146:. Such wording implies that the State joined willingly, and it entirely omits to mention the invasion. Firstly, this is not neutral: it is bias towards the Hindu viewpoint that the annexation of Hyderabad was justified. I understand that saying the invasion was illegal would be seen as a Muslim viewpoint and also bias; however, the way to resolve such a disagreement is to come to a compromise, not select one view over another. I also feel that this phrase is neither comprehensive, since it omits key details, nor well-researched, since it does not reflect the prevailing consensus that Hyderabad was invaded and annexed. If
504:: The Climate section needs attention. The prose and the weatherbox disagree on figures repeatedly. They are cited to different sources, which themselves represent data for wildly disparate date ranges. The prose cites a source that claims anywhere from 18–50 "years on record", while the weatherbox is based on sources covering 1951–1980 and 1971–1990. This results in such anomalies as different months being determined the coldest (January or December?). Aside from the internal inconsistency issue, data that ends at 1980 or 1990 seems quite insufficient especially when it comes to climate.
406:
I noticed that the uploader at flickr had changed the license to one that is no longer compatible, but it is not possible to revoke rights once released. The image was originally uploaded to flickr as cc-by, and so it remains cc-by. The subsequent change at flickr to by-nc-nd is invalid. I have added
106:
I am nominating this featured article for review because since its promotion the new state of
Telangana has been created. This has introduced instability to the article, and a blanket change of all mentions of Andhra Pradesh to Telangana has resulted in frankly false statements such as the claim that
321:
I think the section should be kept since it is clearly an important point, but the note and notes section could be cut; I presume they are only there because there was disagreement over whether it was a common capital at first. Personally, I don't think it's a problem to quote from the act, given
122:
Hi, I understand your concerns, but I dont think there is any emergency to review the articles FA status, We had been visiting the article regularly and updated required changes and c/e. May be minor corrections are required which we can do with concensus by discussing on articles talkpage, I am
141:
There is now only one part of the article that I am not happy about, but as it is in the lead, and impacts on more than one of the featured article criteria, it is sufficient to preclude me from supporting the FA status of this article. Namely, the article says that
Hyderabad State
250:, having gotten a swift response to my one remaining concern. Even if the new wording does not take hold, I believe this single point (which only effects one word) should be resolvable through ordinary editing or on the talk page of the article.
620:
Oh, this made me laugh (at myself) so hard! It's awfully charitable of you not to point out that I appear to be losing it. That's what I get for working on content and sources in the wee hours.
552:, the numbers in the prose now match the weatherbox, but the underlying problem of out-of-date data remains: the weatherbox does not reflect any data from the past 25 (and sometimes 35) years.
181:
I see no opposition to this on the talk page. It is worded more fairly than the present but less concisely than one of the other alternatives, so I propose this as a third alternative wording.
580:
I couldn't find anything before either—NOAA only had figures for 1971–1990—but I got fed up and dug further, knowing that we have several other Indian city FAs. The climate sections on
98:
606:
That's the one I used above to update "to the figures collected 1951–2000". I'm reassured though, that someone else has also checked for sources and come up with the same.
592:
from the IMD, which contains data from 1951–2000 and does have figures for
Hyderabad as well. Wish I had looked this far earlier. Thoughts on incorporating this source?
548:
I think I wasn't clear. Before, we had numbers in the prose and the weatherbox that did not agree, and data in the weatherbox that was sorely out of date. With
40:
107:
Hyderabad is in the north-western part of
Telangana, which it isn't. The entire article needs copy-editing, fact-checking and updating.
566:
I can't find anything more recent for six of the nine parameters. I have updated the three others to the figures collected 1951–2000.
652:
94:
30:
17:
663:
266:
In the "Common capital of ... " section, I suggest we need either some re-phrasing or quote marks from the text supported by
267:
682:
629:
615:
601:
575:
561:
535:
513:
490:
463:
445:
416:
376:
358:
331:
312:
284:
259:
234:
220:
190:
132:
116:
65:
531:
308:
216:
162:
128:
90:
172:
486:
441:
354:
280:
322:
that it is clearly marked as a quote and it precludes disagreements if we just report what the act says.
