1130:"Jupiter was expected to either consist of a dense core, a surrounding layer of liquid metallic hydrogen (with some helium) extending outward to about 78% of the radius of the planet, and an outer atmosphere consisting predominantly of molecular hydrogen, or perhaps to have no core at all, consisting instead of denser and denser fluid (predominantly molecular and metallic hydrogen) all the way to the center, depending on whether the planet accreted first as a solid body or collapsed directly from the gaseous protoplanetary disk." - This is a hecking long sentence. Additionally, who thought this, when was this thought, and what was the rationale behind this thought?
649:; there is no possibility I can clean up the faulty prose in this article, so I have not checked other issues. Sample para: “Before the discoveries of the Voyager missions, Jupiter's moons were arranged neatly into four groups of four, based on commonality of their orbital elements. Since then, the large number of small outer moons discovered has complicated this picture. Jupiter's moons are currently thought do be divided into several different groups, although there are several moons which are not part of any group.” The Voyager seems to have rearranged the moons. And “Hot Jupitiers are usually tidally locked,“ ...
929:"The infobox is an unmitigated nightmare ... the prose issues in this article are well beyond what we should expect a copyeditor to be able to clean up". How can I possibly resist? I shall endeavour to sort out the prose. It may take a week or two. I mean, could I possibly make it worse? I shall not be adding any citations. As ever with my copy editing, I shall likely be bold - if you don't like something or don't understand why I have done it, either just revert or feel free to query me.
1195:, another stellar review from the Bacon. There is a real issue here that not a single astronomy editor has weighed in to help restore this FA, and there are at least a dozen astronomy FAs that are in similar shape. A sad state of affairs, but as I mentioned earlier, this cannot be corrected via a copyedit. We need content experts on board.
843:
number of small outer moons discovered has complicated this picture. Jupiter's moons are currently divided into several different groups, although there are several moons which are not part of any group." I don't know how to translate that to meaningful
English. ::*Do you know what a "captured asteroid" is or how to fix that?
1177:- I only made it about a quarter of the way through before giving up. Confusing and sometimes contradictory prose, dated sources, missing or unclear information. This needs a very heavy workover by someone familiar with astronomy and a new FAC. This isn't fixable with non-expert attention in a FAR.
1249:
The flyby table is mostly unsourced, the
Galilean moons' table is unsourced, stubby sentences, pages needed, the Mythology section looks very out of place between two science-y sections, dated sources. Above all this, I agree with Hog that the article is not accessible; it takes for granted that the
869:
How are all of these related, and how can one split up the sentence? "The orbits of most of the system's planets lie closer to
Jupiter's orbital plane than the Sun's equatorial plane (Mercury is the only planet that is closer to the Sun's equator in orbital tilt), the Kirkwood gaps in the asteroid
1005:
Apologies to all, but it doesn't look as if I will get round to this one. My new roles as a FAC coordinator and TFA blurb coordinator are more time consuming than I had anticipated, and combined with other Wiki-activities mean that I have bitten off more than I can chew. Apologies again, but I am
749:
on my talk. I don't know if the problems are now worse than before, but now that the MOS issues have been cleaned up (perhaps, I have not re-checked), it is apparent that the prose issues in this article are well beyond what we should expect a copyeditor to be able to clean up. Without fresh and
842:
Do you know what this means, as it relates to
Voyager? Am I just not understanding it because I lack the background? "Before the discoveries of the Voyager missions, Jupiter's moons were classified into four groups of four, based on commonality of their orbital elements. Since then, the large
299:
and image layout problems everywhere. If knowledgeable editors will delete those that are least useful (decorative), I am willing to go through and improve the layout. There are considerable images here that are not aiding our understanding of the topic; by reducing those, we can get a better
971:
Yeah, I had kinda worked that out. I'll see what I can do. I really am not at all sure that it is salvageable, but it may be; and for a copy editor it looks like a target-rich environment. :-) This is
Voyager 1, signing off as I fade into the vacuumous depths. I shall write if I find work.
