152:
way", with Davies, Chlebowski and all the stuff I have on my bookshelf. BTW, it could be a good moment to incorporate all the splinters back into the main article. After all the 30kb limit is no longer observed and I believe the idea to divide the article prior to FA nomination was a bad choice. The
440:
I find it slightly slanted to reporting from the Polish perspective. The German perspective isn't bad but lacks depth and coverage from the Soviet perspective is superficial. There is some repetition, but I think this is probably as a result of the rewrite, so could be cleaned up (and is listed on
101:
This article was awarded FA status in late 2004, but I don't think it satisfies current standards. The important Life behind the front lines and
Casualties subsections are stubs, implying it's not as comprehensive as it should be. There are not enough inline citations, and some facts have been
205:
Update. Major work on rewriting the article has begun. Feel free to comment here on current inadequacies, in addition to rewriting and restructuring the article we are well aware of lack of inline citations and will try to provide them in the coming days. Help of native copyeditor would be
120:
but I will admit WU is older and in worse shape than HoP45-89 was. Any help other editors can offer would be appreciated (I asked on Polish and MilHist noticeboards few weeks ago for it but none volunteered...). In its current state its certainly
79:
117:
455:
I'm going to call this a default keep. I believe this review, at about 10 weeks, has set a record. There's been significant work since the removes were noted and I trust
Piotrus and others will keep at it. I'll leave a note on talk.
83:
102:
flagged as needing citation. One editor has suggested on the talk page that the article has a pro-Polish nationalist slant. A script posting there also listed a number of inconsistencies with
71:
87:
75:
398:
I am working on it but I am alone. Since without a native speaker we cannot do a good copyedit, I am afraid the project will not move forward enough :( --
148:
I'm on short vacations right now (Kraków and Żywiec), but I'll be back in a week or so. Next monday I could start sourcing and rewriting the article the "
474:
40:
367:
If they make an attempt to improve the article, can you message me on my talk page to return to this review and reassess my vote? Thanks
Marskell.
441:
the "To do" list). At the moment I'd say remove, but I don't see any urgency to close it as
Piotrus still seems to be slowly working on it.
30:
17:
429:
380:
It's been five weeks, and work seems stalled. Unless someone lets us know soon that work is progressing, I'll be a Remove.
460:
449:
433:
412:
392:
371:
359:
349:
337:
316:
303:
285:
272:
250:
220:
199:
184:
165:
153:
past 2 years of this article's history prove that the splinter sub-articles are barely ever read and receive no attention.
139:
110:
95:
195:
I don't think there's any hurry. I am sure we can keep this review open for a while while people work on revision.
170:
Glad to hear you'd be helping, now I am confident we can do it. And yes, splinters are bad, 9 times out of 10.--
388:
238:
tags as possible. Really, that helps a lot in sourcing articles as for me some things seem too obvious.
258:
Update: article has been expanded and is more comprehensive, we are working on style and citations.--
447:
423:
368:
346:
247:
162:
92:
116:
The article is on my 'to update' list. I will try to improve the article in the same way I did
405:
381:
265:
213:
177:
132:
149:
103:
57:
442:
334:
457:
419:
356:
313:
300:
244:
232:
159:
418:
Given I had ancestors die in the uprising I'll have a look if i have time. cheers,
401:
326:
261:
209:
173:
128:
355:
We can wait a couple more days for
Halibutt and Piotrus. I left notes for both.
196:
107:
298:
Suggested FA criteria concerns are comprehensiveness (1b) and citations (1c).
330:
282:
312:: how do people feel? I notice work has stopped but it remains tagged.
228:
Piotrus beat me to it, so I'll only add that we'd appreciate as many
473:
Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in
39:
Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at
329:
will re-nominate after improving it, as he did with
467:The above discussion is preserved as an archive.
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
477:. No further edits should be made to this page.