527:
304:
212:
124:
394:
678:
625:
597:
557:
509:
477:
432:
345:
271:
61:
611:
571:
459:
412:
372:
327:
255:
230:
186:
112:
176:
84:
397:
is okay with CC liscense to keep in the article, as per image file it is sourced from
344:
which is not in quotes, or indicated as a quote, or paraphrased adequately ... ???
674:
621:
593:
553:
505:
473:
53:
299:
or atleast merge it into some suitable section, The same phrases are mentioned in
670:
158:, then something more substantial needs to be said, to avoid misleading readers.
57:
607:
581:
567:
523:
455:
425:
408:
368:
340:
DrK, you lost me on "clearly marked as a quote"? I'm talking about the top of
323:
251:
226:
196:
182:
108:
659:, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please leave the
300:
75:
589:
270:
Based on that, a spotcheck for close paraphrasing might be in order.
161:
The last discussion on the talk page that seems to tackle this issue (
585:
163:
Talk:Hyderabad/Archive 5#Corrections and clarifications needed....
39:
Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at
207:. "The city continued as the capital of Hyderabad State after
296:
549:
341:
68:
211:
the Indian Union in 1948". Hope it works. Regards :)--
690:The above discussion is preserved as an archive.
167:after joining the Indian Union in 1948, and ...
43:. No further edits should be made to this page.
696:No further edits should be made to this page.
669:template in place on the talk page until the
29:The following is an archived discussion of a
8:
175:with the Indian Union at the conclusion of
225:I've put it in. Let's see how it plays.
430:then I concur with Close without FARC.
295:It is better if we chopp that section
41:Knowledge talk:Featured article review
171:after 1948, when the Nizam signed an
7:
526:for your prompt action. Regards :)--
367:Yes, I see; I've added quote marks.
199:) highlighted, I suggest to replace
99:Noticeboard for India-related topics
24:
195:Sir, its a very valid point you (
18:Knowledge:Featured article review
123:ready to cooperate. Regards :)--
476:four days ago pending still.
428:, if you are still satisfied,
1:
417:08:05, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
377:23:18, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
359:21:19, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
332:18:31, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
313:18:19, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
285:16:01, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
260:08:46, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
235:08:09, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
221:23:05, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
191:17:54, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
144:join the Indian Union in 1948
133:19:06, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
117:12:08, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
395:image of Hyderabadi Biryani
713:
522:Hope its okay now, thanks
683:17:59, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
630:17:57, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
616:08:57, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
602:05:54, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
576:17:03, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
562:18:41, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
536:05:56, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
514:19:39, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
491:15:21, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
464:16:13, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
446:14:35, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
66:17:59, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
693:Please do not modify it.
150:cannot be replaced with
83:Talk page notification:
36:Please do not modify it.
664:featured article review
173:Instrument of Accession
31:featured article review
393:I am not sure if this
165:) suggests instead of
156:was incorporated into
407:a note to the file.
209:it was brought into
454:Still OK, thanks.
248:Close without FARC
95:WikiProject Cities
653:removal candidate
102:
704:
695:
668:
662:
483:
438:
399:
398:
351:
277:
82:
48:The article was
38:
712:
711:
707:
706:
705:
703:
702:
701:
700:
691:
666:
660:
481:
436:
349:
275:
79:
34:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
710:
708:
699:
698:
686:
685:
673:goes through.
