104:. This article is on the short side as the character is from the pre-internet era: not only before journalists had any deep analysis of a game's story, but arguably before any game character had enough depth to analyze. But there are enough later reviewers who remember this character as a sort of historic turning point, inspiring a later generation of game developers. I focused the weight of the article on the biggest real-world impact, rather than an exhaustive look of plot details, and feel confident it still meets our comprehensiveness requirements.
448:
compared to solitary predators..." and now I could write "Character X, Y, and Z have stated that their biological lineage is similar to solitary predators..." I do want to improve the clarity, but I think I'm starting to get too pedantic. If you feel that the "Description" section is already implied to be in-universe, then I suspect we can simplify this a lot. What's the simplest way to present their biological evolution as an in-universe fact?
958:
non-commercial license. And when the project was finally made available, they published the licensing info that I linked above. The creators also made their stance clear in public that (direct quote) "our policy has been to let people do whatever they want, as long as they don’t turn our characters into mass murderers or make money with it." I didn't upload the image but it looks like the CC licensing information in the image is correct.
465:
presented to the player as part of the world/story. Apologies for taking a while with this review, and thank you for your patience. The article looks to be in very good shape right now, but I want to read through it one more time to see if I have missed anything so I will post anything further by tomorrow. I hope you had a great weekend!
1300:"Legend seems to be exhausted in the middle. The game lacks the Threat: in the second game, everything bad happened over time, and in the end, the kohr-ahs killed everyone else if the player just sat on their thumb. Now is (apparently) all the time in the world, and when the enemy just sits at home, it does shake the motivation."
1322:
I think if there isn't meaningful expansion potential, then the problem is probably in the phrasing. It's difficult to describe exactly, but it's somewhat choppy, especially the final sentence. The second source does seem to offer the opportunity for a somewhat broader statement than currently given,
850:
I just want to make sure I understand the explanation above re: the lead image. The design elements present in this image are indistinguishable from the original game? How would this avoid copyright issues - did the authorization to produce the game include license to release the graphics as CC? (The
299:
weight on fictional details. But I tried to really clarify some of the plot details, splitting the "Description" section into a "Background" and "Appearances" subsection. I believe this should help distinguish between the characters' backstory, and the events of the game, with context as to what the
325:
Thank for addressing my comments. I will resume my review sometime tomorrow. I agree that it is best to brief with background context, and you have added the right to me (at least from my perspective). I have just one quick comment below, and just for clarity, my review will primarily focus on the
303:
I used the re-written "Description" section to improve the lead, along with some of your other suggestions. I added Alt Text for the images. As an aside, the open source version is maintained by fans, but it's officially authorized by the developers as a faithful reproduction. The image avoids any
1710:
Reading it again, I can see how it's overstated. I re-wrote it so it's clear that the character inspired other similar concepts in those games (the reapers, the battle thralls, the slave shield), rather than making it sound like the entire games were inspired by one character. Hope that's clearer
464:
Thank you for the clarification about this. Since the game presents it as an "accepted fact", then the current wording should be fine. I was more uncertain if this was an observation made by a specific character or group, but the current wording is a better representation of how it is just a fact
361:
Is this comparison made in the game itself? If so, then I would attribute who makes the comparison, and if not, I would move it down to the "Concept and creation" section and attribute who makes this comparison. I look at the "Description" section as being entirely in-universe so that is why I am
1013:
Surprised this doesn't seem to have been raised, but there seems to be an overuse of quotes in the
Reception section. While some quotes are understandable and necessary, having a quote in every sentence is clunky to read. Perhaps take a third of the quotes and paraphrase, and that would make the
919:. When the open source version was created, the original authors released the contents of the game under appropriate public licenses, with the code released under the GNU, and the images and music released under CC. I hope that answers the question and let me know if we need to do anything else.
600:
indeed says "the Ur-Quan are rightfully ranked among gaming’s greatest villains" in the context of their own praise. So I went with a more direct quote about the rankings, even though it's a tricky trade-off. I'm not crazy about excessive quotes, but they help readers to see what reviewers have
447:
The only edit I'm struggling with is the part about their biological evolution, which is presented in the game as an accepted fact. My original phrasing was "Their biological origins are similar to solitary predators..." and I based on your feedback I changed it to "Their biological lineage is
1356:
was developed and written by a different team. Kurt Kalata approved of the game for adding the Ur-Quan to the player's alliance, but lamented their otherwise minimal role. Game magazine Pelit made a similar criticism, that the third game was left lacking a threat as memorable as the Ur-Quan
333:, in the lead. I do not think it is grammatically correct as the beginning phrase is tied to the noun of the next phrase so it reads like you are saying journalists having this menacing and threatening persona, which is obviously not the intention so I would reword this part to avoid this.
