562:- Read through the article, only ever played one fighting game before (and never a Capcom one) and I had no trouble following what was going on. Didn't spot any prose concerns, and I agree with the above analysis of the references. I'm not sure about the character table, but not enough to withhold my support. Two points- I'd like to see the Famitsu review in the review table, though, since it's a Japanese game and that's the primary Japanese review. Also, ref 45 is one page, so p., not pp. --
683:
articles to become. It so says so much in so few words, and the only issue I find with it is the large amount of whitespace in the characters' section because of the table, but it does not take away from the content of the article, which is what
Knowledge is used for. Sorry for such a lengthy comment, but that's my view on this article. Sincerely
326:
I understand the gist of the comment below, but this comment is more to other reviewers as well: unlike your list of events from
Olympic games (which are generally reasonably well known, and more a matter of what specific events they didn't program in), we're talking characters that may be obscure to
682:
As a fighting game enthuiast, i'm quite interested in any fighting game that appears for GAN or FAC. I've taken a once, a twice, and a thrice over the article and nothing appears to conflict with this game becoming FAC. Infact, I believe this article should become the benchmark for all fighting game
436:
I just attempted to solve most of these problems. Like with Flow, I was the main copyeditor on this article. Unfortunately, I've never played the game; I had a hard time understanding a lot of the stuff in the
Gameplay section. If something doesn't make sense, it's probably because I couldn't figure
293:
would it be worthwhile on the table to identity the game or property that each of the characters are from? A casual reader seeing this table may not know who all the characters are but connecting them to their source would help that (they still may not know the source, but that's ok for this level
533:
and I think
Killian does in this case as well) boost them to the standard necessary for inclusion in an FA. I have no issues with the prose and I don't think the article gets into game cruft; it's one of the few fighting games where I can follow all the different modes, and it's not presented as a
548:
I believe that the article meets the FA criteria. The changes from the last FAC (which I also supported) look to have improved the prose. I'm not pleased to see the character list return, but I don't think that should hold up this nomination. I'll pursue that on the article's talk page.
409:
529:(sorry it took so long for me to get around, but I'm a busy man!) I think the aforementioned Destructoid, Kotaku and GamesRadar refs are fine. While the Destructoid and GamesRadar pubs are iffier as sources in general, I think the authors (Crecente definitely meets
327:
some people, particularly those on the
Tatsunoko side. If no one else raises the issue, hey, fine, addition later may be ok. But others may feel for this FA to be complete the list needs more explanation. I'm ok without them those see the value in that. --
122:
117:
390:
Note: I am reading this sequentially (i.e. general reader perspective), so if something makes sense later in prose, but I complain about it -- so would most likely a general reader. I have also never played any game in this (these?) series.
376:
807:. The best place that defines it is the navigational template at the bottom of the article. Weighing in what you and H3llkn0wz said, how is "Vs. video game series consisting of Marvel vs. Capcom and Capcom vs. SNK"?
505:
Well, looks fine to me. I am going to say "weak" though, since it is a bit gamecrufty but would at the same time expect the general reader to have some basic idea of what a fighting game is. But definitely, support.
344:
Just pointing out that the current version of the character table DOES link to their respective series/franchise, except in the event where they have an actual character page. That should be enough, right? --
88:
83:
197:
92:
75:
584:
That's the only score for CGoH and since its never abbreviated in the article (I don't think anyone other than fans abbreviate it), I chose to leave it in prose. Otherwise, good catch.
138:
833:
791:
746:
712:
692:
659:
642:
575:
553:
540:
519:
478:
464:
446:
427:
354:
339:
306:
284:
258:
232:
220:
169:
705:
79:
621:
The use of quotations in the
Reception section borders on excessive. Use quotations only when the statement is something memorable and not easily paraphrased.
40:
71:
64:
143:
30:
17:
245:; see it with the tool in the upper right of this page (The gamezone link, all of your wayback ones are too but that's on purpose). --
271:
The article uses two non-free images and one free image. I am reasonably satisfied that the use of the non-free images complies with
375:
editors want to do about it, I think its best to take that discussion to
Tatsunoko's talk page. If it helps, my last passed FA,
205:
618:
issues: the punctuation for full quotations is supposed to go inside the closing quote (has any of this been checked for MoS?)
469:
Thanks. Anyway, I hope that I've alleviated your concerns thus far. I'll continue to tweak the prose if necessary, though.
624:"Ben Kuchera of Ars Technica enthusiastically wrote" How does one enthusiastically write? Quick typing with giddy noises?
483:
Yeah, the
Wikiproject need more people like him (and you). Unless I've missed something, I think that's most/all of it.
754:
That rings a bell. I think this is easily solved by including "released in" with the year. There's actually a template
804:
688:
178:
776:
842:
808:
758:
665:
652:
585:
484:
474:
442:
380:
316:
213:
162:
182:
208:'s quality were questioned and are still in the article. While I find "high quality reliable sources" and "
829:
787:
742:
350:
684:
637:
212:" together as an oxymoron, does anyone else have concerns with their use? Also, images were not changed.
