Knowledge (XXG)

:Featured article review/Agatha Christie: And Then There Were None/archive1 - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

198:
section wanders off into irrelevant development facts that are in the wrong section. The plot is unsourced and disproportionately long. The reception section is too brief and and poorly organised. There are dead links and inconsistent date formatting. The lead is broken up into five choppy paragraphs when it should be ~3.
411:
My chief concern is not that reliably sourced information is missing from the article, but that there is not enough good information out there to construct an article worthy of FA. Notably, there is very little content in the article linking the video game to the book, or describing its relationship
287:
It's in very bad shape, but it doesn't seem irredeemable. Sourcing has a ton of bad links that need archiving, as well as a few dodgy outlets that could be replaced, but none of that would require a major rewrite. Given the massive GOCE copyedit going on right now, I think this article might have a
197:
the article and raising several issues at the talk page. The major glaring problem is with the prose, which is full of awkward, dense and redundant syntax. The Gameplay section is poorly organised and difficult for non-players to follow, because many game mechanics aren't explained clearly and the
358:
article is underreferenced (my main concern is "Setting and characters" subsection), and plot is bloated. I also agree there could be more detail on reception. This article would automatically fail a GAN in its current state for its "unreferenced section" tag.
133: 126: 97: 92: 101: 194: 84: 149: 412:
in the larger context of text adventures and mid-2000s gaming, as one would expect from a work of art. Much of what a reader would expect from an FA is missing here.
88: 185: 458: 419: 403: 380: 347: 325: 297: 278: 263: 234: 217: 61: 80: 68: 181: 40: 154: 428: 30: 17: 439: 373: 256: 306:
The GOCE c/e is done and that has improved the article in some areas, but I think the issues that I raised still stand.
321: 213: 293: 225:
I can't formally tack down a Delist vote yet, but I agree that this page doesn't come close to FA-compliant.
338:
Concerns raised in the review section deal primarily with the prose, organization/coverage, and sourcing.
242:: This page is currently being edited by the GOCE. Let's see how that goes and then reassess the article. 454: 398: 343: 57: 289: 173: 367: 250: 388:, as per nomination. The article in its current state would barely pass a GAN, let alone a FAC 274: 230: 450: 389: 339: 317: 209: 53: 416: 177: 361: 244: 118: 446: 270: 226: 307: 199: 435:, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please leave the 413: 134:
Featured article review/Agatha Christie: And Then There Were None/archive1
127:
Featured article candidates/Agatha Christie: And Then There Were None
39:
Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at
159: 269:
Hmm, I'd prefer copyediting to be done last, but okay.
193:
I am nominating this featured article for review after
114: 110: 106: 466:The above discussion is preserved as an archive. 43:. No further edits should be made to this page. 472:No further edits should be made to this page. 445:template in place on the talk page until the 29:The following is an archived discussion of a 8: 41:Knowledge (XXG) talk:Featured article review 138: 81:Agatha Christie: And Then There Were None 69:Agatha Christie: And Then There Were None 141: 131: 124: 18:Knowledge (XXG):Featured article review 7: 24: 186:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors 420:21:53, 29 September 2014 (UTC) 404:09:02, 10 September 2014 (UTC) 348:01:34, 14 September 2014 (UTC) 1: 381:17:00, 8 September 2014 (UTC) 326:06:20, 8 September 2014 (UTC) 459:19:20, 5 October 2014 (UTC) 298:23:51, 28 August 2014 (UTC) 279:21:34, 28 August 2014 (UTC) 264:21:25, 28 August 2014 (UTC) 235:21:10, 28 August 2014 (UTC) 218:14:50, 26 August 2014 (UTC) 62:19:20, 5 October 2014 (UTC) 489: 469:Please do not modify it. 36:Please do not modify it. 440:featured article review 182:WikiProject Video Games 31:featured article review 429:removal candidate 189: 167: 166: 75:Review commentary 480: 471: 444: 438: 401: 396: 376: 370: 364: 314: 310: 259: 253: 247: 206: 202: 170: 139: 122: 104: 48:The article was 38: 488: 487: 483: 482: 481: 479: 478: 477: 476: 467: 442: 436: 399: 390: 374: 368: 362: 334: 332:FARC commentary 312: 308: 257: 251: 245: 204: 200: 95: 79: 77: 72: 34: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 486: 484: 475: 474: 462: 461: 449:goes through. 422: 406: 383: 352: 351: 333: 330: 329: 328: 290:JimmyBlackwing 282: 281: 191: 190: 165: 164: 163: 162: 160:External links 157: 152: 144: 143: 137: 136: 130: 129: 76: 73: 71: 66: 65: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 485: 473: 470: 464: 463: 460: 456: 452: 448: 441: 434: 430: 426: 423: 421: 418: 415: 410: 407: 405: 402: 397: 395: 394: 387: 384: 382: 379: 377: 371: 365: 357: 354: 353: 350: 349: 345: 341: 336: 335: 331: 327: 323: 319: 315: 305: 302: 301: 300: 299: 295: 291: 286: 280: 276: 272: 268: 267: 266: 265: 262: 260: 254: 248: 241: 237: 236: 232: 228: 224: 220: 219: 215: 211: 207: 196: 188: 187: 183: 179: 175: 169: 168: 161: 158: 156: 153: 151: 148: 147: 146: 145: 140: 135: 132: 128: 125: 123: 120: 116: 112: 108: 103: 99: 94: 90: 86: 82: 74: 70: 67: 64: 63: 59: 55: 51: 44: 42: 37: 32: 27: 26: 19: 468: 465: 432: 425:Closing note 424: 408: 392: 391: 385: 360: 355: 337: 303: 284: 283: 243: 239: 238: 222: 221: 192: 171: 155:Citation bot 78: 49: 47: 35: 28: 400:(´ ・ ω ・ `) 451:Nikkimaria 393:Satellizer 340:Nikkimaria 172:Notified: 54:Nikkimaria 431:has been 174:Paaerduag 433:delisted 427:: This 363:Snuggums 304:Comment: 288:chance. 285:Comment: 246:Snuggums 223:Comment: 195:auditing 150:Analysis 50:delisted 240:Comment 142:Toolbox 98:protect 93:history 417:(tock) 409:Delist 386:Delist 356:Delist 271:Tezero 227:Tezero 102:delete 375:edits 258:edits 119:views 111:watch 107:links 16:< 455:talk 414:Shii 369:talk 344:talk 294:talk 275:talk 252:talk 231:talk 178:Wuzh 115:logs 89:talk 85:edit 58:talk 447:bot 457:) 443:}} 437:{{ 372:/ 346:) 324:) 320:• 313:ZE 309:CR 296:) 277:) 255:/ 233:) 216:) 212:• 205:ZE 201:CR 184:, 180:, 176:, 117:| 113:| 109:| 105:| 100:| 96:| 91:| 87:| 60:) 52:. 33:. 453:( 378:) 366:( 342:( 322:c 318:t 316:( 311:4 292:( 273:( 261:) 249:( 229:( 214:c 210:t 208:( 203:4 121:) 83:( 56:(

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Featured article review
featured article review
Knowledge (XXG) talk:Featured article review
Nikkimaria
talk
19:20, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
Agatha Christie: And Then There Were None
Agatha Christie: And Then There Were None
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
Featured article candidates/Agatha Christie: And Then There Were None
Featured article review/Agatha Christie: And Then There Were None/archive1
Analysis
Citation bot
External links
Paaerduag
Wuzh
WikiProject Video Games
WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors
auditing
CR4ZE
t
c

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.