Knowledge

:Featured article review/Paragraph 175/archive1 - Knowledge

Source 📝

196:
chance that I can bring it up to current FA standards. I never saw the sources myself; they are in German, which I read decently, but not well enough to work my way through multiple books and do re-research (especially now that I'm working an intense, full-time job); and, in any event, I doubt that any large number of those sources would be available to me here in Seattle. So even though I translated the bulk of this, I'm very unlikely to be able to help.
236:
creativity to make the poster at least potentially copyrightable; the representation of the § symbol as a meathook might or might not be. (I have no idea whether German law required registration of copyright in 1975; in order for it to be PD in the U.S. it would have to have been PD in Germany as of 1-1-1996, and I don't know how to go about determining that.) —
201:
I would strongly recommend improving the citations in the German original and then bringing them over rather than working on this primarily and directly in the English Knowledge. And I realize that will probably not be a fast route to bringing this up to the level of citation currently required for
195:
Yup. I basically translated this from the German Knowledge at a time when our (and their) citation standards were a lot more lax. The German original had been heavily discussed and vetted. I'm quite confident it is an accurate article and extremely informative on its topic. But there is almost no
235:
Frankly, their citation standards are still lax. I live in Germany and read German easily, but I too have an intense full-time job and don't have time to go to the library to do the amount of research required to bring this up to today's FA standards. I think the drawing of the fist is enough
221:
rises to the level of copyrightable (so there may be no rights issue at all). In any event, it would be trivial to overwrite the image with a lower resolution equivalent: it's a rather minimal black-and-white poster that would look almost identical as a very coarse JPEG. -
341:. As a jurist, I feel tempted to try to improve, but my knowledge of German law is too limited, and, in order to look through German sources, I would like to have the cooperation a good German speaker. But again I do not if it can be saved within this FARC's time limits.-- 136:
are problematic. Both are larger than 100,000 pixels (i.e. not low-resolution); neither is used in conjunction with direct critical commentary (neither the poster itself nor the film itself is discussed in the text), and
403:. The article has a lot going for it, but its dearth of inline citations is a problem (especially for the tables of Prosecutions/Convictions numbers). The lack of english references doesn't help its case, either. -- 118:
Lack of inline citations. Most (but not all!) direct quotations are cited, but individual claims in paragraphs are not. One claim has been tagged "citation needed" for almost a year and a half!
253: 21: 44: 218: 138: 129: 170: 89: 133: 34: 17: 174: 93: 114:
This is an old FA, from 2004, when FA criteria weren't applied as strictly as they are today. It has a number of issues:
407: 395: 375: 350: 330: 301: 269: 247: 230: 210: 188: 156: 107: 337:
Short lead, listy in some parts, undercited, and not at FA level at all. Therefore, as it is now, it should be
391: 368: 346: 257: 360: 326: 121:
Much of the article seems to use German Knowledge as a source, but Wikipedias are not considered
290:, but I'm no lawyer, and the German articles are so full of legalese they make my eyes cross. — 280: 384: 342: 227: 207: 404: 296: 265: 242: 183: 151: 102: 286: 322: 68: 57: 122: 223: 203: 162: 81: 284:, then it's not PD. I'd expect the drawing of the fist is enough to make it a 291: 261: 237: 178: 166: 146: 97: 85: 252:
In Germany, there is no registration required. Since the enactment of the
145:
For these reasons, I don't think the article is up to FA standard. —
320:
Suggested FA criteria concerns are referencing (1c) and images (3).