957:
It means their involvement has been extensive, yeah. It was their idea to release the game as open source. They worked with the open source community to do it, so it's a combination of the original creators and the wider community. They licensed the code and content on a free, perpetual
891:
So if the images from the original game have been released CC, why not include images from the original game? And if the images from the original game have not been released CC, how could the images from the fan game which are visually indistinguishable have been licensed in that way?
1670:
The review is greatly appreciated. I think I was able to address all the comments, without overriding some of the concerns from previous reviewers. I'm trying not to get too pedantic while still making it clear that their history is fictional. Let me know if there's anything else.
400:
reviewer in the first sentence with this source. Naming the publication in the first sentence and then the reviewer's name in the second sentence seems unnecessarily confusing as I can see a reader thinking they are too separate things and not understanding who
William Hughes
505:
Thank you for the kind words. It is important to remember that we are all volunteers here. I do have a tendency to forget that and it is important to know how to manage time on here. I have not gotten to re-read the article again today, but it is on my list for tomorrow.
279:
and reads like it was written for a reader already familiar with the game. Since I never heard of these games, I was honestly somewhat lost with the story. I will look through the rest of the article once the above comments are addressed. Have a great rest of your week!
1477:
The Ur-Quan are a fictional race of predatory alien caterpillars from the Star
Control video game series - something here is off. Is it "from" the Star Control series? Or, do they appear in the series. I feel a better word for from is required. Best Wishes,
1178:
Thanks for the input. I addressed all your comments. Only exception was the image, which I chose as the one that most resembled the character design in the game. The refs should be properly formatted, and the phrasing fixed, with fewer superfluous links.
233:, who are naturally limited in their social behaviors. Is this mantis comparison made in the context of the game? If not, then I would move it down to the "Concept and creation" part as this section seems to be more focused on their roles in the game.
910:
I'm not sure I understand the question. In the early 2000s, the copyright holders / creators of the original game officially authorized an open source version, and even participated in its creation, so it's not quite accurate to call it a fan game.
1254:
Kurt Kalata approved of the game for adding the Ur-Quan to the player's alliance, but lamented their otherwise minimal role. Game magazine Pelit made a similar criticism, that the third game was left lacking a threat as memorable as the Ur-Quan
1464:, but I will also comment on anything that could be improved. I'll post up some comments below over the next couple days, which you should either respond to, or ask me questions on issues you are unsure of. I'll be claiming points towards the
736:
The
Escapist piece is written by Retro Gamer's John Szczepaniak, who is considered an expert in the industry. The piece focuses on interview material with the developers. It for sure isn't the volunteer-written material we need to be cautious
601:
actually said, and avoid confusion about whether they are reading a
Knowledge (XXG) editor's opinion, or even a misquote. I did shorten some other quotes as you suggested. Either way, I hope I'm moving things in the right direction.
1039:
Went with most of your suggestions. Took out a few quotes – this came up in the GA review and I fixed it a bunch, but I took out a couple more for good measure. Thanks for the review and hopefully it's on its way to FA quality.
990:
Having looked through the article, I don't see any major issues. The image problems are likely to be tackled above, many of the prose issues were corrected above, and the sources seem solid. A few points caught my attention;
1689:
The only outstanding bit I have is that the lede says that the Ur-Quan helped design the games for
Stelaris and Mass Effect. I think that's a bit too generous. Star Fox did this, rather than these characters. Best Wishes,
225:
I am not entirely sure "Background" is the best name for the section as it seems to more so focus on the characters' roles in the game. Something like "Appearances" would seem more accurate to the section's content to
1735:
Eager to wrap this one up and work on more featured articles. That said, I am also patient with this process. The article now has the support of multiple reviewers, including a source and image review. I count 6 or 7
137:
1377:
Doing my best to stay on topic and hit the real point, as this article is really about the Ur-Quan, and not about Star
Control 3's new antagonist. Once we can find a suitable wording, I can re-add it to the article.
200:, as there is really no context about the player or overarching story behind these games. Would it be possible to add something brief (like a single sentence) to clarify how these aliens fit into the player's story?
1567:
The Ur-Quan are an alien race of giant predatory caterpillars. - This is the first part of the body. We need to establish (outside of the lede) that these are not real items, and where they came from. Best Wishes,
1367:
was developed and written by a different team. Kurt Kalata felt that the game failed to give the Ur-Quan a meaningful role, though he praised their transformation into an ally. Similarly, Pelit commented that
413:
quote is needed. The way it is currently used seems a little off to me, especially since it repeats Ur-Quan a few times in the same sentence. I think the quote could be used in a better way, as it is a good
595:
Thanks again. I tried to incorporate all your suggestions. It's a thin line between a filler word and a transition, so I tried to vary the transitions to maintain the flow. I've also tried to be accurate:
444:
Thanks for the suggestions, especially when I introduced a new grammatical error that makes it sound like the journalists have a menacing persona. SMH. Things should be more clear and less repetitive now.
404:
The "Reception" section as a whole seems rather inconsistent with critics' names. Sometimes they are said in the prose while other times they are not. I would be consistent with one approach or another.
