221:, under the Style heading, states that the recommended implementation is "Three unspaced periods (...)." It then goes on to state under the Function and implementation heading, that you need to "Put a space on each side of an ellipsis ...” except for the 3 examples listed under that heading (in relation to an ending quotation mark, brackets within the quotation, and any terminal punctuation). The edits made to The FP article reflected those guidelines. Any changes to that would not reflect the MOS guidelines. (btw, really like Erik's notes)
1184:. Even though this is a quirky little film, the article is well sourced, as well as being well-written, without any paraphrasing issues. The images are all free or have fair use rationales. The article is comprehensive, going into detail without straying into trivia; its tone is neutral, and the edit history shows the article's stability. The lead is a very well written summary of the article which follows, and the structure is appropriate, following the guidelines of the film project, as per
276:
the quote is "I only regret, that I have but one life to lose for my country." But you only use a portion of it, like: In an impassioned speech Hale regretted that he had "... but one life to lose for my country." I know that some people would put: In an impassioned speech Hale regretted that he had "but one life to lose for my country." In proper grammar, either is acceptable (depending on either the
Chicago or MLA style). But in the MOS does not say that.
1213:. The topic at the time of nomination was comprehensive and well-researched. I copy-edited some of the article body to clarify some sentences and asked the nominator to review some confusing passages, which are now addressed. The article is stable, and a concern of neutrality was addressed as stated above. Beyond that, the article satisfies the style guidelines (the general ones as well as
393:. These two both negate the ellipses at the beginning and end of quotes. I'm not saying that means we should follow that, but it does raise the interesting point that perhaps this area of the MOS has been ignored, rather than updated. Personally, I would say we leave it without all of the ellipses and opening a comment on the MOS talk page. What do you guys think?
345:. But that has to with general writing. My point has to do with what is stated in the MOS, which is supposed to be the guide on wp. I think this might be a useful discussion on that talk page, because I agree with you about how it looks (in other words, I also think the MOS is incorrect, using their current wording), but I attempt to follow the MOS guidelines.
1861:, Baffle gab1978 has finished the c/e of this article. Some of you may have issues with new phrasings or things being unclear. If you wouldn't mind taking another pass at the article and reaffirming your votes, or posting new comments for improvement, it would be very much obliged. Thank you to everyone!
2354:
Fixed the publication location (since
Drafthouse Films is based in Austin, I'm making a safe assumption). I watched the short film again, and it opens with "The Machine presents" so I'm assuming that's the publisher. As for the CHUD source, the site itself isn't the most reliable and on its own fails
275:
I understand your feeling, Erik. That was how, in my normal writing, I used them. However, if we're using the MOS guidelines, it is pretty clear, if you omit stuff from the quoted text, an ellipse MUST be used. It does not limit those omissions to only the middle of the quotation. For example, if
104:
knock-off, so that should set the tone for you. I've been working on this article consistently since
February, and I believe it has reached FA level. The article is well-sourced, featuring many direct interviews with the filmmakers and the featurettes/commentary from the film itself. The information
2209:
Thank you! I've updated The_FP.jpg with a more expansive FUR; I accidentally included the
Knowledge (XXG) URL at the end of it, but overall, it doesn't need a direct source as all of them would be the same licensing. I also added a considerably more expansive FUR to the image of Sean Whalen. Please
978:
I've copy-edited the "Cast" and "Production" sections and will continue to copy-edit the rest of the article body. On the content side of things, I think the counter-response passages under "Critical response" is problematic. I have not really seen precedent for this kind of thing, especially for a
1703:
Just a note to tell reviewers that this article is currently undergoing a requested GOCE copy-edit by yours truly. Therefore it shouldn't be reviewed for FA status until the copy-edit is finished because the text will be subject to changes. Perhaps the reviewer(s) would consider putting the review
216:
clearly states, "The wording of the quoted text should be faithfully reproduced ... Use ellipses to indicate omissions from quoted text." If you are quoting someone, and are omitting text from that quote, either at the beginning, in the middle, or at the end, an ellipse should be used. Second,
1753:
Yes it might be a good idea to inform the reviewers (or just post a note here); comments above will likely be rendered obsolete by the c/e. Once it's listed on the GOCE requests page, a requested c/e can happen at any time, especially during drives and blitzes, but we usually do them within two
1251:
This article looks very well-researched, well-written, and comprehensive, and I think you've done an exceptionally good job with explaining a subject that would ordinarily be confusing to readers (like me) who haven't seen the film. As far as I can tell, the text is neutral and everything is
306:
says, "Typically, ellipses are used only within a quotation, not at the beginning or at the end of a quotation. A rare exception would be an instance where the sentence could otherwise be misinterpreted." This matches my experience reading
Featured Articles on Knowledge (XXG) such as
1824:
advises against those kinds of templates (they mess with the archives). I just don't want you think I'm vandalizing your posts. Also, thank you so much! The article reads a lot better now, you've done a fantastic job! I'll be pinging everyone back to ask for their reassessment
1124:
Thanks for addressing my concerns! Just that I find the "Release" section the toughest section to present. It's a challenge to have to present one review after another without doing any real editorial weaving like a journalist would. I'm also thinking that
579:
Have you considered restructuring the introduction of 248? Most people would find "a 248 gang member" jarring. What about something like "a member of the gang called 248"? And from thereon, people can understand that there are gangs titled with
2066:
but in fact I hadn't. Yes, still needs source and image reviews and really should have a spotcheck of sources for accuracy and avoidance of close paraphrasing as I believe this is the nominator's first FAC (is that correct?). Cheers,
2228:
Hey Corvoe, thanks; the poster looks fine now. I'd still like the "purpose" portion of the Whalen FUR to do more to justify it: it works really well in the
Costume section, but "to illustrate the subject" doesn't explain that.
