article needs to be seriously reviewed for neutrality,
1032:
Awkward prose: the first sentence in the article body dives into undefined
History. Since the Tompkins Square Riot of 1874, the park has been a symbolic place for the New York labor movement. The section is labeled "Background" (not a particularly encyclopedic heading), but doesn't give background
1231:
I think SandyGeorgia raises some important points, and I'm going to do some work on addressing them. I don't think SG intended to call DSB out as having repackaged content with any intent to deceive, but speaking for myself, it's quite clear to me that DSB's desire has been to create a comprehensive
1220:
the article and thus I shouldn't be expected to be the only one working to improve it, and many of your suggestions revolve around minutia best handled by the person who spots it, rather than telling someone else to do it, in my opinion. I don't mean that to sound harsh, but I feel a little weighed
1135:
In a binding vote, the board's members approved a report on the park that recommended a 1 a.m. curfew on June 28, 1988. Some residents complained that it was passed with little discussion and that some board members were not aware that the park would be closed. But board manager Martha
Danziger said
1136:
the decision was explicit for all. On July 11, police evicted all but the homeless, whom they confined to the southeast corner, and then closed the park down periodically over the next two weeks. This was accomplished under the direction of
Captain Gerald McNamara, the commander of the 9th Precinct.
844:"New York Times photographer Angel Franco saw the police beat a couple who emerged from a grocery store. As he tried to take photographs, an officer clubbed Franco." - Franco was trying to take photographs of the assault on the couple, right? If so, these sentences should be linked with a semicolon.
528:
The references section is quite unorthodox. Either have the full citation in separate bullet points and use MLA citation in the notes, or go all the way with each note. There are a couple linked years (which shouldn't be), and the August 6 heading link is a violation of MoS. Also, it doesn't really
1108:
Moreover, the handful of groups that each claim to represent the community's true interests have bickered over how to handle the park. A group called
Friends of Tompkins Square Park favored a laissez-faire approach, while the Avenue A Block Association demanded a curfew. Community Board 3 took the
1126:
At the board's meeting June 28, members approved a report which included a recommendation for a 1 A.M. curfew. Some now complain that it was passed with little discussion and without awareness by some members that the park would actually be closed. But Martha
Danziger, the board manager, said the
257:
I would agree on the more diverse sources angle. The article is certainly better than a GA, but not quite at an FA yet I don't think. I'd agree on cutting down the 'see also' section slightly. I've made a few minor alterations, feel free to revert them. Maybe a map of the immediate area would be
1294:
mentions the park was closed for a year after the riots and that "Increasing gentrification in the East
Village during the 1990s and 2000s, as well as enforcement of a park curfew and the eviction of homeless people, have changed the character of Tompkins Square Park." Yet this article fails to
1117:
A volunteer group, Friends of
Tompkins Square Park, did not mind the park in this state. However, the Avenue A Block Association, comprised of local businesses, insisted on a curfew to evict the squatters in the park. Manhattan Community Board 3 tried to take the middle ground, but political
884:
Thanks for this. These are exactly the sort of concrete examples I had hoped to received to improve the article. Most editors are providing these; however, some just appear to have a problem with the topic and the reality (after all, the police commissioner himself admitted the police were
1104:
Switching to Strong Oppose after purchasing the NYT articles. The NYT does not use the word "anarchist", so that appears to be POV inserted by the author. A lot of this article is just a re-phrasing of the main NYT article used to source the article. The NYT article says, for example:
1199:
Providing sources for some of the estimates is fine, but I also didn't want to over-cite. I can go back into Lexis and look for the police estimates and link to the number if you feel this important. I didn't originally cite it because I didn't think it was a particularly contentious
1211:
statement, such as "The park was closed periodically over the next two weeks. The actions were directed by Capt. Gerald F. McNamara, who some residents say gave the noise problem a higher priority than his predecessors had" then I welcome the lesson in how it is done.
925:
Good to see that user gone, at least for a while. Anyway, as promised, I'm willing to help some with the article (with some sources not available on Google), but also want to see what you can do with it. I think you should be fine in addressing much of the concerns.
607:
During a lull in the riot, a young officer on
Patterson's video appealed for understanding from the protesters. He tried to calmly tell them how unhappy the police were with the assignment and its aftermath. "We've got cops back there in ambulances who've been hit."
