73:
revolution at the very beginning and changed from being anti-Manchu, pro-West to being anti-Western imperialism after the revolution) and made a bunch of semi-conflicting statements to please the factions he was trying to unite. The
Lincoln quote does not adequately explain his position on democracy (he did not believe in mass elections by an uneducated populace and followed the Chinese line of supporting democracy only as a means to strengthen the state). There also needs to be mention of Sun support of nationalism (very very important here, and what he meant by minzu zhuyi needs to be explained too) and communism and socialism (which he tied with Confucian harmony). Lincoln and Hamilton should not be mentioned.
202:
Before coming here, this should have been done (at a minimum) so that we know that the problems you raise with the article are agreed on, by consensus, to be major problems. As I look through your list of issues, a number of them appear to be POV issues where there may be disagreements with other of the article's editors. This is why the issues should have been raised on the article's talk page, so the rest of us would know for certain that these problems are indeed major problems and not POV issues. Until this is done, I can not be certain that this article is not in the FARC process for political reasons. I would be interested in the views on this from other editors who frequent this FARC page.--
612:
Henry George). Quoting Sun Yat-sen from memory (sorry, my reading materials are in another city): "Minshengzhuyi is socialism, it is communism". Henry George's land value taxation doesn't sound capitalist to me. The situation was that Sun was trying to please both the CCP and KMT right wing at the same time: he pleased the CCP by promoting socialism/communism and anti-imperialist, but pleased the right KMT by denouncing
Marxism (he was for "harmony" of the classes rather than class struggle) and alluding to Confucian harmony. This is how he can say a revolution had no place in China, yet also promote communism.
173:. All of the issues you raise are serious and the article should either be edited to reflect these concerns or the issues should be debated on the article's talk page. However, the simple fact is that this article was promoted to FA status just over a month and a half ago. The rules on this FARC page state that newly promoted articles should not be nominated for removal. In addition, I prefer to see people raise concerns with a FA article on that article's talk page and by attempting to edit the article before it is brought here. --
183:
unexpectantly promoted it. I did attempt to edit the article. Given the task at hand, it will take some time. This article should not stay featured if it does not meet the guidelines - that would be misleading our readers. Given the changes needed, we can always renominate the article once it is rewritten. I don't see how it is logical oppose removing FA status for the period before this article is improved. There are clearly defined guidelines for featured articles. The procedure is irrelevant.--
152:"True to his brother's earlier concern, Sun was later baptised in Hong Kong by Hickley, an American missionary of the Congressional Church of the United States. Sun believed that the salvation mission of the Christian church was similar to that of a revolution. His conversion to Christianity was related to his revolutionary ideals and push for advancement. His baptismal name, Rixin, means getting rid of the old to welcome the new, and accepting new thoughts and ideas."
460:"In 1924, in order to hasten the conquest of China, he began a policy of active cooperation with the Chinese Communists" is definitely an adequate mention of Sun's cooperation and relationship with the communists. After all, Sun himself is a pro-capitalist instead of a communist and he died shortly after establishing relationship between KMT and communists. Therefore, I strongly believe more mentioning of the fact will create excess details towards the matter.
55:
response from the nominators was that they did not know enough about the subject to act on these objections) and the support votes were mostly unexplained and unsubstantiated - a result of active campaigning by the nominators. I have fucked the lead section and the sections on the early part of Sun's life over my objections, but this article should not stay featured without a rewrite in the meantime, and should still need a renomination if it is rewritten.
608:, did not solve the problems states. You are calling these "early influences" (by assumption before 1911), but you cite articles dated 1917 and 1921 (near the end of Sun's life). There is still no mention of Chinese ideology or Japanese pan-Asianism. There is no mention of the anti-Marxist, anti-imperialist, but pro-communist thought he was spreading towards the end.
146:"From absolutely no knowledge of English, Sun Yat Sen picked up the language so quickly that he was awarded a prize for outstanding achievement in English by King David Kalakaua. Sun Yat Sen then enrolled in Oahu College for further studies but he was soon sent home to China as his brother, Sun Mei was afraid that Sun Yat Sen would embrace Christianity."