1712:. I'll inform the requester Corvoe on his/her talk page and I'll leave a note in my final edit summary when I'm finished. I'll also drop a note here if I remember. Hopefully this will be done by Tuesday night (UTC). Cheers,
1129:
needs to apply to a lot of the quoted fragments here, but I didn't want to go on a series of changes in that regard. Do you think MOS:LQ indicates that the ending quotation mark should be inside the quoted fragments?
1324:
I'm confused about something in the costume design section. The first paragraph says that 245's costumes are based on the
Confederate Army, while the second paragraph says that they are based on the Union.
1734:
Gotta admit, I wasn't the c/e to start any time soon, so I felt fairly safe in nominating it :P I'm okay with putting it on hold. I suppose I could just ping everyone back here for another look through.
1077:
In the plot summary, it says "dies of a 187". I think this needs a brief explanation so readers don't have to click through to understand. Something like "dies abruptly as a result of losing the game".
105:
included is all-encompassing, noting many opinions of both the filmmakers and their critics, as well as a large amount of facts about the film. Hopefully you think it's worthy of FA status as well!
987:. The guidelines do state that "prominence of placement" is a factor, and to be frank, I think film critics, not the filmmakers, need to have the "last word" as independent evaluators of the work.
714:
In "Release", the second sentence is a pretty long serial sentence that's hard to read. Maybe convert that sentence into a list of bullet points identifying each festival and the screening date?
2095:
I did the source review regarding citations. I do not feel qualified as of yet to do the source review regarding images. The citation source review revealed no close paraphrasing issues.
2250:
I'm actually not sure how to change that. That's the default wording of the template, if I'm not mistaken. I can copy over the template's raw formatting and expand that, I suppose.
2365:
as he mentions) is. I mean, worst case scenario, we can remove that section, but I think
Stasukevich's reliability trumps the site's lack of it. I could also be grossly misreading
1188:. Every item which needs to be cited, is. The editor has gone to great lengths to provide the article with appropriate pictures, and the article's length is also appropriate.
1041:
I'm a bit iffy on adding the "Tugg" thing, since it isn't very notable at all. I'll extract some stuff from the NY Times article when I get back home, and I took some info from
1530:– this text in the image caption doesn't seem to match up with the text, which simply says "somewhat transsexual, though it is more prominent in her father's character".
1676:
All of the above changes have been made. Overall, it's a clearly written, thorough and well-referenced article, and IMO one that fulfils the FA criteria. Well done.
929:
I see a variety of minor improvements that I can go ahead and make when I have time. Let me know if you have any questions. Nice work so far on a pretty indie film!
721:
Didn't use bullet points, opted to remove the screening date and just mention the festival, with special mention to the
Rolling Roadshow, as it was in Frazier Park.
1088:
I'd like to give the "Release" section a good look, then after that and your replies to my above questions, I'll likely support this for the FA nomination. Thanks,
1270:
Good catch on that. I altered that sentence recently to add some clarity on what a "187" was, and forgot to adjust the previous sentence. Should read better now.
1012:
40:
1152:
when I first wrote this section. Two of the quotes actually should have the punctuation inside the quotation marks, but otherwise, you're right. Good catch!
1358:
148:
supports this use. I think for this kind of article, an ellipsis should be used in the midst of quoting something, like to skip some extraneous wording.
242:, my impression is that ellipses are used within quoted text, not before and after it. I have not seen this before-and-after use elsewhere. Looking at
1258:
The leader of the 245 gang, L Dubba E, battles and defeats the leader of the 248 gang, BTRO. L Dubba E defeats BTRO, who abruptly dies as a result.
30:
17:
1045:
already. The one mentioning an $ 80,000 budget is interesting, not sure how reliable it is though. Good info on filming too, thank you for these!
1106:
I think I've corrected everything you mentioned, even did a little more trimming to the plot. What's striking you about the "Release" section?
337:, the two major styles of grammar in the US (I know there is a difference for British English), are MLA and Chicago. The references would be
474:
Frazier Park is only linked in the second use. Why not link it earlier? Also, maybe mention in the "Plot" section that it is in
California?
140:
Hello, here are my comments for this article. It is mostly focused on the writing since the article seems well-rounded content-wise.
1000:
1217:), and the free media used in this article is especially welcome for an article on a copyrighted work. Length is also appropriate.
809:
Changed to "some" for now, I may have removed other references to it when I first wrote the section. It was mostly the eye patch.
302:
says, "It is rarely necessary to use ellipsis points at the beginning of a quotation, even if the quotation begins mid-sentence."
1252:
consistently cited. There's just a small handful of things that I would like to see addressed before supporting this nomination:
427:"Additional cast members" sentence in "Cast" section shouldn't use semicolons after each name. They should be replaced by commas.
2359:, as it blatantly says that it relies on rumour and personal opinion. However, the interviewer, Iain Stasukevich (who works for
1775:
Yeah, I probably should've removed it before nominating this, haha. Oh well. Thank you for the copy-editing! It's looking good.