125:, but please check back in two weeks or so.--
29:The following is an archived discussion of a
8:
475:Knowledge (XXG) talk:Featured article review
41:Knowledge (XXG) talk:Featured article review
72:Poland-related Knowledge (XXG) notice board
70:Original author aware. Messages left at
18:Knowledge (XXG):Featured article review
402:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus
262:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus
210:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus
174:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus
129:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus
345:per 1c. I echo DrKiernan's comments.
7:
80:Polish military history task force
24:
281:. Article does meet criteria. -
325:in its current state. Perhaps
1:
494:
200:13:01, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
185:18:29, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
166:10:36, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
140:06:43, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
111:05:43, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
96:15:35, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
450:00:47, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
434:05:49, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
413:01:30, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
393:01:45, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
470:Please do not modify it.
461:07:57, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
372:22:41, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
360:19:48, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
350:18:18, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
338:12:45, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
317:08:28, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
304:03:52, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
286:15:37, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
273:03:59, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
36:Please do not modify it.
251:19:54, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
221:18:32, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
84:World War II task force
31:featured article review
52:07:59, 8 July 2007.
88:History of Poland
64:Review commentary
485:
472:
445:
410:
408:
385:
270:
268:
242:
237:
231:
218:
216:
182:
180:
157:
150:Mauthausen-Gusen
137:
135:
76:Military history
48:The article was
38:
493:
492:
488:
487:
486:
484:
483:
482:
481:
468:
443:
411:
406:
400:
383:
294:
292:FARC commentary
271:
266:
260:
240:
235:
229:
219:
214:
208:
183:
178:
172:
155:
138:
133:
127:
66:
61:
58:Warsaw Uprising
34:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
491:
489:
480:
479:
453:
452:
437:
436:
399:
396:
395:
377:
376:
375:
374:
353:
352:
340:
307:
306:
293:
290:
289:
288:
259:
256:
255:
254:
253:
207:
206:appreciated.--
203:
202:
192:
191:
190:
189:
188:
187:
171:
143:
142:
126:
99:
98:
65:
62:
60:
55:
54:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
490:
478:
476:
471:
465:
464:
463:
462:
459:
451:
448:
446:
439:
438:
435:
431:
428:
425:
421:
417:
416:
415:
414:
409:
403:
394:
390:
386:
379:
378:
373:
370:
369:LuciferMorgan
366:
365:
364:
363:
362:
361:
358:
351:
348:
347:LuciferMorgan
344:
341:
339:
336:
332:
328:
324:
321:
320:
319:
318:
315:
311:
305:
302:
299:
296:
295:
291:
287:
284:
280:
277:
276:
275:
274:
269:
263:
252:
249:
246:
243:
234:
227:
226:
225:
224:
223:
222:
217:
211:
201:
198:
194:
193:
186:
181:
175:
169:
168:
167:
164:
161:
158:
151:
147:
146:
145:
144:
141:
136:
130:
124:
119:
115:
114:
113:
112:
109:
105:
97:
94:
93:LuciferMorgan
91:
89:
85:
81:
77:
73:
68:
67:
63:
59:
56:
53:
51:
44:
42:
37:
32:
27:
26:
19:
469:
466:
454:
426:
397:
354:
342:
327:User:Piotrus
322:
309:
308:
297:
278:
257:
239:
204:
154:
122:
100:
69:
49:
47:
35:
28:
444:Yomangani
335:DrKiernan
331:Max Weber
458:Marskell
430:contribs
420:Casliber
357:Marskell
314:Marskell
301:Marskell
118:this FAR
384:Georgia
343:Remove
323:Remove
310:Status
245:Halibu
160:Halibu
123:remove
104:WP:MoS
407:talk
382:Sandy
267:talk
215:talk
197:nadav
179:talk
134:talk
108:nadav
16:<
424:talk
389:Talk
283:Vald
279:Keep
233:fact
86:and
50:kept
432:)
391:)
333:?
248:tt
241://
236:}}
230:{{
163:tt
156://
106:.
82:,
78:,
74:,
33:.
427:·
422:(
404:|
387:(
264:|
212:|
176:|
131:|
90:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.