1155:" The zones have been observed to vary in width, color and intensity from year to year, but they have remained sufficiently stable for scientists to name them" - We got a source more recent than the 1980s for this? Again, stuff from the 70s and 80s is probably dated for astrophysics stuff
1097:" In fact, some models predict the formation of Jupiter's analogues whose properties are close to those of the planet at the current epoch" - Unclear to a nonexpert what Jupiter's analogues are. Also, we seem to be using both analogues and analogs in different points in the article.
376:. FAs are supposed to be comprehensive, meaning there should be little in EL that can't be covered in the article. Ditto for Further reading ... are they all necessary? Do they add something to the article that we can't cover in a comprehensive article?
948:; the problem is, there is no one to revert or check you, as no one from WP Astronomy or WP Solar System has shown up, and there are problems where the prose needs to be made intelligible and checked for source-to-text accuracy ... you are on your own !!
990:
From what I've heard, the planet infoboxes were all standardized at some point. So I would advise not altering it (unless someone wants to get a bunch of astronomy folks to create a new standardized planet infobox design, that is), large as it may be.
1084:
the bit about the grand tack hypothesis states that
Jupiter was moving inward from the outer solar system, but then later we're told "Jupiter moving out of the inner Solar System would have allowed the formation of inner planets, including
1022:"Formation and migration" section looks unbalanced, if it's true that "the likelihood that the grand tack actually occurred in the solar nebula is very low"; it is being given undue weight. Otherwise the prose doesn't look too bad to me. (
1120:"When it was first formed, Jupiter was much hotter and was about twice its current diameter." - Cited to a source from 1974. Given the advances in outer space knowledge since 1974, this source seems a bit dated to be supporting a theory.
539:
The infobox is an unmitigated nightmare, taking over a huge part of the article (and everything in it needs to be checked to see if the content is included in the article, and cited). That infobox needs reformatting.
873:"Due to the magnitude of Jupiter's mass" really? Due to Jupiter's mass ? This is only from looking at one very small section; a copyeditor can do their best here, but a content expert needs to write this article.
1214:
This is only a partial review. I'm willing to go through the rest of the article if a content expert shows up, but I'm seeing very big flaws so far. The copy edits only masked the surface level of these problems.
495:
and remove the unnecessary, sample, Interactions between charged particles generated from Io and the planet's strong magnetic field likely resulted in redistribution of heat flow, forming the Spot.
1094:
So we described the grand tack in a manner that suggest that it probably happened, and then say "Moreover, the likelihood that the grand tack actually occurred in the solar nebula is very low".
1110:"and relatively more ices and are thus" - As an aside, I was taught in elementary school that these ices were literal water ice, when apparently it's a name for a fancy class of volatiles.
1107:"Helium is also depleted to about 80% of the Sun's helium composition" - So is Jupiter itself depleting helium? It's unclear why this helium is depleted and what exactly this signifies.
463:
It is easy to spot sporadic, uncited text. Samples in the "Moons" and "Interaction with the Solar System" sections. The entire article should be scanned for uncited or outdated text.
674:
866:
In term of copyediting to FA standards, we have in the "Interaction with the Solar System" section, two subsequent paras starting with "Along with ... " vary the prose.
366:, but some may be deemed necessary and retained (editor discretion). Installing this script will add an item to your toolbox that shows duplicate links in red:
111:
This is a 2007 promotion that has not been maintained to standard. There has been an Update needed tag since May 2020, and there has been no response to the
267:
Tagged dated: The temperature at the core boundary is estimated to be 36,000 K (35,700 °C; 64,300 °F) and the interior pressure is roughly 3,000–4,500 GPa.
94:
750:
complete engagement by content experts to revise the entire article, I don't think this is doable within the scope of a FAR. The prose is atrocious.
40:
90:
1158:
The lead says the Great Red Spot has been known since the 17th century, while the body says that the mention in the 1600s source is not certain.
870:
belt are mostly caused by
Jupiter, and the planet may have been responsible for the Late Heavy Bombardment of the inner Solar System's history."
605:: I think the major issues have been dealt with. Overlinking is not enough to delist it and the infobox is just like the other planet articles.