645:
644:
643:
642:
641:
640:
639:
638:
637:
636:
635:
634:
633:
632:
541:
540:
539:
538:
528:Omer123hussain
517:
516:
498:
497:
496:
495:
494:
493:
472:Comments from
467:
466:
449:
448:
422:
421:
420:
419:
401:
400:
390:
389:
388:
387:
386:
385:
384:
383:
382:
381:
380:
379:
362:
361:
335:
334:
316:
315:
305:Omer123hussain
303:. Regards :)--
297:Common_capital
288:
287:
263:
262:
244:
243:
242:
241:
240:
239:
238:
237:
213:Omer123hussain
177:Operation Polo
159:
152:was annexed by
136:
135:
125:Omer123hussain
104:
103:
91:Omer123hussain
87:
78:
73:
72:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
709:
697:
694:
688:
687:
684:
680:
676:
672:
665:
658:
654:
650:
647:
646:
631:
627:
623:
619:
618:
617:
613:
609:
605:
604:
603:
599:
595:
591:
590:this document
587:
583:
579:
578:
577:
573:
569:
565:
564:
563:
559:
555:
551:
547:
546:
545:
544:
543:
542:
537:
533:
529:
525:
521:
520:
519:
518:
515:
511:
507:
503:
500:
499:
492:
488:
484:
480:
475:
471:
470:
469:
468:
465:
461:
457:
453:
452:
451:
450:
447:
443:
439:
435:
431:
427:
424:
423:
418:
414:
410:
405:
404:
403:
402:
396:
392:
391:
378:
374:
370:
366:
365:
364:
363:
360:
356:
352:
348:
343:
342:this section,
339:
338:
337:
336:
333:
329:
325:
320:
319:
318:
317:
314:
310:
306:
302:
298:
294:
293:
292:
291:
290:
289:
286:
282:
278:
274:
269:
265:
264:
261:
257:
253:
249:
246:
245:
236:
232:
228:
224:
223:
222:
218:
214:
210:
206:
202:
198:
194:
193:
192:
188:
184:
180:
178:
174:
169:the wording:
168:
164:
160:
157:
153:
149:
145:
140:
139:
138:
137:
134:
130:
126:
121:
120:
119:
118:
114:
110:
101:
100:
96:
92:
86:
85:December 2014
81:
80:
77:
74:
71:
69:
67:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
37:
32:
27:
26:
19:
692:
689:
656:
649:Closing note
648:
501:
478:
433:
429:
346:
272:
268:this source.
247:
208:
204:
200:
170:
166:
155:
151:
147:
143:
105:
88:
49:
47:
35:
28:
588:both cite
582:Darjeeling
89:Notified:
655:has been
550:this edit
76:Hyderabad
651:: This
179:. It ...
675:Maralia
622:Maralia
594:Maralia
554:Maralia
506:Maralia
502:Comment
482:Georgia
474:Maralia
437:Georgia
350:Georgia
276:Georgia
205:brought
148:joining
54:Maralia
586:Mysore
201:Joined
58:FACBot
608:DrKay
568:DrKay
524:DrKay
479:Sandy
456:DrKay
434:Sandy
426:DrKay
409:DrKay
369:DrKay
347:Sandy
324:DrKay
301:Notes
273:Sandy
252:DrKay
227:DrKay
203:with
197:DrKay
183:DrKay
109:DrKay
16:<
679:talk
657:kept
626:talk
612:talk
598:talk
584:and
572:talk
558:talk
532:talk
510:talk
487:Talk
460:talk
442:Talk
413:talk
373:talk
355:Talk
328:talk
309:talk
281:Talk
256:talk
231:talk
217:talk
187:talk
129:talk
113:talk
62:talk
56:via
50:kept
671:bot
154:or
52:by
681:)
667:}}
661:{{
628:)
614:)
600:)
574:)
560:)
534:)
512:)
489:)
462:)
444:)
415:)
375:)
357:)
330:)
311:)
283:)
258:)
233:)
219:)
189:)
131:)
115:)
97:,
93:,
70:.
64:)
33:.
677:(
624:(
610:(
596:(
570:(
556:(
530:(
508:(
485:(
458:(
440:(
411:(
371:(
353:(
326:(
307:(
279:(
254:(
229:(
215:(
185:(
127:(
111:(
60:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.