1512:, hence it does not meet the standards needed for a featured article. The delegates do not write the criteria, we simply enforce them as they were written by the community - if you wish to change the standards, please go to the criteria page and start a discussion. Otherwise, the best way to get this article passed would either be to help Ling.Nut find verification on the images or find new images for the article. I do agree with Ling that this criteria makes it hard on writers who work on non-English, non-recent topics, but delegates cannot simply ignore the criteria because they don't like them in a certain situation.
1672:
before 1945 (author of photo unknown)". Publication claims should be backed by a source, or naming and giving details about the specific publication. The publication date thus becomes an issue; if the photograph was published in Taiwan before 1945, it falls under
Japanese copyright law, which would make it public domain. However, if published later, it falls under the Chinese copyright law that gives 50 years of post-publication protection. Hence, if a pre-1945 photograph is first published in 1970, the protection is until 2021. That said, the image should be using a US tag (to denote copyright status in the US)
422:- I've left notes on the talk pages of Malleus and Elcobbola for an image and prose check. Ling.Nut, I noted your comment on Jj98's page, and wanted to clarify that if an article is deemed "keep-worthy" in a short period of time, it doesn't have to be here for a month. That is only in the case of articles likely to be delisted, to give editors a long period of time to jump in and start fixing! If a good prose, reference and image check are done by a couple of uninvolved, experienced editors and they state here that the article should be kept then it can be off the page immediately.
1279:- Actually, this article seems rather quite good, especially with regards to sourcing/referencing. :) However, might I make a teensy-tiny suggestion to just consider changing the cite format to in-line-citations? The current citation style works just fine, as it is meticulously done throughout the article and not simply sporadic, in this particular case, just might make things more uniform throughout and a bit easier for the reader and for future research. Just a thought and suggestion, is all, feel free to take it or leave it. Cheers, --
851:. I don't really see very much wrong with this article, and certainly nothing sufficiently serious to warrant an FAR as opposed to a discussion its talk page. I don't understand the 1c) objection at all, apart from a few dead links which ought to be easy to sort out. Nothing is perfect however, and if I was being hypercritical I might say that the prose is a little awkward in a few places, such as "Japanese rule ended the practice by 1930, but some elder Taiwanese can recall the practice" at the end of the
346:. There's a balance involved – if people redlink a lot of terms that will never be notable enough to warrant a separate article, then it uglifies the current article. However, redlinks also encourage the creation of new articles or new redirects, both of which are useful... In the present case, I removed several redlinks that looked hopelessly non-notable to me, but I also created one or two redirects or repaired links (e.g., I fixed redlinks to
1997:, there are quite a few niggling MOS issues to be worked through still-- page number formatting, italics and bold, image captions. I also wonder if so much linking of well known countries is needed? Also, FAs should be comprehensive-- why can't some of the "See also" be worked into the article? Are all of those External links needed? None of this is significant, but it should be addressed before closing the FAR.
1813:), as the image's description indicate. I did not see the name of the author anywhere on the poster, and assume that s/he was an employee of China's People's Government, or an artist commissioned by the government. As to the licensing, I leave any possible improvements to those with better knowledge of such things. --
1679:
I don't actually believe I can dance well enough to make this image acceptable. I didn't even believe it at the time that I added it to the template. Quite frankly, I do not believe there are any images at all in
Commons that would meet even the loosest criteria of minimum acceptability to be placed
1205:
In a number of cases, a
University as a publisher is far less reputable than the associated University Press as a publisher (Universities publish with the reputation of the Chancellor / President / Vice Chancellor, University Presses publish with the reputation of their Editor-in-Chief). If you nail
238:
I've fixed most of the dead links already. I'm kinda shocked the
Formosan Language Archive is a dead link. I wanna leave it alone for a couple days, to see if it is a temporary problem... I'm having problems finding Ho-hi-yan radio station info; does it still exist? I updated the population info to
1868:, I am inclined to believe the PD tags for those photographs are correct. Although stricken, an administrator's help in chronicling the transfers (stating to the effect of what the original statements made on Knowledge were) on those Commons pages would be better for the project in the long term.
1646:
Disclaimer: I just passed a GA for
Jappalang. I didn't know anything about his img reviews at FAR; just now saw on ElC's talk that he was mentioned as an alternate reviewer. I went to ElC's talk just now only to see why he was AWOL. I reviewed Jappalang's article because it was ahead of mine in the
1458:
These photo standards strongly reinforce the tendency toward systemic bias (and recentism as well, though to a considerably lesser degree), by placing undue burden on editors who wish to edit in topic areas other than those coming from the United States, Australia and
England. To wit, these photos
1671:
One of the most wide-spread misconceptions I see on
Knowledge is thinking that creation is publication. The latter term involves making several copies of the work and distributing (either giving or selling) them to the public. Hence, I am hesitant about "collection of old photographs published
1195:
In my opinion, nailing the cites on publishers is a bit iffy. Books often change publishers; publishers often change names, etc. The publishers (or at least, the vast majority of them) were accurate at the time of writing, and they are still accurate in that sense. I will try to clean up the few
1530:
you could have just removed the problematic pictures instead of all this nonsense. The image concerns mentioned are ridiculous nitpickery anyway, which as ling.nut has menioned poses impossible requirement for a lot of articles on non-American subjects. One thing is trying to enforce a standard
1967:
I am still very unhappy with FAC/FAR/FARC's ivory tower, procrustean views on image issues; I believe that a more reasonable, sensible and realistic approach would save editors a boatload of pointless trouble and hours of time, and would close this FAR/FARC immediately. But what's to be done?