115:
The original author is retired and has not edited in six years. Issues include outdated and uncited text, and some prose and MOS problems.
1268:
30:
17:
1279:
152:
I've had a look, but it's too much work in an area that doesn't give me as much motivation as other regions of
Knowledge (XXG).
466:
The "Mythology" section looks like a collection of stuffy, one-sentence paragraph trivia; should be rationalized to paragraphs.
492:
1027:
1045:
No idea where to go next: no astronomy editors weighing in to tell us if the article is any good = delist by default?
1236:
I agree that this article needs significant input by a content expert, that is willing to put in considerable effort.
801:
did a copyedit of the article. I know you said that a copyedit wouldn't be enough, but another look wouldn't hurt.
401:
Does See also need trimming? That is, why aren't those worked in to the article (in instances where they can be)?
113:
talk page notification from 19 November 2020 or the expanded list of items needing attention I placed a week ago.
1298:
1259:
1224:
1209:
1186:
1059:
1038:
1015:
1000:
981:
962:
938:
917:
887:
861:
839:, this is why I say we need a content expert rather than a copyeditor to sort the prose. Perhaps it's just me.
830:
810:
788:
764:
736:
711:
686:
663:
637:
614:
593:
575:
554:
533:
511:
482:
454:
417:
392:
349:
335:
316:
283:
258:
233:
208:
187:
161:
147:
129:
367:
1074:
The lead says that it may have a rocky core, but rocks aren't mentioned in the section about the core at all.
1238:(There is a number of old FAs on astronomical objects that have fallen into obvious disrepair, for instance
1161:
If the planetary atmosphere is 5,000 km, and the cloud layer is only 50 km, then what is the other 4,950 km?
816:
Thanks so much, LittleJerry; I will look when I have a free moment. Which may not be soon :) Best regards,
1205:
1055:
1011:
977:
958:
934:
883:
826:
760:
732:
659:
633:
571:
550:
529:
331:
183:
125:
905:
427:
1255:
913:
857:
806:
784:
682:
610:
589:
507:
478:
450:
413:
388:
345:
312:
279:
254:
229:
204:
157:
143:
86:
363:
1294:
901:
707:
435:
1220:
1182:
1246:
could not attract an astronomy editor, I worry about the rest of the articles. But I digress.)
1196:
1046:
1007:
973:
949:
945:
930:
874:
817:
794:
751:
723:
650:
624:
562:
541:
520:
322:
174:
116:
373:
1251:
1170:, there's currently only a passing mention in the Galileo probe section and an image caption
1023:
909:
853:
849:
836:
802:
780:
746:
678:
606:
585:
503:
474:
446:
409:
384:
341:
308:
275:
250:
225:
200:
153:
139:
135:
82:
61:
1290:
996:
703:
53:
1149:
1216:
1178:
1239:
897:
798:
296:
1286:
1032:
431:
57:
992:
196:
1275:, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please leave the
1242:, that does not need an expert to point out the overabundance of images. If
722:
The best way forward is to give this article a fresh start with a new FAC.
1070:
I've been asked to give this a review, so I'll be looking through this.
72:
720:
Delist this article is now worse than it was when it appeared at FAR.
39:
Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at
702:
Issues raised in the review section include prose and sourcing.
292:
Has the issue in the section just above this one been resolved?
1166:
The
Shoemaker-Levy impact should probably be described in the
1091:
Estimates of the age of
Jupiter are never explicitly stated.
561:
The "Analogs" section is a list that should be prosified.
217:
There is an update tag on the "Internal structure" section
779:. I think the other major issues have been dealt with.
372:
External links probably could benefit from a trim, per
112:
98:
65:
623:
Keep or delist are not declared during the FAR phase.
138:, maybe you could tackle this like you did for Earth?
852:
is an asteroid that ended up in the planet's orbit.
242:
There is an update tag on the "Juno mission" section
1250:reader is well-versed in the subject. Needs work.
1088:It's assumed that readers know what a gas giant is
1306:The above discussion is preserved as an archive.