715:
380:, twice. This is super minor and admittedly quite nitpick-y, but I would change one of those two instance to avoid repetition as it was something that caught my eye while reading this section.
683:"Red Bull also highlighted the importance of the Ur-Quan in creating the classic game world of Star Control II." - Unsure why the opinion of an energy drink manufacturer would really be
690:
1257:
These wordings are somewhat odd. I particularly wonder if the latter source offers any opportunity to expand here, rather than just give us a rather abrupt and choppy sentence.
1308:
They really are brief mentions for a character demoted to a minor role. There isn't much to expand on, but I'm open to a rephrase if it would make some part of it more clear.
939:
What exactly is meant by the term "authorized"? Does it encompass release of intellectual rights, or no? Or was their participation to the extent to make that a moot point?
794:
Hopefully that covers the sources. I was pretty careful and focused more on quality than quantity. Thanks for the spot check too, and let me know if you see anything else.
1740:
s (depending on whether the image review is supportive or neutral), with zero opposition after 7 weeks. Looking for some feedback from a coordinator when they have time.
733:
Thanks for the review! For the sources, I fixed the first/last formatting, the page numbers, and the links to publishers. As for the quality of the sources themselves:
540:). There are a few other instances of this so I would look through the entire section and change it to past tense as critics' reviews should be done in the past tense.
917:
Here is the same (not identical but nearly indistinguishable) sequence from the open source version, which has been maintained and updated to work with modern systems
295:
Those questions were really useful to help me find the right balance of information. The prior version tried to err on less, since I've seen lots of FA's fail due to
574:
quote is very long, and I do not think it is encouraged to quote that amount of text from a citation. I would instead paraphrase and use the quote more sparingly.
677:, although this may be due to a time frame when they exercised little oversight in '17 and '18; would Escapist's early (2006) work be considered high-quality RS?
40:
1323:
as it appears to be complaining about a general weakness in the antagonists of that game which the Ur-Quan play into by no longer being antagonists.
558:
is deliberately "echoing these rankings" so I would be careful about implying connections between citations/reviewers that may not be entirely true.
427:
These are my comments up to the "Reception" section. I am still going through that part of the article and I will try to get through that tomorrow.
1764:
1287:
Made some quick fixes and glad it looks basically good. The part about their minor role in Star
Control 3 was previously described a direct quote:
30:
17:
1292:"For as menacing as the Ur-Quan were in Star Control II, and how cool it is that they’re on your side in this game, they barely do anything here."
1303:
summarized as: "Game magazine Pelit made a similar criticism, that the third game was left lacking a threat as memorable as the Ur-Quan Kohr-Ah"
869:
Fixed the image, and yes, the images have been released under the
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 license. Here's an
711:
Conducted searches in several places and databases and found no indication that there is sizeable scholarly literature that has been omitted.
1295:
summarized as: "Kurt Kalata approved of the game for adding the Ur-Quan to the player's alliance, but lamented their otherwise minimal role."
1775:
1645:
870:
873:
to the open source project's FAQ. (A really inconvenient time for the site to be down.) Let me know if you have any other questions.
1504:
Their story is expanded in the sequel - we've already said the first two games, so the sequel would be the third game. Best Wishes,
661:
Some consistency issues here - sometimes authors are listed as Last, First other times as First Last. This should be consistent.
222:, I would clarify in the prose who is doing the praising. I am assuming that it is critics, but it would be nice to be specific.
532:
Everything in the "Reception" section should be in past tense. Here are some instances where things are in present tense (
1094:"During Star Control II,.." is that the "sequel" mentioned in the previous sentence? I'd link it there. If not, what
1794:
1749:
1720:
1698:
1680:
1657:
1632:
1615:
1607:
If there are authors of a piece in reception, please state who they are in prose. Magazines can't write. Best Wishes,
1602:
1589:
1576:
1555:
1542:
1529:
1512:
1499:
1486:
1436:
1417:
1403:
1387:
1334:
1317:
1274:
1234:
1208:
1188:
1163:
1074:
1049:
1033:
967:
948:
928:
901:
882:
860:
831:
817:
803:
758:. I can understand how seeing "RedBull" could be odd at first glance, but they have robust involvement with games now.
727:
655:
636:
610:
587:
515:
496:
474:
457:
436:
342:
331:
Besides their menacing and threatening persona, journalists have praised them for their surprising depth and humanity.
316:
289:
113:
90:
1460:
I'll begin a review of this article very soon! My reviews tend to focus on prose and MOS issues, especially on the
1431:
1398:
1329:
1269:
1229:
1203:
1158:
778:
264:, I was left wondering what this war was. I would provide more context to readers who know nothing about this game.
229:
I am confused about this sentence: Their biological origins are similar to solitary predators such as the praying
487:
and all your work is appreciated. Looking forward to wrapping your suggested revisions up whenever you're ready.