1148:
The article currently fails 2c on style and requires a sub-edit for style consistency to meet 2c. Fixing the 2c style problems has to wait until the 1c/2c quality of reference issues to do with publisher and page runs is fixed by someone with access to the
Taiwanese national deposit library's
1120:
I'd put a time estimate for the job at something between 4 and 8 hours, due to extensive repeated bibliographic look-ups. I'd be happy to sort the style issues, but I'm not touching the correctness issues, in part due to the article's reliance on
Taiwanese republications of overseas material.
795:
Consider a photographer aged 27 (i.e. born 1870) who lived to age 81 (i.e. died 1941). They could have created a work in 1897 and not yet have been dead 70 years. Creation date has nothing to do with date of author death, and this wasn't created at a time (e.g. 1797) at which no author could
992:
The other conference papers (several) were published in a bound volume; I treated them as chapters in a book. The Shih, Cheng-Feng paper (at the time I added it, anyhow) was not published in a volume. I believe it follows APA style. Just FYI, the fmt here is LSA, which is a flavor of
1222:(ec) Hey, when you point out the Suenari ref and say the period after the year in parentheses is unacceptable, are you saying there are inconsistencies somewhere, or simply that it is unacceptable to place a period there at any time? If it is the latter, then I am afraid that I must
1571:
Go ahead, go look at the images in
Commons. If we use those images, the article will look like a poop smear. No one benefits. Moreover, we will not (in reality) have moved from non-compliance to compliance with copyright laws, since the images are now and will continue to be
376:
Third, did I miss the rule about .png or .svg being mandatory? I know image-geeks prefer them, but is there a rule about this somewhere? Moreover, one image formatting problem (if it is a problem, which I doubt) is not enough to call FAR. It's yet another case of
927:
Bibliographic items cited out of style for that kind of work (lacking quotes around title), ie (Rolett, Barry V., Jiao, Tianlong & Lin, Gongwu (2002). Early seafaring in the Taiwan Strait and the search for Austronesian origins. Journal of Early Modern History
876:
I also don't see any problems that would merit a delisting. All of the concerns could have been adressed within ten minutes of editing or talk page discussion (image rights problems could have been adrssed by simply removing the images untill the status is
639:
Only to those who can't be bothered to research its meaning. PMA is Post Mortem Auctoris (after the author's death). Supplementary is an adjective form of supplement. You'll find it in the dictionary. I've not said it isn't PD. Please read critically.
1069:
Incorrectly cited, wrong style used, dissertations have their own style generally, and aren't "published" by the University: "Chou, Hui-Min (2005). Educating urban indigenous students in Taiwan: Six teachers’ perspectives. University of Maryland: Doctoral
1467:". If I were to pay to board an airplane, fly to the University of Tokyo (where the photos are held), and find someone to translate for me as I spoke to a librarian who would dig through boxes in their basement to find the relevant publication, I
677:
The US does not consider PMA for published works; it doesn't matter who the author was or when they died if the work was published, as this was. It just needs a supplemental license (i.e. in addition to the present one) indicating this. Adding
1135:
I hardly think that altering "MIT" to "MIT Press" would take more than a few seconds, but let me remind you that the purpose here is to consider whether FAs justify their status, not whether they can be improved. Anything can be improved.
903:
is miscited as being published by MIT when it was published by MIT Press. Suggest a thorough refcheck. Library of Congress isn't the best bibliographic authority, I found Wilson's correct publisher by searching for academic reviews.
1848:
template for a tidier look would do good as well). The current image pages give no trail (broken by the way they had been transferred) for re-users (who are not administrators of both servers) to verify the author and public domain
1555:
in some box in a basement of the University of Tokyo. And yes, I did use the word "adult" in the first sentence. Reviewers cannot simply ignore real-world shortcomings in data display. That would be throwing your arms wide open to
392:
Fourth, one citation needed is not a crisis; it is certainly not enough to call FAR. That particular passage has been the subject of two or three politically-motivated (but brief and minor) edit wars over the past couple years. The
859:, which is how the lead starts off, but towards the end it's been transmogrified into "Taiwanese Aboriginese", and capitalisation appears rather random thereafter. But again, this isn't sufficient to justify and FAR in my opinion.
1680:
atop this page which also happen to be in possession of the full array of metadata which would verify the (patently true) fact that it is PD. If you can see an image that works, then by all means throw it up on the board. •
1236:
There are inconsistencies, some sources ( Eyton, Laurence (2004, March 3). ) have terminal full-stops in the bibliographic lines. Other sources ( Faure, David (2001). ) lack these. The complaint about the "Articles" in
1660:: I do not see the unstricken images above in the article, so I think those are resolved (by removal from article). However, I do have the following queries to make (not knowing if they had been reviewed previously).
1463:, at least not anywhere easily accessible. There is no source that says, "oh by the way, these photos were published in 1901 by the University's anthropology department, or as a part of a French-language monograph by
1473:
be able to find written documentation of this fact. Otherwise, however, there is no hope. Score one for systemic bias on Knowledge; only recent English-language articles can pass the Procrustean photos standards..
449:
Source: "Source Rukai Chief visiting Department of Anthropology in Tokyo Imperial University during the Japanese rule. 日本四國德島縣出身ㄝ鳥居龍藏1896年開始攝ㄝ原住民全紀錄 東京帝国大学人類学教室を訪れたルカイ族・マンタウラン社の頭目（正面）". Is it in the wrong place?
1750:
I can cobble up a new map based on the SVG, but what are the specifics for the distribution? "SA (Scientific American) Traditional Chinese version "Diversity of Taiwan" (科學人《多樣性台灣》)" is no help when no issue,
1531:
another is being reasonable about it, and a third thing is being reasonable about AND conducting reviews in away that respects the contributors who spend their time writing material for this encyclopedia.