647:
country. I believe (again, I am without my reading materials), Huang favored a revolution around
Shanghai and Sun favored one in his native Guangdong. Huang Xing's significance is beyond that. When Sun was president, Huang remained his right hand man as premier and practically ran the government in Sun's name.
684:
Contributors to this page actually said I should add the content related to the overseas
Chinese, saying they are from HK. Are the contributors to this page more concerned over whether this page touches only on facts they happen to know from their geographical perspective, or the comprehensiveness of
611:
Your statement "Sun himself is a pro-capitalist instead of a communist and he died shortly after establishing relationship between KMT and communists." borders on absurdity. Sun always considered himself a socialist. The two guys he borrowed his social program from were socialists (Marice
William and
275:
The task at hand is too immense for me to cover everything in the near furture. If this is removed, I do intend to improve it when I have time to get it back up to shape. Deryck Chan said he lacked the information to proceed further, but I said I did and could offer it to him - and the discussion was
265:
also said, "I think the article *nearly* makes the threshhold for fa status." If it nearly made the cut in his opinion then, and another user questioned the validity of these issues, then I am unconvinced that this article should be removed. This brings me back to my main point: Raise these issues on
93:
there is a lack of coverage of Sun's political leanings. this article does not give a clear picture of Sun's political associations. there is no mention of the formation of the KMT in 1912, the abandonment of the KMT after 1913, the formation of the
Chinese Revolutionary Party, and later re-formation
680:
As an overseas
Chinese myself, I brought up objection over the article as an FA when it was nominated over its scant (or rather non-existant) mention on the role of the overseas Chinese in his personal efforts made in gathering support from them. I managed to add into the article from my Singaporean
646:
The new addition of "at that moment Sun was still on exile and Huang Xing was in charge of the revolution" after
Wuchang is misleading. The mutiny was instigated by New Army soldiers infiltrated by the Tongmenghui, not Sun Yat-sen, Huang Xing, et al who never planned a revolution in that part of the
428:
I don't think one can identify a passage as violation of copyright just because of those SIMPLE statements were also put here. According to
Knowledge's language guide, wording must be concise. I don't see an alternative way that those details can be mentioned with concise wording without editing the
182:
The rules on this FARC page state that newly promoted articles should not be nominated for removal because "such complaints should have been brought up during the candidate period". However, in this case, the complaints were brought up during the removal period and were under discussion when Raul654
72:
Sun's political theory must be traced from the beginning and deserved greater coverage. The section "Western ideology and Sun Yat-sen" assumes that Sun's thinking was the same from the start and remained unwavering. In fact, Sun revised his ideas many times (he was leaning towards reform rather than
654:
biased right now by withholding information on how politically isolated Sun was at various times and how to had to engage in power struggles within these revolutionary societies. Saying these organizations merely "helped him in his way of revolution" is pro-Chinese bias, claiming Sun was the center
463:
Jiang's opinion "the legacy section makes no mention of revisionist historians who think Sun had little to do with the success of the revolution." is out of the question. The legacy section is suppose to talk about how Sun's life influence others after his death instead of the disputes and opinions
661:
Even after these objections, we still have the structural issue of overseas
Chinese, the need to mention secret societies and triads, Sun's role in the various uprisings, Sun's major foreign contacts, Sun's kidnapping by the Chinese Legion, Sun's courting the reformists, Sun's activities following
201:
The procedure is not irrelevant--it is clearly stated on the FARC page. I also repeat my strong opposition to someone asking for a FA to be removed without FIRST raising these issues on the article's talk page. You have not raised any issue about the article on its talk page in a number of months.
