394:
There's too much uncited text in the article, at least six paragraphs. Refs are not presented in a consistent way - citations and used works should be separated, for instance. There's 1 ref without a title, only the authors (Lê Vinh Quốc, Nguyễn Thị Thư, Lê Phụng Hoàng??). There's 2 mondediplo
247:
had a mania about round hats, so his police would tear people's round hats off their heads and burn the offending items in the street. Thousands were arrested. And doesn't that
220:, SN did a bit of citation work, no other improvement here, there is still uncited text, inconsistent citations, and some of those listed as citations are unsourced footnotes.
283:
Sentences 2 and 4 of
Paragraph 1 should be combined and reduced. "In what is widely regarded as the greatest victory achieved by Napoleon" should be mixed into Sentence 5.
239:
Err yeah, sorry about that, I've got a lot of the sources (or others, sometimes, in their place), but I haven't looked at the napoleonic period for ages and had
269:
189:
166:
40:
86:
440:
30:
17:
286:(Pausing here to come back to the lead after reviewing WP:MILHIST material for their standards and reviewing the rest of the article).
470:
431:
412:
386:
362:
332:
311:
271:
234:
208:
191:
146:
125:
451:
104:
I am nominating this featured article for review because it was highlighed as not meeting the FA criteria more than 4 months ago
358:
259:
179:
156:
375:
300:
119:
91:
252:
196:
172:
149:
230:
408:
370:
The tags, inconsistent ref formatting, and unsourced notes are enough not to meet the FA criteria. (
466:
328:
204:
82:
72:
171:
I'm dealing with the citations: they are the least insurmountable of the problems this article has.
295:
The lead image is very high quality and high encyclopedic value. It could be a featured picture. (
352:
426:
221:
141:
404:
371:
296:
244:
114:
61:
462:
324:
200:
53:
348:
421:
136:
395:
citations without authors. I also spotted the use of a primary source (Tolstoy's
347:
can you take a look and comment here on whether this should be delisted or kept?
458:
380:
342:
305:
109:
57:
447:, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please leave the
399:) to cite the importance of the battle for Tolstoy's characters in
135:
The recurring lack of citations in this article is unacceptable. –
39:
Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at
107:
and there have not been significant improvements since.
323:
Issues in the review section largely concern sourcing.
105:
65:
403:. The article does not currently meet FA standards.
478:The above discussion is preserved as an archive.
43:. No further edits should be made to this page.
484:No further edits should be made to this page.
457:template in place on the talk page until the
29:The following is an archived discussion of a
8:
41:Knowledge (XXG) talk:Featured article review
18:Knowledge (XXG):Featured article review
7:
24:
1:
64:) 0:32, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
471:00:32, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
432:03:43, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
413:22:05, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
387:01:18, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
363:00:42, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
251:have to be an article...?!
501:
333:12:12, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
192:15:47, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
147:01:55, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
126:02:48, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
481:Please do not modify it.
312:05:05, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
272:17:38, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
235:17:13, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
209:14:32, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
36:Please do not modify it.
452:featured article review
31:featured article review
73:Battle of Austerlitz
131:Comments by Vami_IV
197:Any update on that
441:removal candidate
95:
492:
483:
456:
450:
429:
424:
383:
346:
308:
267:
257:
245:Paul I of Russia
227:
187:
177:
164:
154:
144:
139:
124:
79:
48:The article was
38:
500:
499:
495:
494:
493:
491:
490:
489:
488:
479:
454:
448:
427:
422:
381:
340:
319:
306:
260:
253:
243:forgotten that
225:
180:
173:
157:
150:
142:
137:
108:
102:
76:
34:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
498:
496:
487:
486:
474:
473:
461:goes through.
434:
415:
389:
365:
337:
336:
318:
315:
293:
292:
288:
287:
284:
275:
274:
237:
214:
213:
212:
211:
133:
132:
101:
100:Review section
98:
97:
96:
75:
70:
69:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
497:
485:
482:
476:
475:
472:
468:
464:
460:
453:
446:
442:
438:
435:
433:
430:
425:
419:
416:
414:
410:
406:
402:
401:War and Peace
398:
397:War and Peace
393:
390:
388:
385:
384:
377:
373:
369:
366:
364:
360:
357:
354:
350:
344:
339:
338:
335:
334:
330:
326:
321:
320:
316:
314:
313:
310:
309:
302:
298:
290:
289:
285:
282:
281:
280:
279:
273:
270:
268:
266:
264:
258:
256:
250:
246:
242:
238:
236:
232:
228:
224:
219:
216:
215:
210:
206:
202:
198:
195:
194:
193:
190:
188:
186:
184:
178:
176:
170:
169:
168:
167:
165:
163:
161:
155:
153:
148:
145:
140:
130:
129:
128:
127:
123:
122:
118:
117:
113:
112:
106:
99:
94:
93:
89:
88:
84:
78:
77:
74:
71:
68:
66:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
37:
32:
27:
26:
19:
480:
477:
444:
437:Closing note
436:
417:
400:
396:
391:
379:
367:
355:
322:
317:FARC section
304:
294:
277:
276:
262:
261:
254:
248:
240:
222:
218:Move to FARC
217:
182:
181:
174:
159:
158:
151:
134:
120:
115:
110:
103:
90:
80:
49:
47:
35:
28:
405:RetiredDuke
463:Nikkimaria
325:Nikkimaria
201:Nikkimaria
92:WT:MILHIST
83:UberCryxic
81:Notified:
54:Nikkimaria
443:has been
349:Cas Liber
445:delisted
439:: This
359:contribs
50:delisted
291:Comment
241:totally
226:Georgia
87:Austria
418:Delist
392:Delist
382:buidhe
368:Delist
343:Buidhe
307:buidhe
58:FACBot
428:_IV†♠
423:♠Vami
265:erial
223:Sandy
185:erial
162:erial
143:_IV†♠
138:♠Vami
16:<
467:talk
409:talk
353:talk
329:talk
278:Lead
249:just
231:Talk
205:talk
116:uidh
62:talk
56:via
459:bot
420:. –
233:)
52:by
469:)
455:}}
449:{{
411:)
378:)
374:·
361:)
331:)
303:)
299:·
255:——
207:)
199:?
175:——
152:——
85:,
67:.
33:.
465:(
407:(
376:c
372:t
356:·
351:(
345::
341:@
327:(
301:c
297:t
263:S
229:(
203:(
183:S
160:S
121:e
111:b
60:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.