223:
1C? It's very well researched, and well cited. I don't think there are any referencing concerns at all with this article. I'm reviewing redlinks and dead links to see what needs to be done on that score.
189:
I am nominating this featured article for review because there are several dead links, including red links, and 1c issues. This article was promoted to FA status in 2007 and it hasn't been review since.
1983:
I have engaged in some positive email dialog with a person who uploaded some images that Jappalang found on Flickr. This should create some progress. Thanks to Jappalang and NordNordWest for the map. •
129:
2035:
It looks like the table thing has been taken care of - good. Do you have image clearance from Jappalang? The number of images looks fine, there's no definite number and too many is worse than too few.
1770:
1031:(ie: Hsiau, A-chin (1997). Language Ideology in Taiwan: The KMT’s language policy, the Tai-yü language movement, and ethnic politics. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 18.4.)
122:
354:). The two redlinks you list above are extinct tribes. Some day someone may find enough material to write a short article on them. This is not a FAR-worthy complaint; it really wasn't one
536:
What is underlying distribution data? I see this: "This page was GFDL licensed by its creator, Mababa (talk · contribs) on 07:53, 23 January 2005. --Ling.Nut 04:16, 19 March 2007 (UTC)" •
1206:
the missing bibliographic data (one publication data item, a bunch of pages of journal articles, two probable incorrect publishers on University Presses), I'll sub-edit the style issues.
594:, which doesn't have source information. I'm not bothered, as I think this image is sufficiently original, but note that long-term stability maybe be jeopardized without that sourcing.
786:
Perhaps the fact that the pictures were taken in 1897 might be a tip-off? The uploaders etc. provided source info in Japanese. They are Chinese-speakers on the Chinese Knowledge. •
1938:. The lead is not a faithful summary of the article (criterion 2a). It contains a lot of information not mentioned in the main text (about Austronesian languages, for instance).
1412:- I think we're just waiting on image clearance at this point. LingNut, if you could make sure all concerns are addressed and then ping Elcobbola, it would be much appreciated!
630:
What is PMA? What is a supplementary license? You do everyone a disservice by lapsing into jargon. This image was published in 1877... if it isn't PD, then PD does not exist.•
1261:
OK thanks. I dunno if I'll copy that section into user pace and work there, or if I may need to put off working for a day or two.. but either way, I'll get on it. Thanks... •
1549:
Or alternatively, you could act like an adult and recognize that the images are PD, but that the metadata which establishes that fact, if it exists anywhere, exists in
1796:
855:
section. One thing I really do think needs to be sorted out though is the inconsistent capitalisation of "aborigines" and "aboriginal". The article title is clearly
492:
1227:
format they want for refs, (as I know, much to my chagrin as a reviewer), so long as they are consistent. There is no "right" or "wrong" way to do them. Thanks. •
1508:
Lambanog, the reason this article hasn't been removed a long time ago is outstanding image concerns. Per Elcobbola's comments, it doesn't meet criteria 3 of the
1077:
An editor has reinserted this cite, which I consider to be immensely suspect (almost ridiculous, in fact). However, I need to play fair and give the editor
2014:
New image uploaded to sidebar. I believe it should be OK (have discussed with Jappalang).... I am sick of looking for images; is this a sufficient number?
1297:
tags? That would be a huge, huge change. It would take a couple days' off and on work. Moreover, the current ref style is the style I always saw in uni.•
1074:
Incorrectly placed as a footnote (out of style): "^ Davidson, James Wheeler (1903). The Island of Formosa, Past and Present. Macmillan & Co.. p. 255.
1081:
two days to back up his assertion that it is a reliable source. I have asked the editor to wash his own dishes by correcting the cite format. Waiting. •
1665:
373:
Second, did you read the comments (above) about the dead external links? They have already been discussed. Reading others' comments is often useful.
177:
93:
88:
97:
1736:
No, it is not. The JPG (which is of unknown origin) has more details to the coast line than the SVG (which is constructed from mapping data).
951:"The Formosan Language Archive: Linguistic Analysis and Language Processing. (PDF)". Computational Linguistics and Chinese Language Processing
40:
80:
1704:) of this chart is unsourced. We need to know whether that map is created from (or of) public domain material or sets of data (reference:
1705:
1712:
as a base map (NordNordWest is exemplary in making good-looking maps, which are compliant with policies and guidelines). There is also
484:
1694:
578:
181:
30:
17:
145:
2066:
2044:
2026:
2009:
1987:
1972:
1957:
1948:
1928:
1915:
1899:
1877:
1859:
1822:
1782:
1764:
1745:
1731:
1684:
1651:
1635:
1613:
1604:
1595:
1578:
1564:
1539:
1521:
1499:
1478:
1446:
1421:
1404:
1380:
1348:
1321:
1301:
1290:
1265:
1254:
1231:
1215:
1200:
1184:
1170:
1158:
1143:
1130:
1115:
1103:
1085:
1048:
997:
936:
885:
866:
839:
811:
790:
767:
732:
713:
672:
655:
634:
609:
585:
572:
540:
519:
499:
474:
454:
431:
407:
337:
326:
243:
233:
216:
199:
774:
922:"Shepherd, John Robert (1995). Marriage and Mandatory Abortion among the 17th Century Siraya." location and publisher please.
