239:
per the above. 18 months is plenty of time for a thorough review, I believe. If the concerns raised were quick fixes... well, if that were the case, someone would have done it already. As it stands, this sits closer to "Comprehensive rewrite to account for more current sourcing/literature" than quick
99:
I am nominating this featured article for review because it has not been updated with high quality sources since 2006 and thus many of the refs are old. Also a number of primary sources are used rather than high quality secondary sources. Also I just deleted a 1/3 of the article as it was little more
40:
259:
159:
30:
17:
246:
222:. A quick look shows a number of unreferenced comments still not fixed since the article was nominated for removal 18 months ago.
270:
182:
115:
202:
Concerns raised in the review section include sourcing and whether the article is representative of the current literature.
289:
250:
231:
211:
190:
186:
152:
138:
123:
119:
148:
143:
Transcluded this FAR to the main FAR page, so more people can see this and hopefully will repair the article.
227:
144:
86:
178:
111:
285:
241:
223:
134:
61:
207:
163:
170:
103:
281:
165:
53:
277:
130:
72:
57:
169:
This has been open for more than a year. Wondering if we should delist it now.
203:
167:
82:
266:, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please leave the
39:
Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at
101:
65:
129:This needs to be delisted for the reasons stated.
297:The above discussion is preserved as an archive.
43:. No further edits should be made to this page.
303:No further edits should be made to this page.
276:template in place on the talk page until the
29:The following is an archived discussion of a
8:
41:Knowledge (XXG) talk:Featured article review
100:than spam added by likely paid editors.
18:Knowledge (XXG):Featured article review
7:
24:
1:
153:15:16, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
139:17:16, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
64:) 3:56, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
124:18:43, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
320:
290:23:56, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
232:21:52, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
251:15:53, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
212:16:47, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
191:16:03, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
300:Please do not modify it.
36:Please do not modify it.
271:featured article review
31:featured article review
260:removal candidate
249:
90:
311:
302:
275:
269:
245:
175:
160:FAR coordinators
145:Hanif Al Husaini
108:
79:
48:The article was
38:
319:
318:
314:
313:
312:
310:
309:
308:
307:
298:
273:
267:
198:
171:
104:
97:
76:
34:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
317:
315:
306:
305:
293:
292:
280:goes through.
253:
234:
216:
215:
197:
194:
156:
155:
141:
96:
95:Review section
93:
92:
91:
75:
70:
69:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
316:
304:
301:
295:
294:
291:
287:
283:
279:
272:
265:
261:
257:
254:
252:
248:
243:
238:
235:
233:
229:
225:
221:
218:
217:
214:
213:
209:
205:
200:
199:
195:
193:
192:
188:
184:
180:
176:
174:
168:
166:
164:
161:
154:
150:
146:
142:
140:
136:
132:
128:
127:
126:
125:
121:
117:
113:
109:
107:
102:
94:
89:
88:
84:
78:
77:
74:
71:
68:
66:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
37:
32:
27:
26:
19:
299:
296:
263:
256:Closing note
255:
242:UltraExactZZ
236:
224:Dudley Miles
219:
201:
196:FARC section
172:
157:
105:
98:
80:
49:
47:
35:
28:
73:Keratoconus
83:User:BillC
81:Notified:
282:Cas Liber
262:has been
173:Doc James
106:Doc James
264:delisted
258:: This
183:contribs
116:contribs
54:Casliber
50:delisted
240:fixes.
237:Delist
220:Delist
131:Jytdog
87:WT:MED
58:FACBot
204:DrKay
187:email
120:email
16:<
286:talk
228:talk
208:talk
179:talk
149:talk
135:talk
112:talk
62:talk
56:via
278:bot
247:Did
52:by
288:)
274:}}
268:{{
230:)
210:)
189:)
185:·
181:·
162::
151:)
137:)
122:)
118:·
114:·
85:,
67:.
33:.
284:(
244:~
226:(
206:(
177:(
158:@
147:(
133:(
110:(
60:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.