634:. I intended to review the Spanish-language sources, per the request at FAC talk, because two prior Supports suggest that this article was indeed FAC-worthy and ready for a source review. But, the prose is lacking (unlikely to be fixed by a copyedit), the lead is poorly organized and scattered, and there are sourcing problems in the few Spanish-language sources I checked (suggesting that should this article come back to FAC in the future with better writing and text that conforms to high-quality sourcing standards, then a thorough check of sourcing should be re-done ... I checked only a few).
383:
have worded that more clearly. I was just somewhat uncertain of this section was structured. For instance, there are three critics who dislike "No
Importa la Distancia" (i.e. Promis, Burr, and Tarradell), and it may be beneficial to organize these critiques together. I think your idea of separating the positive reviews into one paragraph and the negative into another makes sense to me. Please let me know if you have any further questions about this.
366:. I've addressed everything but the last part and I'll admit I was taken back a bit since this I never had this problem on my past FACs. One idea I have is the first paragraph would be for what critics liked about the album and the second paragraph what critics didn't like about it. This would be consistent with the opening lead since the overusage of ballads was criticized and would be useful on the second paragraph.
193:, how does the media files look now? I uploaded two samples, each one to represent the uptempo and slow tempo tracks of the album, respectively. I used the tracks that were not released as singles so I don't have to justify its inclusion on this article in addition to their usage on the article about the song. If two samples are not suitable and one of them has to go, which one would you recommend keeping?
382:
Thank you for your response. To be clear, I did not mean for the final comment to come across as rude or offensive. I greatly admire your work on
Knowledge, and you have done a great job with this article. With the last comment, I was more so asking about your approach for this section, and I should
346:
Great work with the article. I do not that many notes for the article, and once everything has been addressed, I will be more than happy to support this FAC for promotion. I hope that this review encourages other editors to look at this FAC as it has fallen rather down the list (at least at the time
335:. I do not find this rating to be particularly useful in the prose. It is already in the professional ratings box, and I think the prose is best left to actually discussing what is in the review. I'd remove the star ratings from the prose for all three instances.
310:
I have a question about the translations. Apologies if this is rather obvious. I have not worked with materials from other languages so I am not familiar with this. A majority of the
Spanish titles are translated, but there are a few instances, such as
656:-- For such issues to be raised in a nom that's been open six weeks is a concern, I suggest following the suggestions above and then perhaps trying PR (or seeing if Sandy is able to check over after improvements) before bringing back here. Cheers,
406:
Oh no no no, I greatly appreciate your feedback and I'm actually glad you brought that section up. This will help for future FACs. I should've said "surprised", instead of "taken back" and I do apologize if I came across as offended.
524:
Four weeks in and there is little sign of a consensus to promote forming. Unless this nomination attracts considerably more interest over the next two or three days I am afraid that it is liable to be archived.
631:
586:
110:. I worked extensively along with the editors mentioned and am tackle ready to tackle this for FA. Whatever issues the article presents, I am ready to address and any questions that might need to be answered.
140:
and is still actively editing. And yet, two other editors are listed as co-noms. Was Max24 consulted prior to this nomination (see FAC instructions) and is Max24 in agreement that the article is FAC ready?
617:
338:
What is the structure for the "Critical reception" section? Right now, it reads more like two paragraphs with reviews somewhat randomly listed without any real rhyme or reason. See
613:
99:
269:
40:
609:
605:
563:
675:
30:
17:
686:
324:
In the "Critical reception" section, there are three instances in which the star rating is included in the prose. This is an example,
705:
665:
648:
621:
598:
553:
534:
501:
481:
457:
432:
416:
392:
375:
356:
251:
237:
216:
202:
182:
155:
119:
90:
303:
since this is brought up in the above sentence and in the lead, and would be a more useful descriptor than the more generic
137:
130:
472:, I was working on the critical reception on a sandbox of mine and just finished revamping it. How does it look now?
644:
530:
477:
412:
371:
233:
198:
151:
115:
86:
558:
I've made a few tweaks myself; feel free to revert anything you disagree with. I only have two comments:
207:
Can you elaborate on the FURs, particularly the purpose of use item? That would help justify having two.