150:
1724:
1709:
753:
Gedenkwaarding bedriff der Nederlandsche Oost-Indische Maetschappye op de Kuste en in het keizerrijk van Taising of Sina
1713:
1609:
All issues resolved except for the image in the sidebar; waiting on the reviewer who !voted "Delist" to ... review. •
1056:
Double check publisher, appears to be published by the institute on its own authority as part of a monograph series (
1720:
1701:
1167:
1140:
1112:
863:
760:
591:
529:
266:
623:
84:
987:
Paper presented at the June, 1999 International Aboriginal Rights Conference in Taipei. Accessed March 24, 2007.
1149:
bibliographic catalogue. As such the article doesn't meet FA requirements at 2c, and in some minor ways 1c.
1557:
2005:
1628:
1373:
1341:
941:
The issue is about article titles, journal titles, consistency (the articles apparent standard is Article
351:
665:
269:
appears to have tagged with an inappropriate JPEG compression. The image needs to be a PNG or SVG format.
2040:
1517:
1417:
1164:
1137:
1109:
898:
There are a bunch of 2c issues which need fixing for consistency, given style, and academic correctness.
860:
783:- No author attributed at the source. What is the basis then for claiming s/he has been dead 70 years?
427:
229:
1226:
your suggestion. FAC rules, MOS rules, etc. state that articles can use any <adjective redacted: -->
1175:
This is why all commentary is given over a signature is it not? Please feel free to use my talk page.
979:"Taiwan Review". Website of Government Information Office, Republic of China. Accessed August 22, 2010.
958:
Italicised journal title, no quotes: Tsao, Feng-fu (1999). The Language Planning Situation in Taiwan.
1843:
949:
Italicised both article and journal title, quoted article title: Zeitoun, Elizabeth & Yu (2005).
443:
76:
64:
403:
tag will be removed and inserted again a couple times in the next couple years... But I fixed it. •
1911:
1895:
1873:
1865:
1778:
1760:
1741:
1442:
835:
807:
709:
698:
would resolve this issue. Alternatively, replace the current license with {{PD-old-70-1923|1877}}.
651:
605:
568:
515:
470:
2062:
2022:
1924:
Sorry, I'm in a busy stretch of the week. Will probably have time to look at these tomorrow... •
1495:
1250:
1211:
1180:
1154:
1126:
1099:
748:
358:
I fixed/removed the six or so troublesome redlinks. The appropriate response would be for you to
313:
173:
208:
1C issues? What does that mean? I don't think a better-researched document on this topic exists
285:
1998:
1943:
1835:
1818:
1809:
I took that photo of the poster. The title is "The great united family of peoples" (民族团结大家庭,
1620:
1464:
1365:
1333:
969:
Premier apologizes to Tao tribe. (2002, May 24). Taipei Times. Pg. 3. Accessed March 17, 2007.
169:
279:
2036:
1513:
1413:
692:
423:
382:
363:
262:
I am seeing a citation needed tag in the section "Plains, Mountains and Tribal definitions".
225:
53:
307:
212:
of Knowledge. Even among FAs, this one is more than normally well-cited. I am perplexed. •
1509:
1391:
as an nominator. Agreed, the article has no 1c issues. I seeing good improvements so far.
1360:
780:
626:- US does not consider PMA for published works; needs supplementary license for US status.
302:
1832:
It would be best to ask Jeremy Kemp to go back to the images he had uploaded and use the
1591:
OK, the article has now been rendered completely, ludicrously ugly. Someone ping ElC. •
1907:
1891:
1869:
1802:
This photograph would have unquestionably qualified for China's freedom of panorama if
1774:
1756:
1737:
1432:
1399:
1317:
1286:
932:
There shouldn't be quotes around the title of a journal. That is why there are none. •
825:
797:
722:
699:
682:
641:
595:
558:
505:
460:
322:
195:
661:
2058:
2018:
2017:
New tables; I think they are too large and unsourced. Any opinions from reviewers? •
1984:
1969:
1954:
1925:
1856:
1728:
1681:
1648:
1610:
1601:
1592:
1575:
1561:
1491:
1475:
1298:
1262:
1246:
1228:
1207:
1197:
1176:
1150:
1122:
1095:
1082:
1045:
994:
933:
787:
764:
729:
669:
631:
582:
537:
496:
451:
404:
397:
334:
333:
Fixed Formosan language archives links. They must have moved things very recently. •
240:
213:
1773:, which uses a compliant base map and has verifiable sources for the distribution.
1490:– This article should have been kept and removed from this review process long ago.
796:
possibly have been dead less than 70 years. Who is the author? When did s/he die?
1939:
1814:
1806:(应当指明作者姓名、作品名称). Who is the author and what is the (official) title of this work?
446:- No date or author in image summary or at source. How can we verify the license?
1295:
The refs are inline. By "inline refs" do you mean footnote style with <ref: -->
114:
1600:
An editor from Commons has deleted the photo I put in the sidebar. Try again. •
1532:
878:
821:
1964:
I have been working with Jappalang on the image issues; I appreciate his help.
1307:
1196:
remaining problems, wherever I see them. Thank you for you careful review. •
1459:
are PD. They were published before 1923 in another country (Japan). However,
1393:
1312:
1281:
318:
191:
1890:
Some of these should be easy to resolve to keep their use in the article.
347:
1020:
Consistency Newspaper Names not italicised, newspaper articles italicised.
777:- Summary only addresses status in Japan. What is copyright status in US?
1461:
this kind of metadata is not considered valuable enough to store anywhere
1647:
GA queue (selfish reasons), but passed it because it looks GA to me. .•
983:
Conference papers also flip around in style: Shih, Cheng-Feng (1999).
1163:
In your opinon, not mine. Please don't state your opinions as fact.