395:"Tompkins Square Riot" is the specific wording that came up most often in book and other searches for the 1874 riot, though it also brings up results for the 1988 riot. The title for the 1988 riot looks good. What do you think the disambiguation page be called,
1273:
Anybody who's following, please take a look and see if I've managed to balance these concerns adequately. If so, I will try to take on some other sections…I suppose I may need to buy the relevant articles myself, but it seems worth it for a few bucks.
1187:
the article) than telling me to do them. Again, I appreciate the effort, but this article belongs to all of us and I have no vested interest or movie rights in seeing it promoted, except for a sense of satisfaction. Back to addressing your issues:
1215:
Since you own the NYT Article, you are now one of the better people to make some of these changes that you suggest and recommend. I have no problem working on this piece with you, but as was pointed out at the beginning of the thread, I don't
1042:
Though the park had already become a de facto homeless shelter and the general public virtually barred from using the park by anarchists supporting the rights of these homeless, ... Is "anarchists" the word used in the source? Please provide
293:
1232:
article from the beginning. It takes work to retell a story effectively, and clearly there is more work here to be done; but that's why FA is such a valuable process. I'll be back soon to work more on this…off to an appointment now. -
1178:
One issue I have with your suggestions is that they are pedantic, for instance, the wiki-linking and begin to read like my high school composition teacher correcting a paper. Instead of expending keystrokes telling me to de-wikify
1028:
Define acronyms the first time they are used: ... and the New York Police
Department (NYPD) for their candor in a report that confirmed what ubiquitous media images made clear: the NYPD were responsible for inciting a riot. (fix
634:
Wait, you strongly oppose because you think I plagiarized?! How in the world is this good faith? Seems like bad faith to me. Pull the articles, if you must. That's why they are cited. And some of your emphasis is with
295:
667:
I don't understand how journalistic, "Just the facts" style is unencyclopedic. Can you please point to me some style guide that points out the differences? How else does an encyclopedia entry on an historical event
742:
sticking point, it seems appropriate for the lead. It was essentially the match that lit the fire. I don't think it's a big issue one way or another, but let me know if you think this is a major sticking point.
291:
1311:
Sticking out as well are sentences like "those on the verge of imminent collapse". From what? Was the park some sort of treatment center for heat exhaustion? It could be argued based on that sentence that the
648:
You misunderstand me, I strongly oppose because the style of the article sounds like a news story, ie. unencylopedic. The copying thing is a side issue which like I said, has a small chance of being true. --
353:
as the 1988 riot. Also, some users may just search "Tompkins Square Riot" or something similar without the year. Disambiguation would help users. And, yes we now do have an article about the 1874 riot -
585:- The article reads very much like a newspaper/journal story, and I weakly suspect it might have just been copied from somewhere. Examples of journalistic style (emphasis mine, to illustrate the point):
327:
where the other was a labor riot (I believe)? There also isn't an article for the 1874 riot, and there were a few other riots as well in the park. Do we disambiguate when no other articles exist? --
1063:
The informal prose and unencyclopedic tone is a concern, as well as the MOS and formatting issues and the need for a copyedit. The article doesn't appear to have a neutral, encyclopedic tone.
1221:
down by so many pedantic suggestions. To be honest, if trying to bring an article to FA status entails my needing to be told to dot every i, and cross every t, then this will be my last. --
841:'Captain McNamara countered, "We did everything in our power not to provoke an incident. They didn't charge the crowd until the bricks and bottles started flying."' - unsourced quotation.
1320:'s troubles prior to the riot gone before I vote in favor ... it belongs in the article about him, not here, and this one can just generally allude to them without going into specifics.
1246:
SandyGeorgia, since you have the complete NYT article and I don't, if you have time to do any double-checking of my rewrites, it would be much appreciated. I'm gonna work on it now. -
1323:
David, I do have a list of specific examples besides these, but I will put it on the talk page (not right now; when I have the time) since I believe that's a better place for them.
151:
so let's assume I don't think, as a very accomplished editor well familiar with Wiki guidelines, that I own it. Look at actions, fellas, and not a one word indictment. Thanks. --
232:
602:
He dismissed questions about the seemingly excessive police numbers. "We don't want to get into a situation where we under-police something like this and it turns into a fiasco."