1432:
Now that the above concerns have all been addressed, I believe this article meets the FA criteria and support its promotion. --
990:
On a separate note, I've been searching for other possible sources to use in the article. One way I've done this is to search
246:(further down), the examples do not use ellipses since nothing is being omitted from the beginning to end of the quoted text.
98:, a very inexpensive, largely unknown film that is a personal favourite of mine. The film focuses on gangs that fight using a
1080:
In the "Cast" section, what does "he first did it" mean for Valmassy? Shaved his head to look like Mr. T? Danced in a scene?
1262:
The leader of the 245 gang, L Dubba E, battles and defeats the leader of the 248 gang, BTRO, who abruptly dies as a result.
996:
1473:
It was previously "came up with". Just copied the lead's wording of "conceived" unless I can think of an alternative.
2422:
2400:
2382:
2338:
2292:
2278:
2263:
2238:
2223:
2193:
2163:
2137:
2104:
2076:
2057:
2031:
2004:
1980:
1958:
1936:
1896:
1883:
Thanks for the notice. I will take a look tomorrow. Just got home from being out of town, so I'll be resting today.
1874:
1807:
1788:
1763:
1748:
1721:
1685:
1665:
1639:
1622:
1589:
1564:
1550:
1518:
1486:
1441:
1421:
1402:
1385:
1344:
1315:
1283:
1230:
1201:
1165:
1143:
1119:
1101:
1058:
1028:
972:
942:
921:
877:
833:
785:
745:
705:
665:
611:
568:
531:
458:
406:
354:
324:
285:
259:
230:
187:
118:
86:
1932:
1892:
1226:
1139:
1097:
1024:
938:
320:
255:
544:
fixed it between you posted these comments and me seeing them. Disregard that last message. It's fixed, though :P
2356:
2361:
1803:
1759:
1717:
1696:
504:
1083:
In "Costume design", for which character does "boots worn in the film" apply? All of them? Just one character?
674:
How about getting rid of the "Design and effects" heading and elevating "Costume design" and "Visual effects"?
2268:
Figured it out, it was a parameter I just didn't have active. I think the purpose of use reads better now.
378:
1505:
Copy-editing issue. It originally read "came up with", I must have forgotten to remove the "with". Fixed.
100:
2387:
Okay. I think that explanation makes sense - if the author is an expert we can treat it as an acceptable
2146:, didn't realise you'd looked over sources for accuracy and avoidance of close paraphrasing, thank you.
1464:
Jason Trost got the idea for The FP when he was 16 years old and regularly played Dance Dance Revolution
2063:
298:
says, "Do not place an ellipsis at the beginning of a quotation to indicate the omission of material."
1798:
I've now finished the copy-edit earlier than I expected; feel free to continue the FA Review. Cheers,
303:
2396:
2334:
2288:
2234:
2189:
2027:
1357:
phrase in the first paragraph of critical response, just because the word "note" is listed under the
1185:
1815:
1799:
1770:
1755:
1729:
1713:
1692:
1302:
Ditto to the last one, edited for clarity and failed to adjust the rest. You're a real life saver!
799:
2159:
2100:
2072:
1954:
1602:
It seems like it would be relevant to include the budget somewhere within the production section.
1197:
350:
308:
281:
226:
984:
886:
In "Home media", the first sentence can have a more active voice, "Image Entertainment released
623:
295:
1295:
The word "ensues" should probably be removed (it's in the fifth paragraph of the plot section).
1210:
2377:
2276:
2258:
2218:
2132:
2052:
1869:
1783:
1743:
1660:
1617:
1584:
1545:
1513:
1481:
1416:
1380:
1339:
1310:
1278:
1256:
The first paragraph of the plot section contains two sentences that are a little redundant:
1160:
1114:
1053:
956:
905:
861:
817:
769:
729:
689:
649:
595:
552:
515:
489:
442:
401:
171:
113:
81:
2388:
1821:
1609:
I initially included the budget in the box office section, but I see your point. Moved it.
2392:
2349:
2330:
2284:
2245:
2230:
2204:
2185:
2149:
2083:
2039:
2023:
1976:
1681:
1635:
1560:
1459:
After making some (very minor) changes to the article myself, I just have a few comments.
1331:
Typo, thank you. The 248 are Union, 245 is Confederate. That was an oversight on my part.
541:
294:
I've been searching around and don't see anything that says to use ellipses at the start.
2366:
2326:
2044:
Negative. No one has done a source review or an image review, at least not on this page.
2420:
2369:
and if that's the case, I'll try to find another source that includes the information.
2000:
1928:
1917:
1888:
1576:
I could've sworn I did it. Huh. It's fixed now, for what it's worth. I double checked.
1437:
1398:
1222:
1135:
1093:
1020:
934:
316:
251:
979:
minor film (as opposed to a classic one). I can't imagine a case where filmmakers are
2155:
2143:
2119:
2111:
2096:
2068:
2062:
Ugh, I had a note to myself about this one and thought I'd left a message here or at
1950:
1840:
1193:
496:
365:
346:
277:
239:
222:
156:
134:
53:
381:
out the window for a minute, and pull in the two film FAs that first came to mind:
299:
218:
209:
160:
145:
2322:
1913:
and have no issues with it. My support still stands. And I will have to keep the
1148:
They should definitely all have the punctuation outside of the quotes. I misread
2371:
2315:"United States" is rather broad for publication location - possible to add city?
2270:
2252:
2212:
2126:
2090:
2046:
2022:
Have I missed the source review (for formatting and reliability in particular)?