660:
This image as created by Paul (Pavel Ivanovich) Ibis (1852–77). See
459:
I haven't said it doesn't have a source. Please read critically.
1044:
That is the way it is spelled. I suppose they want to be cool. •
39:
Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at
1676:
a country of origin tag (either PD-Japan-oldphoto or PD-China).
1953:
Thanks for the comment and for your time. Problem resolved. •
1804:
the name of the author and the title of the work are mentioned
314:
http://formosan.sinica.edu.tw/formosan/en/archive_contents.htm
1771:
File:General distribution of indigenous people in Taiwan.svg
1560:, and welcoming it to Knowledge with a wide, warm smile. •
1306:
Yes, that is what I meant. But, okay okay okay, understood,
1065:
There's a whole bunch of spacing errors in the bibliography.
370:, not call FAR. And remember, redlinks are not always evil.
155:
2057:
by Jappalang has edit summary "images OK in my view". •
1706:
commons:Commons:Image casebook#Maps and satellite images
2054:
1431:: Several criterion three concerns remain outstanding.
110:
106:
102:
57:
532:- Needs a source for the underlying distribution data.
960:
Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development
130:
Featured article review/Taiwanese aborigines/archive1
915:Bibliography needs a check for terminal full-stops
2078:The above discussion is preserved as an archive.
985:Legal Status of the Indigenous Peoples of Taiwan.
1797:File:Beijing-NiuJie-Hani-Gaoshan-Ewenki-3656.jpg
1024:Correct spacing required, "Taipei:SMC Publishing
123:Featured article candidates/Taiwanese aborigines
1719:Close inspection suggests that the base map of
1618:asked Jappalang to come along as Elcob is AWOL
909:Similar problems with: Tsuchida, Shigeru (1983)
493:File:Femme Pepohan de Formose et son enfant.jpg
43:. No further edits should be made to this page.
2084:No further edits should be made to this page.
1015:What: "The sia-Pacific Journal: Japan Focus."
29:The following is an archived discussion of a
8:
1058:Negotiating Ethnicities in China and Taiwan
945:, except for some conference proceedings):
581:, which seems to have better provenance. •
295:I am also seeing dead links in the article:
134:
718:Thank you for the clarification. I added
316:- a dead link as with the external link.
1666:File:Tsou youth of Taiwan (pre-1945).jpg
1363:of concern are sourcing, copyright, MOS
487:- Needs a verifiable source per WP:IUP.
272:There are two red links in the article:
137:
127:
120:
824:for when and when not to use periods.
763:. Thanks for your time and trouble. •
41:Knowledge talk:Featured article review
7:
205:Fixing dead links is a trivial task.
2053:I think the images have been OK'd.
1036:Capitalisation? (ie: journal title
485:File:Taiwanese aborigines(1895).jpg
1727:, which you recommended we use. •
1310:, it was just a suggestion. :) --
590:The image is derived in part from
24:
1968:Absolutely nothing, it seems. •
1695:File:Formosan Distribution en.png
579:File:Formosan Distribution en.png
18:Knowledge:Featured article review
775:File:Plain Aborigines Taipei.jpg
1769:I have replaced this map with
1479:01:05, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
1447:15:24, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
1422:13:27, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
1405:04:36, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
1381:07:50, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
1349:07:50, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
1086:02:02, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
1:
1331:Moving down for a conclusion
1322:15:52, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
1302:17:10, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
1291:16:52, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
1266:05:06, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
1255:04:54, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
1232:04:40, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
1216:04:36, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
1201:04:27, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
1185:04:15, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
1171:03:57, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
1159:03:50, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
1144:03:37, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
1131:03:28, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
1116:03:17, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
1104:03:05, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
1049:23:52, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
1029:Page numbers (common error)?
998:02:16, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
937:23:58, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
917:(ie: Suenari, Michio (2006).)
759:Image removed, replaced with
751:- Needs a verifiable source (
491:Image removed, replaced with
2067:23:36, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
2045:20:19, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
2027:11:18, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
2010:14:17, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
1988:01:35, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
1973:00:55, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
1958:00:36, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
1949:17:27, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
1929:09:36, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
1916:02:57, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
1900:03:06, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
1878:02:56, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
1860:09:06, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
1823:16:29, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
1783:22:58, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
1765:12:56, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
1746:04:48, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
1732:09:05, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
1725:File:Taiwan location map.svg
1710:File:Taiwan location map.svg
1685:09:05, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
1652:01:39, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
1636:00:51, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
1245:is also about consistency.
668:for source info of image. •
549:. From what source did the
530:File:Taiwan aborigine en.jpg
344:redlinks are not always evil
267:File:Taiwan aborigine en.jpg
1714:File:Map of Taiwan 1901.jpg
1614:10:37, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
1605:23:11, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
1596:12:21, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
1579:12:12, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
1565:23:47, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
1540:14:06, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
1522:14:00, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
1500:11:55, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
975:Just woah Gao, Pat (2001).
886:14:38, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
867:16:34, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
840:15:41, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
812:00:23, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
791:23:07, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
768:01:42, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
733:01:48, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
714:15:20, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
673:03:01, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
656:00:23, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
635:22:49, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
610:15:20, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
586:08:31, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
573:00:23, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
541:22:46, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
520:15:20, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
500:03:28, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
475:00:23, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
455:22:44, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
440:regarding criterion three:
432:10:26, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
408:04:08, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
338:12:22, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
327:00:29, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
244:08:00, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
234:06:35, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
217:05:40, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
200:05:33, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
2101:
1855:I'll see what I can do. •
1755:or page number is given.