1049:"ripped open old wounds about brutality"? Doesn't seem like encyclopedic prose, and doesn't seem neutral. Are those the exact words used in the source? Please provide quote.
1036:
Redundant prose, sample: Contingents of the homeless and rowdy youth had nearly taken over the park, but the neighborhood was divided about what should be done, if anything.
847:"the riot became a cause to reflect on the negative aspects of his record" - "became a cause" is rather awkward. I cannot think of a way to rework this without introducing
230:
1369:
These are random examples from the top that indicate the need for a full copy-edit. I like the article, but it's not ready for promotion until the writing glistens.
758:", "another rally for August 6th" - inconsistent date formatting. Per MOSDATE dates consisting of day and month should be wikilinked, with no prefix after the day.
639:. Yes, I did not re-word quotes. It's bizarre to use a line of reasoning that boils down to, "he writes like a journalist, so he must be violating copyright." --
1268:
an encyclopedia should give more of a "bird's eye view"; details that may have been politically relevant in 1988 may have no relevance to a historical overview.
1387:
559:
Originally when I wrote it, I used legal citation. Links aren't a problem to remove. Navbox - not sure what would be appropriate, but open to suggestion. --
47:
349:
I think it is necessary, and not that difficult to do. The 1874 riot involved police suppressing a labor demonstration, which equally fits the definition of
1058:
Although bottles reportedly flew, it was the police who charged the crowd. (according to whom?) Attribution is needed on statements like this, and others.
1164:
Sandy, first I very much appreciate the time and effort you put into reading and researching the article. It was a big a help. A few issues, though:
1373:
1327:
1299:
1278:
1250:
1236:
1225:
1158:
1095:
1075:
963:
951:
937:
917:
905:
889:
873:
826:
817:
793:
784:
768:
747:
724:
692:
672:
662:
643:
629:
575:
563:
554:
542:
514:
490:
474:
461:
443:
426:
386:
369:
340:
331:
312:
274:
265:
249:
209:
185:
155:
138:
127:
110:
74:
37:
17:
415:
would work, since searching that specific term brings up the most results on Google web and book searches. The other redlinks can be redirects. --
379:
731:"a newly-passed 01:00 curfew" - in the lead, I'd rather not be so specific as to mention the curfew's timing, and the time is mis-formatted per
922:
600:"It's time to bring a little law and order back to the park and restore it to the legitimate members of the community," said Captain McNamara.
23:
612:
A witness said the mob rammed a police barricade through the glass door of the Christodora House, a high-rise luxury building on Avenue B.
119:
It would be helpful since you feel so strongly to give some reasons for why you are strongly opposed. And I don't need to be reminded of
1183:(which I didn't wikify), just de-wikify it and collaborate. Many of the minor things would have been better undertaken by you (I don't
901:, David is an excellent writer and I believe that he will clear up all of the minor niks mentioned above before this consensus ends.
400:
64:
1356:"The Avenue A Block Association (comprised of local businesses) demanded a curfew"—As DCGeist recently taught me, "composed of".
678:
1344:
Reference 1: alphabet soup of inconsistent upper- and lower-case initials in the title. Check through all references for this.
913:: Sunday I plan to turn my attention (and Lexis account) on this article to make some of the suggested improvements (FYI). --
1353:"the park was a gathering place for scores of drunken rock fans and their boisterous street parties"—street parties gather?
802:
works. Don't strike out anything, but instead allow the reviewer to do that. Even that's not entirely necessary, because
1146:
Problem with simply re-telling the NYT story in unencyclopedic tone, with sourcing problems and possible POV insertions.
711:. I wanted to write "support" to counter the quibbles over article naming, "WP:OWN", and "copyvio", but I cannot because:
132:
It doesn't matter if it's a self-nomination, that does not automatically make the article yours, or allow such claims. --
1109:
middle ground, while political organizers on the poorer east side of the park favored protest aimed at keeping it open.
226:
1046:
What is this date formatting in this source? ^ The Villager, Leftöver Crack fires up punks, August 9 August 15, 2006.
404:
355:
287:
298:
714:
The lead does not summarise the article well (almost all of it covers only the action before and during the riot).
104:
396:
870:
1013:. Common terms are not linked, terms relevant to the article should be linked on the first occurrence only.