695:
The scant attention paid to copyright issues is once again brought up, and once again dismissed in a seemingly lax manner. Even a single word can be a copyright issue (some words are copyrighted), so please dont try to beat the system asking just how long or short lifted material should be before
306:
and among those who voted "support". The NPOV issue here is over coverage, not tone or wording. Different versions of history blot out different episodes. The debate over whether my objections are valid belongs on this page. This is what the two week holding period is for! Alternatively, I can be
298:
first and not induce uncalled for procedural criteria for listing. They are not in the rules and nowhere does it say that we must first post on the talk page before listing a farc. I believe this purpose is served by having {{farc}} added to the article talk page. This was previously accomplished
290:
Whether to list this article as a farc is based on procedure, but whether to keep or remove this article is based on guideline. These are two separate issues. You can argue here on this page's talk page that we should get rid of this listing and come back in a month, but whether the procedure was
109:
it does not make sense to group all discussion of Sun Yat-sen thought (which is insufficiently explained) under "Sun Yat-sen and Western ideology" (what about SYS and Chinese ideology? and Japanese pan-Asianism?). His ideology evolved over time. It was not simply developed in full before 1911. It
62:
There is absolutely no mention of Sun's ties to the secret societies and Triads, which he established to shit .*Sun's role in the 1895 uprising, or for that matter, his role in all eleven uprising attributed to him (only on of which - in near Indochina - Sun directly participated in) must be more
517:
to reproduce that information in exactly that presentation, and considering the fact that such correspondences appear multiple times in the article, it seems clear that if the source is in fact protected then the article contains copyright issues (and plagiarism issues) that need to be addressed
105:
it does not make sense to exlude all mentions of overseas chinese contacts outside the legacy section. The overseas Chinese section does not belong under "legacy". It belongs in an earlier section that should include Sun's many contacts with some very diverse groups (westerners, Japanese, secret
54:
This article poorly written, biased towards the KMT/CCP (Chinese) viewpoint that elevates Sun to a cultlike figure, and contains some very disturbing gaps in the historical narrative. I am suprised that this was featured in the first place, given that my objections were barely responded to (the
615:
You say, "The legacy section is suppose to talk about how Sun's life influence others after his death instead of the disputes and opinions about him after he was dead. " I'm afraid part of the definition of legacy has to do with "disputes and opinions about him after he was dead" At least this
341:
This is simply not true. I made sure that every person who voted "support" in the original nomination was made aware of this farc. Out of the original supporters, three explicitly came here to support the removal (Borisblue, Huaiwei, Piotrus) and two others (Instantnood, Flcelloguy) expressed
76:
tied in with the earlier part of the Sun's revolution is his inability to be accepted by the reformists and gentry (because he lacked a classical education). His being rebuffed by Li Hongzhang and Kang Youwei (who not only refused to follow Sun but pulled Liang Qichao away from him) should be
883:(c) "factually accurate" includes the supporting of facts with specific evidence and external citations (see Knowledge:Verifiability); these include a "References" section where the references are set out, enhanced by the appropriate use of inline citations (see Knowledge:Cite sources)
410:. More than a half of the "copyright violations" concerns raised by Jiang were simply unreasonable because those sentences that Jiang stated as "violating" were so short and simple statements that everyone will write the same sentence when he/she is addressing about the same fact:
719:. I think that enough useful info has been raised above to allow willing editors to fix it. If this is done, let me know and I'll change my vote to support. However, since apparently the current article is not comprehensive, and possibly POVed, it must be improved or removed. --
885:
There are no inline citations. The printed matter listed under "references" spends entire chapters on some of my points but there is still no mention here. I highly doubt they were consulted at all. As I pointed out earlier, some of the historical claims are shaky.
118:
this article seems to be influenced by the elevation of Sun's stature after his death and fails to explain Sun's political isolation, especially after the Second Revolution and before the coming of Comitern (this isolation allowed him to be kicked out of Guangzhou
658:"Sun's later action didn't reflect much about his Confucian belief" Again, this is outright wrong. I can provide you with the quotations, but Sun clearly associated democratic participation and equal land holdings with Confucian harmony.
321:
However, majority concensus was drawn that the above concerns raised by Jiang (I think copyright violation is the only exception) were not so important that can let the article fail featured article status. Please observe this fact.
