702:"With total 392 entries submitted for the three award sections; Feature Films, Non-Feature Films and Best Writing on Cinema; eight different committees consisting of 41 jury members were instituted in order to judge the various entries.". The use of semi-colon is probably not very usual. Two unspaced emdahses can be used instead. "In order to"-- discouraged by good copyeditors, just "to" is fine. Indeed the whole sentence structure can be changed here: Eight different committees consisting of 41 jury members were instituted to judge 392 entries in 3 award sections—Feature Films, Non-Feature Films and Best Writing on Cinema.
2497:"For its witty, satirical and penetrative account of the politics involved in the commercialization of religion in India. Through a wonderfully authentic depiction of village life, mentality and gesture, Deool has a social, religious and commercial sweep, even as it individualizes each of its characters and endows them with a language and space of their own. The film ironically shows the wholehearted acceptance of commodified and clamorous religiosity in a land plagued by all the serious problems the country faces today, and it does so with laughter that is only slightly tinged with cynicism."
3063:@TRM: I appreciate your comments and time but then you keep using the terms like "certain standard", "decent PR", "poor quality" etc. How do we know any of "these" till somebody points out the mistakes? I had requested multiple reviewers who were involved in earlier FLCs, including you, but there was no reply even on the talk page to inform about their unavailability. And that's perfectly fine as it may not interest everyone to review. We are OK with copy-editing and other approaches as long as it results in something. -
2782:
2802:
2792:
2574:
said above, I reviewed the lead, it had multiple issues. I reviewed the next section, it had multiple issues. FLC is not a peer review mechanism. I'm not going to produce hundreds more comments about the basics of
English grammar which should have been resolved before this nomination was initiated.
2645:
There is no such rule that FLC's shouldn't have too many comments and that peer reviews should be opened once someone feels that there are problems with the prose. Contrarily, it is mandated that an oppose has to come with reason, be it any number of comments. All your issues have been addressed till
909:
i had said; "As to being an article or a list i couldn't find any previous discussions related to awards. There have been similar discussions somewhere for List-of-episodes with no definite conclusion. But still majority of such pages are under lists. I could not find any year-wise award related page
3048:
here, so waiting for a decent PR is perfectly fine. I'm afraid I can't respond to all requests to review articles, I do my fair share, but when an article of this poor quality is nominated, I have to strenuously object to it until it's better prepared. So I suggest you withdraw this very premature
3009:
Well as part of my role as FL director I try to review every list and will do my best to prevent substandard lists from passing. This is one such list. And yes, there was a PR but it was a very poor showing, it barely had half a dozen comments. Compare that the number of comments here. This list
2664:
There is a level of expectation that the prose is written in grammatically correct
English. I do not have to give any more comments, but I took the liberty of just picking the odd sentence from the various sections to give you an overview of how many issues exist in the article. Please don't just
2573:
These kind of floral tribute citations are entirely unnecessary. And what is the copyright status of the document you 100% copied and pasted? I suggest (as I did above) you get a view from someone who is much more experienced in this area than us. As for elaborating the copyedit issue, well, as I
2554:
Are you suggesting that the citations be removed? The point of the citations is to provide critical commentary, and there have been no explanations as to why it is of "no benefit to this encyclopedia" other than the one that they are long, and hence all their usefulness is digested by this argument.
2419:
With respect, Rambling man, simply making apathetic statements and the usage of phrases like "they are probably" do not add anything to your comments and are a waste of time. If you feel there are problems, please list them here before you jump to conclusions and we will try to address them. Thanks.
674:
Indeed, it appears that the prose needs tweaking (even though I'm no copyedit expert :P). For example, sentences like "With six categories awarded with 'Swarna Kamal' (Golden Lotus Award), rest were awarded with 'Rajat Kamal' (Silver Lotus Award)" are monotonous and do not exactly flow with the rest
1858:
wanted references for establishing that DPA is "the most prestigious award of Indian cinema". All awards are referenced to one catalogue. But when subsections were left unreferenced, reviewers have commented like wise. Hence i feel its better to leave those refs the way they are unless we want to
3308:
Thanks
Rambling Man, NapHit, Vensatry and others for the feedback. Yes, the prose is not at the best level. We have made several changes based on the comments of The Rambling man and NapHit. I am not sure if this nomination is still active (it also appears on the failed log). In case it is still
3028:
of PR and were requested to come and comment then. You did not find time then. So did other editors. Hence the PR was closed and FLC started. Now that you suggest to go for PR again, there is no guarantee that it won't remain dull and dry like previous one and we will be here in same positions a
999:
All info the lead is already referenced in the article below per the usual practice. It also does not contain any quotes, which are usually referenced even if present in lead. Are you looking for any particular line in lead that is missing reference? Have added references to those 2 paras. Just
2602:
I am okay if we remove the starting "For" from all quotes. That way it won't be exact copy and thats the only cutting-short possible. But i am against cutting it randomly or rephrasing it on suggestions of people from that GOCE group or anyone just because they are native
English speakers or
2772:
2319:
Though I found a negligible difference in the new version, I have done the above changes. The third point above now reads "Films were required to be certified as a feature film or featurette, or as a
Documentary/Newsreel/Non-Fiction by the Central Board of Film Certification."
3290:
at the moment, I agree with the rambling man, it needs a good copyedit and those citations need checking out. Remember FLC is not a substitute for a peer review, lists should meet the criteria before they are nominated, not eventually meet them someway through the process.
3168:
That may be so, but it would be best to use a more common word, such as the ones I suggested above. You are catering to a worldwide audience so it should be easy for everyone to read, readers shouldn't have to look up the meaning of a word,while reading an article.
3153:
The word felicitate is an example of peculiarity of Indian
English. It is not used in US English, and I am not sure about British English. The word "felicitate" is widely used in Indian English to describe the act of honouring someone/ something in a function or
3146:"to felicitate..." I have just had look up what felicitate means as I've never seen that word before, means congratulate according to the dictionary i consulted. This means it makes no sense, I take it you mean to celebrate Indian cinema? If so change it to that
789:
About capitalization: Should award category titles use sentence case or title case? For categories like "Best
Promotional Film" i feel title case is apt. But for main categories of "Feature Film", "Non-Feature Film" and "Best Writing On Cinema", what should be
3312:
For the possible copy-vio, I suggested the main contributor to use quotation marks for the citations of the awards. Will that solve the copy-vio issue? (If we use quote marks, that means we are accepting that these sentences are verbatim from the source).
3334:. I suggest the oustanding comments are addressed, maybe on the article talkpage, and as I've said a few times, a thorough copyedit of the article is made, and some discussion is held with someone who is knowledgeable in copyvios over those citations.
2958:
It's not up to me to research your article. I'm asking why two out of the nine judges in that section have references. All challengeable facts should be referenced. Please directly reference all of those judges, not just two out of the nine of them.
3043:
It matters because there are two distinct processes. PR is for articles that need help in improving to reach a certain standard (i.e. this list), while FLC is for articles that are of a good standard that need a little polishing to fix. There's no
3090:.... "It features professional standards of writing." Surely by now you can all see that this article is nowhere near a professional level of writing. I've left three large sets of comments already, and that's just the tip of the iceberg. The PR
2978:(And by the way, if a FL director feels this nomination is far from ready, they can, of course, remove it at any time... our resources here at FLC are light already, without having to copyedit entire articles, that's why we have PR and GOCE...)
