564:. Accusing other editors of owning the article may appear aggressive, and could be perceived as a personal attack. Address the editor in a civil manner, with the same amount of respect you would expect. Often, editors accused of ownership may not even realize it, so it is important to assume good faith. Some editors may think they are protecting the article from vandalism, and may respond to any changes with hostility. Others may try to promote their own point of view, failing to recognize the importance of the
360:
header informing readers about the topic. Always avoid accusations, attacks, and speculations concerning the motivation of any editor. If the behaviour continues, the issue may require dispute resolution, but it is important to make a good attempt to communicate with the editor on the article talk page before proceeding to mediation, etc. Editors of this type often welcome discussion, so a simple exchange of ideas will usually solve the problem of ownership.
540:, they have rights to edit other pages in your user space as well. Usually others will not edit your primary user page, other than to address significant concerns (rarely) or to do routine housekeeping, such as handling project-related tags, disambiguating links to pages that have been moved, removing the page from categories meant for articles, replacing non-free content by linking to it, or removing obvious vandalism or
56:
112:
493:. Editors are asked to take particular care when editing a featured article; it is considerate to discuss significant changes of text or images on the talk page first. Explaining civilly why sources and policies support a particular version of a featured article does not necessarily constitute ownership. The
718:
The subject of an article is not required to police it for policy violations or otherwise keep it updated, etc. Keep in mind that even though
Knowledge (XXG) often comes up high on Google searches, the subject may not yet have discovered the article or even if they have, they may not know how to edit
432:
Knowledge (XXG) is the encyclopedia that "anyone can edit", but not all edits bring improvement. In many cases, a core group of editors will have worked to build the article up to its present state and will revert edits that they find detrimental in order, they believe, to preserve the quality of the
384:
The involvement of multiple editors, each defending the ownership of the other, can be highly complex. The simplest scenario usually consists of a dominant editor who is defended by other editors, reinforcing the former's ownership. This can be frustrating to both new and seasoned editors. As before,
326:
Being the primary or sole editor of an article does not constitute ownership, provided that contributions and input from fellow editors are not ignored or immediately disregarded. Editors familiar with the topic and in possession of relevant reliable sources may have watchlisted such articles and may
656:
Although the following statements, seen in isolation from any context or other statements, do not indicate ownership behavior or motivation, they may be part of a pattern that indicates ownership behavior. When they occur along with some form of dogged insistence and relentless pushing, without good
346:
While ownership behavior is often understood to involve the original creator of the article, it can also involve other editors who have conflicting interests in promoting or opposing the subject, hijacking the original article's direction and emphasis, changing the title to reflect such changes, or,
302:
with other contributors, why not take some time off from the editing process? Taking yourself out of the equation can cool things off considerably. Take a fresh look a week or two later. Or, if someone else is claiming "ownership" of a page, you can bring it up on the associated talk page, appeal to
639:
An editor comments on other editors' talk pages with the purpose of discouraging them from making additional contributions. The discussion can take many forms; it may be purely negative, consisting of threats and insults, often avoiding the topic of the article altogether. At the other extreme, the
310:
Even though editors can never "own" an article, it is important to respect the work and ideas of your fellow contributors. Therefore, be cautious when removing or rewriting large amounts of content, particularly if this content was written by one editor; it is more effective to try to work with the
635:
An editor reverts a good-faith change without providing an edit summary that refers to relevant
Knowledge (XXG) policies and guidelines, previous reviews and discussions, reliable sources, or specific grammar or prose problems introduced by the edit. Repeating such no-reason reversions after being
375:
may be necessary, but at least you will be on record as having attempted to solve the problem directly with the editor. It is important to make a good attempt to communicate with the editor on the article talk page before proceeding to mediation, etc. It may also be wise to allow them to withdraw
359:
to the article, so keep in mind that such editors may be experts in their field or have a genuine interest in maintaining the quality of the article and preserving accuracy. An editor who appears to assume ownership of an article should be approached on the article's talk page with a descriptive
277:
Some contributors feel possessive about material they have contributed to
Knowledge (XXG). A few editors will even defend such material against others. It is quite reasonable to take an interest in an article on a topic you care about—perhaps you are an expert, or perhaps it is just your hobby;
412:
on their part and regard their behavior as stewardship. Stewardship or shepherding of an article or group of related articles may be the result of a sincere personal interest in the subject matter or in a cause or organization related to it. The editor might also be an expert or otherwise very
616:
An editor disputes minor edits concerning layout, image use, and wording in a particular article frequently. The editor might claim, whether openly or implicitly, the right to review any changes before they can be added to the article. (This does not include the routine maintenance of article
120:
No one "owns" content (including articles or any page at
Knowledge (XXG)). If you create or edit an article, other editors can make changes, and you cannot prevent them from doing so. In addition, you should not undo their edits without good reason. Disagreements should be
433:
encyclopedia. Such reversion does not indicate an "ownership" problem, if it is supported by an edit summary referring to
Knowledge (XXG) policies and guidelines, previous reviews and discussions, or specific grammar or prose problems introduced by the edit.