426:The "Impacts" section has a plethora of issues.
43:. No further edits should be made to this page.
1312:No further edits should be made to this page.
1285:template in place on the talk page until the
362:There are considerable duplicate links. See
199:maybe you could update the internal section.
29:The following is an archived discussion of a
8:
41:Knowledge (XXG) talk:Featured article review
776:Keep if the Copyeditors Guild gets to this
745:Strike and rephrase per conversation with
1140:"These are sub-divided into lighter-hued
675:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors Request
18:Knowledge (XXG):Featured article review
7:
24:
99:talk page notification 2020-11-19
64:) 2:01, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
1:
1006:standing back from this one.
789:22:56, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
615:22:56, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
594:20:46, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
576:16:55, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
555:16:52, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
512:22:56, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
483:13:39, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
455:16:50, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
418:13:39, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
393:13:39, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
350:13:39, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
336:16:52, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
317:13:39, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
300:layout on the ones that stay.
284:17:30, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
259:13:39, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
234:22:29, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
209:21:10, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
188:14:27, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
162:14:22, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
148:18:16, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
130:00:01, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
1299:22:01, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
1260:23:06, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
1225:17:08, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
1210:17:00, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
1187:16:57, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
1060:22:19, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
1039:18:34, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
1016:11:59, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
1001:23:22, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
534:19:20, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
982:23:01, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
963:22:52, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
939:22:39, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
918:23:24, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
888:22:43, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
862:23:40, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
831:17:59, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
811:17:52, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
765:18:42, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
737:15:38, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
712:15:36, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
687:02:20, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
664:02:04, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
638:02:04, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
430:(rewrite it as prose), and
1329:
1309:Please do not modify it.
368:User:Evad37/duplinks-alt
36:Please do not modify it.
1280:featured article review
1079:Formation and migration
31:featured article review
1148:" - Surely this fails
1066:Comments from Hog Farm
493:WP:CITATION OVERKILL
491:Keep an eye out for
1125:Internal structure
1269:removal candidate
1247:
850:captured asteroid