122:
the explanation of Sun's ideology is pro-Western, pro-KMT. we lack a mention of Sun's pan-Asian, pro-communist, and later anti-western imperialism leaninings. The influence of Confucianism, especially datong, is unappropriately left
448:
In addition, on the "Western Ideology" section, the problems that you've arise can be solved by a simple means: Retitling (which I've already done so). After all, the title was inappropriate at its original state as it's Sun's
616:
article is doing just that, by explaining how well he is admired. But to be NPOV, the opposite side of the story must be given. This is how every major biography is being done. Some legacy sections of other featured articles:
346:(expect you) have objected to my reasons for removal (though we have one more "keep" vote on procedural grounds) and you have yet to respond to my rebuttals to your shaky historical claims. I am still waiting for a response.--
681:
perspective, but I mentioned it still lacks crucial mention on other localities, and it actually appears too biased towards Singapore with the lopsided availability of content. These has not been addressed even up till now.
110:
changed dramatically after then. Even the cited documents show that the chronology does not match. A problem is seen where the last sentence of "From exile to Wuchang Uprising" is redundant with the preceding section.
156:
I understand that not every details needs to be listed for this to be featured, but the I hope this list is long enough (with some items general enough) to show that this biography of Sun Yat-sen has some very major
486:
Sun was not the initial leader of Tongmenghui. The article will possibly become biased towards Sun's good side if he was mentioned as the leader of these small organizations (although they helped him in his way of
650:"The article will possibly become biased towards Sun's good side if he was mentioned as the leader of these small organizations (although they helped him in his way of revolution)." Again, a ridiculous notion. We
291:
followed is not in itself a reason to "keep". If I removed this listing now, posted all of this on the talk page, and came back a month later, are you going to vote "keep" again because the farc "recently failed"?
94:
of the KMT. for someone who was the nominal head of the party (also not mentioned), I find this disturbing. Sun was also the leader of the Tongmenghui and a bunch of stuff. Knowledge just says "he joined".
688:
I was similarly concerned over the lack of mention over that London kidnapping incident, an incident so major it deserved its own section in a quick run-down of his history in this source, for example:
881:
I have listed major facts and details this article is listing. My list was not simply one or two items long that could be satisfied within a couple hours (or I would have changed the article by now.)
483:
In most time when Huang Xing was active Sun was in exile. Sun himself has little direct connections with Huang Xing and therefore one sentence or remark (as I've recently added) is enough to mention.
393:, unless these problems are addressed in a fairly brisk timeframe. I don't see why we should compound failures of the initial process by preventing our failure-addressing apparatus from working.
422:"...he studied English at the Anglican Diocesan Home & Orphanage (later renamed Diocesan Boys' School in 1913). In April 1884, Sun, 17, was transferred to the Central School of Hong Kong."
149:"...he studied English at the Anglican Diocesan Home & Orphanage (later renamed Diocesan Boys' School in 1913). In April 1884, Sun, 17, was transferred to the Central School of Hong Kong."
828:. As those phrases are not long under suspectible copyright violation. Feature article is just a good article, never a prefect one. It is good that Jiang found some rooms to improve it.
490:"The influence of Confucianism, especially datong, is unappropriately left out." -- this concern seems too trivial. Sun's later action didn't reflect much about his Confucian belief. --
87:
Sun's activities following the 1913 failed uprising are inadequately explained. Perhaps this is blotted out of Chinese histiographies because Sun was politically isolated at this time
764:
Have the copied sentences been removed now? It's unacceptable for any article, let alone a featured article, to have sentences or phrases copied directly from another source.
90:
the coverage of Sun and his revolutionary base in Canton is shaky. Knowledge says he returned in 1917. It does not show that he was expelled and restored twice from 1918-1923.
295:
212:
46:
17:
890:
As stated above, the treatment of Sun's ideology and the exclusion of an entire decade of his life is not neutral, and in the very least, not comprehensive. --
692:. He wrote a book on it, and there is even a play writtern about it. If this page can miss out on something like this, I wonder what else is possibly missing.