327:
discuss or amend others' edits. This too does not equal ownership, provided it does not marginalise the valid opinions of others and is adequately justified. Often these editors can be approached and may offer assistance to those unfamiliar with the article.
640:
owner may patronize other editors, claiming that their ideas are interesting while also claiming that they lack the deep understanding of the subject necessary to edit the article (see the first two comments in the
Statements section just below).
533:. They are still part of Knowledge (XXG) and must serve its primary purposes; in particular, user talk pages make communication and collaboration among editors easier. These functions must not be hampered by ownership behavior.
440:
or accusations of ownership. In this way, the specifics of any change can be discussed with the editors who are familiar with the article, who are likewise expected to discuss the content civilly. All editors must follow
631:
An editor reverts a change simply because the editor finds it "unnecessary" without claiming that the change is detrimental. This has the effect of assigning priority, between two equivalent versions, to an owner's
937:
719:
it. Although subjects are allowed to make minor corrections and remove vandalism, they are normally discouraged from making substantial edits, so some subjects may prefer to stay away from editing them at all.
710:
The author of an article is not generally required to update an article for outdated information or changes in consensus as long as the content was accurate/according to consensus at the time of creation, see
1184:
777:
1099:
385:
address the topic and not the actions of the editors. If this fails, proceed to dispute resolution, but it is important to communicate on the talk page and attempt to resolve the dispute yourself
790:
1431:
552:
While it may be easy to identify ownership issues, it is far more difficult to resolve the conflict to the satisfaction of the editors involved. It is always helpful to remember to
930:
582:
If an editor consistently demonstrates behavior similar to that shown in the following examples in a certain article talk page, then they may have issues with page ownership.
1357:
715:. Keep in mind that not all authors are active or check their watchlist and even those that are/do will not necessarily check every edit or identify a problem with an edit.
295:
Similarly, by submitting your ideas (for article organization, categorization, style, standards, etc.) to
Knowledge (XXG), you allow others to challenge and develop them.
770:
1390:
734:
233:
1114:
763:
1590:
1385:
1124:
866:
1405:
1191:
1060:
414:
274:
say. No one whether a subject or an article creator has a responsibility to maintain an article or can normally be held responsible for its content.
486:
278:
however, if this watchfulness starts to become possessiveness, then you are overdoing it. Believing that an article has an owner of this sort is a
628:
An editor reverts justified article changes by different editors repeatedly over an extended period to protect a certain version, stable or not.
