Knowledge

:Featured list candidates/Danuta Gleed Literary Award/archive1 - Knowledge

Source 📝

242:"The prize money for the winner was increased from..." It's technically fine but feels abrupt- why not say that it's 10k for the winning work, and was 5k prior to 2004? Or that it was 5k when the work was created, but was increased to 10k in 2004? Describing the change prior to either of the two states feels strange. 805:
You need an independent native English speaker to look at all the prose. E.g. "The year's shortlist is chosen in May " May is in the past, e.g. "with neither runner-ups " that's "runners-up", e.g. "until the late January." should be "before the end of January" or something similar. It's just not
487:
Why do you call out the "other nominees" with green and dagger symbols, but leave the runners-up with nothing? Shouldn't it be the other way around, since the runners-up did better than the other nominees? (Runner up means second place, after the winner). Also, publishers/ publications should be
327:
Do you have any information on why this award matters? Like, sources saying it is an important award, or barring that sources just talking about the award- I mean, I would assume an award by the Canadian Writer's Union is pretty legit, but I shouldn't have to assume, you should tell me how
298:
Maybe before you describe the differences between this award and some other award, you should describe what the other prize is? As in, "there is another Candadian short story award, the x award, which is given by so-and-so for best short story
510:
Well, different people tell me different things, but ok I will do this. Regarding your first question: because I feel that the second place is the golden medium. This system may be compared with a podium. But I may change it anytime.
122: 117: 488:
linked, if they have an article, and you still have some of the publishers italicized- Bloomsbury USA isn't a book, its a company, and neither is Little, Brown, and Co., or most of the things you have italicized. --
270:"...and publishers, for example in 2011" - "...publisher, for example, were judges in 2011". It needs to be an independent clause, it feels all weird like it is, and needs a comma after 'example'. 374:
Do we have any information on the other nominees for each year? Seems like we do, at the writersunion site. They also mention the publisher of each work- why is that not here?
88: 83: 92: 75: 591: 138: 40: 833: 815: 796: 778: 760: 743: 722: 695: 681: 643: 629: 612: 567: 538: 520: 501: 478: 460: 442: 401: 187: 170: 422:
Consider archiving your online references so your citations aren't wiped out if the specific pages you're referencing are removed/changed.
30: 17: 382: 143: 385:- showing the other nominees (especially as it looks like the Writer's Union notes the runners-up) and the publishers/publications. 79: 378: 824:
Done, copyedited the lead. The third para may need a slight copyedit. I don't understand your first point, though. Regards.--
829: 792: 756: 677: 639: 534: 516: 474: 456: 397: 183: 166: 71: 64: 451:
Thanks for your review. I will reorganize the table first, then working on the prose, MOS and references. Regards.--
256:"The year's shortlist is certain in May..." certain? You mean chosen/decided? And chosen by who- the writer's union? 811: 774: 739: 718: 691: 625: 608: 563: 357:
Only two of the years have references? I'd expect them all to, and those refs to be in a seperate "ref." column
825: 788: 787:
I copyedited the last paragraph. I was told redlinks are distracting and against the FL criteria. Regards.--
752: 673: 635: 530: 512: 470: 452: 393: 179: 162: 807: 770: 769:
Nope, you haven't had the lead copyedited, nor answered concerns over the lack of linked authors/books.
735: 714: 687: 621: 604: 559: 686:
You've made nearly all of them italics, why? Publishers not in italics, publications in italics.
371:
That's a whole lot of whitespace- consider making the list wider, maybe centering it in the page.
580: 495: 436: 53: 228:, is still flowing into the award funds." - what? How is a book flowing into the funds? 377:
Basically, while I'm obviously biased, I would expect the list table to look more like
663:
Actually, I would suggest you get the lead properly copyedited, there are many issues.
109: 490: 431: 193:
Hooray, literary award lists! I'm a fan, for some unknowable reason. Anyway!
392:
Good suggestion. I reformatted the table. I will do the publisher column.--
806:
good enough. You also seem to have ignored a few of the comments above...
669:
Publisher or publication column, publications should be shown in italics.
364:
I added an external links section with all the winners and nominees.
39:
Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in
597:
Three dab pages, Terence Young, Jonathan Bennett, Daniel Griffin.
600:"is still flowing into " strange turn of phrase. Still funds? 419:
You don't have a publisher listed for the globe-and-mail cite.
620:
I mean replace "is still flowing into" with "still funds"...
123:
Featured list candidates/Danuta Gleed Literary Award/archive2
118:
Featured list candidates/Danuta Gleed Literary Award/archive1
148: 666:
Concern over the number of unlinked authors/books here.
105: 101: 97: 57: 210:
The first two paragraphs are two sentences each- why?
313:
Also, define what you mean by publisher-independent.
178:
A short article about a short story prize. Regards.
586:
Infobox "Canadian Short fiction collections" -: -->
320:It is independent to any publisher, ie indie works 855:The above discussion is preserved as an archive. 579:You should use a symbol as well as a colour per 469:I replied to the remaining comments. Regards.-- 43:. No further edits should be made to this page. 710:Don't mix date formats for publication dates. 861:No further edits should be made to this page. 656:"Initially C$ 5,000 high" no need for "high". 29:The following is an archived discussion of a 8: 335:There are not much information, I am afraid. 342:My eyes! Why is the list header bright red? 553: 127: 284:Fun, a one-sentence paragraph at the end! 707:That's not the right Kelly Cooper is it? 592:Category:Awards by year of establishment 583:for indicating winners etc in the table. 556: 130: 115: 41:Knowledge talk:Featured list candidates 672:False; I deitalicized all. Regards.-- 7: 24: 18:Knowledge:Featured list candidates 383:Nebula Award for Best Short Story 196:"The annually prize was founded" 379:Hugo Award for Best Short Story 529:I deitalicized all. Regards.-- 1: 700:Deitalicized non-publications 568:09:49, 3 September 2012 (UTC) 349:Blame the Canadian flag : --> 834:12:17, 23 August 2012 (UTC) 816:11:24, 23 August 2012 (UTC) 797:11:12, 23 August 2012 (UTC) 779:10:58, 23 August 2012 (UTC) 761:10:56, 23 August 2012 (UTC) 744:09:53, 23 August 2012 (UTC) 723:11:24, 23 August 2012 (UTC) 696:11:24, 23 August 2012 (UTC) 682:10:04, 25 August 2012 (UTC) 644:09:43, 25 August 2012 (UTC) 630:12:19, 23 August 2012 (UTC) 613:11:24, 23 August 2012 (UTC) 539:10:04, 25 August 2012 (UTC) 521:15:37, 23 August 2012 (UTC) 502:15:01, 23 August 2012 (UTC) 479:17:27, 20 August 2012 (UTC) 461:15:03, 19 August 2012 (UTC) 443:05:33, 19 August 2012 (UTC) 402:14:35, 20 August 2012 (UTC) 188:19:03, 18 August 2012 (UTC) 171:19:03, 18 August 2012 (UTC) 72:Danuta Gleed Literary Award 65:Danuta Gleed Literary Award 878: 659:"receive each C$ 5" -: --> 590:Could add an appropraite 858:Please do not modify it. 56:16:18, 8 September 2012 36:Please do not modify it. 31:featured list nomination 558:Resolved comments from 291:Merged with first para 634:Ok, done. Regards.-- 328:prestigious it is. 226:One for the Chosen 224:"His wife's work, 851: 850: 174: 156: 155: 869: 860: 808:The Rambling Man 771:The Rambling Man 751:Done. Regards.