53:
The article is unbalanced, the "Criticism and
Controversy" section is the largest single section of the article and is topped off with a "Weasel words" tag. I know there are counterarguments to the critics in that section like mentioning the article in Nature magazine, but I still feel the article
70:
This is an encyclopedia article about
Knowledge (XXG), what would a reader care about how some Wikipedian's perceive Knowledge (XXG)? Some Wikipedians are probably perceive it to be a Time Cube.
57:
Smaller points include the tiny "funding" section, it's so minimal and mentions nothing of how the
Wikimedia Foundation and Knowledge (XXG) is funded, I'm not sure why it's there.
65:
Some of
Knowledge (XXG)'s editors have explained its editing process as a "socially Darwinian evolutionary process", but this description is not accepted by most Wikipedians.
21:
60:
There are a handful of "citation needed" tags in the article, surely for a featured article, this should not be the case. An example of one of these reads:
102:
Ten days have passed, edit history shows numerous reverts, talk page shows no ongoing effort to improve the article, and there are numerous citation tags.
40:
92:
Two sections: "Scientific analyses of
Knowledge (XXG)" and "In popular culture" are very short, they should be either expanded or removed.
17:
54:
is unbalanced. I'm not too sure how much of it is criticism either, the subsection "Authors" barely deals with any criticism.
176:
164:
152:
140:
124:
106:
96:
87:
73:
In general, this article does not represent the best of
Knowledge (XXG) and is not of featured article standard. -
93:
135:
138:
103:
121:
84:
74:
149:
31:
173:
119:
Main FA criteria concerns are neutrality (2d) and comprehesiveness (2b).
161:
172:
as above. And I don't like the navel-gazing, self-referential aspect.
77:
8:
160:as above - lack of references and more....
18:Knowledge (XXG):Featured article review
7:
78:
28:
1:
41:no longer a featured article
193:
177:06:41, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
165:07:55, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
153:05:44, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
141:19:50, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
125:12:04, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
107:02:25, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
88:03:19, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
97:11:00, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
134:unlikely to be fixed
49:Review commentary
184:
82:
81:
192:
191:
187:
186:
185:
183:
182:
181:
115:
113:FARC commentary
79:
51:
35:
32:Knowledge (XXG)
26:
25:
24:
22:Knowledge (XXG)
12:
11:
5:
190:
188:
180:
179:
167:
155:
143:
128:
127:
114:
111:
110:
109:
68:
67:
50:
47:
46:
45:
34:
29:
27:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
189:
178:
175:
171:
168:
166:
163:
159:
156:
154:
151:
148:per Jaranda.
147:
144:
142:
139:
137:
133:
130:
129:
126:
123:
120:
117:
116:
112:
108:
105:
101:
100:
99:
98:
95:
90:
89:
86:
83:
76:
71:
66:
63:
62:
61:
58:
55:
48:
44:
42:
37:
36:
33:
30:
23:
19:
169:
157:
145:
131:
118:
91:
72:
69:
64:
59:
56:
52:
38:
39:Article is
122:Marskell
20: |
150:Rebecca
136:Jaranda
170:Remove
158:Remove
146:Remove
132:Remove
75:Hahnch
104:Sandy
16:<
174:Tony
162:RN
94:CG
85:n
80:e
43:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.