1721:File:Tw-administration.jpg
1702:File:Tw-administration.jpg
1361:Featured article criterion
761:File:Xingang Writing 2.jpg
592:File:Tw-administration.jpg
1510:featured article criteria
624:File:PepoWomanChild S.jpg
178:WikiProject Ethnic groups
2081:Please do not modify it.
1840:template on them (using
1811:Minzu tuanjie da jiating
56:04:12, 13 November 2010
36:Please do not modify it.
728:as per your request. •
545:This is a map of tribe
495:. PMA data provided. •
255:Regarding these issues:
31:featured article review
1708:). I recommend using
901:Richard Wilson (1970)
352:Tongji (spirit medium)
977:Minority, Not Minor.
857:Taiwanese aborigines
577:Image replaced with
444:File:Rukai chief.jpg
77:Taiwanese aborigines
65:Taiwanese aborigines
1866:File:Taiwan nun.jpg
1716:available for use.
309:- also a dead link.
239:2009 (was 2006). •
749:File:Formosans.jpg
557:) the image come?
182:WikiProject Taiwan
1403:
755:is not a source).
288:- also redlinked.
185:
163:
162:
71:Review commentary
2092:
2083:
2002:
1946:
1847:
1839:
1631:
1623:
1558:WP:Systemic bias
1536:
1439:
1397:
1376:
1368:
1344:
1336:
920:Not acceptable,
882:
832:
804:
727:
721:
706:
697:
691:
687:
681:
648:
602:
565:
553:used to create (
512:
467:
402:
396:
387:
381:
368:
362:
166:
135:
118:
100:
48:The article was
38:
2100:
2099:
2095:
2094:
2093:
2091:
2090:
2089:
2088:
2079:
2000:
1944:
1841:
1833:
1629:
1621:
1534:
1445:
1433:
1374:
1366:
1356:
1354:FARC commentary
1342:
1334:
1243:Newspaper title
1239:Containing work
880:
838:
826:
810:
798:
781:File:Atayal.jpg
725:
719:
712:
700:
695:
689:
685:
679:
654:
642:
608:
596:
571:
559:
518:
506:
473:
461:
400:
394:
385:
379:
366:
360:
91:
75:
73:
68:
34:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
2098:
2096:
2087:
2086:
2074:
2073:
2072:
2071:
2070:
2069:
2048:
2047:
2030:
2029:
2015:
2012:
1991:
1990:
1981:
1980:
1979:
1978:
1977:
1976:
1975:
1965:
1933:
1932:
1931:
1919:
1918:
1906:Images okay.
1887:
1886:
1885:
1884:
1883:
1882:
1881:
1880:
1829:
1828:
1827:
1826:
1825:
1793:
1792:
1791:
1790:
1789:
1788:
1787:
1786:
1785:
1748:
1700:The base map (
1691:
1690:
1689:
1688:
1687:
1658:Image comments
1655:
1654:
1644:
1643:
1642:
1641:
1640:
1639:
1638:
1630:new photo poll
1588:
1587:
1586:
1585:
1584:
1583:
1582:
1581:
1568:
1543:
1542:
1525:
1524:
1503:
1502:
1484:
1483:
1482:
1481:
1450:
1449:
1441:
1425:
1424:
1407:
1385:
1384:
1375:new photo poll
1355:
1352:
1343:new photo poll
1329:
1328:
1327:
1326:
1325:
1324:
1274:
1273:
1272:
1271:
1270:
1269:
1268:
1259:
1258:
1257:
1241:or "Articles"
1220:
1219:
1218:
1193:
1192:
1191:
1190:
1189:
1188:
1187:
1092:
1091:
1090:
1089:
1088:
1072:
1070:dissertation."
1066:
1063:
1053:
1052:
1051:
1033:
1027:
1021:
1018:
1009:
1008:
1007:
1006:
1005:
1004:
1003:
1002:
1001:
1000:
989:
988:
981:
972:
964:
962:20.4,5:328–48.
955:
924:
918:
912:
906:
899:
889:
888:
870:
869:
845:
844:
843:
842:
834:
818:
817:
816:
815:
814:
806:
778:
772:
771:
770:
745:
744:
743:
742:
741:
740:
739:
738:
737:
736:
735:
708:
650:
620:
619:
618:
617:
616:
615:
614:
613:
612:
604:
567:
526:
525:
524:
523:
522:
514:
481:
480:
479:
478:
477:
469:
417:
416:
415:
414:
413:
412:
411:
410:
390:
374:
371:
330:
329:
310:
305:
297:
296:
292:
291:
290:
289:
283:
274:
273:
270:
263:
257:
256:
249:
248:
247:
246:
220:
219:
206:
187:
186:
161:
160:
159:
158:
156:External links
153:
148:
140:
139:
133:
132:
126:
125:
72:
69:
67:
62:
61:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2097:
2085:
2082:
2076:
2075:
2068:
2064:
2060:
2056:
2052:
2051:
2050:
2049:
2046:
2042:
2038:
2034:
2033:
2032:
2031:
2028:
2024:
2020:
2016:
2013:
2011:
2007:
2003:
1996:
1993:
1992:
1989:
1986:
1982:
1974:
1971:
1966:
1963:
1962:
1961:
1960:
1959:
1956:
1952:
1951:
1950:
1947:
1941:
1937:
1934:
1930:
1927:
1923:
1922:
1921:
1920:
1917:
1913:
1909:
1905:
1904:
1903:
1902:
1901:
1897:
1893:
1879:
1875:
1871:
1867:
1863:
1862:
1861:
1858:
1854:
1853:
1852:
1851:
1850:
1845:
1837:
1830:
1824:
1820:
1816:
1812:
1808:
1807:
1805:
1801:
1800:
1799:
1798:
1794:
1784:
1780:
1776:
1772:
1768:
1767:
1766:
1762:
1758:
1754:
1753:article name,
1749:
1747:
1743:
1739:
1735:
1734:
1733:
1730:
1726:
1722:
1718:
1717:
1715:
1711:
1707:
1703:
1699:
1698:
1697:
1696:
1692:
1686:
1683:
1678:
1677:
1675:
1670:
1669:
1668:
1667:
1663:
1662:
1661:
1659:
1653:
1650:
1645:
1637:
1633:
1632:
1625:
1624:
1617:
1616:
1615:
1612:
1608:
1607:
1606:
1603:
1599:
1598:
1597:
1594:
1590:
1589:
1580:
1577:
1573:
1569:
1567:
1566:
1563:
1559:
1554:
1553:
1547:
1546:
1545:
1544:
1541:
1538:
1529:
1528:
1527:
1526:
1523:
1519:
1515:
1511:
1507:
1506:
1505:
1504:
1501:
1497:
1493:
1489:
1486:
1485:
1480:
1477:
1472:
1471:
1466:
1462:
1457:
1454:
1453:
1452:
1451:
1448:
1444:
1440:
1438:
1437:
1430:
1427:
1426:
1423:
1419:
1415:
1411:
1408:
1406:
1401:
1396:
1395:
1390:
1387:
1386:
1383:
1382:
1377:
1372:
1370:
1369:
1362:
1358:
1357:
1353:
1351:
1350:
1346:
1345:
1338:
1337:
1323:
1319:
1315:
1314:
1309:
1305:
1304:
1303:
1300:
1294:
1293:
1292:
1288:
1284:
1283:
1278:
1275:
1267:
1264:
1260:
1256:
1252:
1248:
1244:
1240:
1235:
1234:
1233:
1230:
1225:
1221:
1217:
1213:
1209:
1204:
1203:
1202:
1199:
1194:
1186:
1182:
1178:
1174:
1173:
1172:
1169:
1166:
1162:
1161:
1160:
1156:
1152:
1147:
1146:
1145:
1142:
1139:
1134:
1133:
1132:
1128:
1124:
1119:
1118:
1117:
1114:
1111:
1107:
1106:
1105:
1101:
1097:
1093:
1087:
1084:
1080:
1076:
1075:
1073:
1071:
1067:
1064:
1061:
1059:
1054:
1050:
1047:
1043:
1042:
1041:
1039:
1034:
1032:
1028:
1025:
1022:
1019:
1016:
1013:
1012:
1011:
1010:
999:
996:
991:
990:
986:
982:
980:
978:
973:
971:
970:
965:
963:
961:
956:
954:
953:10.2:167–200.
952:
947:
946:
944:
943:Journal Title
940:
939:
938:
935:
931:
930:
929:
928:4.1:307–319.)
925:
923:
919:
916:
913:
910:
907:
905:
900:
897:
896:
894:
891:
890:
887:
884:
875:
872:
871:
868:
865:
862:
858:
854:
850:
847:
846:
841:
837:
833:
831:
830:
823:
819:
813:
809:
805:
803:
802:
794:
793:
792:
789:
785:
784:
782:
779:
776:
773:
769:
766:
762:
758:
757:
756:
754:
750:
746:
734:
731:
724:
717:
716:
715:
711:
707:
705:
704:
694:
684:
676:
675:
674:
671:
667:
664:for bio; see
663:
659:
658:
657:
653:
649:
647:
646:
638:
637:
636:
633:
629:
628:
627:
625:
621:
611:
607:
603:
601:
600:
593:
589:
588:
587:
584:
580:
576:
575:
574:
570:
566:
564:
563:
556:
552:
548:
544:
543:
542:
539:
535:
534:
533:
531:
527:
521:
517:
513:
511:
510:
503:
502:
501:
498:
494:
490:
489:
488:
486:
482:
476:
472:
468:
466:
465:
458:
457:
456:
453:
448:
447:
445:
442:
441:
439:
436:
435:
434:
433:
429:
425:
421:
409:
406:
399:
391:
388:
384:
375:
372:
369:
365:
357:
353:
349:
345:
341:
340:
339:
336:
332:
331:
328:
324:
320:
317:
315:
311:
308:
306:
303:
301:
300:
299:
298:
294:
293:
287:
284:
281:
278:
277:
276:
275:
271:
268:
264:
261:
260:
259:
258:
254:
251:
250:
245:
242:
237:
236:
235:
231:
227:
222:
221:
218:
215:
211:
207:
204:
203:
202:
201:
197:
193:
184:
183:
179:
175:
171:
165:
164:
157:
154:
152:
149:
147:
144:
143:
142:
141:
136:
131:
128:
124:
121:
119:
116:
112:
108:
104:
99:
95:
90:
86:
82:
78:
70:
66:
63:
60:
58:
55:
51:
44:
42:
37:
32:
27:
26:
19:
2080:
2077:
1994:
1935:
1889:
1888:
1831:
1810:
1803:
1795:
1752:
1693:
1673:
1664:
1657:
1656:
1627:
1622:YellowMonkey
1619:
1570:
1551:
1550:
1548:
1487:
1469:
1468:
1460:
1455:
1435:
1434:
1428:
1409:
1392:
1388:
1378:
1367:YellowMonkey
1364:
1359:
1340:
1335:YellowMonkey
1332:
1330:
1311:
1296:</rf: -->
1280:
1276:
1242:
1238:
1223:
1078:
1068:
1057:
1055:
1037:
1035:
1030:
1023:
1014:
984:
976:
974:
968:
966:
959:
957:
950:
948:
942:
926:
921:
914:
908:
902:
892:
873:
856:
852:
848:
828:
827:
800:
799:
752:
747:
702:
701:
644:
643:
622:
598:
597:
561:
560:
554:
550:
547:distribution
546:
528:
508:
507:
483:
463:
462:
437:
419:
418:
378:
359:
355:
343:
312:
304:- dead link.
