458:
Probably yes, because, as I wrote last month I was down to 3 tags for which I could not find citations and maybe, in that case, the statements should be removed. I don't really know if they are verifiable, I just can't verify them. Your advise will be happily take but at this stage i've done my best.
350:
There are still 6 tags left out of the original 13 for which I have been unable to find citations though I have inproved several other citations that were questioned. While I expect the tagged statements are valid perhaps someone else can find source for them or possibly copyedit those sentences.
439:
How are things going here? Ww2censor, it appears that you and Ceoil have done some very good work on this article. There are a few (I think I saw three?) fact tags still left, and works appears to have stalled. Are we at the point that we can start pinging in reviewers to look over the article?
275:
I'm doing some work on the current citations fixing those I can and trying to find replacements for others. After that I may try to address the missing citation tags. The
Erskine May book is on Google books, The peerage has been used all over wikipedia for peerage information and appears to be
126:
144:
139:
193:
121:
365:
Ok and good work Ww2, I'll take over and have been reading up anyway. Just to say two that the article isn't very well written, to say the least, and needs a brush from start to finish.
134:
21:
207:
I am nominating this featured article for review because it has multiple tags, is a 2004 promotion last reviewed in 2007, and notice of the citation situation was
336:
I've had food poisoning and no internet for several days, so bear with me. However if anyone else can assist please do as I didn't know the topic before this.
92:
87:
96:
44:
79:
185:
189:
564:
34:
17:
161:
575:
594:
553:
538:
521:
496:
482:
468:
449:
420:
402:
388:
374:
360:
345:
324:
307:
285:
269:
222:
393:
Famous last words Ww ;) Can you keep an eye pls. We have worked well in the past, I would appreciate if you tended at least.
166:
276:
reliable. The scottishhistory seems to be a complete copy of an official treaty; perhaps I can find the original.
517:
83:
534:
218:
590:
445:
379:
Appreciated Ceoil though I am not the one to copyedit or rewrite it. You are far better at that than I.
513:
303:
478:
464:
416:
384:
356:
341:
281:
251:
Reference 28 points to a list of search results, instead of the content it is supposed to point to.
75:
68:
527:
408:
211:
586:
492:
441:
57:
398:
370:
320:
299:
474:
460:
412:
380:
352:
337:
277:
113:
242:
582:
488:
394:
366:
316:
571:, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please leave the
298:
Issues raised in the review section mostly concerned citations and sourcing.
235:
315:
Noting the ongoing work by ww2censor. Looks like this might be saved.
231:
The
Erskine May citation is 404 and appears to be a personal website.
43:
Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at
257:
As mentioned, lots of unsourced content from
September 2011.
171:
127:
Featured article candidates/Representative peer/archive1
208:
109:
105:
101:
61:
351:
I've pretty much done all I can to rescue this one.
145:
Featured article review/Representative peer/archive2
140:
Featured article review/Representative peer/archive1
254:Huge number of dead references that need updating.
602:The above discussion is preserved as an archive.
122:Featured article candidates/Representative peer
47:. No further edits should be made to this page.
608:No further edits should be made to this page.
581:template in place on the talk page until the
33:The following is an archived discussion of a
8:
135:Featured article review/Representative peer
194:WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom
150:
153:
132:
119:
45:Knowledge talk:Featured article review
248:At least one reference is a bare URL.
196:. The main contributor is long gone.
7:
411:. I'm now down to 3 cn tags left.
28:
18:Knowledge:Featured article review
1:
421:11:02, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
403:23:46, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
389:23:37, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
375:23:20, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
361:23:10, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
346:13:19, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
325:10:13, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
308:13:56, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
286:19:57, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
270:03:37, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
223:17:42, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
512:- Seems to be all set now.
625:
483:22:16, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
469:16:25, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
450:12:38, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
605:Please do not modify it.
595:19:36, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
554:04:16, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
539:04:41, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
522:02:29, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
473:One last citation left.
40:Please do not modify it.
576:featured article review
526:Much better, thanks !
497:04:26, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
35:featured article review
209:given over a year ago.
407:Unforced image per
76:Representative peer
69:Representative peer
60:15:36, 2 June 2013
22:Representative peer
546:per improvements.
245:a reliable source?