1863:
1777:
1737:
1654:
1611:
1578:
1539:
1507:
1475:
1410:
1374:
1333:
1304:
1272:
1189:
1154:
1108:
1069:
1047:
950:
899:
855:
843:
811:
794:
The John Carpenter picture states "Many critics" but I only see Kohn mentioning
763:
723:
683:
643:
589:
546:
509:
500:
492:
436:
395:
201:
165:
107:
75:
212:. And they really don't leave a whole lot of room for interpretation. First,
1972:
1856:
1677:
1647:
1631:
1571:
1556:
1453:
389:
2154:
could we trouble you for a source review for formatting/reliability? Cheers,
2407:
1996:
1924:
1884:
1848:
1832:
1433:
1394:
1242:
1218:
1131:
1089:
1036:
1016:
930:
372:
334:
312:
270:
247:
213:
205:
197:
130:
754:
In "Box office", "picked up" is slangish and can be replaced by "acquired".
1214:
204:! The two MOS guidelines which (in my humble opinion) apply here are
2181:
File:The_FP.jpg: source link is dead and FUR should be more expansive
1528:
Sarah Trost designed his character to look as transsexual as possible
1149:
1126:
243:
64:
39:
Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in
2405:
Good to hear! Thank you for both reviews, you've been a huge help!
2124:
I completely forgot about that, my mistake! Thank you, by the way.
1466:– to me, "got the idea" reads pretty poorly and could be reworded.
383:
1003:. In addition, it looks like Frazier Park's weekly newspaper is
983:
defensive of their work, and I'm not sure if their response is
2184:
File:Sean_Whalen_in_the_FP.png: FUR should be more expansive.
1630:
Other than that, I can see no other issues with the article.
155:
Done for now. Those ellipses were based on a suggestion from
1498:– is there an extra word here? It doesn't make sense to me.
1995:
I also reaffirm my support for the article's promotion. --
1293:
triggering a long gunfight between the 248 and 245 ensues.
1074:
I'm re-reading the article, and here are a few questions:
311:. I really don't think that's a standard approach to use.
2210:
tell me if there's anything else you think I should do.
622:
The term "came up" is used a couple of times and may be
1910:
1709:
144:
There are too many uses of ellipses, and I don't think
57:
846:, sentence-fragment-only captions don't need periods
503:. The film focuses on two gangs battling to control
159:, who I think disagrees with your interpretation of
2116:No worries! And yes, this is in fact my first FAC.
1496:and what the Trost brothers thought of with on set
1361:. The word is used again in the fourth paragraph (
626:. Maybe replace these with more formal variations?
2436:The above discussion is preserved as an archive.
798:and Tobias mentioning Carpenter. It might be too
41:Knowledge (XXG) talk:Featured article candidates
43:. No further edits should be made to this page.
1359:Knowledge (XXG):Manual of Style/Words to watch
2442:No further edits should be made to this page.
29:The following is an archived discussion of a
8:
1408:Thank you for all of the helpful comments!
343:MLA Handbook for Writers of Research Papers
18:Knowledge (XXG):Featured article candidates
2015:Note regarding image and paraphrase review
1555:Looks like this hasn't been addressed...?
482:It's linked in its first use, isn't it? "
163:. I guess I'll let you two discuss that.
1820:I've removed the "done" template, since
1909:I've reviewed the copy-editing changes
1363:noting the influence of John Carpenter
7:
842:Also, regarding image captions, per
1971:As am I -- the changes look great.
1372:Changed both to "address(ing/ed)".
24:
1009:site:mountainenterprise.com trost
587:I had not, but I'll do that now.
1447:Comments from 97198 (addressed)
1236:Comments from 1ST7 (addressed)
124:Comments from Erik (addressed)
1:
2327:high-quality reliable source
2318:FN15: publisher/distributor?
1949:I'm fine with the changes.
1708:until then. The request is
1260:I recommend altering it to
1192:has done an excellent job.
339:The Chicago Manual of Style
31:featured article nomination
2459:
2423:17:09, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
2401:16:24, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
2383:02:27, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
2339:23:31, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
2293:16:24, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
2279:16:40, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
2264:02:27, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
2239:23:31, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
2224:03:24, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
2194:22:52, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
2164:11:11, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
2138:01:35, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
2105:23:13, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
2077:22:01, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
2058:17:28, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
2032:16:27, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
1959:22:20, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
1897:19:03, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
1875:04:01, 28 June 2014 (UTC)
1808:02:16, 28 June 2014 (UTC)
1789:02:13, 28 June 2014 (UTC)
1764:21:07, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
1749:20:34, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
1722:20:18, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
1686:13:02, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
1666:15:37, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
1640:14:02, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
1623:15:37, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
1590:12:07, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
1565:07:46, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
1551:15:37, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
1519:15:37, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
1487:15:37, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
1442:18:27, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
1422:17:20, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
1403:16:54, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
1386:17:20, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
1353:I recommend altering the
1345:17:20, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
1316:17:20, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
1284:17:20, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
1231:20:07, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
1202:01:01, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
1166:19:41, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
1144:19:19, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
1120:19:06, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
1102:19:01, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
1059:18:42, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
1029:15:56, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
973:11:50, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
948:Thank you so much, Erik!