387:
needs a wikilink as it seems like a universally understood concept. With that being said, I think a wikilink for
750:
693:- suggests that PikiGeek is at least somewhat reliable, but does it meet the higher "high-quality RS" standard?
215:. Could it be possible to either clarify the time period or provide examples of these games (or possible both)?
1534:
The lede should probably mention a bit more that they were used to help with Mass Effect et al. Best Wishes,
687:
for an article about a video game character, unless Red Bull has dabblings into video games I'm not aware of.
1745:
1716:
1676:
1413:
1383:
1313:
1184:
1045:
1003:
963:
924:
878:
827:
799:
788:
606:
492:
453:
312:
109:
86:
1790:
1621:
781:
768:
I removed the 1MoreCastle reference. There's some evidence of editorial review, but it's less than clear.
484:
1741:
1712:
1672:
1426:
1409:
1393:
1379:
1341:
1324:
1309:
1282:
1264:
1224:
1198:
1180:
1173:
1153:
1056:
1041:
1021:
959:
920:
874:
823:
795:
602:
488:
449:
308:
105:
82:
1547:
Infobox suggests they have appeared in titles for over 20 years, probably worth a mention Best Wishes,
271:, as the article does not establish who the player is and their relationship in regards to the Ur-Quan.
161:
As someone who has never played (or really heard of these games), I am not really sure what this part,
391:
would be helpful as I can see some readers hearing the term but not fully knowing what is referencing.
1070:
1029:
944:
897:
856:
419:
237:
1768:
1017:
Perhaps include citations in image captions with statements, but I don't think this is compulsory.
999:. It is the drink specifically commenting on this, or the company? Not clear from the simple link.
762:
578:
After my above comments are completed, I believe I should be ready to support based on the prose.
1755:
Oops. Try {{@FAC}} to attract our attention. There does indeed seem to be a consensus. Promoting.
813:
723:
651:
296:
667:
For Barton 2016 you have the page range as " pp. 203–", you seem to be missing the second page.
1786:
1705:
1692:
1665:
1651:
1626:
1609:
1596:
1583:
1570:
1549:
1536:
1523:
1506:
1493:
1480:
1454:
53:
1581:
Again to this, I thnk an explainatory concept paragraph would be super helpful. Best Wishes,
1461:
674:
156:
an intelligent race of giant predatory caterpillars, leaders of a hierarchy of battle thralls
632:
583:
511:
470:
432:
338:
285:
61:
1643:
Additionally, if you liked this review, or are looking for items to review, I have some at
1465:
684:
423:
has three times and it makes the prose quite repetitive and not as engaging as it could be.
304:
copyright issues by pulling from the original game, and should be mostly indistinguishable.
275:
These are my comment so far. My main concern is the article does not provide background on
1126:"Star Control creators Paul..." image captions which are fragments don't take a full stop.
1066:
1025:
940:
893:
852:
704:
158:, reads a little awkwardly since it is two separate descriptions tied together by a comma.
100:
916:
554:
as it implies a strong connection between citations. For instance, I do not imagine that
1767:
has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see
1107:"naturally limited in their social behaviors" what does this mean? Isn't every species?
912:
771:
I see no issue with the Chris Ullery piece for
Pikimal. Ullery is a journalist for the
183:
198:
they ally with the player against a different antagonist and their role is scaled back
809:
772:
753:
719:
647:
396:
1133:
1007:
376:
The first paragraph of the "Concept and creation" uses this sentence construction,
366:
is linked twice in the article when it should only be linked on its first instance.
1110:
Is that the best caterpillar image on all of Commons? I struggled to make it out.
1408:
Went ahead and added it. Thanks again for the review and hope that's everything.
147:
so apologies if this is obvious. Is there a reason for using a screenshot from a
1782:
1518:
1247:
1223:
Placeholder, coming here from the urgents list. Will review. Looks good so far.
744:
628:
627:
the article for promotion based on the prose. Best of luck with the nomination!
579:
507:
466:
428:
388:
334:
281:
212:
57:
355:
Their biological lineage is compared to solitary predators such as the praying
756:
384:
254:
Why is Hierarchy capitalized? Is it a proper noun in the context of this game?
170:
The Ur-Quan's military doctrine becomes a subject of intense internal conflict
543:
I would be careful about using "also" too much as it is mostly a filler word.
759:
700:
483:
Hey, thank you! And you're pretty prompt by my standards. Stay healthy as a
417:
I'd be careful with how many times Ur-Quan is repeated. For instance, the
407:
In the first paragraph of the "Reception" section, I am not sure the full
996:
740:
The Red Bull piece is written by Stuart Houghton, who is a journalist at
534:
mentions the Ur-Quan for their role in one of the best video game endings
409:
691:
Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Video_games/Archive_153#Reliable_source_check
394:
In the first paragraph of the "Reception" section, I would identify the
851:
link from the image description that may explain this is not working).