313:
247:
212:
178:
339:
701:
661:
635:
594:
549:
526:
473:
443:
408:
367:
229:
194:
142:
126:
111:
82:
679:
574:
497:
453:
428:
388:
352:
61:
243:
223:
208:
190:
174:
678:
has been archived, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see
72:
697:
657:
567:
53:
590:
545:
318:
693:
493:
467:
449:
424:
401:
384:
363:
348:
304:
300:
296:
292:
282:
103:
57:
286:
448:
Apologies for the ping. I just wanted to check in on the progress for this.
423:
I just wanted to make sure. Let me know when you have revised that section.
321:", that do not have this. Shouldn't it be consistent for each Spanish title?
604:
Thank you so much for your support and making the tweaks. I changed "a
342:
if you would like a good resource on how to write a reception section.
281:
is a Latin album composed of 14 songs, consisting mainly of "red-hot"
347:
of me typing this out). I hope you are doing well and staying safe!
39:
Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in
492:
this FAC for promotion based on the prose. Best of luck with it!
173:
File:DracoRosa3.jpg: source links don't appear to be working.
228:
How do the FURs look now on the "purpose of use" section?
333:
Lechner gave the album three-and-a-half out of four stars
65:
106:. This is my first non Luis Miguel album article in a
577:, titles of works should be italicised in citations
713:The above discussion is preserved as an archive.
170:Might the article benefit from a non-free sample?
276:I have a question about the following sentence:
43:. No further edits should be made to this page.
719:No further edits should be made to this page.
692:template in place on the talk page until the
29:The following is an archived discussion of a
8:
268:For transparency, I had participated in the
41:Knowledge talk:Featured article candidates
272:for this article. My comments are below:
488:Thank you for addressing everything. I
291:This specifically defines the genre as
325:
277:
138:shown as a top editor of this article
18:Knowledge:Featured article candidates
7:
299:. Shouldn't it be the more specific
585:. BTW, I'd appreciate any comments
129:, for the avoidance of doubt about
362:Thanks for the comments as always
24:
295:, but the infobox only includes
1:
706:12:09, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
666:12:09, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
649:02:04, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
628:Oppose and suggest withdrawal
622:11:34, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
599:04:50, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
554:06:49, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
156:23:01, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
535:12:16, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
502:23:49, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
482:01:09, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
458:21:46, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
433:14:20, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
417:07:19, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
393:03:10, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
376:00:55, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
357:02:45, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
252:03:19, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
238:01:31, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
217:03:05, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
203:16:01, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
183:23:22, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
120:13:55, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
91:13:55, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
687:featured article candidates
285:numbers and "melodramatic"
31:featured article nomination
736:
716:Please do not modify it.
36:Please do not modify it.
544:Will take a look soon.
167:Don't use fixed px size
562:"asked him to write a
131:top contributors stats
242:Yes, that's helpful.
125:Noting that Erick is
520:Coordinator comment
264:Support from Aoba47
98:Co-nomination with
64:) 30 November 2021
632:review is on talk
328:Los Angeles Times
127:User:Magiciandude
94:
727:
718:
691:
685:
682:, and leave the
641:
575:MOS:CONFORMTITLE
471:
447:
405:
332:
270:last peer review
227:
148:
79:
48:The article was
38:
735:
734:
730:
729:
728:
726:
725:
724:
723:
714:
689:
683:
639:
542:
522:
465:
441:
399:
330:
266:
221:
164:
146:
76:
34:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
733:
731:
722:
721:
709:
708:
696:goes through.
