210:. I agree that this is a very tricky topic to write a FA on, and agree that cherrypicking and accuracy are major concerns. That said... just as a general principle for when covering fringe, disliked groups... there's something to be said for having a section that presents their beliefs standing on their own and as they see things. Doesn't apply to just VHEM, but also, like, some new form of astrology or superseded scientific theories or the like. Basically I'm saying that having something like an "Ideology" section isn't strictly a bad idea, even if secondary sources are dismissive of it. To use the example of superseded scientific theories - it's okay to have a section that's "Okay, here's how they thought it worked", and then another section with "And here's why almost nobody buys it anymore." (But all the other problems are pretty big and certainly worth a FAR.)
177:
Scope problems. The only (extremely outdated) estimates in the article for "how many people are actually associated with VHEMT" are a couple hundred people. The movement is (and is backed up by both included sources and more up-to-date ones) essentially a nom de guerre for Knight. This is shoved into
158:
Significant coverage concerns. The "Ideology" section makes up a substantial proportion of the article (~700 words to a ~250 word lead and ~1000 word remainder across three sections), making the largest part of the article by weight an uncritical and uncontextualized summary of the group's positions.
149:
Yeah, I don't think this is really fixable within the FAR context; it's a very marginal group that mostly gets "look at this guy saying X" coverage, which is difficult to spin into a comprehensive article without playing word games with "comprehensive". The whole talk history is an
171:
Significant tone concerns. This mostly ties in and overlaps with the previous section -- the cherrypicking is particularly egregious -- but several examples stand out as especially tone-related, like the footnotes (A and B in particular) and the huge quotebox girding
178:
the "Organization and promotion" section and quickly moved away from in favour of a self-promotional statement of "millions of people" -- Knight's guesstimate for "how many people are childfree"? The article tries
166:
positive quotes from articles that in some cases (like the former) barely discuss the subject, and "rebuts" criticisms with quotes from the movement's founder.
112:
359:
320:
301:
284:
264:
242:
219:
198:
143:
108:
88:
38:
70:
329:
104:
30:
17:
340:
100:
193:
159:"Reception" is structured as to lump virtually all incorporated negative coverage in a single paragraph, pulls
160:
188:
129:
80:
355:
260:
84:
315:
297:
275:
no edits since August, concerns about sourcing remain, and I would add a concern about currency.
237:
215:
138:
92:
59:
351:
280:
256:
51:
182:
to present a mailing list as a mass movement, but it's disrupted by the actual numbers.
310:
293:
232:
211:
163:
133:
96:
347:
55:
276:
336:, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please leave the
154:
read. I'll quote my bulletpoints from there for an idea of the scope:
255:
Issues raised in the review section include sourcing and neutrality.
132:, this 2012 promotion suffers from tone, POV, and sourcing issues.
37:
Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at
115:
63:
292:. Not being worked on, tone and neutrality issues.
367:The above discussion is preserved as an archive.
41:. No further edits should be made to this page.
373:No further edits should be made to this page.
346:template in place on the talk page until the
29:The following is an archived discussion of a
8:
231:, larger sourcing issues unaddressed.
39:Knowledge talk:Featured article review
7:
71:Voluntary Human Extinction Movement
24:
18:Knowledge:Featured article review
62:) 4:31, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
360:04:31, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
321:03:09, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
302:00:44, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
285:02:02, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
1:
265:02:11, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
243:01:55, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
220:18:26, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
199:03:36, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
144:03:30, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
390:
370:Please do not modify it.
35:Please do not modify it.
341:featured article review
31:featured article review
116:noticed on 2023-07-19
113:WP Alternative views
89:Philologia SƦculÄrÄs
330:removal candidate
119:
381:
372:
345:
339:
183:
173:
167:
130:Vaticidalprophet
109:WP Organizations
77:
46:The article was
36:
389:
388:
384:
383:
382:
380:
379:
378:
377:
368:
343:
337:
319:
251:
241:
176:
170:
157:
142:
126:
74:
34:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
387:
385:
376:
375:
363:
362:
350:goes through.
323:
313:
304:
287:
269:
268:
250:
247:
246:
245:
235:
225:
224:
223:
222:
202:
201:
186:
185:
184:
174:
168:
136:
125:
124:Review section
122:
121:
120:
73:
68:
67:
44:
43:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
386:
374:
371:
365:
364:
361:
357:
353:
349:
342:
335:
331:
327:
324:
322:
318:
317:
312:
308:
305:
303:
299:
295:
291:
288:
286:
282:
278:
274:
271:
270:
267:
266:
262:
258:
253:
252:
248:
244:
240:
239:
234:
230:
227:
226:
221:
217:
213:
209:
206:
205:
204:
203:
200:
197:
196:
192:
191:
187:
181:
175:
169:
165:
162:
156:
155:
153:
148:
147:
146:
145:
141:
140:
135:
131:
123:
118:
117:
114:
110:
106:
102:
98:
94:
90:
86:
82:
76:
75:
72:
69:
66:
64:
61:
57:
53:
49:
42:
40:
32:
27:
26:
19:
369:
366:
333:
326:Closing note
325:
314:
306:
289:
272:
254:
249:FARC section
236:
229:Move to FARC
228:
207:
194:
189:
179:
164:cherrypicked
151:
137:
128:As noted by
127:
78:
47:
45:
28:
309:per above.
172:"Ideology".
81:Mark Arsten
352:Nikkimaria
257:Nikkimaria
161:incredibly
152:insightful
85:Mitch Ames
79:Notified:
52:Nikkimaria
332:has been
190:Vaticidal
180:very hard
105:WP Oregon
334:delisted
328:: This
311:Hog Farm
294:SnowFire
233:Hog Farm
212:SnowFire
134:Hog Farm
101:WP Death
93:Skyeking
48:delisted
208:Comment
195:prophet
307:Delist
290:Delist
273:Delist
56:FACBot
277:Z1720
16:<
356:talk
316:Talk
298:talk
281:talk
261:talk
238:Talk
216:talk
139:Talk
60:talk
54:via
348:bot
97:Bri
50:by
358:)
344:}}
338:{{
300:)
283:)
263:)
218:)
111:,
107:,
103:,
99:,
95:,
91:,
87:,
83:,
65:.
33:.
354:(
296:(
279:(
259:(
214:(
58:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.