784:
747:
570:
148:
72:
1491:
first two games - worth saying the names of these games? Best Wishes,
913:
Here is a sequence from the 1992 DOS version played using an emulator
741:
363:
356:
230:
775:
565:
sentence in the first paragraph is missing a closing quotation mark.
39:
Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in
808:
Explanations for quality sound good, passing on the source review.
714:
Will do the spot checks for source-text integrity and copyright at
176:
or something similar? The current wording seems a little off to me.
163:
a traumatic past that lead them to fiercely seek their own security
1088:"Star Control series" I think it's worth adding "video game" here.
174:
The Ur-Quan's military doctrine leads to intense internal conflict
1129:
When using possessive apostrophe for an italicised word, use the
1061:
With the alterations, I think this is okay now. I'll give this a
716:
Knowledge (XXG) talk:Featured article candidates/Ur-Quan/archive1
251:, could you provide a more exact time frame as it is very vague.
140:
to the infobox image and the images used in the article itself.
1260:
Non-Anglophone refs should use the lang= parameter in CS1.
787:). Pikimal is defunct, but had full-time editorial review.
220:
they are praised for their surprising depth and humanity
65:
1120:
I don't think we need to link common words like human.
359:, who are naturally limited in their social behaviors.
1372:
lacked an enemy as compelling as the Ur-Quan Kohr-Ah.
1346:
Let me try rephrasing it to be a little less choppy:
249:
Much later, the Ur-Quan led a successful slave revolt
165:, from the lead means. Could you clarify this for me?
1594:
Any reason for the left aligned image? Best Wishes,
1145:
Date formats should be consistent in the references.
1142:"saw a National Geographic image" should be italics.
1024:, other than that, it seems like a solid article. --
1802:The above discussion is preserved as an archive.
371:Reiche describes their character creation process
761:It warrants a mention, which is the appropriate
41:Knowledge (XXG) talk:Featured article candidates
1010:have articles, yet are not linked in citations.
98:This article is about the main antagonist from
43:. No further edits should be made to this page.
1148:Refs 23 and 25 work are erroneously formatted.
1808:No further edits should be made to this page.
1781:template in place on the talk page until the
1204:Stay alert! Control the virus! Save lives!!!!
1159:Stay alert! Control the virus! Save lives!!!!
29:The following is an archived discussion of a
8:
269:the Ur-Quan join an alliance with the player
262:begins following the war from the first game
209:and has influenced other modern space games
18:Knowledge (XXG):Featured article candidates
1620:science fiction role-playing video game -
307:Ready for more feedback when you have it.
151:as opposed to one from the official games?
123:
1002:Several of the citation sources, such as
1298:(from the source, via google translate)
1104:"unique ships in " are these spaceships?
680:What makes 1MoreCastle high-quality RS?
623:Thank you for addressing everything. I
373:, I believe it should be in past tense.
353:I'm going to go back to this sentence:
1253:
1243:
551:
547:
537:
533:
377:
370:
354:
330:
268:
258:
248:
244:
219:
208:
204:
197:
196:I was somewhat confused by this part,
180:
169:
162:
155:
1101:"into an civil war over" a civil war.
7:
1246:should be presented as "fourth" per
546:I would be careful with things like
1152:That's all I have on a quick pass.
1123:"planet Earth imprisoned" likewise.
696:Sainsbury 2015 needs page numbers.
24:
172:, could it be phrased instead as
1091:Do we really need to link Earth?
329:I have a comment for this part,
245:Prior to the events of the games
243:For either of these two points,
203:I am uncertain about the use of
664:DeMaria 2018 needs page numbers
538:Laidlaw has praised the Ur-Quan
187:, developed by a different team
1:
267:I was confused by this part,
1392:I think that sounds fine :)
1197:Ok, cool, looks good to me.
673:is listed as situational at
362:approach it this way. Also,
1776:featured article candidates
31:featured article nomination
1825:
1468:once this review is over.
1244:4th greatest game villains
1117:"the 22nd Century" century
779:Bucks County Courier Times
1795:21:04, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
1750:13:57, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
1721:11:41, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
1699:09:17, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
1681:15:42, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
1658:13:01, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
1633:13:16, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
1616:13:16, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
1603:13:16, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
1590:13:16, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
1577:13:16, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
1556:13:16, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
1543:13:16, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
1530:13:16, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
1513:13:16, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
1500:13:16, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
1487:13:16, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
1437:21:52, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
1418:23:26, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
1404:01:01, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
1388:20:06, 10 July 2021 (UTC)
1335:18:31, 10 July 2021 (UTC)
1318:18:17, 10 July 2021 (UTC)
1275:17:56, 10 July 2021 (UTC)
1235:17:47, 10 July 2021 (UTC)
1209:12:35, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
1189:15:59, 10 July 2021 (UTC)
1164:14:33, 10 July 2021 (UTC)
1075:14:05, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
1050:14:01, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
1034:21:18, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
257:After reading this part,
189:, I believe it should be
1805:Please do not modify it.
