72:
few inline citations, especially considering its 59 kb length. The scientific section, though it contains some references needs more references to be up to even GA standards. Its prose is not that great and could definitely be greatly improved with copy-edits (possibly trimming as well). For example,
318:
example of concrete, contructive collaboration that I have seen on a philosophy article on
Knowledge (XXG) since I've started on this thing back in January. I think we have genuinely managed to improved the article, while avoiding edit wars, personal quarrels and all the other nonsense that usually
255:
The article looks pretty good now — much better than when I put it under FAR. The references and the like are fine. I'm not very well-versed in philosophy, however, so I'll leave it to those who have been working on the article to determine if it's comprehensive enough to be considered an FA. Good
240:
If the consensus is that it has been brought back to FA status, it doesn't go to FARC. Even if it does go to FARC, that just gives you a longer period to work on the article, so not to panic :-)) Sometimes, editors don't get around to looking at an article seriously until it moves to FARC. I've
166:
I just read through the comments and some of the history of edit-warring and such on this thing. Could you perhaps extend that period to three YEARS?? Oh my!! I will need to call in the reserves on this one. But none of them seems to be home right now. This should be intersting. </terror:
340:
Most of the people I know are in the philosophy "depatrtment". I am extremely histant to ask for their specific input for two reasons, Sandy: 1) Most of the ones I trust have already worked on the article. 2) The others might (will!!) almost certainly want to add their own quotes, favorite
191:
09:13, 18 August 2006 (UTC) Latest assessment (somewhat subjective because personally involved though): significant improvements have been made. Not quite there yet, but we're making progress. Sections have been forked, the science section has been
109:
It might be salvagable in that case. There is a superabundance of research resources on the philosophical arguments about this topic on the
Internet alone. It might not be so easy with the scientific sections. But I'll start on it tomorrow, if
140:
Hey, Francesco, do you think you can fix it in a day or two (just kidding — the FAR process is actually 2 weeks of review, followed by another two weeks of FARC, only if necessary :-) I've been watching the statement in there about
344:
Many of the non-philosophical people I have some familiarty with, on the other hand, are hesitiant to edit such an article becuase it is not their field and so on. But I will see what I can do even in this respect, just for you (;?
241:
sometimes missed a few in the FAR stage, and found things that needed to be addressed only after it moved to FARC, but that doesn't mean the article will be delisted. As long as progress is ongoing, most reviewers are happy.
73:
in one section there are three quotations in a row (two from the same author) without sufficient prose that could be made to flow much better. What really kills it is the lack of references in most sections, however. —
206:
I agree that the article is greatly improved. It would be helpful if other reviewers would have a look, and comment on any work remaining to be done. Hopefully this one will avoid FARC. As
145:
for a long time. I have no idea what it's trying to say, so I hope you can address that. I can't figure out what a neurological condition has to do with Free will. Regards,
298:
Oh yeah it's comprehensive enough for an FA, indeed, the danger is that it will become too comprehensive and cease to be encyclopedic, but I think we've avoided that.
21:
196:
improved and there are many,many more citations. Still needs some rewrite on phi. section for content and quality of prose. More cites in several areas.--
52:
48:
17:
123:
It's frigthening, now that I look at it. Needs to be cut in half, at least. Completely reorginized. Prose is not the right word. --
319:
takes place. Some of you guys are fairly new and will tend to underestimate this accomplishment. Very impressive, folks.--
341:
philosphers, and so on, to an already realtively lengthy article. This could even lead to instaibility and edit-wars.
349:
335:
323:
302:
286:
245:
227:
214:
200:
172:
149:
127:
114:
103:
60:
278:
95:
264:
81:
332:
242:
211:
146:
142:
57:
282:
99:
346:
320:
224:
197:
188:
169:
124:
111:
331:
Major rewrite, article is well-referenced, can we get more opinions as to avoiding FARC?
40:
299:
271:
88:
31:
185:
Well, that's the way the consensus wants this thing apparently. Sickening!!
314:
There's one important observation I wanted to add: this is absolutely the
223:
What's the process? How could it be stopped from going into FARC anyway?--
257:
74:
207:
53:Knowledge (XXG) talk:WikiProject Neuroscience
8:
210:the article has been rewritten this week.
49:Knowledge (XXG) talk:WikiProject Philosophy
18:Knowledge (XXG):Featured article review
7:
28:
347:Francesco Franco aka Lacatosias
321:Francesco Franco aka Lacatosias
225:Francesco Franco aka Lacatosias
198:Francesco Franco aka Lacatosias
189:Francesco Franco aka Lacatosias
170:Francesco Franco aka Lacatosias
125:Francesco Franco aka Lacatosias
112:Francesco Franco aka Lacatosias
1:
350:07:09, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
336:23:40, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
324:20:03, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
303:19:27, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
287:17:29, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
246:21:44, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
228:12:42, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
215:11:46, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
201:07:50, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
173:21:05, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
150:22:28, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
128:21:34, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
115:21:29, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
104:03:55, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
61:20:33, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
365:
39:Article is still a
285:
143:Tourette syndrome
102:
68:This article has
47:Messages left at
356:
277:
274:
267:
260:
94:
91:
84:
77:
41:featured article
364:
363:
359:
358:
357:
355:
354:
353:
272:
265:
258:
208:the diff shows,
89:
82:
75:
35:
26:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
362:
360:
312:
311:
310:
309:
308:
307:
306:
305:
256:work, guys! —
253:
252:
251:
250:
249:
248:
233:
232:
231:
230:
218:
217:
182:
181:
180:
179:
178:
177:
176:
175:
157:
156:
155:
154:
153:
152:
133:
132:
131:
130:
118:
117:
66:
65:
64:
63:
34:
29:
27:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
361:
352:
351:
348:
342:
338:
337:
334:
330:
326:
325:
322:
317:
304:
301:
297:
296:
295:
294:
293:
292:
291:
290:
289:
288:
284:
280:
275:
269:
268:
261:
247:
244:
239:
238:
237:
236:
235:
234:
229:
226:
222:
221:
220:
219:
216:
213:
209:
205:
204:
203:
202:
199:
195:
190:
186:
174:
171:
165:
164:
163:
162:
161:
160:
159:
158:
151:
148:
144:
139:
138:
137:
136:
135:
134:
129:
126:
122:
121:
120:
119:
116:
113:
108:
107:
106:
105:
101:
97:
92:
86:
85:
78:
71:
62:
59:
56:
54:
50:
45:
44:
43:
42:
37:
36:
33:
30:
23:
19:
343:
339:
328:
327:
315:
313:
263:
254:
193:
184:
183:
80:
69:
67:
46:
38:
110:possible.--
194:massively
32:Free will
22:Free will
300:Bmorton3
283:Ethiopia
279:contribs
100:Ethiopia
96:contribs
20: |
329:Status?
333:Sandy
316:first
266:(Yom)
243:Sandy
212:Sandy
147:Sandy
83:(Yom)
58:Sandy
16:<
273:Talk
90:Talk
70:very
51:and
167:-->
345:--
281:•
276:•
270:|
262:|
259:ዮም
187:--
168:--
98:•
93:•
87:|
79:|
76:ዮም
55:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.