943:02:56, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
922:11:50, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
878:11:50, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
834:11:50, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
786:11:50, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
746:11:50, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
706:11:50, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
666:11:50, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
612:11:50, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
569:11:52, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
532:11:50, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
459:11:50, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
407:13:44, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
355:17:44, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
325:16:08, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
286:15:48, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
260:14:14, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
231:13:58, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
188:11:50, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
2439:Please do not modify it.
2362:American Cinematographer
2005:16:43, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
1981:13:01, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
1937:15:49, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
995:. With this, I've found
495:written and directed by
119:14:37, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
87:14:37, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
36:Please do not modify it.
1452:Resolved comments from
1355:He noted the references
1241:Resolved comments from
129:Resolved comments from
2311:- spotchecks not done
101:Dance Dance Revolution
94:This article is about
2389:self-published source
2283:Definitely, thanks.
1007:, and searching for
992:site:<domain: -->
796:Escape from New York
467:In the lead section:
56:19:16, 25 July 2014
1652:Thank you so much!
1537:Good catch, fixed.
1043:Mountain Enterprise
1005:Mountain Enterprise
488:is a 2011 American
333:Again, I hear you,
309:intelligent design
90:
2450:
2441:
2418:
2410:
2380:
2374:
2353:
2273:
2261:
2255:
2249:
2221:
2215:
2208:
2153:
2135:
2129:
2123:
2115:
2094:
2087:
2055:
2049:
2043:
1922:
1916:
1872:
1866:
1860:
1852:
1844:
1836:
1819:
1786:
1780:
1774:
1754:months. Cheers,
1746:
1740:
1733:
1663:
1657:
1651:
1620:
1614:
1587:
1581:
1575:
1548:
1542:
1516:
1510:
1484:
1478:
1419:
1413:
1393:Best of luck, --
1383:
1377:
1342:
1336:
1313:
1307:
1281:
1275:
1163:
1157:
1117:
1111:
1073:
1056:
1050:
1040:
967:
959:
953:
916:
908:
902:
872:
864:
858:
828:
820:
814:
780:
772:
766:
740:
732:
726:
700:
692:
686:
660:
652:
646:
606:
598:
592:
563:
555:
549:
526:
518:
512:
453:
445:
439:
404:
398:
377:I'm gonna throw
376:
369:
274:
182:
174:
168:
116:
110:
84:
78:
71:
48:The article was
38:
2458:
2457:
2453:
2452:
2451:
2449:
2448:
2447:
2446:
2437:
2414:
2408:
2378:
2372:
2357:WP:QUESTIONABLE
2347:
2271:
2259:
2253:
2243:
2219:
2213:
2202:
2147:
2133:
2127:
2117:
2109:
2088:
2081:
2053:
2047:
2037:
2017:
1920:
1914:
1870:
1864:
1854:
1846:
1838:
1830:
1813:
1784:
1778:
1768:
1744:
1738:
1727:
1701:
1671:
1670:
1661:
1655:
1645:
1618:
1612:
1585:
1579:
1569:
1546:
1540:
1514:
1508:
1482:
1476:
1456:
1449:
1427:
1426:
1417:
1411:
1381:
1375:
1340:
1334:
1311:
1305:
1279:
1273:
1245:
1238:
1209:as meeting the
1179:
1178:
1161:
1155:
1115:
1109:
1067:
1054:
1048:
1034:
965:
957:
951:
914:
906:
900:
870:
862:
856:
826:
818:
812:
778:
770:
764:
738:
730:
724:
698:
690:
684:
658:
650:
644:
637:the idea" and "
604:
596:
590:
561:
553:
547:
524:
516:
510:
451:
443:
437:
402:
396:
370:
363:
268:
180:
172:
166:
137:
126:
114:
108:
82:
76:
68:
34:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
2456:
2454:
2445:
2444:
2432:
2431:
2430:
2429:
2428:
2427:
2426:
2425:
2342:
2341:
2319:
2316:
2306:
2305:
2304:
2303:
2302:
2301:
2300:
2299:
2298:
2297:
2296:
2295:
2197:
2196:
2182:
2173:
2172:
2171:
2170:
2169:
2168:
2167:
2166:
2079:
2016:
2013:
2012:
2011:
2010:
2009:
2008:
2007:
1988:
1987:
1986:
1985:
1984:
1983:
1964:
1963:
1962:
1961:
1944:
1943:
1942:
1941:
1940:
1939:
1902:
1901:
1900:
1899:
1878:
1877:
1827:
1826:
1816:Baffle gab1978
1800:Baffle gab1978
1796:
1795:
1794:
1793:
1792:
1791:
1771:Baffle gab1978
1756:Baffle gab1978
1730:Baffle gab1978
1714:Baffle gab1978
1700:
1693:Baffle gab1978
1689:
1669:
1668:
1628:
1627:
1626:
1625:
1604:
1603:
1599:
1598:
1597:
1596:
1595:
1594:
1593:
1592:
1532:
1531:
1524:
1523:
1522:
1521:
1500:
1499:
1492:
1491:
1490:
1489:
1468:
1467:
1457:
1451:
1450:
1448:
1445:
1425:
1424:
1391:
1390:
1389:
1388:
1367:
1366:
1350:
1349:
1348:
1347:
1326:
1325:
1321:
1320:
1319:
1318:
1297:
1296:
1289:
1288:
1287:
1286:
1265:
1264:
1246:
1240:
1239:
1237:
1234:
1177:
1176:
1175:
1174:
1173:
1172:
1171:
1170:
1169:
1168:
1086:
1085:
1084:
1081:
1078:
1062:
1061:
1015:to be vetted.