-- 736:The Rambling Man 715:The Rambling Man 688:The Rambling Man 622:The Rambling Man 605:The Rambling Man 560:The Rambling Man 557: 554: 498: 493: 439: 434: 159: 128: 113: 95: 38: 877: 876: 872: 871: 870: 868: 867: 866: 865: 856: 496: 491: 437: 432: 86: 70: 68: 34: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 875: 873: 864: 863: 849: 848: 847: 846: 845: 844: 843: 842: 841: 840: 839: 838: 837: 836: 819: 818: 800: 799: 782: 781: 764: 763: 733: 732: 731: 730: 729: 728: 708: 705: 704: 703: 702: 701: 684: 667: 664: 661: 660:"each receive" 657: 654: 653: 652: 651: 650: 649: 648: 647: 646: 617:removed still 598: 595: 588: 584: 571: 570: 552: 551: 550: 549: 548: 547: 546: 545: 544: 543: 542: 541: 524: 523: 505: 504: 482: 481: 464: 463: 446: 445: 426: 425: 424: 423: 420: 416: 415: 414: 413: 412: 411: 405: 404: 387: 386: 375: 372: 368: 367: 366: 365: 359: 358: 354: 353: 352: 351: 344: 343: 339: 338: 337: 336: 330: 329: 324: 323: 322: 321: 315: 314: 310: 309: 308: 307: 301: 300: 295: 294: 293: 292: 286: 285: 281: 280: 279: 278: 272: 271: 267: 266: 265: 264: 258: 257: 253: 252: 251: 250: 244: 243: 239: 238: 237: 236: 230: 229: 221: 220: 219: 218: 212: 211: 207: 206: 205: 204: 198: 197: 176: 175: 161:Nominator(s): 154: 153: 152: 151: 149:External links 146: 141: 133: 132: 126: 125: 120: 67: 62: 61: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 874: 862: 859: 853: 852: 835: 831: 827: 823: 822: 821: 820: 817: 813: 809: 804: 803: 802: 801: 798: 794: 790: 786: 785: 784: 783: 780: 776: 772: 768: 767: 766: 765: 762: 758: 754: 750: 749: 748: 747: 746: 745: 741: 737: 726: 725: 724: 720: 716: 712: 711: 709: 706: 699: 698: 697: 693: 689: 685: 683: 679: 675: 671: 670: 668: 665: 662: 658: 655: 645: 641: 637: 633: 632: 631: 627: 623: 619: 618: 616: 615: 614: 610: 606: 602: 601: 599: 596: 593: 589: 585: 582: 578: 577: 576: 573: 572: 569: 565: 561: 555: 540: 536: 532: 528: 527: 526: 525: 522: 518: 514: 509: 508: 507: 506: 503: 500: 499: 494: 486: 485: 484: 483: 480: 476: 472: 468: 467: 466: 465: 462: 458: 454: 450: 449: 448: 447: 444: 441: 440: 435: 428: 427: 421: 418: 417: 409: 408: 407: 406: 403: 399: 395: 391: 390: 389: 388: 384: 380: 376: 373: 370: 369: 363: 362: 361: 360: 356: 355: 348: 347: 346: 345: 341: 340: 334: 333: 332: 331: 326: 325: 319: 318: 317: 316: 312: 311: 305: 304: 303: 302: 297: 296: 290: 289: 288: 287: 283: 282: 276: 275: 274: 273: 269: 268: 262: 261: 260: 259: 255: 254: 248: 247: 246: 245: 241: 240: 234: 233: 232: 231: 227: 223: 222: 216: 215: 214: 213: 209: 208: 202: 201: 200: 199: 195: 194: 192: 191: 190: 189: 185: 181: 173: 172: 168: 164: 158: 157: 150: 147: 145: 142: 140: 137: 136: 135: 134: 129: 124: 121: 119: 116: 114: 111: 107: 103: 99: 94: 90: 85: 81: 77: 73: 66: 63: 60: 58: 55: 51: 48:The list was 44: 42: 37: 32: 27: 26: 19: 857: 854: 734: 574: 489: 430: 225: 177: 160: 144:Citation bot 69: 50:not promoted 49: 47: 35: 28: 217:Reorganized 713:Not done. 603:Not done. 511:Regards.-- 249:I reworded 54:Giants2008 594:category. 581:WP:ACCESS 235:Reworded 139:Analysis 727:Done ;) 299:debut". 131:Toolbox 89:protect 84:history 826:Kürbis 789:Kürbis 753:Kürbis 674:Kürbis 636:Kürbis 587:short. 575:Oppose 531:Kürbis 513:Kürbis 471:Kürbis 453:Kürbis 394:Kürbis 180:Kürbis 163:Kürbis 93:delete 203:Fixed 110:views 102:watch 98:links 16:< 812:talk 775:talk 740:talk 719:talk 692:talk 626:talk 609:talk 564:talk 492:Pres 433:Pres 410:Done 306:Done 277:Done 263:Done 106:logs 80:talk 76:edit 381:or 350::)! 52:by 832:) 814:) 795:) 777:) 759:) 742:) 721:) 694:) 680:) 642:) 628:) 611:) 566:) 537:) 519:) 477:) 459:) 429:-- 400:) 186:) 169:) 108:| 104:| 100:| 96:| 91:| 87:| 82:| 78:| 59:. 33:. 830:✔ 828:( 810:( 793:✔ 791:( 773:( 757:✔ 755:( 738:( 717:( 690:( 678:✔ 676:( 640:✔ 638:( 624:( 607:( 562:( 535:✔ 533:( 517:✔ 515:( 497:N 475:✔ 473:( 457:✔ 455:( 438:N 398:✔ 396:( 184:✔ 182:( 167:✔ 165:( 112:) 74:(

Index

Knowledge:Featured list candidates
featured list nomination
Knowledge talk:Featured list candidates
Giants2008

Danuta Gleed Literary Award
Danuta Gleed Literary Award
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
Featured list candidates/Danuta Gleed Literary Award/archive1
Featured list candidates/Danuta Gleed Literary Award/archive2
Analysis
Citation bot
External links
Kürbis

19:03, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
Kürbis

19:03, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
Hugo Award for Best Short Story
Nebula Award for Best Short Story
Kürbis

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.