183:, a group reviewing over 4000 FAs that were promoted between 2004 to 2010. When an article is close to meeting the FA criteria, I try to fix it myself or leave it for others. However, this article's Further Reading section is extensive and would take me months to learn about this subject, read the relevant material, and filter out the high-quality sources and material. This would pull me away from reviewing other articles that are much closer to meeting FA criteria. If you are interested in fixing up the article, I am willing to copyedit it and review it once improvements are complete, as I am doing for several articles already at FAR.
130:
sources. After comparing the current article to the promoted version from 2009, I see sources were added to "Works Cited" that might not be the highest quality; considering the amount of literature on this person, the article can remove less reputable sources that might be acceptable in other FA articles.
129:
I am nominating this featured article for review because the article has become bloated, with multiple short paragraphs that need to be merged or deleted. The article has an extensive "Further
Reading" section, whose works should be included in the article or not listed if they are not high-quality
261:
I am happy to help address and fix the concerns that I pointed out at the top. I posted my notice on June 19, 2021, outlining different concerns than what was given by another editor in 2020. No one answered the notice on the talk page, and there was one reverted edit and some minor fixes until I
240:
I have to concur with EEng. This is one I'm honestly not sure why it was still on FARGIVEN, let alone why it was taken to FAR -- there was quite a bit of editing after the FAR notice to improve the issues brought up. The complaints given here don't strike me as at the severity justifying FAR.
262:
posted here. The goal of this exercise isn't to take away featured status, it's to improve the article. If you (or someone else) is willing to help with improvements, I am willing to help analyse the sources, copyedit, and review the article to ensure this is still meeting FA criteria.
148:. Why invoke this ponderous process when you've identified three simple areas of concern you could raise on the talk page or address yourself? However, I will say in advance, with regard to one of those areas, that the idea that paragraphs are supposed to be of a certain length is pure
221:
If you find an unreadable FA, please notice it and bring it to FAR. This process encourages editors to revisit articles they wrote a decade ago and improve their quality. Sometimes the FAR nudge causes an editor to make improvements. Also, I encourage you to go to review articles at
197:
I'll just chalk this up to the ongoing mystery of why so much energy is invested in deciding which articles should/should not carry the little star, instead of just improving articles, period. The weird thing is that many FAs are close to unreadable.
114:
90:
102:
110:
98:
86:
94:
106:
302:
If I am the only one with concerns about its FA status, then there is probably a consensus to close this as a keep. I will respect the consensus.
40:
322:
30:
17:
333:
288:
Are there issues outstanding wrt the FA criteria, or are we at a place where this should be closed without proceeding to FARC?
352:
311:
297:
271:
252:
247:
235:
209:
192:
167:
156:
high quality -- are you saying they still shouldn't be listed, that there shouldn't be a
Further Reading section?
139:
152:. And now that I think about it, what about "Further Reading" entries which are not included in the article but
149:
82:
258:
242:
348:
293:
223:
180:
145:
61:
344:
307:
289:
267:
231:
188:
135:
53:
204:
162:
340:
57:
303:
263:
227:
184:
131:
329:, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please leave the
216:
199:
174:
157:
72:
39:
Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at
121:
118:
115:
WikiProject
Religion/New religious movements work group
65:
360:The above discussion is preserved as an archive.
43:. No further edits should be made to this page.
226:. We always need more editors helping us out.
366:No further edits should be made to this page.
339:template in place on the talk page until the
91:WikiProject Biography/Politics and government
29:The following is an archived discussion of a
8:
103:WikiProject Islam/Muslim scholars task force
111:WikiProject Politics/American politics
41:Knowledge talk:Featured article review
7:
179:I reviewed this article as part of
24:
99:WikiProject Civil Rights Movement
18:Knowledge:Featured article review
1:
312:14:30, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
298:16:12, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
64:) 3:09, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
87:WikiProject African diaspora
353:03:09, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
383:
95:Version 1.0 Editorial Team
272:03:48, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
253:03:27, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
236:18:29, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
210:17:54, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
193:17:41, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
168:17:14, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
140:16:09, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
107:WikiProject New York City
363:Please do not modify it.
36:Please do not modify it.
334:featured article review
31:featured article review
323:removal candidate
125:
374:
365:
338:
332:
259:Vaticidalprophet
220:
178:
150:WP:MISSSNODGRASS
79:
48:The article was
38:
382:
381:
377:
376:
375:
373:
372:
371:
370:
361:
336:
330:
214:
172:
76:
34:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
380:
378:
369:
368:
356:
355:
343:goes through.
316:
315:
314:
285:
284:
283:
282:
281:
280:
279:
278:
277:
276:
275:
274:
127:
126:
75:
70:
69:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
379:
367:
364:
358:
357:
354:
350:
346:
342:
335:
328:
324:
320:
317:
313:
309:
305:
301:
300:
299:
295:
291:
287:
286:
273:
269:
265:
260:
256:
255:
254:
251:
250:
246:
245:
239:
238:
237:
233:
229:
225:
218:
213:
212:
211:
208:
207:
203:
202:
196:
195:
194:
190:
186:
182:
176:
171:
170:
169:
166:
165:
161:
160:
155:
151:
147:
144:
143:
142:
141:
137:
133:
124:
123:
120:
116:
112:
108:
104:
100:
96:
92:
88:
84:
83:Malik Shabazz
78:
77:
74:
71:
68:
66:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
37:
32:
27:
26:
19:
362:
359:
326:
319:Closing note
318:
248:
243:
224:WP:URFA/2020
205:
200:
181:WP:URFA/2020
163:
158:
153:
128:
80:
49:
47:
35:
28:
345:Nikkimaria
290:Nikkimaria
146:WP:SOFIXIT
122:06-19-2021
119:05-28-2020
81:Notified:
54:Nikkimaria
325:has been
244:Vaticidal
73:Malcolm X
321:: This
249:prophet
58:FACBot
304:Z1720
264:Z1720
228:Z1720
185:Z1720
132:Z1720
16:<
349:talk
327:kept
308:talk
294:talk
268:talk
232:talk
217:EEng
189:talk
175:EEng
136:talk
62:talk
56:via
50:kept
341:bot
257:Hi
206:Eng
164:Eng
154:are
52:by
351:)
337:}}
331:{{
310:)
296:)
270:)
234:)
191:)
138:)
117:,
113:,
109:,
105:,
101:,
97:,
93:,
89:,
85:,
67:.
33:.
347:(
306:(
292:(
266:(
230:(
219::
215:@
201:E
187:(
177::
173:@
159:E
134:(
60:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.