625:
624:
579:
578:
571:
541:
538:
521:
518:
517:
516:
515:
514:
513:
512:
511:
510:
509:
508:
507:
506:
505:
504:
461:
460:
436:
435:
397:
396:
395:
344:
343:
336:
322:
308:
265:
262:
261:
260:
259:
258:
257:
256:
255:
254:
186:
185:
171:
168:
163:
160:
159:
158:
136:User:Max24 is
134:
96:
95:
81:Nominator(s):
75:
73:Vuelve (album)
70:
69:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
732:
720:
717:
711:
710:
707:
703:
699:
695:
688:
681:
677:
673:
670:
669:
668:
667:
663:
659:
655:
651:
650:
646:
642:
638:
633:
629:
623:
619:
615:
614:آرمین هویدایی
611:
607:
603:
602:
601:
600:
596:
592:
588:
584:
576:
572:
569:
565:
561:
560:
559:
556:
555:
551:
547:
539:
537:
536:
532:
528:
519:
503:
499:
495:
491:
487:
486:
485:
484:
483:
479:
475:
469:
463:
462:
459:
455:
451:
445:
440:
439:
438:
437:
434:
430:
426:
422:
421:
420:
419:
418:
414:
410:
403:
398:
394:
390:
386:
381:
380:
379:
378:
377:
373:
369:
365:
361:
360:
359:
358:
354:
350:
341:
337:
334:
329:
323:
320:
316:
315:
314:A Medio Vivir
309:
306:
302:
298:
294:
290:
288:
284:
280:
275:
274:
273:
271:
263:
253:
249:
245:
241:
240:
239:
235:
231:
225:
220:
219:
218:
214:
210:
206:
205:
204:
200:
196:
192:
188:
187:
184:
180:
176:
172:
169:
166:
165:
161:
157:
153:
149:
145:
139:
135:
132:
128:
124:
123:
122:
121:
117:
113:
109:
105:
101:
100:آرمین هویدایی
93:
92:
88:
84:
78:
77:
74:
71:
68:
66:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
37:
32:
27:
26:
19:
715:
712:
672:Closing note
671:
653:
652:
636:
627:
626:
582:
581:So, yeah, I
580:
557:
543:
527:Gog the Mild
523:
489:
444:Magiciandude
345:
340:WP:RECEPTION
327:
319:Marcia Baila
312:
278:
267:
162:Image review
143:
107:
97:
80:
49:
47:
35:
28:
606:composition
564:composition
307:identifier?
301:Latin dance
293:Latin dance
287:pop ballads
283:Latin dance
654:Coord note
464:Hey there
244:Nikkimaria
224:Nikkimaria
209:Nikkimaria
191:Nikkimaria
175:Nikkimaria
680:WP:FAC/ar
676:candidate
608:" to "an
108:long time
698:Ian Rose
674:: This
658:Ian Rose
54:Ian Rose
50:archived
640:Georgia
591:Pamzeis
583:support
566:for" —
546:Pamzeis
540:Pamzeis
490:support
147:Georgia
610:anthem
568:WP:EGG
494:Aoba47
468:Aoba47
450:Aoba47
425:Aoba47
402:Aoba47
385:Aoba47
364:Aoba47
349:Aoba47
279:Vuelve
133:check.
104:Tomica
58:FACBot
637:Sandy
630:: my
474:Erick
409:Erick
368:Erick
317:and "
305:Latin
297:Latin
230:Erick
195:Erick
144:Sandy
112:Erick
83:Erick
16:<
702:talk
662:talk
645:Talk
618:talk
595:talk
587:here
573:Per
550:talk
531:talk
498:talk
478:talk
454:talk
429:talk
413:talk
389:talk
372:talk
353:talk
326:The
248:talk
234:talk
213:talk
199:talk
179:talk
152:Talk
116:talk
102:and
87:talk
62:talk
56:via
694:bot
647:)
612:".
189:Hi
154:)
52:by
704:)
690:}}
684:{{
664:)
620:)
597:)
589:.
552:)
533:)
500:)
480:)
456:)
431:)
415:)
391:)
374:)
355:)
250:)
236:)
215:)
201:)
181:)
118:)
89:)
67:.
33:.
700:(
660:(
643:(
616:(
593:(
570:?
548:(
529:(
496:(
476:(
470::
466:@
452:(
446::
442:@
427:(
411:(
404::
400:@
387:(
370:(
351:(
331:'
289:.
246:(
232:(
226::
222:@
211:(
197:(
177:(
150:(
114:(
85:(
60:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.