303:
294:
If we are required to post these things on the talk page before we come here, then that should be written into the page guidelines. Please propose it at
768:
The length of a copied text should not matter; anything copied directly can be seen as plagarism and should be removed immediately. Thanks.
838:
888:(d) "neutral" means that an article is uncontroversial in its neutrality and factual accuracy (see Knowledge:Neutral point of view)
97:
the legacy section makes no mention of revisionist historians who think Sun had little to do with the success of the revolution.
879:(b) "comprehensive" means that an article covers the topic in its entirety, and does not neglect any major facts or details.
69:
Sun's kidnapping by the Chinese Legion in london (which led the English media to propel him into fame) needs to be mentioned
895:
832:
816:
794:
756:
740:
723:
707:
669:
564:
548:
525:
504:
478:
443:
425:"Sun was later baptised in Hong Kong by Hickley, an American missionary of the Congressional Church of the United States."
400:
385:
370:
353:
336:
314:
283:
270:
206:
190:
177:
164:
584:
630:
have ranked Lincoln as among the greatest presidents in U.S. history. Among contemporary admirers, Lincoln is usually
696:
they violate copyright rules. It shows too little attention paid to copyright and effort made to avoid its violation.
655:
of the revolution. What historical grounding do you base this on? And the Chinese Revolutionary Party was important.
242:
221:
522:
397:
592:"Sun Dacheng, the father of Sun Yat-sen, farmed during the day and worked as a watchman during the night." and
519:
394:
637:
811:
753:
543:
499:
473:
438:
331:
252:
231:
781:
774:
382:
267:
203:
174:
602:"Sun had another brother, De you, two older sisters Jinxing and Miaoxi, and a younger sister Qiuqi."
587:
for much simpler sentences (and over my objections too). Of course you can rewrite these sentences:
737:
790:
786:
690:
131:
589:"Sun Yat Sen's father, Sun Dacheng, was a farmer by day and a midnight watch beater by night."
583:
The sentences copied are not simple. Past precedent has resulted in articles being deleted at
413:"Sun Yat Sen's father, Sun Dacheng, was a farmer by day and a midnight watch beater by night."
137:"Sun Yat Sen's father, Sun Dacheng, was a farmer by day and a midnight watch beater by night."
803:
750:
535:
491:
465:
430:
323:
247:
237:
226:
216:
699:
Given the above, I feel compelled to change my previous vote (itself a reluctant one) to a
599:"Sun also had elder sister Jinxing, brother Deyou, sister Miaoxi and younger sister Qiuqi."
419:"Sun also had elder sister Jinxing, brother Deyou, sister Miaoxi and younger sister Qiuqi."
143:"Sun also had elder sister Jinxing, brother Deyou, sister Miaoxi and younger sister Qiuqi."
769:
666:
625:
561:
379:
350:
311:
280:
187:
161:
513:
Given that the sentences are in fact long and complex and that any given author would be
733:
597:"Sun's oldest brother was Sun Mei (Dezhang), who was twelve years older than him." and
367:
617:
36:
50:). Those reviewing this candidacy may wish to also refer to the original nomination.
829:
720:
704:
66:
Sun's major foreign contacts (eg Dr Cantlie) and connections should be mentioned.
27:
891:
837:
Featured articles must not merely be "good". They must be wikipedia's "best".
749:
ment. Having featured status doesn't mean no further improvement is needed. —
663:
558:
557:
Anything longer than a phrase is long. It is possible to rearrange clauses. --
347:
308:
277:
262:
258:
184:
158:
81:
766:
This is plagarism — the stealing of another person's intellectual property.
732:. Good article, but with serious problems that should have been addressed.
307:
disruptive and tag this as a copyvio but I dont think I should do that. --
662:
the 1913 failed uprising, and Sun and his revolutionary base in Canton--
261:
did not edit the article to address these issues. In the original FARC,
800:
NOTE: All phrases with suspectible copyright violation were re-written
132:
http://www.wanqingyuan.com.sg/english/onceupon/onceupon.html
215:, the importance of the issues raised above was debated by
594:"His eldest brother, Sun Mei (Dezhang), was born in 1854."