673:Listed this as a
102:
1320:
1311:
1284:
1278:
1237:
1202:
1052:
1035:
955:
880:
823:
757:
729:
656:
630:
568:
547:
526:
328:
180:
122:
79:
48:The article was
38:
1328:
1327:
1323:
1322:
1321:
1319:
1318:
1317:
1316:
1307:
1282:
1276:
1223:
1200:
1185:
1168:Impacts section
1050:
1033:
953:
902:Devonian Wombat
878:
821:
755:
727:
698:
654:
628:
566:
545:
524:
326:
178:
173:, no progress,
120:
109:
95:WP Solar System
76:
34:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1326:
1324:
1315:
1314:
1302:
1301:
1289:goes through.
1262:
1248:
1230:
1229:
1228:
1227:
1219:
1181:
1172:
1171:
1163:
1162:
1159:
1156:
1153:
1150:MOS:BADITALICS
1132:
1131:
1122:
1121:
1112:
1111:
1108:
1099:
1098:
1095:
1092:
1089:
1086:
1076:
1075:
1063:
1062:
1042:
1041:
1019:
1018:
1003:
987:
986:
985:
984:
966:
965:
927:
926:
925:
924:
923:
922:
921:
920:
906:Christophe1946
891:
890:
871:
867:
846:
845:
844:
792:
791:
770:
769:
768:
767:
740:
739:
716:
715:
697:
694:
693:
692:
691:
690:
667:
666:
643:
642:
641:
640:
599:
598:
597:
596:
579:
578:
558:
557:
519:Done for now,
517:
516:
515:
514:
497:
496:
488:
487:
486:
485:
468:
467:
464:
460:
459:
458:
457:
440:
439:
423:
422:
421:
420:
403:
402:
398:
397:
396:
395:
378:
377:
370:
359:
358:
357:
356:
355:
354:
353:
352:
302:
301:
293:
289:
288:
287:
286:
269:
268:
264:
263:
262:
261:
244:
243:
239:
238:
237:
236:
219:
218:
214:
213:
212:
211:
191:
190:
167:
166:
165:
164:
108:
107:Review section
105:
104:
103:
75:
70:
69:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1325:
1313:
1310:
1304:
1303:
1300:
1296:
1292:
1288:
1281:
1274:
1270:
1266:
1263:
1261:
1257:
1253:
1245:
1241:
1235:
1232:
1231:
1226:
1222:
1218:
1213:
1212:
1211:
1207:
1203:
1199:
1194:
1191:
1190:
1189:
1188:
1184:
1180:
1176:
1169:
1165:
1164:
1160:
1157:
1154:
1151:
1147:
1143:
1139:
1138:
1137:
1136:
1129:
1128:
1127:
1126:
1119:
1118:
1117:
1116:
1115:Mass and size
1109:
1106:
1105:
1104:
1103:
1096:
1093:
1090:
1087:
1083:
1082:
1081:
1080:
1073:
1072:
1071:
1068:
1067:
1061:
1057:
1053:
1049:
1044:
1043:
1040:
1037:
1036:
1029:
1025:
1021:
1020:
1017:
1013:
1009:
1004:
1002:
998:
994:
989:
988:
983:
979:
975:
970:
969:
968:
967:
964:
960:
956:
952:
947:
943:
942:
941:
940:
936:
932:
919:
915:
911:
907:
903:
899:
895:
894:
893:
892:
889:
885:
881:
877:
872:
868:
865:
864:
863:
859:
855:
851:
847:
841:
840:
838:
834:
833:
832:
828:
824:
820:
815:
814:
813:
812:
808:
804:
800:
796:
790:
786:
782:
778:
777:
772:
771:
766:
762:
758:
754:
748:
744:
743:
742:
741:
738:
734:
730:
726:
721:
718:
717:
714:
713:
709:
705:
700:
699:
695:
689:
688:
684:
680:
676:
671:
670:
669:
668:
665:
661:
657:
653:
648:
645:
644:
639:
635:
631:
627:
622:
621:
620:
619:
618:
617:
616:
612:
608:
604:
595:
591:
587:
583:
582:
581:
580:
577:
573:
569:
565:
560:
559:
556:
552:
548:
544:
538:
537:
536:
535:
531:
527:
523:
513:
509:
505:
501:
500:
499:
498:
494:
490:
489:
484:
480:
476:
472:
471:
470:
469:
465:
462:
461:
456:
452:
448:
444:
443:
442:
441:
437:
433:
429:
425:
424:
419:
415:
411:
407:
406:
405:
404:
400:
399:
394:
390:
386:
382:
381:
380:
379:
375:
371:
369:
365:
361:
360:
351:
347:
343:
339:
338:
337:
333:
329:
325:
320:
319:
318:
314:
310:
306:
305:
304:
303:
298:
294:
291:
290:
285:
281:
277:
273:
272:
271:
270:
266:
265:
260:
256:
252:
248:
247:
246:
245:
241:
240:
235:
231:
227:
223:
222:
221:
220:
216:
215:
210:
206:
202:
198:
195:
194:
193:
192:
189:
185:
181:
177:
172:
169:
168:
163:
159:
155:
151:
150:
149:
145:
141:
137:
134:
133:
132:
131:
127:
123:
119:
114:
106:
101:
100:
96:
92:
88:
84:
78:
77:
74:
71:
68:
66:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
37:
32:
27:
26:
19:
1308:
1305:
1272:
1265:Closing note
1264:
1243:
1240:Titan (moon)
1233:
1197:
1192:
1174:
1173:
1167:
1145:
1141:
1135:Cloud layers
1134:
1133:
1124:
1123:
1114:
1113:
1101:
1100:
1078:
1077:
1069:
1065:
1064:
1047:
1031:
1008:Gog the Mild
974:Gog the Mild
950:
946:Gog the Mild
931:Gog the Mild
928:
875:
818:
795:SandyGeorgia
793:
775:
773:
752:
724:
719:
701:
696:FARC section
672:
651:
647:Move to FARC
646:
625:
602:
601:
600:
563:
542:
521:
518:
502:Fixed some.