282:- redlinked.
252:
209:
188:
167:
151:Citation bot
74:
49:
47:
35:
28:
2037:Dana boomer
1844:Information
1723:is in fact
1514:Dana boomer
1465:Torii Ryūzō
1414:Dana boomer
1108:So fix it.
853:Headhunting
822:MOS:CAPTION
424:Dana boomer
265:This image
226:Taiwantaffy
54:Dana boomer
1308:no worries
967:Just woah
555:underlying
504:Resolved.
168:Notified:
2055:This edit
1908:Jappalang
1892:Jappalang
1870:Jappalang
1864:Based on
1775:Jappalang
1757:Jappalang
1738:Jappalang
1436:Эlcobbola
1038:positions
829:Эlcobbola
801:Эlcobbola
703:Эlcobbola
645:Эlcobbola
599:Эlcobbola
562:Эlcobbola
509:Эlcobbola
464:Эlcobbola
286:Trobiawan
2059:Ling.Nut
2019:Ling.Nut
1985:Ling.Nut
1970:Ling.Nut
1955:Ling.Nut
1926:Ling.Nut
1857:Ling.Nut
1836:own work
1729:Ling.Nut
1682:Ling.Nut
1649:Ling.Nut
1611:Ling.Nut
1602:Ling.Nut
1593:Ling.Nut
1576:Ling.Nut
1562:Ling.Nut
1552:Japanese
1533:·Maunus·
1492:Lambanog
1476:Ling.Nut
1299:Ling.Nut
1263:Ling.Nut
1247:Fifelfoo
1229:Ling.Nut
1208:Fifelfoo
1198:Ling.Nut
1177:Fifelfoo
1168:Fatuorum
1151:Fifelfoo
1141:Fatuorum
1123:Fifelfoo
1113:Fatuorum
1096:Fifelfoo
1083:Ling.Nut
1079:one week
1046:Ling.Nut
995:Ling.Nut
934:Ling.Nut
893:Comments
879:·Maunus·
874:Comments
864:Fatuorum
849:Comments
788:Ling.Nut
765:Ling.Nut
730:Ling.Nut
670:Ling.Nut
632:Ling.Nut
583:Ling.Nut
538:Ling.Nut
497:Ling.Nut
452:Ling.Nut
438:Comments
405:Ling.Nut
335:Ling.Nut
241:Ling.Nut
214:Ling.Nut
174:Ling.Nut
146:Analysis
2001:Georgia
1936:Comment
1815:Vmenkov
1456:Comment
1410:Comment
1277:Comment
1224:Decline
1165:Malleus
1138:Malleus
1110:Malleus
877:clear).
861:Malleus
693:PD-1923
420:Comment
383:sofixit
364:sofixit
342:First,
280:Luilang
253:Comment
210:outside
170:Maowang
138:Toolbox
94:protect
89:history
1940:Ruslik
1429:Delist
993:APA.•
356:before
348:Corvée
98:delete
1999:Sandy
1470:might
723:PD-US
683:PD-US
115:views
107:watch
103:links
16:<
2063:talk
2041:talk
2023:talk
2006:Talk
1995:Note
1945:Zero
1912:talk
1896:talk
1874:talk
1849:tag.
1819:talk
1779:talk
1761:talk
1742:talk
1518:talk
1496:talk
1488:Keep
1443:talk
1418:talk
1400:Talk
1394:JJ98
1389:Keep
1318:talk
1313:Cirt
1287:talk
1282:Cirt
1251:talk
1212:talk
1181:talk
1155:talk
1127:talk
1100:talk
836:talk
820:See
808:talk
710:talk
666:here
662:here
652:talk
606:talk
569:talk
551:data
516:talk
471:talk
428:talk
398:fact
350:and
323:talk
319:JJ98
230:talk
196:talk
192:JJ98
111:logs
85:talk
81:edit
50:kept
1674:and
1634:)
1572:PD.
1379:)
1347:)
688:or
52:by
2065:)
2043:)
2025:)
2008:)
1914:)
1898:)
1876:)
1846:}}
1842:{{
1838:}}
1834:{{
1821:)
1781:)
1763:)
1744:)
1574:•
1520:)
1498:)
1474:•
1420:)
1320:)
1289:)
1253:)
1214:)
1183:)
1157:)
1129:)
1102:)
1026:."
895::
726:}}
720:{{
696:}}
690:{{
686:}}
680:{{
450:•
430:)
401:}}
395:{{
386:}}
380:{{
367:}}
361:{{
325:)
232:)
198:)
180:,
176:,
172:,
113:|
109:|
105:|
101:|
96:|
92:|
87:|
83:|
59:.
33:.
2061:(
2039:(
2021:(
2004:(
1942:_
1910:(
1894:(
1872:(
1817:(
1777:(
1759:(
1740:(
1626:(
1537:·
1535:ƛ
1516:(
1494:(
1416:(
1402:)
1398:(
1371:(
1339:(
1316:(
1285:(
1249:(
1210:(
1179:(
1153:(
1125:(
1098:(
1094:"
1062:.
1060:)
1040:)
1017:?
911:.
883:·
881:ƛ
426:(
389:.
321:(
228:(
194:(
117:)
79:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.