976:
975:
927:
926:
925:
924:
892:
891:
883:
882:
881:
880:
848:
847:
839:
838:
837:
836:
804:
803:
802:to state that.
791:
790:
789:
788:
756:
755:
751:
750:
749:
748:
716:
715:
711:
710:
709:
708:
676:
675:
671:
670:
669:
668:
628:
627:
619:
618:
617:
616:
615:
614:
582:
581:
576:
575:
574:
573:
572:
571:
536:
535:
476:
475:
469:
468:
464:
463:
462:
461:
429:
428:
424:
423:
422:
421:
420:
419:
418:
417:
416:
415:
414:
413:
412:
411:
410:
409:
358:
357:
328:
327:
289:
288:
263:
262:
234:
233:
191:
190:
150:
149:
138:
128:
127:
125:
122:
92:
91:
73:Nominator(s):
67:
62:
61:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2455:
2443:
2440:
2434:
2433:
2424:
2421:
2417:
2412:
2411:
2404:
2403:
2402:
2398:
2394:
2390:
2386:
2385:
2384:
2381:
2379:(speak to me)
2376:
2375:
2368:
2364:
2363:
2358:
2351:
2346:
2345:
2344:
2343:
2340:
2336:
2332:
2328:
2324:
2320:
2317:
2314:
2313:
2312:
2310:
2309:Source review
2294:
2290:
2286:
2282:
2281:
2280:
2277:
2275:
2274:
2267:
2266:
2265:
2262:
2260:(speak to me)
2257:
2256:
2247:
2242:
2241:
2240:
2236:
2232:
2227:
2226:
2225:
2222:
2220:(speak to me)
2217:
2216:
2206:
2201:
2200:
2199:
2198:
2195:
2191:
2187:
2183:
2180:
2179:
2178:
2177:
2165:
2161:
2157:
2151:
2145:
2141:
2140:
2139:
2136:
2134:(speak to me)
2131:
2130:
2121:
2113:
2108:
2107:
2106:
2102:
2098:
2092:
2085:
2080:
2078:
2074:
2070:
2065:
2061:
2060:
2059:
2056:
2054:(speak to me)
2051:
2050:
2041:
2036:
2035:
2034:
2033:
2029:
2025:
2021:
2014:
2006:
2002:
1998:
1994:
1993:
1992:
1991:
1990:
1989:
1982:
1978:
1974:
1970:
1969:
1968:
1967:
1966:
1965:
1960:
1956:
1952:
1948:
1947:
1946:
1945:
1938:
1934:
1930:
1926:
1923:use in mind!
1919:
1912:
1908:
1907:
1906:
1905:
1904:
1903:
1898:
1894:
1890:
1886:
1882:
1881:
1880:
1879:
1876:
1873:
1871:(speak to me)
1868:
1867:
1858:
1850:
1842:
1834:
1829:
1828:
1823:
1817:
1812:
1811:
1810:
1809:
1805:
1801:
1790:
1787:
1785:(speak to me)
1782:
1781:
1772:
1767:
1766:
1765:
1761:
1757:
1752:
1751:
1750:
1747:
1745:(speak to me)
1742:
1741:
1731:
1726:
1725:
1724:
1723:
1719:
1715:
1711:
1707:
1698:
1694:
1691:Comment from
1690:
1688:
1687:
1683:
1679:
1675:
1667:
1664:
1662:(speak to me)
1659:
1658:
1649:
1644:
1643:
1642:
1641:
1637:
1633:
1624:
1621:
1619:(speak to me)
1616:
1615:
1608:
1607:
1606:
1605:
1601:
1600:
1591:
1588:
1586:(speak to me)
1583:
1582:
1573:
1568:
1567:
1566:
1562:
1558:
1554:
1553:
1552:
1549:
1547:(speak to me)
1544:
1543:
1536:
1535:
1534:
1533:
1529:
1526:
1525:
1520:
1517:
1515:(speak to me)
1512:
1511:
1504:
1503:
1502:
1501:
1497:
1494:
1493:
1488:
1485:
1483:(speak to me)
1480:
1479:
1472:
1471:
1470:
1469:
1465:
1462:
1461:
1460:
1455:
1446:
1444:
1443:
1439:
1435:
1431:
1423:
1420:
1418:(speak to me)
1415:
1414:
1407:
1406:
1405:
1404:
1400:
1396:
1387:
1384:
1382:(speak to me)
1379:
1378:
1371:
1370:
1369:
1368:
1364:
1360:
1356:
1352:
1351:
1346:
1343:
1341:(speak to me)
1338:
1337:
1330:
1329:
1328:
1327:
1323:
1322:
1317:
1314:
1312:(speak to me)
1309:
1308:
1301:
1300:
1299:
1298:
1294:
1291:
1290:
1285:
1282:
1280:(speak to me)
1277:
1276:
1269:
1268:
1267:
1266:
1263:
1259:
1255:
1254:
1253:
1250:
1244:
1235:
1233:
1232:
1228:
1224:
1220:
1216:
1212:
1208:
1204:
1203:
1199:
1195:
1191:
1187:
1183:
1167:
1164:
1162:(speak to me)
1159:
1158:
1151:
1147:
1146:
1145:
1141:
1137:
1133:
1128:
1123:
1122:
1121:
1118:
1116:(speak to me)
1113:
1112:
1105:
1104:
1103:
1099:
1095:
1091:
1087:
1082:
1079:
1076:
1075:
1071:
1066:
1065:
1064:
1063:
1060:
1057:
1055:(speak to me)
1052:
1051:
1044:
1038:
1033:
1032:
1031:
1030:
1026:
1022:
1018:
1014:
1013:these results
1010:
1006:
1002:
998:
994:
988:
986:
982:
974:
970:
968:
961:/ Comment on
960:
958:(speak to me)
955:
954:
947:
946:
945:
944:
940:
936:
932:
923:
919:
917:
910:/ Comment on
909:
907:(speak to me)
904:
903:
896:
895:
894:
893:
889:
885:
884:
879:
875:
873:
866:/ Comment on
865:
863:(speak to me)
860:
859:
852:
851:
850:
849:
845:
841:
840:
835:
831:
829:
822:/ Comment on
821:
819:(speak to me)
816:
815:
808:
807:
806:
805:
801:
797:
793:
792:
787:
783:
781:
774:/ Comment on
773:
771:(speak to me)
768:
767:
760:
759:
758:
757:
753:
752:
747:
743:
741:
734:/ Comment on
733:
731:(speak to me)
728:
727:
720:
719:
718:
717:
713:
712:
707:
703:
701:
694:/ Comment on
693:
691:(speak to me)
688:
687:
680:
679:
678:
677:
673:
672:
667:
663:
661:
654:/ Comment on
653:
651:(speak to me)
648:
647:
640:
636:
632:
631:
630:
629:
625:
621:
620:
613:
609:
607:
600:/ Comment on
599:
597:(speak to me)
594:
593:
586:
585:
584:
583:
578:
577:
570:
566:
564:
557:/ Comment on
556:
554:(speak to me)
551:
550:
543:
540:
539:
538:
537:
534:
533:
529:
527:
520:/ Comment on
519:
517:(speak to me)
514:
513:
507:(The FP)..."
506:
502:
498:
494:
491:
487:
486:
480:
479:
478:
477:
473:
472:
471:
470:
466:
465:
460:
456:
454:
447:/ Comment on
446:
444:(speak to me)
441:
440:
433:
432:
431:
430:
426:
425:
408:
405:
403:(speak to me)
400:
399:
392:
391:
386:
385:
380:
379:WP:OTHERSTUFF
374:
367:
362:
361:
360:
359:
356:
352:
348:
344:
340:
336:
332:
331:
330:
329:
326:
322:
318:
314:
310:
305:
301:
297:
293:
292:
291:
290:
287:
283:
279:
272:
267:
266:
265:
264:
261:
257:
253:
249:
245:
241:
238:
237:
236:
235:
232:
228:
224:
220:
215:
211:
207:
203:
199:
195:
194:
193:
192:
189:
185:
183:
176:/ Comment on
175:
173:(speak to me)
170:
169:
162:
158:
154:
153:
152:
151:
147:
143:
142:
141:
136:
132:
123:
121:
120:
117:
115:(speak to me)
112:
111:
103:
102:
97:
89:
88:
85:
83:(speak to me)
80:
79:
70:
69:
66:
63:
60:
58:
55:
51:
44:
42:
37:
32:
27:
26:
19:
2438:
2435:
2415:
2413:(previously
2406:
2370:
2360:
2308:
2307:
2269:
2251:
2211:
2176:Image review
2175:
2174:
2125:
2045:
2019:
2018:
1862:
1797:
1776:
1736:
1705:
1702:
1673:
1672:
1653:
1629:
1610:
1577:
1538:
1527:
1506:
1495:
1474:
1463:
1458:
1429:
1428:
1409:
1392:
1373:
1362:
1354:
1332:
1303:
1292:
1271:
1261:
1257:
1248:
1247:
1206:
1205:
1181:
1180:
1153:
1107:
1046:
1042:
1008:
1004:
991:
989:
980:
977:
963:
962:
949:
928:
912:
911:
898:
887:
868:
867:
854:
824:
823:
810:
795:
776:
775:
762:
736:
735:
722:
696:
695:
682:
656:
655:
642:
638:
634:
633:Changed to "
602:
601:
588:
559:
558:
545:
522:
521:
508:
505:Frazier Park
484:
483:
481:
449:
448:
435:
394:
388:
382:
342:
338:
219:MOS:ELLIPSIS
210:MOS:ELLIPSIS
178:
177:
164:
161:MOS:ELLIPSIS
146:MOS:ELLIPSIS
139:
106:
99:
95:
93:
74:
72:
49:
47:
35:
28:
2321:What makes
2142:Apologies,
2024:Graham Colm
1211:FA criteria
1190:User:Corvoe
844:MOS:CAPTION
501:Jason Trost
493:comedy film
490:independent
202:User:Corvoe
2393:Nikkimaria
2350:Nikkimaria
2331:Nikkimaria
2285:Nikkimaria
2246:Nikkimaria
2231:Nikkimaria
2205:Nikkimaria
2186:Nikkimaria
2150:Nikkimaria
2084:GrahamColm
2040:GrahamColm
1186:WP:MOSFILM
985:due weight
639:thought of
542:NathanWubs
390:Fight Club
1249:Comments.
641:on set".
214:MOS:QUOTE
206:MOS:QUOTE
198:User:Erik
2156:Ian Rose
2144:Onel5969
2120:Onel5969
2112:Ian Rose
2097:Onel5969
2069:Ian Rose
1951:Onel5969
1841:Onel5969
1430:Support.