428:WP:PROSELINE
323:
321:Not fixed.
297:MOS:SANDWICH
175:
171:Move to FARC
170:
154:Femke Nijsse
117:
110:
91:WP Astronomy
80:
49:
47:
35:
28:
1252:RetiredDuke
1144:and darker
1102:Composition
910:LittleJerry
854:LittleJerry
837:LittleJerry
803:LittleJerry
781:LittleJerry
747:LittleJerry
679:LittleJerry
607:LittleJerry
586:LittleJerry
504:LittleJerry
475:LittleJerry
447:LittleJerry
432:MOS:CURRENT
410:LittleJerry
385:LittleJerry
364:WP:OVERLINK
342:LittleJerry
309:LittleJerry
276:LittleJerry
251:LittleJerry
226:LittleJerry
201:LittleJerry
140:LittleJerry
136:Femkemilene
87:Kwamikagami
1291:Nikkimaria
704:Nikkimaria
445:Fixed????
295:There are
81:Notified:
54:Nikkimaria
1271:has been
436:WP:TRIVIA
408:Trimmed.
249:Updated.
224:Removed.
1273:delisted
1267:: This
1217:Hog Farm
1179:Hog Farm
944:Thanks,
896:pinging
50:delisted
1244:Jupiter
1201:Georgia
1051:Georgia
954:Georgia
898:Chidgk1
879:Georgia
822:Georgia
799:Chidgk1
756:Georgia
728:Georgia
655:Georgia
629:Georgia
567:Georgia
546:Georgia
525:Georgia
473:Fixed.
383:Fixed.
374:WP:ELNO
327:Georgia
307:Fixed.
274:Fixed.
179:Georgia
121:Georgia
73:Jupiter
1234:Delist
1193:Delist
1175:Delist
1085:Earth"
1034:buidhe
584:Done.
83:RJHall
58:FACBot
1198:Sandy
1146:belts
1142:zones
1048:Sandy
993:Aza24
951:Sandy
876:Sandy
819:Sandy
753:Sandy
725:Sandy
652:Sandy
626:Sandy
564:Sandy
543:Sandy
522:Sandy
340:Now?
324:Sandy
197:Rod57
176:Sandy
118:Sandy
16:<
1295:talk
1256:talk
1221:Talk
1206:Talk
1183:Talk
1056:Talk
1012:talk
997:talk
978:talk
959:Talk
935:talk
914:talk
904:and
884:Talk
858:talk
835:OK,
827:Talk
807:talk
785:talk
761:Talk
733:Talk
708:talk
683:talk
660:Talk
634:Talk
611:talk
603:Keep
590:talk
572:Talk
551:Talk
530:Talk
508:talk
479:talk
451:talk
414:talk
389:talk
346:talk
332:Talk
313:talk
280:talk
255:talk
230:talk
205:talk
184:Talk
158:talk
144:talk
126:Talk
62:talk
56:via
1287:bot
1208:)
1058:)
961:)
886:)
829:)
763:)
735:)
662:)
636:)
574:)
553:)
532:)
438:???
334:)
186:)
128:)
52:by
1297:)
1283:}}
1277:{{
1258:)
1030:)
1026:·
1014:)
999:)
980:)
937:)
916:)
908:.
900:,
860:)
848:A
809:)
797:,
787:)
710:)
685:)
677:.
613:)
592:)
510:)
481:)
453:)
434:.
416:)
391:)
348:)
315:)
282:)
257:)
232:)
207:)
160:)
146:)
97:,
93:,
89:,
85:,
67:.
33:.
1293:(
1254:(
1204:(
1152:?
1054:(
1028:c
1024:t
1010:(
995:(
976:(
957:(
933:(
912:(
882:(
856:(
825:(
805:(
783:(
774:'
759:(
731:(
706:(
681:(
658:(
632:(
609:(
588:(
570:(
549:(
528:(
506:(
477:(
449:(
412:(
387:(
344:(
330:(
311:(
278:(
253:(
228:(
203:(
182:(
156:(
142:(
124:(
60:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.