976:
I think the lead needs to be referenced. You have 2 unsourced paragraphs in the Awards section. "The court imposed 2000 on the petitioner for moving the court without ascertaining the facts of the case." Ref should at least be repeated.
122:
117:
2864:
I don't follow. I don't know what "usuage" means, and I don't understand what "surfaced the fact" means. It's not
English. It may be poor grammatically incorrect English, in which case it should be fixed.
2928:
Not grammar, but a side issue... Overall, the referencing is very hit-and-miss, e.g. what references all the facts about each member of the
Central Jury? Two of them have citations, but the other nine
2879:@TRM: You can not simply discard it saying "It's not English" when there are enough sources provided. If required, we may also provide online sources from US based site. Please let us know on that. -
2522:
is not violated in this instance, and since the quotes given by the NFA committee are always too poetic, the method of keeping only the subjective words inside the quotes is not really useful here.
2447:
2665:
fix these very specific points and wait for more, this is just a demonstration of how much work is left to do before the prose is anywhere close to meeting the requirements of FLC. Here you go:
3279:
That whole sentence reads awkwardly, not sure about the best way to structure it, perhaps "The
Dadasaheb Award, regarded as the most prestigious in Indian cinema, was also awarded at the event"
3352:
Ok, thank you. Will address the outstanding comments, and get opinion from copyvio experts. The list has already been submitted to GOCE. Hope the list will be back in FLC soon :) Regards.--
2701:"At regional level, each panel was formed with one regional head and four members, with regional head and one jury member selected from outside the region and rest from the region" -: -->
2211:
We now know that none of those 3 were jury members. So even if Pran and Rao were "quoted" by Sen (which it isn't per report) it could very well be his guess work. The in.com report says
906:
398:
2217:
And as to the delay, 57th awards were announced in September and 56th in January. I don't think they themselves have any time limit on announcing awards of any category. It would be
2438:). The comment is not "apathetic", nor is it "a waste of time". I have jumped to no conclusions, merely offered an opinion on lengthy quotes which, in the past, have been made a
2296:"With each section having individual aims, Feature Film and Non-Feature Film sections aimed at...." (1) individual aims seems pretty obvious to me. (2) "sections _were_ aimed at"
630:
I can't review the whole list since I don't have much time right now. After a quick look, I can say that the list needs some tweaking, but it is a good candidate for FL status.
2335:
2071:
Many paragraphs are inadequately sourced; For instance, sentences like "Submissions were requested to be submitted on or before January 17, 2012" needs to be cited separately
2536:
Okay, well I firmly believe that you are violating copyright for no benefit to this encyclopedia. Because of that, and the fact the whole article needs copyediting, I
2518:
I have gone through the FLC of Polar Music Prize. The same argument that it is a "citation" and hence cannot be avoided in an article about the award applies here.
2161:
where as announcement of other awards were made only on 19 May. Unlike the previous years this time many contenders were publicly announced (though not officially)
910:
under "article". Even if the content has more prose, the basic page is a list of awards. But if consensus is different i am okay with categorizing it that way." §§
88:
83:
2503:
article? The tables with citations are a 100% copy-and-paste of the PDF article you link, i.e. 100% of the text in the PDF has been reproduced in this list.
92:
2995:
Thanks for your valuable time. I am sure you have better things to do that read this article. But fyi, PR was done and their comments were incorporated. §§
793:
Hindi titles of the awards are included in single quotation marks e.g. 'Rajat Kamal' (Silver Lotus Award). Is that okay? Or should "double quotation" or
75:
3286:
That is just the lead, haven't even touched on the rest of the prose and the citations which are erring towards being a copyvio. I'm going to have to
1486:
to provide flexible number of columns depending on the browser width. The List article gives all the required information in a lucid way. Good job --
1262:"For Feature Films section, the award for the Best Feature Film was shared by two films, ..." repetitive use of "film" three times in about 14 words.
2164:
2170:
40:
3282:"was felicitated" this word again! recognised would be a better word, not everyone has such a wide vocabulary, so best to cater for all readers
2290:"for the best writing on cinema section". Question, why is "best writing on cinema" not capitalised when you capitalised Non-Feature Film etc?
138:
2646:
now, except the copyright part, and since it is felt that more issues cannot be listed, your oppose does not count for that part. Period. You
2650:
to give more detail and comments for doing that and await for the issues to be fixed, instead of just saying that the article has problems.
2157:
I don't think so. They are announced well in advance before the other awards. I still remember K. Balachander's name that was announced on
2379:) is not designed to peer review articles. They should be of a minimum standard before being submitted here. If you can't get success at
2167:
3361:
3343:
3322:
3300:
3261:
3247:
3210:
3196:
3178:
3163:
3115:
3081:
3058:
3038:
3019:
3004:
2987:
2968:
2953:
2911:
2897:
2874:
2859:
2841:
2827:
2732:
2718:
2659:
2630:
2616:
2597:
2583:
2568:
2549:
2531:
2512:
2477:
2459:
2429:
2414:
2396:
2370:
2356:
2329:
2313:
2253:
2230:
2190:
2151:
2128:
2097:
2064:
2031:
1994:
1961:
1927:
1891:
1868:
1839:
1805:
1772:
1739:
1706:
1673:
1640:
1607:
1574:
1541:
1503:
1473:
1459:
1426:
1393:
1357:
1321:
1288:
1255:
1221:
1188:
1151:
1133:
1083:
1054:
1031:
1009:
994:
971:
950:
933:
Ref 31-33, 44, 47, 51 has no publisher. The date format on the references is inconsistent example "September 26, 2011" and "Apr 1, 2012".
919:
896:
874:
844:
825:
806:
772:
755:
739:
717:
684:
669:
640:
625:
584:
551:
518:
485:
452:
419:
380:
340:
321:
303:
266:
228:
209:
179:
2275:"Feature Films were required to be certified as a feature film or...." really?! Sorry but I don't see what this really is getting at....
2361:
For the record, we have withdrawn our request from GOCE, and if you have any problems with the article's prose, please list them here.
2209:"The decision is taken by the committee that includes past recipients like Dilip Kumar, Lata Mangeshkar and Yash Chopra to name some."
30:
17:
2559:. Btw, you still haven't elaborated on the copy-editing part, given that all your past concerns regarding that have been addressed.
2162:
143:
1854:
Those multiple references were added in multiple places because we have received such comments from other reviewers. For eg,
1515:
Print media like "Hindustan Times", "The Hindu" and "Times of India" should be italicized (in refs #1, #13, #30, #31 and #50)
79:
2272:" For Feature and Non-Feature Films, all the films certified by Central Board of Film Certification..." film, film, film....
1779:
Why is TOI not w-linked in refs #10 and #11, either link all or only the first occurrence; same for Indian Express in ref #9
3049:
nomination and ask a native English speaker to copyedit it and peer review it. And be patient if it takes time to happen.
3094:
weak, and you must see that by now given how many comments have been made here at the FLC compared to at the PR... It is
2468:
problems, and no significant amounts of reproduced text that would be considered a copyright violation from any document.
596:
389:"Entries of dubbed/revised/copied ... by the Central Board of Film Certification." There is no source for this whole part.
2723:
Well using the same word five times in a sentence is not "professional, engaging prose" which we seek to achieve at FL.