371:
by discussing the topic on the talk page. You may need to ignore attacks made in response to a query. If ownership persists after a discussion,
1656:
1488:
490:
1378:
279:
861:
436:
Where disagreement persists after such a reversion, the editor proposing the change should first take the matter to the talk page, without
1410:
787:
504:
64:
285:
Once you have posted it to
Knowledge (XXG), you cannot stop anyone from editing text you have written. As each edit page clearly states:
1400:
1395:
1415:
1352:
856:
418:
226:
1129:
1089:
947:
875:
851:
520:
1025:
577:
437:
187:
1620:
1441:
1119:
1094:
1040:
368:
304:
167:
122:
482:
1651:
1483:
1259:
1206:
1179:
1109:
1084:
476:
409:
320:
1661:
1605:
1055:
1050:
1020:
925:
881:
809:
138:
72:
1567:
219:
1373:
1254:
1174:
957:
952:
202:
147:
1436:
1342:
1297:
1249:
1244:
962:
920:
886:
671:"I'm an expert on the subject. If you have any suggestions, please put them in the talk page and I will review them."
489:, where they are checked for high-quality sources, a thorough survey of the relevant literature, and compliance with
177:
1330:
915:
846:
422:
30:"WP:OWN" redirects here. For the guideline about users' own talk pages and the removal of posts and comments, see
1325:
1045:
1035:
802:
299:
197:
172:
497:
1196:
668:"I created/wrote the majority of this article." (implying some kind of right or status exists because of that)
157:
262:
of a particular article (or any part of it). Even a subject of an article, be that a person or organization,
1562:
1629:
1495:
1134:
1010:
942:
910:
871:
516:
182:
45:
977:
1500:
1201:
1104:
1015:
1005:
729:
681:
526:
316:
207:
162:
680:"I can see nothing wrong with the article and there is no need to change anything at all." (misapplying
537:
1512:
1507:
1000:
662:
586:
458:
426:
364:
312:
152:
126:
86:
76:
823:
44:
This page is about control over an article's text. For the ownership of copyright in an article, see
1347:
1337:
622:
31:
746:
657:
policy back up, and often including edit warring, they may be an expression of ownership behavior.
503:
template on the talk page will contain a link to the featured article candidacy and any subsequent
311:
editor than against them—even if you think they are acting as if they "own" the article. (See also
618:
442:
1151:
1572:
37:"WP:OOP" redirects here. For the humorous essay on the usage of "OOPS" to defend oneself, see
712:
565:
553:
38:
755:
485:) are open for editing like any other, they have gone through a community review process as
644:
561:
557:
541:
1552:
446:
372:
688:
413:
knowledgeable in the subject matter and able to provide credible insights for locating
363:
If you find that the editor continues to be hostile, makes personal attacks, or wages
1645:
1221:
417:. The editors in question are no less responsible for adhering to core policies like
1529:
355:
In many cases (but not all), single editors engaged in ownership conflicts are also
750:
290:
Work submitted to
Knowledge (XXG) can be edited, used, and redistributed by anyone.
129:. There is generally no responsibility on subjects or authors to maintain articles.
17:
1557:
247:
335:
There are two common types of ownership conflicts between users: those involving
1274:
251:
398:
706:
Subjects and authors aren't responsible for updating content. Examples:
481:
347:
if unsuccessful, blanking or deleting the article as a form of revenge.
661:"Are you qualified to edit this article?" / "You only have X edits." (
674:"Please do not make any more changes without my/their/our approval."
529:
as they see fit. Nevertheless, they are not personal homepages, and
525:
Knowledge (XXG) offers wide latitude to users to manage their user
636:
asked for a rationale is a strong indicator of ownership behavior.
71:
It describes a widely accepted standard that all editors should
759:
258:, no matter what, has the right to act as though they are the
106:
50:
397:"WP:STEWARDSHIP" redirects here. For the group of users, see
1460:
694:"You hadn't edited the article or talk page previously."
536:
While other users and bots will more commonly edit your
601:
594:
479:(identified by a bronze star in the upper-right corner
466:
94:
521:
Knowledge (XXG):Talk page guidelines § User talk pages
376:
from the conversation and return when they are ready.