1215:MOS:FILM
1194:Onel5969
993:fp trost
969:s FA nom
918:s FA nom
874:s FA nom
830:s FA nom
782:s FA nom
742:s FA nom
702:s FA nom
662:s FA nom
624:slangish
608:s FA nom
580:numbers.
565:s FA nom
528:s FA nom
455:s FA nom
366:Onel5969
347:Onel5969
341:and the
278:Onel5969
240:Onel5969
223:Onel5969
184:s FA nom
157:Onel5969
135:Onel5969
54:Ian Rose
50:promoted
1933:contrib
1893:contrib
1706:on hold
1674:Support
1227:contrib
1207:Support
1182:Support
1140:contrib
1098:contrib
1025:contrib
939:contrib
853:Fixed.
800:weasely
761:Fixed.
497:Brandon
321:contrib
256:contrib
2416:Corvoe
2373:Corvoe
2272:Corvoe
2254:Corvoe
2214:Corvoe
2128:Corvoe
2091:Corvoe
2064:WT:FAC
2048:Corvoe
1865:Corvoe
1822:WP:FAC
1779:Corvoe
1739:Corvoe
1656:Corvoe
1613:Corvoe
1580:Corvoe
1541:Corvoe
1509:Corvoe
1477:Corvoe
1412:Corvoe
1376:Corvoe
1335:Corvoe
1306:Corvoe
1274:Corvoe
1156:Corvoe
1150:MOS:LQ
1127:MOS:LQ
1110:Corvoe
1070:Corvoe
1049:Corvoe
1011:shows
964:The FP
952:Corvoe
913:The FP
901:Corvoe
897:Done.
888:The FP
869:The FP
857:Corvoe
825:The FP
813:Corvoe
777:The FP
765:Corvoe
737:The FP
725:Corvoe
697:The FP
685:Corvoe
681:Done.
657:The FP
645:Corvoe
603:The FP
591:Corvoe
560:The FP
548:Corvoe
523:The FP
511:Corvoe
485:The FP
450:The FP
438:Corvoe
434:Done.
397:Corvoe
244:MOS:LQ
179:The FP
167:Corvoe
109:Corvoe
96:The FP
77:Corvoe
65:The FP
2367:WP:RS
1973:97198
1918:mdash
1857:97198
1678:97198
1648:97198
1632:97198
1572:97198
1557:97198
1454:97198
384:Dredd
16:<
2409:Sock
2397:talk
2335:talk
2323:this
2289:talk
2235:talk
2190:talk
2160:talk
2101:talk
2073:talk
2028:talk
2020:Note
2001:talk
1997:1ST7
1977:talk
1955:talk
1929:talk
1925:Erik
1911:here
1889:talk
1885:Erik
1849:1ST7
1833:Erik
1825:now.
1804:talk
1760:talk
1718:talk
1710:here
1697:talk
1682:talk
1636:talk
1561:talk
1438:talk
1434:1ST7
1399:talk
1395:1ST7
1243:1ST7
1223:talk
1219:Erik
1198:talk
1136:talk
1132:Erik
1094:talk
1090:Erik
1037:Erik
1021:talk
1017:Erik
1001:this
999:and
997:this
935:talk
931:Erik
890:..."
499:and
387:and
373:Erik
351:talk
335:Erik
317:talk
313:Erik
304:This
300:This
296:This
282:talk
271:Erik
252:talk
248:Erik
227:talk
208:and
200:and
133:and
131:Erik
1935:)
1895:)
1229:)
1142:)
1100:)
1027:)
981:not
941:)
635:had
323:)
258:)
196:Hi
52:by
2419:)
2399:)
2391:.
2337:)
2329:?
2325:a
2291:)
2237:)
2192:)
2162:)
2103:)
2075:)
2030:)
2003:)
1979:)
1957:)
1931:|
1921:}}
1915:{{
1891:|
1853:,
1845:,
1837:,
1806:)
1762:)
1720:)
1684:)
1638:)
1563:)
1440:)
1401:)
1365:).
1225:|
1200:)
1138:|
1096:|
1023:|
971:!
937:|
920:!
876:!
832:!
784:!
744:!
704:!
664:!
610:!
567:!
530:!
457:!
353:)
319:|
284:)
254:|
229:)
186:!
59:.
33:.
2395:(
2352::
2348:@
2333:(
2287:(
2248::
2244:@
2233:(
2207::
2203:@
2188:(
2158:(
2152::
2148:@
2122::
2118:@
2114::
2110:@
2099:(
2093::
2089:@
2086::
2082:@
2071:(
2042::
2038:@
2026:(
1999:(
1975:(
1953:(
1927:(
1887:(
1859::
1855:@
1851::
1847:@
1843::
1839:@
1835::
1831:@
1818::
1814:@
1802:(
1773::
1769:@
1758:(
1732::
1728:@
1716:(
1699:)
1695:(
1680:(
1650::
1646:@
1634:(
1574::
1570:@
1559:(
1436:(
1397:(
1221:(
1196:(
1134:(
1092:(
1072::
1068:@
1039::
1035:@
1019:(
966:'
933:(
915:'
871:'
827:'
779:'
739:'
699:'
659:'
605:'
562:'
525:'
452:'
375::
371:@
368::
364:@
349:(
315:(
280:(
273::
269:@
250:(
225:(
181:'
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.