358:
All the sources mentioned in the external links are official sources except other resources. This is done per another FL
3024:
We welcome comments. That's not a problem. But how does the name of this page, whether called as FLC or PR, matter? You
2593:
2269:"The selection process started by announcing .." not really, "The selection process started with the announcement of..."
1079:
2655:
2564:
2527:
2473:
2425:
2366:
2325:
894:
823:
680:
667:
638:
592:
338:
226:
1873:
I never said to remove those refs. Go for trimming those refs. The present form makes the citations look haphazard.
277:. You may create a category in Wikimedia commons for that, and then link the category in the external links section.
3339:
3206:
3111:
3054:
3015:
2983:
2964:
2907:
2870:
2837:
2728:
2626:
2579:
2545:
2508:
2455:
2410:
2392:
2309:
1469:
1147:
326:
It is, but a whole gallery section with too many pictures makes it too distracting. And also, you will have to add
2902:
Okay, keep it as it is. Please copyedit or arrange for someone independent to copyedit the rest of the article.
1968:"Ministry of Information and Broadcasting" and "Amitabh Bhattacharya" are linked twice in "Award ceremony" section
3243:
3192:
3034:
3000:
2949:
2855:
2823:
2714:
2612:
2226:
1864:
1005:
967:
915:
840:
802:
768:
735:
713:
317:
71:
64:
312:. But the images in this article were added below because of the lack of space. Is that still not acceptable? §§
3184:
2589:
1075:
815:
For "Best Writing On Cinema", "on" shouldn't be capitalized. As of Hindi titles, they should be italicized.
2651:
2621:
I didn't suggest that. I suggest GOCE copyedited the main prose in the article, not the floral tributes.
2560:
2555:
I wish to get Vivvt's and AK's opinion on this, but as of now, my stance is perfectly neutral in order to
2523:
2469:
2434:
With respect, I'm just trying to warn you. I'm no expert, please find one (I have previously recommended
2421:
2362:
2321:
2204:
676:
3335:
3202:
3140:
3107:
3050:
3011:
2979:
2960:
2903:
2866:
2833:
2724:
2622:
2575:
2541:
2504:
2451:
2406:
2388:
2305:
1855:
1495:
1465:
1143:
1139:
659:
Good work overall. The prose seems fine to me, but like always, a copy-editor may find some problems.
3357:
3318:
3239:
3188:
3159:
3098:
the role of FLC to ensure that article prose is written in grammatically correct English, that's for
3030:
2996:
2945:
2851:
2819:
2710:
2608:
2222:
2213:"If sources are to be believed, then the coveted honour is either going to Vyjayanthimala or Pran..."
1860:
1400:"for his paramount contribution" keep it neutral unless someone has actually said it was "paramount".
1001:
963:
911:
836:
798:
764:
751:
731:
709:
313:
185:
3143:, bold links are to be avoided, either remove the bold or the link, this was mentioned before by TRM
2695:"also awarded with a Medallion for" why capital M here? And do you really need to link it to Medal?
2104:
There was a delay in announcing the Dadasaheb Palke Award this year. A mention of that could be made
1433:"The ceremony also had its live telecast on" why not "ceremony was broadcast live on television..."?
887:
816:
660:
631:
331:
219:
2937:
2519:
2465:
2435:
1489:
892:
883:
821:
665:
636:
359:
336:
309:
224:
2832:
Not really. It was the "surfaced the fact" that I was referring to. That's not really English.
1328:"which is regarded as the most prestigious award of Indian cinema" where is this claim referenced?
3045:
2401:
I'd also like you to double-check the use of those citations, they are so long they are probably
2245:
2182:
2143:
1883:
1847:
866:
191:
I am nominating this for featured list because... the article has a great potential to be one. -
2334:@The Rambling Man: We had already raised a request to Guild of Copy Editors on 8th August. See
2500:
2443:
2402:
401:
and was explained then and there. But still I have added source to avoid further confusion. -
308:@Vaibhav, Most of the award ceremony articles have images of winners on the side. See sample
3309:
active, I would request reviewers to give their valuable suggestions to improve the prose.
3296:
3257:
3201:
Not really. If it's not a widely understood phrase in English then it should be replaced.
3174:
1483:
1021:
984:
940:
2158:
724:"... was awarded as Best Book on Cinema; whereas an Assamese film... " Whereas not needed.
3353:
3331:
3314:
3155:
3087:
3074:
2890:
2349:
2121:
2090:
2057:
2024:
1987:
1954:
1920:
1832:
1798:
1765:
1732:
1699:
1666:
1633:
1600:
1567:
1534:
1452:
1419:
1386:
1350:
1314:
1281:
1248:
1214:
1181:
1126:
1047:
1014:
On review I think the sentence regarding how it was broadcast could likely be challenged.
747:
618:
577:
544:
511:
478:
445:
412:
373:
296:
259:
202:
172:
53:
2387:
and get a few reviewers who are native English speakers to go over it a couple of times.
459:"Introduced in 1969, the birth centenary...its growth and promotion." No source for this.
2940:
it so far. Do you have any reasonable challenges to any things in there? Go through the
3103:
2588:
The quotes are actually ok as they describe the actual reason for inclusion. Regards.--
2556:
2380:
2301:
2709:"regional head" is like a post, like "regional manager". Hence it is used that way. §§
2795::- "...I felt they needed an agreed end position - terms of settlement - before they
2376:
2238:
2175:
2136:
1876:
1108:
859:
692:
Have not read the whole thing. However, prose issues are apparent from the beginning.
327:
2684:"growth and development of Indian Cinema" why is cinema capitalised this time round?
3099:
2941:
2674:"submissions" quickly followed by "submitted"? Not professional standard of prose.
2604:
2384:
2218:
274:
2687:"A recipient of Dadasaheb Phalke Award at 53rd National Film Awards, Beneg" -: -->
109:
2300:
Just starting the Awards section, but this is clearly in need of a copyedit from
2110:
Phalke Award is always declared later. That should not be considered as delay. -
3292:
3253:
3170:
2806:
1015:
978:
934:
2789:
that investigators' conceptualizations of race and ethnicity are incomplete..."
3064:
2880:
2499:
to be a direct copy-and-paste and the same in nature to problems faced by the
2339:
2111:
2080:
2047:
2014:
1977:
1944:
1910:
1822:
1788:
1755:
1722:
1689:
1656:
1623:
1590:
1557:
1524:
1442:
1409:
1376:
1340:
1304:
1271:
1238:
1204:
1171:
1116:
1037:
608:
567:
534:
501:
468:
435:
402:
363:
286:
249:
192:
162:
2293:
Especially when you have "and Best Writing on Cinema..." in the next section.
1295:
Similar comment applies to the next sentence which has film about five times.
856:
This article with a prose size of 15k bytes doesn't look like a list for me.
3183:
I don't think that's an essential criteria for FL/FA/GA or even Stub. Check
2698:"awarded at All India as" what is "All India"? Do you just mean "national"?
2079:. Please let us know if any unsourced/inadequately sourced content found. -
2773:
Report of the congressional committees investigating the Iran-Contra Affair
2793:
Foreign Relations of the United States, 1964-1968, Volume V: Vietnam, 1967
2680:"to a film personality for the outstanding contribution to the ..." -: -->
426:
Ref 4 doesn't support a huge part of the first para of the Awards section.
3238:
Which "the"? You mean second? Should "Best" be not preceded by "the"? §§
2783:
Applied Research in Child and Adolescent Development: A Practical Guide
2304:.... Suggest withdrawing and getting a third party to have a look....