995:
235:
1347:"Over 100 complaints of police brutality "—well, it might have ended this way, so use "More than 100 ...".
1313:
1154:
1091:
1071:
143:
This is really far too much consideration and attention paid to casual wording that was not meant to show
789:
Strikeout, then? If not that, there should be some way to determine when things have been completed. --
83:
I dont think this article is anywhere near the featured article status, I think it could qualify for the
467:
99:
1296:
1291:
1014:
436:
412:
408:
1359:"preferred that curfew be imposed; and Manhattan Community Board 3 tried to take the middle ground"—
1052:
150 or 200 (police estimates were 700) (which is it according to the source? Please provide quote).
1010:
994:
No consistent style used in formatting references, no idea which style is supposedly employed. See
869:
Overall a good look into a fascinating incident in NY's history, but these serious problems linger.
859:
732:
1222:
914:
886:
823:
790:
765:
744:
721:
669:
656:
640:
623:
560:
551:
511:
471:
440:
383:
337:
328:
271:
206:
182:
152:
133:
124:
71:
1168:
976:
848:
999:
1147:
1084:
1064:
902:
198:
1204:
1324:
1275:
1247:
1233:
1141:
The article is used to source the 700 protestors number, but doesn't mention the 700 number.
960:
851:, and the rest of the paragraph wouldn't hurt if you just dropped this part of the sentence.
1217:
1184:
1006:
982:
148:
144:
120:
88:
572:
537:
336:
Also, is disambiguation and separate article creation necessary for FA for this article?--
262:
202:
529:
matter, but without a navbox I get the feeling this is a rather dead-end/lonely article.
234:
I may be able to offer some help in this regard. Also, in the future, I don't recommend
84:
932:
812:
779:
687:
650:
617:
485:
456:
421:
364:
307:
244:
1317:
589:
The police attempted to enforce a newly-passed 01:00 curfew for the park, which had
439:
with REDIRECTS to that page for the other titles you mention. What do you think? --
803:
593:
by the homeless, drug dealers, addicts and youthful followers of punk rock music.
147:- let's assume a little good faith, shall we? I don't treat the article as if I
948:
350:
323:
1370:
773:
I suggest not using the green check marks. Some people find them annoying. --
569:
530:
259:
1055:
The police were there to meet the protesters. (What does this sentence add?)
1207:
in changing if you don't care for them, instead of hashing out minutia here.
927:
807:
774:
682:
480:
451:
416:
359:
302:
239:
123:- I think that's an unnecessary comment for a "self-nomination" article. --
24:
Knowledge (XXG):Featured article candidates/Tompkins Square Park Police Riot
1295:
mention this and fails to place the riots into any historic perspective. --
1025:
are also linked. These are samples only; the entire text should be fixed.
1363:
curfew? And they didn't take the middle ground, they just tried to do so?
1262:
keeping the article too close to the NYT article would violate copyright.
1259:
In editing the "Background" section, I tried to balance three concerns:
297:
Thus, the year needs to be included somewhere in the article title, and
988:
755:
378:
Just noticed that you created it. Kudos to you. So should we call in
194:
610:
But the lull ended. Thirty to seventy protesters re-entered the park.
1386:
Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in
87:
status but certainly not FA, also; may I remind you that you do not
46:
Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in
1118:
organizers for the poor favored protest to keep it open all night.
568:
Do we have a Riot box? or Infobox Riot? Should one be created? -
1180:
1022:
1018:
1002:
if you don't have a preferred style or know how to format refs.
1350:"ubiquitous media images"—It's not an overstatement, is it?
1203:
What sentences add, etc. is more something that you should
1017:
is re-linked in the last section, while common terms like
862:. Please replace the italics with a pair of single quotes.
979:
on dates, month-day combos and full dates are wikilinked.
382:- I think 1874 it was not yet a park, just a square. --
1193:
93:
1265:
changing the text too much compromises its accuracy.
1039:
the park used throughout, should it be capitalized?
1380:The above discussion is preserved as an archive.
1316:finished there. I also want to see the litany of
1388:Knowledge (XXG) talk:Featured article candidates
466:Actually, maybe the main page should be plural,
48:Knowledge (XXG) talk:Featured article candidates
1390:. No further edits should be made to this page.