209:
201:
451:
Oh, not you again! :) But, seriously, you are doing valuable job CEing articles, so kudos for that! —
728:
515:
470:
460:
438:
423:
400:
379:, talked about adding a list of events. That closed with the discussion still ongoing elsewhere.
226:
Since the sources were a particular issue last FAC, I'll take a thorough look at them when able.
822:
821:"Up to two players"? Not much of a range-- wouldn't that be the same as one or two players?
780:
735:
720:
709:
550:
346:
186:
53:
630:
535:
280:
227:
569:
335:
302:
252:
508:
453:
416:
393:
272:
530:
615:
109:
609:
276:
564:
328:
295:
247:
189:, came the revival of the fighting genre and the next Vs. installment. Timing
123:
Featured article candidates/Tatsunoko vs. Capcom: Ultimate All-Stars/archive2
118:
Featured article candidates/Tatsunoko vs. Capcom: Ultimate All-Stars/archive1
242:
241:- no dabs or dead external links. 1 external redirect which may lead to
185:
installments went on hiatus for nearly eight years. With the arrival of
719:
I thought these Easter egg date links were specifically discouraged by
177:
Capcom's "legendary" Versus fighting video game series known for the
39:
Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in
193:
have been intentional, but in any case let the nitpicking begin!
190:
755:
775:
series, and why is there no link to it? All I can find is
148:
701:
648:
372:
368:
312:
105:
101:
97:
57:
315:
is what the list use to look like. See comment below.
708:
wasn't in-depth, and no one replied to my comments. (
855:The above discussion is preserved as an archive.
43:. No further edits should be made to this page.
861:No further edits should be made to this page.
29:The following is an archived discussion of a
8:
127:
41:Knowledge talk:Featured article candidates
771:Undefined term in the lead, what is the
664:Checkout comments from H3llkn0wz above.
72:Tatsunoko vs. Capcom: Ultimate All-Stars
65:Tatsunoko vs. Capcom: Ultimate All-Stars
700:Just as an FYI for those interested, I
130:
115:
18:Knowledge:Featured article candidates
7:
803:series since editors focused on its
706:discussion on the article talk page
24:
757:for that, which I've included.
727:It was originally released in
387:19:22, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
323:19:22, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
1:
799:There is no article for this
602:. Spot-checking for problems:
355:07:00, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
340:23:54, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
307:18:42, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
285:15:14, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
259:00:40, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
233:20:02, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
221:01:21, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
170:01:21, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
239:Disambig/External Link check
196:In regards to the last FAC,
408:Moved resolved comments to
31:featured article nomination
878:
849:18:33, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
834:17:33, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
815:18:38, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
792:17:32, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
777:Heisei era (daikaiju eiga)
765:18:33, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
747:17:30, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
731:as the Japan-exclusive ...
723:? Unsure, please review:
713:14:35, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
702:removed the character list
693:21:28, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
672:18:15, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
660:00:42, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
643:03:09, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
592:20:56, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
576:00:00, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
428:17:26, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
841:Yes, changed it to that.
554:20:59, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
541:18:53, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
537:Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs
520:19:31, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
491:01:42, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
479:22:24, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
465:21:36, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
447:21:10, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
229:Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs
858:Please do not modify it.
36:Please do not modify it.
367:Since its easy to add,
266:image copyright review
210:Video game journalism
56:19:13, 26 March 2011
365:About character list
437:out what it meant.