416:"His eldest brother, Sun Mei (Dezhang), was born in 1854."
140:"His eldest brother, Sun Mei (Dezhang), was born in 1854."
605:
342:
disatisfaction with the current state of the article.
638:"Her achievements, however, were greatly magnified
518:immediately if the article is to remain featured.
296:Knowledge talk:Featured article removal candidates
276:ended there was a promotion of this article. --
634:as a figure who personifies classical values."
378:- Jiang has shown there to be many problems.
211:One more thing: During the article's original
44:Note: This article was promoted on August 15 (
18:Knowledge:Featured article removal candidates
8:
304:Knowledge:China-related topics notice board
534:Do you mean a 10-word sentence is long?
302:I will go and solicit more optinions at
299:when {{fac}} was added to the talk page.
58:Gaps in history that need to be filled:
622:rank Polk as a near-great President..."
721:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus
7:
106:societies, bandits, outlaws, etc).
24:
685:the subject matter at hand here?
464:about him after he was dead. --
429:sentences into these forms. --
1:
896:19:55, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
833:16:26, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
817:02:38, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
354:03:28, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
337:02:41, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
236:, who nominated the article.
795:22:52, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
757:13:20, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
741:08:53, 2 November 2005 (UTC)
724:15:20, 1 November 2005 (UTC)
708:07:55, 1 November 2005 (UTC)
670:08:57, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
585:wikipedia:copyright problems
565:08:59, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
549:08:21, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
526:08:12, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
505:07:53, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
479:07:36, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
444:07:25, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
401:06:30, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
386:15:30, 30 October 2005 (UTC)
371:14:52, 30 October 2005 (UTC)
315:03:12, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
284:03:12, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
271:18:03, 30 October 2005 (UTC)
207:17:53, 30 October 2005 (UTC)
191:14:24, 30 October 2005 (UTC)
178:14:03, 30 October 2005 (UTC)
165:13:54, 30 October 2005 (UTC)
130:: text copied verbatim from
37:no longer a featured article
453:by the ideology instead of
266:the article's talk page. --
80:why is there no mention of
914:
101:Structural concerns:
47:archive of nomination
128:Copyright violations
861:". This article is
841:must be "should be
626:"Repeated polls of
114:Neutrality issues:
851:factually accurate
839:A featured article
520:Christopher Parham
515:extremely unlikely
457:with the ideology.
395:Christopher Parham
784:
63:clearly explained
905:
814:
809:
806:
778:
773:
745:Definitely need
546:
541:
538:
502:
497:
494:
476:
471:
468:
441:
436:
433:
334:
329:
326:
255:
250:
245:
240:
234:
229:
224:
219:
913:
912:
908:
907:
906:
904:
903:
902:
865:comprehensive,
812:
807:
804:
793:
776:
640:after her death
544:
539:
536:
500:
495:
492:
474:
469:
466:
439:
434:
431:
332:
327:
324:
257:also asked why
253:
248:
243:
238:
232:
227:
222:
217:
157:shortcomings.--
31:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
911:
909:
901:
900:
899:
898:
873:accurate, and
863:absolutely not
819:
797:
789:
759:
743:
726:
710:
698:
697:
694:
693:
687:
686:
683:
682:
677:
676:
675:
674:
673:
672:
659:
656:
648:
644:
613:
609:
603:
576:
575:
574:
573:
572:
571:
570:
569:
568:
567:
552:
551:
529:
528:
508:
507:
488:
484:
481:
461:
458:
446:
426:
423:
420:
417:
414:
404:
403:
388:
373:
361:
360:
359:
358:
357:
356:
319:
318:
317:
300:
292:
288:
287:
286:
196:
195:
194:
193:
154:
153:
150:
147:
144:
141:
138:
125:
124:
120:
112:
111:
107:
99:
98:
95:
91:
88:
85:
78:
74:
70:
67:
64:
41:
40:
30:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
910:
897:
893:
889:
884:
880:
876:
872:
868:
864:
860:
856:
852:
848:
847:comprehensive
844:
840:
836:
835:
834:
831:
827:
823:
820:
818:
815:
810:
801:
798:
796:
792:
788:
783:
779:
771:
767:
763:
760:
758:
755:
752:
748:
744:
742:
739:
735:
731:
727:
725:
722:
718:
714:
711:
709:
706:
702:
691:
679:
678:
671:
668:
665:
660:
657:
653:
649:
645:
643:
641:
635:
633:
629:
623:
621:
614:
610:
607:
604:
600:
595:
590:
586:
582:
581:
580:
579:
578:
577:
566:
563:
560:
556:
555:
554:
553:
550:
547:
542:
533:
532:
531:
530:
527:
524:
521:
516:
512:
511:
510:
509:
506:
503:
498:
489:
485:
482:
480:
477:
472:
462:
459:
456:
452:
447:
445:
442:
437:
427:
424:
421:
418:
415:
412:
411:
409:
406:
405:
402:
399:
396:
392:
389:
387:
384:
381:
377:
374:
372:
369:
366:
363:
362:
355:
352:
349:
345:
340:
339:
338:
335:
330:
320:
316:
313:
310:
305:
301:
297:
293:
289:
285:
282:
279:
274:
273:
272:
269:
264:
260:
256:
251:
246:
241:
235:
230:
225:
220:
214:
210:
209:
208:
205:
200:
199:
198:
197:
192:
189:
186:
181:
180:
179:
176:
172:
169:
168:
167:
166:
163:
160:
151:
148:
145:
142:
139:
136:
135:
134:
133:
129:
121:
117:
116:
115:
108:
104:
103:
102:
96:
92:
89:
86:
83:
79:
75:
71:
68:
65:
61:
60:
59:
56:
52:
51:
49:
48:
39:
38:
33:
32:
29:
26:
19:
887:
882:
878:
874:
870:
866:
862:
858:
854:
850:
846:
843:well written
842:
825:
821:
799:
765:
761:
746:
729:
716:
712:
700:
651:
639:
631:
627:
619:
598:
593:
588:
514:
487:revolution).
455:relationship
454:
450:
407:
390:
375:
364:
343:
170:
155:
127:
126:
113:
100:
57:
53:
45:
43:
42:
34:
408:Strong keep
380:violet/riga
213:FAC process
171:Strong Keep
35:Article is
28:Sun Yat-sen
869:factually
770:Flcelloguy
703:instead.--
628:historians
620:historians
268:Alabamaboy
263:User:Jiang
259:User:Jiang
204:Alabamaboy
175:Alabamaboy
82:Huang Xing
77:mentioned.
877:neutral.
734:Johnleemk
728:Definite
606:Your edit
451:influence
368:Borisblue
762:Comment:
867:minorly
855:neutral
830:HenryLi
826:improve
747:improve
713:Improve
705:Huaiwei
601:--: -->
596:--: -->
591:--: -->
119:twice).
859:stable
857:, and
777:note?
754:ntnood
730:remove
717:Remove
701:Remove
618:"Many
523:(talk)
398:(talk)
391:Remove
376:Remove
365:Remove
344:No one
751:Insta
16:<
824:and
822:keep
813:k C.
782:Desk
738:Talk
632:seen
545:k C.
501:k C.
475:k C.
440:k C.
333:k C.
254:k C.
233:k C.
123:out.
875:not
808:ryc
785:|
715:or
667:ang
652:are
562:ang
540:ryc
496:ryc
470:ryc
435:ryc
383:(t)
351:ang
328:ryc
312:ang
281:ang
249:ryc
228:ryc
188:ang
162:ang
894:]
892:Ji
871:in
853:,
849:,
845:,
805:De
802:.
780:|
775:A
736:|
664:Ji
642:."
636:,
624:,
559:Ji
537:De
493:De
467:De
432:De
348:Ji
325:De
309:Ji
278:Ji
185:Ji
159:Ji
791:S
787:W
772:|
244:e
239:D
223:e
218:D
84:?
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.