238:a reliable source?
565:removal candidate
203:Review commentary
198:
179:
178:
616:
607:
580:
574:
551:
549:Ten Pound Hammer
531:
267:
265:Ten Pound Hammer
215:
182:
151:
117:
99:
58:User:Dana boomer
52:The article was
42:
624:
623:
619:
618:
617:
615:
614:
613:
612:
603:
578:
572:
547:
529:
514:Judgesurreal777
294:
292:FARC commentary
263:
213:
205:
149:
90:
74:
72:
38:
26:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
622:
620:
611:
610:
598:
597:
585:goes through.
557:
556:
541:
524:
506:
505:
504:
503:
502:
501:
500:
499:
453:
452:
436:
435:
434:
433:
432:
431:
430:
429:
428:
427:
426:
425:
424:
423:
328:
327:
312:
311:
293:
290:
289:
288:
261:
260:
259:
258:
255:
252:
249:
246:
239:
232:
204:
201:
200:
199:
177:
176:
175:
174:
172:External links
169:
164:
156:
155:
148:
147:
142:
137:
131:
130:
129:
124:
71:
66:
65:
50:
49:
29:
27:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
621:
609:
606:
600:
599:
596:
592:
588:
584:
577:
570:
566:
562:
559:
558:
555:
550:
545:
542:
540:
536:
532:
525:
523:
519:
515:
511:
508:
507:
498:
494:
490:
486:
485:
484:
480:
476:
472:
471:
470:
466:
462:
457:
456:
455:
454:
451:
447:
443:
438:
437:
422:
418:
414:
410:
406:
405:
404:
400:
396:
392:
391:
390:
386:
382:
378:
377:
376:
372:
368:
364:
363:
362:
358:
354:
349:
348:
347:
343:
339:
335:
332:
331:
330:
329:
326:
322:
318:
314:
313:
310:
309:
305:
301:
296:
295:
291:
287:
283:
279:
274:
273:
272:
271:
266:
256:
253:
250:
247:
244:
240:
237:
233:
230:
229:
227:
226:
225:
224:
220:
216:
210:
202:
197:
195:
191:
187:
181:
180:
173:
170:
168:
165:
163:
160:
159:
158:
157:
152:
146:
143:
141:
138:
136:
133:
128:
125:
123:
120:
118:
115:
111:
107:
103:
98:
94:
89:
85:
81:
77:
70:
67:
64:
62:
59:
55:
48:
46:
41:
36:
31:
30:
23:
19:
604:
601:
568:
561:Closing note
560:
548:
543:
509:
333:
297:
264:
262:
206:
183:
167:Citation bot
73:
53:
51:
39:
32:
587:Dana boomer
442:Dana boomer
241:What makes
236:The Peerage
234:What makes
186:WP Politics
184:Notified:
487:Supplied.
409:WP:IMGSIZE
300:Nikkimaria
190:WP Ireland
567:has been
475:ww2censor
461:ww2censor
413:ww2censor
381:ww2censor
353:ww2censor
338:ww2censor
278:ww2censor
563:: This
334:Comment:
162:Analysis
20: |
530:Georgia
228:Yikes:
214:Georgia
154:Toolbox
93:protect
88:history
489:Choess
192:, and
97:delete
528:Sandy
395:Ceoil
367:Ceoil
317:Ceoil
212:Sandy
114:views
106:watch
102:links
16:<
591:talk
569:kept
544:Keep
535:Talk
518:talk
510:Keep
493:talk
479:talk
465:talk
446:talk
417:talk
399:talk
385:talk
371:talk
357:talk
342:talk
321:talk
304:talk
282:talk
243:this
219:Talk
110:logs
84:talk
80:edit
54:kept
583:bot
552:•
268:•
56:by
593:)
579:}}
573:{{
537:)
520:)
495:)
481:)
467:)
448:)
419:)
401:)
387:)
373:)
359:)
344:)
323:)
306:)
284:)
221:)
188:,
112:|
108:|
104:|
100:|
95:|
91:|
86:|
82:|
63:.
37:.
589:(
533:(
516:(
491:(
477:(
463:(
444:(
415:(
397:(
383:(
369:(
355:(
340:(
319:(
302:(
280:(
217:(
116:)
78:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.