986:Comments from ProtoDrake
968:22:53, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
949:21:07, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
929:14:38, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
902:20:48, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
883:19:17, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
861:22:46, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
832:19:17, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
818:02:52, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
804:19:24, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
728:05:25, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
699:Suggest adding links to
656:04:27, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
637:19:50, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
611:19:40, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
588:20:30, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
516:04:18, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
497:14:38, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
475:23:33, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
458:19:17, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
437:18:50, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
343:22:27, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
317:19:24, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
290:02:08, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
114:20:23, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
91:20:23, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
36:Please do not modify it.
1731:Check-in from nominator
847:Don't use fixed px size
822:Thanks for the review!
143:I am not familiar with
548:Echoing these rankings
1014:section flow better.
642:Source review - pass
420:Rock, Paper, Shotgun
240:could be wikilinked.
1646:my nominations list
1639:Additional comments
783:(both published by
646:Will conduct soon.
598:Hardcore Gaming 101
563:Hardcore Gaming 101
556:Hardcore Gaming 101
238:genetic engineering
191:which was developed
1290:(from the source)
1239:Only minor notes:
1207:
1162:
620:
619:
128:Resolved comments
119:Support by Aoba47
94:
1816:
1807:
1780:
1774:
1771:, and leave the
1709:
1695:
1669:
1654:
1629:
1612:
1599:
1586:
1573:
1552:
1539:
1526:
1509:
1496:
1483:
1345:
1342:Vaticidalprophet
1286:
1283:Vaticidalprophet
1219:Vaticidalprophet
1201:
1199:The Rambling Man
1177:
1174:The Rambling Man
1156:
1154:The Rambling Man
1138:
1132:
1083:Support from TRM
1060:
300:games are about.
192:
175:
124:
79:
48:The article was
38:
1824:
1823:
1819:
1818:
1817:
1815:
1814:
1813:
1812:
1803:
1778:
1772:
1733:
1703:
1693:
1663:
1652:
1649:. Best Wishes,
1627:
1624:. Best Wishes,
1610:
1597:
1584:
1571:
1550:
1537:
1524:
1521:? Best Wishes,
1507:
1494:
1481:
1458:
1339:
1280:
1221:
1171:
1136:
1130:
1085:
1054:
988:
844:
816:
726:
707:, as applicable
705:No Starch Press
654:
644:
621:
383:I do not think
369:For this part,
260:Star Control II
218:For this part,
190:
179:For this part,
173:
168:For this part,
129:
121:
101:Star Control II
76:
64:) 19 July 2021
34:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1822:
1820:
1811:
1810:
1798:
1797:
1785:goes through.
1757:
1756:
1732:
1729:
1728:
1727:
1726:
1725:
1724:
1723:
1684:
1683:
1641:
1640:
1636:
1635:
1618:
1605:
1592:
1579:
1564:
1563:
1559:
1558:
1545:
1532:
1517:Worth linking
1515:
1502:
1489:
1474:
1473:
1457:
1451:
1450:
1449:
1448:
1447:
1446:
1445:
1444:
1443:
1442:
1441:
1440:
1439:
1375:
1374:
1373:
1370:Star Control 3
1365:Star Control 3
1358:
1354:Star Control 3
1306:
1305:
1304:
1296:
1262:
1261:
1258:
1251:
1220:
1217:
1216:
1215:
1214:
1213:
1212:
1211:
1192:
1191:
1150:
1149:
1146:
1143:
1140:
1127:
1124:
1121:
1118:
1115:
1111:
1108:
1105:
1102:
1099:
1092:
1089:
1084:
1081:
1080:
1079:
1078:
1077:
1019:
1018:
1015:
1011:
1000:
987:
984:
983:
982:
981:
980:
979:
978:
977:
976:
975:
974:
973:
972:
971:
970:
952:
951:
932:
931:
905:
904:
886:
885:
864:
863:
848:
843:
840:
839:
838:
837:
836:
835:
834:
812:
792:
791:
790:
769:
766:
738:
722:
709:
708:
697:
694:
688:
681:
678:
668:
665:
662:
650:
643:
640:
618:
617:
616:
615:
614:
613:
576:
575:
566:
559:
544:
541:
529:
528:
527:
526:
525:
524:
523:
522:
521:
520:
519:
518:
500:
499:
478:
477:
445:
425:
424:
415:
405:
402:
392:
381:
374:
367:
350:
349:
348:
347:
346:
345:
320:
319:
305:
301:
273:
272:
265:
255:
252:
241:
234:
227:
223:
216:
207:in this part,
201:
194:
184:Star Control 3
177:
166:
159:
152:
141:
131:
130:
127:
122:
120:
117:
96:
95:
81:Nominator(s):
75:
70:
69:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1821:
1809:
1806:
1800:
1799:
1796:
1792:
1788:
1784:
1777:
1770:
1766:
1762:
1759:
1758:
1754:
1753:
1752:
1751:
1747:
1743:
1742:Shooterwalker
1739:
1730:
1722:
1718:
1714:
1713:Shooterwalker
1707:
1702:
1701:
1700:
1697:
1696:
1688:
1687:
1686:
1685:
1682:
1678:
1674:
1673:Shooterwalker
1667:
1662:
1661:
1660:
1659:
1656:
1655:
1648:
1647:
1638:
1637:
1634:
1631:
1630:
1623:
1619:
1617:
1614:
1613:
1606:
1604:
1601:
1600:
1593:
1591:
1588:
1587:
1580:
1578:
1575:
1574:
1566:
1565:
1561:
1560:
1557:
1554:
1553:
1546:
1544:
1541:
1540:
1533:
1531:
1528:
1527:
1520:
1516:
1514:
1511:
1510:
1503:
1501:
1498:
1497:
1490:
1488:
1485:
1484:
1476:
1475:
1471:
1470:
1469:
1467:
1463:
1456:
1452:
1438:
1435:
1434:
1430:
1429:
1424:
1421:
1420:
1419:
1415:
1411:
1410:Shooterwalker
1407:
1406:
1405:
1402:
1401:
1397:
1396:
1391:
1390:
1389:
1385:
1381:
1380:Shooterwalker
1376:
1371:
1366:
1362:
1359:
1355:
1351:
1348:
1347:
1343:
1338:
1337:
1336:
1333:
1332:
1328:
1327:
1321:
1320:
1319:
1315:
1311:
1310:Shooterwalker
1307:
1301:
1297:
1293:
1289:
1288:
1284:
1279:
1278:
1277:
1276:
1273:
1272:
1268:
1267:
1259:
1256:
1252:
1249:
1245:
1242:
1241:
1240:
1237:
1236:
1233:
1232:
1228:
1227:
1218:
1210:
1205:
1200:
1196:
1195:
1194:
1193:
1190:
1186:
1182:
1181:Shooterwalker
1175:
1170:
1169:
1168:
1167:
1166:
1165:
1160:
1155:
1147:
1144:
1141:
1135:
1128:
1125:
1122:
1119:
1116:
1112:
1109:
1106:
1103:
1100:
1097:
1093:
1090:
1087:
1086:
1082:
1076:
1072:
1068:
1064:
1058:
1057:Shooterwalker
1053:
1052:
1051:
1047:
1043:
1042:Shooterwalker
1038:
1037:
1036:
1035:
1031:
1027:
1023:
1022:Shooterwalker
1016:
1012:
1009:
1005:
1001:
998:
994:
993:
992:
985:
969:
965:
961:
960:Shooterwalker
956:
955:
954:
953:
950:
946:
942:
938:
937:
936:
935:
934:
933:
930:
926:
922:
921:Shooterwalker
918:
914:
909:
908:
907:
906:
903:
899:
895:
890:
889:
888:
887:
884:
880:
876:
875:Shooterwalker
872:
871:archived link
868:
867:
866:
865:
862:
858:
854:
849:
846:
845:
841:
833:
829:
825:
824:Shooterwalker
821:
820:
819:
815:
811:
807:
806:
805:
801:
797:
796:Shooterwalker
793:
789:
786:
782:
780:
776:
774:
773:Intelligencer
770:
767:
764:
760:
757:
755:
754:New Statesman
751:
749:
745:
743:
739:
735:
734:
732:
731:
730:
729:
725:
721:
717:
712:
706:
702:
698:
695:
692:
689:
686:
682:
679:
676:
672:
669:
666:
663:
660:
659:
658:
657:
653:
649:
641:
639:
638:
634:
630:
626:
612:
608:
604:
603:Shooterwalker
599:
594:
593:
592:
591:
590:
589:
585:
581:
573:
572:
567:
564:
560:
557:
553:
552:This mirrored
549:
545:
542:
539:
535:
531:
530:
517:
513:
509:
504:
503:
502:
501:
498:
494:
490:
489:Shooterwalker
486:
482:
481:
480:
479:
476:
472:
468:
463:
462:
461:
460:
459:
455:
451:
450:Shooterwalker
446:
443:
442:
441:
440:
439:
438:
434:
430:
422:
421:
416:
412:
411:
406:
403:
399:
398:
397:The A.V. Club
393:
390:
386:
382:
379:
375:
372:
368:
365:
360:
358:
352:
351:
344:
340:
336:
332:
328:
327:
324:
323:
322:
321:
318:
314:
310:
309:Shooterwalker
306:
302:
298:
294:
293:
292:
291:
287:
283:
278:
270:
266:
263:
261:
256:
253:
250:
246:
242:
239:
235:
232:
228:
224:
221:
217:
214:
210:
206:
202:
199:
195:
188:
186:
185:
178:
171:
167:
164:
160:
157:
153:
150:
146:
142:
139:
135:
134:
133:
132:
126:
125:
118:
116:
115:
111:
107:
106:Shooterwalker
103:
102:
93:
92:
88:
84:
83:Shooterwalker
78:
77:
74:
71:
68:
66:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
37:
32:
27:
26:
19:
1804:
1801:
1787:Gog the Mild
1761:Closing note
1760:
1737:
1734:
1706:Lee Vilenski
1694:Lee Vilenski
1691:
1666:Lee Vilenski
1653:Lee Vilenski
1650:
1644:
1642:
1628:Lee Vilenski
1625:
1622:WP:SEAOFBLUE
1611:Lee Vilenski
1608:
1598:Lee Vilenski
1595:
1585:Lee Vilenski
1582:
1572:Lee Vilenski
1569:
1551:Lee Vilenski
1548:
1538:Lee Vilenski
1535:
1525:Lee Vilenski
1522:
1508:Lee Vilenski
1505:
1495:Lee Vilenski
1492:
1482:Lee Vilenski
1479:
1459:
1455:Lee Vilenski
1432:
1427:
1422:
1399:
1394:
1369:
1364:
1360:
1353:
1349:
1330:
1325:
1299:
1291:
1270:
1265:
1263:
1238:
1230:
1225:
1222:
1151:
1113:utter -: -->
1095:
1062:
1020:
1008:Ars Technica
1004:The Escapist
995:You mention
989:
842:Image review
713:
710:
670:
645:
624:
622:
597:
577:
569:
562:
555:
485:WP:VOLUNTEER
426:
418:
408:
395:
277:Star Control
276:
274:
259:
182:
145:Star Control
144:
136:I would add
99:
97:
80:
54:Gog the Mild
49:
47:
35:
28:
1519:caterpillar
1453:Support by
1248:MOS:NUMERAL
1098:the sequel?
389:synthesizer
213:MOS:CURRENT
154:This part,
1067:ProtoDrake
1026:ProtoDrake
941:Nikkimaria
894:Nikkimaria
853:Nikkimaria
752:, and the
385:antagonist
1769:WP:FAC/ar
1765:candidate
1428:Vaticidal
1425:happily.
1395:Vaticidal
1326:Vaticidal
1266:Vaticidal
1226:Vaticidal
1139:template.
1114:complete?
763:WP:WEIGHT
701:CRC Press
378:which led
1763:: This
1357:Kohr-Ah.
1255:Kohr-Ah.
997:Red Bull
810:Hog Farm
777:and the
720:Hog Farm
671:Escapist
648:Hog Farm
410:GameSpot
297:WP:UNDUE
236:I think
193:instead.
138:ALT text
50:promoted
1738:support
1466:wikicup
1433:prophet
1423:Support
1400:prophet
1331:prophet
1271:prophet
1231:prophet
785:Gannett
748:Gizmodo
675:WP:VGRS
625:support
571:AllGame
326:prose:
149:fangame
73:Ur-Quan
1350:Before
1302:-: -->
1294:-: -->
742:Kotaku
685:WP:DUE
629:Aoba47
580:Aoba47
508:Aoba47
467:Aoba47
429:Aoba47
364:mantis
357:mantis
335:Aoba47
282:Aoba47
231:mantis
211:, per
205:modern
58:FACBot
1711:now.
1562:Prose
1361:After
16:<
1791:talk
1746:talk
1717:talk
1677:talk
1472:Lede
1462:lede
1414:talk
1384:talk
1314:talk
1185:talk
1071:talk
1065:. --
1063:Pass
1046:talk
1030:talk
1006:and
964:talk
945:talk
925:talk
898:talk
879:talk
857:talk
828:talk
814:Talk
800:talk
724:Talk
703:and
652:Talk
633:talk
607:talk
584:talk
568:The
561:The
550:and
536:and
512:talk
493:talk
471:talk
454:talk
433:talk
414:one.
339:talk
313:talk
286:talk
247:and
110:talk
87:talk
62:talk
56:via
1783:bot
1096:was
737:of.
401:is.
226:me.
181:In
52:by
1793:)
1779:}}
1773:{{
1748:)
1719:)
1679:)
1416:)
1386:)
1363::
1352::
1316:)
1187:)
1137:}}
1134:'s
1131:{{
1073:)
1048:)
1032:)
966:)
947:)
927:)
915:.
900:)
881:)
859:)
830:)
802:)
746:,
718:.
635:)
609:)
586:)
514:)
495:)
473:)
456:)
435:)
341:)
315:)
288:)
112:)
89:)
67:.
33:.
1789:(
1744:(
1715:(
1708::
1704:@
1675:(
1668::
1664:@
1412:(
1382:(
1344::
1340:@
1312:(
1285::
1281:@
1250:.
1206:)
1202:(
1183:(
1176::
1172:@
1161:)
1157:(
1069:(
1059::
1055:@
1044:(
1028:(
962:(
943:(
923:(
896:(
877:(
855:(
826:(
798:(
765:.
631:(
605:(
582:(
510:(
491:(
469:(
452:(
431:(
337:(
311:(
284:(
108:(
85:(
60:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.