822:I suppose a bolded Done works just as well. --
50:. No further edits should be made to this page.
1341:MOS says space the en dash between full dates.
854:"and they're standing in the street screaming
598:The police were there to meet the protesters.
286:Tompkins Square Park was also the location of
201:synopsis on the report recommendations, and a
36:The following is an archived discussion of a
8:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Featured article candidates
1083:considering some of the responses below.
1338:—2 (Manual of style issues), 1a (prose).
1192:"Anarchists" - I didn't use this terms,
973:, problems with 2, 1a, 1c, possibly 1d.
227:Knowledge (XXG):Guide_to_layout#See_also
806:will look to see if things are done. --
380:Tompkins Square Park Police Riot (1988)
225:The see also section needs work. See
91:the article per the section header of
7:
205:Koch quote. Is this sufficient? --
193:- I've added four new sources - Two
508:DONE - Disambiguation and page move
858:" - misapplication of italics per
321:Is that necessary since this is a
31:
1005:Problems with wikilinking. See
998:or you could consider using the
401:Tompkins Square Park Police Riot
238:user talk pages with the FAC. --
65:Tompkins Square Park Police Riot
1174:Headings - what do you suggest?
1:
798:Simply just saying "Done" or
738:Since the curfew's time was
679:École Polytechnique massacre
405:Tompkins Square Police Riot
356:Tompkins Square Riot (1874)
38:featured article nomination
1407:
270:Good suggestions, all. --
1374:08:31, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
1328:03:14, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
1300:13:53, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
397:Tompkins Square Park Riot
1383:Please do not modify it.
1279:03:03, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
1251:02:20, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
1237:21:52, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
1226:15:20, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
1159:04:09, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
1096:15:26, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
1076:03:48, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
964:21:58, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
952:14:20, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
938:05:26, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
918:05:16, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
906:20:59, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
890:14:57, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
874:14:31, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
827:17:59, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
818:17:52, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
794:17:11, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
785:17:02, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
769:16:42, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
748:16:42, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
725:16:42, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
693:14:14, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
673:14:02, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
663:14:00, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
644:12:54, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
630:11:31, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
576:11:05, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
564:04:10, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
555:14:07, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
543:03:45, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
515:14:12, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
491:21:45, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
475:21:15, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
462:21:12, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
444:21:07, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
427:20:48, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
387:20:30, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
370:20:27, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
341:20:23, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
332:20:18, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
313:20:14, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
275:04:10, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
266:21:31, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
250:19:45, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
210:14:10, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
186:14:10, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
156:04:07, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
139:22:24, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
128:19:14, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
111:19:09, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
75:15:53, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
43:Please do not modify it.
591:been all but taken over
1314:New York City Marathon
707:Unfortunate but firm
479:That sounds right. --
468:Tompkins Square Riots
290:on January 13, 1874.
59:18:01, 19 June 2007.
1292:Tompkins Square Park
1015:Tompkins Square Park
437:Tompkins Square Riot
413:Tompkins Square Riot
409:Tompkins Square Riot
97:. Kindest Regards —
1132:This article says:
1114:This article says:
871:Resurgent insurgent
754:"rally called for
450:That will work. --
435:I agree with you,
136:
1244:Followup comment:
936:
816:
783:
691:
489:
460:
425:
368:
311:
248:
199:Los Angeles Times
134:
22:(Redirected from
1398:
1385:
1151:
1088:
1068:
930:
810:
777:
685:
659:
653:
626:
620:
540:
535:
483:
454:
419:
362:
305:
242:
109:
96:
55:The article was
45:
27:
1406:
1405:
1401:
1400:
1399:
1397:
1396:
1395:
1394:
1381:
1223:David Shankbone
1149:
1086:
1066:
991:as a See also ?