2207:
to be contenders. It quotes Supran Sen of Film Federation of India as
1746:
Italicize "TOI" in the section "Southern Region II: (Kannada, Telugu)"
2702:
the word "region" appears in this sentence five times. Not engaging.
2681:
why is it "the" outstanding contribution? Should be "his" or "her".
1142:, we don't actually need to partially or entirely bold lead links.
746:"...to a Bengali actor Soumitra Chatterjee...". To "the". Regards.--
492:
Try to avoid words like eminent, which make the article non-neutral.
39:
Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in
2755:"As ceremony marked the beginning of the centenary year ..." -: -->
2442:
shorter to avoid copyright violations. See the recently promoted
1000:
repeated them. Same with court thing; just moved the reference. §§
2747:"In Non-Feature Film section, 21 films have been awarded " -: -->
2200:
3187:. Take it in a positive way. You are +1 in your vocab today. §§
1366:"award was announced on March 23, 2012 and was awarded " -: -->
3231:"shared the award for the Best Feature Film." the is redundant
2763:"which surfaced the fact that " Not even sure what this means.
2752:"the maximum" or do you really mean "winning the most awards"?
697:
Very short, one-sentence choppy opening paragraph in the lead.
3029:
month later. So i suggest you keep commenting here itself. §§
362:. Are you explicitly looking for something to be removed? -
3252:
Yes the one before Best, it doesn't read well, with it in.
2748:"In the Non-Feature Film section, 21 films were awarded..."
123:
Featured list candidates/59th National Film Awards/archive2
118:
Featured list candidates/59th National Film Awards/archive1
240:
The logo can be cropped to meet the non-free media policy.
2670:"and also had live webcast" - "and was also webcast live"
2282:"making it the highest in the history" what is "it" here?
148:
2846:
That's the reason why examples of usuage of this phrase
2172:. I'm not forcing you upon this. You may like to add it
3025:
2375:
I don't think that's the best approach. This process (
2235:
Alright! As I said earlier, I'm not forcing upon this.
105:
101:
97:
57:
2751:"three films winning maximum number of awards " -: -->
2464:
I have checked the article for copyvios. There are no
2289:"submitted for best writing on cinema section" -: -->
2199:
Those are all speculations i suppose. MidDay reports
2673:"Submissions were requested to be submitted " -: -->
1074:
Although I think it is rather an article. Regards.--
1647:
Why is Press Trust of India italicized in many refs
558:
No source for the whole Golden Lotus Award section.
1115:? I'm not sure if we need to reformat the lead. -
3367:The above discussion is preserved as an archive.
2338:. Unfortunately, we got no response till date. -
1614:Ref #63 has neither work nor publisher parameters
525:There is a cn tag in the article. Please fix it.
3275:"better known as Dadasaheb Phalke Award" -: -->
3086:Sorry but I think that's a bit naive. Look at
2264:Further comments beyond the lead - still oppose
1036:Rearranged the references for the broadcast. -
43:. No further edits should be made to this page.
2759:"of Indian Cinema, the ceremony started"-: -->
2688:"at _the_ 53rd...." there are dozens of these.
2607:under names of that Award's qualified jury. §§
2046:. No direct link found. Linked to Siri Fort.-
1162:C of Indian Cinema doesn't need to be in caps.
3373:No further edits should be made to this page.
2803:America and Europe After Nine-eleven and Iraq
330:for each image, which can be a tedious task.
29:The following is an archived discussion of a
8:
2677:"awrd .... was also awarded ..." same again.
2038:Link "Siri Fort Auditorium II" appropriately
886:has 13361 characters, but it is still a FL.
2799:of negotiation to the NLF and the Chinese."
2779:that there is a new stock number for MOIC."
1195:"for the year 2011" no need for "the year".
3330:this nomination was archived yesterday by
2450:as an example of this. Hope that helps.
1813:p. 156 in ref #8, same in #34, #35 and #39
1548:Why is "Supriyo Sen" in ref #49 italicized
784:: Regarding copy editing i had two doubts:
213:
127:
2691:"The award for the year 2011 was " -: -->
2743:"Following were the awards given" -: -->
216:
2603:whatever. We can't have these editor's
2279:"received in the Feature Film category"
130:
115:
41:Knowledge talk:Featured list candidates
2744:"The following awards were presented".
1367:award ... awarded is repetitive prose.
1335:Added relevant sources (16,17,18,19).
1103:Should we not bold the complete title
351:Remove the unnecessary external links.
7:
2302:someone who knows what they're doing
2285:" Non-Feature Films category" -: -->
2278:"received for Feature Films" -: -->
1846:refs like this , and , should be
1688:. Replaced with another source. -
1622:. Replaced with another source. -
1581:"IBN Live" shouldn't be italicized
1228:"For Feature Films section" -: -->
273:Remove the gallery section as per
24:
18:Knowledge:Featured list candidates
2944:first. Most of it is in there. §§
2760:"of Indian cinema, it started..."
2809:) told me, "The Iraqi issue has
1:
3272:likewise in the next sentence
1934:Best Writing On Cinema -: -->
1096:No need to have 59th in bold.
597:Category:National Film Awards
2813:that this relationship..."".
1859:keep playing seesaw here. §§
3362:17:18, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
3344:08:06, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
3323:03:36, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
3301:14:42, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
3262:16:58, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
3248:15:08, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
3211:07:53, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
3197:17:25, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
3179:16:58, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
3164:15:07, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
3116:14:06, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
3082:13:01, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
3059:07:53, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
3039:07:47, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
3020:06:59, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
3005:15:00, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
2988:14:05, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
2969:06:59, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
2954:15:00, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
2912:14:08, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
2898:13:01, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
2875:07:53, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
2860:07:47, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
2842:06:59, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
2828:15:00, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
2733:06:59, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
2719:15:00, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
2660:13:40, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
2631:13:28, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
2617:13:25, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
2598:13:14, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
2584:13:28, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
2569:13:02, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
2550:12:51, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
2532:12:47, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
2513:12:44, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
2478:12:31, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
2460:12:19, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
2430:12:04, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
2415:10:23, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
2397:10:20, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
2383:then I suggest you head to
2371:17:36, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
2357:13:57, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
2330:13:59, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
2314:18:09, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
2254:18:12, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
2231:09:40, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
2191:05:13, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
2152:07:49, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
2129:22:33, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
2098:22:33, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
2065:22:33, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
2032:22:33, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
1995:22:33, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
1962:22:33, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
1928:22:33, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
1892:18:10, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
1869:09:40, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
1840:22:33, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
1806:22:33, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
1773:22:33, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
1740:22:33, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
1707:22:33, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
1674:22:33, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
1641:22:33, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
1608:22:33, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
1575:22:33, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
1542:22:33, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
1504:20:14, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
1482:made a minor correction in
1474:16:10, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
1460:20:27, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
1427:20:27, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
1394:20:27, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
1358:02:32, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
1322:02:32, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
1289:02:32, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
1256:20:27, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
1222:20:27, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
1189:20:27, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
1152:16:53, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
1134:02:32, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
1092:on prose in the lead only.
1084:19:41, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
1055:03:56, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
1032:12:02, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
1010:10:55, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
995:10:01, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
972:08:18, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
951:07:13, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
593:Category:Indian film awards
3390:
1680:What makes "ejumpcut" a RS
1229:"For the Feature Films..."
