77:
No offense, but this is a little inappropriate, as the incident is still progressing (which doesn't satisfy the stable criterion) but it is also not a fully complete article and there is a lot of work and copyediting needed before it becomes featured material. It's definitely on its way, but right
106:
and a leisurely glance at the article, I feel it also wouldn't meet 1a. In short, like Jared said, it's way too early to be even considering FA, let alone making a serious attempt at it. I'm sure that in the future, this will become one of our best articles (the number of references certainly
215:. I'd say speedy close, but I haven't previously voted in FA nominations and know very little about them. The article is very definitely unstable, the number of and its relationship with the accompanying subarticles is yet to be determined, and several sections are still in development. --
225:
Can someone perhaps just delete this whole nomination? This article is very well sourced, and may someday reach a stability point that would make it a suitable FA. Or perhaps not deleting this, but
356:
The events are still developing and the new sources are still unstable, but if this article has more pictures and it's nominated again in a week, I think it could possibly become featured.
243:
344:
This article is still developing with new reports and information. Until the news reports, and the police report has concluded, I don't believe that this should be an FA.
388:
372:
360:
348:
336:
319:
307:
278:
266:
286:
as per the above reasons. Too soon. Still a breaking news story. Edits constantly being made, making it unstable right now, etc. Jeeny 17:56, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
102:. Clearly does not meet the stable criterion. Further, because it is only 3 days after is is safe to assume that it is not comprehensive. From comments made in
425:
40:
30:
17:
252:
way too unstable, way too soon. Maybe in the future but there is way too much going on here right now to even consider giving it that little star.
239:
on the talk page instead... There are enough boxes there to begin with, and this nom is clearly not going anywhere. Any thoughts? Mahalo. --
407:
219:
207:
191:
179:
167:
155:
143:
131:
115:
94:
67:
139:
not stable due to the recent nature of the event. Also has a maintenance tag on it ("This article is becoming very long"). --
103:
327:
Sorry to say but I think we need to wait at least a month (4 weeks) or so until the media storm over this dies down.
57:
300:
127:
article, in fact it may even be feature quality, but it is absolutely not ready to be featured yet. --
369:
316:
332:
293:
140:
404:
233:
188:
176:
345:
380:- the article is not stable. Information is still getting in about the motive of the crime.
259:
187:
Maybe in a LONG time, when we actually know enough information to make this a great article
109:
64:
200:
87:
328:
164:
400:
123:, utterly fails stable criteria and has no chance of winning. I'm not saying it's a
152:
240:
382:
128:
275:
216:
263:
357:
274:
I don't think the article is stable enough yet to meet the requirements
151:. This article is changing extremely rapidly (1000's of edits per day).
315:. Too unstable right now, conflict over the name of the article, ect.
424:
Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in
39:
Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in
78:
now, I say we hold off, and you possibly withdraw this nomination.
368:- Far too volatile right now. Maybe when the dust settles. --
199:. Nicely referenced, but it's obviously unstable.
418:The above discussion is preserved as an archive.
175:obviously unstable. (Not to mention the rest...)
426:Knowledge (XXG) talk:Featured article candidates
163:. Clearly does not satisfy stability criterion.
41:Knowledge (XXG) talk:Featured article candidates
428:. No further edits should be made to this page.
43:. No further edits should be made to this page.
292:Way too soon. This is still far too unstable.
29:The following is an archived discussion of a
8:
63:Matches the criteria. Very well referenced.
18:Knowledge (XXG):Featured article candidates
107:suggests that). However, now is too soon.
7:
258:with no bias in the future, due to
24:
1:
398:Speedy closing per consensus.
104:this section of the talk page
31:featured article nomination
445:
408:00:33, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
389:19:59, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
373:19:52, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
361:19:37, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
349:19:09, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
337:18:35, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
320:18:22, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
308:18:01, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
279:17:31, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
267:17:28, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
244:15:46, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
220:16:51, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
208:17:14, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
192:16:20, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
180:15:37, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
168:15:28, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
156:15:15, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
144:14:50, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
132:14:14, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
116:13:56, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
95:13:19, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
68:13:14, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
262:(thanks to unstablity). -
421:Please do not modify it.
36:Please do not modify it.
58:Virginia Tech massacre
52:21:17, 23 April 2007.
335:
436:
423:
385:
331:
305:
298:
238:
232:
205:
90:
48:The article was
38:
444:
443:
439:
438:
437:
435:
434:
433:
432:
419:
383:
370:StuffOfInterest
317:Titanium Dragon
301:
294:
236:
230:
201:
93:
88:
84:
81:
61:
34:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
442:
440:
431:
430:
414:
413:
412:
411:
392:
391:
375:
363:
351:
339:
322:
310:
287:
281:
269:
253:
223:
222:
210:
194:
182:
170:
158:
146:
134:
118:
97:
85:
82:
79:
60:
55:
54:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
441:
429:
427:
422:
416:
415:
409:
406:
402:
399:
396:
395:
394:
393:
390:
387:
386:
379:
376:
374:
371:
367:
364:
362:
359:
355:
354:Slight Oppose
352:
350:
347:
343:
340:
338:
334:
330:
326:
323:
321:
318:
314:
311:
309:
306:
304:
299:
297:
291:
290:STRONG Oppose
288:
285:
282:
280:
277:
273:
270:
268:
265:
261:
257:
254:
251:
248:
247:
246:
245:
242:
235:
228:
221:
218:
214:
211:
209:
206:
204:
198:
195:
193:
190:
189:WiiAlbanyGirl
186:
183:
181:
178:
177:Pascal.Tesson
174:
171:
169:
166:
162:
159:
157:
154:
150:
147:
145:
142:
138:
135:
133:
130:
126:
122:
119:
117:
114:
113:
112:
105:
101:
98:
96:
92:
91:
76:
73:
72:
71:
69:
66:
59:
56:
53:
51:
44:
42:
37:
32:
27:
26:
19:
420:
417:
397:
381:
378:Speedy close
377:
365:
353:
346:Chickyfuzz14
341:
324:
313:Speedy close
312:
302:
295:
289:
284:Speedy close
283:
272:Speedy close
271:
256:Speedy close
255:
250:Speedy close
249:
229:placing the
226:
224:
212:
202:
197:Speedy close
196:
185:Speedy close
184:
173:Speedy close
172:
161:Speedy close
160:
149:Speedy close
148:
136:
124:
121:Speedy close
120:
110:
108:
99:
86:
74:
62:
50:not promoted
49:
47:
35:
28:
333:Talk to me!
111:Harryboyles
65:Dalejenkins
203:alphachimp
329:Booksworm
234:facfailed
165:CloudNine
401:Bishonen
75:Comment.
260:WP:SNOW
213:Comment
153:ike9898
141:W.marsh
384:Real96
366:Oppose
342:Oppose
325:Oppose
137:oppose
129:Golbez
100:Oppose
276:Zehly
241:Ali'i
217:Kizor
16:<
405:talk
303:pika
264:Halo
89:talk
358:D4S
296:Fun
227:not
125:bad
403:|
237:}}
231:{{
70:.
33:.
410:.
83:┘
80:└
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.