915:David Shankbone
903:Tony the Marine
887:David Shankbone
824:David Shankbone
791:David Shankbone
766:David Shankbone
745:David Shankbone
722:David Shankbone
677:Take a look at
670:David Shankbone
657:
651:
641:David Shankbone
624:
618:
561:David Shankbone
552:David Shankbone
538:
531:
512:David Shankbone
472:David Shankbone
441:David Shankbone
384:David Shankbone
338:David Shankbone
329:David Shankbone
272:David Shankbone
207:David Shankbone
203:Washington Post
183:David Shankbone
153:David Shankbone
125:David Shankbone
98:
92:
72:David Shankbone
68:
41:
29:
28:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1404:
1402:
1393:
1392:
1367:
1366:
1365:
1364:
1357:
1354:
1351:
1348:
1345:
1342:
1332:
1331:
1303:
1302:
1284:
1283:
1282:
1281:
1271:
1270:
1269:
1266:
1263:
1254:
1253:
1240:
1239:
1213:
1212:
1208:
1201:
1197:
1176:
1175:
1172:
1162:
1161:
1144:
1143:
1142:
1139:
1138:
1137:
1130:
1129:
1128:
1123:The NYT says:
1121:
1120:
1119:
1112:
1111:
1110:
1099:
1098:
1079:
1078:
1061:
1060:
1059:
1056:
1053:
1050:
1047:
1044:
1040:
1037:
1034:
1033:on that event.
1030:
1026:
1003:
1000:cite templates
992:
986:
980:
967:
966:
954:
942:
941:
940:
908:
896:
895:
894:
893:
892:
877:
876:
866:
865:
864:
863:
856:Kill the pigs!
852:
845:
842:
839:
838:
837:
836:
835:
834:
833:
832:
831:
830:
829:
752:
751:
750:
729:
728:
727:
705:
704:
703:
702:
701:
700:
699:
698:
697:
696:
695:
614:
604:
595:
580:
579:
578:
566:
557:
522:
521:
520:
519:
518:
517:
504:
503:
502:
501:
500:
499:
498:
497:
496:
495:
494:
493:
447:
446:
430:
429:
390:
389:
373:
372:
344:
343:
334:
316:
315:
301:is needed. --
299:disambiguation
281:
280:
279:
278:
277:
219:
218:
217:
216:
215:
214:
213:
212:
188:
165:
164:
163:
162:
161:
160:
159:
158:
77:
67:
62:
61:
53:
52:
32:
30:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1403:
1391:
1389:
1384:
1378:
1377:
1376:
1375:
1372:
1362:
1358:
1355:
1352:
1349:
1346:
1343:
1340:
1339:
1337:
1334:
1333:
1330:
1329:
1326:
1321:
1319:
1318:Benjamin Ward
1315:
1308:
1305:
1304:
1301:
1298:
1293:
1289:
1288:Strong oppose
1286:
1285:
1280:
1277:
1272:
1267:
1264:
1261:
1260:
1258:
1257:
1256:
1255:
1252:
1249:
1245:
1242:
1241:
1238:
1235:
1230:
1229:
1228:
1227:
1224:
1219:
1209:
1206:
1202:
1198:
1195:
1191:
1190:
1189:
1186:
1182:
1173:
1170:
1167:
1166:
1165:
1160:
1156:
1152:
1145:
1140:
1134:
1133:
1131:
1125:
1124:
1122:
1116:
1115:
1113:
1107:
1106:
1103:
1102:
1101:
1100:
1097:
1093:
1089:
1081:
1080:
1077:
1073:
1069:
1062:
1057:
1054:
1051:
1048:
1045:
1041:
1038:
1035:
1031:
1027:
1024:
1020:
1016:
1012:
1008:
1004:
1001:
997:
993:
990:
987:
984:
981:
978:
975:
974:
972:
971:Strong Oppose
969:
968:
965:
962:
958:
955:
953:
950:
946:
943:
939:
934:
929:
924:
921:
920:
919:
916:
912:
909:
907:
904:
900:
897:
891:
888:
883:
882:
881:
880:
879:
878:
875:
872:
868:
867:
861:
857:
853:
850:
846:
843:
840:
828:
825:
821:
820:
819:
814:
809:
805:
801:
797:
796:
795:
792:
788:
787:
786:
781:
776:
772:
771:
770:
767:
763:
760:
759:
757:
753:
749:
746:
741:
737:
736:
734:
730:
726:
723:
719:
716:
715:
713:
712:
710:
706:
694:
689:
684:
680:
676:
675:
674:
671:
666:
665:
664:
661:
660:
654:
647:
646:
645:
642:
638:
637:direct quotes
633:
632:
631:
628:
627:
621:
616:etc, etc. --
615:
613:
611:
605:
603:
601:
596:
594:
592:
587:
586:
584:
583:Strong oppose
581:
577:
574:
571:
570:Francis Tyers
567:
565:
562:
558:
556:
553:
549:
546:
545:
544:
541:
536:
534:
527:
524:
523:
516:
513:
509:
506:
505:
492:
487:
482:
478:
477:
476:
473:
469:
465:
464:
463:
458:
453:
449:
448:
445:
442:
438:
434:
433:
432:
431:
428:
423:
418:
414:
410:
406:
402:
398:
394:
393:
392:
391:
388:
385:
381:
377:
376:
375:
374:
371:
366:
361:
357:
352:
348:
347:
346:
345:
342:
339:
335:
333:
330:
326:
325:
320:
319:
318:
317:
314:
309:
304:
300:
296:
294:
292:
289:
285:
282:
276:
273:
269:
268:
267:
264:
261:
260:Francis Tyers
256:
253:
252:
251:
246:
241:
237:
233:
231:
228:
224:
221:
220:
211:
208:
204:
200:
196:
192:
189:
187:
184:
180:
178:
173:
172:
171:
170:
169:
168:
167:
166:
157:
154:
150:
146:
142:
141:
140:
137:
131:
130:
129:
126:
122:
118:
117:
116:
115:
114:
113:
112:
108:
107:
103:
102:
95:
90:
86:
82:
81:Strong Oppose
76:
73:
66:
63:
60:
58:
51:
49:
44:
39:
34:
33:
25:
19:
1382:
1379:
1368:
1360:
1335:
1322:
1310:
1306:
1287:
1243:
1214:
1177:
1163:
970:
956:
944:
910:
898:
855:
804:User:Raul654
799:
761:
739:
717:
708:
655:
636:
622:
609:
606:
599:
597:
590:
588:
582:
547:
532:
525:
507:
322:
288:another riot
283:
254:
222:
197:articles, a
190:
181:section. --
176:
174:
105:
101:The Sunshine
100:
94:this comment
85:good article
80:
78:
69:
57:not promoted
56:
54:
42:
35:
1325:Daniel Case
1194:some IP did
1029:throughout)
411:? I think
351:Police riot
324:Police riot
1297:Alabamaboy
1011:WP:CONTEXT
996:WP:CITE/ES
985:, headings
860:WP:ITALICS
733:WP:MOSDATE
236:canvassing
1169:WP:MOSNUM
977:WP:MOSNUM
756:July 31st
957:Comment:
652:infinity
619:infinity
258:good? -
223:Comments
191:Question
179:See also
135:Phoenix2
1205:be bold
1150:Georgia
1087:Georgia
1067:Georgia
989:Protest
945:Support
899:Support
849:weasels
668:read?--
526:Comment
284:Comment
255:Comment
195:Newsday
1336:Oppose
1307:Oppose
1218:WP:OWN
1200:issue.
1185:WP:OWN
1043:quote.
1007:WP:MOS
983:WP:MSH
949:DevAlt
911:Update
709:oppose
149:WP:OWN
145:WP:OWN
121:WP:OWN
1148:Sandy
1085:Sandy
1065:Sandy
533:ALTON
407:, or
175:DONE'
16:<
1371:Tony
1276:Pete
1248:Pete
1234:Pete
1181:beer
1155:Talk
1092:Talk
1072:Talk
1023:riot
1021:and
1019:beer
1009:and
961:Pete
933:talk
928:Aude
923:Wow!
813:talk
808:Aude
800:Done
780:talk
775:Aude
762:DONE
718:DONE
688:talk
683:Aude
548:DONE
486:talk
481:Aude
457:talk
452:Aude
422:talk
417:Aude
365:talk
360:Aude
308:talk
303:Aude
245:talk
240:Aude
740:the
539:.ıl
470:?--
177:re
106:Man
89:own
1157:)
1094:)
1074:)
926:--
764:--
743:--
735:.
720:--
550:--
510:--
403:,
399:,
358:--
40:.
1361:a
1274:-
1196:.
1153:(
1090:(
1070:(
935:)
931:(
815:)
811:(
782:)
778:(
690:)
686:(
658:0
625:0
573:·
488:)
484:(
459:)
455:(
424:)
420:(
367:)
363:(
310:)
306:(
263:·
247:)
243:(
79:*
26:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.