920:14:37, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
897:14:34, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
875:14:26, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
845:11:58, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
826:10:05, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
807:07:03, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
773:07:00, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
756:05:19, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
740:07:00, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
718:07:00, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
685:15:05, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
670:12:33, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
397:. This was pointed out in
229:12:33, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
2785::- "Participant comments
2692:"year" is redundant here.
1105:59th National Film Awards
641:08:33, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
626:20:12, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
585:20:12, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
552:20:12, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
519:20:12, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
486:20:12, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
453:20:12, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
420:20:12, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
381:20:12, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
341:17:07, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
322:17:01, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
304:20:12, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
267:20:12, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
210:15:02, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
180:15:02, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
72:59th National Film Awards
65:59th National Film Awards
3370:Please do not modify it.
1713:Ref #22 needs correction
599:is already a part of it.
36:Please do not modify it.
31:featured list nomination
3185:Template:Indian English
1900:Certificate Only -: -->
218:Resolved comments from
3010:is simply not ready.
2756:"As _the_ ceremony..."
2495:So you don't consider
2221:to put it that way. §§
1935:Best Writing on Cinema
56:15:26, 28 August 2012
1856:User:The Rambling Man
3225:"judged 392 entries
2403:copyright violations
2286:"The Non-Feature..."
186:User:Animeshkulkarni
3276:the Dadasaheb Award
2818:Is this helpful? §§
2446:and its associated
2436:User:Moonriddengirl
884:82nd Academy Awards
360:82nd Academy Awards
310:82nd Academy Awards
2942:official catalogue
2001:USD conversion of
889:♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛
818:♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛
662:♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛
633:♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛
333:♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛
221:♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛
2811:surfaced the fact
2797:surfaced the fact
2787:surfaced the fact
2777:surfaced the fact
2652:Secret of success
2561:Secret of success
2540:this candidate.
2524:Secret of success
2501:Polar Music Prize
2470:Secret of success
2444:Polar Music Prize
2422:Secret of success
2363:Secret of success
2322:Secret of success
677:Secret of success
650:
649:
328:alternative texts
183:
156:
155:
3381:
3372:
3336:The Rambling Man
3203:The Rambling Man
3108:The Rambling Man
3080:
3077:
3069:
3068:
3051:The Rambling Man
3012:The Rambling Man
2980:The Rambling Man
2961:The Rambling Man
2904:The Rambling Man
2896:
2893:
2885:
2884:
2867:The Rambling Man
2834:The Rambling Man
2725:The Rambling Man
2623:The Rambling Man
2576:The Rambling Man
2542:The Rambling Man
2505:The Rambling Man
2452:The Rambling Man
2407:The Rambling Man
2389:The Rambling Man
2355:
2352:
2344:
2343:
2306:The Rambling Man
2252:
2243:
2189:
2180:
2150:
2141:
2127:
2124:
2116:
2115:
2096:
2093:
2085:
2084:
2063:
2060:
2052:
2051:
2030:
2027:
2019:
2018:
2004:
1993:
1990:
1982:
1981:
1960:
1957:
1949:
1948:
1926:
1923:
1915:
1914:
1901:Certificate only
1890:
1881:
1838:
1835:
1827:
1826:
1804:
1801:
1793:
1792:
1771:
1768:
1760:
1759:
1738:
1735:
1727:
1726:
1705:
1702:
1694:
1693:
1672:
1669:
1661:
1660:
1639:
1636:
1628:
1627:
1606:
1603:
1595:
1594:
1573:
1570:
1562:
1561:
1540:
1537:
1529:
1528:
1501:
1499:
1493:
1484:Template:Reflist
1466:The Rambling Man
1458:
1455:
1447:
1446:
1425:
1422:
1414:
1413:
1392:
1389:
1381:
1380:
1356:
1353:
1345:
1344:
1320:
1317:
1309:
1308:
1287:
1284:
1276:
1275:
1254:
1251:
1243:
1242:
1220:
1217:
1209:
1208:
1187:
1184:
1176:
1175:
1144:The Rambling Man
1132:
1129:
1121:
1120:
1053:
1050:
1042:
1041:
1028:
1018:
991:
981:
947:
937:
890:
873:
864:
819:
797:be used here? §§
663:
634:
624:
621:
613:
612:
583:
580:
572:
571:
550:
547:
539:
538:
517:
514:
506:
505:
484:
481:
473:
472:
451:
448:
440:
439:
418:
415:
407:
406:
379:
376:
368:
367:
334:
302:
299:
291:
290:
265:
262:
254:
253:
222:
217:
214:
208:
205:
197:
196:
178:
175:
167:
166:
161:Nominator(s): -
159:
128:
113:
95:
38:
3389:
3388:
3384:
3383:
3382:
3380:
3379:
3378:
3377:
3368:
3332:User:Giants2008
3240:AnimeshKulkarni
3189:AnimeshKulkarni
3075:
3072:
3066:
3065:
3031:AnimeshKulkarni
2997:AnimeshKulkarni
2946:AnimeshKulkarni
2891:
2888:
2882:
2881:
2852:AnimeshKulkarni
2820:AnimeshKulkarni
2711:AnimeshKulkarni
2609:AnimeshKulkarni
2557:reduce the heat
2538:strongly oppose
2350:
2347:
2341:
2340:
2250:
2239:
2236:
2223:AnimeshKulkarni
2205:E Nageshwar Rao
2187:
2176:
2173:
2148:
2137:
2134:
2122:
2119:
2113:
2112:
2091:
2088:
2082:
2081:
2058:
2055:
2049:
2048:
2025:
2022:
2016:
2015:
2002:
1988:
1985:
1979:
1978:
1955:
1952:
1946:
1945:
1921:
1918:
1912:
1911:
1888:
1877:
1874:
1861:AnimeshKulkarni
1833:
1830:
1824:
1823:
1799:
1796:
1790:
1789:
1766:
1763:
1757:
1756:
1733:
1730:
1724:
1723:
1700:
1697:
1691:
1690:
1667:
1664:
1658:
1657:
1634:
1631:
1625:
1624:
1601:
1598:
1592:
1591:
1568:
1565:
1559:
1558:
1535:
1532:
1526:
1525:
1497:
1491:
1488:
1453:
1450:
1444:
1443:
1420:
1417:
1411:
1410:
1387:
1384:
1378:
1377:
1351:
1348:
1342:
1341:
1315:
1312:
1306:
1305:
1282:
1279:
1273:
1272:
1249:
1246:
1240:
1239:
1215:
1212:
1206:
1205:
1182:
1179:
1173:
1172:
1127:
1124:
1118:
1117:
1048:
1045:
1039:
1038:
1022:
1016:
1002:AnimeshKulkarni
985:
979:
964:AnimeshKulkarni
941:
935:
912:AnimeshKulkarni
907:the peer review
888:
871:
860:
857:
837:AnimeshKulkarni
817:
799:AnimeshKulkarni
765:AnimeshKulkarni
732:AnimeshKulkarni
710:AnimeshKulkarni
661:
632:
619:
616:
610:
609:
578:
575:
569:
568:
545:
542:
536:
535:
512:
509:
503:
502:
479:
476:
470:
469:
446:
443:
437:
436:
413:
410:
404:
403:
374:
371:
365:
364:
332:
314:AnimeshKulkarni
297:
294:
288:
287:
260:
257:
251:
250:
220:
203:
200:
194:
193:
173:
170:
164:
163:
86:
70:
68:
34:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
3387:
3385:
3376:
3375:
3364:
3284:
3283:
3280:
3277:
3273:
3269:
3268:
3267:
3266:
3265:
3264:
3233:
3232:
3229:
3222:
3221:
3220:
3219:
3218:
3217:
3216:
3215:
3214:
3213:
3148:
3147:
3144:
3141:WP:CONTEXTLINK
3131:
3130:
3129:
3128:
3127:
3126:
3125:
3124:
3123:
3122:
3121:
3120:
3119:
3118:
2976:
2975:
2974:
2973:
2972:
2971:
2931:
2930:
2925:
2924:
2923:
2922:
2921:
2920:
2919:
2918:
2917:
2916:
2915:
2914:
2900:
2816:
2815:
2814:
2800:
2790:
2780:
2765:
2764:
2761:
2757:
2753:
2749:
2745:
2740:
2739:
2738:
2737:
2736:
2735:
2704:
2703:
2699:
2696:
2693:
2689:
2685:
2682:
2678:
2675:
2671:
2667:
2666:
2644:
2643:
2642:
2641:
2640:
2639:
2638:
2637:
2636:
2635:
2634:
2633:
2586:
2493:
2492:
2491:
2490:
2489:
2488:
2487:
2486:
2485:
2484:
2483:
2482:
2481:
2480:
2399:
2298:
2297:
2294:
2291:
2287:
2283:
2280:
2276:
2273:
2270:
2261:
2260:
2259:
2258:
2257:
2256:
2246:
2216:
2194:
2193:
2183:
2144:
2132:
2131:
2107:
2106:
2105:
2101:
2100:
2073:
2072:
2068:
2067:
2040:
2039:
2035:
2034:
2007:
2006:
2005:2000 is needed
1998:
1997:
1970:
1969:
1965:
1964:
1937:
1936:
1931:
1930:
1903:
1902:
1897:
1896:
1895:
1894:
1884:
1851:
1850:
1843:
1842:
1815:
1814:
1812:pp. 156 -: -->
1809:
1808:
1781:
1780:
1776:
1775:
1748:
1747:
1743:
1742:
1715:
1714:
1710:
1709:
1682:
1681:
1677:
1676:
1649:
1648:
1644:
1643:
1616:
1615:
1611:
1610:
1583:
1582:
1578:
1577:
1550:
1549:
1545:
1544:
1517:
1516:
1510:Partial oppose
1507:
1506:
1463:
1462:
1435:
1434:
1430:
1429:
1402:
1401:
1397:
1396:
1369:
1368:
1363:
1362:
1361:
1360:
1330:
1329:
1325:
1324:
1297:
1296:
1292:
1291:
1264:
1263:
1259:
1258:
1231:
1230:
1225:
1224:
1197:
1196:
1192:
1191:
1164:
1163:
1159:
1158:
1157:
1156:
1155:
1154:
1140:WP:CONTEXTLINK
1098:
1097:
1087:
1086:
1068:
1067:
1066:
1065:
1064:
1063:
1062:
1061:
1060:
1059:
1058:
1057:
954:
953:
927:
926:
925:
924:
923:
922:
900:
899:
878:
877:
867:
850:
849:
848:
847:
829:
828:
810:
809:
791:
786:
785:
778:
777:
776:
775:
744:
743:
742:
722:
721:
720:
699:
698:
694:
693:
687:
675:of the prose.
672:
652:
648:
647:
646:
645:
644:
643:
601:
600:
588:
587:
560:
559:
555:
554:
527:
526:
522:
521:
494:
493:
489:
488:
461:
460:
456:
455:
428:
427:
423:
422:
391:
390:
386:
385:
384:
383:
353:
352:
348:
347:
346:
345:
344:
343:
279:
278:
270:
269:
242:
241:
232:
231:
189:
188:
154:
153:
152:
151:
149:External links
146:
141:
133:
132:
126:
125:
120:
67:
62:
61:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
3386:
3374:
3371:
3365:
3363:
3359:
3355:
3351:
3348:
3347:
3346:
3345:
3341:
3337:
3333:
3329:
3325:
3324:
3320:
3316:
3310:
3307:
3303:
3302:
3298:
3294:
3289:
3281:
3278:
3274:
3271:
3270:
3263:
3259:
3255:
3251:
3250:
3249:
3245:
3241:
3237:
3236:
3235:
3234:
3230:
3228:
3224:
3223:
3212:
3208:
3204:
3200:
3199:
3198:
3194:
3190:
3186:
3182:
3181:
3180:
3176:
3172:
3167:
3166:
3165:
3161:
3157:
3152:
3151:
3150:
3149:
3145:
3142:
3138:
3137:
3136:
3135:
3117:
3113:
3109:
3105:
3101:
3097:
3093:
3089:
3085:
3084:
3083:
3078:
3070:
3062:
3061:
3060:
3056:
3052:
3047:
3042:
3041:
3040:
3036:
3032:
3027:
3026:were notified
3023:
3022:
3021:
3017:
3013:
3008:
3007:
3006:
3002:
2998:
2994:
2993:
2992:
2991:
2990:
2989:
2985:
2981:
2970:
2966:
2962:
2957:
2956:
2955:
2951:
2947:
2943:
2939:
2935:
2934:
2933:
2932:
2927:
2926:
2913:
2909:
2905:
2901:
2899:
2894:
2886:
2878:
2877:
2876:
2872:
2868:
2863:
2862:
2861:
2857:
2853:
2850:are given. §§
2849:
2845:
2844:
2843:
2839:
2835:
2831:
2830:
2829:
2825:
2821:
2817:
2812:
2808:
2804:
2801:
2798:
2794:
2791:
2788:
2784:
2781:
2778:
2774:
2771:
2770:
2769:
2768:
2767:
2766:
2762:
2758:
2754:
2750:
2746:
2742:
2741:
2734:
2730:
2726:
2722:
2721:
2720:
2716:
2712:
2708:
2707:
2706:
2705:
2700:
2697:
2694:
2690:
2686:
2683:
2679:
2676:
2672:
2669:
2668:
2663:
2662:
2661:
2657:
2653:
2649:
2632:
2628:
2624:
2620:
2619:
2618:
2614:
2610:
2606:
2601:
2600:
2599:
2595:
2591:
2587:
2585:
2581:
2577:
2572:
2571:
2570:
2566:
2562:
2558:
2553:
2552:
2551:
2547:
2543:
2539:
2535:
2534:
2533:
2529:
2525:
2521:
2517:
2516:
2515:
2514:
2510:
2506:
2502:
2498:
2479:
2475:
2471:
2467:
2463:
2462:
2461:
2457:
2453:
2449:
2445:
2441:
2437:
2433:
2432:
2431:
2427:
2423:
2418:
2417:
2416:
2412:
2408:
2404:
2400:
2398:
2394:
2390:
2386:
2382:
2378:
2374:
2373:
2372:
2368:
2364:
2360:
2359:
2358:
2353:
2345:
2337:
2333:
2332:
2331:
2327:
2323:
2318:
2317:
2316:
2315:
2311:
2307:
2303:
2295:
2292:
2288:
2284:
2281:
2277:
2274:
2271:
2268:
2267:
2266:
2265:
2255:
2251:
2249:
2244:
2242:
2234:
2233:
2232:
2228:
2224:
2220:
2214:
2210:
2206:
2202:
2198:
2197:
2196:
2195:
2192:
2188:
2186:
2181:
2179:
2171:
2168:
2165:
2163:
2160:
2159:29 April 2011
2156:
2155:
2154:
2153:
2149:
2147:
2142:
2140:
2130:
2125:
2117:
2109:
2108:
2103:
2102:
2099:
2094:
2086:
2078:
2075:
2074:
2070:
2069:
2066:
2061:
2053:
2045:
2042:
2041:
2037:
2036:
2033:
2028:
2020:
2012:
2009:
2008:
2000:
1999:
1996:
1991:
1983:
1975:
1972:
1971:
1967:
1966:
1963:
1958:
1950:
1942:
1939:
1938:
1933:
1932:
1929:
1924:
1916:
1908:
1905:
1904:
1899:
1898:
1893:
1889:
1887:
1882:
1880:
1872:
1871:
1870:
1866:
1862:
1857:
1853:
1852:
1849:
1845:
1844:
1841:
1836:
1828:
1820:
1817:
1816:
1811:
1810:
1807:
1802:
1794:
1786:
1783:
1782:
1778:
1777:
1774:
1769:
1761:
1753:
1750:
1749:
1745:
1744:
1741:
1736:
1728:
1720:
1717:
1716:
1712:
1711:
1708:
1703:
1695:
1687:
1684:
1683:
1679:
1678:
1675:
1670:
1662:
1654:
1651:
1650:
1646:
1645:
1642:
1637:
1629:
1621:
1618:
1617:
1613:
1612:
1609:
1604:
1596:
1588:
1585:
1584:
1580:
1579:
1576:
1571:
1563:
1555:
1552:
1551:
1547:
1546:
1543:
1538:
1530:
1522:
1519:
1518:
1514:
1513:
1512:
1511:
1505:
1502:
1500:
1494:
1485:
1481:
1478:
1477:
1476:
1475:
1471:
1467:
1461:
1456:
1448:
1440:
1437:
1436:
1432:
1431:
1428:
1423:
1415:
1407:
1404:
1403:
1399:
1398:
1395:
1390:
1382:
1374:
1371:
1370:
1365:
1364:
1359:
1354:
1346:
1338:
1334:
1333:
1332:
1331:
1327:
1326:
1323:
1318:
1310:
1302:
1299:
1298:
1294:
1293:
1290:
1285:
1277:
1269:
1266:
1265:
1261:
1260:
1257:
1252:
1244:
1236:
1233:
1232:
1227:
1226:
1223:
1218:
1210:
1202:
1199:
1198:
1194:
1193:
1190:
1185:
1177:
1169:
1166:
1165:
1161:
1160:
1153:
1149:
1145:
1141:
1137:
1136:
1135:
1130:
1122:
1114:
1110:
1109:MOS:BOLDTITLE
1106:
1102:
1101:
1100:
1099:
1095:
1094:
1093:
1091:
1085:
1081:
1077:
1073:
1070:
1069:
1056:
1051:
1043:
1035:
1034:
1033:
1029:
1027:
1026:
1019:
1013:
1012:
1011:
1007:
1003:
998:
997:
996:
992:
990:
989:
982:
975:
974:
973:
969:
965:
961:
958:
957:
956:
955:
952:
948:
946:
945:
938:
932:
929:
928:
921:
917:
913:
908:
904:
903:
902:
901:
898:
895:
893:
891:
885:
882:
881:
880:
879:
876:
872:
870:
865:
863:
855:
852:
851:
846:
842:
838:
834:
831:
830:
827:
824:
822:
820:
814:
813:
812:
811:
808:
804:
800:
796:
792:
788:
787:
783:
780:
779:
774:
770:
766:
762:
759:
758:
757:
753:
749:
745:
741:
737:
733:
729:
726:
725:
723:
719:
715:
711:
707:
704:
703:
701:
700:
696:
695:
691:
688:
686:
682:
678:
673:
671:
668:
666:
664:
658:
655:
654:
653:
642:
639:
637:
635:
629:
628:
627:
622:
614:
606:
603:
602:
598:
594:
590:
589:
586:
581:
573:
565:
562:
561:
557:
556:
553:
548:
540:
532:
529:
528:
524:
523:
520:
515:
507:
499:
496:
495:
491:
490:
487:
482:
474:
466:
463:
462:
458:
457:
454:
449:
441:
433:
430:
429:
425:
424:
421:
416:
408:
400:
396:
393:
392:
388:
387:
382:
377:
369:
361:
357:
356:
355:
354:
350:
349:
342:
339:
337:
335:
329:
325:
324:
323:
319:
315:
311:
307:
306:
305:
300:
292:
284:
281:
280:
276:
272:
271:
268:
263:
255:
247:
244:
243:
239:
238:
237:
234:
233:
230:
227:
225:
223:
215:
212:
211:
206:
198:
187:
182:
181:
176:
168:
158:
157:
150:
147:
145:
142:
140:
137:
136:
135:
134:
129:
124:
121:
119:
116:
114:
111:
107:
103:
99:
94:
90:
85:
81:
77:
73:
66:
63:
60:
58:
55:
51:
48:The list was
44:
42:
37:
32:
27:
26:
19:
3369:
3366:
3349:
3327:
3326:
3311:
3305:
3304:
3287:
3285:
3226:
3133:
3132:
3095:
3091:
2977:
2847:
2810:
2796:
2786:
2776:
2647:
2537:
2520:WP:QUOTEFARM
2496:
2494:
2466:WP:QUOTEFARM
2439:
2299:
2263:
2262:
2247:
2240:
2219:our research
2212:
2208:
2184:
2177:
2145:
2138:
2133:
2076:
2043:
2010:
1973:
1940:
1906:
1885:
1878:
1818:
1784:
1751:
1718:
1685:
1652:
1619:
1586:
1553:
1520:
1509:
1508:
1487:
1479:
1464:
1438:
1405:
1372:
1336:
1300:
1267:
1234:
1200:
1167:
1112:
1104:
1089:
1088:
1071:
1024:
1023:
987:
986:
959:
943:
942:
930:
868:
861:
853:
832:
794:
781:
760:
727:
705:
689:
656:
651:
604:
563:
530:
497:
464:
431:
394:
282:
245:
235:
190:
160:
144:Citation bot
69:
50:not promoted
49:
47:
35:
28:
3154:ceremony.--
3088:criterion 1
2936:No one had
2807:Ana Palacio
1848:cite killed
399:Peer review
3313:Regards.--
2938:challenged
2848:in English
2605:researches
1111:than just
54:Giants2008
3354:Dwaipayan
3315:Dwaipayan
3227:submitted
3156:Dwaipayan
2805::- "She (
2775::- "...
2248:(Ping me)
2185:(Ping me)
2146:(Ping me)
1886:(Ping me)
869:(Ping me)
748:Dwaipayan
3134:Comments
3046:deadline
2241:Vensatry
2178:Vensatry
2139:Vensatry
1879:Vensatry
1138:No, see
931:Comments
862:Vensatry
595:, since
236:Comments
139:Analysis
3328:Comment
3306:Comment
3104:WP:GOCE
2381:WP:GOCE
1480:Support
1072:Support
854:Comment
795:italics
690:Comment
657:Support
591:Remove
131:Toolbox
89:protect
84:history
3350:Thanks
3293:NapHit
3288:oppose
3254:NapHit
3171:NapHit
2929:don't.