600:More review needed
805:Marvel sub-series
518:
463:
426:
403:
377:Mario & Sonic
187:Street Fighter IV
179:Marvel vs. Capcom
173:
156:
155:
869:
860:
846:
826:
812:
784:
762:
739:
685:Subzerosmokerain
669:
656:
640:
635:
589:
572:
567:
538:
511:
507:
488:
456:
452:
419:
415:
396:
392:
384:
332:
320:
299:
255:
250:
230:
217:
166:
159:
128:
113:
95:
48:The article was
38:
877:
876:
872:
871:
870:
868:
867:
866:
865:
856:
844:
824:
810:
782:
760:
737:
667:
654:
638:
631:
587:
570:
565:
536:
509:
486:
454:
417:
394:
382:
330:
318:
297:
253:
248:
228:
215:
164:
86:
70:
68:
34:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
875:
873:
864:
863:
852:
851:
850:
819:
818:
817:
816:
769:
768:
767:
766:
733:
732:
717:
716:
695:
676:
675:
674:
673:
662:
627:
626:
625:
622:
619:
613:
604:
603:
596:
595:
594:
593:
579:
578:
557:
543:
523:
522:
499:
498:
497:
496:
495:
494:
493:
492:
481:
471:JimmyBlackwing
439:JimmyBlackwing
431:
430:
362:
361:
360:
359:
358:
357:
294:of detail). --
288:
287:
269:
236:
235:
183:Capcom vs. SNK
175:
174:
161:Nominator(s):
154:
153:
152:
151:
149:External links
146:
141:
133:
132:
126:
125:
120:
67:
62:
61:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
874:
862:
859:
853:
848:
847:
840:
839:
838:
837:
836:
835:
831:
827:
814:
813:
806:
802:
798:
797:
796:
795:
794:
793:
789:
785:
778:
774:
764:
763:
756:
753:
752:
751:
750:
749:
748:
744:
740:
730:
726:
725:
724:
722:
714:
711:
707:
703:
699:
696:
694:
690:
686:
681:
678:
677:
671:
670:
663:
661:
658:
657:
650:
646:
645:
644:
641:
636:
634:
628:
623:
620:
617:
614:
611:
608:
607:
606:
605:
601:
598:
597:
591:
590:
583:
582:
581:
580:
577:
574:
573:
568:
561:
558:
555:
552:
547:
546:Weak support:
544:
542:
539:
532:
528:
525:
524:
521:
517:
513:
504:
501:
500:
490:
489:
482:
480:
476:
472:
468:
467:
466:
462:
458:
450:
449:
448:
444:
440:
435:
434:
433:
432:
429:
425:
421:
413:
411:
410:the talk page
406:
405:
404:
402:
398:
388:
386:
385:
378:
374:
370:
366:
356:
352:
348:
343:
342:
341:
337:
333:
325:
324:
322:
321:
314:
311:
310:
309:
308:
304:
300:
292:
286:
282:
278:
274:
270:
267:
263:
262:
261:
260:
257:
256:
251:
244:
240:
234:
231:
225:
224:
223:
222:
219:
218:
211:
207:
203:
199:
194:
192:
188:
184:
180:
172:
171:
168:
167:
158:
157:
150:
147:
145:
142:
140:
137:
136:
135:
134:
129:
124:
121:
119:
116:
114:
111:
107:
103:
99:
94:
90:
85:
81:
77:
73:
66:
63:
60:
58:
55:
51:
44:
42:
37:
32:
27:
26:
19:
857:
854:
843:
820:
809:
800:
772:
770:
759:
734:
718:
710:Guyinblack25
697:
679:
666:
653:
632:
599:
586:
563:
559:
551:Guyinblack25
545:
534:game guide.
526:
503:Weak support
502:
485:
407:
389:
381:
364:
363:
347:Cyberlink420
317:
290:
289:
265:
246:
238:
237:
214:
195:
176:
163:
160:
144:Citation bot
69:
54:SandyGeorgia
49:
47:
35:
28:
610:MOS:CAPTION
264:Here is an
206:Destructoid
198:Games Radar
721:WP:MOSDATE
633:Andy Walsh
268:by Stifle.
698:Comment:
373:whatever
243:link rot
139:Analysis
50:promoted
845:« ₣M₣ »
825:Georgia
811:« ₣M₣ »
783:Georgia
761:« ₣M₣ »
738:Georgia
680:Support
668:« ₣M₣ »
655:« ₣M₣ »
588:« ₣M₣ »
560:Support
527:Support
487:« ₣M₣ »
383:« ₣M₣ »
319:« ₣M₣ »
291:Comment
273:WP:NFCC
216:« ₣M₣ »
165:« ₣M₣ »
131:Toolbox
89:protect
84:history
704:. The
647:Asked
639:(talk)
531:WP:SPS
369:remove
277:Stifle
204:, and
202:Kotaku
93:delete
823:Sandy
781:Sandy
736:Sandy
616:WP:LQ
612:issue
512:KNOWZ
457:KNOWZ
420:KNOWZ
397:KNOWZ
371:, or
110:views
102:watch
98:links
16:<
830:Talk
788:Talk
743:Talk
729:2008
689:talk
649:Tony
566:Pres
516:TALK
510:HELL
475:talk
461:TALK
455:HELL
443:talk
424:TALK
418:HELL
401:TALK
395:HELL
351:talk
331:ASEM
313:This
298:ASEM
281:talk
249:Pres
181:and
106:logs
80:talk
76:edit
801:Vs.
779:.
773:Vs.
191:may
52:by
832:)
790:)
745:)
691:)
651:.
629:--
506:—
477:)
445:)
414:—
391:—
353:)
338:)
305:)
283:)
275:.
200:,
108:|
104:|
100:|
96:|
91:|
87:|
82:|
78:|
59:.
33:.
828:(
786:(
741:(
715:)
687:(
571:N
556:)
549:(
514:▎
473:(
459:▎
441:(
422:▎
412:.
399:▎
349:(
336:t
334:(
329:M
303:t
301:(
296:M
279:(
254:N
112:)
74:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.