250:
pages and articles are edited collaboratively by the
1100:
Do not disrupt
Knowledge (XXG) to illustrate a point
405:
1537:
1525:
1468:
1458:
1424:
1366:
1306:
1282:
1272:
1229:
1219:
1159:
1149:
1069:
985:
975:
895:
831:
821:
749:– A discussion of authorship of Wiki pages on the
617:consistency, such as preservation of established
938:Do not include copies of lengthy primary sources
735:Knowledge (XXG):Don't revert without explanation
730:Knowledge (XXG):Consensus § Levels of consensus
287:
63:This page documents an English Knowledge (XXG)
252:Wikipedian community of volunteer contributors
771:
677:"Please clear this with WikiProject Z first."
443:the official policy about discussing disputes
227:
8:
1526:
406:exhibits behaviour associated with ownership
389:escalating the conflict resolution process.
125:, starting with a discussion on the article
1432:Categories, lists, and navigation templates
1534:
1465:
1318:
1279:
1226:
1156:
982:
828:
778:
764:
756:
234:
220:
134:
75:follow. Changes made to it should reflect
137:
7:
303:other contributors, or consider the
1591:List of all policies and guidelines
578:Knowledge (XXG):No personal attacks
1630:Summaries of values and principles
1471:
1309:
1072:
898:
697:"You're vandalizing my hard work."
643:An editor reverts any edit with a
25:
321:Knowledge (XXG):Assume good faith
1657:Knowledge (XXG) conduct policies
1540:
1285:
1232:
1162:
1115:Please do not bite the newcomers
988:
834:
480:
282:people make on Knowledge (XXG).
110:
54:
572:Examples of ownership behaviour
1:
1125:Responding to threats of harm
867:Biographies of living persons
491:the featured article criteria
1192:Criteria for speedy deletion
1061:Paid-contribution disclosure
270:what the article may or may
268:nor has any right to dictate
862:What Knowledge (XXG) is not
487:featured article candidates
425:with reliable sources, and
298:If you find yourself in an
1678:
584:
575:
548:Resolving ownership issues
517:Knowledge (XXG):User pages
514:
456:
396:
84:
46:Knowledge (XXG):Copyrights
43:
36:
29:
1585:
1321:
797:
531:are not owned by the user
393:Ownership and stewardship
380:Multiple-editor ownership
317:Knowledge (XXG):Etiquette
1652:Knowledge (XXG) policies
505:featured article reviews
313:Knowledge (XXG):Civility
118:This page in a nutshell:
27:Wikimedia project policy
1662:Knowledge (XXG) culture
1568:Licensing and copyright
788:policies and guidelines
419:neutrality of viewpoint
351:Single-editor ownership
293:
1563:Friendly space policy
1353:Broad-concept article
857:Neutral point of view
576:Further information:
1130:Talk page guidelines
1090:Conflict of interest
1031:Ownership of content
876:Copyright violations
852:No original research
786:Knowledge (XXG) key
647:in the edit summary.
357:primary contributors
339:and those involving
193:Ownership of content
1026:No personal attacks
948:Don't create hoaxes
188:No personal attacks
18:Knowledge (XXG):OWN
1621:List of guidelines
1442:Template namespace