43:
Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at
61: 415:The above discussion is preserved as an archive. 47:). No further edits should be made to this page. 421:No further edits should be made to this page. 33:The following is an archived discussion of a 8: 141:doesn't even have a fair-use rationale. 219:Image:Poster against Paragraph 175.jpg 139:Image:Poster against Paragraph 175.jpg 130:Image:Poster against Paragraph 175.jpg 45:Knowledge talk:Featured article review 256:(1966), works are protected 70 years 7: 358:- short lead, lack of references. 134:Image:Paragraph175filmdvdcover.jpg 28: 18:Knowledge:Featured article review 217:By the way, I'm not at all sure 1: 171:WP:WikiProject LGBT studies 90:WP:WikiProject LGBT studies 438: 408:05:22, 7 August 2008 (UTC) 396:08:57, 5 August 2008 (UTC) 376:03:23, 21 July 2008 (UTC) 351:17:45, 18 July 2008 (UTC) 331:13:24, 18 July 2008 (UTC) 302:13:23, 29 June 2008 (UTC) 270:09:14, 29 June 2008 (UTC) 248:06:56, 28 June 2008 (UTC) 231:04:57, 28 June 2008 (UTC) 211:04:53, 28 June 2008 (UTC) 189:16:50, 27 June 2008 (UTC) 177:have all been notified. — 157:16:38, 27 June 2008 (UTC) 108:16:50, 27 June 2008 (UTC) 96:have all been notified. — 418:Please do not modify it. 40:Please do not modify it. 35:featured article review 175:WP:WikiProject Germany 94:WP:WikiProject Germany 60:13:21, 7 August 2008 128:The non-free images 254:Urheberrechtsgesetz 278:the poster meets 75:Review commentary 429: 420: 388: 371: 363: 123:reliable sources 52:The article was 42: 437: 436: 432: 431: 430: 428: 427: 426: 425: 416: 386: 383:, unimproved. 369: 361: 316: 314:FARC commentary 77: 72: 38: 26: 25: 24: 12: 11: 5: 435: 433: 424: 423: 411: 410: 398: 378: 353: 334: 333: 315: 312: 311: 310: 309: 308: 307: 306: 305: 304: 281:Schöpfungshöhe 214: 213: 198: 197: 192: 191: 143: 142: 126: 119: 112: 111: 76: 73: 71: 66: 65: 50: 49: 29: 27: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 434: 422: 419: 413: 412: 409: 406: 402: 399: 397: 393: 389: 382: 379: 377: 373: 372: 365: 364: 357: 354: 352: 348: 344: 340: 336: 335: 332: 328: 324: 321: 318: 317: 313: 303: 300: 299: 295: 294: 289: 288: 283: 282: 277: 273: 272: 271: 267: 263: 260:Greeting, -- 259: 255: 251: 250: 249: 246: 245: 241: 240: 234: 233: 232: 229: 225: 220: 216: 215: 212: 209: 205: 200: 199: 194: 193: 190: 187: 186: 182: 181: 176: 172: 168: 164: 161: 160: 159: 158: 155: 154: 150: 149: 140: 135: 131: 127: 124: 120: 117: 116: 115: 110: 109: 106: 105: 101: 100: 95: 91: 87: 83: 79: 78: 74: 70: 69:Paragraph 175 67: 64: 62: 59: 58:User:Marskell 55: 48: 46: 41: 36: 31: 30: 23: 22:Paragraph 175 19: 417: 414: 400: 380: 370:bananabucket 367: 359: 355: 338: 319: 297: 292: 287:kleine Münze 285: 279: 275: 243: 238: 184: 179: 152: 147: 144: 113: 103: 98: 80: 53: 51: 39: 32: 343:Yannismarou 274:Okay, then 163:User:Jmabel 82:User:Jmabel 202:an FA. - 167:User:Amys 86:User:Amys 362:Blnguyen 323:Marskell 20:‎ | 405:maclean 387:Georgia 339:removed 54:removed 401:Remove 381:Remove 356:Remove 258:p.m.a. 224:Jmabel 204:Jmabel 173:, and 92:, and 385:Sandy 16:< 392:Talk 347:talk 327:talk 266:talk 262:kh80 228:Talk 208:Talk 132:and 56:by 394:) 374:) 349:) 329:) 298:gr 293:An 276:if 268:) 244:gr 239:An 226:| 206:| 185:gr 180:An 169:, 165:, 153:gr 148:An 104:gr 99:An 88:, 84:, 63:. 37:. 390:( 366:( 345:( 325:( 264:( 125:.

Index

Knowledge:Featured article review
Paragraph 175
featured article review
Knowledge talk:Featured article review
User:Marskell

Paragraph 175
User:Jmabel
User:Amys
WP:WikiProject LGBT studies
WP:WikiProject Germany
An
gr
16:50, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
reliable sources
Image:Poster against Paragraph 175.jpg
Image:Paragraph175filmdvdcover.jpg
Image:Poster against Paragraph 175.jpg
An
gr
16:38, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
User:Jmabel
User:Amys
WP:WikiProject LGBT studies
WP:WikiProject Germany
An
gr
16:50, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
Jmabel
Talk

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.