2590:Kürbis
2377:WP:FLC
1090:Oppose
1076:Kürbis
93:delete
3100:WP:PR
3067:Vivvt
2883:Vivvt
2385:WP:PR
2342:Vivvt
2114:Vivvt
2083:Vivvt
2050:Vivvt
2017:Vivvt
1980:Vivvt
1947:Vivvt
1913:Vivvt
1825:Vivvt
1791:Vivvt
1758:Vivvt
1725:Vivvt
1692:Vivvt
1659:Vivvt
1626:Vivvt
1593:Vivvt
1560:Vivvt
1527:Vivvt
1445:Vivvt
1412:Vivvt
1379:Vivvt
1343:Vivvt
1307:Vivvt
1274:Vivvt
1241:Vivvt
1207:Vivvt
1174:Vivvt
1119:Vivvt
1040:Vivvt
790:used?
782:Query
611:Vivvt
570:Vivvt
537:Vivvt
504:Vivvt
471:Vivvt
438:Vivvt
405:Vivvt
366:Vivvt
289:Vivvt
275:WP:IG
252:Vivvt
195:Vivvt
165:Vivvt
110:views
102:watch
98:links
16:<
3358:talk
3340:talk
3319:talk
3297:talk
3258:talk
3244:talk
3207:talk
3193:talk
3175:talk
3160:talk
3139:Per
3112:talk
3076:Talk
3055:talk
3035:talk
3016:talk
3001:talk
2984:talk
2965:talk
2950:talk
2908:talk
2892:Talk
2871:talk
2856:talk
2838:talk
2824:talk
2729:talk
2715:talk
2656:talk
2648:have
2627:talk
2613:talk
2580:talk
2565:talk
2546:talk
2528:talk
2509:talk
2474:talk
2456:talk
2426:talk
2411:talk
2393:talk
2367:talk
2351:Talk
2336:here
2326:talk
2310:talk
2227:talk
2215:!!!
2203:and
2201:Pran
2169:and
2123:Talk
2092:Talk
2077:Done
2059:Talk
2044:Done
2026:Talk
2013:. -
2011:Done
1989:Talk
1976:. -
1974:Done
1956:Talk
1943:. -
1941:Done
1922:Talk
1909:. -
1907:Done
1865:talk
1834:Talk
1821:. -
1819:Done
1800:Talk
1787:. -
1785:Done
1767:Talk
1754:. -
1752:Done
1734:Talk
1721:. -
1719:Done
1701:Talk
1686:Done
1668:Talk
1655:. -
1653:Done
1635:Talk
1620:Done
1602:Talk
1589:. -
1587:Done
1569:Talk
1556:. -
1554:Done
1536:Talk
1523:. -
1521:Done
1470:talk
1454:Talk
1439:done
1421:Talk
1406:done
1388:Talk
1373:done
1352:Talk
1337:done
1316:Talk
1301:done
1283:Talk
1268:done
1250:Talk
1235:done
1216:Talk
1201:done
1183:Talk
1168:done
1148:talk
1128:Talk
1113:59th
1107:per
1049:Talk
1025:Talk
1017:Afro
1006:talk
988:Talk
980:Afro
968:talk
960:done
944:Talk
936:Afro
916:talk
841:talk
835:- §§
833:done
803:talk
769:talk
763:- §§
761:done
752:talk
736:talk
730:- §§
728:done
714:talk
708:- §§
706:done
681:talk
620:Talk
605:done
579:Talk
564:done
546:Talk
531:done
513:Talk
498:done
480:Talk
465:done
447:Talk
432:done
414:Talk
395:done
375:Talk
318:talk
298:Talk
283:done
261:Talk
246:done
204:Talk
174:Talk
106:logs
80:talk
76:edit
3246:)
3195:)
3106:.
3102:or
3096:not
3092:was
3037:)
3003:)
2952:)
2858:)
2826:)
2717:)
2615:)
2448:FLC
2440:lot
2405:.
2229:)
1867:)
1498:ray
1492:Big
1008:)
970:)
962:-§§
918:)
905:In
843:)
805:)
771:)
738:)
716:)
320:)
52:by
3360:)
3342:)
3321:)
3299:)
3260:)
3209:)
3177:)
3162:)
3114:)
3071:•
3057:)
3018:)
2986:)
2967:)
2910:)
2887:•
2873:)
2840:)
2731:)
2658:)
2629:)
2596:)
2582:)
2567:)
2548:)
2530:)
2511:)
2476:)
2458:)
2428:)
2413:)
2395:)
2369:)
2346:•
2328:)
2312:)
2166:,
2118:•
2087:•
2054:•
2021:•
1984:•
1951:•
1917:•
1829:•
1795:•
1762:•
1729:•
1696:•
1663:•
1630:•
1597:•
1564:•
1531:•
1472:)
1449:•
1441:-
1416:•
1408:-
1383:•
1375:-
1347:•
1339:-
1311:•
1303:-
1278:•
1270:-
1245:•
1237:-
1211:•
1203:-
1178:•
1170:-
1150:)
1123:•
1082:)
1044:•
1030:)
993:)
949:)
754:)
683:)
615:•
607:-
574:•
566:-
541:•
533:-
508:•
500:-
475:•
467:-
442:•
434:-
409:•
370:•
293:•
285:-
256:•
248:-
199:•
184:;
169:•
108:|
104:|
100:|
96:|
91:|
87:|
82:|
78:|
59:.
33:.
3356:(
3338:(
3317:(
3295:(
3256:(
3242:(
3205:(
3191:(
3173:(
3158:(
3110:(
3079:)
3073:(
3053:(
3033:(
3014:(
2999:(
2982:(
2963:(
2948:(
2906:(
2895:)
2889:(
2869:(
2854:(
2836:(
2822:(
2727:(
2713:(
2654:(
2625:(
2611:(
2594:✔
2592:(
2578:(
2563:(
2544:(
2526:(
2507:(
2472:(
2454:(
2424:(
2409:(
2391:(
2365:(
2354:)
2348:(
2324:(
2308:(
2237:—
2225:(
2174:—
2135:—
2126:)
2120:(
2095:)
2089:(
2062:)
2056:(
2029:)
2023:(
2003:₹
1992:)
1986:(
1959:)
1953:(
1925:)
1919:(
1875:—
1863:(
1837:)
1831:(
1803:)
1797:(
1770:)
1764:(
1737:)
1731:(
1704:)
1698:(
1671:)
1665:(
1638:)
1632:(
1605:)
1599:(
1572:)
1566:(
1539:)
1533:(
1496:X
1490:D
1468:(
1457:)
1451:(
1424:)
1418:(
1391:)
1385:(
1355:)
1349:(
1319:)
1313:(
1286:)
1280:(
1253:)
1247:(
1219:)
1213:(
1186:)
1180:(
1146:(
1131:)
1125:(
1080:✔
1078:(
1052:)
1046:(
1020:(
1004:(
983:(
966:(
939:(
914:(
858:—
839:(
801:(
767:(
750:(
734:(
712:(
679:(
623:)
617:(
582:)
576:(
549:)
543:(
516:)
510:(
483:)
477:(
450:)
444:(
417:)
411:(
378:)
372:(
316:(
301:)
295:(
264:)
258:(
207:)
201:(
177:)
171:(
112:)
74:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.