1120:Courtesy vanishing
1095:Disruptive editing
1041:Dispute resolution
373:dispute resolution
369:disruptive editing
331:Types of ownership
305:dispute resolution
168:Dispute resolution
1639:
1638:
1581:
1580:
1521:
1520:
1484:Project namespace
1454:
1453:
1450:
1449:
1391:Dates and numbers
1358:Understandability
1268:
1267:
1215:
1214:
1207:Revision deletion
1180:Proposed deletion
1145:
1144:
1110:Gaming the system
1085:Assume good faith
971:
970:
558:assume good faith
477:featured articles
453:Featured articles
438:personal comments
410:assume good faith
404:Unless an editor
266:own the article,
244:
243:
133:
132:
105:
104:
16:(Redirected from
1669:
1616:
1615:
1606:List of policies
1601:
1600:
1558:List of policies
1545:
1544:
1543:
1535:
1531:
1528:
1476:
1475:
1474:
1466:
1462:
1459:Project content
1319:
1314:
1313:
1312:
1290:
1289:
1288:
1280:
1276:
1237:
1236:
1235:
1227:
1223:
1167:
1166:
1165:
1157:
1153:
1077:
1076:
1075:
1056:Child protection
1051:No legal threats
1021:Ignore all rules
993:
992:
991:
983:
979:
926:Reliable sources
903:
902:
901:
839:
838:
837:
829:
825:
810:Ignore all rules
792:
780:
773:
766:
757:
604:
597:
502:
496:
484:
469:
415:reliable sources
367:, try to ignore
341:multiple editors
236:
229:
222:
139:Conduct policies
135:
114:
113:
107:
97:
58:
57:
51:
21:
1677:
1676:
1672:
1671:
1670:
1668:
1667:
1666:
1642:
1641:
1640:
1635:
1613:
1612:
1598:
1597:
1577:
1541:
1539:
1517:
1472:
1470:
1446:
1420:
1374:Manual of Style
1362:
1310:
1308:
1302:
1286:
1284:
1264:
1260:Page protection
1233:
1231:
1211:
1175:Deletion policy
1163:
1161:
1141:
1073:
1071:
1065:
989:
987:
967:
958:Patent nonsense
953:Fringe theories
899:
897:
891:
835:
833:
817:
793:
784:
747:AuthorshipModel
743:
726:
704:
654:
645:personal attack
623:citation styles
613:
608:
607:
602:WP:OWNBEHAVIOUR
600:
593:
589:
580:
574:
550:
523:
513:
500:
498:article history
494:
473:
472:
465:
461:
455:
408:, it's best to
402:
395:
382:
353:
333:
248:Knowledge (XXG)
240:
203:Username policy
123:calmly resolved
111:
101:
100:
93:
89:
81:
80:
55:
49:
42:
35:
28:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
1675:
1673:
1665:
1664:
1659:
1654:
1644:
1643:
1637:
1636:
1634:
1633:
1626:
1625:
1624:
1609:
1586:
1583:
1582:
1579:
1578:
1576:
1575:
1573:Privacy policy
1570:
1565:
1560:
1555:
1549:
1547:
1532:
1523:
1522:
1519:
1518:
1516:
1515:
1510:
1505:
1504:
1503:
1493:
1492:
1491:
1480:
1478:
1463:
1456:
1455:
1452:
1451:
1448:
1447:
1445:
1444:
1439:
1437:Categorization
1434:
1428:
1426:
1425:Classification
1422:
1421:
1419:
1418:
1413:
1408:
1403:
1398:
1393:
1388:
1383:
1382:
1381:
1370:
1368:
1364:
1363:
1361:
1360:
1355:
1350:
1345:
1343:Disambiguation
1340:
1335:
1334:
1333:
1322:
1316:
1304:
1303:
1301:
1300:
1298:Editing policy
1294:
1292:
1277:
1270:
1269:
1266:
1265:
1263:
1262:
1257:
1252:
1247:
1245:Administrators
1241:
1239:
1224:
1217:
1216:
1213:
1212:
1210:
1209:
1204:
1199:
1194:
1189:
1188:
1187:
1177:
1171:
1169:
1154:
1147:
1146:
1143:
1142:
1140:
1139:
1138:
1137:
1127:
1122:
1117:
1112:
1107:
1102:
1097:
1092:
1087:
1081:
1079:
1067:
1066:
1064:
1063:
1058:
1053:
1048:
1043:
1038:
1033:
1028:
1023:
1018:
1013:
1008:
1003:
997:
995:
980:
973:
972:
969:
968:
966:
965:
963:External links
960:
955:
950:
945:
940:
935:
934:
933:
923:
921:Citing sources
918:
913:
907:
905:
893:
892:
890:
889:
887:Article titles
884:
879:
869:
864:
859:
854:
849:
843:
841:
826:
819:
818:
816:
815:
814:
813:
798:
795:
794:
785:
783:
782:
775:
768:
760:
754:
753:
742:
741:External links
739:
738:
737:
732:
725:
722:
721:
720:
716:
703:
702:Responsibility
700:
699:
698:
695:
692:
689:peanut-gallery
685:
678:
675:
672:
669:
666:
653:
650:
649:
648:
641:
637:
633:
629:
626:
612:
609:
606:
605:
598:
595:WP:OWNBEHAVIOR
590:
585:
573:
570:
549:
546:
538:user talk page
512:
509:
471:
470:
462:
457:
454:
451:
394:
391:
388:
381:
378:
352:
349:
332:
329:
280:common mistake
242:
241:
239:
238:
231:
224:
216:
213:
212:
211:
210:
205:
200:
195:
190:
185:
180:
178:Editing policy
175:
170:
165:
160:
155:
150:
142:
141:
131:
130:
115:
103:
102:
99:
98:
90:
85:
82:
70:
69:
61:
59:
26:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1674:
1663:
1660:
1658:
1655:
1653:
1650:
1649:
1647:
1632:
1631:
1627:
1623:
1622:
1617:
1610:
1608:
1607:
1602:
1595:
1594:
1593:
1592:
1588:
1587:
1584:
1574:
1571:
1569:
1566:
1564:
1561:
1559:
1556:
1554:
1551:
1550:
1548:
1546:
1536:
1533:
1524:
1514:
1511:
1509:
1506:
1502:
1499:
1498:
1497:
1494:
1490:
1487:
1486:
1485:
1482:
1481:
1479:
1477:
1467:
1464:
1457:
1443:
1440:
1438:
1435:
1433:
1430:
1429:
1427:
1423:
1417:
1414:
1412:
1409:
1407:
1404:
1402:
1399:
1397:
1394:
1392:
1389:
1387:
1386:Accessibility
1384:
1380:
1377:
1376:
1375:
1372:
1371:
1369:
1365:
1359:
1356:
1354:
1351:
1349:
1346:
1344:
1341:
1339:
1336:
1332:
1331:Summary style
1329:
1328:
1327:
1324:
1323:
1320:
1317:
1315:
1305:
1299:
1296:
1295:
1293:
1291:
1281:
1278:
1271:
1261:
1258:
1256:
1253:
1251:
1248:
1246:
1243:
1242:
1240:
1238:
1228:
1225:
1218:
1208:
1205:
1203:
1200:
1198:
1195:
1193:
1190:
1186:
1183:
1182:
1181:
1178:
1176:
1173:
1172:
1170:
1168:
1158:
1155:
1148:
1136:
1133:
1132:
1131:
1128:
1126:
1123:
1121:
1118:
1116:
1113:
1111:
1108:
1106:
1103:
1101:
1098:
1096:
1093:
1091:
1088:
1086:
1083:
1082:
1080:
1078:
1068:
1062:
1059:
1057:
1054:
1052:
1049:
1047:
1044:
1042:
1039:
1037:
1034:
1032:
1029:
1027:
1024:
1022:
1019:
1017:
1014:
1012:
1009:
1007:
1004:
1002:
999:
998:
996:
994:
984:
981:
974:
964:
961:
959:
956:
954:
951:
949:
946:
944:
941:
939:
936:
932:
929:
928:
927:
924:
922:
919:
917:
916:Autobiography
914:
912:
909:
908:
906:
904:
894:
888:
885:
883:
880:
877:
873:
870:
868:
865:
863:
860:
858:
855:
853:
850:
848:
847:Verifiability
845:
844:
842:
840:
830:
827:
820:
812:
811:
807:
806:
805:
804:
800:
799:
796:
789:
781:
776:
774:
769:
767:
762:
761:
758:
752:
751:CommunityWiki
748:
745:
744:
740:
736:
733:
731:
728:
727:
723:
717:
714:
709:
708:
707:
701:
696:
693:
690:
686:
683:
679:
676:
673:
670:
667:
664:
660:
659:
658:
651:
646:
642:
638:
634:
630:
627:
624:
620:
615:
614:
610:
603:
599:
596:
592:
591:
588:
583:
579:
571:
569:
567:
563:
560:, and remain
559:
555:
547:
545:
543:
539:
534:
532:
528:
522:
518:
510:
508:
506:
499:
492:
488:
483:
478:
468:
464:
463:
460:
452:
450:
448:
444:
439:
434:
430:
428:
424:
423:verifiability
420:
416:
411:
407:
400:
399:meta:Stewards
392:
390:
386:
379:
377:
374:
370:
366:
361:
358:
350:
348:
344:
342:
338:
330:
328:
324:
322:
318:
314:
308:
306:
301:
296:
292:
291:
286:
283:
281:
275:
273:
269:
265:
261:
257:
253:
249:
237:
232:
230:
225:
223:
218:
217:
215:
214:
209:
206:
204:
201:
199:
196:
194:
191:
189:
186:
184:
181:
179:
176:
174:
171:
169:
166:
164:
161:
159:
156:
154:
151:
149:
148:Block evasion
146:
145:
144:
143:
140:
136:
128:
124:
119:
116:
109:
108:
96:
92:
91:
88:
83:
78:
74:
68:
66:
60:
53:
52:
47:
40:
33:
19:
1628:
1619:
1611:
1604:
1596:
1589:
1553:Terms of Use
1538:
1489:WikiProjects
1469:
1406:Lead section
1326:Article size
1307:
1283:
1230:
1220:Enforcement
1160:
1070:
1046:Sockpuppetry
1036:Edit warring
1030:
986:
896:
832:
808:
803:Five pillars
801:
705:
682:WP:AINTBROKE
663:pulling rank
655:
581:
551:
544:violations.
535:
530:
524:
515:Main pages:
474:
447:edit warring
435:
431:
403:
383:
362:
356:
354:
345:
340:
336:
334:
325:
309:
297:
294:
289:
288:
284:
276:
271:
267:
263:
259:
255:
245:
198:Sockpuppetry
192:
173:Edit warring
117:
62:
1197:Attack page
1185:Biographies
158:Clean start
1646:Categories
1501:User boxes
1496:User pages
1135:Signatures
1011:Harassment
943:Plagiarism
911:Notability
652:Statements
566:neutrality
511:User pages
445:and avoid
337:one editor
183:Harassment
32:WP:OWNTALK
1508:Shortcuts
1202:Oversight
1150:Deletion
1105:Etiquette
1016:Vandalism
1006:Consensus
882:Image use
872:Copyright
587:Shortcuts
554:stay calm
365:edit wars
307:process.
208:Vandalism
163:Consensus
127:talk page
77:consensus
1513:Subpages
1379:Contents
1348:Hatnotes
1273:Editing
1255:Blocking
1001:Civility
976:Conduct
931:Medicine
822:Content
724:See also
691:editor."
632:version.
619:spelling
568:policy.
467:WP:FAOWN
459:Shortcut
427:civility
300:edit war
264:does not
153:Civility
87:Shortcut
73:normally
1411:Linking
1338:Be bold
1250:Banning
713:WP:MESS
611:Actions
39:WP:OOPS
1401:Layout
1396:Images
687:"Undo
475:While
387:before
319:, and
256:No one
95:WP:OWN
65:policy
1416:Lists
1367:Style
562:civil
527:space
260:owner
519:and
246:All
1530:(?)
1527:WMF
1461:(?)
1275:(?)
1222:(?)
1152:(?)
978:(?)
824:(?)
791:(?)
621:or
542:BLP
323:.)
272:not
1648::
1618::
1603::
625:.)
556:,
507:.
501:}}
495:{{
449:.
429:.
421:,
343:.
315:,
254:.
1614:G
1599:P
1542:P
1473:G
1311:G
1287:P
1234:P
1164:P
1074:G
990:P
900:G
878:)
874:(
836:P
779:e
772:t
765:v
684:)
665:)
401:.
235:e
228:t
221:v
79:.
67:.
48:.
41:.
34:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.